Graphene Oxide CONFIRMED In All The Four Main Covid Vaccines

Video Transcript:

simple, or simplicism, this one happens to be a identification of a carbon with the of course oxygen and nitrogen and based upon the values of the testing it is identical to those of graphene oxide. Oh wow. Okay so I'm just gonna break down I'm just gonna break down this interview here because they cover quite a few topics and might get well some people have said in the comments section that someone needs to break it down into you know categories chapters so that's what I'm gonna do. This bit here talking about graphene oxide because that is the subject we've been investigating and looking into and that's what he's discovered also is in four of the vials. So here's here's our picture and here's the standard comparison. Here is our picture and here's the standard that I'm comparing to. So these pictures are shown are aqueous fractions containing reduced anatomically morphologically as we look at this from the Pfizer vaccine. What I've been all of the vials we actually checked. Did they need to get up? Don't worry. Yeah what a spot you found and you leave it get. Yeah? You just relax. Let's see you later then. Yeah here it is. This is the liposome caps that containing the reduced group graphene oxide. The Pfizer uses this is incredible just see this thing that we've been you know speaking about the viral talking about this liposome this capsid and here it is. Wow. Yeah that's what it looks like. Yeah. So there are other particulates these are new you haven't seen. No. They're kind of stacking on top of each other. So it's a multi-leg layer here again, a simpleaster, a glumination, lighter colors are unfolded, monolayers. Okay. So you've got a single sheet of graphene oxide on top of another single sheet of graphene oxide. Oh they're making an noise today. There's one milking. Here you come here, Calon. Give me some free milk please. Yeah same with one pound fifty and he's four points. Thank you. Okay. We'll just go over there. Yeah. That's what I need a quad bike. My mask got warm. Want to know? So this is graphene oxide that we're looking at them. Yeah. Right here. And so I'll get to how we know that. Okay. Here in a second. Okay. And here's another magnification of this. Okay. Of the mesh of the graphene oxide. So this is sort of zoomed in a lot more, right? It's 500 nanometers, one nanometer, a one micrometer is that it? And then 200 nanometers. Yeah, 500. This is, I think we're missing a couple of those. That's I think it's under 200. But anyway, okay. You can see, you can see the construct then of the graphene oxide. So how do we identify the actual morphologically? How do we identify the actual particulates then within those? So using a testing energy, dispersive x-rays across could be reveals that of course the context of these lipid is these liposomes in the Pfizer vaccine. And of course here we see we see the carbon, we see the nitrogen in the oxygen, which here again is quantifying the actual presence of graphene oxide. The reason we're showing sodium and chloride is because it's in a saline solution of 0.9%. Okay, so that's why this picked up. Okay. Okay, so this is the contents that of these liposomes, these fatty lipid capsids. This is what's this is what's in those capsids. Oh, I see. So that's how you find out. So you see the capsids, you know, optical, you can see them with your eyes literally through the back. We can see it here, but then we then measure what's inside there. Through the spectrometry readings. Yeah. And here we have to use something that goes into the actual energy. So not scanning, but transmission. So the electrons are picking up these specific elements within those liposomes and then we know exactly what's in that capsid. You got it? Yes, wow. This is major. So this is this is the identification of the actual elements in the capsid then. Yes. And this is the else we would know. So, and this is definitely on disclosures. Yes, in the Pfizer, the contents of the liposomes is 100% graphene oxide. It's you again. This little white duck, all the ducks on here, they're all more coloured mullards and this little white duck, my mate hadn't in his back garden. He thought we got to introduce some white ducks down here. See the all that colour. So we delivered him. He's a lonely little duck, because he's white. And all the other's are funny colours. They don't know what to make of him. He's always on his own. See you mate. Let me smell eggs for later. Thanks. Hello everyone. Good morning and welcome. This is Rolody from Rolody Reports. And I'm here again this morning with Dr. Robert Young and he has a breaking story to reveal. This is very, very important information. It's going to be of world changing significance, truly. And Dr. Robert Young has been doing some major research in this area. He's just published a report at his website and he's here this morning to discuss his findings and the entire report. Dr. Robert Young, as you know, is a very well-known clinical and research scientist. His areas of study are molecular biology, medical microbiology, clinical nutrition and naturopathy. And he can correct me this fine duck, young, perhaps this is the moment to just throw the floor open to you. To ask you perhaps to see a few words about your background in research in this area, how long you've been at it, et cetera. And can you confirm for us also before we start discussing your report that these are your own findings. This is your own research that you are presenting. Great. Well, it's good to see you. Thank you for that great generous introduction. And it said that time flies when you're having fun. And as I look back on my 40-year plus career, in medical biology, microbiology and in the work I've done in microscopy, using all types of techniques from face contrast to bright field to dark field to, you know, transmission to scanning electron microscopy, all these different modalities to identification of colloidal particulates, nanoparticulates. This is a field that I've been interested in many, many years. Part of my background in education and training was in Germany. And with Dr. Marie Blecker at the Enderlin Institute and that really formed a lot of the basis and direction of my career. And her work was based upon the work of Gunther Enderlin. And Gunther Enderlin, a German scientist who really followed the work of another great scientist and medical doctor in 20-shown. And there's people in between there, you know, from Royal Rive to Dr. Livingston-Wieler, Du Gaston Desons, the great Canadian biologist who did a lot of work in face contrast microscopy. So not only have I done research in this area, but I also taught it at the university level. And I've published several articles, various peer reviewed journals. So I've been very active in not only the research, but also in the development of nutraceuticals that have been used now for over four decades, beginning back in the 80s to really help people deal with this. So nanotechnology and colloidal systems and the development to be used in biologicals for nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals is a growing area, you know, using scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy and the identification to determine particulates that I'll be describing in the various modalities. Is work that's going around the world and we each share and compare. And there are some standard micrographs that people use of mine and we use of theirs in order to validate what we're seeing under the microscope. And over turn, of course, Peter Duceford, who I respect highly wrote a book called Inventing the AIDS Virus. But he also wrote a book inside the book called Inventing the Ebola virus. And then he also wrote a book within the book called Inventing the Hepatitis Virus. And this is what we were talking about earlier. Yeah, the disease virus actually don't exist. So now we have over 75 letters from various institutions, governments and universities and asking them a very specific question. Have you identified and for the CDC, this question was was asked and I have copies of these of these letters was asked by Christine Massive from Canada. And but these questions have been asked and others got on board to continue to ask, even the state of California has now been asked for them to come forth and show us the identification isolation and the morphology of the coronavirus. And of course, no one can produce anything. No, they can't. I've also asked the state of Massachusetts. Vanilla from any hospital, from any university, from every government entity can give us a report on that report on this and show us the evidence or send us a testing sample, you know, to compare to of each other. There's not a single paper on the subject. Nobody is isolated at anywhere around the world using coaxed postulates as you pointed out in our last conversation, Dr. Young. Well, cauches and also rippers, which was in, which was later than cauches. So I mean, there is the gold standard for identifying germs, i.e. whatever you want to call them based on their size. Because a lot of people don't know this. Prior to the 60s, viruses were called filterable bacteria. Did you know that? No, I didn't know that. Okay. And they later became called viruses and coined that. Of course, in Latin, virus means poison. Corota means radiation. So if you put the two words together, what you have is radiation poisoning, which, which just on the news last night, they were talking about 200 people that were affected by a syndrome, which has unknown pathology, even though I described this in another article, the pathology of the Havana syndrome, which has been going on for five to six decades, is bombarding using direct energy weapons. People all over the world, really. It's interesting if it's reported in Vietnam. This was in Vietnam that claimed that they were affected by radiation poisoning called the Havana effects syndrome. And here again, this pulsating radiation, which is not well understood other than the fact that if you own a microwave, you can understand that you would never put your head into a microwave. And surely, surely you're holding your head to a phone, but it's putting out at least 2.4 gigahertz, which is the same radiation or frequency microwave field is being put out by your home microwave oven. You're holding up to your head, or you're exposing yourself in your home. And you wonder why you've got lightheadedness or dizziness or muddled thing, or forgetfulness or high fever, you're having night sweats, or your menstrual cycles are off. And of course, I wrote an article on this that was published Integrative Molecular Biology, Causes of Oxygen Deprivation, which is one of the symptoms of SARS. You know, I take great risks by even talking about this in public way. Yes. So it's, and I believe, I believe, I believe, I believe, and Matt, he needs to know what is in that serum, that vial, that solution, that aquia solution, and what does contain there in? Absolutely. And you're again, you can determine for yourself whether or not, being your choice, once you have this knowledge, you can then decide whether you want to be inoculated or not. That's your choice. And whether you believe in, which I don't, just so you know this, I do not believe in the viral theory. In fact, I've written articles on dismantling it. I actually spoke at the International Conference on Bibers' and Vaccinations in Natalie Rome, but also in Dubai, presenting this material to various scientists and doctors and researchers around the world. And you know, this is not to expose, you know, something diabolical, it's to educate and understand, you know, what this, and of course, they're hiding behind government to laws and they're hiding, those who are producing these vaccines are hiding behind an emergency authorization. Authorization, use that without disclosing the ingredients. And this is unheard of. It's never happened in the history of the world. So you have a right, I believe, a human right to know what is going inside your body. And then you can decide whether you want to have that concoction injected. But the symptoms of corona are real. The virus is not real. So there is some disease, but it's not a virus. The real. The question is, what is causing it? Right. And there is there a corona effect? Are there spike proteins? Yes. There are spike proteins, but spike proteins are indodged. They're not, I mean, yes, you can take spike proteins or a particular from a human or animal source and then choose those or encapsulate those in to these light. And then let's say direct those in to provide some sort of reaction, which is the current immunity idea is that you put a little bit of whatever the toxin is or the particular to build up some form of immunity. And this is nonsense. It's literally scientific nonsense because it's found with the lymphocytes or antibodies. It's found in managing and maintaining the alkaline design of the fluids of the body. So when we look at the effects, which are germs, these are biological transformations or breakdown products due to the actual causative effects. And those are environmental. Now, so they can come from water, they can come from food, they can come from air, they can come from, you know, inoculating these noxious substances into your passive fluidity to the interstitian. So what I wanted to share with you was some of the published research that was done, the work was actually done in 2019, published in 2020 and also 2021. And it was published in this, I don't know if you can see this or not. So what causes oxygen deprivation and blood and of course, it started in of SARS. SARS is an acronym that stands for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Anything that's a syndrome is suggesting that it's an unknown pathology. So they don't know what's really causing it. But here in this article, I described the pathology of SARS and COVID or the coronavirus 2002, 2012 and then 2019. All this all this business of Corona is dates back, you know, 50, 60 years back to the 60s and the actual effect which you see behind it. Which I call the Corona effect. Corona effect is the deterioration of the cell membrane, which gives rise to despite proteins. So I want people to understand this very well. I'm using a scientific testing method, which is called phased contrast microscopy, which diffuses light as you're looking under a