Why I (Jim Fetzer) AM a 'Conspiracy Theorist'

Video Transcript:

5H! 12H! 15H! 16H! The fact of the matter is that the CIA introduced the phrase conspiracy theorist in an attempt to denigrate and marginalize critics of the Warren Commission. We're pointing out manifest inadequacies in their research, including, for example, that the backyard photograph showing Lee Oswald holding the Mandaker-Carcana with which he's led to have shot the president wearing a pistol belt with a revolver with which he's led to have shot officer-timp but were faked. In fact, you have four or even five with exactly the same face even though they're taken in different positions and we're talking here about an optical absurdity. The Mandaker-Carcano was clearly a plant. They created a paper trail because they had to find it obscure caliber weapon in order to plant evidence that would tie the alleged assassin to the event which included adding a 6.5-millimeter metallic slice to the anterior posterior x-ray where that weapon was known as the humanitarian rifle in World War II, for never harming anyone on purpose. It would have been an absurd choice for anyone with any familiarity with weapons. Oswald was a mediocre shot. I'm a former Marine Corps officer. I used a supervised recruit training, including marksmanship training, at the same recruit depot and rifle range where Oswald took his training. I'm telling you, he couldn't possibly have pulled off the shots. But more important, more recent evidence, we have been able to establish as many prominent students of JFK had already determined that Lee was not only not the lone gunman. He was actually captured in a famous photograph taken by James Eich outshin standing in the doorway of the book depository during the Modupe, which means a can of even been one of the shooters. I mean, this phrase was a very clever contrivance to shift the burden of proof onto critics of the government as though if they could not explain in every single detail what had actually happened, then they ought not to be taken seriously. Whereas anyone who's familiar with the difference between confirmation and falsification understands, if you can point out any major fraud in the government's case, that leads to its being discounted under the principle of the law known as fraud, vitiates everything. The Warren Commission report is tattered and torn. It was an obvious whitewash from the beginning. Now, what you have in me is an unusual case. I am a bona fide academician and scholar. I have published dozens of works, academic works on the nature of scientific reasoning on the theoretical foundation of computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, evolution and mentality. Before I got serious about doing research on JFK, which drew me in fairly early on, went in the wake of Oliver Stone's film JFK, I discovered that even someone as august as the editor in chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association was assailing not only the film, which is a brilliant piece of work, although it is not flawless, but a brilliant piece of work. And everyone who'd ever done serious research on JFK in the past, which I knew to be completely wrong and a gross abuse of his position, which led me to infer that if a person of his position in standing as the editor in chief of JAMA, we're going to get involved and abuse the Journal for Political Purpose, perhaps some of us with special backgrounds and abilities ought to become involved. And when I followed the series of letters to the editor complaining about his abuse, I noticed one from a fellow named David W. Mantic MD, PhD, who has both a PhD in physics and an MD from Michigan, board certified in radiation oncology, which is a treat from the cancer using radiation therapy, which means he's an expert on x-rays. I reached out to David and suggested we collaborate on a long article or a book. He agreed and we went from there. I brought in other experts because one of my greatest strengths is I know what I do not know. We brought in a world authority on the human brain who is also an expert on wound ballistics, a physician who'd been in trauma room one when JFK was brought in and two days later was responsible for the treatment of his legs, the sassanly Oswald and trauma room number two, a legendary photo and film analyst, another PhD in physics this time with an expertise, a doctor of magnetism, a property of white and images of moving objects. And I want to publish in three collections of expert studies on JFK assassination science 1998, murder and delie plaza 2000, the great's approved film hoax 2003. Now that was before my retirement from the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota in 2006. I also published in the meanwhile a co-authored book about the death of Senator Paul Wellstone, which happened just 60 miles north of my office where I had been a persistent student of that event in published 10 articles in an alternative newspaper in Duluth prior to publishing the book. So those were early credentials. When 9-11 went down and I witnessed the destruction of the buildings, I knew this was a physical engineering impossibility. But although I recognized it at the time, I remember thinking clearly to myself, but I can't imagine how I would ever be in a position to do anything about it. Ironically in December 2005, I found myself in the midst of an email thread with a lot of very talented people about two dozen, including many from universities and with expertise in various areas. And it occurred to me it would be desirable to create a society that could bring together experts from different areas to pull their resources, create a web page, sponsor conference, conferences, lectures and so forth and have kind of a clearinghouse for serious research on 9-11, which led me to found scholars from 9-11 Truth in December 2005 and invite Stephen Jones of business and from BYU to be my co-chair. That we're talking about politically significant events where the government or other powerful interests have the most to gain. It's a simple matter of motive means an opportunity when you approach these things. But the media is so dominated and controlled by the government these days that you can no longer rely upon them to give accurate or truthful information about any of these, which means if you want to understand what's going on, you're going to have to conduct your own independent research, which any responsible citizen ought to do anyway, just to verify the reports that they're getting from the government and the major media. Now, the fact of the matter is there's a normal distribution of reasoning ability in the population. Most people are okay but not great, some are weaker than others, some are stronger. A person like myself, a professional academician who actually offered courses in logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning for 35 years, to under-graduates is going to be an extraordinary position to enter an arena like this, dealing with all these complex and controversial issues and sort them out. That is what I have been doing from the beginning. But the average citizen who is simply bombarded by news bites from all the media, even from the newspapers, which have grossly abdicated their responsibility to conduct investigative journalism in relation to these events, is going to be taken in. They're going to be smoked by information. They're not going to be able to sort it out. They don't have the research ability, the time or the inclination to do any investigation on their own. Of course, the vast majority is going to believe what they're told by the government. They want to do that anyway. They're predisposed to believe in the government, which is supposed to be there to protect and defend us and look out for our best interests. The very idea that the government could, for example, sacrifice