JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal' (8-28-19) Trump has converted to Judaism

Video Transcript:

So here we are once again covering the latest events of the past week here on the raw deal where I, Jim Fetzler, and your host, and we begin with G7, which most of you know doubt are familiar with already mixed signals over the trade war with China and riffs over Iran dominated the meeting with leaders of the world's most powerful democracies. It turned out that Trump has expressed frustration over pre-Summit media reports focusing on his status as an outlier among the G7 allies on numerous issues, meaning that he was holding his own position in contra distinction to those of the others. Those differences were serious enough that in playing the summit President of France, Macron, and Jettison plans for a traditional joint statement from the seven leaders, acknowledging getting all of them on the same page with our president would be difficult if not impossible. Nevertheless, throughout the meeting, Trump appeared determined to portray himself as in sync with the other leaders despite evidence to the contrary. Most significantly, I think, and frankly, I give Trump credit for this. He brought up the idea of re-inviting Russia to join the G7 to restore the old G8, which fell apart after the alleged Russian annexation of Crimea, which of course occurred as the result of a referendum in accordance with international law. I think that this was particularly significant given the extent to which that for two and a half years or more, Trump has been massively attacked by the Liberals' latest conspiracy theory to which Russia had intervened in our elections. If only the Donald had played and replayed Barack Obama talking at length in the Rose Garden about how anyone who thinks is possible to hack our elections doesn't know what they're talking about, that might have done a lot to quill liberal hysteria. But of course, their candidate lost, and they've never been able to forgive the Donald for being the instrument that brought that about. President Emanuel Macron during a seaside meeting during which the President raised the idea of bringing Russia back into the fold. Macron and the European Council President Donald Tusk opposed his suggestion. Frankly, I think that Trump is on the right and they are on the wrong. Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte was reportedly the only G7 leader to disembark Trump's position. Conte had announced his resignation earlier this week. Meanwhile, the President who views Russian interference in the U.S. elections as a joke, it's actually much more serious than that. It was a form of treason. Which Putin should be in on the group's discussions about Iran, Syria, and North Korea. I couldn't agree more. Despite White House concerns over Iran, the following morning, U.S. officials were surprised by Macron's invitation to Italian Foreign Minister Mohammed Zaryf, which were intended to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East. He arrived and an unannounced visit held a meeting with President Macron who had volunteered to facilitate dialogue between the U.S. and Iran. American officials told Reuters his appearance had caught them by surprise. However, the President has now revealed he encouraged Macron to go ahead and continue talks with Tehran. Meanwhile, we had a report from RT about while his visit was not a surprise, it was still too soon. Meaning with Iranian Foreign Minister G7 was premature for the U.S. delegation Donald Trump said amid reports he was blindsided by the top diplomat surprise appearance at the summit. I doubt very much Macron could have gone forward without letting the President know. Now just as that was from RT, here's another extremely interesting piece from RT, commenting on the U.S. media and how the mainstream is hurling fake anti-Semitism charges against Trump rather than question his real evidently profound loyalty to Israel. And in the subsequent story, you'll see why those concerns are extraordinarily well-founded. The media has willfully misread every Senator Donald Trump's words to portray the most pro-Israeli President in history as an anti-Semite. It makes more sense to chide him for sacrificing U.S. interest to please Benjamin Netanyahu. Here is the full Trump quote from Tuesday in which he rejected Democrat Bernie Sanders' idea that Israel should stop accepting American aid after its reluctance to let in Congress women ill on Omar and Rashida Talib who have publicly endorsed the BDS campaign for which I salute them, which I also endorsed. Here is the quote from Trump. The concept of even talking about this even three years ago of cutting off Israel because of two people who hate Israel and hate Jewish people, I can't believe we're even having this conversation, Trump said. I believe in properly implying that the Congress women or anti-Semitic, I don't believe that. I do believe they're profoundly anti-Israel and have massive criticisms of the actions and policies of the Israeli government as do I and most thoughtful American citizens as well. Trump continued, where has the Democratic Party gone? Where have they gone when they're defending these two people over the state of Israel? I think any Jewish people who vote for a Democrat shows either a total lack of knowledge or greatness loyalty. Well, that's pretty fascinating claim. There's no ambiguity to this quote, our tea observes. Trump says it's bizarre that Democrats prioritize Omar and Talib over maintaining Washington's historic good relation with Israel and that Jews who support the Democratic Party are being disloyal, either to fellow Jews or to the state of Israel. Trump is not using the dual allegiance trope de Boyd since ancient times in which Jews living in foreign countries are accused of putting their ethnicity and religion above their citizenship. Although I must say that has been a very serious question that deserves further contemplation. On the contrary, he has urging American Jews to show more of a dual allegiance to remember their roots and back their historic kin living in Israel. The media has either pretended the two sentiments are the same or that the greatness loyalty mentioned by Trump related to the United States or to him personally, which, however, makes no sense within the context. To perpetuate the confusion, it is leveraged Jewish voices to deliver the judgment. Though notably, the ostensibly neutral ones actually stop short of calling the U.S. President in anti-Semite. The American Jewish Committee called the comments divisive. Yet, I defamationly merely urged him to stop using Jews as a political football. It is, however, the leftist Jewish organizations that have unsurprisingly joined in the chorus of condemnation with a pro-Palestinian Jewish group, J. Street, calling them disgusting. And the Jewish Democratic Council of America, the largest such liberal group, that accused Trump of weaponizing anti-Semitism, in turn, Republican Jews have defended the White House. Perhaps the harshest charge it could be fairly leveled at the President here is lumping together American and Israeli Jews, same as when he referred to Netanyahu as your prime minister in a speech to Jewish U.S. Republicans in March. But that still doesn't make him an anti-Semite more over. It could be argued that if anyone could be accused of having a dual allegiance, it's not American Jews, but Donald Trump himself. Yes, recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, sought to limit the definition of Palestinian and refugee in cut funding to the UN refugee organization supporting them, pulled the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal, condemned by Netanyahu, and is widely expected to imminently recognize permanent Israeli claims to Jewish settlement territories in the West Bank, as well as, of course, proclaiming the Goal