The New JFK Show #197 Shill Shooting and Life Magazine

Video Transcript:

All right, welcome to the new JFK show number 197. We will hit the double century mark here pretty soon. All right, we're gonna do a little show shooting tonight as Don likes to say in his new redneck Austin accent. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. All right, so I've got some other things. We're gonna be going super old school tonight. I found three issues in my mother's attic and once the evolution of an assassin, we also have... I have that one, I have that one too. Yeah, and then we've got, oh John Connolly, taking a closer look at the film that he's in and we'll talk about that. And then I also found this one, believe it or not, all in one score, they've got, let's see. Yeah. Yeah, we've got Lee in the doorway right there. They're gonna actually spell it out what happened. Which magazine is that? This is Life Magazine, they're all Life Magazine. Life actually got Lee in the doorway? No, no, no, no, they're just pointing it out, but it's the, they're calling him Billy Love Lady, but we know it, we all know it's Lee. Yeah. He would have never seen Billy knew he was two or three inches to short 15 to 20 pounds too heavy and was wearing a red and white vertically straight short sleeve shirt. And this one was pretty bald also. Okay, here we go. Close examination, all right wait, hold on, it says, speculation that Oswald could have not been the assassin was ignited by this discovery of the photograph in the far right. It shows in the crowd, it showed the crowd, the book depository in the background and Kennedy clutching his throat in the car at the instant he was shot. Close examination of an enlargement of the area in front of the depository showed a man who seemed to resemble Lee Oswald. If it indeed was he, then he could not have, it would not have been possible for Oswald to have been firing from the window above. Brilliant induction. The person followed by. All right, now hold on. These guys are rockets, scientists. Perfect, followed by. But a check of the depository workers revealed, a man, the man was not Oswald, but indeed Billy Lovelady, another employee. It settled, we got it. We're ready to barf, thank God, life settled it long ago. We've been chasing after a phantom. Along with the backyard photos on the front wall. All we have to do is read live Larry. Yeah, they were pushing it hard. Now, and so I guess we know the story about Life magazine. And they were a very impartial fair. That's right, objective relentless, investigative organization. Yes, with the highest standards. They got down to the bottom of all of these big issues. OK, so this we're on Life magazine. Let me go ahead and do this little sia piece real quick. All right, now we all know about the magazine with Lee. And it says right here, the case. No, no, no, that's not Lee, that's Roscoe. Yeah, but it's not what it says on the front page. It says, Lee Oswald, with the weapons he used to kill, President Kennedy and Officer Kippit. And Jim Garrison said, well, it's all already. It's done. Yeah, how objective can they be? That's right. So I'll be in the case in a single manufactured photograph. Love it. Absolutely. Let me move our hourglass out the way a little bit here. OK, now in Life magazine, we have the evolution of an assassin. All right, so we're just going to flip one page. And I want everyone to be aware of the sia of the big letters at the top of each page. So you turn to the next page and it says, Lee was the leader on the playground. All right. So then we move to the next one. It says he didn't seem to miss having friends. So the assistant being the leader on the playground and not having any friends? Yeah, he didn't seem to miss having friends, though, he was the leader. But then I returned to the very next page. And it says he looked like he was just lost. He was just lost all the time. So every time you turn the page, you have to read the big page. And just to show you where we are, they're advertising the most iconic hippie van in the world. The most bust. Yeah, the Volkswagen van. Yeah, the Volkswagen. You know it's old magazine. Hey, you know, there's something subtle there, right? Tell us, Larry. Tell us. Family show. Well, you know, the Aryan German manufactured. It sounds like he should have been using a Mauser gear. Good to have been. Good to have been. All right. So we go to the next page and they form us that Lee never came to squadron parties. I mean, you know, that's a sure sign of assassin. Yeah, you can't make it. Oh, you're not assassin automatically right there. OK, then I'll let you read it. What we got next? I am the commander. He barked at Marina. Right. Of course. I'm the commander. OK, I'm just flipping pages. Marina wondered if he was on balance. The FBI told her to kill me, killing me. I see if they continue on. Yes, they do. On the rifle range, he was asked. Oh, yeah. Oh, and then his man, he's drawers all the time for completely missing the target. Yeah. What's what we got in the next page? He poked a rifle out that window. Wow. He poked it out there. I saw it. All right. So there you go. And then the same magazine. Now, tell me they weren't hitting it hard. Let's go to this one. I bet you they got a little bit out like we were six years old. I bet you know, I bet you they got a little 15-year-old Amos Eulins as the main witness about the poking out the window. Yeah. Completely reliable witness. Look at this picture here. What Larry, rather than you, Gary, for some reason, speak out. Speak out. Was this man saying? Was he saying this man here? Look at that. Why do they always take the worst picture? All right. So let me read just a paragraph here. He looks like a psycho there, Gary. The thoughts of a man who has committed a singular act of violence can only be gasped at. Never known. The Instraudinary picture of Jack Ruby was taken as he was leaving the jail for pretrial tests by doctors to examine the physical and mental condition of the man who shot Lee Harvey Oswald, whose own bizarre story can be told in remarkable detail beginning on pace. So that's what they were saying. I just showed you the remarkable detail that they talked about Lee. All right. As the hearings that preceded Jack Ruby's trial began in the week of doubt, late last week in Dallas, there was no possible doubt that he fired the bullet that ended Lee Oswald's life. Millions saw him do it on television. And this fact alone can make it difficult to find 12 jurors. No possible doubt. No, I know. Notice how they're reassuring. Yeah. Way back then. Yeah. A preemptive even raising the question. Yeah, the tone of the article is to reassure that it's Ruby doing the shooting and the basement. That's right. There'll be all there. Beyond any doubt. Yeah. Hey, it's coming from the loose empire. Well, I'm telling you, life magazine was the one. And see, this was back in the days when you didn't have 1,000 magazines. There was NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS. Gary was all CIA. All of it from the very beginning. Absolutely. Yeah, but this was Josiah Thompson's work, right? They were featuring there. Yeah, speaking of, let's do this real quick. And get the volume right. In the meantime, I just wanted to say that I have a new angle that I spoke to Jim about. Another entity that we need to add to the list of JFK enemies. And we'll talk about that later. I'm a pretty, pretty good Larry. Got it. Here we go. The last 30 years, I don't know how many murders I've done. Probably go over 100. Investigated. Investigated. Oh, yeah. Thank you. It's a good clarification. That's right. The more you investigate, the more it becomes crystal clear what happened. I don't think any other crime that I know of in history has been investigated with the kind of intensity that this has. And yet, I don't think we get any closer to knowing what happened. Now, then we were 40, 45 years ago. I've been thinking about November 22nd. OK. The phrase, tectonic shift kept coming to me. And I kept thinking about December 7, 1941. I have our hopes. And about 9, 11. Of course 9, 11. We're all there glued to our TV. But November 22nd was different. It was no Y. Friday afternoon, the Y is that there's some Marxist sympathizer nut case in Dallas of all places. We decided to shoot the president. And then Sunday, that nut case is off to our national television. What was different about November 22nd? And the tectonic shift that occurred there it was right from the beginning. We couldn't put a Y answer on it. It seemed to be beyond that. Because we're talking about Hawaii. This case has become so cliché. It seems to me conspiracy theories here, conspiracy theories, theory, et cetera. And what I'm struggling with is this. I know this happened one way rather than another. It had to happen one way, right? If you could get inside the photos, you would know what happened. Oh my God. Gary Paws. Paws. I'm surprised you lasted this long. Go ahead, Larry. Look where he's got Alchins. So laughable. Alchins was right in the middle of the lane on the South Lane of Elm Street. You want to understand when this first appeared. I did a column about it included in title JFK, the CIA and the New York Times, in which I blew them apart. I rooted this video and explained how he'd been setting himself up to disavow conspiracy theories for the 50th. For some years in advance, I'd been calling him out on it when he disavowed his double hip theory. They had planned to do 50 of these little short interviews with Errol Harris. And I think they found that downside was so bad. They abandoned it after this one. I and I believe it was because of my article. And Jim, I want to add that the six seconds is total BS. Because now we know by the Newcomtapes that it was more like 20, 25 maybe even half a minute. Yeah. It wasn't six seconds on Elm Street or whatever. Well, the book, of course, not only includes a double hip theory, obvious proof of conspiracy because you can't have two shots in such a short interval of time from the same weapon. But the McClellan diagram, obviously, proof of a shot from in front and yet in the concluding paragraphs, he said, nothing in this book proves there was a conspiracy, which Vitsa Landry had called him out as an op, almost immediately Larry. And I want to add to that that Vince told me that because Vince knew this guy from Philadelphia days. And this guy, there was a case where these guys got arrested in some kind of demonstration. And Salandria being involved with the ACLU went to defend these guys. And much to the surprise that Tink Thompson was taken out that sort of like the back door wasn't even charged or anything, you know, as a probable agent from architecture. OK, so there you go. And that was by from the Vince who told me that personally. Vince is a good man, Josiah Thompson is not. Well, when you have music like this behind you, you just know. I mean, what does conspiracy, saw-out music sound like? Well, let's get it a listen. We're taking film, movie film, or still photos in dealing with Blasda that day. The film evidence actually makes it possible to lay out a reasonably precise scenario as to what happened. That's really the problem for the authorized account. As the extricate time. Do you want evidence that's authentic in the Kennedy Association? I'll tell you where to find it. Go to the films and photos of Deely Plaza, the most obvious place. We're all altered. All authentic because it authenticates itself. When convinced he was involved at some point in this alteration business. He said that all the film photos were authentic and it authenticates itself. Even Beverly Brunson back in 1967, 1968 said that all of the photographic evidence was altered, that you could not trust it. And she's talking about late 60s. Well, Joe Sides, most famous quote is the closest thing we had to absolute truth. This is a prudertil. Yeah, and guess what? Guess what? I'll tell you that too. And guess what's also in that camp, Jim. We done? Bob Groten will tell you that the prudertil is a thing. Yeah, we know. We know. No, Jim D. Eugenio. Thank you. That's an unholy treat. Yeah, and we call Shio Schutten mit like Schutten in the barrel. All right, I got a couple of more Shio's. Any more about Tim Johnson? You don't want to go through the whole thing. It's fascinating because it explains how if there's an innocuous explanation for anything you think is sinister and he uses the umbrella man as the example claiming there was an innocent explanation, you've got to watch this to believe it. Yeah. All right. I'll tell you what, we'll go back to that if we have no time. OK, so we're going to go to the next show. And then we can turn up the volume so everyone can make sure they hear it all. Areas on the warpath tonight. I'm pissed. So some of the biggest lies in American history really kind of come here. This is literally where the seeds are planted. And we all know once you plan a seeded down in someone's mind, especially America's mind, it's almost impossible to uproot. First of all, make it clear, the conspiracy, the lies that we're talking about, aren't not that Oswald didn't do it. He did it, of course. He did it. But where history has been changed is, A is motivation. We knew, I mean, I had the paper, the very next day, Dallas 40 News. Communist. He is communist, of course. And let's just put blame where it really does belong. I'm Jack Ruby, right? If Jack Ruby, and let's never question this, we ask, right, what is Oswald doing for two years in Russia that nobody knows about? Two years unaccounted for it. What is, how does Jack Ruby get past its higher police station? Full of policemen who at that moment should be guarding the sky like is the ultimate person you have to be protected on the earth. And in that moment, Jack Ruby robbed history of the truth. Because the only man who knows what's going on is Lee Harvey Oswald. And if today someone came forward and said, you know what, Lam? I