JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (5-8-19) Wikileaks Moon Landing footage,neocons losing

Video Transcript:

When you attend the funeral, it is sad to think that sooner or later those who love will do the same for you. And you may have thought it's tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the weeping they will do, but don't you worry, no more ashes, no more sackful, and an arm band made a black cloth, will someday never more adorn asleep, for it's the bomb that drops on you. Get your friends and neighbors to. There'll be nobody left behind to agree, and we will all go together when we go. What I come for, being backslad is to know. Universe, Sunday, Readman, and inspiring achievements, yes we all will go together when we go. We will all go together when we go. All set used with an instant decimble low. No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance. Lloyd De Blondon will be loaded when they go. We will all cry together when we cry. We'll be French play, Potatoes play, play. There will be no more misery when the world is our own history, yes we all will cry together when we cry. We will all think together when we think, there'll be nobody present at the way. For it's a disappointment in that grand incineration, nearly three billion months of well-done stay in campus. We will all go together when we go. And let there be no morning of the bar, just sing out a TV on when you see that ICBM and the party will be on as you are. This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the raw deal. I've just discovered the WikiLeaks released the moon landing footage of cut scenes that looks to me to be completely authentic. You can find it in judge for yourself online, again the title, WikiLeaks releases moon landing cut scenes filmed. No wonder they're after Julian Assange. We have lots of scenes at the astronaut, they're on the set, you have the directors, you have the stage hands on the set. You got one place where the photographer is adjusting his camera. I'm looking at it now. You have another where a member of the crew lean forward and says I declare this land. Now he's going to declare the moon scene, the sound stage for the moon scene. Here's the WikiLeaks, let me see how long it runs. You won't be able to see it until you watch the video version of today's show. But I'm going to play just a little bit of it. I claim this land to the name of the moon. Now move. And you can see the flag waving even though the moon has no atmosphere. The moon is moving. It's really stunning. It seems to me that this is about the time they decided to go after Julian Assange. There's another frame where you can see in the foreground there's the moon landing set where the lighting structure is extending forward. Anyone who wants to understand how this was gone, we already had an indication in Capricorn 1 of film released in 1978 with James Rowland, Sam Waters and Nojay Simpson. It's really something about a purported mission to Mars where just before the spacecraft is to be launched, they discovered there was a flaw in the plan and they would have all died before they got back. So what they got to do is take it. And the astronauts take a while to sort it out, but then they realize this is a big prod game of which they do not want to be a part. And they make an escape and they go in three different directions. It's a wonderful film. It's a story line here, but the way they succeeded was by using a single grainy feed for the television outlet. And that's what happened here. Now I got hooked on the moon landing story in 2001 when my wife and I visited London. We stayed in a morgan hotel, which I picked on Bluseberry Street because my wife's name was Morgan. And it backs onto the British Museum. And we were checking the BBC channels when I discovered all of a sudden I was seeing a whole lot of objective scientific proofs that we had never gone to the moon. So I recommend because it's still just chalk fall. It's wonderful conspiracy theory. Did we land on the moon? You can find it online in this one image. I'm just going to a boot print. And I think that's very telling in it's part of a dilemma. My personal opinion is since there was no atmosphere and no moisture on the moon, that moon dust would have been no more susceptible of retaining imprints than the sands of the Sahara. So when you see imprints, that seems to me to falsify the claim that this was done on the moon. On the other hand, if it would retain imprints, we have plenty of photos of the moon rover, for example, that has no tracks in front, no tracks behind no tracks in the middle. So that unless it was set down with a crane. It can't have got there on its own. It can't have driven there because otherwise you'd have moon tracks. So there's a dilemma. The other of moon dust can retain tracks in which case the moon rover without tracks refute its authenticity or the moon dust cannot retain tracks as I believe in which case the moon boot, and the impression refutes its authenticity. And indeed, interestingly, in some of the shots where you can actually see an impression, there is the impression of a sneaker of a tennis shoe that no astronaut was wearing on the moon. So this whole thing, you know, is a monstrous deception. And I think Julian Assange is doing what Julian Assange does, releasing classified data that exposes deception fraud and fakery by, in this case, the American government. I highly recommend the second edition of what is my favorite book of all the books we published that doesn't know. And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, which was like four or five chapters that weren't in the original. I highly recommend it. Absolutely sensational stuff. And of course, from Moon Rock books. And by going there, by purchasing our books, you're helping us with our legal fight against a Leonard Posner in the deep state because Lenny has been a deep state Charlottes and removing. He's actually boasted tens of thousands of content items from the internet where one of my blogs or one of my videos. What count is only one content item. So Lenny's been advancing the program of censorship for the deep state with great skill and agility. The guys, I got to acknowledge the guys some kind of genius when it comes to the internet. Mike Codefendate Dave Geherry, who was with me on our show last Friday. And I have both found, but Dave in particular now that items are simply disappearing out of his email. Well, I have no doubt that this would be Lenny Posner is doing. It certainly looks that way to me. Meanwhile, CBS News, New York Times reporters suggest US scrap free speech in favor of New Zealand's style censorship. Think about that. Remember after the latest fake shooting in New Zealand, which was so bad, so amateurish, they actually had to make it illegal to possess a copy of the film because it was so obvious, so blatant that this wasn't real. I mean, to me, it's just stunning how badly it was done. We're here to for I suppose the most amateurish was in Boston where you have the police on Bullhorns calling out, this is unreal. This is a drill. We had the Boston Globe tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities and why did the defense attorney for the Zoker Serenop not introduce that is obvious proof that they work guilty. And with the cameras zoom in through the smoke, you see, yes, bodies lying there with