JIM FETZER "Truth vs New$,Inc" (7-29-19)1st.hr. russian hoax implodes

Video Transcript:

You can't handle the truth. All you need to know, when I wake up from creators of this movie can be rewhat? And welcome folks, this is Bruce versus News for July 29th, the end of this life, still a month's already gone. And well, a week we have last week for those Mueller hearings. This week we're also around to the Democratic debates. I will say this is the home of the most dangerous blinds in America's gym pester who's written seven or six books here. And all of a sudden, I say these books are, I say, ideal books. I got them now and I find out that nobody died at San Diego. I can nobody died at Boston either. And I suppose we just go to the moon. The Parkland puzzle or Parkland puzzle. Let's see, political theater and Charlottesville doing this thing which you and your random to Dallas and the world. These books are great and they have an excellent purpose. I find that I have one in the Louvre in the bathroom that I find that it really works. Very good. You just pick up any page and it will really help you along because you'll start out of you. Band on. Band. Yes. Well, there's TV show in the world who got. And standing, standing, standing stuff. This is where you're going to get something that nobody else will let you have. And that's the truth. And I think we'll just start off with the Mueller debacle. Dodgy Bobby Robert Mueller deflected law makers questions 198 times during his testimony on the Russia probe astounding. He asked lawmakers to repeat their questions 30 times, referred to answers to his report 34 times said questions were under purview 10 times. Said he can or won't get into the substance of a question 99 times absolutely stunning. Impressive in the past, maybe because he was tall Craig in hands and might it was a disaster. Despite the high stakes and anticipation, he gave a flat lackluster performance before lawmakers took the stand to provide insight, but he refused to provide any additional details.orthyo has been hold thoroughly around it, he has been Number 1 that we supported with the includes of the without elaboration. However, his team never determined that Trump had committed any crime. He decided against charging Trump for the sake of finishing the investigation. Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decide we would not make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime. Over the course of my career, I've seen a number of challenges to our democracy. Mueller said the Russian government's effort to interfere in our election is among the most serious, but it was all Pobbikok. It was really insulting. And John Redclop made the obvious, but crucial point, namely that Mueller was operating on the presumption that Trump was guilty and less proven innocent, which he called him out. But I believe this may have been the most important five minutes of the entire hearing. Listen up. Umerize your opening statement this morning, you said in volume one on the issue of conspiracy, the special counsel determined that the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities and then in volume two reasons that you explain the special counsel did not make a determination on whether there was an obstruction of justice crime committed by the president. Is that fair? Yes, sir. All right. Now, and explaining the special counsel did not make what you call the traditional prosecution or defamation decision. The report on the bottom of page two volume two reads as follows. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred accordingly. While this report was not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate. Now, I read that correctly. Yes. All right. Now your report and today you said that all times, the special counsel team operated under was guided by and followed justice department policies and principles. So which DOJ policy or principle sets forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal criminal conduct is not conclusively determined. Can you repeat that as part of that question? Yeah. Which DOJ policy or principle set forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal criminal conduct is not conclusively determined. Where does that language come from director? Where is the DOJ policy that says that? Let me make it easier. Can you give an example other than Donald Trump or the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined. I cannot that this is your need. Okay. Well, you can't try to make sure I've got five minutes. Let's just leave it at you can't find it because I'll tell you why it doesn't exist. The special counsel's job. No word does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or that the special counsel reports should determine whether or not to exonerate him. It's not in any of the documents. It's not in your appointment order. It's not in the special counsel regulations. It's not in the oil sea opinions. It's not in the justice manual. And it's not the principles of federal prosecution. No word to those words appear together because respectfully respectfully director. It was not the special counsel's job to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. It exists for everyone. Everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. And because there is a presumption of innocence prosecutors never ever need to conclusively determine it. Now director, the special counsel applied this inverted burden of proof that I can't find and you said doesn't exist anywhere in the department policies and you used it to write a report and the very first line of your report, the very first line of your report says that this morning and authorizes a special counsel to provide the attorney general with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the special counsel. That's the very first one of your report, right? Correct. Here's the problem director. The special counsel didn't do that. On volume one, you did on volume two with respect to potential obstruction of justice. The special counsel made neither a prosecution decision or a declination decision. You made no decision. You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination. So respectfully director, you didn't follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says, right, a confidential report about decisions reached. Nowhere in here does it say right or report about decisions that weren't reached. You wrote 180 pages. 