JIM FETZER "Michael Decon" (6-29-19) Sandy Hook lawsuit and manner in which it was handled,

Video Transcript:

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 2… … … … …… … … … … … … … … … … … … Well, okay? IT'S DELY DELY DELY DELY C … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … A place where we don't feel… … … … … … … … A place where we don't feel… Tune in and drop out… joing me tonight on a very special edition of End of Days, the Michael Deacon program, we have a very, very controversial guest live for you. None other than the one and only Jim Fetzer. He has a lot to share with all of you here tonight. I'm looking forward to this one, folks. I hope you are too. Hopefully all goes well this evening. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for allowing me into your hearts and into your minds. Here we are again. On a night like this, I hope you are doing well out there somewhere, out there on this island earth. Thank you to those in America for supporting the program, and also those outside of America. As always, we have business to attend to boys and girls, and don't forget that this is a college show. Do love to hear your little voice. That number 760332. 8724, one more time, 760332. 8724. Now let's get down to brass tax and bring in the one and only Mr. Jim Fetzer. Jim, are you alive and well? I am my colonists. I'm pleasure to be with you. I have quite a story to tell. My goodness. And Jim, as we begin this evening here, I do want to say thank you tremendously for sharing some of your time with all of us here tonight. It's always fun when you're around Jim. It was a great pleasure Michael. I'm telling you, no one's going to believe what's actually transpired here over the last several months. Oh, yes. Everyone I suppose knows that Mike Palachek and I founded a company moon rock and books back in 2015 after Amazon.com had banned our very first book. Nobody died at Sandy Hook, which went on sale on 22 October 2015 sold nearly 500 copies when it was banned on 19 November. Now that's pretty odd in and of itself. Michael, you got a book selling nearly 500 copies in a month. It's going to be a runaway best seller. It would make its Amazon gets a percentage. They were going to get fat and happy. I'm not that Amazon isn't as fat and happy as they could possibly be. But it appears that Palachek centered the situation. They banned the book claiming it was in violation of their standards. They never were more specific about it, but in fact, it had been produced with a subsidiary of Amazon called Create Space. It was highly hit and violated their standards was very, very remote. It had 13 contributors, including six current retired PhD professors. But the topic was, of course, highly volatile. Yeah, because we had established Michael that the school had been closed by 2008. It was loaded with his best friend and other biohazards damaged by a hurricane. Even there was a major flood. It turned out in the area in 2007. So they actually gave up the school in 2008. There are all kinds of ways of knowing that is the case. We included a lot of them right in the book. Others were not so easily adaptable because, for example, Wolfgang Helbig had a very extensive video of the school inside and out. You can see all kinds of damage to the school that it was in deplorable condition. Lots of mold cracks in the wall. The furniture was all pushed around, even shoved up against the windows. They were using even beer cartons to store material. And when we put the video up initially, we got lots of reports from former teachers. They said, yes, that's what they do with an abandoned school. They use it for storage. So we do things words on the up and up from the beginning. You could even tell that from an aerial photograph of the parking lot because in 2000 and while the requirements for Americans for disability act would have demanded that you have blue and white parking spaces with blue and white signage for persons who are handicapped. And all the entrances or exits would have had to be wheelchair accessible. But he had a side exit that was just a wooden stairway. No wheelchair could navigate. There was a steel pipe sticking out that could have popped the eye out of a little kid. It wasn't a suitable condition to be operating and indeed because it was in violation with American for disability act requirements at the state and federal level, which I verified at the time it could not have been legally operating as a school all of this in the book. Not only that, but it was a 20 38 degree ground temperature day, which is not freezing, but it's cold enough that if you're going to conduct school with little kids, you'd have to heat it up. But no steam or heat was rising from the building. No doubt because the boilers were too decrepit to be functional after having been shut down for so many years. So in the parking lot, this is just looking at a single photograph of the parking lot. There was the oddity, the anomaly that all the vehicles in the middle row were part facing the school. Now there's only one access route to this particular facility and Dickinson drive. And if you coming off a Dickinson, then the directions which are painted on the ground have you turned right, then you curl around and part facing away. And it became obvious that what they had done was bring the vehicles in a single row and put them in two by two by two. I mean, it was much easier to do that way and after all, who was going to notice? What we established was this was in fact a FEMA exercise. It was a mass casualty drill involving children where events on the ground, once you understood you are getting actually a jumble of things that had happened the day before as well. It was on the alleged day of the event, the 14th of December, 2012 versus the 13th that we even discovered the manual where it reports that the exercise would begin at 8 a.m. and end at 11.59 p.m. on the 13th to be evaluated the following day is a real event where we had porta potty is already in place. We had a sign that says everyone must check in. We had pizza and bottled water at the firehouse. There were many persons there with name tags on land here. There were parents bringing children to the scene, but but Michael, of course, no child's going to bring a parent to the scene of a child shooting massacre. It turns out that it's standard for FEMA exercises. They provide refreshments and restrooms and supportive bodies and the pizza and the bottle water. It says right in the manual, everyone must check in with a controller when they arrive. It's the sign everyone must check in. I'm FEMA identifies its participants by color coded name tags on land here. So I mean, it all fits for the FEMA exercise. And when you combine that with the following day, the day of the alleged event, there was no surge of EMTs into the building, no string of ambulance, sister rush their little bodies off to hospitals where they could be pronounced dead or alive. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no 15 little first graders by packing them into a three by four bathroom, which had a door that swung inward. I mean, think about it, 15, 16, 16 year olds, let's say the average 50 pounds of piece, that's 750 pounds of squirming first grader plus Caitlin, another hundred pounds, 850 pounds supposed to be packed into a three by four bathroom that would have been easily filled by an NFL tackle a guard who weighs in around 350. I mean, it was an absurd story, but Amazon gladly sold those blocks. Sure. Because they were consistent with the official account of a mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut on 14 December 2012 and ours was not. Yes, and Jim, I'm sorry to cut you off there, but you brought up something here that I did want to get into into it here with you in terms of your books being canceled. When was the last time you talked to Mike Pelicek? Well, Mike and I of course are in fairly regular communication. I mean, we exchanged emails, I'd say yesterday. I don't think we did today. What's what are you thinking about? Yeah, I'm thinking what's ultimately going to happen with moon rock books, ultimately. Oh, it's going to survive and thrive. You'll be amazed. I mean, you're getting to one of the punchlines. Oh, perfect. Okay, I'm listening. What's happened now is, well, it's a long story. That's why I was in it. Go ahead. But yeah, Amazon has now gone bananas and they banned a couple about a week ago. They banned two more of our books and the moon book and the Boston book. And then a few days later, they've been three more of our books about Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville and Parkland. So we began with one book. We realized it since Amazon was not going to allow us to sell. We needed to have our own outlet. We founded moon rock books. And over the years. We have now 12 books on our list, which are you might think of as a conspiracy. Research library where Americans can go to learn the truth about these events that have been so politically significant. Because what I do in case after cases bring together the best experts on these different events and added books that will reveal to the public what really happened. We can go into any of them at great leisure. And we're not going to be able to do anything. Orlando is a perfect example. We recently observed the whatever anniversary. I like not to use that word because that's supposed to be something positive. But in fact, it turns out that in Orlando, the permit for the club that expired three years in advance that they repainted the club from white to black to show that it was closed. And we were able to see with only 11 parking spaces. If it had been crammed full of over 300 as the official account claims there would have been abandoned cars all over the place. But they were not there. They had crisis actors who were doing a very poor job. In some cases, they were actually carrying mannequins, literal mannequins toward the club rather than away. And we were able to see the emergency medical center even would declare they weren't going to charge for services rendered. The explanation being there were no services rendered. I mean, when's the last time you heard of a hospital not charging for a bandaid? Right. I mean, just a certain what's been going on here. Michael. It's amazing. At Parkland to give you another example. I was a school at one o'clock because it was Valentine's Day. It was a holiday. So you had 3,500 students went home. They only kept behind a couple of dozen. In fact, it's ironic that David Hogg when he participated in this March for our lives on the 24th of March. It was supposed to have been inspired by the 14th of April event. So it's just, you know, like a month and 10 days later, and yet it's got hundreds of t-shirts, all kinds of professional acts, roadways are all shut down. You have tens of thousands, maybe a half a million participants. David Hogg was interviewed after he spoke during that event in Washington, D.C. by CBS. And he explained that day he realized that belatedly something was going on at the school. And he got on his bike road two miles back to the school. What he'd forgotten was that the school, after laying the kids out, they were going to run a staged event. He was supposed to be a part of it. So he was really revealing the truth about his participation. He would actually do interviews inside the school with other students who were also engaged as student crisis actors to talk about how the party who was supposed to have affected this shooting, you know. They thought they had identified who was 30 minutes before he was officially identified. Above the many anomalies is we have a wonderful young girl walking out and doing an interview about how she left the school in his company with a purported shooter. And she said to him, she was surprised it wasn't you. And he gave her a double take. He said, oh, you know, because that was such an odd thing to say. Meanwhile, there was purported shooting going on in the background, what they did at Parkland. They had a swap team member dressed up in the helmet and regalia using a what's known as a sim gun, Michael, in fire simulated ammunition, which is made out of beeswax and laundry detergent. It will create a well, but it won't penetrate the skin. So we had medical miracles. Samantha Fuente's and in Maddie. These women walking around later with band aids on what's supposed to be AR 15 wounds, you know, one was supposed to have been shot in the chest in the abdomen. And she wouldn't be walking around at all much less with. Maddie Wilford much less with band aids, you know, on her wounds. It's just embarrassingly bad how they did this. The New York Times, all the mainstream media were running with this absurd story. They had to know was false. The New York Times even ran a story about the devastating effects of the high velocity, 223 rounds. They're just slightly larger than a 22 caliber, but they're traveling at such an immense rate of speed. They shatter when they enter the body and they do enormous damage, enormous damage. And how this couldn't possibly happen, you had fake doctors saying, yeah, they were lucky because they were hit with large caliber bullets with the caliber isn't even large. And that they sustain these serious injuries, which would be, you know, violations of laws of physiology. I mean, one of the one of the abortile elements, I point out about how to identify these false flags and lengthy program I presented, how does spot a false flag where I go through a dozen or 15. Is that you can't violate the laws of logic. You can have, you know, this something being both around and square at the same time. If that's being presented, you know, it's fake. You can't violate the laws of nature, because, which include the laws of physics, the law of engineering, the laws of physiology. I mean, we find that happening a lot in these events. And you can't violate the laws of technology. In other words, if you don't have the technology to affect a certain event at a certain time, then you can't have accomplished. That's true of the moon landing. We didn't have the propulsion power to escape low earth or, but we didn't have the computer power to, I mean, an ordinary cell phone or an iPod has more computing power than it was available. And then 1969 70 for the moon land. We didn't have the ability to protect the astronauts from the Van Allen radiation belt. They would have died passing through. One of the great features of the moon book and maybe a part of the reason they banned it is we did an updated edition here in 2017. Really wonderful book is one of my favorite of all the books we published. Where I added additional evidence, you know, we got a whole lot more chapters and it's quite a diverse book because it also has chapters on the death and replacement of Paul McCartney, which seems to have focused much emotional reaction is even Sandy Hook. From those who believe