missing arms and legs, what there is no plot. As Lorraine Day, MD who is in charge of trauma surgery from San Francisco General Hospital for 25 years, I'm served that's a physiologic one possibility. You can't have arms and legs, well not by explosives and there be no blood in New Zealand. You can't have people shot with shotguns and there be no blood, but that's exactly what you have going on and you can't have piles of bodies before the shooter enters the room. That's more of what you had going on in New Zealand. Meanwhile, CBS News released a propaganda statement on Monday featuring New York Times tech supporter Cecilia Cang, where they suggested the U.S. government could do an end run around the First Amendment through strict regulations in order to suppress hate speech and this information online. That's what they're doing. If they hate what you're saying, no doubt because it's an inconvenient truth. They don't want revealed to the public. They describe it as hate speech and then they seek to ban it. But the whole point of the First Amendment is to all speak no matter how offensive to be shared. Was it Jefferson who said, I may hate every word you say, but I'll defend to the death you're right to say it. I mean, it's outrageous. It's going on here when you have mediocrities like this person, Cecilia Cang, who has said the U.S. should look to countries like Australia, New Zealand, Germany, and India, which do not have free speech as models for the suppression of speech on the Internet. How bad is that? The New York Times editorial board even wrote a prompt again to be comparing right wingers to G-Hot-As conservative voices as G-Hot-As research investigators conspiracy researchers like myself and demanded authoritarian censorship of the Internet to stop the spread of toxic ideas. Like the idea of the toxic idea that we didn't go to the moon that was all fabricated and faked. I mean, I've done so much on this. Check out, for example, my interview with Dennis Camino on the great moon landing folks, where we explained how we didn't have the propulsion power. We didn't have the computing power. We couldn't have made it through the Van Allen radiation belt. I mean, it's all just a manifest absurdity. And now we're getting from WikiLeaks more direct confirmation by outtakes from the moon landing footage. A New York Times last year hired virulent anti-white racist Sarah Jorng in August of 2018 as her lead technology writer and made her a member of the editorial board. This is so disgraceful. Thomas Effing White people marking up the Internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants. This is what this woman hired by the New York Times. I mean, I'm telling you, the New York Times isn't fit to line your garbage bags. And it's kind of sick. How much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men. This is Sarah Jorng. Jorng's Twitter featured her attacking dumbass Effing White people. Then you have now this major move by Facebook, where Louis Ferricle and Alex Jones and other dangerous voices have been banned by both Facebook and Instagram. Facebook announced Thursday, just last Thursday, it had designated some high profile people, including Nation of Islam, leader Louis Ferricle, who is notorious for using anti-Semitic language. And right when conspiracy theorists Alex Jones as dangerous and said it will be purging them from its platform. I never really quite understood this anti-Semitism thing because the people I'm hearing aren't being anti-Semitic when that's properly understood. That is to discount the value of the opinions or the words of the person just because of the religious legacy or their faith as in this instance Jews or Muslims or Christians or Rosa Crucions or Seventh-day Adventists or Mormons for crying out loud. Unless you're directly discounting someone because on the basis of their being a Jew because they're a Jew you aren't committing anti-Semitism. If you're criticizing Israel because it's slaughtering Palestinians, that is not anti-Semitic, that's speaking the truth. But because it's an inconvenient truth it's going to be characterized as hate speech and because it's Zionists, now such a massive influence on the Internet, don't be surprised if it's taken down. Jones and his media outlet info wars had previously been banned from Facebook in August of 2018. But it maintained a presence on Instagram which is owned by Facebook. On Thursday however, Jones and Info Wars are going to be banned from Instagram as well. What's the point of all this? They don't want us to be capable of thinking things through. Alex Jones isn't a deep thinker but he's provocative. He would get you thinking about things you would otherwise think about. As I've emphasized here so many times scientific reasoning is a process or procedure of four steps or stages of first is puzzlement. Something doesn't fit into your background knowledge and you try to figure that out. And the second is speculation. You start thinking about all the alternative possible explanations and mighty counter it. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. The first time I've seen a lot of this in my book, I think it's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. And so, what's the point of all this? Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. Well, I think that's the point of all this. As you may have heard by now, a several personalities, including Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Lumer, Gavin McGinnis, my Louis, my Louis, you know, Paulus and Louis Farrican were permanently be deplatformed by Facebook on Thursday, with the most heavily sanctioned entity being Alex Jones, Info Wars, which had already been deplatformed last year. Like the others, Paul Joseph Watson had never broken Facebook rules, but as an associate of Alex Jones and Info Wars, he was deemed guilty by association. Like him, you too can now be banned from Facebook for sharing too many stories from the Info Wars website. And by the way, I was cut off for my Facebook site about a year ago, possibly longer, though I still get notices that people are posting there, I can't get there. What was really sick is that the usual suspect far left outlets like Buzzfeed and full coordination with Facebook. Publish their stories about this nasty platforming before many of the de-platformees were even aware they'd been de-platformed. The entire move was actually rolled out as a celebratory publicity stunt. CNN's Nicaragua-born never-trump for Republican Anna Navarro was ready to go Thursday afternoon on ABC's The View, cheerleading Facebook and commenting about the de-platformees. I want them shut down. I want them silenced. I want them muted. I think they're horrible for our society. Well, I think this woman, this nut job, Ben Navarro, who's totally an American and anti-democratic, doesn't believe in the Constitution. We don't be better off without our views, but frankly, I don't want to ban anyone. I want to let her have her peace and everyone else, because as her Karl Popper observed, long ago, the greatest instrument in discovering the truth is rational debate, rational debate, providing evidence and argument to support your point of view of critiquing. Others point of view their providing evidence and argument in support of their point of view critiquing your point of view. They want to cut it off. They want to cut it off, because