JIM FETZER 'The Raw Deal" (9-11-19) 9/11 Special Part 2 Dennis Cimino

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fett's or continuing with the program. My presentation about 9-11, which was interrupted at Justice Juncture, which is most interesting because this may be the single most important slide in the entire set. Namely, if no planes crash, then no passengers died. No Islamic hijackers caused them to crash. And if no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash, then there was no warrant or any justification for the war on terror. That's a pretty sobering message. Meanwhile, we know that we're 19 alleged Islamic suicide hijackers, 15 of whom were from Saudi Arabia. Would you believe a half a dozen of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and made contact with the British media, which David Ray Griffin makes his very first point in his magisterial, the 9-11 Commission report omissions and distortions, published already in 2004, meaning there's no reason in the world. My American authorities would be unaware and where it is to me quite striking that although this information was, of course, sent to the FBI, the then director Robert Mueller made no effort to correct the list of alleged terrorists who perpetrated these offenses, which continue to be that the original completely fabricated lists because as we know now, none of those planes actually hid any of their alleged targets. None of them crashed, two of them were even in the air. And the other two were still in the air after the crash and indeed were not taken out of service for four more years. Meanwhile, between the destruction of the South Tower, which although hit first, hit second. But collapse would be destroyed first because atop 30 floors of the building tilted to the side and then was blown up as even as even Stephen Jones himself acknowledged, though he's a champion of the nano thermite hypothesis, which can't possibly be responsible for what happened here, but where that seems to me to be enormously significant. Knowing that the destruction of the South Tower, where the fires had only burned at a considerably less than 2,000 degrees for only an hour while the under-iters laboratory certification was that the buildings could withstand fires as intense as 2,000 degrees for three or four hours without suffering any damage either weakening or melting. It turned out that the North Tower would only endure those fires for an hour and a half. And similarly, they burned neither hot enough nor long enough to cause any structural effect on the buildings. A segment of Palestinians rejoicing appeared on the world stage on this television when probably the largest audience in the history of the world was observing. And it was used to create the impression that Palestinians were rejoicing over the attacks on 9-11 when in fact they were just as dumb-pounded and slack-jod as most of the rest of the world apart from the perps themselves. Indeed, it was even alleged that a phone call had been received from the popular front for the liberation of Palestine. As a Palestine perhaps the poorest and least technically sophisticated population in the world could have had anything to do with 9-11. But it's extremely indicative of the Israeli attempt to blame Palestinians for everything. This is an example of their going a bridge too far for those who are sophisticated enough to understand what was actually going on. Rudy Giuliani was very much involved, very active. I think way too much involved, way too active, for example, in New York. I would infer it would have to take a month to arrange to have a single dump truck for a pickup but Rudy Giuliani of the following day had 115. They were not only being used to immediately remove the debris from Ground Hazero interesting designation. Not bringing in thousands of tons of dirt that was put on top with a debris pile so that it was actually growing for the first couple of days, which is exactly what the Soviet Union did at the time of the Chernobyl mount down. They brought in thousands of tons of dirt to absorb the radio activity. It just happened to be the day of the mayorality election in New York City. I think Rudy thought this election, this event was going to catapult him to a third term as New York City mayor. Meanwhile in Israel, back in the 1980s, Bibli Natt Niyahu had organized a conference on terrorism, how the West can win before anyone was even familiar with the concept. He published a book about it, the cover of which you can see here, where with the demise of the Soviet Union in 1990-91, a Neocon v. Tank emerged called Project for a New American Sanctuary that was advocating the view that the United States were to move aggressively into the Middle East and exert military and diplomatic pressure outward from that geopolitically sensitive region. It create a new American empire that would endure for the next 100 years. This had nothing to do with creating an American empire. This had everything to do with using the United States, its military and treasury, to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalanced Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually to confront the Persian nation of Iran. This year, from one of the think tanks, the Project for a New American Sanctuary's publications, rebuilding America's defenses, a passage it would attract a great deal of attention in the aftermath when the event of 9-11 was being described as a new Pearl Harbor. Look what we find here. They wanted the U.S. to seize the historic opportunity of the demise of the Soviet Union to affirm its role as the world's only superpower, but they worried that Americans wouldn't appreciate the opportunity in that it could slip through their fingers. So they wrote, further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pacing content of transformation as much as the requirement of current divisions, missions. But there it is. They were planning the