the official account and yet we got a guy who's about four inches taller. He has a very good teeth and a normal palate Paul McCartney was four inches shorter and had bad teeth and a narrow palate. He had a has an oval face was Paul McCartney at a round face. It all happened back in 1966. Apparently on 9-11 that Paul McCartney had an argument with John at the studio left and a half. It was raining heavily. He was in his ass and Martin. There was a girl stuck in the rain. So he picked her up and let her get into the car and she was so excited to be in a vehicle with Paul McCartney that she distracted him. She may have even thrown her arms around him and there was a collision at an intersection Paul was pinned in the car. She got out with the car caught fire and he burned it out. So the Beatles were stuck with a conundrum. What do you do? Where were you a fan of the Beatles by any chance? Oh yeah, absolutely. I tell you I did a show for a year and a half where every show began with Beatles. Every break was Beatles. I mean it was wonderful. I put together a Beatles tribute program by quite a huge fan of the Beatles. But you know it's interesting and ironic because I think that the guy that replaced Paul whose name was William Shepherd his nickname was Billy Shears. So you hear with the sergeant pepper album they're introducing the one and only Billy Shears. If you study the album the cover you see it's a funeral and it's a funeral that is signified by a left hand bass guitar that's lying on the grave side over to the left you see in dark images the man and two saws wax work of the Beatles. Then you have the resplendent sergeant pepper is only hard squad band all in this very elaborate costume. And you can see it's noticeable right off the bat that the figure you initially suppose at Paul McCartney is taller than the others. Well the Beatles are actually about the same height. If you went back and look at Ed Solomon for example when they made their fantastic debut on the Ed Sullivan show. They're all about the same height. Well this accounts for the oddity that after 9-11-1966 Brian Epstein the Beatles manager announced they were no longer going to be touring. And the reason of course would be it would have been very obvious to the fans this was not Paul McCartney this was somebody else in the studio they could record their music and the guy turned out to be quite a musical genius. In fact I'm convinced he's an even better and more creative addition that was Paul McCartney but he was not Paul McCartney. Several factors appeared have gone into the decision to not share the information of what it actually transpired with the world community. One was the fear that Paul had a lot of adoring teenage girls some of who learning he was dad might have committed suicide. I think that was a humanitarian aspect of the decision to go for another I mean this was a billion dollar enterprise and you know. He raised a question of what about the band well just so happened there was a session musician of their quaint who was known as the man of a thousand voices village years he could imitate anybody so he could imitate Paul he was he was not left handed however he had to learn to play left handed. John was it completely convinced he was going to work until he took him off to Africa did some additional minor cosmetic surgery to make him look a bit more like Paul. It not only have I did several videos about this but but Nicholas colorstrom of the UK who's the leading expert on the London 777 subway attacks. Where is book terror on the tube is now in its third edition has published a book on the life of death of Paul McCartney that's just wonderful yeah it's really weird that you bring that up because for the longest time I never really even. Look at the history of this band and seen that there have been all sorts of things. That have been speculated throughout the years and one of those things was that every member of the Beatles had died and was basically replaced except for Paul McCartney. Well that's actually the other way around the other way around the other believe any of them were replaced John when it was assassinated in yard. And that appears to have been because Nixon was paranoid that he was going to lead the anti war movement and had him taken out I mean it was. In all these cases you have pasties or blame for the crime and the real assassin or assassins get away I mean with JFK there are. There were now eight I had identified six JFK shooters but they're actually turned out to be a seventh that only on top of guard identified and I agree with him about the seventh and there turns out to be an eight who was on the south no opposite the grass you know we all know of. Where I've seen now two photographs one in the possession of Rick Russo another in the possession of a danger of the different photographs but it's the same guy with the same rifle but holding it you know in a different positions. Where David W. Mantic MDP HD was the leading expert on the medical evidence in the assassin age of JFK now believes that Jack was actually shot a third time in the head. We had accounted for four shots to JFK was hit in the back by a shot fired from the top of the county records building by a deputy sheriff name is Harry weather for. He was shot in the throat by from inside the triple underpass by an Air Force expert by the name of Jack Lawrence using this is utterly fascinating it was an experimental weapon of only a few had been issued he was using a weapon that actually had been given to Curtis. The Curtis Le May who is a chief of staff of the Air Force. And to fire this bullet that went through the windshield and I believe he felt he was acting in the nation's highest traditions because Curtis Le May himself had given in this weapon to use to shoot JFK but but he was still alive so that we had this guy sometimes referred to as the Cuban reach out and make a fifth gesture which is to bring the vehicle to a hall William. The driver pulled it to the left and to all to make sure JFK would be killed during the interval which I now believe lasted around 20 seconds he's hitting the back of the head by a shot fired from the Dal Texas second floor the broom closet of a Uranium mining company that was a CIA asset by an anti Castro Cuba Cuban by the name of Nestor Tony escape row using a man liquor carcano and by the way. This is the only weapon that was not silenced when when for example this deputy sheriff Harry weather for fired the shot from the top of the Dalton County records building. He was using a silencer he'd only obtained about a week or 10 days before he was actually implanting a man liquor carcano. He was using a plastic collar node as a sabote by firing it through a 30 out six this is why the shot was so shallow with jacks back and only went in about as far as the second knuckle on your little finger. It had no exit so that they could have proof that he'd been shot with a man liquor carcano but but the shooters for the most part were using their own preferred weapons which is why it was indispensable to get the bodies into the hands of the military at Bethesda. Where they could remove in fact it appears to have been flown unloaded from Air Force one on the opposite side into a helicopter well all eyes were on Jackie and Bobby as they were lowering the bronze ceremonial casket into a navy ambulance but the did not have jack's body within it he was offloaded on the opposite fly flown to Walter Reed with the