Karen Kingston Ex Pfizer CONFIRMS Graphene Oxide In Covid Vaccine Patents

Video Transcript:

And other is graphene oxide in these shots. 100% it is and it's irrefutable and I'll walk you through it. So what's really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what's called a pegalated lipid nanoparticle. And that's what we're going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna pattern, it says right there that this contains a lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the pattern, which I'll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various pegalated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA, with the IND phase three trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them across the palm with the UK filings. I hope that's making sense so far. Yes, so far. So here's the important thing about the pattern. I read the pattern. It's 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the pattern to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the pattern because it is a trade secret. So you remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret. Yes. Trade secrets are not, you know, purviewed to the public. So they cannot be in the pattern. So graphene oxide is not listed in the pattern. And it lists everything but that. But I'm still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the pattern in China that shows they contain graphene oxide. So let me just ask you. Why would they put every other ingredient on the pattern with the exception of the standalone graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there? I would say the number one reason is because it's poisonous to humans and well known that it's poisonous to humans. OK. What we have done back and forth with fact checkers, some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called L'Aquita Columna, originally broken here on the stupider show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance, a poison was found in the visor vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here. USA Today leads stories all funded by the cabal were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over, well, I think about a million views on rumble. We have sought the input of many medical experts, world renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Micavitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue. On Twitter, you may have been recently following the hashtag Pfizer leak. We want to know what's in them. We want to know if it was pre-planned. Who's behind all of it? We want to know what to believe. So today we're going to get the confirmation that we need. It's hard to fact check documents. It's hard to fact check publicly discoverable proprietary ingredients. It's hard to fact check Karen Kingston. She is a former Pfizer employee currently an analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. Karen, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate your bravery. We admire your desire to expose the truth behind what appears to be, to me at least, one of the most, if not the most evil agenda mankind has ever been subject to. Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you're right. It is extremely difficult to find this information and and link it together. I do have a unique set of skills. This is what I do in the industry. I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape for both physicians, pharma and consumers. And then I'm also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can't expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information. The truth is I'm, you know, the whole de your own research was born out of the out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that's why people have had to do their own research. And that's that that violates our first amendment. So. So let's just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots? 100% it is and it's irrefutable and I'll walk you through it. So what's really important to know is that the all of the mRNA vaccines contain what's called a pegolated lipid nanoparticle. And that's what we're going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna pattern, it says right there that this contains a lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the pattern, which I'll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various pegolated formulations that have alpha numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND phase three trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the palm with the UK filings. I hope that's making sense so far. So here's the important thing about the patent. I read the patent. It's 193 pages plus attachments. I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So you remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret. Trade secrets are not, you know, purview to the public. So they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent and it lists everything but that. But I'm still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide. So let me just ask you why would they put every other ingredient on the patent with the exception of the standalone graphene oxide. Why would they not put that on there? Then I would say the number one reason is because it's poisonous to humans and well known that it's poisonous to humans. Okay. The other reason is because it is the main ingredient in hydrogen, which is the liquid, you know, AI template that's used for some of Elon Musk's, you know, research and Bill Gates as far as that creating an interface between humans and, you know, the internet. There is a legitimate theory that these shots are actually designed to create some sort of connectivity between humans, 5G, whatever this is controlling your thoughts, your memories, all of these things. I mean, those are realistic and plausible. That's not possible with this round. They rush this thing out. They're just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly. So this is a dose finding study basically alive, dose finding study and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillain, Brady's tremors, the magnetism, all these things. Well, remember we're supposed to get boosters every six months. So we're going to get graphene oxide boosters every six months to see how much we can build up in the system. We'll go through this because when you see the nations that are being injected, we're the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there's a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff because I don't like to give opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize. So I'd rather stick to the data if that's okay. Yeah. So if you take a look at chemical and engineering news, there is these non peer review journals, we call them rags in the industry, every industry has it. And it's basically, you know, the whales of the industry, the who's who and they just kind of brag about what they're doing. So this article talks about the paginated lipid nanoparticles that are in all the COVID-19 vaccines and there's four lipids and I'll go over this. This lipid is cholesterol and that's our body less, less crystal makes it go through the blood. Then there's a phospholipid. The phospholipid adheres to the cell membrane so that allows permeability to enter the cell membrane. There's an ionizable lipid so that gives it a positive ionic charge to help penetrate the mRNA to get into the cell. And then there's the paginated lipid. And so the reason why they created these is because mRNA is very unstable, whether it's synthetic or zoonic, which means it's from an animal, you know, or human. It's very unstable. 