9/11 Phantom Planes: IMPOSSIBLE COLLISIONS Prove Video CGI Trickery; Official Story Death Knell

Video Transcript:

Today I want to cover one of the most important mysteries of 9-11. The Phantom Plains. The North Tower was hit first and there was only one video of that crash. And it's a little bit blurry hard to tell exactly what happened. But in this video I want to focus on the second crash. On the reverse side of where the North Tower got struck, the South Tower was struck. And since there is a lot of attention on the towers, more video exists of the South Tower getting hit. But the bizarre footage of the South Tower getting hit raises many questions. Why did the planes fly right through the face of the building? No parts broke off. It didn't crumple up, it didn't slow down, it just went right into the building. This defies the laws of physics. For a hollowed out aluminum airplane. To act like a phantom. Gliding in, fusing right into the side of the building. With no resistance. It didn't crumple up and no parts broke off. The fuselage, the body of the plane and the wings don't change shape whatsoever. So let's dive into the mystery of the Phantom Plains. This was the footage that was handed to the world on the mainstream news channels. Seven sixty-seven's. Crashing into the steel and concrete edifices of the Twin Towers. And yet somehow. Define all laws of physics. They don't crumple up. They don't slow down. They fuse right into the side of these massive skyscrapers. Us independent researchers have poured over all of the available footage. Frame by frame. And something is very wrong here. You don't see any pieces bounce off the tower. You don't see the wings clip off. Rather we see these wings fuse right in as well. Disappearing as if they're Phantom wings. This is flat out impossible. How can we explain these nonsensical collisions? If you look at the plane it doesn't look like it actually crashes. The plane doesn't even slow down. It doesn't crumple up. Nothing bounces off. No pieces fly off. A hollowed out seven sixty-seven would crumple up. That we see the tail enter the building intact. This is a Phantom plane and it just disappears into the 3D space of the building. The plane doesn't crumple up. No parts fly off. Nothing breaks off and falls off. The plane doesn't even slow down. The conclusion I've come to after analyzing hours and hours and hours of footage. And thinking about this for years and years. Is that what we're seeing on the screen right now when we watch the plane go into the South Tower? Our computer-generated graphics. I think some of the footage is real. But the plane is superimposed. It's a graphical layer. Add it into the film. And I realize this is an uncomfortable conclusion. And not one that I want to come to. Other than the fact that I want the truth. An aluminum plane would slow down to some degree. It would crumple up. And it wouldn't just fuse in in its exact same shape. So I think we can rule out that this is footage of a passenger jet flying into a steel and concrete skyscraper. According to the official explanation, these are supposed to be airplanes. Hollowed out aluminum airplanes. The way they enter the building makes absolutely zero sense. So first the North Tower gets hit. And there's only one video of the North Tower getting hit. And that was from two French brothers filming a documentary with the New York Fire Department. And they were just randomly in the streets of New York with the view of the Twin Towers and the face they got hit by the first plane. And the story was they were looking into a gas leak. And then they heard some noise overhead. The camera pans up and follows the plane. And you see it explode into the side of the building. At least seemingly. If we get on that, I have to leave the other thing. I have to leave. But what's most interesting about the timeline is that all of the attention was then on this big open gas. In the first tower, everybody was looking at this huge gas in this famous New York skyscraper. Well, where did the second plane hit on the reverse side? So if you're looking at the gas of the North Tower, the buildings would obstruct your view of where the second plane would hit. To me, this wreaks of classic misdirection, one of the key weapons in the magician's arsenal. So the world was blindsided by a big fireball. Taking everybody by surprise. But could this also have spared the wizards of Oz, the more difficult task of creating a 3D render in near real time of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center? They'd have some more time behind the scenes if that was the case. But somehow, despite this, we were still able to get a lot of footage of the South Tower getting hit. Of course, a lot more cameras were on these buildings at that point. But most of the cameras were fixed on the first tower's gash. But some of the most spectacular shots of the South Tower getting hit, the second tower getting hit, were actually fixed on the face of the South Tower. And some of the times by skilled 3D artists. Now, I can't stop wondering if this was all a misdirection to minimize the amount of amateur footage of the South Tower getting hit. So they could control the best shots the public had, the best vantage points. And I still find it remarkable that more amateur footage doesn't exist. But let's look at one of the most widely circulated shots of the South Tower getting hit. This video was credited to Canadian 3D image expert, Luke Corsesna. For some reason, Luke decided to get a right up close to the South Tower, the complete opposite side of where the plane hit the North Tower. That's a little suspicious in its own right. As much as I love to have video that we can analyze, it's a little bit strange that a Canadian 3D expert would be a New York City and would station up on the opposite side of the action of the Twin Towers. But there's much more here that needs to be unpacked with this footage. Let's watch this footage in its entirety and take note of the noise. The audio. I find this entirely unbelievable audio. Oh, yeah, it's a bit of a nightmare. What's that? Yeah. What's that? Yeah. What's that? Yeah. What's that? What's that? It's a bit of a fool. I think it's a bit of a fool. Oh, man. I'm so excited. How strange that an award winning 3D artist from Canada was in New York on 9-11-2001. And despite an ongoing evacuation order, he decided to station up looking at the face of the South Tower which was about to be hit. With his camera fixed on the part of the building that was about to be hit, he captured one of the most spectacular sights of 9-11. The impossible plane crash. And what do we see right before the plane crash? Well, the engines are doing all sorts of crazy things. This is a warped-looking plane as it approaches the tower. Almost as if it's a 3D glitch of trying to position that plane layer resulting in warping. Disproportionality. Non-parallel lines that should be parallel. The engines should