Jo Cox MP Death, EU Remain Blairite Coup

Video Transcript:

Welcome back to Windows on the World, and now with Dr Nick Collister, and we're going to talk about the Jo Cox murder and the details of that which haven't been really reported in any clarity in the press and also the way it's been used politically. So Nick, welcome to Windows on the World. Well it's a pleasure to be back here again Mark, and we're looking at a sign up which had a massive effect on the Brexit vote. But for anyone who's out there who doesn't know what a sigh of peace can explain that. It means that it was designed to have an effect on the psyche of the British people. So you think the event wasn't just random? Totally, yeah. It was designed. It appeared on 6666 June 2016, and the whole thing, the way that I've folded, we got an apparent death, massive media coverage. The next day we had a funeral, we had a call bin and a camera and up, and we had the very next day with flowers. When you get a funeral event the day after that, we had a Marlambon magistrates court, we had this suspect, Thomas Mayer, in Marlambon magistrates court making... Which West Minster, wasn't it? Marlambon. OK. And why wasn't he tried in Leeds? Why was it suddenly arranged? Marlamb should take months to book an appearance there. I can't imagine that suddenly the very next day, day after that we had Parliament recalls to discuss this Jo Cox murder. Then we had the 22nd, it was at birthday, so all around planet Earth, there were birthday celebrations, you know, Washington, South America. That was something that is very strange for someone who's just an MP, because the Americans didn't know who she was, really. I mean CNN actually stated that she was a British lawmaker. Yeah, you know, not necessarily. I haven't really heard about that. And then amazingly, it would, amazingly, the Brexit vote still held, thank God. But on the 16th, I was reading a six-point majority of Brexit, and that was successfully shattered. If you consider the way a site was conducted, Mark, amazingly, the ex-husband didn't show any sign, whatever a grief, and he started talking about remain, the remain campaign and we must work against hate, which is a very political kind of. He actually said we need to fight against the hate that killed her, which was a peculiar and quite a manipulative statement. It's a manipulative statement. And two ticks, all the media coverage was about hate, equals little angry Englanders who are in favour of Britain first, and there were fascists, there were Nazis, and then they framed him as being a Nazi, this Thomas Mayer. He was supposed to have Nazi background suddenly, he was painted with a Nazi background. Yes, I think it was Jada Franson from Britain first, who actually said that this guy had nothing to do with them. But there was one website which actually claims that there is a Britain first group, and he is amongst those people, have you seen that? No, no, I'm website, yeah, dodgy-locking picture, but that group itself denied him and did with him. So he was framed in Nazi, so the whole site was done that let's split it together, let's stay together, let's show love. Love means big in with the EU, let's not give way to hate, and hate means petty little Englander politics of these white racist Nazi isolations. We've given that terrific polarity, we were drenched in loads of phony emotion about the grief of the death of this woman, and it didn't work, half. Not really, I don't think it did, but just a few quotes from Brendan Cox, he said it was an act of terror designed to advance hate towards others. He said, what a beautiful irony it is that an act designed to advance hatred has in fact instead generated an outpouring of love. I mean, these statements are just well constructed soundbites, the mean propaganda. He never showed any sign of grief, in fact, you can see any sign of grief in the family, they're reading out a script or whatever. And I've never seen a death which are less feeling that anyone had died. Can we perhaps just go over some of the details? Let's go into some of the detail, Nick, yes. Well, the neighbours were talking about this fella, pleasant social chap ears, he's not a loner, he'd always talked about, give you gardening advice, do voluntary work in love with gardens. The bit of psychological help he had was just for depression, that's all, just treat for depression, which we all get. And it did voluntary work, and it gave people help for advice in their gardens. It's no particular interest in politics, no one can remember him expressing an opinion about Brexit, however, everyone in UM without exception could not square this deed at all with what they knew about him. And a neighbour who last saw him, personally last time saw him, said, oh, I thought he was going to try to help this MPGO Cox in some way. So my hunch would be that he was captured somehow on the way and maybe drugs up. I don't accept that he had a one-foot-long knife and that he stabbed her seven times with it. I don't accept that he had a handmade gun. This is all the story we were given. I don't think there was any blood anywhere, that's the first thing that struck me. She was getting out of her car