they know their side is so weak that the stories we get from the government about the Moonlandy, JFK, 9-11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, cannot stand up to critical debate. They can't withstand critical dissection. They can't withstand intellectual analysis. So they take the cowardly way out, the brute's way out, the thugs way out, the knitwitz way out, by simply suppressing the alternative. This has nothing to do with truth. This has everything to do with power and control. Tucker continues, but he's indeed that globalist engine known as Silicon Valley appears to be proceeding at a fast cliff with our Chinese style social credit form of political and behavioral control, directing like Hillary Clinton in one of the 2016 election. The upside is the fertile discussion now unfolding with mathematician Kathy Neal Heiss in tweeting to remind us that US tax dollars funded the precursor to Facebook, the largest DARPA's life log project that the American people are technically the owners of its R&D. Chance, how was this gifted to Zuck and Jack? How dare these platforms limit speech when the US taxpayer funded the research and development? For his part, President Trump issued multiple tweets deploying the banning in the demonetization of several internet personalities in recent years saying, I am concerned to monitor the censorship of American citizens on social media platforms. This is the United States of America. And we have what's known as freedom of speech. We are monitoring and watching closely, which I think is sensational. I mean, this was such a stunning move that was so brazen as to track the attention of everyone, even one of the most preoccupied figures in the world, and the president of the United States. To which Paul Joseph Watson responded, pithily, thank you, Mr. President. Now, hopefully Facebook will be stripped of its immunity under Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act because it is clearly acting as a partisan publisher and not a platform. This is election meddling. Watson is referring to Section 230 tucked inside a 1996 law that attempted to regulate pornography. Section 230 is also known as the Internet Freedom and Family Empowerment Act, which takes, in part, no provider or user of an interactive computer service should be treated as the publisher or speaker or any information provided by another information content provider in other words. This section immunizes both ISPs and Internet users from liability for torts committed by others using their website or online forum, meaning this gives immunity to Facebook, YouTube, and other of the social media platforms, even if the provider fails to take action after receiving actual notice of the Harmful or Offensive Content. In other words, when they were acting as the commons as common ground available to every American, it was like a library. You put up your own blog, you put up your own YouTube, you put up your own commentary. That's just you exercising your freedom of speech as an American citizen. And the provider was not held liable for any content or assertion that you presented. That was the way it should have been, that was the way it was meant to be. That's what they're shutting down now. In other words, Dr. Continues, there is no U.S. law forcing these big tech behemoths to impinge on the law of the land. That being the first amendment. These tech and giant censorship initiatives are purely extra-due to you, Disho, meaning they have no basis in the law. Their actions therefore make them publishers and not the public square-type platforms they claim to be and as publishers, they would be subject to an altogether different set of laws, including copyright infringement, which alone if in force could shut down all social media instantly. Meanwhile, we have Donald Trump. Trump attacked social media companies after Facebook bans. Donald Trump criticized social media companies after Facebook banned a number of extremist figures declaring that he was monitoring and washing closely. Trump tweeted and retweeted complaints Friday and Saturday, he said he would monitor the censorship of American citizens on social media platforms. He has previously asserted the social media companies exhibit bias against conservatives, something the company has rejected is untrue, but it's obvious. It's obvious. No one following the internet could have any doubt about it. And you may or may not recall that in advance of the midterms, the latest poll from Rasmussen showed Trump at 50%, or even at a 40% approval from the black community because they're actually benefiting from the actions of this present. And I predicted that Trump would take three or four seats in the Senate and hold the house. It turned out differently, which has puzzled me, until relatively recently, Google acknowledged it altered its algorithms, and may have shifted as many as 76 million votes in favor of the Democrats. That was the hidden variable of which I was at the time unaware. Trump ought to have picked up three or four seats in the Senate, Trump ought to have held the house. But it was Google's intervention, which, by the way, is manipulating the outcome of an election. This is supposed to be the horrendous action of the Russians who had nothing to do with our election. Remember that Chief Executive Officer at Google testified to Congress that the total amount of the Russians had spent on the election was $4,700 about as much as he drops on an executive buffet for the officers at Google. But here was Google manipulating the outcome of an American election by using their algorithm to shift 76 million votes. American people ought to ponder who is a real enemy. It isn't Russia. The President's comments came after Facebook. This week, Mandelius, Veracon Alex Jones, another extremist. And of course, one man's extremist is another man's freedom fighter, seeing the violated his ban on dangerous individuals. Dangerous individuals? The company also removed right-wing personalities, Paul Neelan, Milo-Yapalanta, Paul Joseph Watson, and Laura Lumer, along with Jones' site, Info Wars, which often post conspiracy theories to stimulate our thinking, to provoke us into pondering what's really going on for which I have applauded him in the past. The latest man applied both to Facebook's main service and Instagram and extends the fan pages and other related accounts. I mean, this is just completely outrageous. Outrages. Meanwhile, every nation on Earth must declare war against big tech and call the action from Mike Adams. Mike Adams is a wonderful guy. This guy is someone to whom you should pay attention. Check out Mike Adams. Follow his word. Meanwhile, in the purely political arena, Trump says he discussed the Russian hoax in a phone call with President Trump telephone, President Vladimir Putin of Russia on Friday, for what both men described as a lengthy, positive conversation in which they dismissed two years of investigations in Russia's intervention into the 2016 presidential campaign as a Russian hoax, in a moment that ended up being a mouse. He really meant Russia hoax, the Russia hoax. You can read about it, for example, in Greg Jarrett's brilliant book, The Russia Hoax, or you can watch it in my video, The Russia Hoax comes apart at the scenes, in which I take you through the whole case from A to Z, on 153news.net. Meanwhile, a UK court sentences, Julie and