the lives of 3,000 people on 9-11 to promote its own political agenda is virtually unthinkable. I would think about it if the evidence were not simply overwhelming, but I, unlike the average citizen, have research abilities that go far beyond the normal. That is why I am making a difference. That is why I am investing the rest of my life to exposing these deceits and deceptions upon the American people, which turn out by and large to be brought about by their own governments, said to say. If you look at JFK, for example, you have to draw distinction between the sponsors, the individuals and groups who wanted him out, the mechanics, the shooters on the ground, their supervisors and coordinators, and the facilitators, those who made it happen. The sponsor included the CIA, Jack, was threatening to shatter it into a thousand pieces. The US military, he'd not have invaded Cuba against our unanimous recommendation. He signed in the above ground test band treaty against their unanimous opposition. Now he's pulling our forces out of Vietnam where they believed a stand had to be taken against expansion of international godless communism. The anti-castle Cubans wanted retribution for what they believed was a betrayal at the Bay of Picks, which was not the truth, but it was an impression that the CIA fostered. The mafia was upset because Bobby was cracking down an organized crime for the first time in history, bringing indictments and convictions right and left. The Eastern establishment surrounding the Fed was most upset because Jack had instructed the Department of the Treasury to publish hundreds of millions of United States notes on the ground that it was absurd that the government should be paying interest to a consortium of private banks for printing the currency of the United States. The Texas oilman were upset because he was intending to cut the oil depletional out. The Israel was upset because he and David Ben Gurion were at longer heads over Ben Gurion's desire to develop nuclear weapons. All of these rationale brought these parties into what could be called a collective opposition to JFK where the facilitator, the facilitator who made it happen was a guy who had the most to gain of all, which was Lyndon Johnson who had forced himself onto the ticket in Los Angeles in 1960 when he wasn't even on Jack or Bobby's long list much less than short. But these interests, they don't want to have the public aware that they were behind in sponsoring or bringing about the death of the most popular president in American history. I mean a man who is still adored worldwide and for all good reasons because he transcended the boundaries of his class and was operating on the behalf of promoting the general welfare and the best interest of the American people. My beloved brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neocons and the Department of Defense and the Mossock. There only two intelligence agencies that could brought it off. CIA and the Mossock and in this case they were operating in tandem. The point was to transform American foreign policy from one in which at least officially we never attacked any nation that had not attacked us first to one in which we became an aggressor nation. Eventually Wesley Clark would spill out the spell out the plan to take out seven countries in the next five years beginning with Iraq and Libya and Syria and Iran. It hasn't quite played out that way but not for a lack of trying. I can go into detail about every one of these cases and explain to you exactly the rationale in the motives which are perfectly obvious if you actually look at the situation we're encountering. But of course they didn't. No children died at Sandy Hook. For God's sake we have in a LA school superintendent by name of Paul Preston who was so upset by what he saw reported from Newtown that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education all of whom confirmed to him that it had been a drill that no one had died and that was done to promote gun control. We even have the FEMA manual for God's sake for a two day event with a rehearsal on the 13th going live on the 14th. Many of the participants were confused and put up donation sites already on the 13th the day before the event. Adam Launze's death was initially recorded in the Social Security death index as having died on the 13th making his feet, including 20 children and six adults that following day all the more remarkable. If you pay any attention to this it's absolutely staggering that the lie and deception perpetrated here but it's very cleverly designed to have maximal emotional impact. You got a bunch of kids allegedly killed that's going to strike terror into the hearts of every parent across the United States. Cleverly designed but totally sinister because this was an act of fainte terrorism. We all know the classic definition of terrorism is to use violence to instill fear into a population to make it more amenable to political manipulation. That's what happened at Sandy Hook. It's like it was fainte terrorism. They discovered after 9-11 that it was easier to control this script to have it all staged according to a planned agenda than to have it actually happen in Go live where the four Jersey girls, these were four women who had husbands who died on 9-11 created so much political pressure. After with standing creating a 9-11 commission for 441 days, Bush and Cheney were finally forced to do it against their strongest desire when they themselves testified. They only agreed to if they were not under oath, if they could come together and if no notes were taken, you would have thought we're dealing with mafia don's not the president vice president of the United States. This is enormously obvious if you spend the time and effort to research I had published 30 articles on Sandy Hook before I published the book. I have a contributor who had published 80 articles on Sandy Hook. Do you think we're going to go and publish something like this if we haven't done our homework? We have researched every detail of this case and it's completely disgusting. I'm just telling you this has nothing to do with psychology. It's not because we're credible. It's not because we think there's a simpler explanation for God's sake. The simplest explanation is that this guy went nutty and went into their shot a bunch of kids. It's far more complicated to explain the truth. And therefore the argument that conspiracy theorists are seeking a simple explanation is itself nutty. That is disinformation. That comes from the devious mind of Cass Sunstein who's been promoting cognitive infiltration of having government agents get into an infiltrate the groups that are searching for the truth about JFK 9-11 Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing. It's completely disgusting, but there he is. Prominent is can be in the Obama administration. Because anyone who looks at my work and see I've taken some of the most complex and controversial issues of our time. I brought in experts in areas where I was not myself an expert and demonstrated conclusively for example that JFK was killed by multiple Godmen. I've actually identified six of the shooters or location, the shots they fired by name rank and serial number. That in the case of 9-11 we've exposed how it was done. The fraud and deception involved in spades with Sandy Hook that we've completely dismembered and taken at a partner. I have a brand new book on the Boston bombing that does the same. I have multiple contributors across the board. None of this is solely my research. I bring together the best experts on these different cases. Put them together. Sandy Hook, we have 13 contributors, including six PhD, current or retired college professors. None of us would be doing this if we hadn't done our homework and believe that the American people are entitled to know the truth.