did it. I'm the one who helped Oswald. Here's the proof I have. We know what believe him. Right? If he said, here's the video I have, no one believe him. And immediately, all of Oswald's story began to change by the media. And it began to change because there was a race to tell the story. One of the first books that comes out says, JFK said, oh my gosh, I've been shot. And now everyone says, oh my gosh, if he spoke, then he must have been shot by someone else because his throat was out. So they must have been shot. It makes logical sense except for the fact that when you look at Jackie Kennedy, the other secret service person in the car, governor Conley, you know what they all said? He said nothing. He said nothing. He said nothing. He said nothing. There's a guy also who's here who's photographing him brother. Okay? And people go, oh my gosh, he opened the umbrella. That was a signal. It's a signal to Oswald. He knew what to do. It's all a big plan. You know what? You're gonna love this because of the fellow lover of history. What he was doing was protesting Neville Chamberlain. He was basically saying Neville Chamberlain was Karen and brother. He was in peas or his protested jacket. It's all a good sign Thompson's story. This guy's a pathetic example. At least Josiah had a certain bizzaz. This guy has nothing. He's in the Posner category gym. Yeah, I agree Larry. Absolutely. Matthew, Swastik over there just a good effect. One of the truest problems that we have when we look at all this and the reason that it gets so confusing for America is when the Warren Commission first examined everything, the Kennedy family demanded utter secrecy. The Kennedy family said, do not show the autopsy photos. Do not show the autopsy results. Do not show the photos of far fallen family member with this head blown off. The problem is, is America never got to see. He once hit from the back of head. There's nothing in the front of the head. But as a result of that, as a result of that secrecy, the Kennedy family, I mean, sadly did a harm that is part John do. Does he understand what he just said? Nothing in the front of the head. It was a blow out at the back of the head, which means a shot from the front. I mean, does he not even understand that he just contradicted his position? And had there been a shot from behind his whole face would have been blown out Jim? Yes, yes. Well, how can he be shot from in front? From behind. Hey, who are we quoting? Who we quoting there? Frank McGee. Frank McGee. That's the good congress. Yeah, it is congress. How can the man be shot from in front from behind? Yes. Nobody's fool Frank McGee. I'm a shooter was there. That's what they say. That's what they say. And that was done. Down is where Oswald was. Yeah, so that's a six-full art. This is it. This is ground zero. Six-four in the book, The Pository. Oswald leans out of there, takes that shot. Who is this loser? You know, I'm not sure he's one of the four. You should do shows on the history channel about lost history. On the history channel. Yeah. There you go. But Gary, Gary, do we need to keep much more than from this clown? Right. We've heard enough, Gary. Yeah. Too enough? I know from him. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Come on. You've picked it. OK. All right. Last shot of the night. We're going to bust. I think he's an amoral psychopath. I think he is cruel, evil, vicious, vindictive, drunk. Of course, I like Roger. So I'm not quite prepared to see what we're going to hear. UV and today we're sitting down with Roger Stone, the well-known political operative, and the author most recently of fascinating a book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, The Case Against LBJ. Roger, thanks for talking to us. Great to be here. So in the beginning of the book, you say you'd have to delve into the Kennedy assassination of the 50th anniversary. He's coming up in a few weeks is to lay down with cooks and nuts. Why are you doing this to me? Well, you know, the whole term conspiracy theorist, that's a pejorative. That's what the mainstream media uses to denigrate anyone who questions the government's version of virtually anything. I don't believe that UFOs landed in Roswell, New Mexico. I don't believe the attack on America 9-11 was an inside job. I'm really not a conspiracy guy. So I'm not talking in conspiracy. I'm talking facts. And I think Lyndon Johnson had unique motive, means, and opportunity to kill John Kennedy. And I think he participated in a plot to do so. OK, briefly, I outlined The Case Against LBJ. Sure. One of the things that is fascinating about the book is that it's a rich compilation of existing scholarship and kind of recenticides work about really the kind of disastrous and awful personalized, but also political lights of JFK, as well as LBJ. You tie LBJ to what, eight murders prior to John F. Kennedy. At least eight. And I'm not including his own sister who we may have killed. OK, he's bearing with that. No, I don't know what the case against LBJ. First of all, I think I do think he's a serial murderer. I think that there is a long trail of murders pertaining to the cover-up of epic corruption. I mean, corruption of biblical proportions. I also think he murdered to cover-up vote-threat theft and fraud with which he got first got to the United States Senate. And this, I mean, in your ledger, in your favor, I mean, there's no question that he rigged that election. No question. The landslide-Lendon election. Yeah, he steals it with 87 fraudulent votes. People who voted enough, a medical order. Amazingly, they all had the same handwriting and they all signed in in the same ink. So I think that he is, I think he's an immoral psychopath. I think he is cruel, evil, vicious, vindictive, drunk. One of the things that is generally fascinating about the book is the way that you tie organized crime to Nixon, but especially JFK and Lyndon Johnson in various ways, talk about Malcolm Wallace. Because he's the guy that you say actually put the bullet into Kennedy's head. Sure. Malcolm Wallace is Lyndon Johnson's personal hitman. Malcolm Wallace has gotten a long succession of federal patriot jobs. He works the agriculture department at the behest of Johnson in 1951. He murders a man named John Kinzer, who is intimately involved with Johnson's sister. Kinzer is blackmailing Johnson. He murders Kinzer in cold blood in front of witnesses. When he's apprehended, he tells the apprehending officer, you can't arrest me. I have to get back to Washington. I work for Senator Johnson. He goes to trial for first degree murder. He is defended by Lyndon Johnson's personal attorney, John Cofur. He is convicted. He gets a five year suspended sentence and he walks out of free man. He is immediately hired by a company called Temco, a defense contractor owned by a fellow named HD Bird. HD Bird also is one of the major financiers in LBJ's career. He also dabbles in real estate. He owns the Texas Schoolbook Depository Building. Talk a