180 pages about decisions that weren't reached about potential crimes that weren't charged. You were decided and respectfully respectfully by doing that, you managed to violate every principle and the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that are charged. So Americans need to know this as they listen to the Democrats and Socialists on the other side of the aisle as they do dramatic readings from this report that volume two of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department and it was written in violation of every DOJ principle about extra prosecutorial commentary. I agree with the chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not about the law. He's not. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. He's not about the law. Paule has written about him, a former federal prosecutor and author of a book about Inron, the failed energy company. Paule explains how Andrew Weissman, the second in command at the Mueller investigation, as a history of using the power of his office to destroy political opponents. Years ago, when Mueller was director of the FBI, he chose Weissman to head the Inron Task Force. Weissman targeted the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, which employed 85,000 people, well, impeccable reputation at the time. It smashed the company, by falsely accusing it of destroying evidence and of committing a crime that does not exist. The Supreme Court would unanimously overturn the case, but by then the damage had been done. Paule says Weissman intimidated witnesses by threatening indictments, created crimes that do not exist, and without evidence it could have aided the accused. Weissman is accused of using the same tactics and the Mueller investigation against Trump. And I think there's really no doubt about Scott. Well, Jim, there's a lot to back into that first segment, starting out with a dotering old fool who resembles Homer Simpson's father. I can't remember my name drooling out the side of his mouth. I don't have any mercy or patience for Mueller because we know he's got blood on his hands from 9-11. We know he was part of the massive conspiracy of 9-11 and covering up the video evidence by confiscating the cameras that were around the Pentagon. We know there was no Pentagon, a plane that hit the Pentagon. I know that with my own eyes because I drove by it the next day. There was no plane, there was no tail, there was no engines, there was no luggage, there was no yellow tape. And of course you've confirmed it in your excellent book, Jim, talking about things like the CNN reporter who came out and said there's no evidence of a plane here. His feed was shut down. So Mueller was part of that cover-up, that conspiracy. The greatest crime in the history of the United States, if not humanity, never mind going back in time. And I think the LaRouche organization does an excellent work in the analysis of Mueller. They've got a publication all about him, as well as the GCHQ and the British ties to the corruption. Mueller, of course, goes back to Oklahoma. So Mueller's not blood on his hands and really should be hung for trees. And that being said, this testimony that he gave, of course, was not the black night sword-wielding Darth Vader shark-cunning, hard-hitting, an aprobat of language and legal razor-sharp precision that people expected or hoped for. The Democrats wanted. And he was just kind of fumbling between medicated breaths, and he was drooling, and he was stuttering, and looks like he was waiting out the time. So everybody pounced on him. Jordan, Gates, Nunez, Ratcliffe. They all really just destroyed him by letting him destroy himself. And the American people sort of heard that, you know, I don't listen to gut-gut-feld, or whatever his name is on Fox. But he said some funny things yesterday. He said, you know, people expected to get puppies when Mueller came. Instead, they got rabies. You know, when Mueller came and they expected to get all these good things, and they got garbage and disease and crap. And that's been the abuse on the American people for two and a half years. The Democrats responsible, Mueller's responsible. But the good thing is the whole story is imploded. It is destroyed itself. And now the Republicans are turning. There's a massive political paradigm shift that's now occurring, and they're going to go on the hunt. They're going to go on the attack. They're going to come in from all sides. All sides are converging on Nazi Germany Berlin. And otherwise known as the Fascist Democrat Party. And they're coming in from Russia. They're coming in from Italy. They're coming in from Normandy. That is a bar inspector general, the reappointment of special CIA and DIA people, including here's the biggest thing that just happened, Jim. John Ratcliffe has now been appointed by President Trump to take over for Dan Coates. So John Ratcliffe, which you just saw in that clip, one of the sword wielding musketeers with a razor sharp rapier of a wordsmith is now going to be going in and taking over for Dan Coates. And I think that's a good sign. Trump needs to fire all of these people that have been in his administration for the last four, three years or whatever it is. They're all worthless except for the new people that seem to be appointed. Now I don't know how good Ratcliffe is or how dirty he is or what, but I'm welcoming a change because we know Bolton's a failure. We know Pompeo's an idiot sluggard. We know Gina Haspel was a traitor. We know these dual Israeli-signed citizens like Segal Mandowecker in the US Department of Treasury who put on sanctions on new horizon conference probably because I went there with Phil Garaldi, with Mike Maloof. Oh. They don't care if artists and banjo-playing musicians go there, but they get the shit-scared out of them when Scott Bennett or Mike Maloof or Phil Garaldi or Jay Michael Springman or other people from the State Department, CIA and such go over there