Assange, to a year in jail for jumping bail. A British judge, sentence Wiki Leaks founder, Julie and Assange, on Wednesday to 50 weeks in prison for skipping bail seven years ago, and holding up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Now bear in mind, you may not have heard the first words on the Wiki Leaks video about releasing the cuts from the moon landing filming footage. But it said Wiki Leaks founder, Julie and Assange, has been responsible for releasing more classified documents than anyone else in history. And that's by, you know, a hundred fall. This guy is our savior, until actually he's doing his best to keep him unsinformed of what's really going on, which, manifestly, is not being done by the name screen media, whether it's a New York Times or NBC or CBS, and most certainly is not being advanced by Facebook or Google or YouTube. It's completely outrageous. The judge said it was hard to imagine a more serious violation. A version of the offense has gave the 47-year-old hack or a sentence close to the maximum of a year in custody. I don't know that Julie and Assange has done any hacking. The Russians didn't do any hacking. It was Seth Rich, who leaked the data from the DNC server. I mean, this is just stunning stuff. She pointed out that he had not surrendered willingly. It was only facing the court because the government of Equator are with Stuart's protection last month, which appears to me to coincide with the time that Julie and was releasing the footage from about the moon landing. Now listen, I don't know why Trump hasn't played this over and over, but this is Barack Obama before the 2016 election guaranteeing us that our elections could not be hacked. Listen. Why it's hesitant to play, I do not know. Okay. They just took down. There's interference going on here. I'm not surprised. Lenny Posner is an Internet genius, and I think he, you know, I wouldn't surprise me in the least. Let me see if I can get my slides back up and get us back on the air as we need to be for the discussion today. But, you know, I anticipate that this is not the first and what the last time I encounter a problem of this character because of the intervention of this person whom I find truly offensive. Here we go. Let's see if it'll happen. Okay. Let's see if we can get up to where we were. There was the Julian. There we have a Facebook. There we have talker. Here we have Trump talking to Putin. And here we have Barack Obama. There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even, you could even rig America's elections. And so, I think that's the first thing that I think is that Trump is not going to be in the world because of the hate of Trump because they're so decentralized and the numbers of votes in the wall. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time. And so, I think that's the first thing that I think is going to be a very important and important thing to do is to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure that the American people benefit from an effective government. And it would be my job to welcome Mr. Trump. Regardless of what he said about me or my differences with him on my opinions. And escort him over to this and that's what I think is going to be about. And so, I think that's what I think is going to be about. And so, I think that's what I think is already great. One way of weakening America, making it less great is if you start betraying those basic American traditions that have been bipartisan. And and help to hold together this democracy and to help the people who have been right there. Barack Obama sharing the country was impossible to hack our elections before the 2016 election and then Hillary Clinton comes on claiming the Russians hacked our election. We should have been hearing that tape over and over and over again. And I've mentioned before, Greg Jarrett's brilliant North Russia hopes the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton framed Donald Trump. More coming. Here's a wonderful statement wrong doesn't become right. An evil doesn't become good just because it's accepted by a majority. Technically, it's known as the appeal to popular sentiments, namely the argument that most people believe it's true. Therefore, it's true. It's a fallacy. Even if most people believe the earth was flat, that didn't mean the earth was flat. Meanwhile, the US-Butnik news, along with RT and RSTV, one of the three great international news services, sought me out to interview me about what's going on here in the United States, which they published under the title, public is wary of false allegation and empty promises from Democrats, Professor. US President Donald Trump is children in the Trump Organization to file lawsuits against the Americans in Congress and leaders from Democratic led committees in Congress about their links to the family business. Sputnik spoke with James Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer and Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota. Sputnik. President Trump is filed a legal action against Deutsche Brank and Capital One over subpoenas from Democratic led committees to Congress about their links The Democrat Party suffered a massive political hit with the exoneration of the President from allegations of collusion between Russia and his campaign, which have proven to be baseless. But after over two years of nonstop propaganda promising that the Mueller investigation would lead to his indictment and removal from office, many who became true believers in the fictional narrative or distraught, and the party is desperately attempting to recover, making new allegations of alleged financial improprieties appears to be an effort to regain control of the political narrative and to create a new basis for further attacks upon the candidate who beat Hillary Clinton's spot-knick. In your view, why is the President undertaking such counteroffensive measures against the move now? Concert. As an international businessman, Trump depends upon confidentiality as an indispensable element in managing a worldwide enterprise of hotels and other venues where he has no interest in allowing himself to become the recipient of another Democrat-inspired political witch hunt. In this instance, there could be substance to these allegations of improper dealings with Deutsche Bank and Capitol War. But any reasonable observer has to suspect this is another left-wing attempt to undermine an administration that has been extremely successful by economic and other measures, including appointing two new justices to the Supreme Court. He's determined to fight it. Sputnik. Deutsche Bank has already said they remain committed to providing appropriate information to all authorized investigations and will abide by a court order regarding such investigations. In your view, how legal is this? That's right. The law provides processes and procedures for obtaining documents and records from financial institutions with the approval of duly constituted authorities, in particular, on the basis of subpoenas approved by the appropriate courts. That no doubt will take place here because the target of the investigation is such a prominent position as the President of the United States. It is difficult to ignore the fact that equally prominent figures in the Democrat Party have not been subjected to high-profile scrutiny, especially Hillary Clinton. Miranda