80 degree weather kills it, sunlight kills it. If you breathe on it, it dies. I mean, and the researchers all say this. It's just, it rarely gets past the Nizoferings area of any healthy individual. It's just, you know, your saliva kills it. It just, it cannot survive on its own. So it needed this kind of biosphere that they created for it. And that's why we have these four, these four lipids and then they put the graphene oxide. Now what's interesting about the graphene oxide is that it's 4,000 times stronger than titanium and can withstand 1700 degree Fahrenheit temperature. So we took this very unstable virus, single-healux virus. And we made it indestructible or we, they made it indestructible. So the paginated lipids, if you take a look, it's PEG, PEG. They're made by a company called SinoPEG, which is SNO, you know, PEG, and they're located in China. Now, how did I find this out? Well, if you take a look at the Pfizer EUA filing, they list the four lipids. They have two lipids, each of which have four lipids in them in there. And so does Moderna. And Moderna is called, it's called a material safety data sheet. This is what they use in industrial products. And it has a cast number. And there's this SM 102 from Moderna. And then if you go to Pfizer's filing with the UK, the number, the two lipids that are in there are called ALC0315 and ALC0159. So when I Googled MSDS cast, don't ask how I know all this information. And I put in some of those numbers, I found SinoPEG. I didn't find SinoPEG by Googling SinoPEG. I literally put in the MSDS number. And so if you go to the website, you'll see the, you know, extremely long, like, I don't know, 100 alpha numeric name of each of these lipids. And you'll see it under a tab called COVID-19 Exhibience. And it says polyethylene glycol peg 2000, right? And then here you'll see it's ALC01159. And this company is located in China. And then if you pull from the patent, from the Moderna patent, they list out all the different polyethylene glycol 200 peg 200 peg 2000. And you will find those listed under the COVID-19 Exhibience in SinoPEG. So it's right there. It's being manufactured in China. And so there's other vaccines that are mRNA vaccines that are not being sold in the United States. You can find those Exhibience here too by the cast number, the material safety data sheet cast number. And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SinoPEG is it is the core shell structured polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy storage, polymorphine, and polyethylene glycol. Polymer, polymorph, dioelectrics combine mechanical and dialectic performances. So what that means is that graphene is a conductor, it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this isn't all the some of the studies from the NIH Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything it comes in contact with. Right now they're not charged, they're neutralized. You're like, how does it have a positive charge to get into the cell? That's that other lipid, that ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration, but these currently are not, they're neutral. They have a neutral field. But if there is an electromagnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially, there will be damage and potentially death depending on where these nanocarticles ended up to people's bodies and how much of them get. So it's apparent to me that they're lying to the world. They're trying to hide this. This is the secret ingredient. Lead story's USA Today All These Other Publications Fact Checking This Program. It appears to me that they are out and out lying. We're going to get to who's in on all of this in a minute because I'm going to ask you, but why are they using this graphene oxide? It's a toxic substance. It's poisonous. Why are they using it? Because it's a great conductor of electricity and it can host a magnetic field. So it can literally, it can connect you to the internet, that's why. All right. I just wanted to make sure that I was clear on that because I know that you're not comfortable or pining opinions, things like that. I just want to make sure factually that that's what it can do. That's what it's capable of doing. Yeah. I haven't had the chance, but I could probably go into some tech publications and AI publications and we can find more information on how graphene oxide is a great problem. Well, the bottom line is it's poisonous. It's poisonous. It's an eye elates if it has a positive charge. It annihilates anything that it comes into contact with. It's toxic for humans. It should not be in there and it is. That is what I needed to know. Who's behind this? That's what I'd like to know. Who's behind all of this? Well, I don't know. So, Liff, hold on. I didn't put this in here, but there's a company called Shanghai Nanotech and they filed a patent and you can, for a graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 acceptance. And this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name's Tails Axe, the Chief Technology Officer for Moodyerna. Then if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It's from sometime last year and you'll see the usual suspects there. You'll see like Peter Dasnack and the names from Moodyerna and several names from the NIH and NID. So, there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires many, many times over that and I have coordinated for the development and execution of these products. So you knowing this, you bringing this, this confirmation, why would the, I guess I mean, this is opinion. So you just tell me if you're not comfortable answering this, but I got to ask, why would people like President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Sean Hannity, what do they have in, what's taken the game to they have? How do they not know this stuff? They have, I mean, if they're not. No, there's no way they could know this stuff. I want to be, when I found out, when I read this information, I didn't know a woman could cry as hard as I cried. So I sent an email out on May 26 to about 30 outlets. I took this information, I sent an email summarizing it, these are bio weapons. I even spoke to, and I don't mean to be disparaging to anybody, I even spoke to American front line doctors and stuff and after I spoke to them, some of the doctors still went on saying, well, as long as you're, if you're over under 30, you shouldn't get the vaccines and I called them up and like, what the hell are you doing? These are bio weapons. Like, we can't say that. So the cognitive dissonance of the depravity and the evil of these, of these vaccinations is very difficult for anyone to understand and you have to also understand that for the whole year and a half, these are being developed. Anyone that came out and said, hey, this virus isn't that bad, they were mocked, they were ridiculed, they were ostracized, doctors were threatened to have the license taken away. So the truth couldn't get out there. And then when people, anyone that was questioning about the speed of bringing these vaccines to market, the need for them, even the FDA documents, they talk