seed of the necessity for a new Pearl Harbor, which had already been in the works, and where Wesley Clark would eventually share with the American people on 3 October 2007 at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco that when he had returned to the Pentagon after serving a Supreme Commander Allied Forces Europe, in other words, as commanding General of NATO, he'd encounter a general of his acquaintance in the Pentagon, who had explained to him that there was a plan to attack Iraq, which they both thought quite puzzling because Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, so Clark told his fellow general to keep him informed. He was back months later and encountered the same general. When Clark asked him, we still blame to attack Iraq, he said, oh no sir, it's much worse now. I just received a memorandum from the Secretary of Defense, Ramasfeld. Clark said, is the memorandum classified? And the general said, oh yes sir, and Clark said, well then don't show it to me because I may want to discuss it later, where the memorandum outlined a plan to attack seven governments in the next five years, beginning with Iraq and Libya ending with Syria and the Persian nation of Iran. Now, it hasn't played out that way because of the intervention of Russia and Iran at the request of the Democratic, the elected president of Syria, Bashir Al-Assad, who by the way enjoys his support of 80% or more of the Syrian people. So when a fine candidate like Tulsi Gabbard is attacked for a consulting meeting with a dictator of Syria, that's wrong on at least two counts, even three. First, he's not a dictator, he's a democratically elected president. Second, you need to know what's going on on the scene where Syria has been this source of tremendous strife and conflict and loss of life. And third, Tulsi's burnishing her anti-war, her non-interventionist credentials as a military officer, actually she's been promoted to major in the medical court. I frankly believe she is the most promising candidates among all the Democrats who otherwise resemble the contents of a clown car, but there it is. Here are some of the key players from 9-11, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perl, who in their positions in the Department of Defense, were moving very rapidly to promote the idea of this war on terror and where they had played a role in prepping the situation, including the panic on for the events of 9-11. So there'd be minimal damage to the building, which by the way included reinforcing the West wing so it would be bomb resistant, it was the wing that happened to be attacked. And because it was undergoing renovation, it was largely bereft of personnel in records at the time of the attack, but it did have, and I was fairly astonished when I went to the inventory of 120 alleged casualties through the Pentagon. No less than three dozen financial experts, accountants, budgetary figures who were, it turns out, directed to the West wing by the Secretary of Defense in order to review the records for the missing 2.3 trillion, which had disappeared while Doug Zaukheim, a dual U.S. Israeli citizen who's also actually a rabbi, was a controller. It was a very odd thing that Rumsfeld had announced on Monday that the Pentagon was missing this massive sum because that's a kind of story that would grow legs during the week. And therefore a savvy politician as was Donald Rumsfeld would not reveal it early in the week unless he knew that some event would intervene in the meanwhile, and he'd be able to waltz into the halls of Congress and ask for hundreds of billions more in defense spending, which is exactly what would happen. Meanwhile this is Philip Zaukheim who would become the head executive director of the 9-11 Commission highly fitting because it appears to me that Philip Zaukheim was the author of the entire fanciful narrative for 9-11, whereas area of expertise before he entered government in the academy was a creation and maintenance of public mits, NYTHS. And that, of course, is what he gave us in the 9-11 Commission report, a draft of which he had completed a year before he shared it with any member of the staff. And prior to any investigation having taken place, which is suitable because he knew in advance exactly what scenario he wanted the public to receive. Meanwhile we have a judge, a Zionist judge by name of Alvin K. Hellerstein in New York City for the district court of this other district of New York, who's been involved in the high profile 9-11 related cases and managed to quash them all quite successfully. So he has in my estimation been the Litzpin to guarantee that legal action involving 9-11 would be thwarted, depressed, incapable of moving forward, fascinating. There are two of the key players from 9-11, E-Hood, Barak and VB Netanyahu, who were, I think, the most important figures in bringing these events about. Meanwhile we have a statement, one from E-Hood, the world will not be the same from today on. It's an attack against our whole civilization. I don't know who is responsible. I believe we will know in 12 hours who is responsible. If it is a kind of bin Laden organization and even if it's something else, I believe that this is the time to deploy a globally concerted effort led by the United States, the UK, Europe and Russia against all sources of terror. The same kind of struggle that our forefathers launched against the piracy on the high seats. And notice how he's planning the idea that Osama bin Laden could have been involved here, which of course is preposterous on many grounds of which the public is unaware. Osama was our man in Afghanistan. He was instrumental in getting the Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujajidin. They used to shoot down the Soviet helicopters and planes and drive them out of Afghanistan. He was also an officer in the CIA. He had the rank of Colonel. His name was Tim Osman. We're an official from the agency actually visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death in Afghanistan from his medical maladies. It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan. From 15 December 2001, which was reported in local obituary, where he was buried in an unmarked grave, and where both Fox News and CNN reported his death on 26 December 2001. You'll notice that's a long time. That's a full decade before. Marco Bama would resurrect him in order for him to die again during a stage raid on the compound in Pakistan, which benefited. Broco Bama immeasurably because he was under attack at the time because wontonimo was still open though that wasn't really his doing. It was opposition from Republican senators primarily, but where he could claim that the tip about the location of Osama had come from Pakistan. From a member incarcerated at wontonimo, jee on guests were glad it's still open. He was also under attack for having troop station in Pakistan and where he could claim they were used to conduct the raid on the compound again. Wow, taking him right off the hook and third most importantly, his birth certificate from Hawaii, which is a fabrication, I spent like two hours with an expert going through it on an earlier show of mine. Had been a controversial issue, getting a lot of front page news, well it was wiped right off and replaced by his having taken out the most wanted man in the world, positioning him for a triumphal re-alaction. It's absolutely embarrassing, but that's the kind of guy we had there as the first African American president of the United States. Here's a quote even more telling from Beaming Net Nihahu, if we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. And what does not what matter what you do, America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves. And that's from Beaming Net Nihahu, who, tragic to report, is a close personal friend of the president of the United States Donald Trump. Meanwhile of course they had allies in the American government, including Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, indeed Robert Rupert, Michael Rupert in his masterful book, Crossing the Room of Khan, used publicly available sources to isolate and determine that Dick Cheney had been the executive director of 9-11 from a bunker beneath a White House about which in my opinion there is not any real serious room for doubt. And where George W. Bush was largely kept in the dark because he was such a dim bulb. For example he would report several times that when he saw that first hit, meaning on the North Tower by flight 11, he thought to himself, man, what a terrible pilot. But the Naude footage wasn't even released until the following day. And Bush was reporting Washington in real time. He repeated it on more than one occasion. And indeed what that meant was since it took place while he was on his way in a presidential motorcade to booker elementary school in Sarasota, not far from where I was cited for five years while I was teaching at New College of the University of South Florida, he appears to have been watching on a secret service closed circuit television. And because the facade of the North Tower would normally be about as interesting as watching grass grow, the camera had to be set up deliberately in advance because they knew what was going to take place. When Bush wanted to tell this for a third time for a video interview, they actually edited it out because it was too revealing. But that shows he really wasn't in the loop. And he was sincerely reacting to a phenomenon he could only have observed personally at the time through a closed circuit television set run by the secret service in his limousine. Meanwhile I continue to publish articles about it. This is one from an excellent article by Jack Mollett. We talked about a 9-11 truth awareness curve that the longer you investigate, the more and more you become convinced about who was in fact responsible, going from Al Qaeda if you're very naive in the beginning, to the Neocons, to the Zionists, and to Israel, where I have no doubt that there's a consensus among the best experts in 9-11 that indeed Israel was responsible for 9-11. Among those I would include Alan Sbrowski, who taught at the Naval War College of former Marine Corps officer like myself, who has been very outspoken about the role of Israel in 9-11. Christopher Bolin, the noted investigating journalist who has a book of 9-11 solved. And while Christopher is weak on the science of 9-11 and how the buildings were destroyed, he's very strong on the politics. And yours truly is founder of scholars for 9-11 Truth, where I brought together experts from all over the world in different disciplines. Businesses, pilots, engineers, aeronautical, structural, civil, mechanical, even electrical to pool their resources in a loose affiliation where you can still visit our website at 9-11 scholars.org, which archives a great deal of important information about 9-11. Ronald Trump interestingly was the first personality in the world to contest the official version of the attacks on 9-11 on television that very day. After having noted that the engineers who built the twin towers were now working for him, he declared on New York's Channel 9 that it was impossible that Boeing could aburse through the steel structures of the towers. He continued by stating it was also impossible that Boeing's leading jet fuel-based fires could have caused the towers to collapse. It concluded by affirming that there had to be other factors of which we were as yet unaware, and he specifically mentioned bombs. He was 100% correct about it. Indeed, we now have a new study from the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. Fired did not bring down tower 7 on 9-11 either. On September 11, 2001 at 5.20 p.m. This is about seven hours after the destruction of building one, the North Tower. World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly collapsed into its own footprint. It