Vaccines - Did They REALLY Save Us? Pt2. POLIO: A History of Hype & Hysteria

Video Transcript:

The war is on. While MSM is peddling guilt to anyone who doesn't toe the measles bad, MMR good party line, it seems that it makes no difference how many victims of the MMR vaccine you pull up. Ted Babies, 100 parents at an autism now conference, 500 parents waiting outside of a congressional hearing to speak. Dr. Tony Bark, explaining how epigenetics makes it so when size does not fit all when it comes to vaccines, Dr. Holtzrop showing us how doctors have no idea how vaccines actually work. Or whatever of the thousands of powerful testimonies, sciences, and court rulings in favor of the vaccine injured, none of this seems to make waves in the minds of people who are panicking with a recent measles outbreak because they believe that vaccines saved us. In fact, this belief that vaccine saved us is so strong that little to nothing can penetrate this deep viscerally and primally ingrained respect for the history of science, quote, unquote, we were given, but never really took a deeper look at before. What happens when you inspect the claim and really look at the facts and timelines as they happened is the status of savior merited by the historical facts or does it prove to be more of a myth? To answer that question, we need to go back to the beginning, line the facts up and see for ourselves if the narrative supports itself and its claims. We need to revisit the origins of smallpox and polio, the mother of all vaccine goddesses. There are three kinds of lies, lies, damn lies, and statistics, Mark Twain. Cancer was practically unknown until the cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. I have seen 200 cases of cancer and never saw case in an unvaccinated person. WB Clark, New York Times, 1909. Already published reports as well as our own observations indicate that smallpox vaccinations sometimes produces manifestations of leukemia. In children and adults observed in the clinics of Cricow, smallpox vaccination has been followed by violent local and general reactions and by leukemia. Julianne Alexandralix, polio. Listen now to the voice of the world's leading vaccine expert, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, chief of the Merc Pharmaceutical Company's Vaccine Division, relayed this problem he was having with imported monkeys. He best explains the origin of AIDS, but what you are about to hear was cut from any public disclosures. And I think that vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th century. Fifty years ago when Maurice Hilleman was a high school student in Miles City, Montana, he hoped he might qualify as a management trainee for the local JC Penne Store. Instead, he went on to pioneer more breakthroughs in vaccine research and development than anyone in the history of American medicine. Among the discoveries he made at Merck are vaccines for mumps, rubella and measles. Tell me how you found SB 40 in the polio vaccine? Well, that was a Merck thing. Yeah, I came to Merck and I was going to develop vaccines. We had wild viruses in our station, remember the wild monkey kidney viruses and so forth. And I finally, after six months gave up, I said that you cannot develop vaccines with these damn monkeys. We were finished. And if I can't do something about it, I'm going to quit. I'm going to try it. So I went down to see Bill Mann at the zoo in Washington, DC. And I told Bill Mann, I said, look, here's a, I got a problem. I don't know what the hell would do. Bill Mann is a real bright guy. I said, these lashing monkeys are picking it up while being stored in the airports in Transipitese loading off loading. He said, very simply. He said, you go ahead, get your monkeys out of West Africa. Get the African green, bring them into Madrid, on-load them there. There are no other traffic through there for animals. Why them in the Philadelphia pick them up or fly them into New York and pick them up right off the airplane? So I brought African greens. I didn't know we were importing AIDS virus at the time. And I was, you were going to do States virus to the country. I was, you were going to do States virus to the country. I was, you were going to do States virus to the country. You came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came, you came to中國, time because that was what your dad didn't worry about these wildfires. So you discovered it wasn't being inactivated in the salt back there? Right. So then the next thing you know is three or four weeks after that and I found that there were tumors popping out of these hamsters. Despite AIDS and leukemia suddenly becoming pandemic from wild viruses, Hilleman said this was good science at that time. Millions of Russians were supposed to get the contaminated lots of polio vaccines that had the SV cancer causing virus 40 in it. And yet according to the excellent nonfiction novel Dr. Mary's monkey that talks about a, he reads like a true crime detective novel takes place right here in New Orleans and it overlaps the Kennedy assassination, the murder of a doctor, a secret laboratory in New Orleans right next to the children's hospital that had a particle beam accelerator to do these cancer causing monkey virus experiments that are tied to Lee Harvey Oswald, JFK assassination and the emerging global epidemics. True story, I have not been able to debunk a single thing based on the history that is here, including talking to the electricians that worked on the building that held the