little bit about one of the things that's fascinating about Kennedy assassination theories is that you've always got everybody has to hustle leaf Harvey Oswald off the stage, ideally. Because Oswald is an obvious gunman. He's a Marine. He defects the Soviet Union. He's a Marxist. He's a Pro Castro guy. Yeah, but he's there. Was there that? Yes, he's definitely there. But he's the Patsy. He's the fall guy. First of all, his communist background is fabricated. We now know based on the testimony of at least two secret service agents that he's trained by the, by the, I'm pardon me, CIA agents. He's trained by the CIA in a defective program. He goes to Russia. He's there. He comes back. He gets a citizenship back like that, even though he's renounced it. The American government lends him $5,000 and they pay for his airfare. Let's talk a little bit about this. What changes, you know, what changes if we fully accept and kind of internalize the idea that LBJ killed John F Kennedy? How does that change our understanding of American politics of history and who we are as a nation? Well, obviously at this late date, no one is going to try lending Johnson Pustincy and the convicted of murder. But I think if my book achieves nothing, if it persuades people that what the government tells you cannot be believed, that anything the government tells you needs to be regarded with a certain heavy dose of skepticism, then I will have accomplished something important. Okay. And this is published by Skyhorse Books, which publishes a wide range of things somewhere in the conspiracy frame, Jesse Ventor. It's one of their authors. They do other kinds of things. I think you're going to be doing more books with them. Talk a little bit about your future. Yeah, I've got a couple different books in mind. I'd like to do a book on Hillary Clinton. I don't believe Chelsea Clinton. I believe Chelsea Clinton is the daughter of Web Hubble and Hillary Clinton. And I'm going to try to prove that in print. Okay. Well, that, you know, onward and upward. Yes. Thank you, Roger Stone. The new book is The Man Who Killed Kennedy, the case against LBJ. It is a... You know, fellas, I have to apologize because I think I have the wrong video. I think he's an amoral cycle. What's okay? Yeah, it was okay, but he totally said that 9-11 was not, was it not... I said it, he didn't believe it was an inside job. He didn't believe A. Lee and slanted it rose while he appears to be wrong on both of those. That doesn't mean he can't be right about the pivotal role of LBJ. In fact, we know he is correct. He seems to be wrong about where he positions Mac Wallace. But, you know, Mac was Lyndon's personal hitman. I mean, this is the debate. I agree that everything... It was loaded with facts, but why are you going to see it? I'm 100% truth or guy. Why do you have to say that 9-11 was... Was it... You know, you believe the guy... Because he's trying to show he's not a conspiracy theorist who believes everything that comes down the pipe. I mean, you know, that's all. It's doing that as a political... I don't know that Roger actually has studied 9-11. But he's got a decent book about LBJ as responsible party for... Well, JFK, and he's, you know, he's in the right ballpark. He's got the right target. So I can forgive him having some details, not quite right, and ignore the fact that he's dismissing to about 9-11 in Roswell. Well, let's just unpack this for a minute. Okay. Couple of points I'd like to make. All right, so he said he doesn't think that 9-11 was an inside job. Okay, well then, to me 9-11 is the litmus test. Okay, if you're supposed to be this heavy hitter from the Nixon administration forward, well, then 9-11 was right in the prime of your career. Okay, if you can't figure out 9-11, you know, as Bill Belichich says, either you don't know or you don't care. Okay, 9-11, big event. If you can't get 9-11 right, then... Okay, as soon as I hear that, I have to... Yeah, I'm in because right there, that's enough for me. It's enough. 9-11 is the litmus test, okay? If you don't know... And Roger Stone just failed the hat. And the other point that he said was, okay, nobody's obviously gonna try Lyndon Johnson posthumously at this late date. So what he's telling you there is, it's a little Judy Woodish, okay? Well, it happened, but nobody's going on trial for this. You know, it's a little too late now, but you know, it was a conspiracy, but you know, we're not gonna take any legal action now, because that's just too late now. But we can have a mock trial for Lee Oswell, we can have a mock trial for LBJ. Yeah. Larry, you're input on this. Well, you know, Roger, you know, he's made a lot of great contributions, you know, on the LBJ front, you know, and plus, you know, as Don mentioned, you know, he was very well connected to Nixon. That's true, but I had to say real quick that there's not one thing that he said that wasn't in Phil Nelson's book. Yeah, that's true, true, true. I agree, I agree. Phil, I think Phil is the number one authority on LBJ. Let's see. I believe that too. And also believe it is almost like, in a way, he kind of co-ops Phil Nelson a little bit, you know, like, take it. Yeah, everything that is in his book, you know, is covered by Phil, you know, and not only in his first book, but in the second book, you know, the co-op. The losses. Yeah. Where he goes even further in proving LBJ's complicity and the whole thing there. I know. You want me to tell you how much further he went? He actually did. Yeah. He did. He did. But, you know, Roger is a very, you know, very famous personality, you know, and he is well accepted in conferences and everything. And a lot of people, you know, they gravitate around him, you know, Jim has been the conferences where he's been, you know, and he's always, you know, the big star, you know, all the time. So, you know, what can I say? Yeah, there's a lot of these guys that do the conference circuit that are a little dubious to say the least. Yeah, well, you know, not a tan or work, and you had a side of the street. So mathematically speaking. I know a guy that hasn't been invited to a 9-11 conference in over five years. Yeah. Me too. I can't remember last night. You know, I organized in Vancouver, hearings in 2012. Well, you had Santa Barbara conference. Yeah, yeah, yeah, right, right. But that's JFK. We're talking 9-11. Yeah, the last time I was invited anywhere was the conspiracy conference in 2013. That's when you were at Richard Gage, huh? Yeah, Richard, he was in the front row for my presentation. And that was the last time there was a conspiracy conference. Was he taking notes? No, he didn't. He was. He was. You know, when I spoke at North Dakota, I was introduced by Judge Tuneheim on JFK and Tuneheim took copious notes the whole time. Well, he should. He was, he was, you know, the top gun at the ARB agent. Of course, of course Larry. But he still maintains that the Warren commission basically got it right. I know, I know, I