paid a play operation on behalf of the Clinton Foundation as Secretary of State, which Wayne Madsen and others have documented. Sputnik. In your opinion, who would benefit from thoroughly checking every aspect of Trump's personal finances, Fatser? The appointment of a special counsel to investigate Trump in his campaign was conducted in violation of the protocols of the Department of Justice, which required the specification of a crime that has been committed prior to appointment. What was taking place, however, was a counterintelligence investigation, which was technically under the direction of the President himself. Since there was no crime to investigate, there was no justification in the appointment to begin with, moreover, as Trump himself has observed in a brilliant tweet, how can he be held responsible for activities, even if they involve Russia that took place under the Democrats and Obama? Sputnik. What's the probability this investigation will have a negative impact on the Democrats, rather than on the Republicans? Why, Fatser? The public has grown weary of false allegations and empty promises from the Democratic Party, which may or may not move in the direction of impeachment. Mueller's conclusion of no collusion has had virtually no impact on the GOP base, which stands with Trump, or on the Democrat base, which continues to oppose him. But it does appear to be affecting independents who are moving in Trump's direction. If the Democrats do not try to impeach him, they may forfeit public confidence in the notion that they stand up for their beliefs. On the other hand, if they do attempt to impeach, then the Senate is, when the Senate is staunchly in his corner, it will come across as a waste of time and effort. Sputnik. What can we suppose about the outcome of this investigation, Fatser? There are already more than 20 candidates vying for the Democratic Party nomination in 2020. With a possible exception of Tulsi Gabbard, none of them appears to have the least chance of defeating a man, who has proven himself to be a masterful politician in public relations genius. Bacchimola Harris appears to have been the anointed one to carry the identity politics message of the party forward. The jussie small fiosco has done her and others, including Michelle Obama, damage that will endure. This latest move therefore has to be understood in the context of a Democratic Party that's lost its way and is grasping after straws to make a case against a man who turns out to be a better politician than anyone expected. Meanwhile further poll results that substantiate my opinion. Democrats should be wary polls show most Americans don't want impeachment. It's no secret, most congressional Democrats hate President Don Jay Trump to the point that they've developed Trump's arrangement syndrome. They will do anything, literally anything, to get him out of office. Not wanting to wait until the 2020 presidential election to house some liberal lawmakers and Democratic presidential contenders, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Kamala Harris are calling for his impeachment. On a recent ABC news poll shows just how foolhardy initiating this drastic action would be. According to the poll, only 37% of people in the United States said they believe Trump should be impeached. The blaze reported this is the lowest number proclaiming the president should be impeached in this particular poll's history. Before the highly anticipated Mueller report was released, 41% of those poll stated Trump should be impeached. And in August of last year, a much larger 49% of those surveyed said impeachment should be brought against the president. And the most recent poll, however, greater than half of Americans are whopping 56% said Trump should not be impeached. Besides being asked if Trump should be impeached, those responded. We're also asked if they thought president obstructed justice. Intriguingly, a lot more Americans responded to Trump obstructed justice than wanted him impeached. 47% of those surveyed said they believe the president obstructed justice while 41% claimed he didn't obstruct justice. Just 31% of those polls cited with the president that the Mueller report completely exonerated him. However, 53% of respondents claimed the Mueller report didn't entirely clear Trump of all charges. In March of this year, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated it was not worth it to impeach Trump. Or comments were made after the Mueller report was released at the time, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer agreed with Pelosi's sentiments. They know it's going to cost them more politically than they would gain because they can't gain an impeachment in any case. Meanwhile, we have a number of developments in the area of foreign affairs. Pompeo says Russia, China, behind the feet of Zenozawayl-Aku. Notice here you have the Secretary of State of the United States acknowledging that the United States was seeking to engineer a coup in Venezuela and that it had been brought to a halt. When the Venezuelan coup attempt launched earlier Tuesday, the administration likely didn't figure on having to justify its failure. When officials were loudly endorsing what they'd done, Operation Libertade, meaning Operation Freedom. Where, once again, we have the United States proclaiming that it's seeking to bring freedom and democracy to a country that already has democracy. Venezuela, like Syria, like the Ukraine, has a constitution and democratically elected president. That's right. Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela was just reelected to his second term as president by a whopping majority of 60 to the closest competitor, 20%. West Asia's Bashar al-Assad is a democratically elected president of Syria who enjoys the support of 70-80% of the Syrian people more than any recent American president. And of course, it was Victorian Newland working on behalf of the deep state and the Neocons who ran an operation in Ukraine using five billion U.S. taxpayers dollars to create unrest and drive out the democratically elected president of the Ukraine to install a puppet, a Western puppet, and his wife, how is this bringing freedom and democracy to anyone? By evening, the operation had failed. And Secretary St. Mike Pompeo took to CNN to try to pin the blame on Russia and China for meddling, for meddling while claiming the U.S. was very close to getting the regime change it wanted. He had an airplane on the tarmac. He was ready to leave this morning as we understand it. Pompeo said claiming Russia called Maduro and convinced him to stay. He further claimed Maduro is surrounded by Cuba. Pompeo added that he's warned both Russia and Cuba. It is unacceptable to star people. Though it seems the coup has failed at this point. Pompeo claims it remained incredibly fluid and that anything is liable to still happen. But this is a completely absurd account. And when we return from the break, we have a wonderful piece by the saker. Behold the breathtaking weakness of the empire using Venezuela as the illustrative example fascinating stuff. It appears the United States has gone more than one bridge too far. And we're now so weak we can't maintain our status as an empire any longer or impose our will on other states. Where nevertheless we seem to be acting in a provocative fashion especially in the mid leagues. Which as I shall