with open hearts and patriotic dreams to say, let's make peace and deal and let's get stability. Let's stop all these wars. And here are the Zionist elements in President Trump's administration undermining all of that. undermining his original promises. undermining his promises to make friends with Russia, get us out of Syria and make hopefully good deals with Iran. But I'll end by saying this is the paradigm shift. This is the moment when the Democrats fall apart. They've destroyed themselves from 2020. I think Donald Trump's reaction on the green of the White House was excellent because he said the Democrats have less than zero. They started with zero now. They're less than zero. They're in debt, right? They're betting and they're hoping and they're borrowing from the bank. And now the American people are going to go, uh-uh. You're done. You're-you're removed from the game. So, uh, with John Ratcliffe and I anticipate other people appointed, you're now going to see people go on the attack and I can't wait and we won't get too much in the Sydney Powell because, uh, I don't want to let the bad guys know. But she's going to be the secret weapon, Jim, because she knows where all of the bodies are buried and she certainly knows shell game and how it relates to all the people. And I'm telling you, I'm looking forward to lining these people up and doing a firing squad like it's never been done before, according to constitutional process, Jim. She appears to be a formidable figure. Yeah, she's what you want. This is really quickly. It looks like what we've seen here is a Peter principle practice to the degree here that people rise into the level of incompetence and beyond. And I think we spent the last couple of years in a real sham. It's just not good. And so, uh, this is a way to run a country and that I think it's time to clear house. Yes, get a lot of their. Sorry to. It's not the Peter principle on its corruption. This level's a corruption. The bigger. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You're in. Nothing short of a disaster for damage. Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testified before the House demonstrating a loose knowledge of his own report, calling even further headaches for the resistance party. Mueller himself warned his testimony would consist solely of his already public 448 page report. See, and our chairwoman, Rona McDaniel, called the hearing political theater. Just like that, both Mueller's prediction and McDaniel's assessment came to fruition. Perhaps Fox News, Chris Wallace described it best when he labeled the charade a disaster for the Democrats in a devastating blow to Mueller's own reputation. So now we know why Mueller didn't want to testify. Now, this article is from Dana Milbach. He's a very, uh, Zynas. I mean, he's a left wing zealot. So Dana Milbach is so troubled by this is very, very telling. This is the best possible spending could put on it. So maybe this is why Robert Mueller didn't want to testify. For two years, he was a silent man behind the curtain, all knowing and all powerful revered by Democrats feared by President Trump. But when he finally sat before Congress for nearly seven hours on Wednesday, the former Special Counsel seemed remarkably weak. He looked dazed and confused as he lists and mouth a gate to his questioners, often struggling to identify who is talking. He stammered, licked his lips, consulted his aide and begged for baritone. Could you repeat that, ma'am? And what was a question, sir? If I might, I'm sorry. Could you again repeat the question? Democrats tried to defend Mueller by recalling his heroism in Vietnam and his lengthy services are Republican appointee. But even this was a struggle. Which President appointed you to become United States Attorney for Massachusetts? That's Representative Greg Stanton, Democrat of Arizona. Which Senator? A Puzzle Mueller asked, which President Stanton repeated? Oh, which President Mueller paused. I think that was President Bush, a buzz in the hearing. According to my notes, it was President Ronald Reagan, Stanton Coach. My mistake, Mueller said. Democrats were disappointed to speak up and speak boldly. Republicans were delighted. But for dishonorable public servant, it was above all a sad coded or a grand career. Sad for Mueller because he did not come off as commanding or authoritative. But more sad for the country because once again, he failed to train the spotlight on ongoing foreign interference in our elections. You didn't think that he was. When he issued his report in the spring, Mueller seemed to be operating under the assumption that everything was on the level that people would digest and analyze his findings. Honestly, in this sense, he is an anachronism. A man from a time when people behaved dishonorably as he does. This was naive. Again, Dana Milbake trying to give his best spin in trying to remain above the fray. He seemed unable to mount the forceful defense needed of his work as staff in the FBI. Meanwhile, he was cautious and lawyerly. Republicans demolished him. Mueller was fundamentally unfair through a bunch of stuff up against the wall to see what would stick. Managed to violate every principle. Roto one sided attack on the president had an amazing double standard. It wasn't guess to stop on a quest to stop Trump. Left out significant ex-culpatory evidence, most regurgitated press stories. We was disruptive to the American people. Repetuated the Russia hoax. Inevitably joined in the attack on this decent man. quoting Fox News Chris Wallace, the president tweeted this has been a disaster for the Democrats. And it is asked for the reputation for Robert Mueller. Sadly, the part about Mueller, Dana, right, was true. But so is the part about the Democrats. Meanwhile, FOIA Doc show the Obama administration pushed the proliferated Russia and proliferated the Russia gate hoax. Conservative is long suspected the Russia gate trail led back to President Obama. He campaigned vigorously for Hillary before the 2016 election. Went on TV numerous times, speaking ill of Donald Trump. It was obvious he did not want Trump to be elected. Newly released documents show those suspicions about Obama and his