know. Which is incredible. I think, do you think that Doug was sworn in him might have had a falling out? Well, I would be interested in involving Doug. We ought to have Doug on to talk about Tuneheim and others he worked with at the ARB. There's our guest. Doug will. I think Doug retired. I think Doug retired. Doug retired. He's told every JFK researcher. Don't say that. I know he said, he says, don't call me. Don't text me. Don't email me. I'm a huge, I'm a huge Doug Horn fan too. And because of that, because of that, he just said, you know what, you know what? I'm not. Yeah, you're not talking to this. Yeah, he says you're not subitiates. It's been proven. I've read, I read, yeah, five volumes. You know, I've got so many videos on YouTube. If you can't understand it, you know, that's not my problem. Yeah. That's good. All right, I got it. Quick question. I've got him right here at hand. I've got all five volumes right here. And you've noticed lots of tabs in this book. Lots of tabs. That's a good stuff in there. That's right. I've got a lot of highlights, you know, throughout minds. Absolutely. All right, last week, fellas, we, I think we skipped over the significance of something. And so I'm going to go ahead and say. So two big hits. No, if you remember, we were talking about George Bush. All right, so this is a funeral. And we got you mentioned that you should bush there in the back on the steps. And that's a look right. That looks a little strange. Like they might have messed with his face, photo, photo shop, as well. Yeah, this time is convincing as the one in front of the TSB. Right, right, right. It looks like he's done something to the head, Larry. He looks like the cut his neck off, you know, like he has cancer. Yeah, it could be. It could be. You can see all that. I think it was washed, but they distorted the head. Yeah, that's possible. That's possible. Yeah, it looks like the face got, you know, the neck, something, yeah, they, it's kind of a crew. That any job. Yeah, so time you got something for us? Yeah, you want to play a YouTube foot for me here? Yeah, I'll put the link here in the chat. And it's honest, Dr. Tess. OK. We can't see it, Larry. We can't see it. OK, hang on. OK, so this is this is Alex Jones talking about. This is Tommy Robinson that's been going on this week. So this has been a big, this has been a big showfest. The last minute of this is all commercial. So, you know, if we get through three, four minutes, this will be fine. OK, here we go. Yeah. Tommy Robinson, frequent guest of this show, has been disappeared, given 13 months sentence in one hour. And there's a national ban on talking about it. And I've talked to scores of reporters and others who are afraid to even come on air, Fox News, and then talk to his lawyer who said, I can't tell you I'll be arrested. What was Tommy Robinson reporting on? Giant confirmed child kidnapping rings nationwide. Now, you're watching on some TV. You can see this. DredgeReport.com. Oh, look, he's got articles about Tommy Robinson. Activist Tommy Robinson arrested outside UK court. Jail for 13 months on the same day. Third link, judge orders media blackout. Boom, Fox News. Fox News, folks. Something has gone wrong. It seems you clicked on a bad link and scumbled upon a 404 error. But when you see somebody like Tommy Robinson, the 11 years ago was the first person to expose Muslim, grooming, and mass sex-travinging range. Yeah, this was basically the story of how political decision to make commit thought crime. And now being kidnapped off streets of Britain, there was an individual who was quite prominent in the anti-Islamic extremism movement who was going to attend a draw, Mohammed Cartoon contest last week. The police re-arested him for a previous charge, which he had already been released for, in order to prevent him from attending this conference. Literally, just so he wouldn't offend Muslims. So that's still, we've done a report on that outside big bend. That's a massive story. It's going to be up tomorrow before the show. Here have been slave caravans and slave women and slave children being sold. For 6,000 plus years of recorded history in North Africa, in the Middle East and in Central Asia. By the way, there are other cultures who sell in slaves as well. It's just those cultures never came up to the 21st century. So I have a whole stack of mainstream British news. After 11 years of them covering it up, having to admit that, indeed, every major town has thousands of liberal girls and some boys trained, recruited, and then put into sex slavery by age 9, 10, 11. And if the parents, the poor parents get up and he and say, no, the police come and set them up and arrest them and FCPS, Child Protective Services, take their children. They're now having parliamentary hearings on this, so they could cover it up for decades. But because of Tommy Robinson breaking the ice, blowing a hole in the line, being put in prison for a year or five years ago, but this, and not shutting up, others had the courage to go public. So the pedophile rings that run England, that's mainstream news, are really angry. So now they've ordered in the courts that no one report on the trial's period. They don't even say they exist. And so Tommy Robinson was arrested on Friday. He already had a suspended sentence from last year after serving three months in prison. At 13 months of suspended, as long as he quote, wouldn't go into trials and cover them live, which he had been done before, like, should be able to do until a few years ago, anywhere, the left from the world, definitely protect about a failure. He'd go to any other trial he wanted. So he just went outside one. I walked the whole livestream after it was archived and just said they're having a grooming trial here. Didn't say the details, any of that. Now this is all confirmed. We reported on it Friday and Saturday. Fox News has a big article that details it. It's up on info wars.com because they removed the Fox News article. It just disappeared, not corrected. One that judges like to it's just gone. Fox News confirms Tommy Robinson sentenced to 13 months for reporting on pedophile grooming trial. Here's the Fox News article that's been deleted. The link to Drugs is linked to has been deleted. Right wing activist Tommy Robinson reportedly jailed after filming outside child grooming trial. This is Fox News confirming everything we already told you. But it says it's shocking. His lawyer isn't allowed to talk to us. He says this is a police state. My own list is just a afternoon. I was shooting live reports. They were like, Alex, there's not a ban on reporting on Tommy Robinson. And they started commenting and the feed's going, oh, we apologize, there is. Oh my God, you can do that in England? Yeah. All right, talk to us, Don. But of course there was a ban on it. I mean, I've been following this today. And of course, the fact that it was involving Muslims is a major aspect that's being suppressed here. In fact, the mayor of