on Heights to be a part of Israel, leading some to suggest the Israelis will rename it Trump Heights. Whether he's done this due to his affinity with the Israeli prime minister, with whom he appears to share political DNA, or as a principled ideological stance, he has risked his relationship with Europe, the Muslim world, and international bodies at every turn. Here's one critique. Trump says, jump, Netanyahu asks, how high? I think the situation were likely the opposite. Netanyahu says, jump, Trump says, how high. No wonder he's surprised that despite this nearly four and five Jews continue to vote Democrat, despite most of them telling bolsters that they feel close to their ancestral homeland. American outlets have occasionally challenged Trump's unabashed support of Israel, as part of its campaign to portray him as a dangerous manor in the international arena. But the media also wants to keep the anti-Semitism card in its back pocket at all times, pulling it out as part of the increasingly relentless drive to portray him as a white supremacist man in racist racism. While the foreign policy criticism is more substantive, the race stuff is juicier and sells better to a domestic American audience. But by alternating between calling him a craze-inist and an anti-Semi, the media has defused the power of its indiscriminate assault on Trump, shown itself to have less consistency and integrity than the U.S. president himself, and has given him an oddly easy ride on his Middle East policy. Now, here's a fairly stunning development with which I'm confident most of you are completely unfamiliar. This is an article published in February 24, 2019, a few months back. Israel today news, friends of David Goldberg. Donald Trump converted to Judaism two years ago, according to White House official. The story has already been held by CNN's editors for months, but has due to be released within the next few days, except, of course, it didn't happen. David Elias Goldberg, a fellow at the Jewish Center for Anti-Semitic Study, has also interviewed the White House's source. According to her, the story is that the White House is a very important part of the story. According to her, Trump was pushed by his daughter Ivanka and his son-in-law, Geron, to join the faith. At first, Trump was resistant, stating it could threaten his base of evangelical Christian voters. However, he had a change of heart and officially converted in early 2017. The ceremony was held in private and closely guarded now for nearly two years. And if here is a White House, it's prepared to slowly release this information in my summer. It has expected Trump will fully address his new faith in an evening televised news conference, but, of course, that has not come to pass. Now David Goldberg has an interview with his White House insider who was fired for revealing that Trump is a Jew. It runs about five minutes, but it's well worth listening to. So I now play it in its entirety. Hello, everyone. This is David Goldberg again. If you've been paying attention to my channel, if you've been listening to what's going on, you know that I was poisoned or are said poisoning less than about two weeks ago. I'm doing much better, but they seem to be very nervous about what I'm revealing on my channel. We have inside information. We have secret information that no one knows. First of all, Donald Trump converted the Judaism two years ago. Secondly, Donald Trump believes that Joe Kushner is the mashera of the Messiah, the Jewish Mishat Messiah. No one knows this information. Beyond that, we are learning more and more about what's going on in the White House because of the person who I've been communicating with, who worked there, is about. Unfortunately, is the bell has been fired. They seem to get out. They found out that she was talking to me. We've been getting all the news agencies. They won't talk to us. I know a lot of people. I know people are CNN. I know people to New York Times. I know people to New Yorker. I know people at the New York Post. I've been talking to them, communicating with them. A lot of them are really good people. And I've known for 25 years, but now they won't publish this information. There's something going on. I'm starting to question my own people. I'm starting to question the Jews and Zionists in the White House. They are not working for an agenda that I can be a part of anymore. I'm very concerned. Now I have this bell on the phone. Is the bell on you there? Right, they're the Zionists. Good. I can hear you pretty well. I think this is going to be OK. Is the bell. It's true that you were fired last week. That is correct. I am totally about it. That is the case, yes? OK. How do you feel about that? I'm not happy. It's what a fire under my hands, though. The bell makes me want to get this information out of them all. I feel that I did the right thing. And it's just the same as people. Well, clearly they're upset with you that I don't have to want you to do. You have a lot of very, very sensitive information. Not prompt and the Kushner and what's going on. What I can't believe is that you're under you proud of all of this. I was very happy to hear the Trump converted to Judaism, but it's becoming clear. That's cool. Don't want this information out. Is that your assessment? But if you want to be a Jew, I don't want you to be a Jew. Can I go? Say that again. What? I don't want you to be proud to be a Jew. Personally, I don't want you to be one. And then I won't get you. You know, I'm not very proud, but I'm seeing that my own people are working against us. I feel that people in the White House are not working in our favor. There's something some kind of a gender going on. I mean, they just don't have to kill me. And they have poisoned me and they have fired her due. And they're born to be a woman. I've been like before, but I just want to say it again. I'm worried about you. And I'm so sorry that this has happened. Well, it's a shock to my system. I've been fighting for Jewish issues. I've been fighting against unassumable Judaism and my entire life. I know a lot of wonderful Jews here in New York. But now I'm seeing a different side of things. They want to shut me up. The people in the press will talk to me and they won't publish the story anymore. I've been able to get the stories. I've been able to get the stories for 25 years. And now this happens and everyone goes silent. And then they fire you. And our channel is being attacked by anti-Semites. There's something very strange going on. But White House doesn't want this information up. This is terrible. Well, it's very terrible, yes. Visible, thank you for joining me. I know you're under a lot of stress. Is there anything else you want to add? Is there anything else? What did they say to you when they fired you? Well, they said that they are. They knew what I was up to. You know, they said that I had signed non-disclosure agreements. But I looked at the contract. I'd been lucky if I wasn't sued. Right. In a fair bond. In a fair, I took advantage of it. I took the piece to be known. It does need to be known. I'm not surprised that eventually this might happen. I'm so disappointed in the White House. Why do they want to cover up the Trump as a Jew? Why do they want to cover up the Trump things? He should be proud of it. Mr. Beside. The freak is the freak. Why are they covered up? He wants to be reelected. He wants to be reelected. He wants to be reelected. This is going to hurt him so bad that they don't want the information out. Right. Yeah. OK. Is the bill thank you for joining me? If anybody else listening, please, I need to support. We need to get the information out. Donald Trump is a Jew. Donald Trump, please, Christianism, asylum. There's all kinds of other things going on. Thank you for joining me. We'll get up another video soon. Now mind you, I don't think that David Goldberg