particle beam accelerator that fried Dr. Mary. It was after reading Dr. Mary's monkey that I realized why I never met my grandmother who died of breast cancer, who was in the same percentage of the population who ended up getting breast cancer after receiving the polio vaccine. That was handed out to not just Russians but Americans and allies as well, including my grandmother and countless others. Many here voice a silent view that the sulking Sabin vaccine made of monkey kidney tissue has been directly responsible for the major increase in leukemia in this country. Polio was nearly eradicated until Jonas saw a creative vaccine that has caused every case since. Sure, well partially, well, what we have been living with polio for millennia? Why is it all of a sudden that the polio bug became a nuisance to humanity? That changed. In a great exposé article by Age of Autism, Daily Web newspaper for the Autism Epidemic, called Pesticides and the Age of Polio, we learn of a very interesting other side of history that is for whatever strange reason completely neglect of the narrative. Now you cannot just take things in a vacuum. You have to look at the environment and epigenetics has shown us this. What we're seeing is that at the same time, ironically enough, going back to Boston, where a French gypsy moth was set free to by accident, by a collector of insects from all over the world, and it was particularly hard to control this pest. The regular methods of pest control were ineffective and the town of Boston became plagued with this pest. They started using lead and arsenic as a pesticide for pest control and it worked so well that they decided to continue the use of this and export this use of pesticide, the lead arsenic mixture in particular and put it into the apple orchards. In the moral, people were scared of the polio bug later on. The more people sprayed these pesticides, first, the lead arsenic compound, second, the DDT later on, whose use would be sporadically used in different parts of the world to the detriment of the people in the area of the world. Well, what does lead arsenic do and what does DDT do? But destroys some of the neural sheath matter that is vital to protecting our neurological integrity. While thus compromised, the polio bug is able to interact with us in a way not either to seen before. And hence, the people that sprayed the most were the ones who were the most disappointed by the results or like there are of the spraying in regards to protecting them from the polio virus. And this is also why those getting the live virus, if they were contaminated with heavy metals, would be the ones that would die as a Dr. Oshner, who vaccinated his grandson and other family to try and prove to the world that the live virus was safe, only to kill one and give polio to the other and endure. That is why the live virus would take out so many people and then discontinued the use in the United States. But it is used overseas, such as in both Gates, polio vaccine. See the places in the world that had polio persisting, where there were a few cases of wild polio, where there were heavy metal issues, such as the World Health Organization digging into an arsenic reserved by accident while digging into a water supply in the Afghanistan, Pakistan region, which is the last stronghold of the polio, the wild polio. When it wasn't really a stronghold, there was just a few cases which have been since then superseded by cases of unexplained paralysis. Some of them, polio from the polio vaccine, it's not called polio, if you get paralysis from the polio vaccine. And another little dirty trick they did in regards to polio, because polio was coming down in parts of the world where the vaccine had not yet been introduced as sanitation, as pesticides moved on and evolved away from what we need to be dangerous. And yet some people will blame malaria, epidemics that killed people on the not-nures of the DDT, though withdrawing of the DDT, but like we said earlier, the bad houses were very good at managing the mosquitoes that caused malaria and could have been employed with greater frequency across the board. But since it's not profitable to find a cure, and it's better to keep people in a diseased state, as the FDA actually used to be the Bureau of Chemistry, and this is something that is missing from the narrative of peoples, they are not aware of the origins of the pharmacokemical complex. And there was a great hijacking that took place in the field of medicine, which was an open field where people could practice medicine, and patients would be patient while they practiced it. But wisdom came around in different forms and different modalities. I mean, if we can learn from primitive peoples about the methods of inoculation and call that good enough for modern science, surely there were some other methods that could be, well, we had to go bloodletting, but that was an allopathic medicine. The problem is that the FDA used to be the Bureau of Chemistry, and the Bureau of Chemistry's job was to lend limited liability to the petrochemical industry, as it was trying to find reasons and causes to sell itself to people and has a medicine. But the true health is not the killing of poison, there's not the cutting of death, there's not just these things dealing in death and destruction of tissue. True medicine is the restoration of cellular damage and DNA damage and destruction through cellular regeneration, and that cannot be done through chemicals, that just cannot be done through