Jim Fetzer: OTO Satanic Pedophile cult @nswpolice proxies jail Christians without trial in AUS

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fatser in your host on the real deal. In Dallas, Texas, three shots were fired at President Kennedy's motorcade. It looks like one of those scenes of an old building game, published in a animated plot. When we are successful, I'm sure it's a fantasy. And we will be. We're ready to make, uh, to come to the microphone, so... We'll listen to it. A new world order. This one is Robbie Parker. They might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories, concerning the attacks of September 11th. President Kennedy died at 1pm. Live from the media broadcasting center, center, center, center. This is Jim Fatser, your host on the real deal, with a return engagement from Luke McKee in Vietnam, reporting on recent developments in Australia, where believe it or not, the courts are holding that, uh, say, tannic searches and religious rituals cannot be criticized, condemned, or prosecuted. Luke, I find all this rather startling. Can you give us some background to understand what's going on here? Oh, yes. This is our second engagement, but we're going to the first interview. I'm in the process of video editing into, or like a documentary movie. And I'll be doing that once the minister knew website, and it's probably a two months away. But so I won't be focusing too much on what's subject matter last time. It's going to be a fair production. We'll be talking about the OTO, whose founder is Alistair Crowley, and how people have been thrown in jail, and how people just last last month were threatened with jail, for religious vilification of this satanic cult. Alex Jones, Info Wars, in a video, will see a snippet of just two weeks ago, to call this group a child sex sacrifice group. But by law, they must be respected in Australia, and you're going to see a large collection of multimedia proving that. And let's go down the rabbit hole. So I can share my screen, and so people can see right now that on government-ledicate, people are being threatened for not respect the jail. And there's also a high court case in Australia, which is determined if the states, two states should be involved for kidnapping, are Christian, husband, and wife, and throwing them in jail without being in court in person, contrary to what Australia has as its Bill of Rights in Victoria, the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006. It says you are entitled to be in court in person in the prosecution, and the police, four Victorian police came to Vivianlec and Dyson's Divines House in 2006, and threw them in jail directly to jail. Four Victorian police, plus New South Wales police, to do a state-sponsored kidnapping, deprobation liberty, for nine months was the sentence, for refusing to participate in an interstate court, and on the 3rd of March 2017, in the highest court in the set of New South Wales, where Sydney is, in the case of Bernard Gainer and Test Corps, and you actually hear Test Corps, but stories seen in this podcast. We're one against the same person who's been suing my father or disrespecting two gay marriage activists who had an annual intercourse with a Russian infant, who are now American jails for 40 years, because the Australian police were corrupt, and they didn't get away with it. Even after interviewing them in our country before your FBI did the right thing, and that's Martin Newton and Peter Trump. So Gary Burns is pursuing Test Corps and Bernard Gainer, or talk about their case, and how it's going to the high court, and the OTO links to their case. So this is the, we have a case coming up in Australia, where Christian soldier Bernard Gainer, or GAYNOR, got Commada EU, a verse, an OTO member, Gary Richard Burns, is basically the case of Christian verse satanism, Christianity verse satanism in the high court of Australia. That's the topic of today's show. Well, that's all profoundly disturbing, Luke, and you seem to me to be making heroic efforts to try to cope with these issues, and bring some semblance of justice to Australia, but the forces are arrayed against you massively, it would appear. This isn't just involved for me. The OTO has sued a number of organizations before, including radio hosts from Australia, Truth and News, Radio Australia, who was sued by David Potrol, CEO of the OTO, or though, temperate, temperate orientus, if I'll let the teachings of Alistair Crowley, loveforlives.com.au was sued by them, and the Jewish Board of Deputies, and then ahead of the OTO, because the OTO is a Jewish cult based on trankism, also some documents be censored from their website, which were against science, to show that the Australian Executive Council of Jewelry and the Satanic cult, the OTO, are working arm and arm together. And then also a Facebook group for Luke's Army that protests child kidnapping spotted Department of Community Services, you would say, who does the kidnapping of children in America on behalf of the state? On behalf of the state, we're talking about some child services, Edith and... Yeah, yes, yes, yes. Those kind of people, they were sued by all the members of this Facebook group, all the administrators were sued. Some people were sued, we didn't even know what the OTO was, before the OTO was demanding $30,000 from them. And there's actually YouTube videos from these people, and the court documents from them on the internet. And we're going to see them. Now, this last time, we didn't have the screen sharing working. So, but now we do. So, let's dive in and see this government, where the Australian government says on letter Ed, and in law, that Satanic cults must be respected. And it's true this organisation to be a Satanic cult. So we dive in. Go for it. Go for it, Luke. Okay. Can you see my screen now? Yes, yes, yes. Okay, now, this is a blog, this is the blog of John Christopher Sunho. He's been sued 82 times by the one gay activist to fabricate hate school. And his case was actually used as justification for making these brand new religious vilification levels only in last year. And here we have the people, the anti-discrimination board of New South Wales. I'll just scroll down. Fine. To find the anti-discrimination board of New South Wales. Here is them in August 2016 saying, we don't need religious vilification laws. Okay. Saying that we shouldn't let the Jedi Knights be respected. And then we go up. And a month later, a few months later, in September, they are saying that the ACT parliament passes religious vilification laws. So John Sunho was actually mentioned in government documents. I'm going to pull up now. This is the bill. I'm just fine. It's popping up on top of my screen. It's not me seeing my tabs. So I've got the movies. There we go. I can move it around. Okay. Here we go. The port number 47. So this guy is called John Sunho. And here is his name being used as justification for making these religious vilification laws. He has acquired brain injury, from being in a coma for three months from a car accident. So he's unable to defend himself. That's why the gay bullies or homosexuals have sued him 82 times to get the case or they need to go up everyone else. And his, his, like they've sued the Catholic Church for suggesting that they support traditional marriage. That's hate speech. They've sued, they're suing a lot bigger fish now. But when they want to do the first religious vilification case in the ASC, let's pick on a mentally handicapped pensioner from New South Wales with brain injury who can't defend himself. And you know, they use his name as justification for making this law. Here we go. Here's the bill. Okay. And this is the rainbow labor attorney general. He mentioned this guy in the ACT. And then six months later, the same guy mentioned this being sued. So this could have been, this could have been planned a long time in advance so they wanted to get into something. Now, look, so look, if I understand it correctly, you're talking about verbal criticism or parody or attacks that don't commit any physical harm. Am I correct? Yes. This looks