The Flight 007 Conspiracy

Video Transcript:

Many older people eventually come to realize, than getting old is a drag. But there is definitely one benefit of having lived through the history leading up to today's circumstances. What may seem to be an astonishingly rapid decline in the affairs of the world, had its roots decades ago, while the majority of the people were asleep to what was happening to them. To be honest, we were always being shocked and jived. Back and forth financially. While we were trying to do good for our families. Here is an interesting blast from the past, that may help explain what we are seeing today. Like I've right away. Something happened to me. Something happened to me yesterday. He don't know if it's right or wrong. Maybe he should tell someone. He's not sure just what it was, or if it's against the law. There is an elite corps in this country that has dominated American society. Well, their objective is to try to bring about a gradual transition in our society, a dissolving of sovereignty, and a moving steadily to the left on the political spectrum. Before they leave, the elite of groups that I mentioned particularly key individuals and policymakers and accounts on the financial. The interview you're about to watch is a perfect example of what happens when a politician steps out of line. Larry McDonald was a US politician who served as a democratic member of the US House of Representatives from 1975 to 1983. He represented Georgia's 7th congressional district. Despite being a Democrat, McDonald was a conservative and a staunch opponent of communism. On September 1, 1983, Larry McDonald was a board Korean Airlines flight 007. The plane, a civilian Boeing 747, was en route from New York City to Seoul, South Korea, with 269 passengers and crew on board. All passengers and crew including Larry McDonald himself perished in the crash. The circumstances surrounding the downing of Korean Airlines flight 007 are controversial at best. Others call it a false flag attack, but one thing's for sure. This was the last interview he ever gave. Mr. McDonald, I'm not a conspirator. I think even Buchanan would vouch for that. Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert, well, no, I don't think so. Yeah, I remember the Council on Foreign Affairs. You have certainly, let me just say what Newsweek says that says that the John Berser Society considers communism only one arm of a national, of a master conspiracy in which socialist American insiders are plotting to establish world government. Now he also says, and here's director John McManus, that's your public relations director, saying at former Secretary of State Alexander Hague and CIA director William Casey are two of these master conspirators who are plotting to establish world government. Now what do you say? You know that kind of silly ass-and-eye statement is what makes people laugh at the John Berser Society? Well, Tom, I'm sure being a longstanding member of the Rockefeller Apparatech and as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations of Longstanding, you're fully aware that there is an elitist core in this country that has seen value in subsidizing communism or protecting communism. It has? Sure. You're accusing me of subsidizing communism? No, I'm saying that. There's an evidence. There's an elitist. There's an elitist. That is them. Wait a minute. It's amazing how the roles have reversed in just four decades. Here's a Democratic congressman, alerting people to the existence of the new world order. In 1983. There is an elitist core in this country that has dominated American society. I want to be a trial-added commission, a trial-added commission, an outlaw in foreign relations. They're here, sorry, but let's face it, they have dominated the State Department for 40 years. They have dominated the State Department for 40 years? He made that statement 40 years ago. And pretty much openly. Well, what are they trying to do? Well, their objective is to try to bring about a gradual transition in our society, a dissolving of sovereignty and a moving steadily to the left on the political spectrum. Who can deny that the scenario he is describing is actually taking place in 2023? The ones responsible deny their role daily, on the nightly news, and in all major media. Which is owned by this guilty party. Who are they? The elitist groups that I mentioned, particularly key individuals and policy makers and accounts on the monetary fund part of this. Well, I would say the International Monetary Fund has certainly been set up for the purpose of facilitating that transfer of sovereignty and transfer of wealth on the road. We elected Mr. Conchart. We left it to finish the point because otherwise we have a lot of unanswered questions that you are looking at a group that has worked to bring about a dissolution of national subdued on the road to world government. And certainly you are familiar with the local professor Carol Quigley, who has been part of your club, in which he admitted all this. And he said in his book, Tragedy and Hope, the only thing I disagree is that we have worked to keep it a secret. And you see, Officer Leicester, Jr., riding way back in 1947, says, yes, this is the hidden policy of America. But we can't tell the American public because they are too unsophisticated to unsophisticated to understand. Or is it that they might just blow your heads off? With their constitutionally protected firearms? See the value of the transfer of the mentality of world government. What is the instrumentality of the country? What you say about it, I think that. The silliest statement I ever heard. You know, it made anything like that. Well, let me suggest that you read the May, June issue of the partisan review of 