Christine Massey Demands Answers From CHD Who Consistently Fails To Provide Pathogenic Virus Science

Video Transcript:

to the alleged virus by asking what science you're relating, a line on you giving no answers whatsoever. And then you put me in touch with Jay Kuhi, the Kuhi you and Jay Gold told me that Jay was a CHD science consultant. Jay Kuhi also was not able to cite a shred of science. And then on one of his videos about two months ago, he admitted that for the last 20 years, Verology has been based on indirect observations of things that Verology's cannot even prove exists. This is your science consultant saying this. So my question, what is CHD's current position on the alleged virus? Does it exist? Yes or no? And if yes, then what science are you relating on? I don't know that I can answer that in a way that you will find satisfying. I think we're open to the idea that there's not a virus. We're open to the idea that there is a virus. We write about both dimensions to that. Jay Kuhi is somebody who has studied virology. And so I think he is and has been delving more deeply in that. I don't we're trying to cover the issue. I don't think we've stated that there is a virus. We haven't stated that there's not a virus. We're exploring what the reality is. And we clearly agree with you that there are very serious problems with the narrative. I don't think we have to thin advance on a lot of this. Bobby's writing about the virus. You're, you're, you're, you're, you're, say, this full of content about a virus, you know, function, Robert Kennedy Jr. has a whole book coming out about the origin of so-called COVID. You have not been dealing with this in a balanced way. You gave, or you had David Ratz, and it can make a wall of convent time. And I think there's one presentation with Alex Eker. One other, one other something on your website. Compared to hundreds and hundreds, maybe thousands of articles, interviews, conversations about COVID-19 as if it's a real phenomenon. So with all due respect, you have not been, you have not been helping at all. You've been extremely one-sided, which to me is just blatantly unethical, unlawful. You're misleading your people rely on you guys for accurate information. And they think for God's sake, if there was no virus, for all people's children's health defense would be mourning us. It's what it's been like for the last three years. It's been like having another layer of government to have to deal with. To dispel the nonsense coming out of your organization. Because there's like a lot of people who have to lie to you. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. So I appreciate that. With all due respect, I brought on Andy Calveman and Tom Calan to debate this with some of the other scientists who are on this call. And it wasn't as fruitful as I would have hoped. And like I say, this is still something that we want to hear. I'm sorry, it's disappointing to you.