to be like a form of political correctness that may have gone astray because I mean, for example, suppose the religion practices human sacrifice is it then a violation of the anti-religious vilification laws to object to the human sacrifice, even though it's a part of their religious rituals? That's what the people would jail for last time. I'm going to put up a new story from the newspapers window around. I'm going to put up a new story, a leg defined side to the age of the youth. Okay. A couple jailed for contempt in vilification case, the age, you're saying, are you looking at this? Yes, I'm just going to go. A couple, a new self-righteous couple who divide a court order under Victoria's Religious vilification law are both serving nine months in prison. They criticised the occult group, the OTO, was a pedophile ring, and they didn't criticise, they just published documentation from the young Australian of the year, award winner Dr. Rina Nicholson, who ran the child sex abuse prevention program, regarding a genuine pedophile ring and this document that Dorsi that was published predicted that Channel 10 had a gay pedophile ring of using children in it, and since that time, Channel 10 has been busted for having a gay pedophile ring in it, and I can actually compare it now. I've got to look up the details. I put on my old law of victims of gay bullying and we've been added to the description for this show. They'll have to pay the usual figure that they've got for last $30,000. And since this time, there has been a court case that said, this kidnapping and throwing in jail without an appearing in court, this is a case for a website. I'm going to type in Burns and Gangler, and I'm going to go what year I want to make this, make it 2017. Okay, this one here is Bernard Gainer winning, having a massive victory in the Supreme Court of Appeals, but because Gary Burns is a gay pensioner, the winner has to pay the loser's cost, which is insane. And this is being, this case has been a pill in the high court of Australia because the new South Wales government doesn't want to pay for its kidnapping of its citizens, for allowing that kidnapping to happen for a law doesn't exist in our state, for disrespecting a satanic pedophile cult. And they are a satanic pedophile cult. I will listen to a video in a second of Alex Jones' info war saying just that. So Alex Jones can say it, I'm not saying it must be true, but there's definitely some truth to these clasps. Now, so this is the high court, this is this case is being a pill in the high court, and it's Gary Burns, the first Bernard Gainer, and Test Poverts. They both test Poverts in Victoria, not in New South Wales, and Gary Burns is suing from New South Wales to Victoria, and suing from New South Wales to Queensland with Bernard Gainer. Gary Burns, Peter Faxill, who led the city murderer, who published his letter in the Guardian newspaper saying, that the number of sex with children is unwantful, de-harmful, and wrote a chapter in the book saying, sex with my new old boys brings joy. So that's what triggered Gary Burns to start suing him, I believe. And Test Poverts, she did the crime of saying, I support the law. I support Section 25 of the Victorian Equal Opportunity Act, which allows lawful discrimination against homosexuals who want to work in schools. She, all she said was, why don't we gaze or pedophiles working in my preschool? And for just the same, that statement, gays or pedophiles, and I don't gaze at it, she didn't say gays or pedophiles, she just said, gays or pedophiles in my preschool. But that's just proving in different states and opposing queer law reform, you can go to jail, because it's not all law, if you stay with the status quo and don't go with the gay mafia, you will be kidnapped and thrown in jail for contempt of court. The gay judges said, you must pay for my, and a newspaper ad, in this new newspaper, and pay the money that you got to know back on your side, if you don't do it, you'll contempt the court, and you're going to jail. Let me just prove that. Test, call books, content of court. There we go. This is the ABC State Media for Australia. The gay comments still apply homosexuals, okay? And she's going to be... Don't go so fast, I'm reading it. Yeah. Yeah. Just go over that. The court proceedings have been issued against former cadres of Australian Party candidate who likened homosexuals to the federal files. She didn't do that. This is ABC Media, which is... Oh, it's their spirit. It's their spirit. Yeah. These people have a history of praising Russian input rapists, praising woman now. She also praised Tammy Lynn Charles, who I helped get arrested in Cambodia for selling younger babies to gays and saying, gay men, if you have AIDS, don't worry, the so-and-and-mothers will take your semen. So, ABC praised her before. I'll find it right now. Here's our pop. You've got two dads, better than one. And this is on the artboard. This is the audio, I think. This is why I deny this is a Christian vlogger. This is... I don't have the picture of the original article, but that's the text of it. I wonder if they've got... Here's a picture of it. Here we go. This is a very good picture to open up and view picture of all screen. Okay, can you see this here? This is the ABC praising the same Russian input rapists that my dad was accused of disrespecting whilst on holiday in Vietnam using Vietnamese internet. But my dad gave the paint tickets, which you can see in this app today, and I'm going to write it down. And Australian gay judges will all internet users in Vietnam must respect Vietnamese gay men who rate Russian inference because the court ruled. The definition of a homosexual is a male or female, homosexual under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. And therefore, the dictionary definition from the inquiry dictionary takes effect, which is a homosexual is someone who does the same sex act. So, is that... There's a little Russian boy Drake Newton that you see before you. Is he male? Yes, yes. Is the two gay dads next to him, or are they called themselves, are they male? They presumably are, yes. If they have sex for the boys or the homosexual sex act, as per the definition or definition with an elimination of age. Well, I don't think there's any serious doubt about it, is there? No, there isn't. So, therefore, they do homosexual sex acts for each other, and they do homosexual sex acts for the boy, and therefore they must not be vilified because it's not a little patient. The thing about pedophilia is that children aren't of the age of consent. They aren't old enough, responsible enough to grant consent for their bodies to be used in such a fashion by others. I mean, if this were a young man, if you were of the age of consent, for example, 18 or older, he could participate in these actions, and there wouldn't be a cause for objection as long as it was permissible within the scope of the law as it then stood. But it's similar with what's called statutory rape. A girl under a certain age in the United States. I believe the law varies from state to state. I know you're exactly right. Rape is, by definition, is sex without consent. No child under the age of consent can give consent. So, rape occurred. These men are gay, dad's, baby rapers. But if you call that, that's heat speech, according to Gary Burns, because gay Burns is pretty illegal fiction. A homosexual can never be a pedophile. So, this is what's going to say. So, look at this, this article. This is the first article about Martin Lutheran and Peter Tron without their names. Always six taken from gay pair. So, look at the date, February 9, 2012. So, there have been arrested in America. And look at this. This is the greatest gay activist, Alex A. U. in Singapore. Okay, he's the greatest gay activist in Singapore. He's got his own Wikipedia page. Okay, Alex A. U. Okay, this famous area is a boat over there. He's famous for making the first gay group of bar in Singapore. Ah, now let's look at the date is when he wrote this blog post. Wow, a four year later. And he puts up this picture. Okay. And