about, hey, we don't think someone under 18 should get these things. We're worried about viral shedding. The, here, as you show this like here, the manufacturing section of the application is redacted. Right? No one in good conscience should have approved this, but there was such brainwashing going on, such control of what, basically, the big tech wanted us to know as the truth, which was a bunch of lies that it's very difficult then for someone that says to you, this is what's going on to believe it. I would compare it to anyone that's been in a marriage where they had a spouse that was cheating on them. Your friends can tell you they're cheating, there's tons of evidence, but you are not going to believe it. You're not going to believe all your trusted, all your trusted advisors are telling you this stuff is safe, everything on the media says it's safe, everyone, you know, and then someone says, no, it's actually lethal and this is a planned, you know, planned genocide. It's impossible to believe. Wow. Does that make sense? Yeah, and, you know, I'm just, I'm having a hard time. I mean, honestly, I mean, I'm a human, you know, and so just knowing people that have subjected themselves to this inoculation, knowing how hard, how difficult it is to have a conversation with somebody, doing what I do, downloading to my brain, terabytes of information every single day, trying to determine what's real, what's not, what's missing, what's disinformation, who's deep state, who's trying to throw me off, who's controlled opposition. You know, I mean, it really, it happens. It sounds like some kind of a sci-fi movie, but you're living in it, so you understand, I'm just trying to process all this as you're saying it. And I'm imagining, you know, people in the media, you know, I'm imagining, you know, people that they don't understand that there are billions of lives at stake, or maybe they do, which makes it even worse because they're complicit in this, they're part of this, the carrying on of this. And then I think about everybody who's going to be mandated, these shots. Listen, I've, Karen, I got an email this morning, I got an email this morning from a very concerned mother of a young woman who is going to be attending a Christian college in South Carolina. And they're going to mandate this thing for her. 18-year-old young woman with her entire life ahead of her, and she's just one of millions of stories like this that are happening here in this country, what we're doing to our young people poisoning them. And so then you've got healthcare workers. I mean, I have a dozen emails in the last 48 hours from nurses, healthcare workers, doctors, people who are working at these facilities in these clinics at these hospitals that are going to be mandated this, they don't want to do it. They need help. And you know, the DOJ is telling everybody that they can do this, that governors can mandate this, that businesses can mandate this. And so, it was a DOJ, just because someone says something, especially in this current administration, doesn't make it true. Okay, the DOJ can say, we recommend this is mandated. We're saying that this is, we mandate these vaccines, but I, you know, it's a memo. I read the memo. Okay, it's a memo that was written by Don Johnson. She's the acting assistant attorney general to the president saying that, you know, under Title Code 21, Section 564, you, you know, you can man, you know, private companies and local governments can mandate the vaccines in a university use authorization. Her interpretation is reckless and it has no merit. So it's just an opinion. It is not enforceable period. You know, and on top of that, what's, what's happened with these vaccines or these injections, these EU injections, not only is all the campaign and the propaganda a bunch of lies to terrify people into getting injected, you know, which is a violation of human rights in and of itself. On top of that, you know, she hasn't mentioned Title Code 21 in her memo, which is what this falls under, because they violated four other sections of that Title Code under, under drug safety. They have under Section 502, it's false and misleading labeling because this thing is not a vaccine. There is no benefit to your health when you get injected. The only thing it can do is poison harm and kill. So there's false and misleading labeling. It doesn't tell you that it contains graphinoxide. Adulterated drugs and devices, it also violates Section 501, which again, adulterated drugs and devices, is it includes a toxin, which is the graphinoxide. They also violate Section 312.23 under initial new drug application. So if you go through an I&D, you have to prove safety in animals before you move on to humans. They saw you get a letter of intent for pregnant rats. If that doesn't make you furious and we're injecting pregnant women and under the I&D, it says if they're shedding, if there is a risk to people of childbearing age, then you need to stop the trial. We know there is shedding. We know there is risk to childbearing age. The FDA even talks about it in their protein therapy and on-calytic virus treatments that shedding is a real thing. You need to do animal studies first. Then you need to do phase one human studies. If there is shedding, then you need to come up with control measures so that you don't infect the uninjected, which is what's going on right now. They also violate Section 1-31242, which is clinical research holes and requests for modifications. So that says that any of these things I said, and there's at least three dozen, you need to stop the trials. Trials have been stopped when 25 people die, when six beagle dogs die. They were supposed to stop the trials when they did the mice study and all the mice 80% died in 24 hours and the rest died by the end of the week. But there is no threshold here. Is there? I mean, you should stop the trials at the front. That's the bottom line. There is no threshold. Is there? There is no threshold. How many people die? They will continue this incescent push, won't they? Until American people speak up and say enough is enough, stop it. They will keep pushing us until they basically wipe out America. They're going after the children, which is what's so disheartening. There will be no posterity. There will be no America. The people childbearing age become infertile and children are most graced for having serious adverse events and deaths from these injections. Just look at the myocarditis numbers. There are about 25,000 reported. We know that's at least 10%, which would be 1 in 2,500. It's probably more like 1 in 250, which would be 4% of children are getting decades taken off their life or dying. I am up against a hard break and I have to go. Will you come back on this program because we are dedicated to the truth. You are a wealth of information and I have so many more questions that I would like to continue this conversation with you. Will you promise to come back? Are you comfortable doing that? Oh, yeah. No, I'd love to be honest. If I'm not comfortable answering your question, I'll just say I'm not comfortable answering the question. I'm hoping it's saying that. Yeah, because I mean, I have so many more and I know that there's going to be a pouring out of questions on my social media and my DMs and my proton mail. Please ask her this. And so I just want to reserve the future opportunity to have the conversation with you. Absolutely. And I sent you a lot of the documents from the FDA website and the patent offices. Yes, and we're going to post all of those at stupeders.tv. We're going to post all of those at stupeders.tv. We're going to post all of those at stupeders.tv. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. I drafted letters to healthcare associations and I've just been so busy, but obviously after talking to you, I will finish those letters today so that people can send them to their employer. They can send them to their school. They can send them to healthcare providers saying that either right to inform consent. I'm not saying it's going to stop them from getting fired, but what will happen is eventually justice will prevail and our constitution always prevails. And you will have evidence that they can't they can't plausibly deny if they didn't know this information. I believe that to be 100% true and I appreciate your optimism because that is what I'm trying to hold on to here as well. Unbelievable. Thank you so much for being here. I appreciate that the stupeders show continues in just 60 seconds going to learn. You know what this is, right? Number two pencil. Everybody's got one. Everybody's got everybody members filling out. We should all be filling out our ballots with these number two pencils. That's what we should be doing. But you know, it's in the tip of every number two pencil, right? Led. Put it on paper. Turns into graphene. That's graphite, right? Led. They want to inject you with led. Led is poisonous. Graphene oxide is poisonous. Graphite is poisonous. They want to inject your children with led. But it's just a little bit stew. It's just a little bit. Don't worry about it. Just a tiny little bit of led. Remember when they wanted to inject the world with just a little tiny bit of mercury? It's not going, the point is it's not going to stop unless you stop it. I stop it unless we stop it. And you can no matter what weight, no matter what muscle they come at you with, the federal government propaganda. Not again, if this is it, no, they cannot mandate this. Mandates are not legal, not at work, not at school. No, where they are not legal. They cannot force you to inject yourself or your children with this poison. Please share that video everywhere. We have once again been vindicated. So USA Today leads stories, political, all these other people. You if you Google stew peters and click on news, you'll see right now. No graphene oxide. We showed it in the segment. What are they going to do? Redact, retract, correct? I don't think so. Say no. Do not allow them to do this to you or your kids. Joint pain, muscle pain, ligament pain, arthritis pain, migraine headaches, allergies, stress and anxiety, PTSD, ADHD. You want to deal with these things? You can deal with it holistically and naturally with my CBD company at americafirstoil.com. Verve forever is a veteran owned CBD company and all of the products are sourced right here in the United States of America. You don't know where your CBD is coming from if you're using some other company. Could be China. Could have graphene oxide in it. Nano particles. I don't know. But I do know that it verve forever. None of that stuff. And it sourced right here in the United States and the company is owned by a veteran of the United States Air Force. 50% off right now when you go to americafirstoil.com and use the promo code vet50. Tim Clawm is going to give you 50% off site wide skin care products, bath salts, pain creams, oils for stress and anxiety. So there right now, americafirstoil.com folks use the promo code vet50. Make sure that you tell them that stupider sent you when you go to americafirstoil.com. When they started saying they wanted to go and inject children whose natural immune system is far superior than any vaccine or product could be. I mean, just their natural immune response. You couldn't make something statistically or clinically superior to that. That was when a red flag went off. And I thought I would just start investigating more of the data that I could find online from the FDA filings as well as some of the studies that were done to just prove that it wasn't necessary for children to get injected. And when I found the patents, I was very alarmed because they didn't read as a vaccine. They read as a bioweapon basically. And then I went back and I found some of the original studies where they used back corona viruses and spiked them if you will. They used chimer, they created these chimeric super viruses using HIV glycoproteins and the GAG protein. And it was very alarming and upsetting. And when I realized what americans were making themselves susceptible to, it was an anchor around my heart. I put together a two page email with all the references and the studies and the patents. And I sent it out to about three or so media outlets and influencers. Well, welcome everyone. I'm Dr. Andrew Kaufman, your guest host once again for the Alex Jones show. And thank you so much Alex and Chris Sky for that last segment. It's great to see Chris's courage to be a rebel against the tyranny in Canada. Well, today I have a very special guest as well. Karen Kingston is planning to join us and she is a consultant from the pharmaceutical and medical device industry who has recently decided to go public with some very important information not only about the ingredients in the so-called COVID vaccines, but also some inside information about the clinical trials and some of the obfuscation of data and outcome information that we have seen in the recent past. So Karen, are you with us? Welcome to the Alex Jones show. Hi, I'm can you guys see me hear me? Yes, we do. So Karen, you've been very courageous in the past couple of weeks. Could you tell us a little bit about your background and how you decided to speak publicly about these issues? Sure, I've been in the pharma med device industry for just over 25 years now and I had my own full service consulting agency for a number of years and I've been an independent consultant for the past 10 years. Sometimes I'm an interim CMO or marketing director for international companies, but basically I'm an analyst. So COVID has hired me to take a look at all the clinical data, the IP landscape, med legal regulatory guidelines and legislation, case law, and I basically come up with strategies and messaging to best move forward to continue to grow their market share and also take a look at potential IP extensions for products. Wow, that's quite a broad category of expertise. So this includes like the patent landscape, the intellectual property, it includes regulatory issues as well as marketing and business strategies. Is that am I summing it up correctly? Yeah, because there's strategic business units within companies. So there's portfolios of products that you have to decide what you're going to focus on where you have the greatest opportunity for growth and what you need to discontinue. So you have to understand the your IP as well as a competitive landscape for a long-term growth strategy. Is that any sense? So this? Yes, absolutely. So this must give you a lot of exposure to various inside conversations, correspondence, and back and forth with regulatory agencies that would kind of inform your expertise to the current situation. No, I work directly with the lot of lawyers of the