free-falls speed for 2.5 seconds of its 7-second complete destruction. This week, architects and engineers for 9-11 truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in releasing a draft report of an in-depth four-year study that would actually brought down building 7. It's a draft report because they're taking public comments before they make it final. But here's the crucial conclusion. Fired did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9-11 contrary to the conclusions of NIST in private engineering firms who studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near simultaneous failure of every column in the building. In other words, this was a classic controlled demolition. Now interestingly enough, that's exactly what Dan Rather said in his reporting at the time. This was Dan Rather alive. Notice he misidentifies the building is building 5, but the building in question is most certainly building 7. And what he says about it is quite telling. It's going to complex. It's just collapse downtown. This is a lie. I'm going to restart this because photograph of yet another built. It's in mind that the world trades in a complex, certainly as I go there, which is it has seven buildings, sort of as the two towers. They're gone. Now, we reported some time ago that two other buildings in the world trades in a complex were in danger of collapsing. One of those buildings has collapsed. There is an unconvermed report. An unconvermed report that is building 5, but we do not know that. Other sources are reporting this building 5 in a complex, but we do not know that. What you are looking at this is these are live pictures here. We mix live and take, try to make it clear to you throughout the day. That's live. What's video tape. This is live tape and you can tell it to at least another building collapsed because the density and the amount and the, frankly, the altitude of the smoke has increased so dramatically in that area. Keep in mind, if we're sent this to the world, we say it again. What you're seeing are high shots. Now here we're going to show you a videotape of the collapse itself. Now we go to videotape to collapse in this building. Straight down. It's amazing. Amazing, incredible, peculiar word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by workplace dynamite to knock it down. So therefore, the smoke that we were talking about and keep in mind, the firemen, at least when other workers down there working searching for people in the previously collapsed world trade system to towers, fates unknown. But this is an incredible situation. This has never happened before in the United States. This is the most serious attack on US soil. This has happened to get again. What you're seeing are high shots. Now here we're going to show you a videotape of the collapse itself. Now we go to videotape to collapse in this building. It's amazing. It's an amazing, incredible, peculiar word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by workplace dynamite to knock it down. So Dan Rather was actually right on top of it, observing that this was like the demolition of buildings by well placed dynamite to bring it down. It may or may not have been dynamite, but it was certainly well placed because this was an absolute piece of perfection as regards the controlled demolition where fire had nothing to do with it as a University of Alaska Fairbanks has quite correctly concluded. But where Dan Rather was really Johnny on the spot in this instance by identifying, this is a classic controlled demolition from scratch. Meanwhile, in accordance with controlled demolitions, it left behind a residue of about 12 percent of Pala D'Abrig, well, about 12 percent of the height of the original, which was 47 floors. Five and a half floors. You see here Barry Jennings, who actually was in an emergency management employee for the city of New York, came down to enter building seven because Rudy Giuliani had his own command and control center there with two floors with their own air and water. And Giuliani chose not to go there. When Barry Jennings showed up, he found half eaten sandwiches, still steaming cups of coffee. A fireman came along and said, we've got to get you out of here and assisted Barry in making an exit. Meanwhile, explosions were going off inside the building. But a stairwell blown out from under him. All this is taking place in the morning mind you. At one point, he fell himself stepping over dead people. The one the pitch black darkness, he could see them. When he got out, he gave interviews, such as the one from which you see a frame here, where I believe you can find some still available online. Now, the 9-11 commission did not even mention building seven in its official report, which created quite a lot of criticism and outrage, which led them to conduct a separate report about 9-11. The one that the University of Alaska Fairbanks was critiquing, including that fire had been responsible, which is frankly preposterous. No steel structure high rise has ever collapsed due to fire and history. Yet, we're supposed to have had three on 9-11. Just to give you an indication of the robustness of building seven, it was erected over two enormous electrical generators, providing backup electricity for lower Manhattan. Even in the twin towers, they used massive steel beams that were hollowed out in the center because they provide virtually as much structural support of solid steel beams, but in building seven, they used solid steel beams. Just as we will find it would have been impossible for either of the twin towers to have collapsed, the same maybe said of building seven, my personal surmise. It may have been the most robust building ever erected by the hand of man. Meanwhile, now here you see on the left the debris pile from building seven in the center. You see this enormous cavity blown out, it appears from the inside out and building six. In a right hand foreground, you see