says, this is just a, at least this happy family is justification for gay adoption, gay parenting and gay marriage. After I tell him, he's putting child rape victims on his blog as opposed to boy for gay pride. He's still, he's so proud of him, he won't take it down. And I complain to WordPress, also known as automatically. He also known as. What's this? Accelerate got LTV. Look, look, look, can you go back to that last article just momentarily? There's a paragraph there. And toward the bottom, it says it doesn't take deep thought to see that the real fear. One so deep that most of the anti gay crowd don't realize it themselves is that there may be no essential no. Maybe no essential difference between male and female. Why is this idea so frightening to so many that so many people are resistant? I mean, that's bizarre. Obviously, there are essential differences between male and female. You made a very good point because one of the judges on this case has no law degree. And her name is Jennifer Newman. And she's signing the petition saying, is saying exactly the same thing as a gay act of this judge. So Jennifer Newman would just be exposed on Berlin again as well as a little bit with my research. But I have her taking pictures of her, her taking her Jewish husband and her lesbian and his lesbian daughter. To the gay pride parade, it's political gay events. And she's signing petitions all over the place. And she says she's supporting gay adoption in South Australia and the petition. And she's saying she supports non-binary, non-buck gender. Gender doesn't matter with parenting. So she's saying this is the gay judge that will against Johnson whole and my father, who is only an activist and has no law degree because they're called an in-cat general member. So we've now got a situation in Australia where people don't know nothing about the law and the militant gay rights activists stand in judgments of Christians. This is worse than start time. How could anyone have any doubt that there are essential differences between male and female? It's beyond common sense. Even till philosophically, it makes no sense. Certainly for points of view, for example, as equal under the law that all persons are entitled equal protection under the law, whether you're male or female, makes no difference. But there are a host of other issues involving sexuality, reproduction, emotional affection, and the life where it does make a profound difference. Okay, so what we're going to now is pull that aside. That's been a teaser trailer for the documentary we're working on. We're just going to focus on the OTO and the satanic, the religion of Satanism must be respected. We'll go back to the gaiter any later. So here is this main blog post I'll put online. The first part of the story shows that leaders of the OTO have written Vivienne Leigh with death in prison after they were sent to prison. Now, according to Jim Kelly, the guy who heads the OTO at the time, from his own blog, it was of me, it was another OTO member. So it's not debatable that OTO leadership is wishing people to die in prison for disrespecting their satanic pedophile cult. Now, here's the homepage of the ACT Human Rights Commission who is attacking John Simplett. You can actually, you can actually go to the actual, this is the actual webpage live now. This is their new publication act. And here we have religion. The religion of satanism is therefore under protective minority. And if we get you go to the homepage, if you're just going to come to the homepage, you'll sit still there. Let us use transgender children's sports. And then we have these new laws that come in. Oh, the new laws only came in force on the third of April. And yet they suddenly are forcing them early. This is interesting. I'm not going to go on and that was a new stuff. Gender identity. I'm so sure I worked there. I'm going to have to get an answer. Look, this is a general question. Do you think that there could be so much effort to impose these anti-discrimination laws? Because so many in the elite, even among the judges and high ranking politicians are engaged in pedophilia activities themselves. Yes, it's a long story. Down the track will get into the shape down of first we want to introduce you to who's paying for these lawsuits and who's behind it. Then I'll show you how this government leader was compromised by a pitifully scandal and how he directed money from his own charity to go to the law. The legal trust fund that works pro-vino for his OTO's Tannick Philippol call and their funding that group is more here. The public interest advocacy center. ASN.au, association.au and they they've been there to people behind Gary Burns and behind the OTO. Look, I raise a question especially because I interviewed Jim Rossstein who was a New York PD Gold Shield detective who cracked many pedophile cases. And he explained to me that often he'd bring a solid case to the district attorney who had declined to prosecute to take it to a grand jury on political grounds. And when I explained to you in some of the findings from the Anthony Wiener treasure trove that Wikipedia had released, but which had come into the possession of the New York police department and asked him if he were surprised. He said no, he wasn't surprised at all because based upon his experience as much as 70% of the political elite in the country or engage in pedophilia. I found that rather shocking but it seems to fit the evidence. Let me tell you how it works. Let's just say that a particular rich family has all the money in the world and control the insurance of money and then help make control of their minions. If you want to deceive to be a ruler and become a politician, then over the politician in the major party you have to join a secret society, prove your loyalty by compromising yourself so you can be blackmailed in the future if you ever disobey the real power structure. And basically Western governments is fueled by the sexual abuse of children. That's how it works. These secret societies are there to provide politicians with children to rape so they can be blackmailed so they always do the bidding of their public mass. That's my view but that's all speculation of course. Let's just go on the facts, the case law, the government in the head. Let's dive into that now. I'm going to say, okay, so my friends, I got a letter on, who was this letter sent, 24th January, even before this bill came into effect. I have to check. Now, look at this letter. It deliberately stole his name on it. But it stole his blog right. And one of the women who works in the ACT Human Rights Commission went to college and his friends were killing Gale, who was involved in the very first court case, persecuting John Sommar. So this has just been then being nasty. Now, it's from the ground of religious conviction, okay, 6 and 67, A or B and A, okay, this new act. Go back here. Number 47. They're talking about 67, A. Oh, it's legitimate because we can go up. It's justified by John Sommar, okay. So they even mentioned his name. And this was back in, this was back in, when was this the better written? It was written last year. So we go back here. Now, let's put the letter. Who has been, who's complaining? David Botrell. Who's David Botrell? He is the head of the O.T. O. Australia. This is the King of Australia and Satan's. Now, one thing you know about the O.T. O. The highest level in the O.T. O. is called Master of the Hermit Triad. X.I. A level 11. In gay, anal, sex, black magic to open the gates of hell. Let's go up to the top and let's see our top O.T. O. Researcher and academic right about, here we are. X.I. Rocket to Uranus, anal intercourse and the O.T.O. Uranus probably. Uranus. Now, you know, they've got Satanus looking aliens and masturbating Satanus and you know, all the research showing the O.T.O. is connection to gay, anal, sex, black magic, you know, official documents. Basically, the deal is, Alice for Crowley being a bisexual, wanted to control his order. He's a guy found at the order and he's the guy that these feminists say must be respected and he's the guy that says, all