administration were warned. Thanks to the government watch, dog group Judicial Watch, which I applaud. In the daily caller news foundation, it's obviously Obama State Department help orchestrate the targeting of Donald Trump as early as 2012. Here's what we know for certain from these newly released documents. Obama State Department was at the center of an effort to target President Trump with accusations of collusion with Russia. Emile showed that senior Obama State Department officials orchestrated the advancement of the Russia collusion oaths previous to the 2016 presidential election. One September 2016 email exchange between special coordinator for Libya, Jonathan Winer and Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nulin concerned a face-to-face meeting on a Russian matter. This communication is a special note because Wiener is a close associate to Russian dossier author Christopher Steele. He's been implicated in coordinating with Russian with Hillary associate Sydney Blumenthal and Steele to circulate the anti-Trump dossier. Wiener wrote in the op-ed for the Washington Post also September 2016 in which he stated, Steele and I met in Washington to discuss the information now known as a dossier. I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nulin who indicated that like me. She felt the Secretary of State needed to be made aware of this material, as though she hadn't been behind it from the beginning. One month later, Steele visited the State Department in October 2016 and briefed officials about his work on the infamous dossier. He began investigating Trump in June of 2016 under a contract with Fusion GPS, which was funded by President Yolk Klanidate Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Then assistant Secretary of State Nulin claimed to have first seen the first of Steele's memos, the dossier on June 20th, and the last in mid-July. She told the Senate Committee on Intelligence Chairman Richard Murr as first shown excerpts of the dossier, I believe in mid-July of 2016. It wasn't the complete thing, which I didn't see until it was published in the US press. Loon and told CBS Face the Nation on February 4, 2018 that the FBI should investigate if one candidate or the election as a whole might be influenced by the Russian Federation. She would later claim she was not aware of the Steele State Department briefing until afterward. Another unrelated, yet still terrifying, shocker of these documents showed was the Intel Community Under O'Bamois continuing their unlawful spine on American citizens. The documents noted that 85 percent of all the use extraction of the unasset database was unlawful, and they were searching many of the same Americans repeatedly over different days. This means specific Americans were being targeted, tracked, and monitored. Meanwhile, we have multiple reports of the Mueller hearings having been an mitigated disaster for the Democrats, let me emphasize, and where Scott has noted. Trump has nominated Don Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as Intel Chief, where Coats, it appears, was even the source of an insider memoranda about the resistance within the Trump administration to Trump's own actions and activities as a democratically elected president of the United States, which appears to have been authored by Dan Coats as a then director of national intelligence. Good reddence to Coats, and welcome John Ratcliffe. Scott. Amute. Amute. Yeah, there we go. Yeah, I echo your affirmation, Jim. Dan Coats stepping down is the wise thing that Donald Trump has done. I don't presume to be an expert in his strategic mind. I've criticized him where I think he's made some missteps and got tackled, where he could have scored touchdowns, but at the same time, I applaud when he does score touchdowns. Donald Trump is, of course, far better than anything Hillary Clinton would ever be, and anything the Democrats are. So I think his majority of policies are positive for America, and I think this domestic policy, putting to death, like St. George killing the dragon, is what Trump has accomplished, but really doing nothing but letting this play out. He's been enormously transparent. His lawyers have been transparent. He's got some bad people around him, but at the same time, I think they are being pushed out and eaten away. Donald Trump has had some positive things in that direction, criticizing Bolton and others. But this fundamentally was the singular most significant event in Donald Trump's presidential history, because again, he's put to death the dragon. These Democrats, these fascist, violent, anti-American thugs and bullies and liars supported by their propagandists and the mainstream media at CNN and MSNBC, who have been foremongering themselves and putting this nonsense out there. This is at last coming into the full center of the scope, crosshairs, legal analysis spectrum. And that's all that matters. Emotional politics is one thing, but legal facts and reason and logic and the presentation of evidence in the testimony and the coordination of that linking it to crimes against the American public, federal crimes, treason, abuse of government authority, misprison of treason. I would even add, aiding and abetting terrorist financing. I think the whole reason that this was started, I have said it before, I'll say it again, was because in 2009 and 2012, there were a lot of dirty things that the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton were doing under the guise of the State Department in Libya, in Syria, and elsewhere. And again, Renee Alexander Acosta played a role in it. He played a role in the Swiss bank terrorist financing, UBS case and Hillary Clinton. And everybody in Congress knew about this in 2012. And then it went public through Russian television, crosstalk. And that's when they started, I think, recognizing that there were, they were getting sniper hits from Americans through international TV exposing like a like a redwood tree, being banged up against a drawbridge, this massive corruption, this abuse of government, this pay to play, this incarceration of American citizens like Brad Berkenfeld, like Scott Bennett, the coordination of Julian Assange