The End, Episode I - New World Order - Mirror The Verge

Video Transcript:

There has been a philosophical route to control others since man could first convey a language or put it in writing. As soon as people had power and one slime ball that came out of the ocean developed into a stronger man than his neighbor, somebody had the inclination to control someone else. You can see a mirror image of society, really watching little children even at a preschool, and you can see factions already starting at four years old. Who's going to be the strongest? Who's the fastest? Who can outwit the other guy? And who can bargain off the most barbies in GI Joe's to somebody else? George Bush senior just didn't stand up and say there's a thousand points of light in New World Order, it didn't just start in 91. What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind. Peace and security, freedom and the rule of law. You can sell anything if you think about it, look at the circus. And if they can sell and pitch their goods and hardware to people, and it makes people feel good even though it's a false sense of security, like we have to do this to protect you from yourself. Before you know it, they're raised up on that ivory tower, and it's no longer, we're doing this to protect you from yourself, we're doing this to control you and manipulate you. If we don't do this for your own good, protect you from terrorism, give you national healthcare because you're too stupid to pick your own healthcare, and you sure can't be trusted to build any highways or control the flow of water within your state or county, or dammit, or have a power plan or anything without our overbearing guidance. So you need to surrender all these skills and freedoms to us. If you were to analyze them mentally, many would be diagnosis megalomaniacs and sociopaths. Everybody has varying degrees of desires, even sick people. How sick they want to be, how in charge they want to be. But some people will naturally be fine of just being in charge of a few thousand people, others think in the size of nations. The best way to control a population is through resources. You don't gain much ground going door to door and kicking indoors and doing arm seizures. If you can control the ability for people to prosper and produce and to eat and to drink, then you control a population. By over regulating industries with no scientific proof, you have crushed the ability for American manufacturing to be the lead in the world. And if we're not the lead in the world and you start closing plants, people aren't working, which means they're not buying food or buying Christmas presents. We should be the number one exporter of wood products. What do we do? We continually, year after year, set up and set a new record of catastrophic wildfires, burning up in a matter of days. You cannot recover that. I can't waive a wand to make 200 years, 300 years of forestry grow for your children to enjoy. So it's that Hagellian dialect. If you create the catastrophe, then you already have an answer to that catastrophe ahead of the time, then you create a catastrophe so you can come in and be the hero and save them. We cannot continue on this path without imploding, self-destructing. You will always have predator and prey. As we get weaker and weaker, we invite the predator. Now we can say it's North Korea or China or Venezuela. An adversarial country that seeks to have a larger stand in the world with a military or economically would be a fool not to pick on a country with the rich resources that we have and not make an attempt at takeover. Do I want it to happen? Absolutely not. I'll be the first person to fight a red wave of Chinese invading us. I guarantee you I'll be up front with good friends. But if for an adversary not to take advantage of our weakening positions strategically or tactically, they're not going to pass that up. And I don't see how we're going to get out of the curve. We're not going to get through one more generation. Look at the ammunition cells that have been going on. What does the USDA Forest Service need to be stockpiling current combat 556 ammunition in 16 ammunition? Is there like some wave of smokey that bears that are rabid right now? Okay, somebody's preparing for something. They obviously aren't doing it to protect us. I think they're afraid of a cataclysmic backlash. I mean, you can't push people so far before they said enough enough. How do we mitigate the damage? How do we do something good? We do some introspection, if you will. I'm not talking some Buddhist thing. I just mean that old phrase, looking in the mirror, saying, here's what I believe in. And here's what I'm willing to die for. Is it going to happen? And we're just going to save the whole economy and country as we know it right now, or we know it historically? No. It is infixible as we know it. It's going to have to implode collapse. And we're going to have to, the survivors that want to prosper and be free again, are going to have to rebuild again.