was being attacked by anti-Semites, but rather by those who want to protect, can see the fact that Trump appeared still of undergone a conversion to Judaism from the American people. And of course, when I said this was news, you would not have heard. I should have added, unless you listen to the last two shows on Friday and on Sunday with RIP, because I use these stories as an introduction to the conversation we had then. I have no reason to doubt the authenticity. And the fact that David Goldberg has now been found dead in his New York apartment. After predicting there would be a series of false-flag attacks to lay the foundation for the Iran War, where it seems to me an equally powerful motive would have been that he was revealing that Donald Trump is a Jew, which is politically explosive, given his role in relation to foreign policy. And where I expect that this is going to affect a lot of us in our evaluation of Donald Trump, but where he stands. Remember, as I've reported numerous times, the mainstream media has completely dominated my Zionist in Neocons, where I have a panel of 100 executives with CNN, all of whom are dual U.S. Israeli citizens, another panel of 100 executives from NBC, all of whom are dual U.S. Israeli citizens, another panel from the New York Times. Of 100 executives, all of whom are dual U.S. American citizens. This, in my opinion, is a serious problem. But the hammer appears to have come down on David Goldberg. This post is from June 11th. David Goldberg was found dead in his New York apartment on June 8th. The death has been investigated, but at this time, authorities again, no indication is the cause of death. He was 59. Friends of Mr. Goldberg believe he was murdered and did not pass away of natural causes. This friends were also given access to his accounts before passing. They will be maintaining them and posting new information as it comes in. So now, the blog is entitled Israel News today, Friends of David Goldberg news and updates related to David Goldberg's 1959 to 2019 predictions of the Rand War and Paul Flags, which will proceed it. And they ought to add, of Donald Trump's conversion to Judaism. This blog continues at this time, they're reviewing made documents in Mr. Goldberg's possession, some of which appear to be top secret in White House memos. The documents and much of what he posted on his YouTube account relates to the upcoming plan to Rand War, which will be precipitated by a series of false flags conducted by the United States and Israel, of that there can be no doubt. Mr. Goldberg's Rand War false flag video is posted on April 14, 2019, titled White House Insider, Tactical Nukes and Ground Invasion Plan for Iran, as well as many subsequent videos. This blog post on April 18 also offered further details of the planned war. Since originally posting the videos, and New York Times confirmed a month later, Mr. Goldberg's prediction that the White House is planning to use exactly 120,000 ground troops that must have some religious significance for the invasion. Mr. Goldberg and based his information on secret memos given to him by the White House source who featured it in a number of his videos. Meanwhile, DC Dave Martin has a fascinating piece about Israel's murder incorporated in the assassination of James Forestall. I'm suggesting David Goldberg was probably also taken out by the Mossad in order to silence him, so it wasn't in I semi-tubent attacking his blog. It's been the Israeli Mossad who wants to keep this information from the American people. Meanwhile, Dr. Ewan has published a wonderful blog about Pierce Morgan on the media has turned left, and the left has become unbearable. This is from her blog. Pierce Morgan, 54, is an English journalist, broadcaster, and TV personality. I was no fan of Morgan. He was especially loathsome when he hosted Pierce Morgan Live on CNN from 2011 to 2014 after which he returned to the UK. On the Ben Shapiro show last Sunday, August 18, 2019, Morgan launched into a stinging critique of the contemporary left, which had gone viral on Twitter, which just does to show even a self-identified pro-gun control liberal, like Pierce Morgan is that enough with so-called liberals. Here's what Morgan says. I think a lot of people who should be impartial journalists and masquerades in partial journalists are now lifting for being celebrities. And right now in America and Trump's America, the only way to be a celebrated journalist is predominantly to be a liberal Trump-hating journalist, and that's where it gets dangerous. When I look at CNN, for example, when I was there, the standards and practices around impartiality were extremely, extremely rigorously enforced. You could not remotely be seen to be partial politically. Now, I look at CNN. I just see open steering that Trump 24 or 7. Things have changed. When I was there, you couldn't do that. And I think that's problematic. America needs CNN to be impartial. You know, you have MSNBC on the left. You have Fox on the right. People have always understood that. If CNN itself becomes partial in partisan, I find that a big problem. I've never known it like it is now continues, Pierce Morgan. And I think it's been massively exacerbating by social media. It feels like we've gone back 2,000 years and we're back into tribes. You have it with Trump here in America, where it's just in the line. You have to be in one tribe or another. You're not allowed to actually say, well, on the one hand, he's done good things here, here, here. On the other hand, I don't like what he's doing there. It's everything about this man. Everything he doesn't say. Every time he breaks a win, it offends me. Or I love him. And everything he does is fantastic. Even when Trump does something ridiculous. The most important thing is to maintain the ability to have a democratic debate with people. And to sit with people that you fundamentally don't agree with, and to listen to things you find fundamentally offensive, but you actually respect someone's right to think differently than you. It's the inability to have a debate without wanting to cancel people to wrench their lives, to make them lose their jobs. Referring to universities in the UK and Berkeley de-platforming speakers, not allowing invited speakers to speak. What's the point of being at a university if you're not going there to be challenged and to have your own views challenged? I couldn't agree more. Interestingly, now we have a new study confirming exactly what Pierce Morgan was repeating. To it, study confirms what we've been saying all along. CNN, MSNBC push, biased news. Conservatives of long-contended broadcast and cable news networks are biased in the reporting. Those same networks dismiss that claim as baseless. Now the Media Research Center, MRC, has the data that proves what those on the right knew from experience. The MRC studies show CNN and MSNBC post-democratic representatives and senators seven times more frequently. Seven times more frequently than the Republican counterparts. The study also shows that even when networks like CNN interview are Republican, they use Democrat talking points as a basis for questioning. The Compilates report MRC randomly selected three weeks of every broadcast on CNN and MSNBC in the hours from 6 a.m. to midnight Easter. The weeks of January 7th, two-lavath March 25th to 29th and June 10th of 14th offered 540 hours of programming to consider for the study. MSNBC, surprise, surprise, was the most partisan where it interviewed congressional Democrats 13 times, not 13 more, 13 times more than the Republican counterparts. During those sample weeks, MSNBC featured 148 Republicans and only 11, 148 Democrats and only 11 Republicans. CNN wasn't much better with a ratio of 136 Democrats to 29 Republicans. Although Republicans hold the majority in the Senate, 87% of interviews by the two networks involved Democrats. Of 103 