be parallel. Obviously, to the fuselage. And this next footage which shows us the same phantom plane. Flying into the building without decelerating, without bouncing off, without crumpling up. This next video of the phantom plane was shot by Evan Fairbanks, who just happened to be on the scene doing work at a nearby church. So the story goes. Despite all the aspects we talked about previously. Such as the fact the plane doesn't crumple up as you would expect. No piece is bounce off. There's no deceleration, etc., etc. What I think is most peculiar about this shot is that you can see the reflection in a bizarrely placed car windscreen. So you see the camera looking up and you have to wonder how is this shot even obtained? He says he's looking through the viewfinder. Yet he's down below this other man. His pupils happen to be censored out. But the strangest part of this footage is that somehow Evan Fairbanks stationed up on the other side for where the North Tower was hit. Where he can see practically none of that part of the story. The North Tower having just been hit, there's this smoke pouring out. People apparently are jumping from the building as the story goes. But he decides to get on the entirely opposite side. And film right where the plane is about to go into the building. The second plane. And he positions in such a way that he's looking up down below this other man in the blue shirt. Just picture the perspective here. But the strangest part is that there's a windshield, a car windshield at the bottom of the shot. And you can actually see the reflection of the plane going into the building in that shot. Another thing I think is peculiar is you can never find the audio of this video. There's other footage from Evan where you can hear people yelling, get down, get down and you see the paper falling to the ground. So there's other video that Evan shot with audio. But I've never seen a version of this video with Evan's original audio, which is very peculiar. But it's very strange that we have this man on the left that we're looking up at. And you see his shock and terror when the second plane hits. And he recoils a bit. And his people is blurred out, blacked out. Which isn't a very common thing to do. But stranger still we somehow see the plane going into the building in the reflection of the car window, which somehow made its way into this shot. What is up with this perspective? What is up with the plane crash itself? Or lack of crash? The plane just goes right into the building with no resistance. Like somebody diving into a swimming pool. No crumpling, no deceleration. Nothing. It just slides in like a hot knife through butter. This is not how collisions work. This is an extremely strange shot all things considered. ABC News had on Evan Fairbanks for an interview. Let me play that for you. I was just a little bit nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. I was just a little nervous. The whole experience is just kind of an uming. Fairbanks has been a cameraman for 16 years, but today he wasn't operating on experience. It was instinct. And that's what drew him back for one last shot. That's when the tower began to collapse. I was looking in the viewfinder, and I just saw this reverse mushroom cloud billowing down, and I realized my proximity, and immediately just turned and started running north. But for Evan Fairbanks, this is the image that will haunt him and us for the rest of our lives. The image of that plane just coming out of nowhere, coming into the frame and disappearing into the side, into the south side of the tower, as if a floor had been hollowed out, and it was a hangar that it was just landing. We've seen these images in movies, and we know that it's all artificial, and Hollywood makes it. And it's hard to put together that it's real this time. Well, and as we, it was real, as everybody now knows. Another thing I think is very interesting here is how many of the shots obscure the entry site where the plane hits the building. To be sure, there it is. It's almost like a design decision, where maybe they said it's easier to fake the entry. If we don't actually have to create the impression of the plane hitting the building and the interaction between the aluminum, flying it 500 miles per hour, and the concrete and steel building. And I think that's one of the major reasons as we discussed earlier, that the south tower was hit on the opposite side of the north tower. And a lot of the footage, like you're seen on the screen, is looking straight at the north tower's wound. And then you see this big fireball, but not the entry of the plane, which from a CGI perspective seems to be the weakness of this operation. Keep in mind, many of the videos that show the plane hitting the face of the building, where you would expect to see the plane crumple up, parts bouncing off, a major deceleration, etc., etc. Many of these shots did not surface until way later, as in they weren't shown live. This is important to note. So in our attempts to explain how the planes can crash into these buildings in such a nonsensical fashion, it's important to consider the other anomalies that morning. There's other footage that we've talked about in the past and we'll talk again in the future about. That shows evidence of masking. For example, this shot here on the left, you see this weird, opaque, secondary line. It doesn't look right. And on the right, there seem to be a little self-conscious about that line, and if put a black line on top of it, but they slapped a line at that key point on the right side of the building where the plane passes behind. There's also footage that seems like they use layers, showing what seems to me to be an impossible perspective. And that's what I have on the screen here. The foreground and background layers look mismatched, creating impossible perspective changes, where you can line up the background and the foreground changes drastically. Or you see big time movement in the background like this bridge here that doesn't actually make sense, given there's no movement of the camera that would explain it. So check out my playlist on timtruth.com, click Playlists, and then 9-11 documentaries. There's also the very bizarre way that these buildings fell, which to many independent researchers screams controlled demolition, as in there were explosive charges placed on the structural support of the buildings, causing them to fall at near free fall speed into their own footprints. Also in the rubble, there's numerous reports of molten metal. So in my analysis, they had to have an impact in a big explosion at the top. The planes couldn't crumple up on the outside. They couldn't miss. The explosions had to serve as a believable enough excuse for the buildings falling the way that they did. So we see numerous signs of video manipulation. In the appearance of control demolition, calls into question every aspect of the timeline and all the footage that we were handed.