microscope. Okay. And the magnification here is thousands of times. Okay. But under the eye pieces, it's about a thousand times. If I magnify that, I don't, you know, I, you can see this then of course, something like a red blood cell, which is approximately seven microns and a micron is 125,000, seven inch. You can actually see these tiny red blood cells. And you can then magnify them, even higher magnifications using digital technology. And then take pictures of them on your computer. And we do that with with Tam and also with Sam, so scanning electron micro, microscope, particularly Tam, which is transmission, which works like bright growth. But this is called phased contrast microscopy. And here you see the spiking of the red blood cells. Now, I don't know what's coming to your mind. Maybe, maybe you're thinking, what is a normal blood lip? That's right. I think the way people would ask them. Okay. So you have to have comparisons. Okay. These comparisons are my comparisons. Okay. But if they're not my my comparisons, then I'm going to reference that as a comparison and note that I'm comparing for anatomical identification. So scientists share information with each other in order to validate anatomically, morphologically, what they're looking at. So healthy round blend cells, under phased contrast microscopy, or even in color, even in shape and even in size. Okay. So here we see lower magnification. Okay. Here versus the one behind me, which is higher magnification. We're actually looking at white centers. You see those white centers? Yes. Are they really white centers? Yeah, they're white centers. They're actually holes. Okay. They're the traditional hematologist, which is asked that the centers are concave. That's where you get a shadowing effect. But these cells are called coticides. Coticides are cells that have holes in them. So you can actually look right through them. And so that's not the case with healthy cells. Healthy cells aren't concave. They're hydrated. And therefore they don't show this differentiation in color from the edge where you see darker on the membrane and lighter on the core. These are all even in color, even in shape and even in size. That's significant because if the cells are concave, that tells me the cell is dehydrated. If there's a hole in it, then that cell is lost its hemoglobin. It's lost its hemoglobin, which is one of the symptoms of COVID, not because of the virus, but by other contributing factors. This is a function. Now one thing I'm going to say here, which 99.9% of the world's population doesn't even know, is that hemoglobin is what provides immunity to the body. Not the white blood cells, the microfudge cells. No, the white blood cells are sanitation engineers. They go around and pick things up, sweep things up. They'll even have some solutions. They're called Ross, reactive oxygen species, which they secrete, which are reduced hydrogen and reduced oxygen. I don't know how deep you want to get into this. I mean, I can go very deep, but I'm trying to keep it simple. What I'm trying to share with you is that people on the surface will take whatever is being said because they don't understand the biology of what I'm talking about. They don't do the testing, so they have to trust. Yes, and you know Dr. Young, I think part of the issue over here is that the world of biology, microbiology, molecular biology, and immunology is being presented to the lay person as so complex and so intricate that we are being given no other option, but to trust that these are experts. They've studied this under microscopes for years. They know what they're talking about. They don't know what they're talking about. They're storytellers. Because the virus theory is just a theory. It has never been proven. Never. Not by anyone. That is here. Many, many, many years ago, because I saw what's happening to a lot of people in the 80s and 90s, I offered a $1 million reward, and then I up to the $5 million for anyone that could identify, isolate, purify, and isolate the HIV virus. It's never been done. The Lutinian Pinar received the Nobel Prize for his discovery for HIV. And yet he was disfellowship at the University of Paris and put out the pasture ended up in China. We met up in Milan, Italy, in 2011, and I asked him what happened. He says, well, you know, I changed some of my opinions. I don't just like Duceberg, HIV does not cause AIDS. That's never been done with HIV. That's why I call it monkey business. Because they were doing the testing on monkeys. They could never recreate AIDS by injecting their so-called HIV samples. Or their so-called isolations into those monkeys. And yet they projected huge propaganda around the world that you know it's actually being transmitted through bodily problems. Well, the same person that started the propaganda at HIV is the same person that started the propaganda on the coronavirus. They're the same person. Who is that person? I'll need we ask. Well, you just have to go back to history and who is the the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease? Who is it now? It's the same person. It's the same person. It's the same person. It's the same life that's been propagated. Perfectly, you know, okay, I think to mention his name Dr. Fauci, you know, he was present there and he's present here as well. And one has to wonder, of course, you know, behind one person is always a whole network, right? Well, the narrative has been going on for a very long time and here again, it's to the benefit of who? To the people? I don't think so. To the group of very sour hungry elites. Yeah, so here again, I don't I don't discount the fact that there's a corona effect. I discount the fact that there's actually a virus, a specific isolated virus that's actually causing these specific diseases. And I've said this and I've said this now for four decades. And I've been on this for over 40 years. Germs do not cause disease. Germs are the symptoms of cellular breakdown due to a diseased environment, which has many contributing factors, i.e. food pollution, water pollution, air pollution, inoculation or drug pollution, you know, lifestyle pollution, including what you think, what you feel and what you believe. These are the contributing factors, the pollute the vascular, then the interstitial fluids, which are either eliminated through the pores of the skin or through urination or defecation or respiration, or then accumulate into the connective tissues, i.e. the muscle or the fat, causing irritation, inflammation, in duration, ulceration, and degeneration, which brings me back to my first publication in the 80s, which was called one sickness, one disease, and one treatment. Dr. Galena McGowco and I published in 2015, and then we announced because we already knew what the cause of cancer was, and we shared that because we were working with the University of Southern California, and we were ready to publish, in peer-reviewed articles, the cure for cancer, and it was stopped. It took me, after going into the amount of persecution, it took me up until 2019 in London, where I actually presented to the scientific community, this information, this life-saving information, but we actually published it in