women should be chloroformed after 35. He's quoted as saying, I want to remain official blogs of the O.T.O. It says, a Daytona's diary, he said, it never been, that why do women resist being praised for their fucking and what else are they good for? So the feminists say that this religion must be respected. Now, what do you think a woman comes to you and says, respect this man that I'm only good for sex? What kind of woman do you think she is? Is she talking about her impact? What do you think? Luke, I'm just over at Wail and Bay Olsons. So, we'll get actually, why don't you open up the sites right now on that? Let's find where the quotes are. Let's find where the quotes are, I'm about that. That's the old page of the quotes here ago. So, we're going to go over here. This is the home page of the site where I got these quotes from. It looks very O.T.O. like, you know, Dress, Jedwood, Edward Cornelius in Berkeley, the O.T.O. up there, you know. And here's the quotes, you know, separate from your second 1938. Just for one of that quote, forming women as a few other, we're shocking ones here now. Let's go to the website, choose to online. Okay. So, how is the quote is quote quotes and who is this? You're moving too fast at Luke actually. Yeah. Some of these passages are interesting to read. Mm-hmm. Yeah. You sail past them. What was the date? 1939, wasn't it? 1938, 1939. I've actually put this into archivities. So, they take it down because they're going to get suit overalls embarrassing. Then we're looking for some quotes. Why do women resent? Okay. Let's go to here. Let's have to take it down. There we go. There it is. 1938. I also talked about George Washington. Do you respect George Washington in America? In the same year he talked about it. Yeah. Yeah. The first president of the United States. Well, in the same year he talked about George Washington having all anal sex. And this man must be respected by law of the Australian government. You can see the quote from the screen right there. You know? I've never been quite so appalled about Alistair Crowley. Frankly, I've never really sought to research. But everything I'm picking up about him is quite despicable and disgusting. So, this is an official OTO site. It's official quotes. It's a feminist design. Respect this man. He says it's the old books. It's the biggest feminist style of essentially, I think. And so, what else have I gotten on this blog? Let's just see what Alex Jones talks about Alistair Crowley from last week. Are you ready for this? Sure. I'm going to start with the first one. Here are these satanic manuscripts. This is not something that's easy to get a hold of because they taught about how to perform these child sex sacrifice rituals. Let's start getting into this. These truly satanic manuscripts. Well, you know, if you had any doubt that the that Hollywood wasn't into pedophilia, you should just look at people like Jay Z. They have the Kaysha, Katie Perry, Beyonce, so on and so forth. And they have what do they have? They have these Alistair Crowley occult symbols all throughout their music. They were assured that have to do with that will they do with that will and that will be the whole of the law. Right source Alistair Crowley literally have these satanic rituals. They made the marina up a grand bridge. She's done what it does. They're just focusing on same and an instrument and painting and eating and drinking whatever with that. That's the spirit of looking at Hillary. And that is our OTO and hold stuff. They meet with the marina. A brawm of it. I mean, we have lady. And here are these satanic manuscripts. Now, I'm going to get into this. This is an image. This is not something that's easy to get a hold of. These were something. In fact, this is being seen with the first time. These are manuscripts that were held by Manley P. Hall, who was an amazing guardian of literature. I mean, he helped start a library, the philosophical research society in LA that had a vast amount of books and manuscripts and literature. And he didn't only collect these satanic black magic books, but he collected everything. And he collected these books for educational purposes. However, he had several attempts and cases where these satanic alistacrallic groups would actually try to break in and steal these manuscripts because they taught about how to perform these child sex sacrifice rituals. As you can see, you've got babies laying on the floor. And that's how it's done, folks. I've seen manuscripts in LA, saying, these are really old. This is how they do it. These are hundreds of years old. This is something that's been being practiced in elite high school. I don't think so. As far as I know, it is not French, but it is hundreds of years old. Well, let's be clear. Manley P. Hall and everybody says, oh, this is a big site and so whatever. And I'm certainly not endorsing everything he did, but that was just in the pantheistically researching everything. But he does does have that giant library that ended up at the Getty Center, which you guys got exclusive access to. Millie waiver with your contacts in Los Angeles. I don't know if anybody that's gotten into the Getty Center there and the actual works of Manley P. Hall. I know some folks that would learn on the Satanist side of the Christian side that would probably kill metaphorically to get in to see those. So you've got the floor. You were kind of ranting during the break. Lay this out. Well, basically, Manley P. Hall himself was not a Satanist. He was just somebody who was an academic and really into literature manuscripts. He collected. He had like his own mini library of Alexandria. It was Aleister Crowley that he loads. And actually when his students would come to him and say, hey, you know, I'm interested in dabbling in the stuff. He would actually pull out a handwritten letter that he had of Aleister Crowley's. It was actually a poem. Basically of Aleister Crowley being a pedophile and expressing his pedophile less than once. And it was absolutely disgusting. So I think I can show that time. I'm not if it is the white state. I think he's been talking about later, but I've got another time he published. Why do you say he's about having sex with a little boy, but we have to stick. Yeah, it's difficult to follow when you interject. It's better to add your commentary after. But I see it's a fairly long tape on. Yeah, I'm going to stop. Run some more. Well, Charlie reportedly killed his own son. Well, you know, Crowley was just sick. I mean, if you actually read some of the stuff, he was a pathetic wimp. Just like people worship Kim Jong-un. He was a Kim Jong-un weak, pathetic scumbag. Exactly. He was disgusting. And so these distressing satanic groups would actually try and get their hands on these manuscripts. And Mali Pihol actually bought them up and hoarded them to protect them from these satanic groups. And actually he had a very untimely mysterious death when these satanic groups, they actually, in his old age, tricked him into signing over the rights of these manuals to him. And then he died mysteriously, very odd, you know, after that. And while there is this investigation into his murder, into his untimely death, and they were suing over that they wanted these satanic manuscripts, his ex-wife or his widow, should I say, she had to battle them in court. She ended up selling them to the getty instead of giving them to these satanic groups where they could be held and kept more safely. But it's just an animal. I'm not getting into me. I mean, I know you told me some of the stuff is off record, but I'm interested in how you guys got in to be able to see all of this. Yeah, you know, we were actually able to get in and see this stuff because we had established rapport with people at PRS through an academic perspective. And they were like, okay, you know, they've had people come in and do hit pieces just to just, in general, do a hit piece on masonry. But in actuality, these Alistair Kelly's statements, they call themselves masonry, but in reality, Alistair Kelly himself was rejected for this. That's right. And I want