interviews considered 90 were with Democrats, just 10 Republicans. This disparity is made worse by the fact mainstream media journalists do not conduct equally hard-hitting interviews with both sides. Both CNN and MSNBC routinely ask adversarial questions of Republicans that favor the Democrat agenda. With those networks featured Republican panelists, they are never Trumpers like Bill Christel. I've seen it again and again and again. The methodologies by MRC is that an agenda question was defined as one in which the interview we used recognizable talking points from the opposing party. Republican guests were posed with a total of 310 questions in which just over half reflected the agenda of one party or the other. But that is where fair and balanced ended. Of those 156 questions that reflected the agenda of one party or the other, 97% reflected in adversarial pro-democrat agenda. Only four questions showed a friendlier Republic of agenda. Democrats experienced markedly more hospitable question the MRC study showed. Of 660 questions identified as having a partisan tilt, out of 1,653 total questions, 535 81% were based on a friendly Democratic agenda, while the remaining 125 or 19% asked Democrats to respond in adversarial Republic of agenda. Why am I not surprised? Meanwhile, and it looks as though this is how it's plain now, Democratic presidential candidate Reverend Zamptolsi Gabbard hit the Democratic National Committee over its polling criteria for upcoming primary debates asking it to ensure transparency and fairness in selecting the qualifying surveys. The campaign noted that Gabbard has exceeded 2% in 26, 26 national and early state polls, but said only two of those are on DNC's certified list, even as many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations, such as the economist and the Boston Globe, a ranked by real clear politics in 538 is more accurate than some of the DNC certified polls. Obviously, this was their more subtle method of sabotaging Tulsies campaign, where they use much more blatant methods in the DNC to sabotage burnings. I repeat a recent essay by John Kominsky about puppets for present, why people don't vote, because Jews have final say on who becomes our leaders. Something happened shortly after September 11, 2001 that has subsequently changed the nature of the USA, or maybe it just accelerated a process that had been long developing but had yet to emerge into full view. The exact moment came when George W. Bush stood in front of the ruins of the world trade, they are in dead to the world, they hate our freedoms. And suddenly the brains of all Americans were damaged, when they accepted his ridiculous assertion as the true explanation for the disaster because it wasn't. Those who really hate our freedoms have been our recent presidents and their puppet masters who chose them to this very day. They continue to cover up the real 9-11 story, which has you who listened to this show are well aware, namely that 9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neal cons and the Department of Defense, the vast majority of whom were dual US's Rayleigh citizens, him the most sought, where the objective was to draw the United States into endless wars in the Middle East to take out the modern era of state that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually to confront the Persian nation of Iran. Meanwhile, Kaminsky writes about Tulsi and Ron Paul. Rompersam Tulsi Gabbard seems the only semi-legit candidate among the field of radical democratic communists trained for president in the 2020 election. But it's already obvious that Gabbard suffers from the same Jewish media induced disease that scuttled the recent presidential cannesty of Maverick, Texas, for every senator Ron Paul in two elections, in fact, despite that in both races he was the clear popular favorite of the American people who turned out in droves to boost his campaign. Instead, the Jewish media tried to convince us we wanted fixer Mitt Romney in Monster John McCain and instead we got the mysterious Barack Obama, not even a US citizen shoved down our throats. Gabbard destroyed media darling Kamala Harris in recent debate, yet the Jewish networks now declare Harris a favorite in Gabbard and also Ron. The media spooks that you run CNN continued to berate Gabbard as a traitor for visiting Syrian President Assad in an attempt to get a better idea of what was actually happening to yet another country, Israel was trashing with US troops. For this Gabbard is declared an enemy. Of course, when McCain went over to a bet the creation of ISIS as part of the US attempt at regime change in Syria, Jew media brazed his visit. Here we have two glaring examples among many more of how Jewish media determined who becomes the American president by controlling the narrative of all public media in the United States and even around the world to a great extent. The most flaring example of this ubiquitous campaign is the positioning of black men and white women on every single newscast in the nation, as well as in all the position of characters and advertising of every tie, the subtle promotion of misogynation, interracial marriage and reproduction as a way of undermining the social structures of white countries. I gotta say I agree 100 percent I found it bizarre. Now frequently we see these black white couples in advertising and as though that were the NOR. Meanwhile, Henry Samson published a brilliant piece you can find on my blog at JamesFensor.org. Is the DNC establishment backing Trump while rigging the nomination against Bernie and Tulsi? Henry Samson. This is the question that was asked by great many DNC's CDP members last weekend as they tried to understand the scheduling debacle that pitted the Democratic National Committee meeting in San Francisco against the California Democratic Party meeting in San Jose one to three hours away depending on traffic. On the two main days for both events, August 23rd and 24th, attendees had to choose which to attend and which to miss. It turns out that the CDP that would be the California Democratic Party did better on overall attendance than the DNC which, of course, is a Democratic National Committee. When Tom Perez spoke, there are about a hundred delegates in the DNC the crowd significantly increased when Bernie spoke at the CDP meeting the crowd in the general session range from about 300 to 500 that's still relatively modest. As Bernie was about to speak at the DNC Friday afternoon meeting, Kamala Harris's supporters loudly walked out of a hole and continued to make noise outside and this seeming attempt to drown out Bernie. One might think this would create this favor with the DNC. However, most party leaders said they were supporting the Harris-Warren ticket leading some progressives to wonder if this was an officially sanctioned front against Bernie. The DNC was in charge of the microphone volume and there was no lack of security to handle the problem. Harris-Warren ticket. I'm more and more gravitating toward a Sanders-Gabber ticket. I mean, yes, Bernie Sanders-Tolsey-Gabberd I think would make up a very attractive ticket to many Americans. It may be something that's going to emerge. If Bernie finds his campaign scottled once again, he missed an opportunity to lead a third party in combination with Jill Stein who invited him to run on a green party ticket with her. Bernie ought to have done it. I believe he'd done so. He would be in the White House today. Congresswoman Tolsie-Gabberd who gave up her DNC career to back Bernie Sanders in 2016 is a candidate that establishes most fears. Tolsie is more than meant to debate criteria in the number of unique donations and poll numbers in 26 of the most respected national polls. But the DNC, if you're in she will take down another establishment candidate, is refusing to let Tolsie into the third debate against candidates