best forensic pathologist in the military remove these various slugs. Since it would not have done have two different caliber bullets show up when the official autopsy was taking place at Bethesda and then the body was driven over there in a pinkish gray shipping casket and delivered to the back of the mortgage Bethesda all the while Jackie with his huge entourage in the gray navy ambulance was making her way toward Bethesda hospital so that. General Custer the radiation technician who actually took the X-rays was headed upstairs in the company of two secret service agent when he looked at what the world's going on is the gray navy ambulance pulled up and Jackie came toward the building because he was already holding in his hands X-rays the autopsy was already underway and he was taking him upstairs to be developed. So this is such fascinating stuff and we got a book about it to it moon rock books so you know that's a JFK who how and why that is the fourth book I published on JFK in the most recent. Yeah that's still available at moon rock books dot com Chris yes all these books are still available moon rock books with the exception that. The publisher I think out of a Dave Gary to who basically Mike Palichek and I gave legal custody of the company. Settled as a business matter I think he was every hence even about being sued in all 50 states of course that could go on in term in a boy. So he should agree that he would no longer sell nobody died at Sandy hook on the other hand when Amazon band the book I immediately release the first addition to the public for free so everyone can download for themselves the first edition of the book. Just by putting the title nobody died at Sandy hook into their browser they can have it on their desktop and one of the benefits there of is although you don't have it as a bound volume you can carry around. You have all the images in color yes yeah they're very very clear and comprehensive so I mean that doesn't leave any doubt that what was going on here was a female drill now one of the chapters 11. Which I co author with Kelly what who's made fabulous contributions to this case included a death certificate that she had been given by a Leonard Posner who purports to be one father of one of the victims of no a positive of Sandy hook. Now for reasons I believe had to do with a gathering intelligence about what was going on within the research community Leonard Posner reached out to Kelly what and he wound up having a hundred hours of conversation over a six month interval during which Kelly told when he as he calls himself she didn't believe where he said and believe he had a son didn't believe he was son died. He insisted she insisted he give her some proof she wanted to birth certificate that's her to get report cards so one day to her surprise she gets a note from Lenny you know I've got something for you and she replies what is that because they've been going back not only on the phone but on the internet. And he directed her to a blog where there was a death certificate a birth certificate a report card she immediately noticed an audit about the report card because. The school on Dickinson drive the name of the road there Dickinson is spelled with an ID ICK I and S.O.N. but the report card had it wrong D.I.C.K. E.N. S.O.N. which of course is suggestive. That this like the death certificate in the birth certificate were fabricated indeed in the chapter in the first edition and it was identical in the second published the following year 2016 I described the death certificate as a fabrication it had no file number Michael it at the wrong estimated time of death at 11 a.m. when even the official account of the sandy hoax shooting hasn't taken place between nine thirty and nine forty or nine forty one. It had a lot of teams with regard to the type. In the in the document itself because there are at least three different fonts and different sizes and different separation distance between letters in a dark texture in the background for roughly the bottom two thirds which led me to infer that it was. The bottom two thirds of a real death certificate combined with the top one third of a fake. So I described it there and cited other reasons for believing it appeared to be a fabrication well. When we published a second edition we added four new chapters we took out two I included one about. The relationship between guns and homicides how it turns out to be the case that when guns are bad homicide rates go up I mean we're being sold by the Democrats I mean witness the debate of last night yes can we we could talk about that in a moment here I did want to cover that with you along with the moon but let's continue with with this case here. Yeah yeah you're going to get it because low and behold to my utter astonishment last year late in the in the year I guess it may have been August I see a little letter from a guy named Jake Zimmerman. That's a little hard for asking me to correct three statements I've made in the book that describing the death certificate as a fabrication. And another statement I've made in one of the memoranda that were put together for the Sandy Hook president of the United States memorandum series edited by Robert David Steele which like the first edition of the book you can also download for free just go to Robert David Steele's website. Well I didn't think much of this a letter because it seemed to me to have no merit but then I was in retrospect now not surprised it turned out that on the 27th of November that loss it was filed here in Dane County where I reside in Dane County just 10 miles south of Madison Wisconsin. I lost it for defamation I was served on the 29th right here at my home and that the server said she never seen anyone so happy to be served with the whole law suit. Michael I've been contemplating how can I get all this massive evidence you know about the FEMA drill all the sorts of things I've been describing into a legal framework where I could make it available to the public and a form that that demonstrated its validity. So I was very pleased to contemplate the idea that Jim Jim you were already a very controversial figure now you have even more heat on you you definitely are soon a non-Grona Jim well well there are a lot of dimensions that Michael will get into it because you know you're being served with a lawsuit. You know what wants to represent me say it's rather interesting because there had been a fellow out in California by name of Alexander Patale who has a lot of trial experience he's not about 50 trials. He loved my work he told me long before that if I ever needed his assistance he'd be more than willing to contribute pro bono. So when I found myself confronted with this lawsuit which I welcomed so that I didn't you can respond to a lawsuit in two different ways you can make a motion to dismiss the lawsuit or you can serve an answer. You make a motion to dismiss if you don't want to go forward with lawsuit but in fact I wanted to go forward with lawsuit so I filed an answer in which I you know began by saying if the plaintiff who calls himself Leonard Posner is a real person because I long since concluded he didn't appear to be a real person. Kelly Wat had not only received you know this death certificate from from Lenny by way of the the blog but she had noticed that there was a striking resemblance between the alleged decedent Noah Posner and his older stepbrother Michael Vander and she'd asked friends she