a peer-reviewed article in 2015. Just if you wanted to share with the world, what exactly did you find? What did you find as you looked through the vaccines in those vials? I think you looked at Pfizer, Madonna. Yeah, I'm just looking for the article right now, and it will go 70-80% of the time to the testicles, the gonads, or to the ovaries. Oh, wow. So when I'm looking at the abstract, there were four major pharmaceutical companies, now that we've set the foundation. And it's from those monkey kidney cells again. Type 26 expression expressing the SARS spike protein. Well, any concoction like this, whether it's added or not, will present spike protein. In other words, if you put a poison from a rattlesnake, venom, into your body, I will guarantee you that we will see the development of spike proteins. And that will not provide any immunity whatsoever. No, very strange. All you've proved by denoculation is that hopefully, if you take it, that the poisons and chemicals in it don't kill you, and therefore the experiment is here again to those unfortunate few. In fact, it's not the few. It's now the many. It's not the many that have had injuries, which is a half a billion people in the world right now. And potentially 35 million deaths, which is climbing. Depending on here again, the interaction that I'm going to explain and how this can activate into what many are calling a bio weapon. But so the ingredients here, a purpose of the research article is to identify those specific major minor ingredients contained within these four vaccines manufactured by these four companies. I also mentioned here that it's a human right governed under the world law by the Newenburg Code that the vaccine specific ingredients information is critical. Required and necessary to know so that any human from any country in the world can make it in form decision whether or not, which is a human right, not bestowed by on any man, woman, institution, you know, or government to consent whether to take this denoculation or not. Exactly. People should know what they're putting in their bodies. And exactly what's going on right because there's undisclosed ingredients and that's what Karen Kingston was able to whistle blow about that there's there's redactions and those EUAs actually conceal the entire process and can see what's in the lipid nanoparticles and how they're being infused, etc. And that's the graphinox cycling. Yeah, the method and techniques for these particular were used. Some are all of them. Optical microscopy, which includes bright field, face contrast, dark field, ultraviolet absorption and fluorescent spectrometry, scanning electron, sem, electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, energy distribution or dispersion microscopy, x-ray diffractometer, nuclear magnetic resonance instruments were used to verify the vaccines morphologies and contents. For the high technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all controls were activated and reference measurements adopted. By those who are doing similar types of research, maybe for other types of particulates like titanium oxide or aluminum or titanium dioxide or aluminum oxide. And you can get research on this. These are all toxic nanoparticulates that are harmful to the body. In using live and face contrast microscopy, I just show you a picture. I'm showing you a picture behind me now of the corona effect and the cell membrane deterioration and the creation of the spike proteins under face contrast. I took the picture. This is the face contrast. These are pictures that I've accumulated in a whole library of pictures that I've taken over 40 years of work. This one, of course, most recently, from an inoculated client looking at their blood and the effects on that who was injured and this is what's happened to the blood. So in figure one, you actually see the crystallization of a carbon of a carbon particularly in aggregation. This is what the body does. The body, if it can't get rid of it, it will crystallize it. It'll accumulate it'll try to buffer it and it uses compounds, it uses elements like sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, calcium and it'll use by carbonate compounds that are produced by the stomach. It'll use saturated or low-density liqueur proteins, use polyunsaturated proteins or polyunsaturated fats that are unsaturated with hydrogen. It'll use that. You'll see increases in these types of numbers in forming crystalline or crystal type aggregates like this. I call them simplacism. This one happens to be a identification of a carbon with, of course, oxygen and nitrogen and based upon the values of the testing, it is identical to those of graphene oxide. Oh wow. And it could also come from aerosols, right? The same as chemical. It can come from, it can come from aerosols that can be distributed in many different creative ways. Really frightful that this is what happens because once it goes into the blood and dust, I mean, what chances are there of getting it out safely? So to answer the question about the non-disclosed ingredients contained in the COVID-19, so-called Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccines, the answer is this that we viewed them separately under phase contrast at various magnifications, 10, 600 up to 1500 and even beyond that. Showing anatomical evidence of reduced graphene oxide particulates were compared to micrographs based on others who have been identifying this and Cochare had all 2009 for the identification of verification. So that's anatomical identification based upon other work from other people. So this is the crux of a very major discovery. And at you too, have then identified graphene oxide in all of these four vaccines that you mentioned, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and the Janssen, Janssen. The Janssen. Yeah, and this is the steps which I'm not going to go into great detail here. I will emphasize you'd be absorption for us in spectrometive scanning. And of course, you can read about that. Okay, so you do spectroscopy scanning as well. Yeah, exactly. It's part of the microscopy scanning. So this is all computerized and it's detected and of course we've done the amplifier measures the content of these particular elements that are now in or contained. If there's nothing there, we won't see it. If there's something there, we will pick that up within the lipozone or the fatty capsid that is being used to carry the ingredients or the compounds or chemicals to the various sources. And I did not explain which I need to explain is that the synthetic or the which is emitted by all the components that they're using genetically modified nucleic acids, genetically modified. So how they modify those, of course, is speculative on our part. They admit to the fact that they're using it. But what is important to understand is these particular nucleic acids are encrypted with a program to go to specific areas of the bottom. So they know exactly, yeah, they know exactly. They've been driven. It's kind of like when you get in your car and you want to go somewhere, what do you do? You either get on your cell phone or you get on. You figure out the route right? When you put that in digital, and