Woolwich Fake Terror Attack

Video Transcript:

Besides, we're NIH and I Bloodthreaters4 for all our research friendly videos! In addition to GameCop, we've made great achievements with 8 of the Japanese switches. I'm joined today by Nick Colestrom and I'm in London and we're going to be talking about the incident which took place in Woolwich on the 22nd of May 2013, which stranger took place at 2.20pm. There was two perpetrators involved. One of them was aged 22 and they were called Michael Adabalajor and Michael Adabalawi just by coincidence. Okay, so this is where tragically a soldier has died and he's allegedly had his head cut off. So you think there's glaring inconsistencies in what the media have told us about this event, Nick involved someone getting knocked over by a car and then events took place after that just stopped or... Yes, this is a contrived fabricated event which is not what it seems and like other recent fabricated terror events in America, the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook, you've got actors involved and you don't have real deaths. That's the huge difference. The earlier fabricated terror events like the London bombings of 2005 and Madrid 2004 had real deaths and that was the whole point of them. That was why the public was out of gas and horrified and that was the point of fabricated terror. So had fake perpetrators but real victims? Real victims. Yeah, yeah. Here you've got what a skeptical American website called Vixen's simulated. There was a real death of this drummer fellow, dear, that's got him, DLR, drummer Lee Ruegby, who really died but not in the road. It's fairly clear that they're using his corpse and they're by eliciting real grief and horror from his family which carried the whole story and gave it credibility but the fellow did not die in that scene. Right. Because one important factor is there is no photograph or video showing a decapitated corpse. You can see a body lying in the road but it's not obvious whether there's even a head there or not. No imagery has been provided to provide proof of that. We've just gone purely by the mainstream narrative. Totally. Yeah. Okay. So just from the start, Nick, they're supposedly driving along on a car, the mount the pavement and then they're not over Lee Ruegby. Is that what allegedly happened? Supposedly. And the car ends inches from these two columns which are supporting a traffic notice and the whole front of the car is crumpled up which would have been a major impact crash to do that and the two people in the car would have been no state to just get out of it, let alone start hacking someone else to death. That can't the front being crumpled up next to these two pillars which are totally untouched. Scrutiny of those pillars shows that not in any way damaged, nothing impacted them. That tells you right of the start but it's a fabricated event that is a stage set prop right there. All right. We've also got inconsistencies with photographs of the body in the road with regards to the blood. Yeah. What happens is that the trailer blood starts from right on the other side of that those two posts foot or two from the front of the car and an overhead photo shows a trailer blood from there and to the road. So it's supposed to believe that in that corner of the pavement with trees overhead they're trying to hack his head off. They've suddenly got out of the meat kill you try to hack his head off. Well this is off the road they've tried to do this eventually. Yeah on the pavement. All right. Now that would have about eight pints of blood would have spurted out the done that I'd blood all of them so I was pretty good enough and the important thing is there's no blood on the pavement. We've got photographs of the front of the car which do not show that blood. The blood only appears from an overhead photo from a helicopter looking down that shows this trailer blood which has been put in on that photo. It's not there on ground shots. That's the important thing. Right. Okay. And they've then for some reason moved the body into the road. Well some reason why would you want to do that? If you get out it's totally senseless behaviour. Knock knock down someone who you've got nowhere of identifying or because he's walking away from you when you knock him down. You've got a tee shirt help the heroes. You've got nowhere of identifying who he is. You know the urge you happen to have a meat cleaver you get out you hack his head off. Why would you want to do that? And you then drag him out into the middle of the road. Makes absolutely no sense. His only sense it makes is there's a stage prop for public horror but the only way it makes sense. She think that Lee Rigby was already dead before he was knocked off. Correct. Yeah. The proof is that that body in the middle of the road has absolutely no blood around it. Right. You got witnesses which may or not may not be reliable saying they saw somebody hacking that that body in the middle of the road but there is no blood around that body. There was also people videoing events after this took place and the guy stood there with the meat cleaver in his hand supposedly with blood on his hand and the person is just calmly filming someone who's just hacked someone's head. Yeah. He's quite calm. He's not an any friendly as you would be if you'd done this brutal terrible murder. And let's point out that after this event they stand around for 20 minutes before the police arrive. So I would say they've been somehow programmed or conditioned to stand around and wait for the police. That's like their instruction to wait for the police to arrive. And while they do that they talk to people. People apparently come up and talk to them while they hold him and meet cleaver. This is where I think you've got actors on the stage. You have got actors in this drama and let's come back now. Let's come to what you're alluding to which I suspect was done at quite a different time. Perhaps a week before or something. This guy is talking to two cameras. There's two different cameras filming him. You got two different angle shots. So this fellow holding it. These are like foreign cameras. This kind of thing. Presumably. Yeah. Media. Right. So just ask yourself. If you had seen somebody hack someone's head off and you got blood on every's hands with a meat cleaver, would you stand there a few feet in front of him with a camera photograph for him and talking to him? Would you do? Of course you