companies or the sea level executives and they're also their clinical staff or MDs and PhDs. So I don't present my own information, I give my information to those individuals and then they present it to the FDA or investors or whatnot, not me. Right, but I mean you see some of the correspondence and you talk to these people, right? So you kind of know a little bit about the workings of the company and the regulation and the industry in general. Oh, yeah, I get the I see the warning letters and things like that. Yeah, and yeah. So what led you to come and speak out with the information that you're currently talking about? Well, I think everyone who works in the industry and understands virus is in pandemics. From the get go, we probably saw back in March last year that it seemed like we were getting set up for vaccine rollout and that was suspicious, but nothing to alarm me, it's kind of like, well, this is big form of doing their thing again. And on I always when I looked at the data, I was like, okay, it's a palliative treatment and which isn't a vaccine and that is what it is. But when they started saying they wanted to go and inject children whose natural immune system is far superior than any vaccine or product could be. I mean, just their natural immune response, you couldn't make something statistically or clinically superior to that. That was when a red flag went off and I thought I would just start investigating more of the data that I could find online from the FDA filings as well as some of the studies that were done to just prove that it wasn't necessary for children to get injected. And when I found the patents, I was very alarmed because they didn't read as a vaccine. They read as a bio weapon basically and then I went back and I found some of the original studies where they used back corona viruses and spiked them if you will, they used chimer, they created these chimeric superviruses using HIV glycoproteins and the gag protein. And it was very alarming and upsetting. And when I realized what Americans were making themselves susceptible to, it was an anchor around my heart. So I put together two page email with all the references and the studies and the patents and I sent it out to about three or so media outlets and influencers. Well, that's fantastic and I'm so glad that you decided to make this important contribution. So let's get right into the vaccine technology and if you could bring up the first slide please. So this is a representation of the ingredients. In the vaccines and I know that Karen you expressed some serious concern about one particular ingredient and if you look at the slide here, it's the longest names. It has crazy names, these chemicals. But if you could go to slide two, Karen, why don't you tell us a little bit about the so-called lipid nanoparticles? Sure. And if you're looking at the ingredient slide, it's that, 80 or so Alpine American that ends in the 2000, the pay 2000. That stands for polyethylene glycol 2000. You can find that listed in the Moderna patent. I think it's on page 29 or 30, the Moderna patent. And so basically the lipid nanoparticles are made up of four lipids. So keep in mind that mRNA or RNA viruses, single-heal expires, are very unstable. 80-degree weather kills them, sunlight kills them, even the inventors of the mRNA vaccine and say, if you look at it wrong, it falls apart. So they need to create a biosphere to protect it. So the biosphere contains four lipids. One is cholesterol, our blood loves cholesterol. The second is a phospholipid. The phospholipid enables the lipid nanoparticle to adhere to the cell membrane for penetration. There's an ionizable lipid, so that gives it a positive ionic charge for penetration. And then there's the pagolated lipid, which is the polyethylene glycol lipid. And all evidence shows, if you take a look at where it's being manufactured and what's in it, it has a graphene oxide in it as well. And graphene oxide can withstand 1700-degree Fahrenheit temperatures, 4000-200-180. So basically the inventors took a very unstable molecule, a single-heal expires RNA or synthetic RNA molecule protein, and they encapsulated it in a biosphere that made it indestructible. Wow. So if I could summarize, Karen, that basically what we have here is that the manufacturers are trying to deliver either a piece of messenger RNA to the cells and the people that are vaccinated. Of course, we know that mRNA as just a standalone molecule. And by the way, the mRNA that's in these injections is actually made synthetically, not by a natural organism. But it's very unstable. So it needs two things. It needs protection. And so these spherical nanoparticles made of these lipids, which are another name for fats, protects it so that it's stable. And then also, it is like a delivery vehicle, right? Kind of like it has the address for a cell written on it. And those lipids help it fuse with the cell membrane and deliver that mRNA. And another name for these lipid nanoparticles is hydrogels. And that's going to be important to see, look at some of the research that we're going to examine with respect to graphene oxide. So once again, we have Karen Kingston, pharmaceutical and biomedical device insider on the Alex Jones show. And I'm your host, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, filling in this week for the fourth hour. And when we come back, we'll be talking more about the ingredients of vaccines with a special focus on graphene oxide and the toxicity of the hydrogel lipid nanoparticles. Hello, and welcome back to the Alex Jones show. Once again, I'm your guest host for this fourth hour, Dr. Andrew Kaufman. And I have with me today, pharmaceutical and medical device industry consultant and insider Karen Kingston. And we had just begin talking about some of the ingredients in the vaccine, specifically the lipid nanoparticles. And if we could have slide number three, this is just a representation to see that these particles actually are distributed very, very widely throughout the body and seem to be concentrated in the, sorry, in the genital and reproductive system. So that's something to be important of. And if we go to the next slide after that, so Karen has uncovered a sort of chain of custody or supply chain of custody of the vaccine manufacturers using graphene oxide in these hydrogel lipid nanoparticles. So Karen, you want to tell us a little bit about what you've uncovered? Andy, I can't, my screen is completely frozen. I'm not sure what you're sharing right now. I'm so sorry. So that's okay. You don't have to worry about what's being shown, but you were talking about uncovering that there's a Chinese manufacturer that makes many of the recipient ingredients for the vaccine. So on the screen, so if you take a look at the ingredients that are listed in the FDA phase three filings and the initially drug application for the MRN vaccines, that's Pfizer and Moderna, you'll see that they have a seven digit alpha numeric names. I believe the Pfizer one you're probably showing is ALC0159. That is the material safety data sheet cast number. If you go to a company called synopec.com, you can search by those cast numbers, the category numbers, and it'll pull up that 80 alpha numeric names of the lipid nanoparticle. And what you'll find is there's a whole tab on COVID-19 recipients for these MRN LNP vaccines. And those are not