you're higher than tells you where to go. So this information has been impregnated into the nucleic acid and also is naturally occurring by the very source of where those nucleic acids are coming from. And that was the work of Dr. Lee when he developed proto morphogens to drive specific ingredients or nutrients, in this case, vitamins and minerals, because what you can do that's good for the body can also be used to do bad for the body. So you can drive good or bad. But what happens using radioactive isotopes, tracers, we then trace the specific area and followed where this material actually goes. So whatever is in the capsid goes to the reproductive proteins, goes to the bone marrow, goes to because that's what's been programmed. And the nucleic acid is kind of like the truck that's driving the contents to create the theoretical immunity by using a toxin, a poison, either organic or energetic, to create an immune reaction. This is a failed this is a failed theory. It didn't work with polio because with polio, all we had to do is stop spraying children and adults at our food with DDT poisoning. Once that stopped, and this is even before the vaccinations, the polio vaccine, vaccine didn't do anything, other make a lot of money for a lot of people at that time. But once they stopped poisoning and polluting the environment with DDT, that was the chemical because the disease and the neurological for Zika. When you stop putting glyphosate poisons into the food or spraying it or putting it into inoculations as an adjuvant, then you prevent the birth defects. You stop these effects. It's all chemical then. It's chemical poisoning beginning to end. So there was never any polio virus. I mean, this storyline continues to this day, right? Life, wild polio virus is live polio virus. This is what is being projected as cost-election. It's actually genetic material, nucleic acid, specific organs of the body, to drive specific ingredients, chemical or radioactive isotopes, even triton, which has a life of 23 years. Two specific areas to do what? To heal or to kill? To heal or destroy? To act as a destruction to the women's ovaries. Is this why women are having irregular menstrual cycles and bleeding? Why within the first trimester there is loss of the fetus after inoculation because this is going past the blood barriers. That's right. I think it was something like 80% of the women who reported loss of pregnancy after inoculation were first trimester. The vose had been still borne from second and third trimester. This was causing the birth defects. It was the glyphosate that they used in the same people that own the vaccine companies, also own the companies that make the chemicals for... That's right. It's Bayer, IGFAR, Ben. What I'm showing you here is the observation of the face contrast of specifically the Pfizer which revealed based upon their morphology and that can be. I'm saying this can be graphing strips. Here's our picture and here's the standard comparison. Here is our picture and here's the standard that I'm comparing to. These pictures are shown are aqueous fractions containing the vaccine reduced anatomically, morphologically as we look at this from the Pfizer vaccine. As we go here down further using electron microscopy, we can actually then magnify the lipozone capstone. This is huge because I think nobody has seen this kind of micrograph before. Dr. Young, I think the earlier pictures you were just showing us looked very much like the lachenta calumna picture. I have seen that picture, yes, but the one that you're showing on the left even the ones that you explain this to me here, left and right. On the right is the standard and I give it to you. Right, I understand that but the but the left one. The microscope and yes, this is what you was being shown. This is what I'm sharing to you, but this is coming from the Pfizer aqueous solution is being identified at 100 times here, X, you know, I'm taking pictures. This is magnified beyond a thousand times though, but using an objective, an objective. Yeah, no, that's great. I just wanted to point out that these pictures that you have taken on the left, which I understand come from your microscopy. Look similar to what the lachenta calumna researchers found, you know, the University of Alexandria researchers have published. So this is, I think this kind of picture is now familiar to some of us who've looked at those photographs or micrographs. But the one that you showed just now, the caps that I don't think anybody has published this kind of. So this is this is the liposome caps that containing the the reduced glue graphene oxide that Pfizer uses. This is incredible. Just see this thing that we've been, you know, speaking about the viral talking about this liposome, this capsid, and here it is. Wow. Yeah, that's what it looks like. Yeah. So they're other particulates. These are new. You haven't seen no, no, they're kind of stacking on top of each other. So it's a multi-leg layer. You're getting a simple aster, a glumination, lighter colors are unfoted, mono layers. So you've got a single sheet of graphene oxide on top of another single sheet of graphene oxide. So this is graphene oxide that we're looking at them. Right. And so I'll get to how we know that. Okay, here in a second. Okay, and here's another magnification of this of the mesh of the graphene oxide. So this is sort of zoomed in a lot more, right? It's 500 nanometers, one nanometer, one micrometer, is that it? And then 200 nanometers. Yeah, 500. This is, I think we're missing a couple of those. That's I think it's under 200. But anyway, you can see the construct then of the graphene oxide. So how do we identify the actual morphologically? How do we identify the actual particulates then within those? So using a testing energy dispersive x-ray spectacroscopy reveals that, of course, the context of these lipids, these liposomes in the Pfizer vaccine. And of course, here we see, carbon, we see the nitrogen in the oxygen, which here again is quantifying the actual presence of graphene oxide. The reason we're showing sodium and chloride is because it's in a saline solution of 0.9%. Okay, so that's why I just picked up. Okay. Okay, so this is the contents then of these liposomes, these fatty lipid capsids. This is what's in those capsids. Oh, I see, so that's how you find out. So you see the capsids, you know, optical, you can see them with your eyes, literally we can see it here, but then we then measure what's inside there. Through the spectrometry readings. Right. Yeah. And here we have to use something that goes into the actual entity. So not scanning, but transmission. So the electrons are picking up these specific elements within those liposomes. And then we know exactly what's in that capsule. You got it? Yes, wow, this is major. This is the identification of the actual elements in the capsid then. Yes. And this is what we would know. And this is definitely on this close. Yes, in the Pfizer, the contents of the liposomes is 100% graphene oxide. 