Why did NYPD search Epstein Island? NYPD Leverage.

Video Transcript:

Do you think these memos are part of the evidence that a prosecutor, Robert Mueller, or somebody else, should be considering when determining the president's intent? It's my recollection that is the evidence that will be used if there was ever a proceeding. These would be to show that I wrote it down at the time, sort of the bolster, the credibility of my recollection. James Cromy talking about the memos that were released to Capitol Hill. Now there is Inspector General Report we can confirm into how he handled those memos and whether they were classified at the time. At the same time, the Democratic Party has filed a lawsuit and they are suing this list of people. Donald Trump Jr. Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Jared Kushner, Rick Gates, the Russian government, the Donald Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and George Papadopoulos. All those people named in the DNC lawsuit and even some Democrats on Capitol Hill having an issue with that. I actually think this lawsuit is ill-conceived and I am not very supportive of it. I think we have a very serious criminal activity underway in this country by the Russians and possibly by those within the Trump campaign. And to make this political is actually the wrong thing to be doing. I am not interested in a political tip for tat. I am interested in getting to the truth and if there is criminal conduct that has been engaged in holding people accountable. Okay, with that, there is a start with the DNC. Some people saying this is a fundraising gambit, others saying this is an effort to get people to be deposed and continue this thing even if these investigations wrap up. How do you see it? It is the dumbest political move I have seen in a long time because it makes it all about politics. Those of us who go on TV every day and explain that this whole investigation with Russia is a canard and it is about the Democrats making politics. The DNC just confirmed it and the irony of this is, Trey Gowdy said earlier on Fox is the irony of that is if anybody has a beef on collusion and rigging something, it is Bernie Sanders with what the DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz did with that nominating process. I can't get inside their heads to see what their motivation was but as a Republican, it is pretty stupid. Within, well you share that opinion with the president of the United States. So within the past few minutes, actually seven minutes ago, he just tweeted out, just heard the campaign was sued by the obstructionist Democrats. This can be good news in that we will now counter for the DNC server that they refuse to give to the FBI. The Wendy Wasserman Schultz servers and documents held by Pakistani mystery man and Clinton emails. Debbie, I am sure he is talking about Debbie Wasserman Schultz but the president obviously weighing in saying that they will go after the Democrats for all of that. One of the memos he says this. I explained that he could count on me to always tell him the truth talking to the president there. I said I don't do sneaky things. I don't leak. I don't do weasel moves. Obviously he leaked those memos to his friend and now there is an IG investigation whether those memos contain classified information. Right. And he didn't tell the president that this sex stuff, the dossier, was funded by the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign and his political opponents. And obviously Jim Comey went before Congress and in two different topics in two separate months, sequential months gave different answers to whether or not the president put political pressure on him to open or shut the investigation on Mike Flynn. The problem with Jim Comey is that he has an amazing lack of how he is coming across to the American people. He lacks so much credibility and I think these memos do nothing, nothing to add anything to his side of the equation that somehow the president was acting inappropriately. Well, Democrats say they show that he has the same thoughts as he has now and he wrote it down extremely late at the time. They liked it. Democrats in Congress. All right. Two occasions he gave different testimony in May of 17 that he gave in June of 17. He's got to deal with Congress on that. All right. Let's see if I can get this one. House committee chairs. Matt, Gowdy and Nunez on the Comey memos, they write this. The memos also show former director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. He never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation. The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe on multiple occasions. He in his own words defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe. We got to get into something else because you know, stuff is happening while we're on air. Yes, honey? Yeah. We, I happen in front of me, a letter that was drafted by 11 House Republicans. They've sent this letter to the Department of Justice and the FBI. They are requesting a criminal investigation of you, director Comey, as well as Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, FBI agents, Peter Struck and FBI counsel Lisa Page. And it appears that they are alleging potential violations of the law regarding the Clinton and Trump investigation. They're arguing that your decision not to seek charges against Clinton for her use of a private email server suggests an improper investigative conduct potentially motivated by a political agenda. And they are also saying that you leaked classified information. And they refer to the seven memos you wrote about your conversations with the president. I have a response. I'm sorry to make that on you. I know, I'm struggling today, but I haven't read it. I don't know what to make of