and then the South Yorkshire police said, come out statement that she got out of her car with two other people, three of them got out of the car and now we're walking towards this library. I'm showing a picture of the library which had full windows all the way long. So if our constituents were working in the library, they would have seen what happened and do we hear anything from them. And there's the pavement. This came out in the down year mirror on the 16th. This is the mirror online, 16th, the very day. They showed a picture of the library, not a drop of blood on the pavement, absolutely nothing. Yes, now the other thing also which is very important is the tattoos and the photograph that seems to have been used of the police capturing him, he doesn't seem to have had the tattoos. But what struck me? Have you noticed that we only shown one picture of him? Always just the one picture of the white hat face he asked looking very, very puzzled with very large gloves. Yes, very large gloves. That's the only picture. Well, what's interesting about this is the way that the police also reported it because they were actually saying that they were given their information basically through the media. And this is something that seems to be happening all the time now. The media seems to generate the story and the police then pick it up. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, well the story that the police came out with was that they had arrested the suspect one mile away, of course in one mile from the events if you remember, and they recognized him by a black baseball cap with blood on it. And they claimed to find a bit of blood in his pocket or whatever. But I mean if he had stabbed Joe Cox with a knife seven times, wrestling out of the floor, that's what we're told. He had blood all over his shirt everywhere. There's no way he could walk through a city for a mile in the middle of the day at noon in a condition like that. And furthermore, without leaving any trial of blood anywhere, and the police did not report any blood on him. Well, the woman who was with her, who was some kind of advisor, it's reported in one of the newspaper stories, was that there was a lot of blood and she was using it. There was a report, yes. What other witnesses said there was blood everywhere. But if you know that she said it on the pavement. See, if I may, there were several different locations where this event was alleged to have happened, which is a part of an argument that didn't happen. After the initial reports, which for Arkansas said that it happened on the pavement in front of the library, then police photographs came out showing stuff remaining in the middle of a road. And the various bits of tape all around as if something had happened in the middle of a road. And we shan some shoes in the middle of the road, as some remain. Then there's a first story that she had tried to run away and it ends up in a car park. And then there was some sort of triage or police cars in a car park. So there were different stories of where it happened. And I think, yes, there was one story came out at one point that they had a rest of him or held him near the library. But I think it's fair to say that the main story was that they caught him one mile away. Yes. And it brings us back again to why aren't the police in there on the ground interviewing witnesses straight away? So they don't appear to be doing? No, they would say excuse me. There's probably a cafe next to that library. People are supposed to come out and see the scar with a white baseball cap, white resting the gelcobs at the ground. So that doesn't fit too well with the police seeing the scar with the black baseball cap. And I suggest that all the kind of details were given, for example. Can you answer how many people were there? You can't really. You just got different stories. Could you tell us a bit about the older guy who's meant to win Intervene, those 77-year-old? Yeah, OK. Bernard Kenny. Yes. Who had a birthday same guy as Joe Cox, 22nd June, allegedly? He came out to that cafe, allegedly. And got stabbed in his lamp and was taken off to the hospital. And I mean, I can't say anything more than that. That's just an... There's not too much been reported about that other than there's a fundraiser petition to get him some kind of medal for this intervention. Well, also perhaps point out, a report was that she was airlifted to the hospital in Leeds, generally, in Birmingham, not the local hospital. And so that's if it can't part the story. And that's kind of impossible. Where could a helicopter have come down, put her on a stretcher, lifted her up? There were no photographs at all of any of this. And it goes without saying, Mark, that we haven't got any CCTVs. We expect that. But I would expect, if the police wanted anyone to believe their story, they would release at least one or two of CCTV pictures showing Mayor in the area. Was he anywhere in the area? Was Joe Cox, had Joe Cox got out of the car? Can we just see a CCTV indicating that? And as with various other alleged terror events, you might expect in the middle of the day for somebody to take in a picture, but this doesn't happen. This is a key