showed him these two pictures and said can these be the same person and say oh yeah sure the same person. Those are the same person so I put together a blog six of us went to work on this and we established they had the same eyes they had the same eyebrows they had the same nose they had the same mouth they had the same ears they had the same shape of skull and at that point it occurred to me the obvious thing to do was turn to Larry Rivera who had been able to affect the coup d'et Gras to the thesis that the man in the doorway was Billy Lawley. The government has insisted forever where where Harold Weisberg in the last four pages or so of his whitewash series the second volume photographic whitewash 1966 and said how the Warren Commission staff had a lot of trouble scrambling to debunk the idea that Lee Oswald was in the doorway where he'd been captured in a famous photograph so that in the volume about you know JFK who how and why I go through the whole history of how we established that the man in the doorway was Lee Oswald the right height the right build the right weight the right clothing the right shirt the right outer shirt or a teacher it over a richly textured long sleeve shirt that was rather worn. Marina would later recall having washed this shirt that he purchased in Russia so when he was arrested he had the same height weight real shirt and t-shirt as the man in the doorway so that the police in order to obfuscate that fact had him do his mug shot just wearing his t-shirt so you would notice a striking resemblance it's been a very. Arduous research effort but involved a huge amount I mean I published a dozen articles about how we have been able to prove very true that's been a door way that's true you spend a significant time with JFK and all throughout these programs well these interviews rather that we've done you have always told me how much the JFK assassination how much that has meant to you it's basically something that has fueled your interest going further down the proverbial rabbit hole as they say Jim that's right that's absolutely right so well well Larry Rivera who's done a lot of highly original research master to technique in the general area notice photogrammetry which is the application mathematics of this study of photographs where he discovered that you can verify whether to photographs are the same person if you superimpose one over the other when it's taken from the same perspective and you can match up the distance between the pupils of their eyes inter pupil area distance if you can match the interpupillary distance you can do a superposition that will verify whether not it's the same person. So Larry has a wonderful video out there about how he demonstrates the application of these principles to two photographs that superficially look like they're very different women one of whom at least is Maryland Monroe and he shows how we do superpose it's indeed two different photographs of Maryland although they don't look like it initially then he shows another example of Jennifer Lopez for example J. Lo and someone else who might or might not be J. Lo and he superimposes and show no they're not the same person so he goes through the whole principle thing and shows how the technique works and then he applies it to to Lee Oswald in the doorway versus Billy Love Lady well Billy Love Lady thought it was very odd they'd be confused because he said himself he was two to three inches shorter and 15 to 20 pounds heavier not only that but the FBI hadn't come in on the 29th of February 1964 wearing the same shirt he wore that day it was a completely different shark sleeve vividly colored red and white vertically striped shirt that more no resemblance whatsoever to the long sleeve richly woven texture sure on door man so we knew what was it Billy but what the government had done with his very famous photograph taken by AP photographer James Ike Alchent was to opt to the off-use gate the shirt and to actually darken the face so that he's holding his hands up to protect his eyes from the sun and Billy Love Lady but you can't tell from looking that there are some faint images of Billy that are facial features you can still discern but by off-uscaining the shirt they really you know change the story they did the various gimmicks during the hearings to try to justify claiming that Billy Love Lady had been a man in the doorway not Lee Oswald when in fact Billy was standing a couple of feet to Lee's left as you look at it from the position of the figures in the doorway are looking at the photograph a couple of feet to his right well what Larry did was find suitable photographs of both Billy and Lee to do a super position on the facial features of the man in the doorway and establish beyond any doubt that the man in the doorway was Lee Oswald where it fits hand in glove you can see exactly how the features fit when you superimpose the image of Billy Love Lady that ears are in the wrong place the jaw is in the wrong place the nose and then there it's just not it's awkward it's totally wrong it's not Billy Love Lady it's clearly Lee Oswald of course that's absolutely sensational because it means not only can Lee Oswald not have been the low demanded gunman but he cannot have even been one of the shooters whereas I have been remarking there turned out to be eight eight of the shooters and Jim and Jim is primarily responsible for the assassination in your opinion. Oh, Lynn and Johnson without any doubt he forced himself onto the ticket in Los Angeles in 1960 by threatening to expose that Jack had Addison's disease which made he wasn't likely to live a long healthy life that among his galleances with beautiful women had been in earth East German spy and more over he told Bobby if he weren't on the ticket then any legislator proposals coming down from the White House would be dead on arrival because it's a position of powerful majority leader he'd bottle them up but when it was a Jack and already invited Stuart Simon to be his running mate but lit in the head of box. And Jim we do have someone in the chat room by the name of hypnotic eyes they wanted me to ask you can you ask Dr. Jim Fetzer if he thinks Jack Ruby was the shooter who killed Oswald. Well that's a very complicated issue it appears that there was an FBI agent by the main above let's see boothole the Ralphson cake who founded the Oswald Innocence campaign has done brilliant work on this and I am convinced by his research and he's appeared on the new JFK show numerous times to talk about it. Oh yeah Plager Platter show Jim for those that don't know that you have a show. Yeah once a week we do the new JFK show and we've done over 200 and 210. Oh my. Yeah this is cutting edge research this is all relatively recent at the rate of about one a week. Occasionally because of conflicts we you know might miss a week but then we're back to it there are one five three news. Org now by the way Jason boss had brilliantly backed up one five three news dot net so that when this associate of his took it over but then sabotage the whole thing deliberately it appears Jason was able to sell save the day so that I probably have. 100 videos on one five three news dot net and we have all those well I mean if you count my JFK shows several hundred you have 150 to those along the. Yeah a lot of theory while there yeah yeah so it turns out that it appears there was an FBI agent who actually played the role of the shooter it wasn't actually Jack Ruby