it. It seems they've been saying that stuff since the Clinton email investigation. A whole lot of that's already being looked at by the Inspector General Department of Justice, which is a very good thing. And I don't have any other reaction. The accusations are not true. I should have said that first, but that's OK. Well, you're in good companies. A lot of people on there. Yeah. But look, I have confidence in the institution of the Inspector General. And maybe they'll, on the Clinton email investigation, maybe they'll criticize me. Maybe they won't, but whatever they do, I believe in that institution. They hold people accountable. And that's the way it should be. It shouldn't be done by tweet or letters. Let's let the institution do its work. Well, let me criticize you on the Clinton investigation. Because you said that you reopened the investigation into Hillary's private email server 11 days before the election. Because quote unquote, I was operating in a world where Hillary Clinton was going to beat Donald Trump. Now, should the FBI have taken it upon himself on yourself to guess who was going to win? I mean, that seems out of your purview. Like, you know, I'm listening to polls. And therefore, this is how I'm going to behave. That doesn't sound right to me. Yeah. That was what I did. I would have that same concern. What I explained in the book is I intentionally did not consider polls. In fact, one of my very best people, a woman in the General Counsel's office, asked me, should you consider that what you're about to do may help elect Donald Trump president? Yeah. And I said, great question, but not for a moment. Because down that path lies the death of the FBI as an independent force. If we ever start considering whose fortunes will be affected in what way, where that comes from in the book is, I'm trying to be tough on myself in the book and ask, could you have implicitly, even though you don't, you intentionally didn't consider it, could it have shaped you in some way? And the answer is, of course, it could have. It wouldn't change the decision. I faced two terrible options. I could speak about restarting the investigation in a huge way. Or I, in my view, could conceal that? Which do I choose of those? Speaking would be really bad. Concealing would be catastrophic. And so I choose the least bad option. But not because if Donald Trump had been up 20 points in the polls, the framing would be the same and the choice would be the same. Eric Prince found her blackwater and former Navy SEAL. And I want to give color on why the FBI, why Komi had to do that last week. Yeah, please do. Because of we, because of weener gates and the sexting scandal, and NYPD was the first one to look at that laptop. NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, they were warned. They searched his laptop and sure enough found those 650,000 emails. They found more stuff than just the more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing. They found state-part of the email. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sext island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times. The amount of garbage that they found in these emails of criminal activities by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other democratic members of Congress was so disgusting, they gave it to the FBI. And they said, we're going to go public with this. If you don't real investigation, you don't do the right thing with timely indictments. I believe I know. And this is from a very well placed source of mine at one P.P. one police classo in New York. NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrest they were making in this investigation. And they've gotten huge pushback to the point of coercion from the justice department, the justice department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the the accidental heart attack death of Eric Connor, the guy almost two years ago. In fact, the level of pushback, the Obama justice department is doing again, actually seeking justice in these email and other related criminal matters. Weir and Huma Abedin, his wife, the closest advisor of Hillary Clinton for 20 years, have both flipped. They are cooperating with the government. They both have, they see potential jail time of many years for their crimes. So NYPD first gets that computer. They see how disgusting it is. They keep a copy of everything and they pass the copy onto the FBI, which finally pushes the FBI off, you know, off their chairs, making call me, reopen that investigation, which was indicated in the letter last week. The point being, NYPD has all the information and they will pursue justice within their rights if the FBI doesn't. And there is all the criminal culpability through all the emails they've seen of that 650,000, including money laundering, underage sex, pay for play, and of course, you know, plenty of proof of inappropriate handling, sending receiving of class by the information up to that level, special access programs. Oh, it seems like there seems to be incredible factionalization, not just in the FBI, but in the NYPD as well, and whether to pursue these things, when to pursue them, how hard to pursue them. The FBI can investigate, but they can't convene a grand jury. They can't file charges, okay? The prosecutors, the justice department has to do that. Now, as I understand it, Priet Bahara, the Manhattan prosecutor, has gotten the hold of some of this. And from what I hear, he's a stand-up yet, if people are willing to bend or break the law and don't really care about the constitution or do process, and if you're willing to use Stalinist tactics against someone, who knows what level of pressure the justice department is trying to run out the clock to elect Hillary Clinton to prevent any real justice