London is suppressing that the violent crimes being committed by Muslims because in part because he's won himself. Yeah, okay, now the, all right. So this is going to take a little unpacking, all right? And this does actually tie back to the JFK assassination. And I will lay that out over the next few weeks. We're going to start with Tommy Robinson and Alex Jones, though. Okay, the level of showing here is really up the charts. Okay, so you've got shill Alex Jones and we've got this fraudulent martyr in Tommy Robinson. Okay, I'm going to, I got a little PowerPoint here. I will see I will. There's what makes him fraudulent, Don. I'm fascinated. Okay, so we'll have a, we have a breakdown here. Let me, we'll do a screen share here. Can you guys see the PowerPoint now? Yes, you can. Go full screen. Yep, well, there we go. There you go. Okay, so here's our boy, Tommy Robinson. And this is his Wikipedia entry. So his real name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley Lenin. It was by the pseudonym Tommy Robinson. Previously, he's been known as Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris. And he's a so-called far right activist who served as spokesman and leader of the English defense league from which he resigned. Yeah, yeah, in 2013, yeah. And I told her 2013 he resigned from the EDL. He's currently serving a 13 month prison sentence for a contempt of court. After he did the, the lot, the Facebook live stream outside the, the, the Muslim grooming trial. Let me ask you this, Don. Yeah, he just wants to show the defendants. These trials are presumably public. I mean, you know, it should be a matter of public record. The crown is trying to suppress the fact that these are Muslims. And therefore they don't, they don't want their faces to be shown because it would be obvious to the public. Well, there's part of that's going on. And part of it is, you know, has to do with, you know, these reminders that were, you know, under, that were for the victims. And, you know, and part of this was, nobody else was out there filling it, but our boy, Tommy was, and he'd already had a suspended sentence to not do this sort of thing. So let's, let's move to the next slide here. This is Tommy's record in 2005, 12 months for assault, 2010. Arrested for public order offense. 2011 convicted for football, who will again, is him, you know, and gets drunk at the soccer game. 2011 breaching bail, 2011 convicted for assault. 2011 jailed for a rooftop protest in Switzerland. Jailed for traveling under a false passport. We hit the set. And a lot of these look like contrived offenses to me, like they're trying to target the guy and smear it. Well, we'll, we'll see. Okay, jailed for mortgage fraud. Okay, now I don't, I haven't looked into that one at all. But, and any event this, this man's had any number of scrapes with the law. So if you would think of a guy like this gotten in front of a judge, they may yank his suspended sentence and throw him in the cooler. You know, okay, so why, so just why exactly was Tommy there in the first place? So what's going on? All right. So basically we now have three million Muslims in England. 25 years ago, we had 950,000, which is a lot, you know, but it's, it's ballooned up to three million. And these, well, these, these, these Muslims, they've imported our, you know, their Arabs, their low IQ beasts from the desert, basically, that are unassailable in, in the modern civilization. So it's causing a huge problem. So there's, there's massive public unrest with all these Muslims. White people are now a minority in London in the city itself. White people are now a minority. And that's how you've got this Muslim mayor, Cedit Khan. And so there's a lot of outrage bubbling underneath the surface here. So we've got to have, so the people are looking for a hero. We need, we need somebody to stand up to this Muslim onslaught. Well, enter Tommy Robinson, but there's a catch. Gary. Bring them. Yeah, that's right. He's Jewish. So any admits it on. See, I don't draw the same inferences. You don't. I mean, the fact that guy is Jewish doesn't tell me didally about what it makes. It gives me a category, but not everything true of the category. Generally, it's true of the individual members. Well, we're, we're, we're, we've got a few more slides to go here yet. So hang on, hang on. Hey, so okay. So here's Tommy admits he's Jewish up here. And then these stands with Israel. I don't care how many people on the far left and far right shall be down for it. I'm an unapologetic Israel supporter. And then this is a little tweet from Israel. This has honestly been the best and most fascinating trip of my life. And here he is with the way this is what he was. Yeah, it was at the wayling wall there. And then this is the English defensely. So he's with the rabbi. And this is when he went to Israel. He met K Wilson. She is, she has some role with like tourist relations or something, I believe. And then yeah, here's down here. We see the English defensely, the true English will never abandon Israel. So the English defensely is actually the English Israel defensely. Yes, yeah. So they don't do much defending of England, but they do do a lot of defending of Israel. Unlike us. Yeah. And then here's Tommy, whereas Mossad and T-shirt. So it's Tommy Mossad? Yeah. Yeah. And the thing that Tommy won't talk about in all this Muslim problem is how did all these Muslims actually get into England in the first place? Did they let themselves in? How what what forced got them in there? Oh, well, when you look under the rock, what do you find? Barbarale learner's specter. Europe has not yet learned how to be Muslim. Why do we have these common grammatical errors? Jews admit they are. That should be T-H-E-Y apostrophe R-E. Well, I'll talk to Scotty and get him to clean his spelling up. Jews are going to meet the center of that. It's a huge transformation to Europe for Europe to make. They are now going into multicultural mode. And Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive. I think it's more like the other way around. Yeah. Europe under the Muslim invasion. Yeah, well, the objective is, is our guy George Soros. Says our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective. And national borders is the obstacle. Jewish billionaire openly advocating the eradication of European borders to accommodate hundreds of thousands of non-Europeans. He would have a report about Soros advocating the dissolution of the borders in European countries on national news tonight. Yeah. Yeah, so George Soros is basically calling for the genocide of white Europeans. Yeah, he's a very bad. Yeah, lots of words that follow. Yeah, he's he's financed, take him down. No, the people that were got all the airtime. That's that's exactly it. So Tommy Robinson as a guy put it by world jewelry to deflect the heat on these mud, you know, on the Muslims. It's okay to blame Muslims for all this, but don't blame the Jews who actually brought them into