and of course that's consistent with Jack Ruby saying he couldn't remember having ever shot Lee. Jack appears to have been played for that role just as Lee was played to be the assassin of JFK. Yes I'm. And this when they were the announcement Los Angeles that Lyndon would be running with Jack one of LBJ's wealthy supporters. First into the Johnson sweet cursing and swearing because now he was going to help Jack Kennedy become president Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and explain what they had in mind he came out all smiles. Oh yes that was an excellent plan where Bobby Baker himself would announce that Jack would die of violent death and that he would not live out his first term. Or Lyndon actually sent his chief administrative assistant Cliff Carter down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination. Yes he was a bastard. He was a bastard he was ruthless. Oh yeah. Because that's an absolutely wonderful book about Lyndon by by entitled LBJ mastermind of JFK's assassination that you don't want to miss. Phil Nelson Phil Nelson wrote the book and if you just read the first few chapters about Lyndon's life and you see what a corrupt kitty was right from the beginning. I mean it's unbelievable man had no conscience whatsoever there's much more to be said about it. Interestingly you're you're query from the chat room is well founded because Ralph's and K actually has I think provided convincing evidence. At the events in the basement of the Dallas police department were staged they were staged it's not really fascinating it really is. I can't begin to tell you how unexpected it would be that to have this finding at this late date but Ralph's and K well that's the that's the problem with all these things that we talk about Jim it seems like we only get bits and pieces in in time. And it takes maybe even twenty thirty years before we even get into the stake in potatoes of the issue. This is over fifty years since the day he's assassination in this new book has just got absolutely sensational original findings that would never cross your mind in a million years. So I highly recommend I mean Amazon is seeking to ban our books I mean Amazon has now banned half of our dozen books at moon rock books. Now we're going to be unrelenting Dave didn't negotiate no longer selling the Sandy hook book but I'm going to I'm already editing it's almost complete a book about this round one of the lawsuit because it's going to work. Yeah I mean this is this lawsuit is absolutely staggering in and of itself. And Jim what I was going to ask you something else about JFK but I think we talked extensively enough there is someone else in the chat room. That asked about Columbine that was from Cody he was wondering what you thought about Columbine I think we haven't really talked too much about that. Well I haven't done enough research on Columbine to address it really truly there are others who have then you know I would welcome your consulting but I don't want to offer opinions for a case where I've actually brought together the experts and added in the book. I have all these other things. I mean I have books on Sandy hook the Boston bombing Orlando and Dallas Charlottesville Parkland JFK 9-11 I have a book that's not quite complete on Las Vegas I have another book that's not quite complete on Kavanaugh. So Boone Rock books is going to continue to be your your most valuable resource for learning the truth about these events that the mainstream media which is in collusion with the government and bringing these events about I mean look this was an Obama thing. Well the Obama administration nullified the Smith-Mut act of 1948 by means of the Smith-Mut Modernization act of 2012 in order to bring us Sandy Horst. Jim I'm sorry to interrupt you there but we do have a caller here. Sure. Yeah let's bring them in. Caller you are. I'm like oh this is Frank Beckett how you doing. You are live on the air I believe this is a Frank what's going on Frank. Yes it's Frank how are you? I'm good how you doing. Good can you hear me okay. Loud and clear. Hey I think I think she'll have a stream sniping you Michael over on a pillow talk channel or something but I just wanted to get a quick shout out to Mr. Fitzer. Good to hear him tonight great show as always but I just wanted to remind him to check his email box because with all the censorship going on there are some other tools out there for alternative publishing that he could be using. I'll just refer him back to his network but I'd like to hear more about the trial if you got time and all this is off air. Well I definitely would like to do that I just don't want to get too into detail about this ongoing legal issue here but we definitely can't scratch some of the surface no doubt. And yeah that's a good question well that's something good ask in terms of the books having an alternative because we definitely are entering that sort of weird time right now in society where everything is becoming censored or just inappropriate with whatever platform or content. And the people providing us these platforms if we're not following their guidelines or they're basically not following their trend of thought you basically get 86. Well let me tell you what they did with me because it was really fascinating to have lived through this otherwise I would never have believed it okay. I entered this knowing all the evidence was on my side so I felt you know I got an initial report that the judge was a good guy that we've been fortunate to get this judge which obviously is crucial. So I submitted an answer and I the alternative this Jake Zimmerman who turns out to be the principal attorney for Leonard Posner and just to bring home how I don't believe that there that really is his name. Dr. Rewan a fellowship of the mines blog had done two national searches and couldn't find anyone in the United States by the name of Leonard Posner. Because and I never quite completed this story about having Larry Rivera I said in the two photographs without telling him who they were one of the photographs was of Noah Posner one of was a Michael Vandner but Larry did not know who they were. I just said Larry without any context no illusion of Sandy hook or whatever I said are they the same person at different times and he they were suitably. Prespectively appropriate to do the super position so when he set the interpupillary distance apart the same he was able to do a super position and you can see Noah Posner turned into Michael Vandner and a gift that I've now published many times on my blog I mean it's absolutely devastating. There's no doubt whatsoever that Noah Posner is a fiction made up of photographs of Michael Vandner when he was a child no doubt about it. So I felt you know going in I was loaded for bear I submitted an answer that talked about a lot of these issues with Sandy hook that I've already described about how he knew it was a female drill how we even had the manual. The Zimmerman the plaintiff's attorney moved to strike my answer I filed a response in which I explained there were two lines of proof I was going to adopt here what was indirect proof based upon the fact that it had been a female exercise were no one had died which meant that anyone. Any death certificate for a purported decedent of Sandy hook would have to be a fabrication then in addition I was going to offer the direct evidence based upon the features I've been describing the typeface the difference in shading