wouldn't. So that is an obviously stage event. And the dead giveaway here is the little old lady with a shopping trolley who walks past totally unconcerned as this apparent horror event is going on. And that tells you that red blood on the hand was photoshopped on. There was no red blood on the hands. And it's only on the hands. Not anyone else on his clothing. I was, would have happened if you didn't. Right now I think Nick in the mainstream media comments like that to people saying or there was blood added in afterwards. It's all been photoshopped, have been dealt with. What have mainstream said in order to back up there narrative that this blood being photoshopped and have they denied it or what are they saying? You mentioned Alex Jones before. Didn't you? Well, Alex Jones, I think one of the angles is that you see extra red, extra luminously red blood on the hands. And the red line on the side of the curb is highlighted. It's glowing. So they've enhanced the red and the whole picture to run like even redder. So in your opinion the blood was added. Yeah, yeah. It can't just be on the hands and nowhere else is put in. But it is holding a meat cleaver and somehow they wound him up. That guy was totally controlled, minimized. He's a product of MI5, British intelligence, to be in that situation talking to the camera. We'll come onto the claims of him having previous involvement with MI5, but I just want to stay on the evidence. It seems that there's so many flaws in this contrived event if that's indeed what it is. How is it that they can't stage these false flag operations so that we are fooled by them? I mean 9-11, that was many years before people started questioning it. This is a terrific masterpiece to have a guy with a meat cleaver, running at the camera. Well you said that you thought that might have been filmed a few weeks earlier. I do. I do. If it was, they've got a woman walk in pass with a shot and trolley. Yeah. Right. Is that not just blatant sort of in your face? We can't do this properly. Well they know the media will just put up with it and accept it. That's what the Illuminati or whatever you call them, the Vampire Elite. Know they can get away, know they can do that. Once they project the great powerful emotions, hate and fear, that blocks out the higher thought centres and you get a primitive logic and that is the level of which the story writes and is accepted. I mean that's the motivation for planning these kind of events and it's all sort of justify their actions in other parts of the world as well. But just to come back to the how poorly this seems to have been orchestrated in the plan, is it the case that they're even taunting people like you and people like me by making such a sloppy job of what they're doing so that we can easily see through it? Yeah. It seems that that could be delivered. Well Richard, certainly that's what Arun was saying with a Boston bombing story, the marathon. That was so such a crappy job. You could see all these lousy actors lying on the floor pretending to have been harmed by a bomb and fake blood splattered everywhere and on the other side of the road you can see all these guys are black hats and the skull logo. Now quite obviously the perpetrators. I would have thought that was the arch example of that. The story so badly made that it was falling apart. So they've done a very badly orchestrated false flag event in Boston, doubt they've done one in Wollwich in the UK? Well it is. It's for this to you. You've got the people who do see through these lies. People who actually critically analyze, look at the evidence and see if there's any mileage in what the mainstream is saying. Then unpick it and then we know it's all a fake event. It's easy to see. But then they've got the other group of people who will only believe what mainstream media say and they can say whatever they want. Do you think they're trying to draw a line between the two groups of people? The group of people who will only believe something if it's on the BBC and you've got people like you and me who will question everything that's on the BBC and only believe it if there's evidence of what they're saying. And by orchestrating these events so badly is that drawing a line between the two and separating the two groups to see what I mean to make them to create division because you go down the pub, people who can see through this and it's easy to see through it are annoyed. But then you've got other people laughing at them who will only believe the BBC. Do you think they're trying to create more of a division? Well possibly that's a bit complicated. A lot of people realise that the story doesn't make any sense at all at any level. But you've just got the prime or hate image of this guy with a red machete and apparently a corpse in the road. And although the actual photo does not show any corpse in the road and I could mention here that the corpse is in two very different positions on different photographs. Right. I think our businesses get people to think about these. You are getting delusion fabricated. The media are complicit and to fight against these agents of deception and delusion, pushing the world into war, trying to start World War 3. Our best way of doing that is to unwive these fabricated events. We've got to do the best we can to show people how this is made up and how they use, manipulate the deep emotions to prevent rational analysis. Right. Now okay let's just go back to the what happened because the two guys hung around for five minutes or longer and 20 minutes and 20 minutes and 20 minutes at the police arrived. So then what happened? Well supposedly there was a quote from actual local police saying we weren't consulted, we weren't called, we didn't recognise any of the people that actually arrived and we didn't recognise any of the people on the scene as locals. Okay. Then the police arrived and people said this isn't a real police car, it hasn't got the right ID and codes to be a real police car. This is some sort of special operations people who come and then there's the mirror, there's footage of a shootout that happened. Supposedly these guys are hanging around and chatting to people for 20 minutes. They were asking can you please film me, people on the bus saying look can you please film me. So they were programmed, they're having like programmed people. First of all you hang around here whether or not they did anything chopping the body, you try and get