who have lower polling numbers in most polls and significantly fewer unique contributions than Tolsie. The problem or maybe plan is that the smaller DNC approved polls have mostly been avoiding polling over the last month as a block to allowing Tolsie into the third debate. In other words, I simply discontinued polling after the second debate that would have shown Tolsie could easily transcend the 2% requirement. Bernie activists who've reportedly learned the DNC plans to go after him once Tolsie is out of the way chose not to take things lying down. Tolsie is like only candidate with a history of having Bernie's back. Several activists went to party leaders and asked point blank whether blocking popular candidates like Tolsie Gabbard and Bernie Sanders from being nominated would be with a second term for Donald Trump. The surprise of the act that his leaders spoken to were clear that holding Bernie and Tolsie to the contract they were forced to sign before the first debate was more important than fairness in beating Donald Trump. Some leaders talked about which candidates they planned to run in 2014 if Trump were reelected and assisted the one of the party bosses who has not to be identified for fear of losing his job pointed out that the DNC actually makes more money as a result of anger about Donald Trump's presidency than they would have a popular progressive such as Bernie Sanders or Tolsie Gabbard became president. One person pointed out that a ticket with Warren and Harris would be labeled progressive and the expected loss would be used to McGauvin or kill the progressive movement within the party. And I do believe a Warren Kamala Harris ticket would be doomed to defeat. Tolsie Gabbard had been redeployed prior to the DNC meeting and was only able to attend by a pre-recorded video, interestingly, at the DNC where table was placed in a corner away from everyone. The supporters in her table were told to sit there like good little children. One Tolsie supporter broke them old and handed out copies of Senator Mike Gravel's endorsement letter of Tolsie inside the DNC meeting. The letter on Gravel's stationery called Tolsie the most qualified and prepared candidate. At the California Democratic Party event, the Gabbard supporters weren't sitting in a corner. Everyone who attended the larger CDP meeting received a copy of Gravel's endorsement letter in other literature and supported Gabbard. It was reported that over a thousand pieces of Tolsie literature were distributed to Democrats attending the CDP executive board meeting in caucus. The attendees there were greeted by a giant volunteer printed banner at the ballroom door at both general sessions. Toped behind the scene, DNC leader Bob Moulin was seen studying Tolsie's military picture on the banner. I dare say, and I repeat, I think of Bernie Sanders Tolsie Gabbard ticket would be a winner in that it would have the potential to defeat Donald Trump. And although, as you will see, we're getting lots of poll results that claim that all these Democrats could be Trump, don't believe them for a minute anymore than you should have believed all those polls showing that Hillary Clinton was a shoe in, where they were a guaranteeing it was 99 to one chance that she would lose, and where Trump supporters might as well not even bother to show up at the polls. So here we have a new 2020 poll showing a three-way time on Sandersward and Biden. A new national policy suggests the race for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination may be tightening with a virtual three-way tie among former vice president Joseph R. Biden and two more progressive rivals, senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Despite the dead heat, Mr. Sanders and Ms. Warren, each with 20% support of one Democratic voters, Mr. Biden with 19, the bond with the University of Poland released Monday may hit at a concerning trend for the candidacy of Mr. Biden, the polls previous Trump winner, who's support declined from 32% when the mom of the poll was taken in June. Mr. Sanders of Vermont, the Ms. Warren of Massachusetts, both picked up several percentage points of support since June. voters would ask who they could support among 23 Democratic candidates. Patrick Murray runs the polling institute of mom with in West Long branch New Jersey, said the polls suggested the race for Democratic presidential nomination was heating up. The main takeaway from this poll is that the Democratic races become volatile, Mr. Murray said. Liberal voters are starting to cast about for a candidate they can identify with. Moderate voters who have been paid less attention seem to be expressing doubts about Biden. And now we have what it appears to 10 Democrats who are going to be on the campaign platform. Not including Tulsi Gabbard, which I regard as a gross insult to the American people in a corrupt act by the Democratic National Committee. Ms. Warren's favorable reigns also improve while Mr. Biden slipped and Mr. Sanders remains stable. All only one poll, the results seem to bolster findings of a poll released by the economist and you, God, that also hit it in a tight race. Join Mr. Biden with 22% Sanders 19 and Warren 18. That poll 72% of Democrats gave a favorable rating to Ms. Warren. Two points higher than Mr. Biden's rating of 70. Sanders favorable was 65. In interviews in Iowa, some of Biden supporters have indicated they lack enthusiasm for his candidacy. Suggesting that his strong poll numbers may mask his softness and his support. In a statement, the Biden campaign suggests that the poll was an outlier, noting it was based on a relatively small sample size and that in average of national polls, calculated by real clear politics with the former Vice President ahead, with 27.2% to Mr. Sanders 16.7 and Ms. Warren 16.2. But don't be fooled. That Biden candidacy is extremely, extremely soft. So here's a real clear, a politics summary of the polling data from the Emerson poll, the Hill Politico economist, Monmouth CNN, where Emerson had Biden up by 7. They held Biden by 13. Politico Biden by 13. Economist Biden by 3. Monmouth, Thai CNN Biden by 14. But I'm telling you, it's only going to take one commercial to destroy Biden's candidacy. When Christopher Coons and Delaware was sworn in in the Oval Office, Joe Biden was there. And after the sworn in, he leaned down to Coons' daughter and said to her, and it was caught on mic, and you can find it reported on articles that appeared at the time. Do you have any idea how horny it makes me to be standing next to a 13-year-old girl? Anyone who wants to vote for Joe Biden after hearing him make that comment needs to have their head examined. He's not known as creepy Joe for nothing. And of course his gaps have grown to be historic, recently making an appearance in New Hampshire. He talked about how wonderful it was to be in Vermont. Maybe he was thinking about Bernie Sanders, who's breathing down his neck. I tell you, a Bernie Gabbard ticket would be the strongest Democrats could put forth. And the Democrats are afraid of Tulsi because she speaks the truth. She have viscerated Kamala Harris whose popularity has been falling ever since. Tulsi skewered her and they are afraid that she's going to expose weaknesses in other candidates, which is an absurdity. Better to get them out now, have the sorting take place during the primary, than to have one of them be a big target for Donald Trump during the general campaign. Joe Biden, I submit, would be one of the easiest for Donald Trump to take down. Mark my words. And now we're heading to our break. I so appreciate you being here. I'm telling you the DNC is still a clown act and they're sorting out the most important and interesting candidate of the ball. I'm going to have to go back to the point where I'm going to have to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go back to the point where