PFIZER Docs They Tried To Hide For 55 Years SHARE URGENTLY

Video Transcript:

Good evening. I'm Melanie Risen with the Western Standard and joining me tonight is Dr. Daniel Nadacy. Someone who doesn't need an introduction at this point. He is an Alberta doctor and a BC doctor who was practicing in Alberta and was barred by the College of Physicians and Surgeons from continuing to practice in Alberta because he treated some patients successfully with Ivermectin in an Alberta hospital while they were going downhill with COVID. Welcome, Daniel. Thanks for joining us again just doing a bit of a follow-up with you and how is everything going? Well, I've been incredibly busy. The first thing I'd like to tell everyone in case they haven't heard yet is that all three patients that I treated in Rimby, Alberta with Ivermectin, they all went back to their home. So even the patient who was in her mid-90s, she went back to her usual nursing home. So that's a three out of three as far as people who've been cured after receiving Ivermectin. That's great news. It's great to hear. So we were going to talk to you today about some information that Pfizer has had to release. They have been mandated to release, I guess, documents or information from their study on the vaccines. And we have some of those results. You have sent me and you want to speak about them today and talk about some of the data and what it reveals and what it says about what's happening with the vaccinations. Absolutely. The report I'm looking at is the cumulative analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports received up to February 28th, 2021. So this is a report issued by Pfizer themselves. So I'll just give a and then we'll post the PDF. So that's the title of the report. So if we look first off to, I'm going to do a screen share here and looking at page six. So this is the Pfizer safety database. And you notice in the first paragraph, they say it is estimated that approximately, and this is a redacted number of doses of BNT 162B2 were shipped worldwide. For emergency supply on December 1st through to February 28th, 2021. So this entire adverse events report is covering a period of three months from December 1st to February 28th. Now the important thing to remember is not everyone in this report got their dose on December 1st because obviously it takes some time for doses to get distributed. So people in this report have had this injection anywhere from one to three months. So I'm going, most of the data I'm discussing will be approximately an average of two months that people have had this injection in their systems. But again, it can vary from three months, like a full three months, to just one or two days, as far as time course of the injection. So let's, I'm just going to scroll down a little bit on the screen share. Now I wonder, can we pull up the JPEG that I put up just with the highlighted numbers? Yes. So I just did some basic math there. And it's to look at how many side effects there were. Right. So the case outcome, so there is a total of 42,086. So that's in the top right corner of the table. 42,086 patients. So the case outcome recovered with sequelae. So sequelae is a long-term effect. 520 people recovered from their adverse event, but with a long-term disability or a long-term condition. Not recovered at the time of the report, 11,361 patients. And that's out of 42,000. So that's 27% of people had not recovered from their adverse event after getting this Pfizer injection. And then 1,223 people died after this injection. So if you add those numbers up, 11,361, 520, and 1,223, that's just over 31%. So 31% of people have either died or had a long-term or permanent side effect from getting this injection. Like this should be front page news, that 31% of people in the first three months that this vaccine has been rolled out and given to people. 31% of people have either died or had a long-lasting side effect from which they haven't recovered or are still in the process of recovering and haven't recovered yet. Now, you have other findings that you were going to share with us as well from this data? Absolutely. This is an incredible report on page 12. So there should be a JPEG file with the highlights I have from page 12 with this report. There it is. So this is looking at situations where pregnant women have received this injection. So out of the 274 cases, only 146 cases were non-serious that had no adverse events. So only 53%, that's 146 out of the 274 pregnant patients who received this injection had no significant adverse events. Oh, could they go on to speak about what the adverse events are? I'm assuming we've been hearing instances of stillbirth or op and miscarriages. This report, it's saying the, so there were miscarriages, the trimester of exposure was reported in only 21 of the cases. So first trimester, they had 15 cases, second trimester, seven, and third trimester, two. So the thing is they have incomplete data as far as when in the pregnancy, these patients received their injections. Okay, but I want to look at the, so that's first, second, third, fourth paragraph of this page where it says, 144 mother cases, 49 were non-serious and 75 were serious. So those 75 out of 274, that's 27%, 27% of pregnant women who received this injection had a serious event. And the serious event includes miscarriages and stillbirths. So that's an incredible danger. And again, this has been known since April 30th. This was published and put out for regulatory authorities to consider since April 30th. So how is it that pregnant women have been getting this injection all summer without being told that there's a 27% chance that they're going to have a serious adverse event during their pregnancy after getting this injection? This is absolutely mind-boggling. Yeah, I know the narrative has been that it is very safe for pregnancy. Clearly, I would think that's a large risk if you're approaching 30% chance of losing the baby by having the shot or having a side effect or an adverse event. Exactly. And then they also go into breastfeeding events. So out of 133 breastfeeding cases, 13% had an adverse event while breastfeeding, which is absolutely stupendous. Why would there be any medication on the market that causes a 13% side effect rate if taken while breastfeeding? Now is it clear that the side effect is with the child, with the baby or with the mother? So it said the 17 cases were all child and infant effects after exposure to the vaccine through breastfeeding. Gotcha. Right, there were the statuses where the mother had problems, problems during breastfeeding, but the 17 cases I'm speaking of are cases where the infant or child exposed to the injection through breast milk. So this is indirect exposure, was having an adverse event. So this idea that the vaccine sheds and is transferred into the breast milk is absolutely true. It's proven by Pfizer's own adverse event data. So moving on. It's incredible that we're looking at this information. I mean, I know that there was a real push to prevent vaccine hesitancy. Do you think that they actually hadn't that much faith in this vaccine that it was truly the sort of the life saver that they were calling it? I mean, it just seems baffling to me that this would have been withheld in an effort to avoid vaccine hesitancy. You know, scientifically