When Astronauts Rise From The Dead

Video Transcript:

Truth has nothing to do with the number of people who are convinced of it. If you are 40 years old, you may remember January 28, 1986. It was the day of a huge NASA catastrophe off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, where at 11.38 am EST, 73 seconds after takeoff, Space Shuttle Challenger exploded in the tremendous burst over the Atlantic. All seven crew members were killed, five NASA astronauts and the two payload specialists. Millions of Americans, 17% of the total population were watching the launch live on TV, due to payload specialist Christa McGollough, the first teacher in space. The media coverage of the explosion was extensive. The study reveals that 85% of the Americans questioned had heard of the accident within the hour. The whole world was in a state of shock and the whole world mourned and took part in the funerals of the Space Shuttle victims. The failure of an o-ring gasket of the right-hand side, solid fuel booster, was the cause of the explosion. The shuttle did not dispose of an ejector seat system and the impact on the ocean surface was too severe for anyone to survive. The catastrophe led to a 32-month pause in the NASA shuttle program and by appointment of President Ronald Reagan, the Rogers Commission was created a special committee to investigate the accident. These are the names of the seven crew members of the Challenger. First, Francis Richard Scobie, commander. Second, Michael John Smith Pilot. Third, Ronald McNair, mission specialist. Fourth, Alison Onezuka, mission specialist. Fifth, Judith Resnick, mission specialist. Six, Gregory Jarvis, payload specialist. Seventh, Krista McGonath, payload specialist. And now, the unbelievable. A well-known proverb says, if something looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and behaves like a duck, then it probably is a duck. For a second time, this matter leaves the world breathless. Though this latest chalk even surpasses the one 30 years ago. At least six of the seven Challenger crew members are supposed to be alive still. Four of them, even with the same name. Here is the evidence to review. First, Francis Richard Scobie, commander of the Space Shuttle Challenger. Francis Richard Scobie, born May 19, 1939, commander of the Space Shuttle Challenger. Exactly 30 years after the Challenger crashed, he was spotted as a CEO of Causen Trees, which was, and today still is, a marketing advertising agent, Shinjikago. When you take a look at these two pictures, you can see at least three features that show a strong resemblance. First, the same high forehead and the same eyebrows, and also the eyes, facing slightly downwards at their outer corners. And all this always with his middle name Richard and the same age. You can find the picture on the right side also on his LinkedIn page. When visiting the Causen Trees website, which I've opened here, you come across an animation with a rocket-driven cow. And the deaths world around forms the number six. The whole thing reminds strongly the Space Shuttle Challenger on TV when it exploded in midair. Just how black would such a humor be? Second, Michael J. Smith, pilot of the Challenger. Born on the 13th of April in 1945, pilot of the Challenger. Michael J. Smith, 41 years old when he lost his life 30 years ago because of the explosion. The man on the picture to the right also bears the name Michael J. Smith, and he's exactly 30 years older now. The resemblance with the astronaut Michael J. Smith is striking. The same horizontal eyebrows, the same gray blue eyes, the same vertical indentation on the tip of his nose. We are talking of an emeritus professor for industry and system engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Michael J. Smith, email addresses mjSmith at k.wisk.edu. Third, Ronald McNair, mission specialist of the Challenger. Born on October 21st, 1950, Ronald McNair was the second Afro-American astronaut with a doctor's degree in physics. The 66-year-old Carl McNair on the right looks just as Ronald would look today. One day this fact attracted the attention of some American citizens. When addressing him about astonishing resemblance, it is said that he responded spontaneously that he was the twin brother of the killed astronaut. As a resemblance was more than striking in every aspect, some fellow citizens began to doubt this assertion, because they didn't just want to put out empty alligations, they began to investigate. Previously, it was not known that the late Ronald McNair had a twin brother. However, there was a lot to discover about Carl McNair. For example, that he is an author, an educational consultant, and an inspired speaker. That he is the founder and retired president of the Ronald E McNair Foundation, which he had established in honor of his deceased brother. One detail, however, could not be clarified at the time of that investigation. There are no indications for a twin brother of Ronald McNair named Carl from before 1986. Here's the report of the research of a free journalist. On ancestry.com, I have performed a search for a Carl McNair, who claims to be the brother of the astronaut Ronald McNair. Carl S. McNair's linked in page mentions December 16th as his birthday. On Wikipedia, Ronald McNair's parents are Carl C. and Pearl M. McNair. So I searched AndersonStue.com for any birth or baptism records for a Carl McNair, born on December 16th, whose father is Carl McNair and Pearl McNair his mother. Search results in the birth certificates of Texas between 1903 and 1932. There's only the record of Herschel John McNair born on October 12th in Roosevelt, Absher, whose father's name was William McNair and his mother's was Pearl McNair. In other words, according to ancestry.com, there's no Carl McNair, rather of Ronald McNair. Here's the screenshot of the respective page of ancestry.com, with a timestamp in the lower right hand corner. 