point. So there's no CCTV and there's no camera phone footage. Now this happens quite a lot when these events happen now. I don't know whether she was killed or not. Well, the person who identified the body was allegedly the sister. And I'm sure you've seen the video of the next day at this funeral's half event. And the sister can't keep her straight face. She's really out of stuff. She's thrilled and she's happy. And the mother is also quite amused by it all. No tries to grieve anywhere. A lot of web comments, people just don't believe that sister has identified the dead body of Joe Cox. They certainly didn't look like people who were grieving. It was something very odd about all that, but that brings us to the background of her and her husband or ex-husband. What sort of people they were, they seem to be pretty much playwright in their views or globalists. He was at the World Economic Forum. He's a development consultant for them. And he spouts diversity, globalization is basically a change agent. He believes in entrepreneurship in the global public interest and promotes social entrepreneurs. And there's something very, very contrived about the stuff he did to camera and the quotes that came out. And it was used in this very childish political way. Two hours after the event, what did he do? He posted a picture of his wife smiling happy, resting on the barge, which is their home by the river. Now, do you really do that after death of your wife? Post a smiling happy picture of her two hours later? Or is that a kind of signal to everyone in the node? Look, don't worry, she's all right. You know? Well, there's a lot of anomalies there and you've gone into most of them. The thing is, this was used as a political, basically, for the Remain Camp. And it was basically saying that people who voted Brexit were some kind of terrorist extremists. And that's really what was being promoted out of her death. Or as you believe, maybe some kind of psychological operation on the public. Yeah, well, just consider the contact you've described. Yeah. She worked for some little games to our company. A pillar millinda gates foundation. Yeah, they're both high up with influential people. Let me suggest that when you do get up in that kind of realm, you can be, the empire can tap you on the fact on the children. So I look and Fred's a five minute one to ask of you. It's for the greater cause. Billions and billions are involved, keeping Britain in the EU. And I'm afraid I'm not going to have to ask you to do this for us. And she just vanishes. And we don't see any pictures of a dead body. We don't see any, I haven't seen any grief at all. I'm not blooded on the street anywhere. I mean, observe the actual story of this guy, Mayor, with a huge knife, with a 12 foot long blade, a couple of blood. 12 inch long blade. Yeah, 12 inch long blade. And nobody sees it. Or just very dodgy witnesses. I mean, there's nothing like, I suggest this is not a real event. You know, and the way the media come out and absolute chorus about it. And the diversity of the stories, the different stories, such as washi airlifted, you know, or... Well, we're not given anything to really get our teeth into. There's no real information being conveyed by the police. And basically the police are saying there to the papers that the case is going to be heard under the terrorism protocols. Now, what are the terrorism protocols? I've had a sad thing for sure. Yeah. It means that Mayor is silent. You want to talk. You want to hear Mayor speak. You want to confront a microphone and be asked, for example, did you order far right literature from America? Yes or no. You know, we like him just to say it, so that. Quite apart from, did you want to talk to him? This was years ago, wasn't it? This was about eight or ten years ago. Yeah, I mean, that's another one. And that was brought in by the... Was it the Southern Poverty Law Center? Yes, it was a close-in proof that the whole thing is framed. That went on a website on the 16th, the very day of the events. The Southern Poverty Law Center, that's how the word, when this guy is just a suspect, it claimed to have receipts of 17 years ago. Suddenly receipts, suddenly go up on their way. His strange alley popped up, isn't it? We're going to take a short break and we'll see in a couple of minutes. Our next guest, Nazarine, was evicted from her own property. This was due to a management company issue and charges which she disputed. The lady called for assistance from the police, and she's now been arrested. Han Cuffed. Took out of her own home. The student lines of the debt book has been sold. All of what we've talked about is coming your way. Sergeant? Sergeant? No, no, she's just going to the police station at this time. What has she been arrested for? British police. Well, that video was very shocking because Nazarine was actually peacefully occupying her own property and she was arrested for breach of the peace in her own house. It's very painful towards because in that instance, I realised something terrible is happening in this country. We did a show about people getting their doors kicked in. By the police, on behalf of private interests without proper