just for the United States vaccines, but for other vaccines that require this encapsulation. And on the site, they also do talk about how these are polyethylene like called graphene oxide course or shells, or shells. And there's some studies that have been done in animals with the Pfizer biotech vaccine. And what you'll find is those links back to other studies that talk about how these LNPs are used as a thermositic, which is also listed in the variant of vaccine because the graphene oxide is an excellent conductor of electro-magnetic fields for diagnostic purposes. There are no stick stands for therapeutic and diagnostic. And so without seeing this stuff and walking you guys through it, it sounds, you know, there's many documents that tie together and they have the same exact alpha numeric code. They have the same diagrams and you know, they all go back to the patent or this company in China and peer review publications and also chemical and engineering news, which is the non peer review journal for this industry. Right. Now Karen, so you know, it sounds like you've done some real detective work here. And what you're describing is essentially if you track down where the drug companies that make these so-called vaccines actually buy the various ingredients and then you look at various regulatory documents and suppliers and find right buried in their intellectual property and in articles on their website that they're essentially using graphene oxide in combination with these. And this really shouldn't be terribly surprising because after graphene oxide was invented, which led or graphene, which led to a Nobel prize being awarded, the European Union established the graphene flagship, which was a 10 billion euro, sorry, a 1 billion euro enterprise to fund all research related to graphene and much of it was in the biomedical space. So if we look, for example, at slide four, we find that graphene based hydrogels because that's what we're talking about graphene oxide being essentially intermingled with the lipid nanoparticle shell that we see that it is successful for gene delivery, which is exactly what the Moderna and Pfizer products are alleged to do. And if we go to the slide after that, then we'll see that actually graphene oxide has been tested in a flu vaccine before. And one more slide, we can find a coronavirus vaccine patent from China that also uses graphene oxide. And graphene is, you know, talked about as a miracle material because it has some very unusual properties and it can add that functionality that Karen was alluding to for therapeutic, like drug delivery, gene delivery, as well as potentially diagnostic purposes. So we could be injected with nanoparticles to tell us that we are sick. So Karen, please. All right, can I ask what you were saying in regards to graphene oxide? I think it's important for people to know that Moderna was an oncology, a cancer therapy company. It was not a vaccine company. So there's about, I found an over two dozen articles on graphene oxide for ovarian cancer treatment. So I just want to read a couple titles to you to just solidify that Moderna has been researching graphene oxide for various reasons or all of oncology using gene therapy. So graphene oxide, silver, nano composites, enhanced cytotoxic and apoptoxic potential in human ovarian cancer cells. cytotoxic means it kills cells and apoptoxic means cell death. So that's what that means. Sorry, by mispronounced. Reduced graphene oxide, silver, nano particle, nano composites, a potential anti-cancer nanotherapy. This is the International Journal of Nanomedicine. Lipid nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery current perspectives. This is a great one because this actually specifically goes over the mRNA vaccines. This is published in, where is this published? It's an ulcer, ulceria. Sorry, I don't see the publication name on here. Anyway, there's dozens of studies with graphene oxide using that in lipid nanoparticle delivery and ovarian cancer treatment specifically to annihilate or wipe out those ovarian cancer cells. And it's just coincidental that the data from Japan under the cream information I've showed that the lipid nanoparticles go through the blood and then end up in the ovarian's and then as well as in bone canal. Absolutely. And we also know from the study of graphene specifically that it tends to accumulate in organs and tissues over time because the body doesn't have a ready-made mechanism to get rid of it. And Karen, I'm so glad you brought up those cancer research, but really it's just the tip of the iceberg. If you start searching in the medical and scientific literature for biomedical applications of graphene, you're going to be heat overwhelmed with dozens and dozens probably hundreds of articles because there are books published and over a thousand peer-reviewed publications on this topic. So it is highly prominent in the developing technology. And you know, we talked about this also specifically in terms of a gene therapy because that's really what modernist research and product development has been all about. And that is the real technology that is being used for these vaccines. And interestingly though, this has been exploited, special guest, Karen Kingston, pharmaceutical and medical device industry consultant and insider. Welcome back. So Karen, before the break, we were just about to get into the regulatory aspects of the so-called vaccine products. And we have been talking about them as gene therapy, but that's not exactly how they were dealt with by the FDA. Is that correct? That's correct. That was just an intentional misnomer so that they could get the lousy fair no liability under all the vaccine regulatory that allows them to not be reliable for any deaths or injuries due to the vaccine. So there's nothing about them that makes them a vaccine. Dr. Martin went over the US patent office's definition of vaccine, which is that it must prevent infection. And this does not prevent infection. And they actually sent a letter to Dr. Fauci in 2006 saying just because you elicit a immune response doesn't mean it's a immune response that merits a vaccine. So any of you take a look at the FDA trials specifically, I went through a lot of detail in the Pfizer biotech trials. They don't prevent infection as a matter of fact. More patients were presenting with COVID-19 in the vaccine group that it inject in the vaccine group than the placebo group. I mean, wow, yes. And I want to get into the details of that, but we isn't it true that there is actually a regulatory guidance document from the FDA and the health and human services. And if we could bring up slide seven, which is a guidance for gene therapy products. And in this guidance, right, by their own definition, they say a gene therapy product is a product that mediates its effects by translation of transferred genetic material, which is exactly how we've described this vaccine technology. Is it not Karen? Yeah, today is another one of the documents I found on the FDA website. So the mRNA vaccines are, as you said, here they are a synthetic, right? When you play a acid that through translation produces a virion, which is the spike protein in our end to people that are going to have a lot of use. Let's just be clear. It produces the spike protein. A virion would be a complete virus particle with the envelope, the proteins