chemicals, period. Only fruits and vegetables and herbs, and the right nutrients and minerals can restore the person's health, allow for the body's own self-healing mechanism to be brought forth, and there are things that we do when we have measles, we take vitamin A that reduces the mortality drastically. But we've done visit videos on the measles, so we recommend that you check out our measles, mania, and narrative as well, but here we just want to dispel the myth that we were saved by something. Now, not only was all this done, but at the time of the release of the vaccine, at the same time, the polio vaccine, the polio itself, the polio bug, the polio illness, that which was classified under polio, the umbrella known as polio, got further defined and a couple diseases were relabeled, namely, aceptic meningitis and coxacol virus were recorded as polio prior to 1955, prior to the cell vaccine being released. And after 1955, polio, aceptic meningitis and coxacu virus infections are recorded as separate diseases. This led to an immediate decline as the categorization was further delineated. So the anti-vaccinists are those who have found some motive for scrutinizing the evidence. Generally the very human motive of vaccinal injuries or fatalities in their own families or in those of their neighbors, whatever their motive. They have scrutinized the evidence to some purpose. They have mastered nearly the whole case. They have knocked the bottom out of a grotesque superstition. The public at large cannot believe that a great profession should have been so perseveringly in the wrong. Charles Cretan M.A.M.D., 1889. This dance true today. All the victims, all the numbers, all the math, all the stories, all the science on the table or at pseudoscience and junk science and you can throw it out. Or first and on your own kids. But don't you tell me what I'm doing with mine, especially since I know my history. I'm not an anti-vaccer. I'm an ex-vaccer. I'm a currently informed individual who's not afraid to take this conversation all the way and I challenge a single pro-vaccer who is unconvinced. I don't believe me. Go out there and do your own darn research. Because at the end of the day, the life you save may be your own. The vaccine agenda is not going to stop unless we do something. Unless we're like Poland who met in the streets for eight days by the millions saying, hell no, we don't want your mandatory vaccines. When it's upon you, it will be. It will be very hard to buck the police when they come knocking at your door. So I strongly recommend you get informed. You move past the visceral fear of the vaccine lies in the vaccineist agenda and that you start acknowledging the victims, all of the victims because we're not going away and we're growing in number and you're not scaring us with your threats when we know what's at stake. Uphole the Nuremberg Code. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Good morning. My name is Dr. Tony Barg. I'm a licensed MD in the state of Illinois. I trained in pediatrics and rehab medicine on a ran-unemergency room, pediatric emergency room in the inner city. During that time, I witnessed several children after being in the vaccine clinic coming to the emergency room and set a sepulopticist with asthma, even respiratory arrest. That was a while ago. Since that time, we've had an emerging field called epigenetics, which is the field of looking at the link between genetics and environmental toxins affecting people individually. These are not safe and effective for everyone. This cannot be a one-size-fits-all. Not everyone has the same risk factors. But in the last 20 to 30 years, we have elucidated some things that are known as risk factors and they're called single nucleotide polymorphic variants. These interface with things like drugs and vaccines very differently for different people. This is not a one-in-a-million type of issue. There can be maybe up to 10 to 15 percent of people that are quite susceptible to different vaccines. These are a minority, a susceptible minority, who are being left out in the rain without an umbrella. If you can document with videotapes or photographs or whatever that your child was normal and became autistic after the vaccine, wave your arms. Okay. Did you get that? I hope it gets down to CVS. Thank you very much. And wait with you. So, thank you. You got it. I told them we want to send your sea bodies out of here. Right? Basically, we are not all going to make into the room. So many people came out. It's pretty amazing. I think my name is Seth Maddeneran. And so many people came out. It seems that it seems. I'm not going to say it is because it seems like they're saving industry seats in the two front rows, which the senators of the United States told us was not going to happen. So someone either lied to the senators or the senators lied to us, but we all have specific work from our senators who are in this committee that it was first come first serve. But there are two rows of seats saved with light papers that say reserved and nobody seems to know who's going to be sitting there. So I want to make sure it's not pharmaceutical industry that's sitting there because moms have been camped out since final clock in the morning in front of this building. So I will say this, if you can't even make it into an overflow building, the people that can who can go around to their senator and their congressman, that is so powerful that you came to DC to get to that office. Don't feel like you don't