1947, Tom. And you can read it for yourself. It's called the message of America. There was a conspiracy. A conspiracy meeting. Oh, he didn't use the word conspiracy. He said the objective of the transfer of sovereignty. Let me finish. I'll tell you. He said that the objective, the secret policy, which we can't tell the American public because they're not sophisticated enough to see the value, is that through a steady result of erosion of new deals, we bring the American society steadily to the left. All right. And through a son concept of the nine containment, we merge into the vital center of the socialist left. And eventually, relieve the American people of those pesky firearms. Before they find out, about all the destruction we've caused. Those words, not mine. I think John Kennedy would remember that. No, let me ask you this. The world federalist movement in the post-war era contained a lot of people who eventually broke with it. And a lot of people thought the UN, in the post-war era, looked toward world government. Indeed they did. Up until 48.9. But a lot of them said, look, we were utopian. That's over and done with. We can't move. And a lot of them came in Kennedy's government. A slessinger was in there when they were fighting in Vietnam, launched the African Vietnam, slessinger was behind the Bay of Biggs. In other words, look, isn't there some move that occurred in the post-war era that now has been dissipated because nobody believes in the utopian ideal of world government anymore? Well, I think there are those that realize that moving straight from a prototype of as the United Nations and the world government perhaps is tactically impossible. But phasing out increasingly a national sovereignty into regional government and phasing out sovereignies into international treaties and multiple areas. The whole area. The whole movement toward quirk interdependent. Yeah. NATO is part of the conspiracy. Well, there are certainly elements in NATO. There are people in NATO who are very strongly dedicated to the defense of the West. But at the same time you find in NATO a steady dissolution, you find a growing weakness. There's a NATO policy dominated by state department policies that has not worked. Well, there's a regional grouping and I think, therefore, it may be suspect by the general British society. We're talking with Congressman Larry McDonald, who has recently been elevated against the chairmanship of the John Birch society succeeding Robert Wells. We'll be back in a minute. Congressman Larry McDonald, a Democrat from Georgia. Mr. McDonald, your predecessor believed that the PTA was too left-wing and that John Birch is idea at one time tried to infiltrate it, though. Oh, that's just ridiculous. Teachers would never do bad things to children or teach them things their parents wouldn't approve of. Not in a million years. What do you take us for? Fools? Or so he said, you're the word you're in. Oh, great. Are you still, is that part of your program now? Well, I think when the PTA comes out in this program for the test band treating and when the PTA comes out for gun control, it comes out for obviously national legislative programs that have been linked with liberaldom, having nothing to do with education of our children, I think many people are wondering what in the world is the PTA doing and that includes members of the John Birch society. Well, I wonder about you. Public. I look you up. You're the biggest joiner that I've ever seen in order to belong as iconodum to 67 organizations among which are the National Ripple Association, the American Pistol and Revolver Association, the Committee for the Right to Keep in Bear Arms, the Second Amendment Foundation and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep in Bear Arms. Well, Tom, I think there's a real drive in this country to try to destroy the realization of our citizens that they have a fundamental constitutional right to keep in bear arms as a constitutional out. Oh, come on. They're not after the guns. And unfortunately, there are those in our society, including elements of the PTA nationally, not always locally by any stretch, but nationally, who would believe that the federal government should restrict the light of citizens to keep in bear arms. Well, you can take the issue of one of the major problems of this country's inflation and the problems of the destruction of the dollar. And the fact of the matter is, in spite of promises of the contrary, Reagan has not moved to correct the deficiencies who are now back to Canterbury. Do you think that's the spike in the comments of the country? You think that's a result of the conspiracy you mentioned. So if somebody working on them to get the inflation so that this country will be weak. Oh, it's a man who campaigned against elitism. It's a man who in his campaign rhetoric said that he would not be having the council on foreign relations, trial-lateral types dominating his candidate. He's got about 250 members of such in his administration. Let me ask you about Bill Tracy. No, I've known Bill. I've known all of the trial-lateral commision. I've known Bill Casey. I've known Bill Casey, the director of CIA, World War II, as a matter of fact, and World War II is my boy. Now, you're a public relations director, the John Virtua Society, says that Bill Casey is a part of this conspiracy. That's right, sir. Bill Casey. Before you became CIA, one of his big jobs was aiding in the transfer of technology and goods and so forth of the Soviet Union, helping the camera river project, the export-inport bank, helping the finance sector. The export-inport bank part of the conspiracy. I think the, I'm trying to figure it out. The fact that the American people had been tapped steadily, especially since World