court warrants, and this is actual fact, this is happening. It's illegal and it's corrupt. And you have to ask yourself, why are the people who are willing to bust in people's doors? What the hell happened to them? You have to take that! You actually called me after you were smashing the door. Yeah. We actually got a phone call into their press office. And first of all, they said the police would never do that. However, they've been caught on video doing just that. The second time we called, they said, if the police did that, it would be criminal damage. So you've just witnessed criminal damage by the police. Welcome back to Windows on the World. We're talking about the murder of Joe Cox and with Dr Nick Collestrom. And we've had a quite interesting introduction there to what this is all about and what's been said, what hasn't been said, how it's been reported by the police. And the anomalies in the story. We're now going to go back to what this guy actually said, Thomas Mayer. He was allegedly yelling out Britain first when he had cost you Joe Cox. Yes. Oh no, whoops, he didn't say it after all. And the chap with a local cafe put up a notice in his window saying, at no point did anyone shout out Britain first. That's right, yes, he did. So that was partly not- There was another two witnesses though, Nick. Can you tell us a bit about them? Well, two people came out of the cafe, didn't they? And one of them alleged they struggled to rescue the Joe Cox. And the other, I think, just kept a distance. We mentioned the one Kenny who got a knife. Yes, but it was this guy, Mr Rothwell, I think, who maintained that he had said, you had heard someone say the mayor say Britain first. The illegitimate was mayor that said Britain first, Thomas Mayer. Right. And the other two who allegedly got out the car with Joe Cox, they don't seem to have said much to it, do they? And they're much from them. No, no, there isn't much. And I've been to quite a lot of the papers, yeah. That mad sounding cry was an echoed in the court case, wasn't it? A man had been caught when he said death to traitors and- Freedom for Britain. Freedom for Britain. At Westminster magistrates court on the Saturday. Westminster. Yes. On the Saturday. Yes. And on 23rd, at the Old Bailey on Monday, confirmed his name as Thomas Mayer, but that was via video link from Belmarsch Prison. Yeah, I noticed the first one, he didn't confirm his name, did he? No, he just- and that might have been some actual double in the court, crying out to death to traitors. He wasn't keen on purging himself on out of about his name being Thomas Mayer. I'd just suggest that as a possibility. Well, it's a very interesting one. Because we're remotely resembling the character that everybody knew as Thomas Mayer. Yeah, quite a gentle one, gentle without interest in politics. I mean, the thing that's most striking about that is the way it's been propagandised, so who benefited from that? Who actually benefited from it? And really, what's interesting as well is that Thomas Mayer was meant to be some far-right, you know, you're some kind of Nazi extremist, you know. But if you look at the background of these two, Joe and Brendan Cox, it would be more likely that they would have a Muslim extremist doing it, because of their views and what they've done with her. She's voted for bombing Syria. Yeah, but how did they want it to create the image of the right-wing reactionary far-right Nazi movement? I'm throwing this in to... Why? ...who wanted to... ...stack the ones who Brexit. So it makes... That was the purpose of NBRI. Yes, but I'm trying to make sense of it in the broader picture. You're right, generally, that the image, obviously, were all used to the Muslim terrorists, who years at a Akbar, and people who come to accept that as feasible. No, I meant that would actually make more sense with the views of these two. To see what I'm trying to say here is that... In a rational sense, if you look at the background and what they are and what they've said and who they've been involved with, it would make more sense if they were going to set up a patsy for it to be a Muslim, in my opinion. But, of course, they're trying to blacken people like Farage who just want to get out of Europe. As there, and anybody who votes against remain is an extremist as reported by people like Angela Merkel. And, of course, all the Blairites. Well, whenever they're creating a patsy, you get a fake identity put onto them, of hatred and extremism and so on. And the real person gets lost. Real person is forgotten. And I always feel that is what we need to try and rescue. We need to get a real bug with Thomas Mayer. I've heard he really was, because I doubt we'll ever hear him speak again. Okay, he's probably drugged up to the eyeballs now. With stuff. And I think there is, at the end of this year, there was due to be some court hearing. And they will carefully monitor what he said. Notice that the judge, what was the name? Lodi Bathnot. What was the same, we heard at the Marlemagetre school on the 18th. That's the same who presided over the Lee Rigby. A very, very good point there. And also, it's the same who let off that bent House of Lords, Jana