in the envelope as well as the genetic material. But here we don't have a complete genome of a virus organism. We just have actually, I don't even believe it's a complete spike protein gene. I believe it's just a subunit of the spike protein. But we have essentially one gene that is transcribed into a messenger RNA or in the Johnson and Johnson. It's a DNA product, but it's not a complete, it's supposed to basically make a protein, but not a whole virus. Yeah, that's correct. It doesn't create the whole, the whole virus. It's a particle of the virus. Right. And so if we look at the next slide, in this regulatory document, it talks about shedding. So you want to tell us what that is? Yeah, according to the FDA, what they talk about is that when you use gene therapies and your body produces a particle of virus, in this case it would be the spike protein, there is a high risk that those who are injected can then infect the uninjected with that production, that biological production of the spike protein. That's basically what shedding is. They talk about it. So whatever product, basically the gene that they're using in the gene therapy and codes for, right? In this case, it's the spike protein, but like in a cancer patient, it may be related to an oncogene or something like that, right? For a different gene therapy, but that product is a foreign protein, right, to us. And it can be, since it's produced by our body, or at least that's what they tell us, right? It can actually be then in our bodily secretions and can pass to another person, right? Or be transmitted. Yeah, through different ways, respiratory, through your saliva, through your breath, there can be dermal transmission as well. And then they talk about semen, semen and feces. There was an incident in bears where a mother was vaccinated after her second Pfizer vaccine, her student breastfeeding, five month old baby boy, and he died from that vaccine induced naranbo, cytokine and thrombosis. In the news obviously, I'm vaccinated, but we breast milk, there was transmission. Wow, and I'll tell you that I've actually been also part of a survey research that we haven't released fully publicly yet, but we have 5,000 subjects who were interviewed who had various symptoms that are the types of symptoms that people experience from the vaccine. And we did find that people who are intimate partners, right? In other words, they exchange body fluids just like you discussed, now you discussed a parent child with nursing, of course, which is a slightly different relationship. But we found an emphasis significantly increased risk of these symptoms when a intimate partner or family member that there's an exchange of body fluids was vaccinated recently. So this is something that the FDA really knew that was a risk and a possibility. And don't they require this to be looked at in pre-clinical studies? Yeah, they require for it to be looked at in the animal studies, you know, for shedding to then determine whether or not it even merits to move on to human studies. And then in human studies, in the phase one trial, if there is risk to those men and women of childbearing age or transmission to one another, they're supposed to stop a trial. But if you take a look at the phase one protocol in the IND for Pfizer, what they did was they had men who were intimate with women of childbearing age to use two forms of protection. Also, those men were not allowed to be near or around a pregnant woman. If they breathed near one, they had to report it to the same newborn. And women were not allowed to participate if they were trying to get pregnant. And that's completely normal. That's a normal protocol for most studies. But what's not normal is that the male participant isn't even allowed to be around a pregnant woman. And he, you know, if he does be his intimate with a woman, not even getting pregnant, but just intimate with a woman who wasn't participating, they had to report that to the safety before. So the FDA was full aware of the fact that this was high risk of transmission and shedding with the vaccines. But if they excluded those groups from the phase one trial, these studies could have never moved forward to phase two or a screen. Or now this open just free-for-all experiment. So that's what happened. It's quite, they did a lot of just dubious and honestly illegal, lately illegal things and got away with it. Right. So what we can really, you know, see here as you've described is that there are these requirements to look at this issue. It's a known risk. And we know that the FDA knows about this. And we know that Pfizer and Moderna know about this because if we look in their protocols, right, we see that they're actually taking steps to prevent against this. But they did not do the required clinical studies. And in fact, I'll tell you, this is one of the most astounding things that I've discovered about these so-called gene therapy-based vaccines is that they're all supposed to make the vaccinated produce, right, by this recombinant genetic technology, the spike protein in one form or another. But none of these companies, before they put their products on the market, even tested anyone to see if there's actually spike protein in people they gave the vaccine to. There's only one study available that even looks at this at all. And it was done by independent researchers in Canada months after these products were on the market. And it only looks at about a dozen people. And it is not very conclusive. But it's just astonishing that we don't even know if people getting these products actually make the spike protein. Well, I have a great study that an autopsy report that shows that there is spike protein throughout the different systems and organs of person who died from being vaccinated. So I think there's probably evidence we need to continue to look at to prove that my inclination, strong inclination is that they are producing spike protein that is harmful and it seems to be definitely people. Great. And we'll be back after the break. I'm your guest host, Dr. Andrew Kaufman here in this fourth hour with my special guest, Karen Kingston, pharmaceutical medical device industry insider and consultant Karen. I thought for this segment we could review some of the clinical trial data for the vaccines because you have some unique insights about some trickery and playing with numbers here that suggests they're far less effective than are they're touted to be. Sure, if you want to pull up those slides with people to see them. Sure. If we could have slide, love please. I think you start are you starting with the I&D? So the I&D. Well, why don't you just tell us tell the viewers what an I&D is so they understand. Okay. So normally you would finish preclinical trials and show safety and efficacy in animals, which they sketch most of inside letters of intense and then you file an initial new drug application with your preclinical data and you map out what you're going to be doing for your phase one, two trials and phase three in the safety and efficacy endpoints and phase one to quickly includes healthy patients. But this is this is the phase three endpoints. So in the I&D what they talked about was that they would have 44,000 patients enrolled or subjects enrolled for the phase three trial. 