your country in the first place. And we're manipulating the situation to promote their own interests. Correct. We are the Jewish interest is to exterminate white Europeans. Yeah. And now the Jewish interest seems to be dilute all other cultures with this kind of multi-racialism. So roughly everyone turns out to be sort of light brown in color in the Jewish race emerges to lead them very much as Charles Manson wanted a war between the blacks and the whites. And he believed that because the blacks were stronger, they prevailed. But because they were actually also a dumber, they need leadership and he provide that but coming out from the mountains to lead them. So all right. I have just a couple of screens. I made a few scans of the magazine and come to find out that you can't put that in a PowerPoint. So I'm just going to go ahead and play the pictures real quick. Now this is the one we were talking about. We already have book out. And then. Yeah. Yeah. This I wanted to talk about is a little out of order. What it does say at the top of this, he says, bumbling bureaucracy, responsible and left JFK a target. All right. Nothing bumbling about 15 indications of secret service complicity and saying him up for the yet. That's very meticulously planned. Yeah. Can you read that for just a color paragraphs? Can you see it? But it's too small for decades. Historians will analyze a Warren commission report down to the last tragic detail. But one question will glare forever. How did it happen that a known psychotic command with a Marxist bent who had defected to the USSR and it would work for the US in the US on behalf of Fairplay for Castro's Cuba could possibly have been allowed to go and watch during President Kennedy's visit to Dallas even worse. How was an individual, the fat FBI dossier permitted access with a gun to the Texas Schoolbook repository. Commandiness did with an easy range of scheduled ground of the presidential motorcade. All hooi. This is just, you know, an apology for the Warren report claiming they were mucking it out like on 9-11. It was claimed failure of communication between the C.I. and the FBI allowed the attack by 19 Islamic terrorists under the command of Osama bin Laden off in the cave in Afghanistan to take place. It's just the usual muck coming from the responsible agencies. But they use it even in Puerto Rico. It's all, if you're right, bureaucracy bumbling that is the reason why we can't get anything done. Now that you mentioned Puerto Rico Gary, because I want to talk about this, yes, sir, eventually because as you guys know, you probably read in the newspapers, the Harvard study that came out, which found out that almost 5,000 people died in Puerto Rico as a result of Hurricane Maria. And I just wanted to mention that Jim and I and I don't know if Gary was involved that we did a couple of shows post Maria when I was in Puerto Rico and yeah, I still have that report. I was going on there and my father had who goes to the VA right next to the Veterans Administration building. There is the forensic building that deals with all the deaths and everything. And he had told me and I had passed this information on to Jim and Gary about the quantity of people that were there claiming bodies that had already been, the people that had already had already died in hospitals as a result of electricity and the basic electricity is not being available. And now and at the time the government of Puerto Rico had only been claiming 50 deaths as a result of the storm and Donald Trump went to Puerto Rico and said, oh, you know, you guys should be proud of yourselves. There was only 50 or 60 deaths here compared to Katrina and with 2000. Well, now, you know, and as a result of the study, we were the ones that were right Jim when I was reporting to you and reporting to our audience, but what was really happening in Puerto Rico at the time. Yeah, and it was real the rest. Didn't W. Say something like that to the guy in charge of Katrina Reconstruction doing a great job. What was his name? It was awful. Right. That might work. They were they were being miserable just as in in Puerto Rico. We got to go out there and we got to go out there and we got to go out there and we got to go out. Sorry, why don't you continue with this theme as we conclude the show today? Yeah, well, yeah, that we, you know how many times when I was there and everything and all the suffering that I witnessed and which to me just remembering, you know, the whole situation, there is very traumatic to me. And, you know, I just I just think that, you know, what we went through there and you know, because I was like I said, I was giving you guys reports, you know, from the beginning. In fact, when I was able to finally get through to you and Jim and Gary, you guys know, you know, what we were going through there and how traumatic it was. Being all the suffering and seeing the gas lines and seeing, you know, we were we were we had a curfew and then, you know, as FEMA and the US Army Corps of Engineers dragged their feet, you know, in trying to reestablish communications and trying to reestablish the electrical grid who that was completely wiped out 100% and how chaos was prevalent, you know, in the streets and trying. It's part of it, it's all part of it to allow the mouth down to occur. You want the outtown to occur. Supermarkets, you know, the lines used to get something to eat and everything. I was a witness to all this, you know, but you know, the lifts go on to something else because I have a very short clip here that I wanted to. Sure, I do it now because you were almost to the end of the show. Go ahead and do your clip. Yeah, let me let me cue this up for you guys because I think this is very significant. It's new stuff. Let me see if I can find this actually. Look, while Larry's looking for that, I just have a couple of slides to show real fast. Go ahead. Okay. And we all have completed everything I wanted to do. All right. Now this is in the same magazine they were ported on hard core. All right. So this is the one where we had not connolly taking look framed by frame to basically convince him of what he saw. Now, so they go, you know, through each frame, connolly's looking at them and he isolates between this frame. It's where he was shot. Blah blah blah. However, we've got a man here, the rebuttal of a protagonist of the one bullet vertic. And there you go. He completed the disagrees with it. And there's our man right there. Talk about in charge of the single bullet theory. Let's go with Larry here for the finish. Gary, good job. Good job. Give me a couple. I'm trying to find the clip of a son that's you want me to put it on pause? Yes. Yes, please, please. Okay. I found this clip watching. Let me give an introduction here, short introduction. If you've been a biology student, one of the first things that you learn in biology is about Rachel Carson. Okay. Now, Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, which was an indictment of