explain appears to be an attempt to bring about a false flag attack that could be blamed on Iran. Or when we return after this break. Welcome to Revolutionary Area where you, the listeners are, and you shall here have Revolutionary Area we present. We will be warm and cast hours of losing information each and every day. Revolutionary Area never sleeps. Revolutionary Area is worldwide and borderless information. Revolutionary Area is also a commercial free. Revolutionary Area is supported 100% by you, the listeners. And that's why we need to give you to donate and support this station and its expenses. You can support us in many available options like our high subscriptions, our seed packs selections, or even my woodworking store. And we also even have Revolutionary's swag at the Revolutionary Area's asyls store when you get t-shirts, coffee cups, even a baby one to order you to just plain donate to the cars. You cannot continue without your support and your support will go out to the bills. So please if you want to just continue please stop by our station support page and drop the dime on us. Revolutionary Area, we have information never sleeps. Was it a conspiracy? Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting this isn't real. This is a drill on bull hordes during the marathon. That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bombsquad activities. And the one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the globe had announced. Appearing through the smoke you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood. The blood only showed up later and came out of the tube. They used amputee actors and astunio quality smoke machine. Toe fled to herself be played. Check out and nobody died in Boston either available at moonrockbooks.com. That's moonrockbooks.com. If you're not safe, you have the necessary information to assist you in conflict with living through just about any survival situation. The surviving and gardening, off-grid living, medical knowledge or even natural and man-made e-m-piece on your list of personal concerns. Do you have your documents in your personal information as safe place in your hands where you know where it is? Well, check out our re-loaded e-m-p groups thumb drive. Over three gigs of survival documents and howtos plus the USDA offline food preservation website and much more, including a surprise bonus. We just can't tell you about it. With plenty of room left over to story your most important documents. Imagine if a megabyte research computer failure took out your bank or all the banks of that matter. Are your bank your records safe in your hands? So when they get things fixed and repaired, you can say, hey, look, this is what I had. You have it. I want it back. Because your personal data safe, family records, addresses, phone numbers, squeeze on over to freedomslips.com. Yes, that's do we do we do we do freedomslips.com. Click the banner on the homepage for the e-m-p group bullet drive to get the full scoop of everything that we offer. So folks, keep your data safe for your peace of mind. RevolutionRadio FreedomSlips.com. You don't need to expect us. We're already here. This is the people of war. It is our war. We are the fighters. Fight it then. Fight it with all it is in us. May God defend the right. Warning, warning. We cannot stop us. We're going to kill us all. Do you know how the time of you sagging? We cannot stop or we'll be the needed, just bring it in. We're going to organize every day anyone. Or you would be alive. We're going to have a great chance to receive these things all the way. We're going to get things done again. We're going to get things done for it. We can't even handle the things we're worth. And you can't just bring your money to cross the gear and the problem we do. Lest the fear be clean and communities remained being committed to police issue. It is free. This is what we do. jullieToc Radio stations are open to us. The bad things of the machine were first hit information in the city, called down the Under Empress. I just started feeling uncomfortable. Then it got worse and I started a little habit. If you're not using extended by does a preventative supplement, maybe it's time to start. To order, call 1-877-928822 or visit harddrop.com. Extend your life with the stand-go fight! The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and colon listeners, or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed that. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlims.com, its staff or affiliates. If you're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlims.com, 100%, this is their supported radio, and now we return you to your host. Well, before the break, I mentioned the sacred, had a brilliant piece on the breathtaking weakness of the Empire. Here it is. The Empire has suffered painful defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq, but one has to admit that those are tough countries to crack. The Empire also appears to have lost control of Libya, but that is another complex country, which is very hard to control. We also saw all the pathetic coughing and puffing with North Korea. Well, let's be honest, the US never stood a chance to bully the North Korean to submission. Never mind invading the regime changing it. Syria was much weaker, but here Russia ran in Hezbollah and did a world-class job of repelling all the Anglo-Zionist attacks, political and military. Besides, I for one will never blame Trump for not listening to Bolton and not triggering World War III over Syria yet. But Venezuela? No Hezbollah or a ran-backing Maduro there. And Venezuela's way too far away from Russia to allow her to do what she did in Syrian fact. Venezuela is in the proverbial backyard of the US and is surrounded by hostile puppet regimes, ones where we succeeded in working our will on them long ago. And yet tonight, it appears that the US puppet Guido is failed in his coup attempt. Moon of Alabama, another commentator, well worth reading, did a great job covering the events of that day so I will refer you to the excellent article, Venezuela. Random Guayados' new coup attempt turns out to be a dangerous joke. I fully concur that today's coup was both a joke and very dangerous. Russian Rears can also check out this article by Visgallad, which also gives a lot of interesting details, including the fact that Guado launches coup from the Colombian embassy in Kurokos. But the thing that amazes me the most tonight is a truly breathtaking pathetic weakness of the clowns who launched this latest failed operation. Pompeo and Mr. Maga, check them out. Let's begin with Pompeo. According to him, the coup failed because of Russia, what else is new? Not only that, but Maduro had already decided to run to Cuba, but then the Russians stopped him. Really? So are we to believe that the coup was a stunning success? Yet another feather in the CIA's hat of a successful covert operations? Apparently so. After all, why would Maduro want to run unless he realized this situation was homeless? But then Russia called him and told him to stay put. The conversation must have gone something like this. Newton, Mr. Maduro, you don't need to worry about a thing. Just do what we tell you in state put. Maduro, but my people hate me. They all turned against me. The military is behind the coup. Put no, no, it's all under control. Just stay put. Maduro, but the mob