and Edward Snowden and all of this. That's one of the major mushroom explosions over Hiroshima that occurred and they've been suffering the radioactive toxicity ever since. And Trump knows this and all the others know this, but it's now beginning to, you know, it's really now beginning to wither them and weaken them. So I think all of this is going to be changing in the direction of a full prosecution. The Democrats have nothing. They fired all their ammunition. They don't even have muskets to swing as well. The men and their guns and the, and the woodstock is deteriorating by their own lies. So the Democrats have nothing except to tear their clothes off, light themselves on fire and scream like stuck pigs in the hopes of staring people into, okay, all right, we'll make a deal. What compromise? No, we're not. Here's, here's the thing that I get, the American people have, everybody's thrown up in their life, you know, you get that, you get that upset stomach, you get the watering feeling and the back of your throat and then suddenly whatever was in there, bombets out. I think that's a very applicable analogy to the condition the American people are feeling towards this because it is so complicated unless you've lived it like we have, it's difficult to understand the origins in the process, but every American recognized this Russia hoax with Russia hoax in propaganda was evil was corrupt. There was something wrong. There was something abusive just because of the bullying attitude of these Democrats and nobody, nobody likes white men. I mean, talk about a man you love to hate. This guy is just scum of humanity. Sydney Palmo is a well, but Americans had that upset stomach. And now with all of this testimony, the water and the back of the throat is coming up. Now it is a few seconds before the full vomiting comes out. And that's what Americans are going to do in 2020. It's going to take another six months of layering this, of exposing this, of getting testimony, of putting these people on the stand and watching them stutter and stammer and fall backwards because they're right in the corner. They have nowhere to go and they're going to, they're going to act like traumatic fools. You're going to have false flag shootings like we have in Gilroy. You're going to have all sorts of antipoprotests and and backwards. You may have floods against the border because these are all distraction operations. I know that I worked in this area, deception operations to lure people to look to a different way. You're going to have possible explosions in the Persian Gulf and stuff because all of that is distraction away from the core of the cancer in America is this. It was Obama. It was it started under Bush and Cheney. They should be executed of course too. But it started under Obama and for eight years we've been constipated with all this poison, Trump's the enema, cleaning us out. I'll use that, I like that analogy. But now the American people are really about to vomit it out. And that is they're going to vomit out all the lies and the perversion and the corruption that they've been fed by the Democrats and the media. They're going to they're just they won't take it anymore. When they vomit it out, it's going to be a violent political, not just voting, but they're going to pound their fists on the voting block and say, damn you Democrats, I'm voting Republican just because I'm going to vomit you out like the lukewarm scum water that you are. And I think that you're going to see a devastating overthrow of the Democrats in 2020. And all Trump needs to do is replay this and replay this masterful script. This is the political script politicians are waiting for. He's played defense. And now he can say American people what they did to me, they did to you. They utilized and weaponized the intelligence community, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the State Department. They worked with foreign spies like Christopher Steele at MI6. They enlisted the help of our most trusted allies at Australia and elsewhere and our press were involved. My Galicia cop was involved. Tom Hamburger was involved. The Washington Post, all of these agents were desperate to overthrow your vote, the American people who wanted to change and wanted me to come in as an outsider, as a maverick, as a dynamic, as an expulsion force, as a enema force to clean out all this corruption that's been backed up in the bowels, the American body politic. They wanted to keep all this sickness. And I was exposing it and expelling it. And you now have to expel the Democrats in 2020. Then we can be America a city on a hill, then we can return to peace. Now we can achieve balance in our time and make friends with Russia. Get us out of the Middle East, make a deal with Iran and not be subject to the slavery of Saudi Arabia or Israel. And of course the other thing is Trump is given so much to Israel and Netanyahu with the go on heights and the embassy and now they got a coin with Trump on it. The political advantage now is Trump can set Netanyahu to a corner and say you sit over there, don't talk to me, I'm going to now talk to Iran. And Netanyahu can't make a swapping peat like the Chihuahua he is because Trump's given him the political money. He said here's your embassy, here's your go on heights. Now go sit down and shut up. I'm going to talk to Iran. And that's something the Durand did a very good analysis up. So I think Trump is now in a position, whether he intended it or not, but he's now in a position to do some positive foreign policy stuff like Korea, with Russia and Iran following the Korean model. And expelling all of these people around him for for a new leadership and and Ratcliffe and all of that is coming. And epoch times, Jim, I'll say, and closing is an excellent source. Unclassified on the epoch times on YouTube that does an excellent job consistently connecting this and breaking it down. They missed a few things, but we've been working with them on on a lot of the other stuff. But you're going to see this over the next year, I think, turned into one of the major political communication strategies that Trump can just expel all of these people out. And the American people