the absence of a file number and so forth. So I would have indirect indirect evidence now I had been really surprised that when I was served with the lawsuit there was a copy of a death certificate attached and when within days of my being served this attorney Jake Zimmerman called me I said right off the bat I said Jake I said you have any idea what you're getting into I said you know anything about Sandy hook. And I added you know this death certificate you you attach to the complaint it's so poor quality it's hardly visible and it's legally useless and he said to me that if I wanted a better copy that I should contact the state of Connecticut and pay 20 bucks to get a better copy now that struck me as very peculiar they are suing me over a death certificate. And yet they're giving me a copy that is so illegible is to be legally useless and that their argument and this is absolutely crucial their argument is that the death certificate that I had described as a fabrication in the book was it no material respect different than the death certificate that was attached to the complaint where they had a much better copy in the in the complaint that was a good example. And so it was filed with the court where you could actually see the features it had a file number in a certification by the town which occurs on the left hand side the town clerk being Debbie or Raylia it also had a certification by the state at the bottom by Elizabeth Fugale which means it's a true copy of the death certificate which has been certified by Debbie or Raylia. Now the death certificate in the book had neither certification of the town clerk nor of the state and in Kelly Watts affidavit for the case she verified that this was indeed the death certificate that had been provided to her by a letter posner. And so that was very, very strange obviously whether it's a certified by this this the town and by the state is a material difference how can they possibly argue there were no material differences there was also this oddity that it took me a while to appreciate that in 2013 Leonard posner had changed the residents of the decedent I ask you Michael wins the last time. You heard of a person changing their residents after they were dead not too often well happened in this case now that is amazing yeah let him positive change the residents from that of his ex wife where Noah had apparently been staying at the time he was supposed to have died to his home residents with his father where he claimed when I had the opportunity to question him during a video deposition right here in in danger. And I think that he was in the county that he done it because it was emotional you know he wanted the death certificate to reflect where Noah had actually spent most of his life. I thought this was very peculiar I wouldn't buy and buy before the case would be heard in summary judgment which occurred on the the third summary judgment had to be submitted by the 30th of April. I was in the summary judgment on the summary judgment by the 17th of June so this just happened like a little over a week ago. Yeah very new. Yeah I had obtained the I ran my summary judgment past Alexander Patali he liked it a lot he said however he thought it would be stronger if we had reports from from document experts. So it turned out that Peterson read Peterson had used a document examiner in Minnesota by the name of Larry Wixram so we contacted Larry and because it was through read he was glad to do it so. In the meanwhile we gathered two more death certificates Dave Gehary had written to Debbie or really got a copy directly from the town and I had written to the state. I mean I didn't know what Dave was doing when I did what I did I written to the state and obtained five more death certificates one for Noah but also one for Adam Lonzo who's supposed to be the shooter Nancy Lonzo is supposed to be his mother. Avril Richmond who's another alleged Sandy Hook. A deceit but who actually that's not even a real name. But she actually sang at the Super Bowl which was 51 days later obviously not deceased she was identifiable because she had this funny birthmark across her forehead kind of a slant like the texture of a football kind of leathery looking service very odd birthmark. She sang at the Super Bowl she was obviously not deceased I wanted to get additional death certificates for comparison and I got one for a dear friend of mine by the name of William Shanley who'd been a film producer and director and a very strong supporter of mine where I sent him and his request copies of the book many times for him to distribute right in Connecticut where he'd become kind of an annoyance I think to state officials who want to perpetrate. perpetuate the fraud you know and in any case so I not only got that the death certificate from Larry. A wickstrum and I'm going to read you a part of his report but I got a second death certificate because I've been in a long term discussion thread with a contributor to many of my books is both a PhD in philosophy and also a JD and he had two friends who were actually very very stupid. Very very smart guys one of who had offered to help if he could ever be of help and happen to mention that he was a forensic document examiner so I figured this is the time so I reach out to him to ask if he could review the work of Larry wickstrum and write his own report which he did and substantiated that Larry wickstrum had done it properly and that he in addition looked at Noah Posner's social security card. And while most people are unaware the social security administration has changed the format the form of the card like some 37 times so one easy way to falsify a fake that social security card is determined when it was issued and whether it was even issued on the right format of the card at the time well Noah Posner's was not. So he also wrote and this was in my opinion a very very thoughtful he thought any reasonable person looking at the who was a non expert in this area looking at the death certificate that I had received from Kelly what and noting the points I've been making about it with a texture shading the missing file number the wrong estimate time of death and so forth would have been very reasonable to conclude that the was a fabrication now. There were these four death certificates the one that was put up by Lenny Posner not only doesn't have the state or the town certification no file number it's redacted for the location of the burial and redacted in the social security box. The death certificate attached to the complaint had a file number had both state and town certification it had a redaction for the location of burial but no redaction in the social security box which was empty. The death certificate that Dave got from Debbie or a really of course didn't have the state certification because he was getting it directly from the town but instead of the handwritten file number it had a partial printed file number or three digits of which the last three digit of which did not correspond to the handwritten file number the copy I got was had the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the day or the day or the day or the day or the day or the day or that ship Retire and got the number of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name to the name of the name of the name of the name of doing names of the name of the name of the name of the name of the name of the I attached. The documents I usually evaluate for