I'm going to go ahead and gayinnen for a term for Ventures Welcome to Rev 대해서 employee where movies are scheduled Now, here at Revolutionary We'll leave for that. This will be one of the cast hours of the news and information each and every day. Revolution Radio never sleeps. Revolution Radio is worldwide, the pointless information. Revolution Radio is also commercial free. Revolution Radioox supported 100% by U-Dolarsness. And that's why we need to appeal to you to donate and support this nation, and its expenses. You can support us in many available options like our kinds of subscriptions, our seed packs, our light shins, or even my woodworking store. And we also even have Revolution Radio swag, and the Revolution Radio's has a sore when you get t-shirts, coffee cups, even a baby one, or if you can just wing, donate to the dogs. And we will not continue without your support, and your support is that helps. So please, if you want us to continue, we stop by our station support page and drop a dime on us. Revolution Radio, we're information. You never sleep. Revolution Radio, we're information. Revolution Radio, we're information. Revolution Radio, we're information. Revolution Radio, we're information. Revolution Radio, we're information. But the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bombspot activities, and the one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the globe had announced. Appearing to the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood. The blood only showed up later and came out of the tube. They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine. Don't let yourself be played. Check out and nobody died in Boston either available at moonrotbooks.com. That's moonrotbooks.com. Is your time to say you have an necessary information to assist you in confident we're living through just about any survival situation. Survival, you're gardening, off-grid living, medical knowledge, or even natural or man-made MMPs on your list of personal concerns. Do you have your documents and your personal information in a safe place in your hands where you know where it is? Well, check out our re-loaded MMP proofs on Drieden. We're three gigs of survival documents and how-tos. Plus, the USDA Offline Food Preservation website and much, much more, including a surprise bonus. We just can't tell you about it. With plenty of work left over to story your most important documents. Imagine if a megabyte of research computer failure took out your bank or all the banks to that matter. Are your bankier records safe in your hands? So when they get things fixed and repaired, you can say, hey, look, this is what I had. You have it. I want it back. We're going to save family records, addresses, phone numbers, and squeeze on over to FreedomSlims.com. Yes, that's www.FreedomSlims.com. Click the banner on the homepage for the EMP proof bullet drive to get the full scoop of everything that we offer. So folks, keep your data safe for your peace of mind. Revolution Radio, FreedomSlims.com. You don't need to expect us. We're already in. This is the people's wall. It is our wall. We are the fighters. Fight it then. Fight it with all it is in us. And may God defend the right. Warning, warning. We've got to stop us. They're going to kill us all. See how the time of your service. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. We've got to stop them. You won't go out, you could go out! You're throwing them out blackgroups! You're throwing them out blackgroups! You're throwing them out blackgroups! You're throwing them out blackgroups. You're throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. princess thunder. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You were throwing them out blackgroups. You're throwing them out blackgroups. I knew it was there. Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy. I knew it was there. Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy. But did you know that it was a bean-sized job that Osama had nothing to do with it? That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro-news. That building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives mounted in the building. Very chennels was there. He heard them go off and built himself stepping over dead people. The US Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event. Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position. 9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Musa. Don't let yourself be played. Read American Nuke on 9-11. Adelotnumrothbooks.com. That's numrothbooks.com. Extend to bite really works. Just listen to what some people have to say. Several years ago, I was developing a very severe situation I'd call it my flippy heart. It was just was doing that good thing. And I did not want to go to a medical doctor because I just knew they would give me a cover up pill. I didn't want to get onto that sort of thing at all. When I learned it was garlic and cayenne and cayenne is a healer. It is a wonderful herb. I said, I think I'm on to something here. I'll tell you I wouldn't be without it. It didn't wonderful things for me. Extend to bite is only $69.95 for a two month supply of either capsules or link them. Call now. That's 1-877-928-8822 or visit partdrop.com. Extend your life with the sand of ice. The opinions expressed on this radio station. It's programs and its website. By the hosts, guests and column listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed that they do not necessarily represent the opinions of revolution radio and freedom slips dot on its staff or fillings. You're listening to revolution radio freedom slips dot com 100% this is their supported radio and now we return you to your host. This is that Jim Fetzer continuing with most important news of the week. The ramifications of the collapse of the Russia hoax are continuing and will become far more abundant and widespread and compelling. I understand my little book exposing the Russia hoax should now be available as an ebook and as a paperback. Check it out if you want a short take 132 page summary overview. And then if you want to go into greater depth go for Greg Jarrett's book the Russia hoax which is available on Amazon dot com. Meanwhile Lindsey Graham has reported that Horowitz this is the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Justice will offer the Senate chilling testimony on FISA abuse. This has to do with the origins of the Russia hoax where you may recall Robert Mueller was completely unfamiliar never heard a Gwen Simpson or fusion GPS obviously hadn't written the report that more is named. Senate judiciary chairman Lindsey Graham confirmed Wednesday justice department inspector general Michael Horowitz will testify in front of the community committee. The South Carolina Republic and predicted the Horowitz will give quote chilling testimony in front of the committee about his highly anticipated report on potential abuse of the foreign intelligence of valence act once the report is public. This of course includes the use of the fabricated Russian dossier by Christopher steel the former UK spy master who was being funded my Hillary Clinton and the DNC. This is just disgusting beyond belief. Meanwhile for those of you who watch the video you'll see we have here a wonderful political cartoon of a little umbrella saying vice of you review report but during the hand in the letters IT apostrophe as coming with a Democrat in a raincoat because it's going to be coming down hard. It's going to be a lot of it is going to be very messy and very sticky and very odiferous mark my words meanwhile Supreme Court Ginsburg treated for tumor on the pancreas. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has completed radiation therapy for cancerous tumor on the pancreas. No evidence of the disease remaining the Supreme Court said Friday a biopsy performed on July 30th confirmed a localized malignant tumor Ginsburg 86 underwent a three week course of radiation therapy and as part of her treatment had a bile duct stint placed it said the court said Ginsburg tolerate treatment well and does not need any additional but will continue to have periodic blood tests and scans. The tumor was treated definitively and there's no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body. Ginsburg underwent lung cancer surgery in December has had two previous bouts with cancer she had colorectal in 1999 pancreatic 2009 while recovering from surgery. She missed arguments at the court in January her first illness related absence in more than 25 years as a justice. Meanwhile this with a scare into the Democratic Party. David Axelrod warned Supreme Court vacancy fight could tear this country apart. It didn't take long. A former Obama advisor set the stage for a potentially nasty confirmation fight in the Senate next year within an hour of the Supreme Court announcing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently completed three weeks of radiation treatment after doctors found a localized cancerous tumor on her pancreas. If there is a status vacancy next year and Senate majority leader carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it despite his own previous press and blocking garland it will tear this country apart David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon. He was referring to House Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said earlier this year that the Senate would consider a presidential nominee to fill a vacancy on the court if one occurred in 2020. Oh, we'll fill it can talking republicans at an event in May even though the Senate had opposed confirming garland on the eve of an election when President Obama was president which is the purported press that's to which David Axelrod referred. That upset Democrats remember the role McConnell played in blocking consideration of then President Barack Obama's nominee Marika Garland the field of seat vacated by the death of Justice and tone and Skelly of 2016. At the time he defended republicans decision not to hold a confirmation hearing for Garland because it was a presidential election year. Facing accusation of hypocrisy after McConnell seemingly changes mind this year his office claimed the senator was being consistent because he stressed that the issue three years ago was that the White House and Senate were held by different parties in 2020. Well the White House and the Senate will be in republican control. So we have what is forthcoming meanwhile there's a very fine article by Kurt Schlechter entitled opinion get ready for apocalypse Ruth which is also on my blog at James Fetzer dot org. Kurt Schlechter progressives ghoulish glee over the death of an old man turned into barely constrained panic when later that day it was revealed that their heroin Ruth batter Ginsburg was just treated for pancreatic cancer yet again. Their disgraceful joy at David coach passing was yet another reminder of the harsh truth that left us want you dad or in slight. Coat sin was it he disagreed with liberals no one embarked ways also with conservatives for that these creeps dance around like idiots celebrating his economy and they'll celebrate when you die too always believe people who tell you they hate you and want you dead. Oh and never disarmed he's got that right meanwhile the potential nominee who I think is filling the democrats with with the drab Amy Coney Bartlett in November 2017 president Trump released a revised list of potential Supreme court nominees. The November 2017 list was an expanded version of two earlier announced during the 2016 presidential campaign from which then candidate Trump led if election. If elected to pick a successor to the late justice and tone in Scalia who died on trebrary 13th 2016. First on the new list because it was an alphabetical order was Amy Coney Barrett a Notre Dame law professor and former Scalia clerk who had recently been confirmed to a seat on the US court of appeals for the seventh circuit. Barrett's confirmation hearings had received considerable attention after democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee most notably senator Diane Vineside of California grilled her on the role of her Catholic faith and judging. Vinestein's criticism did not stop Barrett from being confirmed and since then there has been speculation that may have in fact strengthened her case to fill the seat. That will be vacated by the retirement of justice Anthony Kennedy. I might mention that all the justices on the court are either Catholics or Jews to mean that's rather extraordinary. I don't regard that as remotely appropriate but that's the way it is. Here's a fascinating development faithless elector a court ruling just changed how we pick our president. The decision could give a single elector the power to decide the outcome of a presidential election. If the popular vote results in an apparent electoral college taught. Very interesting. A federal appeals court ruled eight Tuesday that presidential electors who cast the actual ballots for president and vice president are free to vote as they wish and cannot be required to follow the results of the popular vote in their states. The decision could give a single elector the power to decide the outcome of a presidential election. If the popular vote results in an apparent electoral college taught. This issue could be a take in time bomb in our divided politics. It's not hard to imagine how a single faithless elector voting differently than his or her state did could swing a close presidential election. Said Mark Murray NBC News senior political editor. It hasn't been much of an issue in American political history because when an elector refuses to follow the results of a state's popular vote. The state simply throws the ballot away. But Tuesday's ruling says states cannot do that. The decision from a three judge panel of the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver is a victory for Michael Bacca a Colorado Democrat elector in 2016 under state law. He was required to cast his ballot for Hillary Clinton to one of the state's popular vote in the state he crossed out her name and wrote in John casage or Republican then then the governor of Ohio. The secretary state removed Bacca as an elector discarded his vote and brought in another elector who voted for Hillary in a two to one decision. The Pills Court said the nullification of Bacca's vote was unconstitutional. When voters go to the polls and presidential races, they actually cast their votes for a slate of electors chosen by the political parties of the nominees. States are free to choose their electors however they want. Tuesday's ruling said and can even require electors to pledge their loyalty to their political parties. But once the electors are chosen and reported in December to cast their votes as members of the electoral college, they are fulfilling a federal function in a state's authority as ended. The state's power to appoint electors does not include the power to remove them or nullify their votes. He has a constitution that contains no requirement for electors to follow the wishes of a political party. Well, the electors once appointed are free to vote as they choose, assuming they cast their vote for a legally qualified candidate. Think about it. Now you can have the president chosen by the electoral college in a very literal rather than merely symbolic sense. A total of 30 states have laws that bind electors requiring them to cast their votes for whichever candidate won that state's popular vote. But the laws are weak providing only nominal penalties for what are known as faithless electors who fail to conform to the popular vote. The Supreme Court ruled in 1952 that states do not violate the constitution when they require