100% inside the capsid. That's correct. So what, what is the percentage of the number of capsids do you think in the liquid of the vaccine? Well, you have to imagine these capsids once it releases. And this is I think why they're having to get a second inoculation and a booster in order to get this material, which is not only cytotoxic, genotoxic, but also magnetic toxic. That's right. This is what's causing that magnitude. So as far as linking, let's say the human body up to the internet of things. So this is the sort of the secret potent toxic load that's carried inside these lipid nanoparticles, which are being presented publicly, because they're spoken off publicly by the manufacturers. As being innocuous and harmless and just there to help the mRNA get into the cells. And the people that are passing out and dying within minutes of the inoculation are already in a toxic state or already in pathological blood coagulation for a variety of lifestyle reasons, but once they get the inoculation that throws them over the cliff. Yeah, you're right. There are people who have died pretty much immediately a few minutes after an hour after a couple hours after. Some of this is the main thing. But I must say that anyone who's been inoculated one time, two times or even the booster. This seriously puts your life at risk, especially when you're exposed to higher pulsating frequencies, not a 2.4 gigahertz. But once you start getting up into the range of 5G, which is 8.4, and up to where the body where the graphite will resonate, the senior body, with the actual electromagnetic frequency, that's at 41.3 pulsating gigahertz. And once you get there, you're going to be like one of the people in Vietnam or people in Cuba or people that call me around the world in the United States is no one will recognize that I'm sick. They test things, they can't find anything. And yet, these are my symptoms, which are all radiation poisoning. It's amplified by graphene oxide. Absolutely. And the more of these boosters one gets. Which leads to, back to my article, the pathology of pathological blood coagulation that leads to hypercapnia or the buildup carbon dioxide, which leads to epoxy, because the body can't relieve itself. It's like you want a urinary, but you can't urinate. You want to breathe, but you can't breathe. The reason why is because there's no entrance into the lungs in order to do so, because the blood is thickened. And so, yes, the hospitals are using blood thinners. But this further lices the cells. You thin the blood out naturally by reintroducing the fluids that will restore the alkaline design of the body fluids that will support the stomach in its production of sodium, potassium, bicarbitate that will support the chlor, the hemoglobin, to build up so it can saturate this radiation. So, I can saturate these particulates or these this poison that you can build healthy neutrophils that you are releasing from the lymphocytes, reduced oxygen or reduced hydrogen. This is what works and explains why some of the therapeutics are working and why some of them are not working. Okay. So, yeah, absolutely. And adults sounds like that once this stuff gets into your blood and into your interstitial fluid and into your organs, it's not just going to go out by itself. It kind of needs to be removed in some way, right? And this brings up the issue of detoxification. How you would detox through this. Well, yeah, I don't know that we're there yet and that could be another discussion. Oh, yeah, yeah, definitely. But yes, there are ways to restore the alkaline design of your body fluids. There is a way, if you're dealing with a sweating pool and your pool is showing you know, the production of algae and starting to turn green, yeah, you got to get a net out there and clean it up and then you've got to shock. Right. You got to shock without the linity to raise the pH back up and restore the alkaline design of the so that so that it doesn't give rise to these transformations. That's right. Yeah. Wow. I hope people who have taken the vaccine will watch this because it's immense. What I think you are talking about, Dr. Young, because you are really showing us how dangerous and deadly these vaccines are, which people don't understand. And the beings, I can't even take in that somebody could put this product out in the market. You know, could actually let this happen to anybody. Well, they're, they're, they're, they explain themselves in their, in their conferences that they hold medical conferences and other sides. You just have to listen to the words and what they're speaking. Listen very carefully. Really? These technocrats, they do reveal listen to those that are talking about what's coming this October. They're talking about a wave. That's right. They don't come out of wave. A third wave is radiation, which is going to be causing outfections, which is going to be blamed on a phantom virus. The wave is the interaction between pulsating vibration of frequencies within the 5G range or higher, interacting with the graphene oxide, which is now contained within your fatty tissues. Okay, because that's where the body pushes it. And so it's in the brain. It's in the, it's a connective tissue. You'd be in all the fatty tissues, potentially in the muscles. And because, or crystallized. And because, so it becomes a magnet. That's why people when they, they're using magnets can attach them to the shot site or to other parts of the body. And that study's already been done on the side of anoculation or the opposite arm where there is no anoculation. Once it, once that goes into the interstitial fluids of the interstitial, it travels, there's no, there's no blocking. It passes through every barrier. And that's why I believe I've suggested and have advised, you know, and answered questions that relates to women who are having, you know, irregular periods to, you know, continual flow for weeks on end or, reported fetuses. This, this is what's happening. These compounds are interacting with pulsating microwave that is causing these, these injuries. And so it can, it can happen at any time. Anytime. So we were, we're using ultraviolet fluorescent testing. And it's not just the Pfizer. And in determining the, here we see at the peak, we're seeing it's compatible with the peak of reduced graphene oxide at 270 nanometers. And, and then, and then we go to other interesting things, such as we actually found, you know, within the aquisolutions parasite. Yes, this is another really horrifying discovery that you have made and that you have published. So, so this is a parasite, which there are many variants of which many are lethal. I'm wondering what, what, what a parasite like this. Is this, is this something that is just random based upon, you know, the cloniness of the facility, you know, or was it purposely placed within this inoculation? Which vaccine was it found? This is a Pfizer. It's a Pfizer vaccine. And it's an actual parasite. It's a nice, well, parasite. This, this electron micrograph with the actual phase contrast micrograph of this particular parasite. I see. Going on, we can then identify other elements within the Pfizer vaccine. Of course, they've already admitted to the fact that it contains genetically modified organisms, which is the driver of these, of this lipozoam capsid to specific areas of the body. But these have been tested. We go to the AstraZeneca