the companies that produced DDT and other pesticides and how it was affecting the environment. Now, before that, she had written a couple of books about the sea and about, because she was a marine biologist, but then she also, she was an excellent writer, Jim. And she was able to put in writing a lot of her ideas that were in a way that people could understand. Okay. Now, this clip that I'm going to show is right before the publication of her book. Now, what happened here is that excerpts of her book had been published in the New Yorker magazine. And the series of excerpts reached the people and they started to take notice. And so, you know, this is just a portion of a video that I just record off the screen from Netflix. I've watched it. I'm a very big fan of Rachel Carson. Okay. And it's very interesting because it has to do with JFK. And I'll just play it real fast here and let you guys comment if you will. Okay. Am I, you guys see that? Yep. Okay. The leaves and the changes of the roots. Correct the volume. White granular pattern could be seen. Something like earlier, this powder had been dropped to the likes now upon the roofs, to the lawns, to the streams. No, we're trapped. No, we're going to be actually had stuffed out life in this street in the world. This is a Kim Trails of her toy. You're self. Yeah. She creates an image of silence. What would it be like if you woke up in the morning? Anyway, outside. And say, if you're in a dirt's chirp or sing, you heard nothing. And that's so amazing, powerful, right? And just, you know, it's actually trapped. In the zealous quest for mastery, Carson argued. Symptych pesticides had been used in the screen. Accessible, heedlessly, upsetting the delicate balance of nature and putting all life at risk. She felt that proponents of widespread pesticides were conducting an experiment with life itself without having done adequate testing of research to determine what the consequences might be. And that, that's it, isn't pretty. It weren't being informed because the proponents of pesticides weren't telling them only one side of the story and the one that benefited their own interest. And so all of these things are part of the total more consensus by which Americans lived. The benevolence of corporations, the authority of science, well, Carson's challenging all of those things. The fear arose even before the second and third installments of silence spring in the news hands. The New Yorker was deluged with letters. So too, was the USDA. Most of those who wrote the agency spokesman told the New York Times expressed horror and amazement that the use of such toxic chemicals was the agreement. She raised the level of awareness of the general public of all of these chemical applications and why we need to think about their implications. People were deeply moved in front by what she said. Scientists for the chemical industry and the USDA were incensed by Carson's assertions. What they wanted publicly was the death of a soldier against the possibility of any malaria or world hunger. As one industry gem is put it, DETT alone has saved us many human lives over the past 15 years as all the Wonder Drugs combined. The proponents of pesticides argued that we have to take risks to go forward. That's very much part of our scientific and technological culture. They saw themselves as doing something in the higher good. They were fostering human development. They were killing plants. They were making the world a better place. Scientists, there was this benefit through these pesticides. But the whole point of our argument is that there's been a kind of assumption and a rush. The benefits were obvious that people rushed to take advantage of those benefits. But there were these other plans that were making no more as obvious, but actually my outweigh the estimates. By August, with the publication of the book Still More Than Up Away, the controversy over silent spring had reached the nation's capital. And a special science advisory committee had been convened to review all federal policies on pesticides. And August 28th, the subject even tranned its way into one of the President's regular televised press conferences. There have been a growing concern among scientists. It's possible to do dangerous long-range side effects on the likes that you said do you think a hundred pesticides? As you consider asking, are my mic culture right public health service bigger culture looking for this? Yes, and I know that they already are. I think they have questioned his thoughts as well, but they are. Jim, you can add. I just want to stop here for a minute here, Jim, because I think that JFK is being extremely coy in acknowledging the problem here and where he's obviously saying, look, we know about this sole situation. It's sort of like, we don't want to let the cat out of the bag. I suspect you're right. Given his demeanor here in the way he was so cautious, he's hardly very relaxed in speaking, but in this case, not very chemistry. Yes, yes, because look who he's taking on. They mentioned how worried the people made the pesticides work. When President Kennedy said, we're going to look into this. We're going to reach in to the private sector and see if we need to regulate these products in a different way. That was a threat. That's a threat to the bottom line. That's a threat to the business that these companies work in. Therefore, since it will work out, you get together and develop a propaganda campaign, the discredit cars and the discredit the science in their book, and to defend their practices. Right. Rachel Carson was a conspiracy theorist of her time. As you know, I think that we can add to the long list of enemies that JFK had before the assassination, all these corporations, these companies that produce all these pesticides. And I think you mentioned some of those the other day when I spoke to you, Jim. I think that's an impeccable point where we need to pursue it. I'd also like for us to invite someone who's an expert on chemtrails because I think there are a modern variation potentially even more threatening than DDT and the other pesticides that preoccupied her at the time. Yeah, well, you know, something that, you know, and what it impresses me is that JFK was so informed on this problem, Jim. I remember he was a speed reader. He was a voracious reader. Yeah, yeah, and then he would say, hey, you know, I'm all aware of Ms. Carson's book. And the book I already had conversation with her in private hasn't even been published yet. Yeah, you got it. Agreed. I think Raphael is the only one to talk to when it comes to chemicals, to chemtrails. She is the authority. So there's another tip and another possibility, you know, another enemy. I agree, Larry. I think it's a great take on your part. Good catch. You're right. I think you want to take us out. Yeah, it's time. I think we had a good show. This is JFK show number 197. All right. We'll see you next week. Guys, appreciate all your input. Adios, amigo.