will litch me if I stay put. No worries. Nobody will touch you. Does that dialogue look credible to you? I sure hope not. I think that anybody with a modicum of intelligence ought to realize that Maduro's decision to stay in place could only have been based on one of two possible considerations. First, the coup has failed and Maduro is safe. Or second, the coup has successful and Maduro was staying fight until his last breath like Salvador Allende in Chile. But tonight Maduro is safe in Caracas and the coupplotters are on the run. The truth is that only a loser and imbosol like Bombay could come up with such a lame excuse in a desperate attempt to cover his ass and blame his failure on the Neocon's favorite scapegoat, Barasha. Now let's check what his boss had to say. Trump does not blame Barasha instead. He blames Cuba. Tweet from Donald J. Trump. If Cuban troops in Malaysia do not immediately cease military and other operations for the purpose of causing death and destruction to the Constitution of Venezuela, notice he mentions the Constitution of Venezuela implying acknowledging it's a democracy with an elected president, a falling complete embargo together with highest level sanctions will be placed on the island of Cuba. Hopefully all Cuban soldiers will promptly and peacefully return to their island. I don't know what kind of silly scenarios Mr. Meg-Aran in his head to come up with the Cubans did it. But that is even more ridiculous than the Russians did it. Reading his tweets, how appropriate for this bird brain, one could get the impression that the Cubans launched a full scale military attack involving both the Cuban military and militias and that they orchestrated a brutal crackdown on the Venezuela and the people. In the real world however Cuba did nothing of the sort, but really who cares. In the empire of illusions, facts don't matter. At least to the leaders of the Anglo-Signedist empire continue to believe that only spin matters. In the case of Venezuela, spin alone fail. So what's next? According to the typical scenario revealed to us by John Berkins whose book I add, Confessions of an Economic Hitman is a must-read for any who want to understand international relations in the role of the U.S. therein. The next step should be a full-scale U.S. invasion. And yes, he is right. That would be what the empire would have done in its heyday. But nowadays, check out this interesting new snippet, Eric Prince wants Blackwater to send 5,000 mercenaries to Venezuela. Does anybody know why and how these clowns came up with a 5,000 figure? First, molten down prints. Do they really think that this is enough? The point is not whether Prince will ever get to send mercenaries to Venezuela or whether the Trump administration is inclined to accept this offer. The point is that Prince would have never made this offer in the first place. If the U.S. military was up to the task, it is not. In Prince knows that very well. As for Maduro, he seems to have the support not only of a majority of his people, but of the Venezuelan armed forces. As for the armed forces, they are clearly enjoying the support of the people. This is a very bad combination for the empire. Here is why. Yes, Venezuela has immense problems. And yes, most Chavez and Maduro have made mistakes. But this is not about Chavez or Maduro. This is about the rule of law inside and outside Venezuela. This is about the people of Venezuela, even the suffering ones, not willing to renounce the sovereignty of their country. Yes, Chavez did not solve all of Venezuela's problems. But to deliver the country to the empire would mean crushing any hope of true real people power. The Venezuelan people apparently have no illusions about their Yankee neighbors. And they don't want the empire style democracy to turn Venezuela into the next Libya. I should never say never. And God only knows what tomorrow this was actually written on May 1st. We'll bring. Wider was called for mass protests. But my gut feeling is that the empire injected itself into Venezuela just enough to trigger an immune reaction like a vaccine. But not enough to infect Venezuela with a toxin. Powerful enough to kill it. In the meantime, US aircraft carriers are in the Mediterranean trying to scare Russia, Syria, and Iran all at the same time. I can just imagine the disgusted contempt with which this latest saber rattling without dated hardware is received in Moscow, Damascus, or Teyran. Even Hezbollah remains utterly unimpressed. The truth is that the only people who have not come to the realization that the empire is broken and defeated are the rulers of the Nioh Condi state. And those who still watch the legacy, Zion media. I now everybody else has realized how utterly impolta the empire has become conclusion. The empire only appears to be strong in reality. It is weak, confused, clueless, and most importantly run by a sad gang of incompetent thugs who think they can scare everybody into submission in spite of not having won a single significant war since 1945. The inability to break the will of the people of Venezuela is only the latest symptom of this mind-boggling weakness. Meanwhile, we have a Venezuelan military chopper crashing outside of Croscus. With seven officers killed, this suggests to me it was a CIA hit using electro-magnetic poles to take out the computerized components just as they did with the Paul Wellstone aircraft. When it went down to miles south of the Evelift, Virginia Airport in Duluth when I was still on the faculty of the University of Minnesota there. So it begins Moscow to grant Russian citizenship to inhabitants of east Ukraine, rebel republics. This is pretty fascinating. Russian President Vladimir Putin signed in order when they simplifying the procedure to obtain a Russian passport for residents of separatist control eastern Ukraine, prompting calls from Kiev for more international sanctions. With the two Minsk-Akors, Russia offered a pressure back rebel Donas under Kiev rule, albeit with some autonomy. Part of Shinkol first signed up for that, but then just as quickly renounced a solution of that type. Kiev can't reclaim rebel Donbass without the help of Russia. There is and will never be a Ukrainian politician, self-assured enough to take the political risk of getting Donbass, autonomy to do it. And the Kremlin, for its own domestic policy reason, can't push the rebels under Kiev without it even if it wanted to. There's a lot going on here that is significant about Eastern Europe turning in favor of Russia. Meanwhile, North Korea warns of undesired consequences of the U.S. doesn't change its stand. Another sign of the weakness of the empire. Elaborating on previous calls from Kim Jong-un to show more flexibility, the Lies Foreign Minister Chloe Sun-Hooie said the U.S. was risking unintended consequences if they don't change their position on denuclearization to one more palatable to both sides. Chloe mentioned Mike Pompeo's threat to change paths if North Korea doesn't give the U.S. everything they want, saying that changing paths isn't an option that only the United States has, and that North Korea could also make that decision. She further said that the North Koreans remain determined to get rid of their nuclear arsenal, but U.S. comments and positions are forcing them to hesitate. After the Hanoi summit, the U.S. indicated that denuclearization meant to them that