vaccine and some of the non-disclosed ingredients. Once again, they fall within the range of the identification for the element of graphing oxide using X-ray fluorescent instrument was used to evaluate these adjuvants. Also identified polyethylene glycol and ethylene alcohol. And here again, I don't recommend these acids or compounds in a compromised body. And of course, can be in of themselves. Of course, we all know that ethylene glycol is used in in antifreeze. Polyethylene glycol is used as a protectant, as for that capsid. And in the Pfizer, it's actually coated with polyethylene glycol. And so that was picked up by the scanning electron microscope. That was one of the ingredients they actually disclosed. We actually did publish about that. And that verifies the fact that here's the quantitative information validating that fact. Jansen was the same, except their concoction was a little bit different. Their particles were composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a carbon-based glue. So when you look at this, you've got graphing oxide and all of a sudden you have high levels of iron. That's part of the stainless steel. The iron. The stainless steel is made from, if I'm correct on this, I believe, a iron and also nickel. Nickel, right? Nickel is right here. So this is what was found in... So this is what's making people magnetic then possible? Yeah, so if you're getting this will trigger the pathological blood coagulation, the coronavirus, and the spike protein effect. And of course this leads to the generation of the cell membrane, which activates the clotting factors, which then leads to pathological blood coagulation, hypercapnion, and hypoxia and suffocation, death by suffocation. And of course this is what... And this is possibly what's being now so-called quote-unquote diagnosed as the delta variant when people come back to the hospital and start to bring it on to the hospital. No, they have everyone, they have a variant for every letter of the alphabet. So it's over 40,000. These are all computer generated. They're not real. They just vary within their genetic composition, so it must be a variant, even though they haven't isolated. There's been no isolation of the Delta Delta. Nothing was isolated, so how could any variant be isolated, right? Well, no, they're not... So these variants, they just put names to them. This was... They had the alpha, the beta, you know... Lambda has come along, I think. And we're up to D, so... Data? Delta, but yeah, here again, these variants are named by bad actors. Well, the whole product, I think the whole project over here, appears to have been a concoction of bad actors. Yeah, so here again, if we go back, we see what's in the Pfizer-Aquia solution or what was contained within the vaccine vial. Now we go to the AstraZeneca, an additional ingredients, which are also being emitted by others, contained within the fact sheet. And of course, the carbon-based blue of reduced graphing oxide, and in the... This was found in the Janssen vaccine. J&J. So this is what we see here, and we see... I think I'm a spoke. I mentioned this was contained within the AstraZeneca, and this was... No, no, I think initially when you were talking about it, you did talk about this being in the Janssen and Janssen. Yeah, okay, the Janssen and Janssen and the Stainless still, I just want to make sure that we did not find this in the AstraZeneca. Okay. And we... The PG and the Eiffelina alcohol are carcinogenic and genotoxin. So I don't recommend those in your daily vaccines or inoculations or diet. Did you find graphing oxide in the AstraZeneca though? Yes. You did, right? Yes, yeah, here it is right here. Okay. So in the Astra... No, that's Janssen. Let's go back up here. This one. Here we see the graphing oxide, and then the high levels of iron. Oh, there is iron there too, in the AstraZeneca. Yeah, the AstraZeneca. Right. Yeah. So we've got a combination. There's the sodium and chloride from the saline solution. Rhyme, iron, nickel, copper. Yeah, so you've got a little still factory there. It's being delivered. This is incredible. Huge amounts of metal, then, just being bumped into people through these vaccines. And why are pregnant people being, you know, a pregnant woman being asked to take these vaccines when they're putting all the stuff in them? Well, women or children? I mean, I... And children exactly. The various reasons? I... I don't want to think that way, but what other reason do we have? Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, it goes back to that issue of sterility and, you know, compromise of fertility. Yeah, so here you see the production of exosomes or the release of exosomes. And you see the spiker or the crowning of the, of the blood or body cells or the spiking that takes place. Here we go again. And I've put these in the article. Here's the more... This is under what is called dark field microscopy, which the light source hits the cell membrane. So you don't see the cell like this. You see it as it lights up from the sides of the... I was... It hits the cell from the light sources, the... diffracted to then hit the cell membrane and emphasize the cell membrane. Okay, so you're not going to be able to see some of these other things that are going on inside the cell. Right, right. But you would see whatever is protruding outside, as you see here in the spiky picture. Yeah, so figures 24 and 25. I'm not going to go into those. You can read those on your own other than... Okay. This one here is very interesting, which reveals the nanodots and the graphene oxide found in the Moderna vaccine. Nanodots in the Moderna vaccine. You've heard about nanodots, yeah. Yes, the quantum dots. You've been referenced nanodots and read some of the scientific... Okay, I'll definitely look at that. Nation and the reasons for that. But this is performed under transmission electron microscopy, which is like bright field. It's bright field microscopy. And it's quantified in the same way by energy dispersion system, EDS, and which reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nanoticulants. Many form bodies were identified with spherical morphology with some of the bubble-shaped cavities. And those are called nanodots. So these are the bubble-shaped. Remember, we saw those smaller? What we did? We're going to show you again. Excuse me, sir, going back. Oh, going back to those first ones. Oh, you mean the... The capture... And then we use electron microscope when we see them amplified, or magnified, I should say. Oh, I see. That's what those are. So these are the caps that... These are the caps, and of course, you can see the dots in the black dots in the graphene oxide. Okay. So as you go zoom into those caps, as you see this, then you start seeing the graphene oxide kind of studying this little capsule. The nanoparticle. These are little... And here again, they're being carried by genetic material to go back like a tracts like, you know, the genetic matter from an animal. Uh-huh. A protomorphogen will end up if you put it into the body, it will end up in your liver. So if you can specifically direct this to specific organs and tissues and glands of the body. But when we look at this, we