from being done. What I understand up to the commissioner, or at least the chief level of NYPD, they wanted to have a press conference in DOJ. Washington people, political appointees, have been exerting all kinds of undue pressure on them to, you know that if the left had emails pointed Donald Trump being involved in an under-e visiting multiple times, in Ireland with under-age sex slaves, basically emails. You know they'd be talking about it and they'd be shouting it from the rooftops. And this kind of evil, this kind of true dirt on Hillary Clinton, and you look, you don't have to make any judgments, just release emails, just dump them, let them out there, let people see the light of truth. This is stuff coming right off a hard drive that was owned by weir and his wife, Umaddin, either these closest advisors for the last 20 years. This is not from, this is not from some hacker, and he also says they laptop seized from the warrant, right, criminal investigation. It was, it was a horrific, um, it was used as a sort of a tool by, in my opinion, by the Obama administration to basically sever the country in half and um, continue the anti-police sentiment. And it was a horrible tragedy. Nobody wants anyone to pass away in a situation like that. But the fact that it was, it appears it was used as leverage to conceal what was found on that laptop. And the fact that there was clearly some sort of a battle going on between the NYPD, the NYFBI and the Justice Department at the highest levels for McCabe admonishes the NYFBI for leaks, his leaks. Yep. Several times. It's disgusting. It's disgusting. Yeah, he leaked information and then run back and reprimand other agents because that information was leaked. And, and the other thing that that, you know, just is disgusting conduct, completely lacking in any sort of integrity whatsoever is that these guys inside of the Justice Department, inside of, you know, their internal investigators were investigating other leaks. And then this one came up. So they started investigating this internally, separately from the actual IG's office, who were at the time investigating the Peter Strach Lisa page text messages. So McCabe's being questioned by the INSD, I believe it is inside of the department about this. They think he's a victim. They're like, he says, I have no idea how this happened. I don't know. I talk to a few people about it. It's a horrible thing that it happened. They make him initial the article from the Wall Street Journal that was in question. And then they sent him a sworn statement for him to sign saying, basically, I'm not sure how this happened and all this stuff they were interviewed on. And he ignores it for a month. They sent it back to him again, but accidentally sent it to someone else. He responds to that email by saying, you have my email address wrong. This is my email address. But never, you know, acknowledges the the statement that's attached to the email. And then when they, when they talk to Lisa Page and Lisa Page says he told me to leak this to the Wall Street Journal, they go back into his office and say, let's re-question you about this. He, he ponies up and tells the truth. And then they're like, we've been poking around in here, trying to figure out who leaked this information in your department of what's supposed to be like trusted, upstanding individuals, looking for who did this. And it was you the entire time. We've spent nights and weekends on this case. And it was you. And he said, like, they explained it. Like, he looked down and said, yeah, I know. I'm sorry. Like that. Exactly. And what you're referring to, what Tracy's referring to is the larger findings of the inspector general, the report that was issued that written in February 2018 released last week, the McCabe leaking and then denying it, then finally fessing up to it. That's what you're referring to in that, in that, in that, uh, uh, yeah. Okay. All right. All right. And then spun off from that just to be clear because we're talking about a couple of different things here. So everyone, everyone understood that it was very simple. Everyone understood the McCabe-Lide period, the lack of candor BS. It's the, he lied. He lied twice. He lied three times and got caught in it. And of course, um, that's what the IG's report was. And by the way, this is the first rip of many, uh, from the IG, the entire report, IG's report, I believe, is expected in May. So, but, but from that, when you, when you were looking at that document, you saw, wait a minute here. Well, Garner's name, and again, Garner refers to Eric Garner, the man who died in 2014 at the hands of NYPD and how that fits in the things. And we get. So basically inside of this, um, while McCabe is on the phone, what they call a hastily convened conference call with Loretta Lynch and the director of the New York field office of the FBI in the I OIG report, it says that they had a very, you know, kind of heated conversation about the leaks that were coming out of the New York field office. And in regards to the case of Eric Garner and Loretta Lynch, McCabe said had never used stronger language. So on September 28, 2016, McCabe is made aware of information that they found regarding Hillary Clinton on Anthony's weiner, Anthony weiner's laptop in an unrelated sex encase they're investigating. So basically, the NYPD comes across all these emails on, uh, weiner's laptop and they go to the FBI with the information and they find a whole bunch of other stuff on there as well. And McCabe, amongst other atrocities, sits on the information for an entire month before there begins to be some unrest within the police department like what's going on here with the FBI is like what's going on here. Um, the agents on staff, um, at the NYPD and the FBI, they get