to say this. That's why some of my family have been masonry, great-grandfather, stuff high-level masonry. They're the ones that found in Texas, that found that America, towards Washington was a mason. The founders. He wrote letters against the satanic tank over a masonry, against the French Revolution, he warned Thomas Jefferson, but they'd let her try to kill him. And Frans, he came back and kind of woke up. Because Thomas Jefferson wasn't the head of the Illuminati. People say, well, I thought Thomas Jefferson is good. Everything's a counterfeit, the globalist. Yeah, yeah, it goes on and on and on. And the rest of it doesn't make any sense. Okay, well I assume it's too much. You go right ahead. This is... Yeah, it's so... It's so... Go right ahead. So they are... It is a satanic pitiful cult. And Alistair Kelly calls himself the beast, 666. Now, in one of the recent trials that David Botrall leader of the Australian OTA was serving someone for disrespecting his cult. He brought in an expert witness called Douglas Eddie from the University of Tasmania, until he was in partial. But he's writing books, which is a collection of multiple OTO members, so to say that they're OTO members. And I went to one of those OTO members' blogs. And I found another OTO, someone commenting the blog. And hello, that guy is clearly OTO, so I went to his blog. And he's calling Alistair Crowley the great beast, 666. Now, there's a great beast, 666 sound lights out of its satanic to you. If someone calls himself the great beast, 666. Well, of course. Well, but he gave expert testimony to Alistair Crowley, his mother's sateness. Not a sateness. Well, after the break, we're going to have to have a few more links. Because I had a link on the end of the comment for this blog, but the comment got deleted. It was another site where I was actually teasing the OTO on image boards. And actually, links to this woman's book and Douglas Eddie's book. So do you want to take a break, Luke, and do you continue after a break? Yep, that's not what the plan. Luke wanted to add an additional example of great importance that we'll introduce in the middle of our interview. Luke, please lay it on us. Okay, Test Corbett is one of the applicants for the Supreme Court case. That has, well, is a good type for the Supreme Court case where we won, proving that interstate tribunals can't kidnap citizens of New South Wales for thought crimes against the tannic pedophile cults. That is the Bernard Gainer third of March decision when that decision came out. I predicted the OTO would use their assets in the Crown solicitors office on Johnson House blog, which is backed up on the archive. It's exactly what happened, German only got the job to try and clear up the mess through organization created representing the OTO pro bono back in 2006. I was right on the money with that prediction. So this Test Corbett calls up Diana W. Knight, Diana Cainite at the ACT Human Rights Tribunal and says, I want to know how I call it. That's why the Supreme Court of Appeals in New South Wales, Ohio is called in our state, says saying, and we're world that you have no jurisdiction over us and you're a human rights abuser. And just hear the response from someone who says, that the Tribunal does not respect any interstate judgments where every single day the ACT Tribunal is publishing case law that refers to cases from other states proving she's completely incompetent. And she is calling to her resume. She used to work as a judge in a tribunal and should know better. So either she is lying and treating us like we're stupid or she's grossly incompetent. Now that you want to play a short clip or whatever Luke. Thank you for calling the ACT Human Rights Commission, including Victim Support ACT and the public at... A human rights commission has done speaking. Who is speaking? My name is Hassan. Hassan is Diane Knight available, please? I'll see if Diane is in. Can I have your name, please? What are you wearing, she? I'm not quite sure. I have to give her a ring. But can I get your name, please? Yes, it's Tess. Sorry? Tess? Tess? Yeah, huh? Can you spell that for me, please? At T for Theresa. Yeah? Theresa. Theresa. Okay, one more minute. Anna? Hi, good morning, Mrs. Diana speaking. Hello, Diana. Yes, hello, were my speaking with? As trees? Trees. Yes, I said yes. My name was Tess, but he couldn't quite understand. Yes, I'm that's okay. Is Sun, was it? Yes, that was her. Is Sun, was it? Yes, yes, that was the Sun. Well, you should have a bit of an accent, too. So I have a, no, I'm not originally from Australia. How can I help you, trees? Oh, yes, I'm just ringing regarding human rights as such. I was just wondering what human rights John Soon-Oll had as an Australian citizen of use of South Wales. Okay, and specifically to what may I ask? Yes, the ACT is acting outside of its jurisdiction in filing a suit against the citizen of New South Wales called John Soon-Oll. Yes, so your part of that case is that correct? So, Trees, unfortunately, I'm not entirely sure what the context for this call is. Are you acting for? Your name is on the paperwork, that's why I'm being... And so, Trees, what is your role in relation to, or what's your relationship to John? Are you acting for him or... I'm just trying to get a better understanding of who I'm speaking with. Yes, I'm mediating for him. You're mediating for him? Uh-huh. Now, you must know the case that you've got your name, too. Well, Trees, I want to be able to be clear about who I'm speaking with because the matter that the Human Rights Commission handles are confidential. And so, without knowing who I'm speaking with, I would be... I'm not able to discuss details of any complaints that were handling or any outcomes or progression of the complaint. I didn't ask you that question. I asked you why you are acting outside your jurisdiction for a citizen of another state. Yep, and to that answer the question. That's a question in relation to a specific issue regarding a complaint, and that's why I'm not able to respond to that question. Now, we... Sorry, actually... Sorry? Hello? Is there someone on the line? Hello? Sorry? Is there someone else on the line? The Supreme Court in New South Wales overturned the New South Wales Tribunal regarding overstepping its jurisdiction. And that's a New South Wales decision, Trees. It sounds like a similar situation with John Sunawey, the ACP, Human Rights Commission is acting outside of it, jurisdiction. I think you need to be clear about that. I said, please, I'm not able to speak about the details of any complaints from the police. I don't think the lines of detail will just come in. Yep, and Trees, what I can say is what your referencing is a New South Wales decision. And so that is relevant for the New South Wales courts and tribunals, whereas it does not have an influence on ACP. Does that make sense? Is that... Who is that? Hello? I've just got someone in the background, sorry. Are you acting outside your jurisdiction? That's what I'm talking about. And I'm just wondering why you've even put this case into the meeting. Okay, well, Trees, that is a question of law that can be determined by the relevant courts and tribunals here in the ACP. And so that's not... Well, I'm just telling you, you're just wasting time and taxpayers' money. Yep. And also the Human Rights of John Sunol that's been violated for over 20 years and I find it grossly, grossly incompetent of your committee. You're so-called Human Rights, which is nothing human about it, and there's no right only for a very small fraction of the population. And it's grossly competent of you, and also you could find yourself having to pay costs. Yeah, well, look, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but as I indicated, that is a question of law that is yet to be determined. And so... I'm not going on feelings. I'm going on the law that you are overstepping your mark. And I appreciate your position. What's the name of the... What you're trying to enact? Thank you for calling me. Thank you for calling, Luke. Oh, yeah. I have to say something, illegal reasons. Very