HILLARY CLINTON The Genital Mutilator

Please select playlist name from following

Credit to Gregory Malchuk

Africans mustn’t be used as guinea pigs

PEPFAR is a criminal organization.

Hillary Rodham Clinton determined to push 28 million circumcisions.


Circumcision Industry

Africans fighting back.

What even worse is that hard core proponents of circumcision declare that it’s a good defense against HIV and the HPV virus.......which demonstrates the power of one lie, to be built upon another lie.

At this added link, the concrete proof that both HIV and AIDS have never existed in the format we’ve been indoctrinated to believe.

At this added link, the concrete proof HPV doesn’t cause cervical cancer what so ever and that any fear over the HPV viruses is purposely fabricated to sell one of the most toxic vaccines on the planet.....the HPV cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil.

The Penis - Sex Education 101

Anatomy of the Penis: Penile and Foreskin Neurology

Howard Stern interviews TLC Tugger founder Ron Low

Neonatal Circumcision [A video for heathcare professionals]

Things to Know

George Denniston, M.D., M.P.H. on Circumcision

Dr. Christopher Fletcher Denounces Circumcision of Children

Ronald Goldman testifies on circumcision trauma

Gerald Wald - Circumcision
The case against circumcision
~ George Hill Vice-President for
Bioethics and Medical Science
for Doctors Opposing Circumcision…/The_Case_Against_Circumcision

The foreskin: Why is it such a secret in North America?

Unspoken Aspects of having a Foreskin

A short history of circumcision in the United States: Part 1

The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision

50 Reasons to Leave It Alone


Circ info - Quranic Path

Judaism Circ Resources

Beyond the Bris

There is nothing inherently gross, wrong with, or defective with the male body in its natural, unaltered state & claiming otherwise is sexist body shaming.

Those who are having their foreskins forcibly removed are having their human rights to bodily integrity & equal protections under the law violated, & therefore are prohibited from being able to exercise their right to auto-determination - due only to their gender.

Boys and girls alike: The ethics of male and female “circumcision”

NOCIRC Amicus Curiae Brief


Doctors Opposing Circumcision Genital Integrity
Policy Statement Ch10

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Cutting off part of a helpless person’s body to suit our preferences would obviously be wrong for anything else - but people have blinders on whenever our present institutions tell them something is beneficial.

Do we view forced mutilation (proper terminology - not shaming) as a method of hygiene for any other body part?

First, do no harm & if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Re-framing the mutilation of an infant as a parental rights issue is disingenuous, & completely overlooks the fact that the baby is a human being with rights of their own.

Parental rights, do not grant the authority to take unnecessary liberties with another’s body or sexuality - such as forcing risky, potentially lethal procedures - violating, mutilating, & removing an important, integral part of their sexual anatomy - permanently altering & impeding its natural functions.

Human Rights



Please login to comment