count. You count. I was telling the officer that we just wanted the senators to see how many people came out. How many people are here because bodily integrity. This is not about vaccines anymore. This the vaccine conversation ended. This is about the will of the United States government to forcibly inject. Medical procedures on the bodies of people and they're using the measles which is the funniest one to use because my son got a typical measles from his MMR vaccine along with Kawasaki's disease and the loss of the use of his legs for two weeks. So as he began bashing his head into the floor and my little boy started disappearing, most of us were all vaccinators. But we had injured babies. If you can't believe mothers who knew their children, then it doesn't even matter what you read. It doesn't even matter where you go because I tell you something. No one knew my son like I knew my name. No one. I'm sending a police to enforce vaccination. It can in some communities backfire. It certainly isn't easy on anyone. So it's not something done easily. It can be done. But it's just not done easily. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So. So now you know why big pharma and big brother being the big gods of health is not such a great idea. And now you also know some of the tricks employed to make the polio vaccine appear to be the hero while covering up the true origins of the problem, the pesticides employed in the day, some will insist that this was just the hubris of men which allowed for this gross misunderstanding of events leading to the pseudo science. An innocent misunderstanding of minds still evolving. But we would like to remind you that the game of statistics has always been used against the population in sleight of hand and in favor of the vaccines when it comes to... How scientists use influenza vaccine effectiveness. An article you can find on VAC truth published in 2018. Statistical manipulation misinforms people by use of false measurements. Vaccine scientists often can see all the true effectiveness of the influenza vaccine through risk calculations. Researchers use a calculation that essentially artificially inflates the effectiveness of influenza vaccines. Rather than use a statistical measure that more truthfully represents vaccine effectiveness, the researchers choose to use a statistical measure that makes vaccines appear more effective than they truly are. Why is this important? The published studies that report high effectiveness rates are then used by governmental agencies, your pediatrician and mainstream media to attempt to increase influenza vaccine uptake rates. In other words, it's a tactic designed to convince you to get the flu vaccine every year. To understand the specific deception technique, you will need to understand two risks concepts used to obscure findings. Relative risk, RR, and absolute risk reduction AR. RR, relative risk explained. Relative risk compares the chance of a bad outcome between two groups. Statistical definition. The proportion of bad outcomes in the experimental group, group 1, divided by the proportion of bad outcomes in the control group, group 2. Relative risks under 1.0 indicate the tested medical intervention helped patients, while relative risks over 1.0 indicate the medical intervention hurt patients. Absolute risk reduction ARR explained. Absolute risk reduction measures the absolute difference in bad outcomes between two groups, group 1 and group 2. Statistical definition. The proportion of bad outcomes in the control group minus the proportion of bad outcomes in the experimental group. In this case, a larger number means the treatment was helpful, while a small number means the treatment didn't do much to help, and the negative number means the treatment was hurtful. Why RR and ARR are different? Relative risk tells you how badly one group fared in comparison to another group in relative terms. It's akin to saying Johnny jumped half as high as Timmy, but you never know how high each of them jumped. Absolute risk reduction, on the other hand, tells you the actual difference in outcomes between the two groups. This would be akin to saying Johnny jumped 8 feet high, but Timmy jumped 16 feet high. One can see that the absolute risk reduction is a more helpful informative statistical measure, whereas it's easier to hide the magnitude of the differences behind relative comparisons. Again, why is this relevant to vaccines? The general public is interested in one question. If I choose to get the influenza vaccine, will my chances of getting the flu decrease and buy how much? We're not interested in relative comparisons, we're interested in actual true differences. Let's break down a practical example into four easy steps to demonstrate that disparity between relative risk and absolute risk. Step 1. Define the two groups. Good scientific practice is to separate people into groups as closely numbered as possible and as well matched as possible, meaning we attempt to compare groups of people in which all variables are the same, or very similar, except the one variable we're testing. This way we can tell that any significant difference between the two groups is due to the variable we're testing and not some other variable. One of the groups will receive the treatment, let's say vaccine, and another group will receive nothing. This is called the control group. Typically, gold standard medicine would dictate using a saline placebo in the control group. A placebo is a harmless substance