War II, to finance their enemies and to have the massive technology transfer for those who might be hearing all that from the Brayden doctrine in the agency, which you're very familiar with, and the feeling that we must somehow subsidize the quote, non-communist left. That's among our so-called allies. Brayden, which is a country after country, that turned out to be the communist, the Brito-Conus, masquerading. Oh, that's Mr. Mitterrand, who has taken the strongest position against the Russians of any Western European. Oh, he was about to lose everything at the pole when he had to show some sign. It's very difficult to say exactly how far that will lead. No, he's been McDonald. He's not using the term conspiracy. No, I didn't use it. For having safe pet, but you're on work to say to you. I go through the takes. You've used it 45 times. That's right. They say this is a conspiracy. I want to know what the conspiracy is. I'm trying to find out who's in it. You're not listening. Domaz, he's been telling you for 10 minutes who the conspirators are. You haven't been listening. What agency's a government in it? I want to fight it along with you. You look like Tom. Let me tell you, Tom. As a man, I remember the conspiracy. He's a member of the press. Let me ask you. He's used Mr. Vaden's use for the 47th time in the term conspiracy. Now, let me ask you seriously, when you use people like Casey, who is on the council and foreign relations, David Rockefeller's trilateral committee commission, what do you mean, or do you mean, is that your term, the term conspiracy? Well, there are many different levels of the problem. Yes, the term has been used, the term of conspiracy. When you have a group of people, they're working actively collaborating. And the other end of that point of collaboration are communists. And on this end of the point of collaboration, did Bill Casey and trilateralists and see it for a week? You have people who are part of the elitist structure of this country, that have dominated this country openly for 40 years. I know, but they're not as at a conspiracy. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. If people quietly working together for evil objective to a more, that by definition, there's a conspiracy, you have by their own admission. You look at the tragedy and hope by Professor Carol Quigley. He was a member of this elitist group. He said, sure we've been working this. Sure we've been collaborating with communism. Yes, we're working for a global accommodation. Yes, we're working for World Government. The only thing I object to is that we have kept it a secret. And I think we have gone so far along we should come out and say, a bit more. I think Bill Casey doesn't know who Professor Quigley is. I don't. You did Georgetown a number of years ago. I had a couple of years ago and he wrote the tragedy and hope is very noted, member of your club, Tom. Tom, you've got a broad, you're reading. I'm not sure. I don't do. He's read more about conspiracy. And that's why I'm interested in what I'm going to do. What you ought to do is go back and look at your founder, Edward Mandelhouse, because he wrote the Philip Drew administrator. And then, the Colonel House said that what he envisioned for the world was a world government along socialist lines as envisioned by Karl Marx. Now, that's your leader, Tom. So you got to go back to the beginning. Well, yesterday, with Monroe Wilson, do you think he would have come in here? Oh, I think Woodrow Wilson was his follower. I think Edward Mandelhouse dominated Wilson, not the other way around. And so Edward Mandelhouse, I know that was a, we ought to make that clear. He was president Wilson's potential. Perhaps he could go that's correct. Yeah. He is the, he is the real villain from which all these conspiracies, no, no, no, no. He is a manager figure, but there has been, unfortunately, in the West, an element. There are good members in the Council on Foreign Relations, dedicated patriotic people. You've had Spruel Brayden, who is a member of the Council of the Virtus. Bill Buckley's in Council on Foreign Relations. You've got some dedicated people, but the driving forces have very clearly been willing to collaborate, subsidize, work for technology transfer for what they feel. There's some type of accommodation and merger, and I submit this would be a disaster for the American Republic. Are there any encounters? Sure. I disagree with Congressman Donald Z. I do have a conspiracy with you and your friends. I think it's more of a hurting instinct, the direction you've been moving in inertia. I'm curious you further and further, but I do think this. That slogan get the US out of the UN and the UN has, the US looks better and better every day, doesn't it? Maybe they were ahead of their time on that one. No, Pat, I think we've got to have communications with the world in the UN, makes me mad too, but I don't think it's a part of the great conspiracy which extends from Bill Casey and Al Hague all the way to communism. Well, I think that Larry McDonald's a patriot. I think he's wrong about the conspiracy, but he's probably less wrong about what he says about this country than the guy I'm talking to. So what do you think about this? Do you think it's just a coincidence that he was killed when his plane was exploded by a missile attack shortly after this interview? Or is it something else? I want to know what your opinions are. What happened to him? Put it in the comments section below so everybody can know what really happened to him. I want to thank you all for watching this video. And until next time, God bless you all. He don't know just where it's gone. He don't really care at all. No one should just what it was. All the meaning and the thought. Something.