and Jewish Peter, Peter, horrible Peter, and she let him off. So that could be the reason why this fellow Mayer was brought down to London to be tried by this judge. Yes, for anyone who thinks that's a bit far-fetched, I'd like to bring attention to something here, Nick. That's very important. Because in the lower courts, or the high courts, what we're talking about, things that are civil, which become criminal, there are a cabal of judges who we actually know about on this show who are working against the interests of the public and as a cabal. And basically, stealing property. So if this could actually go higher up the Jew's issue, then what you're saying is not really out of the realms of logic, you know? My hunch would be that when he had that extraordinary outburst on the 18th at the Marlemagetre school, that no members of the public were there. That would be my hunch that it was partly because it was called so suddenly, we weren't expecting it. That it was either a closed court or a court without any members of the public. And obviously, we one did really say that. Did anybody really shout that out in a court? I didn't see anywhere that it said, in a packed public gallery or anything like that. Let's just make the general voice. Terrible important, the justice is a public event must be seen. And as and when this fellow Mayer does come to trial, let's try to be there in these some of the time. Normally, these people that are just just sips through the trial silent and there's nothing much they're out of sight. They've just given the verdict and told how bad they are. But nonetheless, we do need to try to be there at such a trial. Yes, this reminds me a little bit of the Jildando Barry George scenario, where he was kind of this projected onto him that it was kind of this obsessive, simple turn. And of course, he was completely innocent. And the police in that case, when it started, knew that. I have some information that was given to me at the time that the police actually were not really interested in Barry George. Right, right. So they couldn't find anybody. And of course, we find that now he was innocent. Right, yeah, yeah. Okay, well, in practical terms, what? Let's say, if anyone up in Leeds, Leeds sort of truth group, obviously that's where the old London Bombing story was kind of hatched or none of the narrative took place up there. Let's urge them to try and ask practical, realistic questions. For example, asking the police if they can release an image with a trace of blood anywhere or if they can define where exactly they think the struggle took place. Can they have been pointed? Or possibly ask Leeds in firmerie to show the receipt, which they filled in when the body was brought to them at about two o'clock in the afternoon on the 16th from a helicopter, if it was from a helicopter. Can they show us the receipt? These kind of practical details, which presumably cannot be produced because our samaritan, none of it happened. The refusal is important. If you ask these questions politely in a written letter or witnesses and you get a refusal, that's as much as you can do. So we try to get practical, realistic details, I suggest. For example, who was the last person who ever saw Thomas Smith? We might not, well, sure whether we'll ever see him again. And we're slightly worried that at a trial it might be some sort of double who stands in front of him. These kind of practical details at this point that we want to try and the public need full disclosure of what's happening in these cases because they're not getting any disclosure. And the police are being fed, as we said, at the start of the show, by the media. They've fed a story by the media, which they then report. Now it's their job to investigate these things and to present the evidence to the public. Well, it's terribly difficult. Once the whole government has told the police who's guilty, this is the trouble with the war on Terry, you see. The whole traditional investigative way in which the police works is been kind of hijacked by the war on Terry and the anti-Terra command. Counter-Terra command, that's the story. That's the story. The police are told who's guilty and they're told they're fighting a war on Terry, and it's terribly different to pursue the normal course of action. I mean, for example, the day after the event on the 17th, they said they had arrested the suspect. They got the suspect. Now, if they found him there outside the library with blood all over him and a huge knife, they wouldn't be calling him a suspect with that. Well, that has to be decided by the jury. Well, allegedly. Now, the thing is, as well, Nick, was we're going to wrap this up for this section, is that the only thing we know about Thomas Mayer was from a local newspaper. In 2010, he was a volunteer at Oakwell Hall as a gardener, and it was through the Murfield Pathways Day Center for adults with mental health problems, and he stated at the time, it's done me more good than all the psychotherapy and medication in the world. And that was in 2010. Well, we'll never know that. Thanks to Windows on the World. Keep watching those, watching us, watching Windows on the World, and we'll see you soon.