10.18 am on 5th of September 2015, circled in red. Just to make sure I redid the search for Carl McNair. This time I have limited the search to Carl McNair, with a father named McNair and a mother called Pearl. I found no Carl McNair, whose father's last name was McNair and whose mother's first name was Pearl. 4th, Ellison Oni-Zuka, Mission Specialist of the Challenger. Another mission specialist of the Challenger, Ellison Oni-Zuka, was the first Japanese American astronaut. He too was supposed to have shown up in public after the Challenger catastrophe. When asked how unearth he could still be alive, he supposedly defended himself pretending to be Claude, the twin brother of the deceased astronaut Ellison Oni-Zuka. As his assertion was not seen to be credible, some fellow citizens set out for a research about a twin brother of the astronaut. The astronaut Ellison Oni-Zuka was born in Hawaii on the 24th of June. At the time of that research, there was no birth register containing a twin brother Claude. Claude allegedly claimed to be the younger brother of Ellison Oni-Zuka. If Ellison were still alive today, he would look exactly like his younger brother Claude on this picture. The same eyebrows, same eyes, same crowd's feet wrinkles, same nose, even the same hair parting. Claude Oni-Zuka is a board member of the Department of Likker Control, County of Hawaii, Helo Hawaii. Resulting from another more extensive research by an eyewitness. I also asked ancestry.com to search for the birth records of Claude Oni-Zuka, the alleged brother of the astronaut Ellison Oni-Zuka. According to Wikipedia's entry on Ellison Oni-Zuka, his father was the late lamented Mazamitsu Oni-Zuka. His mother is Mitsu Oni-Zuka. Result of the search, your search for Claude Oni-Zuka returned zero good matches. Here's the screenshot of the birth register. Just to be sure, I read it, the search for Claude Oni-Zuka, this time without specifying the names of the parents. There were 36 results, none of which was Claude Oni-Zuka. In other words, according to ancestry.com at the time of this research, no one named Claude Oni-Zuka had ever been born in the United States. Fifth Judith Resnick, Mission Specialist of the Challenger. Judith Arlene Resnick, born on April 5, 1949. What of importance can be said about her? With a PhD in electrical engineering, she was a mission specialist of the Challenger. She was the second female American astronaut and the first Jewish American astronaut to fly in space. And now comes the interesting part. At Yale Law School, there is a chair held by a professor named Judith Resnick. The same name, this may occasionally happen, however. Not only is it remarkable that now she is exactly 30 years older than the astronaut Judith Resnick when she was killed. She has exactly the same name, the same appearance, and the same voice as the deceased astronaut. And what is she doing at the Yale Law School? She is a professor of law for the author Lehman program. Now, let's return to compare the pictures. Like the astronaut Judith Resnick, this professor has dark curly hair, dark eyes, the same shaped eyebrow, and the same lines on both sides of the face extending up from the jaw. What else can we see? The mouth, the way they look, and the gestures are exactly the same. Here is another picture to compare. Look here at our mouth, the upper lip of both Judith Resnick's form a slight peak when they speak. Do you see this? And is all this at random or coincidental? Here and after, two elaborate investigations are presented about Judith Resnick as witness report. Whoever compares the voices of astronaut Judith Resnick 30 years ago, along with professor Judith Resnick, comes to the conclusion it's about one and the same woman. So let's finally listen to this voice comparison. Judith Resnick before and after 30 years. Well, I too am glad to be here one more time. And I am hoping that the affliction that Steve Hawley had from the 41D Mission Specialist of the Delays hasn't rubbed off on me. There were fewer than 40 federal judges around the United States and they didn't need a building of their own. They were tucked into facilities like this. And of course what the US government did was this was a form of tax and marine hospitals. I think the guys behind me are hoping that it has an also otherwise they might from the course is the Civil War and with the Civil War and the North conquest of the South. Otherwise they might throw me off the flight. US federal government owned it. And I will now introduce that 50 building. It's around the entire hoping that it has a United States. And you all have not heard it so late. Are all these inconsistencies pure coincidences or is it about a worldwide deception of enormous proportions? One must not mistake the majority for the truth. Six Sharon Christa McOllth, payload specialist of the Challenger. On September 2, 1948, Sharon Christa McOllth was born. She too was one of the astronauts killed on the Challenger. She was a teacher for social studies at Concord High School in New Hampshire, where she was selected from more than 11,000 applicants to participate in the NASA project Teacher in Space. If the Challenger had not exploded, she would have been the first teacher in outer space. Had she not died in the Challenger disaster, McOllth would be 68 years old today. In the course of the research about the Space Shuttle Deception, also for Sharon McOllth, apparently an exact double was found with the same looks and believe it or not with the same name. Even considering the 30 added years, this exceptional professor of law at Syracuse University looks exactly the same as the astronaut McOllth. But not only does she look identical, but she is also exactly the same age. Note all the details, for example how her hair growth, extends from the center of her hairline to the left of her forehead. The same lawyer Sharon McOllth, who works for Syracuse