see within the Moderna fraction, an aquis of fraction, we see the presence of the graphene oxide. There's the sodium. And the chloride. And we have silica, cadmium, copper, even saline. But these are some of the ingredients that are there. So we've got carbon nitrogen oxygen. That's the graphene oxide. Silica lead, cadmium, and saline. Can you tell looking at this composition, if it has a specific macarase to a certain organ that it's being directed to? No, that's followed by using radioactive isotopes. Oh, okay. All right. And you'd have to do it inside the body. You need to do it in a machine. Okay. Like a PET scan, where you need, we're using radioactive material. You'd actually have to find it then. You'd actually have to detect the existence of this material inside the body. Very easily, symptomatically. And what areas are affected. But, you know, here again, Pfizer's own research has already pollinated that. And has, based on their own research, where the liquid is particular liposomes, lipid capsids are going. That's right. And when you mention Pfizer, you're talking about those, the Japanese bi-distribution studies, which they did on rats, I guess. Yeah. Exactly. And from my what I understand, Dr. Yead and has made a remark that, unless proved otherwise, what you find out from doing it to rats is pretty much how it works in the human body. Is that correct? Say that last part again. I think what he said was, if no other sort of human studies are done, if you look at what are the results that are achieved with the studies on the rats in particular, because the rats rats are used in some way to stand in for human, apparently. You kind of take it for granted that this is the same kind of thing you can expect in humans. Is that correct? Yeah. I mean, that was revealed by the animal studies that they have done. So, here again, further analysis of the so-called Moderna vaccine showed 100 percent, 100 microns, simplest of reduced graphing oxon. So, yes, it's in the Moderna too. There it is right there. Yeah, it's in the Moderna. It's in the application. And you can see it in the spectrographic complex, contained within the, here's your sodium chloride, but the high levels here again are contained within this liposome, this capsid, it's filled with graphing oxon. And you said earlier, you found it with 100 percent filter graphing oxon. And there's lots of these lines. There are some other elements in there, but the Moderna is, Moderna and Pfizer is basically 100 percent graphing oxon. And with you going back to the Johnson Johnson, Johnson, you can see he's got aluminum in it. Oh wow. So, the aluminum, including copper, that's like a newer toxin. I mean, they're all newer toxin, I would imagine. No, Moderna, excuse me, oh, that's Moderna. Moderna is, yeah, I want to go back up to AstraZeneca, we'll go back right up here. We can actually see the graphing oxide with the iron and the nickel. And nickel, that's the stainless steel, right? Yeah. And then with the Moderna, they've included not only the graphing oxide, but they've included copper and aluminum, aluminum oxide and copper oxide. Is there any sort of redeeming quality about off these things going into the body? Or is it all bad? There's no, from my perspective, unless shown or proven otherwise, other than stimulating an immediate immune response, you know, I don't see how these are helpful in any way to restoring the alkaline design of the human body fluids, and restoring health to the membranes that are deteriorating due to chemical irradiation poisoning. This just compounds the problem. I see no benefit. Other than the various purposes. Right. And it's really shocking. So when we go down here, we can go to my discussion. And my discussion is the mechanism action of these new drugs is declared by the pharmaceutical. There's a couple with what is reported in this fact in the vaccine products data sheet. It's not clear what current medical say wants to understand that the new drugs, these new drugs produced by these companies which I've mentioned are not by the definition vaccines, but nanotechnological drugs working as genetic therapy. Genetic therapy, what I say, altering the drug, altering the cell membranes off, you know, in another way. Oh, it's a genetic structure. I'll talk to Genotoxic and Magnetic Toxic. But the vaccine is likely to be used as trickery for bureaucratic or tetocratic reasons. In order to receive an urgent approval ignoring all the normal rules necessary for new drugs, especially for those involving novel, nanotechnological mechanisms, which have never been developed nor experienced by humans anywhere at any time in the history of the world. There's nothing like this. This is a whole new precedence based on a theory that I take issue with. Trading in a municent. I don't believe you treat disease by using disease products. I believe you restore the proper environments so that cells can thrive. You know, white cells are going to do their thing. And this is not going to help the lymphocytes. It's not going to help the neutrophils or the eosinophils or the basal fields to do their job to manage and maintain the cleninous internal cleninous of the fluids of the body. And so this just has some other reason. So these so-called vaccines, I recognize your patent. And therefore their actual content is kept a secret. That's what they're using. Even to the buyers who, of course, are using taxpayers' money. So consumers, which are the taxpayers, have no information about what they are receiving in their bodies by anoculation. Humanity is kept in the dark as far as the nano-particular technology processes involved are concerning and should be concerning to everyone. But mostly on the possible magnetic cytotoxic, cytotoxic, genotoxic, nanobile interaction effects on the blood, which I believe demonstrated over years of research and the body cells. I know what happens when you put a chemical, I can measure it. I can qualify it and quantify it. I see it. And I can measure it. And I can measure it and quantify it. So the current research studied by a direct analysis on the aforementioned so-called vaccines by means of nanoparticular technology instrumentation reveals disturbing and life-altering information concerning the truth about actual toxic, acidic contents of the so-called vaccines, which brings a whole new definition to vaccines even though I disagree with the whole concept of inoculation for disease. So, in closing, I want to suggest very strongly the Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Janssen Drugs are not vaccines, but complex, graphing, oxide, nanoparticular aggregates of varying nano-elements attached to genetically modified nucleic acids of modified, genetically altered, RNA from animal or virisels, and aborted human fetal cells is viewed and described. Once again, the ingredients in these so-called vaccines are highly magnetic co-toxic, cytotoxic, and genotoxic to everything that lives on this planet. Plant, insect, bird, animal, human, and their cell membranes and their genetics, which already has led to serious injuries estimated at 500 million, and our eventual deaths estimated at 30 by 5 million, which is not being disclosed or reported.