photographed, you try and get seen, you wait for the police to arrive. Then what do you do in the police arrive? You walk towards the police car. That's what they were, as if their programmes do that. Right. A witness said they did not shoot the police, they did not raise their hands by the size, they walked towards the police car, that's what they were now to do. Then they told the police shot them. Right. Okay. Okay. Now you said to me earlier that you don't think we will ever see any one of these guys giving an interview on camera. Well why is that landing? Yeah. I bet these two lads are silent now forever. This always happens when these patches are set up, Islamic fake terror patches that are given a role, they're set up into the role, they're fulfilled, and then there's silence, the rest of silence, and you just have media fabrication, you get the whittering of journalists, and the thing you really want to hear, the opinion of the guys in jail, what happened, you cannot ever get that. Right. I mean I tried that with one or two people involved in the London bombings, and you can't get them in jail. But presumably we're going to see a trial of these guys if they're still alive, and with the jury giving evidence, so the truth not come out there will not get their version of how it was contrived or not in a trial. Well we should do Richard, but that's my hunch that we won't hear anything. They'll concoct something such that they're not put on in a public trial. That would be insane. That's what I guess. Right, okay. Right now let's come onto this MI5 link because somebody alleged that the main perpetrator had had involvement with MI5 and was promptly arrested, is that right? Yeah, a close long time friend of his went into the BBC News Night studio and told the story of how he was hassled by MI5 and he went back home to Michael Adty Balanjo. He went back home to Kenya trying to get away from it all and found it's even worse there. Not only was he tortured, but he was also sexually molested and he then came back to London. So he was entrapped. He kind of felt there was no escape from this and somehow he looked like a controlled being and I personally believe in pain drug hypnosis whereby they put some under drugs at our conscious level and you then give commands as to what they're going to do and that is an activated at a certain scene. Now you mentioned earlier Nick, the Kent Freedom Movement. I've got some videos on their website about this event. Just tell us what those videos are. Oh well I think that they show very well aspects of the fakery involved and for example there's a very blurred image that the mirror puts out, a mirror website whereby you can see people, various shady figures coming out from the car to put this body in the middle of the road and you see this process going on but various figures are involved and it looks as if that body has still got a head when it's put out in the middle of the road. That's an example and there are various witnesses, certain witnesses, that they expose them as being actors. Now you also mentioned Barack Obama made a speech a few days after this event. It was a very day after he made a long speech, very important in which he was trying to say that he wanted to close Gunn Tana Mabay and he didn't really like killer drones striking in other countries as if he was trying to reign in both these things but rather like the powers of Dusa and I think he had to mention this London terror incident the day before and I feel that was planted there to make sure they didn't back out from the war on terror and keep him on track. So it's possibly been ordered from across the pond and this event maybe or you think they're the kind of one on the same entity? Yeah I think they're one on the same entity and you get here a big campaign for the Save the Heroes, Save the Heroes two-shirt or campaign that happened the week after synchronized with this event. So I think it's both sides of the pond that what I call the Axis of Evil which is dedicated to everlasting war and that is the British and American terror intelligence services they organize these kind of events. Right and do you think there's going to be more events in the UK like this? I know it's an impossible question but was the first time that terror returns to the UK for quite a while and it reaffirms the basic theme of Islamic terror which they haven't felt needed reinforcing. So you know that you said that some of the newer more recent fake events are not only the perpetrators are not only fake but the victims are sometimes fake now as well and if that's the case they haven't got all of they haven't got lots of angry relatives wanting trials etc so it's easy to get away with. What about the parents of Lee rugby? Would they not be wanting to get to the bottom of what really happened and would they not be seeing this? Well they totally believe it. They absolutely believe that their summer is killed as the media described. But would they not want to be at a trial with these two guys in the dock being questions and cross-examined to try and get to the truth? See what I'm saying. So there is still parents grieving parents of the victim albeit we don't think that he died there he was probably killed before and placed there. That's what you view of the suspect isn't it? Well I think we need to follow the trial closely. And he does come out like that. And just one other thing that you mentioned also the coroner the cause of death. Yeah. Yeah immediately after there was an in-quest with the coroner's giving the commos of death or rather refusing to state that DLR was how DLR was killed. They would not make any statement about the cause of death. That was immediately after the event and then some days later when the 22-year-old accomplice went on trial which he just started. That was evidently not sufficient and the papers reported that the cause of death was multiple injuries which again if someone has had head chopped off you're not going to say the cause of death was multiple injuries. He said totally non-comical statement from the medics concerned. Okay well it'll be interesting to see if there is a trial the public trial was a jury but thanks very much for speaking to us about it today Nick. Just remind us of your website because you've got quite a long article about this on your site. I'll turn it on the tube.co.uk and also the Kent Freedom Movement of God as you say videos as well. Okay. Thanks very much Nick.