Law School in New York State, is also a cousin of Virginia's governor, Terry McOllth. And he in turn had supported the re-election of Clinton and the election of his wife Hilary as her campaign chairman. Furthermore, he stood up for the support of NASA, in particular for the matter of the rocket launching site on Wallops Island, Virginia, in the Atlantic Ocean. In all these researches, it is important to state that it would be one thing, if a single crew member of the Challenger would resemble to a person still alive. That could be dismissed as a mere coincidence. But it is quite a different thing, if six members of from one at the same Challenger crew have a look alike, living in one at the same country and in not less than four cases even have the same name. The rough guess of a physics teacher is summarizing this probability with the following figures and illustrations. By using a binomial distribution, one can assert on how likely it is that in an event with this probability occurs four times within ten years. Roughly guess this leads to a probability of about ten raised to the power of minus 160. For comparison, the probability of being hit from space debris is indicated by computing experts with the probability of about six times ten raised to the power of minus 13. So it is more likely to be hit by some comet fragments seven times in your life than such a collection of local likes would come about. But probably this figure is even much higher. What kind of people would the NASA be composed of if they are able to lie deliberately and to bluff a whole world for more than thirty years? After all the NASA is an institution which is devouring multi-digit billion dollar amounts of tax money and private donations every year. What does it mean if not less than four elite universities would be involved only in the worldwide space shuttle front? The following questions must be absolutely clarified. Who else could be involved into this fraud considering all the astronauts presumed dead would then be found as lawyers, jurists, financial experts etc. So if the entire NASA astronauts and professors of law, in other words elite instructors of teachers etc. would be involved in a global fraud who else in addition to that? Where is the seventh astronaut, Gregory Jarvis? Is he still alive? For the clarification of all these endless questions humanity depends upon its own help. Whoever is capable to help is welcome to participate in the clarification of all the problems addressed in this film. According to eyewitness reports from NASA insiders the NASA did not only lie in some ways but in every way. A NASA insider reveals. When I was talking with the gentleman from Belcom and we were discussing the lie everything he was telling me was different from what we were being told was the truth. And at one point I asked him I said many you guys you lied about a lot didn't you? And instantly he said no. We didn't lie about certain things we lied about everything. None of it was true. Repeatedly in their advertisement films, NASA boasted that their space flights created jobs, first of all in the industry. But now the most urgent question is this, which jobs in exactly which industry? At least in the space flight industry various NASA astronauts were not taking an active part during the great moon or space shuttle flights. So a NASA insider recently claimed that he cannot take part anymore for his conscience sake in the whole worldwide deception as he calls it. He says that the NASA does not lie to the world only in some aspects but in every single aspect. Because of similar testimonies of other NASA insiders freelance journalists took a kind of a crucial test. With a Bible in their hand they placed themselves in front of all these famous hyped astronauts and let them swear on the Bible that they really had been on the moon and had not been lying to the world. But listen and watch for yourself. And like this all astronauts reacted when being asked. You want me to knock you in the head? Well I want you to swear to God on the Bible that you walked on the moon. If you walked on the moon we're giving the opportunity to swear to God that you walked on the moon. I'm going to give you the opportunity to get the hell knocked out if you don't leave it alone. So why don't you just put the end to the record and the argument and put your hand on the Bible. So where to God you walked on the moon? Mr. Seder, I don't know in you that's probably a fake Bible. You're the one who said you walked on the moon when you didn't. Calling the kettle black if ever thought of saying I'm misrepercuted. My way from me you're coward and a liar and a thief. You're coward and a liar. You're coward and a liar. We are talking to the wrong guy. Why don't we talk to the administrator in NASA? We're passengers. We're guys going on a flight. I don't hit people but you're going to be able to deck unless you get a bet. I'm dead now. I'm going to say it. Get the hell out of here. Well I hate your stuff and get the fuck out. Why don't you quote me and say it's bullshit. I'm going to shout those interonkling. I don't give a damn about all that shit. I'm a leaner orbit being falsified. Being falsified? Correct. We've got an unedited tape from a source at the Johnson Space Center. Totally nonsense. Mr. Cyber, you do not deserve answers. If you show this publicly, you're open for a lawsuit. Okay? All these reactions also endorse this suspicion that there seems to be something really fishy in the world. What are the objectives pursued? Were they only on vacation at the expense of taxpayers and investors? Probably not. But which are the imaginings? All these people are realizing during their world-famous moon and space flight when they are not on board of a rocket. Therefore, the world public would have to ask the following questions. How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there? How many people are there?