are going to bomb at them out. They're slow to learn, but when Americans grasp what's really happened here, and I think they do now, they're going to be violent politically overthrowing. They're not going to tolerate one whisper from Artisio Cortez or Il-An Omar or or any of the full presidential candidates on the Democrat side that are up there spouting all their nonsense. American people are just going to say, shut up. You've lied to us for two or three years. You've traumatized us. You've stole our tax money on a report that never should have happened. Jim, go ahead. Yeah, real quick. Go ahead. That's most, most, most, actually, all outstanding, outstanding. And I will say that I think that these people that are all on the wrong side have all been influenced by the deep state and they've been able to be manipulated because they have their personal goals and getting rich and stuff and being influenced above their principles. And so they were manipulated. I mean, they've been fed for the last couple of years. It's much a bullshit. So it's this really really happening. Scott revealed it all a lot of it back in the early 2012 and his book, Shoei Games, Shoei, all the corruption, all the money dealings that brought us to this state here. It's just pretty something. So I really think that we have to just come back and show it all pride and do some good things here. So I think it's time that Republicans and Americans all support the truth and the righteousness instead of going along with his agenda that has destroyed it. Jeffrey Epstein found nearly unconscious. Yeah, this guy. J. Olson, after possible, decided to have it except as a narcissist, he's not going to commit suicide. This may be an attempted murder or strangulation or it might be a gesture to get himself transferred to a hospital. Those are the only options. A multi-millionaire financier was taken to a nearby hospital, unclear how he suffered his neck injuries. Investigators think he might have done it to get himself either on purpose. I rule that out or apply to get transferred out of the jail. Also possible is attacked by another immeasurable. I think that's much more probable. He was, of course, bested on July 6 on sex traffic and in conspiracy charges. We know a lot about it. Epstein being held was found. Sammy Conte, his marks on his neck. In fact, the assault had not been ruled out and that another inmate was questioned. The inmate has been identified as Nicholas Tarteg Lione, according to whose sources, the former police officer in Westchester County was arrested in December 2016, accused of killing four men in alleged cocaine distribution conspiracy, then bearing their bodies in his yard, which is I think quite an open and shut case against him. So he might be very compliant with those who think they could give him a break of either perform actions on their part because there's an awful lot of powerful people who would like nothing better for the Jeffrey Epstein to turn up dead. Meanwhile, why the Epstein Mossad, the honey trap story has disappeared from Kurt Nemo. If you search the news, you'll find very little or nothing in the corporate media about Hito, Jeffrey Epstein's connection to Israeli intelligence. This connection is obvious from his ties to Zionist, less Western, especially as Mossad handler. Grislane Maxwell, the daughter of documented Mossad operative and double agent Robert Maxwell. It's had Grislane at a romantic relationship with him in 1992, but that would appear to be a cover story. Maxwell was rather his Mossad by Aeson. She also procured and trained teenage girls to work as honey traps. The story in the corporate media following Epstein's arrest is that Geesline recruited girls for him and his associates, many rich and influential. It described as simply a pedophile sex ring when it obviously was much more. A black male operation is designed to compromise politicians and others if and when they deviated from the Zionist agenda. This is all-race world and descended into the memory hole. Geesline's focus instead on the appeal of Epstein's bail denial. The red flags raised about his jail records and work released as close ties to Wall Street and Barclays. The tamed on the money gave to Harvard and other institutions over the years. Much attention dwells on the salacious natures of his pedophilia. Meanwhile, this great former labor secretary, Alex Acosta's remarks on Epstein's intelligence connections, which Acosta has since denied fate as a separate corporate sensationalism in my estimate dominate and shape the story. Leslie Wexner has described as the most prominent client of Epstein's alleged money management from however it appears that Wexner was the only client and he wasn't so much a client as a conduit for money poured into a Zionist black male operation. A Twitter account under Quintain theorized that Epstein's main purpose was to black male politicians and wealthy perverts. There's no doubt it really. You don't need to charge up front just get them to have under-aged sex and black male them afterwards for a hush money. Better but you're still a liability producing and receiving big bribe money raises big question. The scheme works just as well. If the billionaires are in on it from the get go is a way to buy sex. I assume that was obvious but perhaps not. There's no need to invoke the mafia Russia, Mossad, CIA etc. That's just needlessly overfitting except it's not overfitting at all. It's the only explanation that makes sense. Undoubtedly Epstein bribed these people to invest in his offshore fund. It's unlikely a criminal scheme like this would have lasted for decades. The wealthy and influential have the money and resources to deal with ordinary black maleers. However, as Robert Maxwell discovered it would be extremely foolish to expose the double-cross-the-most sod or the CIA in Russian intel unless you want to be found floating dead off the Canary Islands or hanging in your mother's backyard. That's so called DC Maddo. Even if a few names are put out there for the sake of a corporate meeting frenzy, the real story will never be fully revealed. Israel will not suffer consequences beyond speculation that it will be dismissed as the