fabrication, alteration, and misre presentation, or financial contracts, affidavits, and exhibits entered with pleadings. As the client, Moonrock Books, was referred to me by an attorney that I have worked with on the foreclosure cases, I did not expect to find multiple, obviously altered versions of a child's death certificate. When I opened the email attachments provided for my initial examination, as an integral part of the written report, it has been my practice to provide a condensed history of events that warranted the document examination, which I examined documents after an action, as commenced, it has been my practice to include type of action, along with title and docket number in the introduction. At the time of drafting this report, I did not know, and given the content of the documents examined, chose not to inquire into the nature, nor even the venue of this action, until after completing my examination. On May 20, 2019, James Fetzer emailed a copy of the court's complaint filed in the action entitled Leonard Posner versus James Fetzer, Mike Palachek, Ronz Without Remedies, LLC, Dane County Circuit Court Case Number. 2018 CV003122. Now, I won't read every aspect of it, but I will read the following. No problem. Yeah. Go ahead. All exam and certificate is a death for Noah Posner. Noah Samuel Posner 86 had notable differences as do even the two printed images, both of which are purportedly attested to by register of vital records of Elizabeth through Galley and certified by the seal of the state of Connecticut through copies of a record file. The copies of this record bearing the state file number 2012-07-078033 are notably different in appearance. The most notable appearance difference of certified A true copy version 4, where there's a space between the A and the true is not the redaction is noted in the complaint to a certified A true, where the A and the true are side by side copy version 3. The most notable common feature of these exam and seal in boss, true copy of a record certificate is that the contents of the box in the lower right corner, which would be for a social security number. Along with the title, amen to some of the lines that appear to have been hand redrawn are notably absent from all of these state seal testifying true copies of filed records. Now here's what he writes about these four different versions version 1. The first exam in Connecticut certificate of death, COD-1, for Noah Samuel Posner, age 6 is a 132 kilobyte JPEG image. Boone Rock books did not have the original hard copy document that was used to create this image file, and this document was examined in the digital format as received. The most distinguishing feature of this document image are the gray background color, the three black marker lines that obliterate the internment location as recorded in boxes 29-30 and the allegedly titled box directly right of box 59, which would have been for social security. The dark black border that frames this image was obviously added to the document image as a sharp dark black of this line is inconsistent with the low resolution of the image of frames and it abruptly terminates what should be the continuation of paper, whole punch images on the left-printed edge. The greatest oddity of the image document is what appears to be part of the Connecticut state seal found directly below the written receipt for record date December 26, 2012 on a document that is obviously lacking the state file number. Now he's describing there the version that was given by Lenny to Kelly that I discussed in the book. Now it turns out that I apparently added that dark black border in one of the occasions that I copied it for the book, but I mean it doesn't affect the content otherwise. The second example of Connecticut certificate at COD2 for NOAA Samuel Pazrade 6 is a 1.7 megabyte JPEG image. Moonrock books do not have the original hard copy document that was used to create this image file and this document was examined in the digital format as received. The most distinguishing feature of this document is an image reporting that same Debbie O'Reilly House did certify this, a partial document containing changes as noted made on 614-13 to be a true copy of the original received for record on December 26, 2012 as this document contains Debbie O'Reilly, the pre-hyphenated name because she's now seems to have been married and now calls herself Debbie O'Reilly, a house did. So he's talking about this prior to the hyphenated name. The name of the registrar that received this record on December 26, 2012 and the name that appears at this location on the state certified copy containing the same certification are Debbie A. O'Reilly. This Debbie O'Reilly House did the section of the image also appears to contain the shadowy image of a registry stamp impressed upon this Debbie O'Reilly House did certification. There are strikeouts and corrections and boxes 12 and 22 is noted, that's for the rest as seen. And dated 614-13 at the top of the document image, appearing in the upper right hand corner of this image document, purporting to be a state file number are partial characters followed by the legible numbers 243. So this actually is the one that Dave got from Debbie. This number scheme is not compliant with the state of Connecticut file number and is found on the certified by a fixed embossed sealed copy and neither the number scheme nor the font of this number print matches the character font is found on reference copy examples. The lower portion of the December 26, 2012 handwritten date is obviously missing as is the lower printed portion of this document image. So that's the one Dave got from Debbie. Version 3. This would be the one attached to the complaint. The third examin Connecticut Certificate of Death, COD3 from NOAA Samuel Posner H6, is certified by the fixed date seal as a true copy actual record copy. The most disturbing attribute of this document is the embossed seal of the state of Connecticut Department of Public Health, affixed to certify that the above is a true where the words are joined together copy of the record file that has been recklessly altered and repaired in an attempt to conceal the act of alteration. That printed form content was removed is evidenced by the appearance in this location on version 4. He's got a whole bunch of copies with a highlighting different aspects of it. Another notable attribute is found on the left edge of the certification section of this document, sort of a COD3A, where Debbie A. Arraylie a registrar attested this is a true copy of the original receipt for the record. This marking differs in size from all other examin certificates. Listing December 14, 2012 is the actual or presumed date of death. This certificate notes the correction of boxes 12 and 22 as per father 61413 at the top of the document and certifies itself as a true copy of the original receipt for record and contains a receipt for record date of December 26, 2012. The handwritten number code of this, 2013 address corrected certificate, is consistent only in a numerical content with a mechanically applied state file number code is found on the examin certificates certified by the medical examin on December 16, 2012 and free received for the record on 1313 as mechanically stamped a state file number, 2012 07078019 and another certified by the medical examin on December 16, then received for record on 122112 mechanically stamped a state file number or so forth and so on. One would