important, illegal reasons. If that was recorded with on a Australian territory, which it wasn't, test court will be going to jail for breaching the Listening Devices Act. But I recorded that in Vietnam, and the phone records for the ACT will confirm that. So good luck getting test court, but I didn't inform her I was going to record the call before I did. And so the other thing is the court, her victory in New South Wales Supreme Court of Appeals, was on something called the Australian Federal Constitutional, a constitutional law that covers all states. Under the grounds of federal law, the state has no jurisdiction on another state. And so she doesn't even know what she's talking about. There's a constitutional law decision that affects all of Australia. And the only place it can be overall is in the high court of Australia. So this is really a battle between Satanus and Christians in the high court of Australia. And everyone needs to... All the American press need to know this case is just as big. Because all of these homosexual vilification court-prime laws at the sea of Apple is tweeting to Obama put in America in your country will never come to pass if we have our victory in the Supreme Court of Appeals in the high court of Australia. So every American conservative needs to get your local news in America to cover this story as the biggest, one of the most significant court cases to come out of Australia since native title 30 years ago in Norbo. The Luke, thanks for the addendum. Continuing Luke, pick up as you like. Okay, so I believe we were just talking about the OTO in Australia being a satanic cult. And I wanted to open up a couple of things that we've already reported to show. And I found this is here's an image board side where I'm being a little bit more hardcore and really rumbling up the OTO. And people are giving me lower crack back. And so what happened was, is they got an expert witness. I was just sharing the screen so your listeners can see what's going on. Here we go. This hippie character here is Professor Douglas Ezzy. And in case law, when local life was being sued by the OTO, here's the case law. This is the case law website of Australia. Okay, we've got Douglas Ezzy. Okay, I'm going to find some trackies, windows on top here which are stopping him navigating. Okay, there we go. I can press down now. He said the OTO never does child sacrifice because they were perhaps going to court them. So of course there are innocent. Even though there's been numerous cases of people screaming police cover up, namely one of the women who was sued by the OTO, the Australian of the year, award winner, Dr. Reena Mikkelsen, who wrote the dots here on OTO, only a kindergarten child sets a whole hippie brutal and then complained to the police about they're not doing anything. When she got death threats, feared her alive, she put out a dossier and changed her two names. And that dossier got the police, the public earlier than she expected. And she was sued because of that by the OTO. So we're going to be OTO's website. On their legal page, they brag about suing a young Australian of the year who ran an anti-child abuse charity. Here's their website. Legal page, here we go. We've got the final terms here on their website. You know, it's got the OTO and Reena Mikkelsen and their stamp on the court documents. You see that David Bartreill, OK? Reena Mikkelsen was sued by the OTO in silence. Now she's a good Christian woman and I can't say anything more than I've talked to her for her own detection because the OTO would come out of there. So what this great professor Douglas Ezzy said, is Ez when Alice of Crowley wipes this quote, for the highest spiritual working, one must choose a victim who contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most suitable victim for blood sacrifice of half a minute. And he said he's made this sacrifice of the own boys, 150 times. He's the unboykilled. So he's talking about murdering 150 children? Well, Douglas Ezzy, an OTO member who's pretending not to be in court says that's not true. He talks about these things to try and be taken literally. Now speaking of that law for quite a while, I'm going to go back to his lecture and a video here. If you heard of a man called Mark Dijsky-Fall, the name again? Mark Dijs. Yeah, sure. Yeah, he made a documentary about the OTO and Satanism. He actually holds up the book of the OTO talking about sacrifice. And actually, the book in his hand, I'm going to play the beginning of the video and I just search for Jay Z. I'm going to play the beginning of the video. He's standing by the front from the video. Not in a second. I know what you're thinking. Let me finish. You're thinking. Jay Z, the rapper, rapes, children. Now, hold on a second. I know what you're thinking. Let me finish. You're thinking that I just slandered him. You're thinking that I just defamed him. No, no, I would never say that about somebody as an insult because it crosses the line. Not only is it immoral, but it would also be illegal. I would never say that about somebody just as an insult. In this case, I'm simply quoting Jay Z himself from the song Monster, put out by Kanye West that features Jay Z. And I'm quoting him in context. Here is the clip right out of the rapper's mouth. Now, I'm going to find the pot way holds up. I was to cruddy's book. This is where I look before. Nah, he. From it. Yeah. Yeah, you go look up now. The book. And I have a video here of Jay Z wearing an Alistair Crowley sweatshirt. A lot of people might have seen the still image of Jay Z wearing this do what bounds will slogan on it. A lot of people are understandably skeptical that this was a Photoshopped image, but it is a still from the behind the scenes by satanic theme music. Let's go try and find the book practice where he says on page nine, you five for the highest spiritual working. One must according to the charge of the victim, which contains the greatest and pure. So as you've seen, this is actually holding the OTO book of the law. They're so called satanic Bible in his hand. It's actually in the book. Okay, though, I'm witness accepted. It's in there. Okay. A male of perfect innocence and high intelligence. Now, I'm going to go to an interview I did before with someone else, but it's already queued up to the path where an American from YouTube video, I'll give my research and put the link for the description. You can actually hear an American YouTube do more growth amounts to crowd, which are even more disturbing. By anything that's again, the elite, the two overgave target. Let's have a look in the list. Okay, we're to chapter four in. Alistair Crowley. As we're going down the list here of the most influential people and families of the last 250 or so years, who had a hand in the progression of the Great Plan, it is important to show that universally they are all connected with free-masonry, which is the modern day stronghold of the Great Plan to bring in the New World Order, also known as the Biblically Proposied One World Government. Confirmed 33rd-degree free-mason, Alistair Crowley, 1875 to 1947, was referred to in his home country of Great Britain as the, quote, Wickedest Man Alive, unquote, as Crowley once bragged to have ceremonially sacrificed over 150 children in one year, among other demonic acts. He was allegedly also a 90th degree, Mizram Wright Free Mason, a black magic echelon of free-masonry. Quote, for the highest spiritual working, one must accordingly choose that victim, which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim, but the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more ephesious, and for nearly all purposes, human sacrifice is the best. In the sacrifice during invocation, however, it may be said without fear of contradiction that the death of the victim should coincide with the supreme invocation. Unquote. Alistair Crowley, from the book he wrote by Automatic Hand, Magic, Inferie, and Practice, talking about how effective it is to use human sacrifice. Now that's the second book. The first book you saw from our dies was the book of the Lord that