anti-Semitic ravings of conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, our ruling elites have no idea how much we want to see them all in prison jumpsuits. This is revealing how much there's a great crisis that we're going to be posited for the next decade. This is the presumption of the 430 and a 4 generational cycle of 80 years that correlates rather neatly with the great crises of the past. 1781, the Revolutionary War and Constitutional Crisis, 1861 Civil War, 1941 World War II, Global War. We'll be the next crisis. Some anticipate another great power. Others a civil war, other a military coup, other the collapse of the economy. However, the author posits a novel crisis, a moral crisis in which people challenge the power of the nation's corrupt ruling elites. Not just elected officials, but the technocrats of the deep state, the vested interests, pillaging the nation, the new overlords of big tech, the financier and new nobility, the corporate media, and the self-serving state corporate technocrat, Nomenclatcher, who do the dirty work for the ruling elite, divide and conquer has been the absurdly easy strategy of the elite, the fragmented disempower of the citizens, its child plague, the seasonally promoted Baker's dozens of divisive issues via the corporate media, and then watch the resulting conflict split the citizens into fragmented core, who sub-divide further with every new toxic injection. A one issue that could unite the fragmented citizenry, however, is moral revulsion. Sign case promises to reveal there's literally no limit to the excess and exploitations of the privileged few in America. No limit on what our ruling elites can do with absolute impunity. The nobility of the feudal era had some reciprocal obligation to its serves. Our new nobility has no obligation to anyone but themselves. It's painfully obvious, there are two sets of laws in America. Bankers can rip off billions in never serve time, members of the protected class sexually exploit, children get a wrist slap if that. Here's the sad reality. Everyone in the ruling elite looks the other way. All the self-described patriots in the intel services, all the technocrats in the departments of Justice State, the Pentagon, and so on. Everybody with any power knows a whole class of ruling elites is completely corrupt by definition to secure power in the US. You have to sell your soul to the devil one way or another. Here is to be the exception. Like all ruling elites, America's are absolutely confident in their power. This is hubris taking a new height. But the citizenry can finally have enough of their corrupt self-serving overlords. It doesn't seem in the realm of possibility to the protected few, but it might actually have it. It seems improbable in such a distracted culture, but consider the chart below even the most distracted fragment of tribe of the peasantry eventually noticed. They're not in the top one percent or the top one tenth of one percent. A ruling elite have no idea how many of us already want to see them in prison jumpsuits. They have no idea how fast the ball revolts in with their corrupt leadership might spread. Scanning the distracted consumer is scrambled from the great heights of their wealth and power, they're wrecking the capacity for moral outrage is limited, leaving them safe from any domestic crusade. But that might prove to be an illusion. Scott. Well, I think that is an excellent demonstration of why the internet and the alternative media are producing such excellent, clear, rational, reasonable communication, scholarship, and presentations of truth. And Don's show is one of those lights that is illuminating the darkness. And this article is exactly that too, Jim. And it's always inspiring to read and to see people saying what we've been saying and think also because it means that America is waking up out of the Ulysses intoxicated lotus flowers. If you recall from Odysseus and his travels when men ate the lotus flower and fell asleep in the fantasy of their dreams, they don't want to wake up. They don't want to come out of that. They want to exist in the perpetual fantasy of intoxicating American patriotism and materialism and everything is great today and it will be the same tomorrow. That's a grand delusion. And those of us who send something as wrong since really the 1990s, I think America started going downhill after the death of Ronald or actually since Ronald Reagan left office and that trader George H. W. The father came in and then Clinton, the pedophile and the rapist and then George Bush, the village idiot and then run by Dick Cheney, the the the Sodomite child molester and then Obama, the transvestite homosexual lover and now the Hillary Clinton, Skigsy and Witch. Donald Trump was a refreshing breath of cleansing again. He is the, I'll say it again, the, the, Don help me out here. What is the term? I was just using the expelling force that removes the toxicity, whatever it is from the the constipation we've been in suffered for the last 20, 30 years. And now we're seeing the ruling elites and their detachment and their abuse of the American people is all becoming very much apparent in the internet days. So one thing that comes out to me, of course, is that the reason that America has has really emerged in such a warm, wandering fashion is because we have projected upon other nations the same reflection of our own fury and discontent. And we think every other nation is as crazy and bloodthirsty as we are. So for that reason, we have to threaten war and build the military and the military industrial complex and and plant bases everywhere across the world. And the world is looking at us with a strangement with a with a detachment almost like you're a mad dog chasing your tail. Iran is not a threat to the United States of America. It is not going to invade Alaska or Florida. It is not, does not have grand designs to conquer the world for Islam. All of that is propaganda. I've been to Iran. I've seen it. I know it. Neither is Russia the existential threat to America. They are all looking at us with an strangement. What is wrong with you? Why are you behaving with such belligerence and animosity? What is the