North Korea would give the U.S. its nuclear arms. Notice how one sided North Korea is keen for a deal with dismantling the arms and the infrastructure is enough and in return the U.S. laws for a peace treaty with South Korea and start letting the U.S. sanctions be lifted. You know, officials are ruling out either until North Korea gives them everything they want, which officials say could take several years. I say never. Meanwhile, North Korea and South Korea are actually improving their relations and I expect them to work things out independently before the U.S. ever brings itself to adopt a reasonable rational stance. Meanwhile, surprise is fry. Israel grants first-golden heights oil drilling license to jick chainy link company. BBC, Israel is granted a U.S. company, the first license to export oil and gas from the occupied Golem heights. Now, remember Donald Trump has been playing the Israeli game. He declared that Jerusalem was a capital of Israel, which was an outrage. He declared the Golem heights belong to Israel, which was again in violation of international law. He demonized the Iranian revolutionary guards by describing them as a terrorist organization when there are nothing of the sort. And now, Israel is reciprocating by giving the first oil drilling license for land belongs to Syria, who gene the energy listened to this. On Israel's illegal theft of Syrian natural resources via oil American company, the F.T. Financial Times says Israel has handed out the first oil drilling license in the Golem heights and guess who won it? A company linked a former U.S. vice president, Dick Cheney. Genie energy, guess who's on the board of directors? Since the outbreak of the conflict in Syria, Israel has awarded drilling rights for oil and gas in Israeli occupied Syria to a company called Genie Energy, who's on the board? Dick Cheney, Jacob Rothschild, Rupert Murdoch, James Woolsey, Bill Richardson, Larry Summers, Michael Steinhardt, bad people. I used to think Bill Richardson was an okay guy, but I have to reassess. Meanwhile, we're reminded as medley Butler's pamphlet war is a racket for the distinguished Marine Court general, the recipient of two congressional medals of honor, declared in retrospect in the twilight of his career how he had spent his professional life as he military forces to benefit the bottom line for bankers and corporations that have no loyalty even to the United States. Here's a sobering report from Mike Adams, I was previously celebrating another reason why. Every liberal city in America has headed toward Venezuela. Liberal cities across America are collapsing into third world status. It's not just the fact that San Francisco streets are now littered with drug needles and human feces either. Seattle is also collapsing into rampant homelessness and drug addiction, creating an entire class of impoverished homeless residents or breeding grounds for HIV and other infectious diseases. Yes, Seattle's liberal city leaders like all progressives are unwilling to take any actions to resolve the problems in the first place. Instead, they enact new policies and make the problems worse while calling it for our grass. Local reporter Eric Johnson recently released a documentary called Seattle is dying, which dared to document the city's collapse into third world status. But instead of working to resolve the root of the problem, that is the brain dead, liberally economic policies that lead to destitution and collapse, the cities elite have launched a PR campaign to brainwash local citizens with engineers happy messages that are doodifully broadcast by local news networks. Seattle City Journal, for example, reports. Earlier this month, leaked documents revealed that a group of prominent non-profits, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Campion Advocacy Fund, Rakees Foundation, and the Baltimore Group hired a PR firm, Pyramid Communications, to conduct polling, create messaging and disseminate the resulting content to a network of silent partners in academia, the press government and the nonprofit sector. The campaign hashtag Seattle for all is a case study in what writer James Lindsey calls idea laundering, creating misinformation and legitimizing it as objective truth through repetition and sympathetic media. That's what it's all about. That's what our own mainstream has been for decades now. This propaganda campaign, of course, is exactly what the vaccine industry does on a daily basis all across America. Monsanto and the GMO industry has been pursuing the same dishonest tactics for years. First, they fabricate industry lies and pay up doctors and health experts to sign their names to industry-funded junk science. Then they use your propaganda directives to the corporate run media, which doodifully broadcast all their propaganda. From there, the tech giant shadow band and de-platform anyone who opposes the official narrative. So now, Seattle's wealthy elite are trying to brainwash the population into rejecting the evidence right in front of their own eyes. It's the Richard prior joke, who are you going to believe me or your lying eyes? Seattle is rapidly turning into a whole country, liberal city, because liberals destroy everything they control. See, the Seattle has died many documentary, I watched it very disturbing. As Charles Hughes Smith writes in his article, America's forced financial flight, clean, unaffordable, and dysfunctional cities. Although it's verboten to mention this, and the we're so fabulous local media, many of these high-cost urban regions are hopelessly dysfunctional. Taxpayers imponing billions of dollars in New Texas fees and bond measures, and yet none of the problems that make daily life miserable ever get better. The forced flight from unaffordable and dysfunctional urban regions is as yet a trickle, but watch what happens when a recession causes widespread layoffs in high-weight sectors, and suddenly the hipster beastro that was always jammed as empty and then shuttered. To replace the taxes lost to layoffs and close businesses of illegal class will have no choice, but to launch a frenzy of higher taxes, fees and church arduous on those left behind, which will only accelerate the sequence. Every liberal city headed toward Venezuela's style class. This story is about much more than just Seattle, whatever American needs to understand is that liberals are right now in the process of economically godting every major US city that's under their control. Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York City, Houston, Miami, Denver, Portland, and other liberal cities are all headed toward totally economic and humanitarian disaster. Leftist policies breed homelessness, drug addiction, disease and starvation. In cities like Seattle, the government even pays for needles in drugs to continue supporting the substance abuse habits of local citizens. If liberals regain the White House in the future, they'll do the same to America they're doing to Seattle. Instead of solving problems, liberals would rather portray those who suffer from those problems as victims of oppression. Yes, the liberal Democrat policies that are creating these nightmare conditions to begin with, driving people out of jobs with mandatory minimum wage hikes, for example, that also caused business owners to flee the cities and states run by liberals. Remember, left-wing societies are characterized by a