rustless about what's on the computer and how come it's not being investigated and something's not being done. On October 24, 2016, uh, Loretta Lynch swaps out the federal investigative team that's looking into the officers who were responsible for the Eric Garner case. And so she takes the team from the federal government that's looking for criminality on the part of these police officers in accidentally killing Eric Garner and she swaps them out with a new team and the news reports at that time that it's likely because they're not finding anything in terms of prosecutatory, you know, action and they want, they want to bring a case forward against the officers. A Staten Island grand, a Staten Island grand jury separately had heard this and failed to indict any of the officers for any crimes. The federal government took over and this was the investigation that was swapped, you know, she swapped the team out on. It was a heated thing for the New York police department and it was used as kind of like a national beacon of race relations and, and the police between, you know, um, black individuals. No small matter, especially at that time. That's right. Yeah, it was massive. It really was. Um, in the OIG report on McCabe's leaks to the World's Street Journal, it states that on October 26, which is two days after she swapped this team out, um, McCabe and the New York director of the FBI participate in again, a hastily convened conference call with Loretta Lynch, who delivers the same message about leaks, but focuses on leaks in the Eric Garner case. And I was like, that doesn't make any sense. So it's very interesting. She'd even be on the call and it's very interesting that they're admonishing the FBI in New York for leaks, especially if they're supposed to be about the World's Street Journal article. And later noted in the report, the officers in New York are like, we don't even know the stuff that you, you know, the stuff that leaked. We would have no way of knowing that anyway. Why are you blaming us for it? Yeah, basically, they're saying, what the hell are you talking about? Yeah, they're, they're coolest. Okay. Okay. Yeah. So the same day is that call, the 26th. Rudy Giuliani is on Fox News and all of the MSM floating like some big October surprise that's supposed to come out in the next few days. And so to recap, McCabe and Lynch are admonishing the New York field office about leaks they didn't make while talking about Garner. And two days after that call, Jim Colmy sends his letter to Congress announcing that they're reopening the Clinton email investigation. So obviously there's some leverage here like the police are and the FBI are saying, we know what's on this laptop and you guys better do something about it. Otherwise, we're going to go public with this stuff. And that's what Eric Prince was basically saying. So we'll get to Eric Prince. On November 1st, McCabe recused himself from anything having to do with anything Clinton, the foundation, investigation, email investigation, any of it. And then Eric Prince goes on the radio. I believe it was the fourth. The fourth. Yep. On bright part news. November 4th. So he goes on bright part news. And he's talking, he's asked a question about state secrets being stolen by foreign governments. And he says, you know, I want to talk about what's on the weiner in a separate case in the weiner laptop. And in the very beginning of that interview, he says that the blowback they're getting from main justice about, you know, investigating and inditing on what's on that laptop has been so massive. And as a matter of fact, he says they're using the Eric Garner case as like a blackmailing tool. And he says that. So not even a week after we now know for facts from the OIG that there was this conversation between Lynch McCabe and the FBI in New York where they admit in the OIG report they talk about Eric Garner. We have Eric Prince on an interview saying the cops told me a very well pleased source told me that they were threatening. They were threatening them with the Eric Garner case. Should they do anything about this? The NYPD was going to release this information from the whom Obidine Anthony Weiner laptop and other devices to if if the justice was not going to do it, they were going to do it independently. Lynch comes in, essentially you do that, your families are toast. You can you can you can you can find them in the East River. And in the course of Eric Prince had basically said the same thing except not so colorful. And that's what that's what the OIG report suggests the threats that in context. This literally was a the only reason why the OIG actually ended up investigating McCabe on this leak. This is only about one leak. This is not about anything else. This this report. The only reason why they ended up investigating him on this. They were already investigating putting him under oath and everything on different topics in their main report. But when the INSD inside of the FBI that was doing the investigation internally to figure out who was leaking realized it was McCabe their boss who was doing the leaking. They couldn't investigate him anymore. So they had to hand it off to the inspector general who was already asking him questions about the struck texts. And it's in there too. They talk about this in the page struck text. It says. Looks like they found something other than emails on Weiner's laptop looks like he's having a relationship with a minor in in so many words. So these are all like it's all a big web. And I was like thank god a government you know agency actually doing the right thing with a report. Now they have no prosecutorial power. So it's up to you know discretion who does what with it right. So they just they prepare the report. They forward it to the