problem? And the problem, of course, is the Zionist element that has been pushing for the geopolitical expansion of Israel using the greater Odinan project and the military industrial complex, which feeds off like parasites, this endless bureaucratic funding of the war complex that's been out of control since September 11, 2001. But all of that I think is coming to a close and the inevitability of a social uprising, a civil war in America is already upon us because conservatives are not starting anything. Contrary to Ilhan Omar's statement that all white men should be recognized as the number one threat to the United States and the real terrorists, which is a blatant lie and a bigoted foolishness. And she's, you know, any good that she said is suddenly destroyed under the weight of that ignorance that corrupt perversion and as well as Ortizio Cortez, the Skigzean witch crew called the squad coming in and regurgitating this violent, fascist, socialistic, environmental worship nonsense is alienating America. The Democrats have alienated America and the Republicans haven't done themselves any favors, but there are there are there's a real resurgence of conservatives, libertarians and Republicans that you see in the appointment of Rackcliffe, you're going to see in Jordan and the removal of people like a mosh and these other, you know, anti-Trump type of personalities, they're they're all being weaned off. And I think the the great thing that is going to happen in in 2020 is going to be the reestablishment, the reawakening of Americans that this country, this constitution, this government belongs to them and this coup d'etat that was attempted to be orchestrated will never be tolerated again and that could come from, you know, also a violent sort of not not physically violent, but a violent political reawakening of the role of sheriffs in counties and the reclaiming of counties and towns and cities in America to be to be controlled not by the federal government by the state government. That's one thing that just emerged out of this false like shooting most likely in Gilroy, the alcohol tobacco and firearms group, the federal agency of alcohol tobacco and firearms supposedly is down at Gilroy investigating due inter operation that is not their purview. They do not have jurisdiction in this matter. It is not a federal matter. So a federal agency cannot set foot on a crime scene because it does a local matter. It is a state of California matter. It is a Gilroy matter. It is not a matter for the alcohol tobacco and firearms federal agency. So these sort of things are need to be stopped and rolled back and hopefully Trump is smart enough to do that through announcing the second amendment executive order that all Americans have direct carry. Go ahead, Jim. Scott, stay with Gilroy for a few more minutes. It seems to me the very presence of ATF there is suspicious in and of itself that this was a contrived event that it's another effort to promote the Democrats gun control agenda. And you before we went on the air, we're talking about how some of the witnesses seem to be in sync with one another as though they were on a script. Would you like to review the bidding there? Because from what I've seen on television, as say in Orlando, you see lots of red lights, lots of vehicles. You don't see any bodies. I saw a noticeable dirt of ambulances. They weren't there in Orlando. They weren't there at Sandy Hook. They weren't there in Boston and it looks as though they're not there in Gilroy either. Well, in Gilroy, they say they've killed a six-year-old boy and something else, but they haven't said how many have been wounded. They haven't said how many shell casings they picked up. And of course, we know the amount of wounded is always at least twice the amount dead. So if you have three dead, you'll have at least six to ten to eighteen wounded because people get ricochet. They get nicked. They get hit in the legs or ankles or whatever it is. That wasn't the case. And the most telling thing on the video, they had two people. They had a woman and a guy, girlfriend, boyfriend, husband, wife, I'm not sure. The guy looked a little militant, big military looking guy or a cop looking guy. Not that bright. And the woman looked sort of a baitish. And they're talking and the reporter said, how would you describe that? And the guy said, oh, this is chaos. You know, and each of us returned to that. The Gilroy shooting, which allegedly just occurred, is now the time to download as much material video that we can before it scrubbed from the internet because as we've seen in the New Zealand shooting, as well as the Las Vegas shooting, oddities and inconsistencies will appear. One of the first ones I've seen were with two people that were interviewed and they both were prompted to say, this was real. This was a real event. The guy said first when the reporter said, how would you summarize it? Well, it was real. And the girl instantly said, yeah, it was real. It was real. So real seemed to be the impressionable part. Now, it also goes like the point here. I don't want prayers. I want gun control. So if you hear that coming out of the future, we don't want prayers. We want gun control. That's the mantra. That's the style. And this is another part of the distraction of the region to pull us away from the real cancer, which is that it's all these data tack and agenda. So the number of cases that we've seen in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, we've seen that in the past, Jim, let me tell you what the other tells was this. Someone wrote into the article, this is on Fox News, you can see this story on Fox News and read it, and allegedly, one witness at a shooting said to the government, why are you doing this? Is someone is going to say, please Mr. Dunham, why are you doing this? Like little Cindy Lou, and when the reason to steal the prison entry, and the guy says in response, because I'm angry, oh, we have a witness, why are you doing this, Mr. Shooter, and he's like, because I'm angry. Yeah, okay, and then I have to tell her, the truth is, the truth is, I feel like I'm here, why is this thing called, it should be fantastic, and it's called, it's like,