22,000 would be injected, 22,000 would be placebo, get saline and they assumed a 1.6% infection rate over a period of six months, which would give them about 165 to 169 infected people in the placebo group and I believe they got less 10 or less in the vaccine group and that would give them a 95% confidence interval of reducing your risk of getting infected by 1% over six months. So it's not very effective in and of itself. But what's very odd is that their primary outcome, they had 169 patients who tested positive via the PCR test one week after the second injection, these people were not injected in the placebo group and only nine in the injection group one week after the second injection and what they concluded was that, hey, this is 95% effective in reducing your risk of getting COVID-19 by 1% for one week after the second injection from the Pfizer group. So it's it's it's focused data and then if you go on to the next slide, you'll see at that same one week time point, if you want to pull it up, there was it's the one before before that. There's another slide I don't know why I saw here in the placebo group, there was something like 400 and or sorry, the placebo group, there's something 289 people that presented with symptoms at the one week mark and there was I believe 407 in the treatment group and so what that showed was they were presenting at the same time point with COVID-19 symptoms but gosh darn it, they didn't have enough time to test those people even though more people were presenting with symptoms in the treatment group and the placebo group, not sure why that's not up but that's in the face the face three trial, the FDA trial. It's in this document here. So what we're saying what you're what you're saying here is that they kind of picked which time points they looked at after administering the vaccines to make sure that they could show that there were fewer cases. Is that it's worse than it's worse than that. At one week they decided to run the PCR test instead of waiting two weeks. So if you look at the CDC website it says you don't produce monoclonal antibodies until two weeks after the second dose, okay. They tested at one week because too many people were getting sick in the treatment group but worse than that they had more people in the treatment group presenting with COVID-19 symptoms than in the placebo group but they decided they ran out of time to test the people in the placebo group or sort of test the people in the treatment group so they just tested the people in the placebo group and said hey look, more people are getting sick in the placebo group. So they think it's horrible what they did. Does that make sense? Sorry. So they just neglected to do the testing? Yes, they just neglected to have taken out the patients in the treatment group. They just they only tested nine of them, not all 400 of them that were sick. Wow. So basically they just omitted the data that would have showed that more people got sick from their vaccine than got sick from any natural cause. Exactly. And this is really not surprising to any of us who have been following the devastating side effects, mortality and serious illness that has occurred in people who have been vaccinated. So essentially what we're seeing here is that Pfizer knew about this up front and covered it up in order to make sure that their authorization went through. So how did they regulators at the FDA not pick up on these discrepancies? They did. They ignored it. I don't understand. Yeah. On October 20 or 22nd of 2020, they had a meeting where they went over all of the serious adverse events that they needed to keep an eye out on for these vaccines prior to authorization. It included Gilles Barg, it included inflammation of the brain, inflammation of the spine, it included myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombocytopenia, thrombosis. I mean the list goes on and on and on. They know these things are not only harmful but potentially lethal. And they just ignored these the fraudulent and erroneous analysis that was done on the data. They just chose to turn a blind eye to it. There's an A&O recording. Yes. When they started asking questions about when we go into more detail about how you measured these outcomes, they just said nothing to see here and move on to the next page. It's recorded. Wow. So what do you think could have been going as what's going on behind the scenes that they're just ignoring this? Are they feeling pressure or are they in co-hutes with the pharmaceutical industry? I mean we certainly know there's a revolving door between various federal regulatory agencies and the industry. But do you have a kind of theory on why they would just let this slide by and gloss over it the way that they did? No, I've never seen anything like this in my entire career and just historical review of any over the counter or pharmaceutical or medical device therapy. This is when POSICOR came out a few people got pacemakers and they recalled it. Resulin was recalled for a liver function test increase. I mean there's all these different recalls. Many drugs don't get to. You need to your safety data to put a stent in your eye and before you can roll it out to thousands of people. Now we've injected over 150 million Americans. I think it's 164 more than 68 now. So there's no explanation from a person with a sound mind and conscience to explain how this happened. So I think that kind of leaves us to speculate that there is some outside influence here that is very, very strong. And I know in the medical service delivery side of the equation like for example in hospitals. Now I've talked with doctors who have tried to speak out a little bit about what's going on like for example saying that their hospitals are empty. And what happens is that the administrators of the hospital you basically censure them give them a stern talking to because as has been reported there are all kinds of financial incentives for the hospitals. They get paid more based on diagnosis using certain procedures like ventilators right. So there could be very similar types of bribery or reimbursement schemes going on here but it shows that there is the ability of whoever is running the show to not just influence one person here or there but systematically to take over the not only the industry, the private corporations in the industry but the government agencies involved to essentially turn to blind eye and let the corporate interests reign supreme with respect to all products COVID. Yeah, to your point I mean there's definitely some monetary incentives for all parties involved here to know a question about that but even being silenced if you speak out I mean if people speak out whether they're scientists or physicians or if they were on the FDA they were going to be ostracized mocked ridiculed and kicked out of the industry so there's that aspect too that you know being shamed and ridiculed on top of you know not being able to financially make an income. So there's a lot of terrible influences that are going on that unfortunately people instead of doing what was right and in good conscience they did what was you know the easiest thing for them to do. Fantastic well Karen I really so much appreciate you taking the time to enlighten us about these aspects and giving us this insider perspective your bravery and courage really makes you stand out and we'll be back on the Alex Jones show again after the break looking forward to seeing you then.