Bible, the other book that Alistair Crowley published, the published work of his, from his official publisher, from Alistair Crowley himself, talks about death of human beings, magic and fear and practice, the second supporting evidence, which wasn't used in the ACT court case, because I wasn't involved, I wasn't there helping them, I wish I was. So, it clearly is, it's like clearly, the sacred religious teaching that must be respected by Australian, lesbian, feminist order, is the sacrifice of children. It is not available, but there's even more and more stuff we're going to have. Listen, these are real projects you can investigate, you can actually see Mark Dice holding up the book. He got from the library in his hand, the original leather bound one, showing the same quotes. So, we'll go back on to it again some more, listen some more shocking stuff about the religion, it must be respect and water from the government of Australia. As a vehicle to interact with the demonic entities. Crowley was also allegedly a pansexual, meaning sexual attraction to people of all genders. In other words, he engaged in homosexual activity, but didn't particularly consider it gay sex, but pansexual sex, and more accurately, ritual sex to be used during black magic ceremonies. A lot of the people running the world also have this exact same view as we're going to go over. Referring to himself as the great beast from the birth of the revelation, Aleister Crowley allegedly had his first mystical experience with a supernatural in Sweden in December of 1896. This, according to numerous Crowley biographers, this particular incident had to do with Crowley's first sexual experience with a man, the beginning of his pansexuality. This is far too deep of a topic for this book, and will be better addressed in the addendum to this book. But sex, in particular, sexual acts can be used to interact with the supernatural realm. The same as mind-altering drugs, animal-human sacrifices, chanting certain sounds or syllables, aligning candles, fire torches, and occult symbols, which, such as the pentagram, hexagram, etc. It is my belief that all of these particular actions that have been passed down over the millennia are based in blaspheming the Creator God to the maximum amount possible in order to cause a supernatural opening or rip in our 3D time-space continuum, briefly allowing the interdimensional's access into our world. When you put all of the actions I listed together and more in one place at one time is when the real supernatural sparks fly. Crowley was incidentally raised in the strictest Christian household, and when Crowley's father died at age 11, it was his anger towards God over his death that triggered his descent and to evil. He explored any and all avenues. Well, there we go. So this guy Crowley, the bonus target, and the girl's absence. The bonus target is even too late to be in the meeting. You must take on your own to grow and become a little bit more. Look, it seems to me that Alistair Crowley is the epitome of amorality, in other words, he doesn't believe there are any moral boundaries, any ethical inhibitions from any kind of action whatsoever, you will, which, which, if practiced by everyone, reduces to the principle of might makes right, because if you can impose your will upon others, then they have no basis for objecting if they subscribe to his immoral philosophy. So this is exactly what these tribunals are. They're saying how Satan will go to jail. Respect, you must let a demographic that's medically proven. If you can buy in the 1.7% of the city, one CDC says of the world is homosexual, or is in America, it's official, Washington Times reported that study from the city. But if you'd like to go back to your image, go back to your image, Luke, so we can tell you. Okay, so I'm not a task. Okay, stop share. I mean, can we need any more of the audio? There we go. I actually found another YouTube clip, a top 10 countdown about OTO being evil. It's on YouTube. You get the idea now that our body, that body evils. You're a little close to the camera, Luke, just a bit better, better, better. Let's go ahead. And the microphone, you call. Yeah. So I got it. Now, so let's go, let's go. I was going to take you back and show that even Alice for Crowies, so I even dated boxals, expert witnesses, book chapter contributors, friends, and it's a few degrees of separation, but they're all OTO. It's his own witness that was meant to be impartial, which isn't. A calling Alice to Crowie, the great V666 in Australia. So the lack of life people have grounds to go to the, have grounds to go to the high court of Australia, or in another case of Satan's books, the Satanic pedophile cults, first Christianity, if we don't win this high court challenge. But that's, I would have no, there would have no sweeping. It wouldn't end the whole homosexual vilification and discrimination and game after the thought crime tyranny. That's going to the case. It's going before the high court. I'm going to go back to the screen and show you some more stuff. Your viewers can see how real this is. It's more government that they hate more Charlton's stuff. Is that okay? Yeah, sure. Go on to it. Okay, let's go back to Guy, be back into it. Okay, so we'll close this, minimize this, we know. For the button to... There we go. There will be a practicing cult today, and even recent... Okay, this is the YouTube video I talk about now. What's going to go to... Yes, here is... Here we go. Here is... The truth is, a future high court case coming up. There's the high court.goblinAU, leaked, leaked comments from Gemma naming. Gemma naming works for the homosexual in a city legal centre. That was first convolved and soon, John Sonhol, tax payer, funded again. And she works for the public interest advocacy centre that worked pro bono representing the OTO, originally that made New South Wales liable for this kidnapping. Prosecutor is going to happen once we win in a high court. So she is directly connected to working for the institution that works for the OTO. And now as their double agent in the Crown's list of disoffice is representing the New South Wales government and high court of Australia. So they don't have to pay for kidnapping, jailing without due process and sexual abuse of a Christian couple in prison. And whilst they're in prison, they've got messages coming in from OTO leadership. You'll be lucky to get out of life! You know, if you're ever lucky to get out alive, you better be sorry. Now that's... That sounds like a really nice people. I mean, only ICE is course for death of non-believers. OTO is in the same category of religious extremists, is Islam. It says, Ah, away or die! That is the OTO. The religion must be respected by the Australian government. So these are two women that have been sued. This is a love for life for women, the owner Christian, which has been to the Supreme Court of the ACT. And this one is no other woman who actually beat them by writing after David and defending herself very well on she's now a political candidate from Australian People's Party to easily allegiance. So let's just have a look and we'll be able to prepare. She got to search in even though the OTO wants to push your suit. David Bottrill, your CEO, a very weird situation of being myself in here. Can you suit? Can you turn up the volume? Then, by Mr. David Bottrill, please, the National Pressure Act. Actually, I can't. You can attach a table, which. So, you get the audio now. So, I've seen the letter of, we know David Bottrill is the leader of the OTO. Now, if we scroll down and actually got him, let's just search for Crowley. We've got his lawyer in court, the public interest advocacy center, the same one the German name of the court, talking about Crowley and lots of references to Crowley. So, let's just scroll down. This is a court transcript, okay, from Leg and Dubai to Regardsgate. I'm just trying to find a partner. I'm not sure the video is recording fast enough not to... It's alright, it's alright. I'm trying to find, I'm scrolling. Talk to that Crowley's book with the law here. And he is