right people. And then those people have to take action on it. Which is why it makes me feel really good that there is a US attorney working in tandem with Harowitz on this OIG report in Utah. And that would be John Hubert. Yeah. Excuse me. And he's been working now for a number of months just disclosed here a month or so month or so ago. And that would expand the the reach of the IG to those outside or you know having retired a quid or otherwise moved on from the Department of Justice and FBI. So this is phenomenal. And and Hubert can also get into the and Tracy let me ask you if this is your understanding. Sally Yates had played up a wall. Folks understand this Department of Justice has numerous divisions. One of them is the National Security Division. That was headed up by McCord and Carlin. Yates Sally Yates was the person who said there will be no inspector general oversight within the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. Hubert by coming in working with with Horowitz now kind of circumvents that fictitious wall or that that wall that was put up by Yates. Is that can you verify that? Yes. I'm pretty sure. Yes. I'm pretty sure that's absolutely right. Yeah. And you know, they're not limited to just current employees anymore either. The US attorney functions just like a special prosecutor would basically except they're not independent in the government. So the US attorney can do it is same exact thing that a special counsel can really the reason why the little point is special counsel like a Mueller is because they feel like there would be some kind of conflict of interest that would disallow a government attorney from doing an honest investigation with no conflict. Picking Mueller doesn't really make much sense in that context given where he's been. But that's typically why a special prosecutor would be assigned to a case rather than using a US attorney. Just for context correct me if I'm wrong. There was no US attorney in the Benghazi scandal. There was no US attorney in the fest and furious scandal. There was no US attorney assigned to any other of the IG investigations that had come out. So that's something to kind of be happy about I guess. Correct. Correct. I think that's a very good I don't know. Very good observation. And I think something that we can look at in anticipation of the IG's report that will come out with who we're being or who we're being part of this. So yeah, absolutely. On November 1, 2016, Hillary and Bill Clinton and their entourage of assistance affected a civilian coup. In contrast to the usual concept of a coup where the military is involved and takes over the White House and communication centers very much like the scenarios you see in a movie, this coup was done silently and very effectively through two methods, corruption and co-optation. The Clintons have been involved in co-opting our White House, our judiciary, our CIA, our federal Bureau of Investigation, our attorney general, Loretta Lynch, and our Director of the FBI, James Coming for some time now. What they've done is to make sure that they were part and parcel of a group of people who were interrelated through political cronism. However, in order to stop this coup, we in the intelligence community and others involved have informally gotten together and with their permission, I am beginning to announce that we've initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. What has happened in effect when Coming had to open up the case of Hillary Clinton and discuss the emails that were involved with Anthony Weiner case, it was not the case itself that was as important as the fact that this was the entree for many of us in the counter coup to say to the administration, we have your number. Not only do we have your number, we're going to stop you from making Hillary the president of the United States and at the same time we will convict and indict the president of the United States, Loretta Lynch and many others who were involved in the cover-up of the massive corruption that occurred under the Clinton Foundation. Now in both cases, their coup was silent and our counter-coup was silent and it was all transgressed or occurred on the internet and this is probably the first time in the history of any country where a coup was initiated on through the internet and a counter-coup was initiated through the internet. I am just a small part of something far bigger than myself. It was the brave men and women who were in the FBI, the CIA, the director of intelligence, the military intelligence and men and women in 15 other intelligence organizations who were sick and tired of seeing this corruption in the White House and the Justice Department and in the intelligence system and we decided that there was something we had to do in order to save the republic. So we initiated a counter-coup through Julian massage who's been very brave and really quite formidable in his ability to come forth and provide all the necessary emails that we gave to him in order to undermine Hillary and Bill Clinton. Again, America, we're going through a major, major transition and quite frankly a second American revolution. We do not have guns, we do not have weapons, we do not intend to kill anybody, we do not intend to harm anybody. But we, the American public and those of us who serve as veterans and in the intelligence service like myself will stop the Clintons from assuming power that they don't deserve. At the same time, we will make certain that Obama leaves without any trail of pardon or any other act of treason. In effect, we want a peaceful transition in this great American republic. I bring you this news and I want you to understand what has happened. A moment of history is occurring right now in front of us and I'm proud to explain it to you.