that has no effect, used to make the control group think they're getting the treatment. In most vaccine experiments, researchers incorrectly use another vaccine or vaccine ingredients as the placebo. This way, the differences between the two groups will be reduced, muted, and the research researchers can't report in their conclusions. Something to the tune of vaccines didn't increase the amount of adverse reactions significantly. So back to our example. Let's assign 25 people to the control group. These people received the placebo. That is actually another vaccine or a vaccine ingredient. In this case, in 25 people to the vaccine exposed group, these will be the people who get the vaccine. So control group is the placebo group. They get another vaccine or vaccine ingredient. So it's not really a placebo, but it's something that is equally as disruptive to the immune system, though, may not in the same way necessarily. A placebo would be nothing. It would be like a sugar pill. It would be totally harmless. And 25 people to the vaccine exposed group, these will be the people who get the vaccine, the given vaccine. Okay, step two. Implement the treatment and observe results. So the 25 people in the control group receive a placebo and the 25 people in the experimental group receive the vaccine. The results, five people in the control group experience the bad outcome. And three people in the experimental group experience the bad outcome. No, bad outcome means that the person contracted influenza. These outcomes will be used to determine vaccine effectiveness a bit later in the article. 25 people, five bad outcomes, experimental group, same thing, three bad outcomes. So step three, determining percentage of bad outcomes in control group and experimental group. Five people had bad outcomes in the control group. But while three people had bad outcomes in the experimental group. So the percentage of bad outcomes for each group would be control group equals five bad outcomes divided by 25 people total and control group equals 20 percent experimental group. Three bad outcomes divided by 25 people total and experimental group equals 12 percent. So control group 25 people, five bad outcomes, 20 good outcomes equals 20 percent bad outcomes. And with the experimental group it's 12 percent bad outcomes. Step four, calculate relative risk or R. Divide the percent of bad outcomes in the experimental group by the percentage of bad outcomes in the control group. So 12 percent divided by 20 percent equals 0.6 or 60 percent. Step five, calculate vaccine effectiveness. The next step researchers take is to calculate vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine effectiveness equals one minus relative risk. Why is the relative risk value subtracted from one? Remember a value of 1.0 means that the vaccine didn't cause a positive or negative impact on effectiveness. One equals no impact. Given we calculated a relative risk of 0.6 in order to determine the magnitude of the benefit from the vaccine we subtracted from one. From one, using the relative risk value of 0.6, 60 percent we now plug into the vaccine efficacy formula. VE equals one minus 0.6 equals 0.4 or 40 percent. So our vaccine effectiveness is 40 percent. So relative risk equals 12 percent divided by 20 percent equals 0.6. Vaccine efficacy one minus 0.06 equals 0.4 or 40 percent. Absolute risk reduction equals 20 percent bad outcomes in control minus 12 percent bad outcomes in experimental equals 8 percent. Which value makes the vaccine look better? 40 percent vaccine efficacy derived from relative risk or 8 percent absolute risk reduction. Now we have our vaccine effectiveness value which the researchers obtain from relative risk. But the relative risk doesn't tell us the true difference in vaccine effectiveness between group 1 and group 2. So now we look toward absolute risk reduction. The measure that is much more representative of reality. In order to find absolute risk reduction, we subtract the percentage of bad outcomes in the control group from the percentage of bad outcomes in the experimental groups. 20 percent minus 12 percent equals 8 percent. So our absolute risk reduction is 8 percent. This is in stark contrast from the vaccine effectiveness of 40 percent. Looks a little different doesn't it? With those same original data and associated bad outcomes, flu cases, we came up with two completely different results on vaccine effectiveness. Notice that the vaccine effectiveness derived from relative risks looks a lot better than the absolute risk reduction of only 8 percent. This is why the published study results always use relative risk. Relative risk makes the vaccine look better, more effective than it really is. Application to a randomized control trial on the influenza vaccine. Now let's apply these statistical formulas to an actual randomized control trial. The study conducted by Baron Ettauld in 2009 examined the 2006-07 influenza season. Efficacy of inactivated split virus influenza vaccine against culture confirmed influenza in health aspect of randomized placebo controlled trial. There were 49 incidences of influenza-like illness in the vaccine group and 74 incidences of influenza-like illness in the placebo group. Since this is only a random sample, we need to determine whether the difference between the two groups is an effect that exists in the entire population. For this, we use a hypothesis test, two proportions test. Here we have the vaccine in the placebo influenza count, 49 placebo 