more Crowley. I've scroll up. I'm going to fly it in a second. Here we go. Now, the own lawyer, Mr. Ceyon, working for Pierre, tax payer funded, has called the profit of the lemma, Alistair Crowley. So, in Australian courts, the OTO accepts this is a profit. I've got another document which I haven't released, which shows David Bottrill calling Alistair Crowley the founder of his great religion. Now, that's like mixing up Jesus and Moses, who's the founder of Christianity? But do you think? The founder of Christianity? It's more. Moses is more the founder of Christianity, right? Than Jesus, perhaps, you know? And it became verbs, do you understand? As a properly came verbs, it's closer to being a founder. Theodore Roosevelt, the OTO, Alistair Crowley took it over and coined the term lemma and phenolite. So, the classic distinctions with identifying Moses with the Old Testament, Jesus with the new, and of course, Mohamed with the Quran, so that those known as in three Abrahamic religions, but I understand what you're implying. Go ahead. Yeah. So, he's called, a David Bockel's call, Alistair Crowley, the founder of his religion, which he isn't calling for his people, because he's wrong. So, he doesn't even know the bloody founder of his own religion, he isn't yet. He's suing people for not respecting it, or a fool. So, clearly in case, or from the transcript here, of the leg and the vine case, you know, you can see that they're talking, now, this is a interesting, if everyone wants to see this, they just go to johnsonhold.blogspot.com. I started publishing on this blog, because he got sued for the crime of making to world eyebrows. So, I gave myself access after downloading some mail from his back up to him, some evidence from his mailbox that the police are allowing a pedophile suspect to use a fake name. The same pedophile suspect who's going to the high court of Australia, first through an agena. And the police are not using fake name. He's never had an unsuried his license against me and johnsonhold. So, I also gave myself access to this blog, and I have direct access to press to make a new blog post, and press the publish button. So, I'm going to do a test right now, just put a lawyers back in Australia. I'm going to go new post. I'm going to go, this is a test. This is a test. And now, if I, this is using a Google blogger account, and I have public access, but I have, it's Google server to public comments, and there's two blog contributors. Now, if I press the publish button, like, now it's on the internet, right? Okay, it's on the internet. Okay, we can go see it on the front of johnsonhold's blog. Here it is now open the window. Okay, and it's off. This is a test on the front page of johnslog. The gay judge in Australia have ruled that the gay judge is a gay judge. Well, I published it on the Australian jurisdiction. John was responsible for my actions. So if the father lends his car to his son, there's a driver's license and his son does manslaughter, the father is responsible. Do you agree with that statement? A gay judge logic? Well, it's a bit ridiculous, isn't it? Yeah, well, that's what they've ruled. They've ruled that the man who gave the main evidence to the H.D. is a hate criminal, because he didn't enjoy being raped as a child, because he grew up to speak about it. And he's a hate criminal, but not enjoying the child sex. And I linked to his thesis, St. Seq's Marigastral Reviews, and his submission on the US Supreme Court got web website, which is hate speech. And so I'm a hate criminal. And then johnsonhold linked to my YouTube video, which had a link to his thesis, St. Seq's Marigastral Reviews. And a gay judge said, you know, you're three degrees of separation, you're guilty of hate speech, because you know, it's three degrees of separation from man to the crime of not enjoying being raped as a child. So the gay judge who has ruled should have not enjoyed their child sex. But that's another story, I know. Look, this is just extremely difficult to go through. I think it's very important to come to grips with all of these issues. I'm just expressing my, you know, the degree of distress that being confronted with these grim realities. Well, you haven't seen the proof. I'm now the case law website, ABC Blarves Pettos. Okay, here we go. Right, what are johnsonhold do? Okay, always come in, St. Seq's Marigastral Reviews. Here, gay men, St. Seq's Marigastral Reviews, right? It clearly references his thesis. And what are johnsonhold problems? Well, he's not a promise blog, but a link to my video. And the judge's rule that Robert Oscar Lopez is a thesis. A read that gay marriage thesis child abuse link. He said it's hate speech to me link on the YouTube video. Now, where's link to the YouTube video in case law? ABC Blarves Pettos. Okay, you've got the link here. This is what he's going to do on his website. Okay, all he's going to do is website nothing more. So we go to all his comments of the false retributed johnsonhold coming on my YouTube video. Okay, so we go to this video. ABC Blarves Pettos. Okay, ABC accidentally ignored his child rape as boylaver, whatever. Down the bottom, St. Seq's Marigastral Reviews, and all the references to it in the comment. We go to the corner link. It takes us to Robert Oscar Lopez, the H.C. Luke, Luke, look, you know all this stuff so well, but you're going too fast for those of us less familiar with the material. You're moving too fast. All I'm going to do is go to the blog and research it, but it is official Australian gay judges have ruled American, the main guy who gave the evidence against the US Supreme Court gay marriage case is a hate criminal because he did not enjoy his child rape. And therefore, child rape victims of gay have less rights to dissent than heterosexual child rape victims. Some of this is just so absurd, it defies belief. Well, if you want to see how deep it really goes, the gay judge put on his own blog that he specializes in representing pedophiles, and he said all pedophiles should go through arbitration. 1977, I'm the one here we go. This is the case law and the judge. He said all victims should go through arbitration. And on his resume, he said he participated in a debate. His arbitration a way to cover things up. And he uses a fake name in court. This is the judge. I want to see him be sent to the ag and prosecute it for the crime of prosecuting Australian citizens for the crime of dissenting against Australian government facilitated human trafficking. I mean, it's just unbelievable. This is one of the popular, if you want to see the whole story, I won't do it long, I just go to Johnson Hawk Law and look down the side of this blog post. If the 1977 New South Wales Name Discrimination Act was amended to say gay it's not the pedophile, so it will be drafted to consequences. And if you can actually go to the judge, talk down his post from his own law firm. Now, Luke, I'm sure you are, well, it's obvious. You're overwhelmingly more knowledgeable in this area than I am. The understanding is that has been that gays are unlikely to be pedophiles. Is that wrong? No. If you believe the Australian Human Rights Commission that outdid an Alistair Crowley OTO American icon, Mr. Kinsey, who said the gay is a 10%, they say the Australian Human Rights Commission has had gay pedophiles now in jail for Louis Vuitton, and Alexander Gollum, who is speaking of events on their premises. They say it's 11% to outdo Crowley. If that is true, then 35% of all sexual abuse victims and studies all around the world including Australia from grey parts, male children late by male. So a gay man is at the very minimum. It's three times more likely to rape a child, which is what my dad was searching for, but if we believe the American government's CDC, where they're 1.7% of the population, according to some professional gun studies, it's probably risen to about 3%. But if we believe the American government 15 years ago, or 10 years ago, and 90, 90s, of being 1.7%, a homosexual is between 25 and 35 times more likely to rape children, and now it got fostered their agencies, which I'm go