speaking, the risks of injecting RNA material into people, the risks of injecting RNA material into a parent who has a developing fetus within them, the risk, the theoretical risks of injecting RNA material into children is extremely high. The scientific risks of doing these types of genetic injections is extremely high. So there is no way a genuine scientist could claim that this is safe, that it is a safe injection. That is a complete unknown. The theoretical risks are extreme. Now, getting into this whole narrative that this is safe and effective, well, we know the efficacy is dismal. Look at the fourth wave in Alberta. Again, that was after 80% of Alberta's population was injected with this. There seems to be next to no protection against variants. The other issue is this idea that something that has never been used before in the human population can be declared as safe. That is an absolute lie. Here's one. Well, and especially considering the fact that Pfizer isn't even out of its child base, that ends in 2023, I believe. Exactly. But even with the initial trial data, it's showing massive amounts of evidence on exactly how unsafe this injection is. And from a general scientific point of view, there is no way to say any new substance that has never existed before in known human history is safe until you have at least a decade of data. What's supposed to happen is if there's a new substance introduced to people and given to people, whether it's a medication or something called a vaccine or some additive into the water or some pesticide that's added to food. When something new is produced to the human species, every single adverse event is automatically due to that new substance until proven otherwise. So that means every heart attack, every stroke, every blood clot in the intestines, every blood clot in the lungs, every issue of cancer, every autoimmune disease. Those are all automatically due to the new substance until there is at least a 10 year track record saying, you know what, the heart attack rate did not change between before the vaccination and after the vaccination. The stroke rate did not change from before the pesticide and after the pesticide was introduced. The rate of autoimmune diseases did not change from before when people got vaccinated till after they got vaccinated. That is proper science. This notion that regulatory authorities, television doctors, politicians have been going around saying that this is safe, is an absolute lie. That is the most unscientific statement anyone could make. And did you have other data that you were, I know you maybe had one more page or have we covered it all that you wanted to? Yeah, there's one more page I took a JPEG of and that's just regarding the children because this is a hot topic right now since this injection was approved in Canada for use on children between five and 11 years of age. So let's look at the Pfizer report on the first three months when 34 children under the age of 12 received this injection. And is that the full number for their children's trial for this? So between January and February, between December 2020 and February 2021, children were not supposed to receive this injection. However, inadvertently a number of children did and they had 34 reports of children receiving this injection. Out of those 34 children who received this injection, 24 had serious side effects. So that's 70.6%. 70.6% of children under the age of 12 had a serious side effect from getting this injection. How is it possible that Health Canada approved this for use in children under the age of 12 with this kind of data and Health Canada has known about this since at least April 30th of this year? And then let's look a little bit further down. 13 out of those 34 kids who had an adverse event from this injection did not get better. 13 were unresolved. So how is it possible that colleges of physicians and surgeons, public health departments, Health Canada are pushing this injection and administering it to children under the age of 12? This is irrefutable evidence from Pfizer themselves that their injection is dangerous. How is this happening? How is this? I know originally when Pfizer was tapped to produce their documentation and their research, they had asked to, I feel like I remember they had asked to have about 55 years to then produce the information but then they were ordered to do so a certain amount each month I believe it was. Is that right? And so this is what we're looking at. We're looking at what's originally been released from Pfizer so far. I mean based on what's been released from Pfizer so far, the information that's known by government since April 30th 2021, this product should have been taken off the market and never brought back again. The evidence of danger in just the first two months of this being out there is extreme. Yeah and so what's the purpose? What's what do you think going on? Why has this not been recalled? Why has this not been taken off? You know I think there's been an incredible amount of corruption in the Canadian government, in provincial governments, in all levels of government. The public health system has been has been usurped and turned into a vehicle for profit, for Pfizer. We have been completely taken over and used our tax dollars used to enrich large pharmaceutical companies. I can't imagine how difficult it must be to be a medical professional and know what you know and have seen what you've seen and be you know still trying to advocate what it is that you are and feeling like you don't really have a voice and you're not reaching people. What would you say to the you know public health officials if you could speak to them today? Well what I would say to public health officials, doctors who are involved in in colleges of physicians and surgeons, doctors who are who are involved with health authorities, why is it that knowing the incredible amount of deadly side effects from this new injection, why have you continued to push its use? Very good question. Anything else you'd like to share on this topic? I think it's incredibly important that that this information gets out there and I give a lot of credit to the group of physicians who did the freedom of information request that allowed me to get a copy of this this report that I was able to discuss with you. So I mean this product should not be on the market. It should not have been on the market as of April 30th and the fact that our government has signed away immunity from liability for such a dangerous and deadly product, it's criminal. Well Dr. Nagasi we thank you for sharing your insights on this information and the documents that have been released so far from Pfizer and more are to come. So we will stay in touch and we hope to see change. We hope to see that this information is affecting decisions that are coming down within the coming weeks and months. Thanks for joining us today. Thank you for your time. That was Dr. Nagasi joining me again just filling us in on some of the documents that were released from Pfizer based on a on a FOIP request, a freedom of information request from public health and medical professionals for transparency. We have the website for you if you'd like to see more of the documents they are posted on their website and we've got the link for you on ours as well. Thanks for joining us.