74 group size, 5104 group size, 2,549. So a small group gets more flu. Okay. There were 49 incidences of influenza-like illness in the vaccine group and 74 incidences of influenza-like illness in the placebo group. Since this is only a random sample, we need to determine whether the difference between the two groups is an effect that exists in the entire population. For this, we use a hypothesis test, two proportions test. 2005-1049 people in the control group 74 flu cases, 2475 with no flu. So basically this is the total and that's the flu and no flu. The sum right here. Experimental group, we had more people, less flu cases, more people with no flu. So the result's here, I mean that the reported vaccine effectiveness in this study is 66.9%. Yet the actual absolute risk reduction or true difference between the vaccinating control groups is only 1.9%. Because here you have the absolute risk of vaccine efficacy is 66.9. When you take 0.29 and 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.194 or 1.94%. Yeah, 1.94 effective percent effectiveness. For all the risks that come with it, right, because you're not just getting some sort of alleged immunity, which can't be proven, but you're getting a whole host of other risks as well. So, yeah, and if the, the, and this group doesn't even count if the placebo they're getting is a vaccine. So that this could be causing other injuries. For all we know, if they gave them a vaccine, they could have put in a flu-fucking thing in there to jump the numbers up. The placebo is not sugar if they're actually, so there's a lot of ways they can mess with the statistics of that to begin with. Because earlier they mentioned that the placebo might be another vaccine. Anyways, so the absolute risk reduction is only 1.9%, but it's an incredibly significant difference. The general populace would be led to believe the vaccine is 67% effective. Yet the data indicates the difference is extremely small. Final analysis, the sample size of the placebo group should have been much higher to improve accuracy. 5,103 people in the vaccinated group and only 2,549 people in the control group. Yeah, this is a point I'm not dressed in this article thus far. Just for arguments, like if the control group had 5,103 people, the same number as the experimental group, what would be the absolute risk reduction be? Remember the absolute risk reduction was only 1.9% with the previous data. If we had equally numbered groups, the absolute risk reduction would be 0.49. That's essentially no difference between the vaccinated and placebo groups. As an aside, there are many, there may be other confounding contaminating variables that impact effectiveness value, like medical, history, health, status of the participants. Yeah, we're living in a vacuum here. We don't know what other criteria were met or not. One can plainly see that vaccine effectiveness frequently touted by mainstream media sources in government health agencies are exceptionally deceptive why, because they are derived from relative risks rather than absolute risks. Vaccine effectiveness is really the inverse of what you want to know. Absolute risk is a much more truthful measure than relative risk, as it gives you the actual difference between the two groups. So that's how the numbers are played. And we can see for anyone to claim that vaccines are safe and effective, does a completely impossible statement considering they were deemed legally unavoidably unsafe. And vaccine injury is so prevalent that even those who are vaccine injured will make excuses for it. But the science just is not there. We are not living better or longer. We are living sicker and shorter, and far more worse nightmare is an informed public. But the pill that everybody wants is a bit of a pill to swallow. So don't believe what I post, research what I post, because ultimately if you're not thinking for yourself, someone else is. And this is part of what got us into this fine mess in the first place. So let's take a pause here and gather ourselves and come back, check back because those who subscribe and ring the notification bell are not guaranteed to be notified since I am 100% shadow band most of the time. So we'll be putting out part three shortly. We will continue to explore some of the deepest truths of interest behind the FDA and medical institutions that promote, protect, and push vaccines on an unwilling and unwitting public, exposing the underlying cause of all diseases and universal cures suppressed at this day by those who would rather manage the disease than cure it. And we'll see how the emerging viruses are being used to both scare and control, as well as manage world populations today and in the coming years. Please like, subscribe, and ring the bell to be notified, and check back regularly as YouTube has been actively shadow banning this channel for years, depriving me in this work of true viewership, or the benefits other members receive is a poor business practice, false advertising that goes against their public platform profile claim. Discrimination based on forcing a mainstream narrative as a priority right away when it comes to providing any sharing services other users are entitled to. This goes beyond their right to free speech, but clearly until I can afford a lawyer there is nothing I can do but try my best to remind my listeners to follow me actively. So check back real soon if it's not already up. As we finish answering the question, did vaccines really save us? Be well to be continued.