electors to pledge that they will abide by the popular vote. But the justices have never said whether it is constitutional to enforce those pledges. Legal scholars said Tuesday's ruling was the first from a federal appeals court on the issue of faithless electors that applies immediately to the six states of the 10th Circuit, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas, the six states of the 10th Circuit, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico. This court decision takes power from Colorado voters and sets a dangerous precedent set, gender, griswold, Colorado, Secretary of State. Our nation stands on the principle of one person to one vote. We are reviewing this decision with our attorneys and will vigorously protect Colorado voters. The federal court ruling conflicts with a decision from the state of Washington, Supreme Court in May, which said electors must follow the results of the popular vote. The power of electors to vote comes from the state and the electors has no personal right to that role. The court said where I agree with a washi, then Supreme Court and not with the Colorado. Meanwhile, we have developments in the Middle East related, for example, to Iran's defensive capabilities where they have now displayed. They have a new Bayvar 373 system. This is an anti-missile missile system capable of neutralizing aerial targets and high-speed ballistic missiles that is viewed as comparable to the S-400, one of the most superior anti-missile systems in the world, which comes from Russia. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin is ordered Russian to respond after a U.S. missile test. Now this in my opinion is profoundly disturbing. President Vladimir Putin is ordered the Russian military to find a quid pro quo response after the test of a new U.S. missile man under a now-deformed arms treaty. Moscow. President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian military to respond to the test of a new missile that was manned under the INF or any media range nuclear forces treaty, which had banned missiles that could strike targets more than 500 to 5500 kilometers away. That's 310 miles to 3,400. The test came after Moscow and Washington withdrew from the 1987 intermediate range nuclear forces treaty. It was a modified, brown-launched version of a U.S. Navy Tomahawk cruise missile. Speaking at a meeting of his security council, Putin charged the U.S. wage a propaganda campaign, alleging Russian breaches of the pact to untie its hands to deploy the previously banned missiles. In different parts of the world, he ordered the defense ministry and other agencies to take comprehensive measures to prepare a symmetric answer. The U.S. said it withdrew from the treaty because of Russian violations. The Russian government claimed that Moscow has denied that we are the liars here and the Russians are speaking the truth. In an interview this week with Fox News, the defense secretary, Mark Esfer asserted that the Russian cruise missiles Washington is long claim of violation of the now-deformed intermediate range nuclear forces or INF treaty might be armed with nuclear warheads. Right now, Russia has possibly nuclear-tipped cruise, INF range cruise missiles facing toward Europe. And that's not a good thing, Esfer said. The Russian leader noted that Sunday's test was performed from a launch or similar to those deployed at a U.S. missile defense site in Romania. He argued that the Romanian facilitating and prospective similar sight in Poland could also be loaded with missiles intended to hit round targets instead of interceptors. Let me just emphasize what a gross abuse of an international treaty as the United States having missile batteries in Poland and Romania. When the dissolution of the Soviet Union was negotiated between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, the United States entered into solemn treaties, perhaps the most solemn of its entire history with the then Soviet Union. That it would not encroach on Eastern lock nations, it would now become sovereign and independent states. Which we held true, until the candidacy, the presidency of Bill Clinton, to begin militarizing and encroaching. We promised we'd not make any effort to convert them into NATO nations. We have in fact gone far beyond that to placing these missile batteries all along the border of Russia on the fabricated pretext of defending against an imaginary Iranian threat. It was all bullshit. And now the crows are coming to ruse. How would we know what they will deploy in Romanian Poland, missile defense system, or strike missile systems with a significant range butonset? Russia has long charts that U.S. launchers loaded with missile defense interceptors can be used for firing, service to service missiles. Putin said Sunday says, prove the U.S. denial has been false. It's indisputable now. He added the missile test came just 16 days after the INF Treaty's termination, showing the U.S. had long since started work on these new systems banned by the treaty. But Putin hasn't spelled out possible retaliatory measures. So Moscow based military expert theorized that Russia could adapt the C-launch, caliber, mid-cruis missile for use from ground launchers. The Interfax News Agency quoted a retired Russian general Vladimir Bogateriyov and saying that Moscow could put such missiles in Cuba or Venezuela if the U.S. deployed new missiles near Russian borders. Putin said Russia will continue working on new weapons and response to the U.S. moves but will keep a tight lid on spending. Mind you, that makes these missile systems ideal for a first strike because it provides only minutes to respond because the range is so short. And therefore I am sorry to say but it appears to me that Vladimir Putin is going to be eventually forced to the conclusion that Russia has to do something about these threats. And if Russia concludes it must do something to these threats and I would qualify them as posing an imminent threat to Russia, which means that even under the U.N. Charter Russia would be entitled to a first strike against an imminent threat that will not be partial, that it will be very comprehensive. This Vladimir Putin guy, very shrewd, very smart. Russia has the best military equipment in the world, bar none. Makes the United States look like second or third world equipment. And the reason of course is the Russians aren't having to deal with the profit margins of private contractors. The Russians get what they pay for and it's very high quality. American contractors know that if they have equipment that's shoddy and requires constant maintenance they're going to make more and more money at taxpayer expense alas. Meanwhile, Israel is preparing to bomb the Houthis in Yemen to warn them away from Iran. This is again extraordinarily troubling. Israel is planning to bomb Houthi and Hezmah targets in Yemen to keep them from receiving weapons from Iran following several Israeli attacks on Iraqi targets. Kuwaiti media have reported. Israeli forces are preparing to target resistance forces in southwestern Yemen near the Bab Ilman-Dab straight. According to Kuwaiti paper, Al-Jajarda pressed TV reported on Friday. Mosad and Israeli military intelligence are on the hunt for any attempts by Iran to deliver weapons and the Houthis have transferred some of their drones and missiles to Iraq to confuse the Israelis. By the way, you know, the Houthis are in the right here, the US because it's supporting Saudi Arabia, which is trying to wipe them out is on the wrong. The Houthis are trying to reestablish democracy and freedom in Yemen. The United States claims it's in the Middle East of remote democracy and freedom that that's an absurd allegation only, only gullible Americans believe it because we're subjected to non-stop propaganda 24-7 by the mainstream media. Iraq closed its airspace last week to all unauth