where building one had stood, but notice, in particular, since building one was 110 floors, had it been the subject of any kind of collapse. There would have been a 12% of 110 or about 13 and a half floors of debris at that location when it wasn't there. Father Frank Morales, a first responder from St. Mark's Episcopal Church, for example, came on my show twice to report that both building one and building two were actually destroyed two or even below ground lava. In other words, they did not collapse. And indeed that is part of the greatest mystery we have with regards to 9-11, how it was gone, which I shall now explain. The building's construction of which began in 1968 were magnificent in their design. They had a tube within a tube construction with 47 massive core columns in the center, surrounded by 230 external steel support columns, which were quite massive and formidable in and of themselves, connected by steel trusses that were filled with concrete. As we've already learned because of the V-shaped grooves and the trusses, in some areas they were, the concrete was four inches and others eight inches thick, or because the buildings were 280 feet on a side, each floor represented an acre of concrete on a steel truss. These were extremely formidable buildings. As Chuck Baldwin, who's a retired high school physics and math teacher, has observed, the steel was tapered from the thickest in the subbasement six inches thick to five to four to three to two to one to a half and eventually onto a quarter inch at the top. So top 14 floors actually represented a relatively small percentage like 1.6% of the mass of the steel, or the very idea that that 1.6% of the mass of the steel could overcome the lower 98.6% is a physical absurdity. Whereas seven buildings in the World Trade Center is Dan Rather observed, the three mark red here of course being the north and the south towers and you can see their diagrams here, and the 47 floor building seven. Then we had the other buildings, the Marion Hotel, three World Trade Center, four, five and then six, where we saw that huge gage in building six. It was an asbestos problem actually the World Trade Center was under a directive from the New York Court authority that the asbestos that had been used in their early construction head to be removed. Well, taking it out by erecting steel scaffolding around 110 story buildings would have been prohibitively estimated at a billion dollars a piece. So that really was not feasible. And of course, bringing it down by classic controlled demolition was excluded because it would have released the asbestos fibers and other toxic elements into the atmosphere. How convenient that just six weeks after it came into the hands of the private property of Silverstein properties where Larry Silverstein immediately fired the security firm that had been looking after the tower since it was first opened in 1970 and replaced it with an Israeli firm and also renegotiated the insurance policy on the World Trade Center to include a terrorist attack clause so that he could maintain two planes at attack and therefore there were two two attacks two planes at hit and therefore there were two attacks and secure double indemnity wearing pocket and some four and a half billion dollars on a hundred and fourteen million dollar investment. They don't call him walkie-lary for nothing. Meanwhile notice the total destruction of the World Trade Center and the impunity of effects on any other building. In fact, it's as though all and only buildings with a WTC designation have been designed, purposely designed for destruction because that's precisely what happened. Meanwhile though much of the public is unaware there were earlier explosions in the sub-basement that was supposed to coincide with the impact of the planes. Indeed as I shall explain, the proposed explanation was to be that jet fuel had fallen through the elevator shafts and caused these explosions in the sub-basement. The damage was real. The system of a lobby was nothing on the order of what would happen subsequently. Here you can see the relative modest impact reports a seismic effect of those explosions really not the impact because we know no planes actually hit the building. Have as I recall point six and point four on the Richter scale relatively modest where you would eventually when the buildings would be destroyed. You had a substantially greater impact on the Richter scale but it still was nothing comparable to had the buildings collapse. That's because the great mass of the buildings was destroyed in the air by the demolition mechanism and never hit the ground fascinating. Gordon Ross and Craig Perlong undertook very meticulous studies of the time at which those explosions had taken place, given the seismic recordings and the time that the planes were led to have hit the building. In according to the commission flight 11 hit the North Tower at 84640 and flight 175 to South at 903, 11. But what they discovered was that on the basis of the seismic recording there was a 14 second discrepancy because the seismic recordings showed the event happened in 84626 in relation to the North Tower and at 90254 for a 17 second difference in relation to the second. This appears to be a hand-eye coordination problem that they were supposed to set out these explosions in the sub basement to go inside with the apparent hit of the planes but it didn't quite work out because of which Gordon Ross and Craig Perlong published their article entitled seismic proof 9-11 was an inside job about which they are 100% correct. I mean notice Islamic terrorists can't sell them explosions in the sub basements of the twin towers, much less sub them off 14 and 17 seconds before the planes that even reach the towers according to the photographic and seismic evidence. I mean the deeper you dig the more absurd it becomes. The fact is I was alluding that they would try to explain away these explosions by jet fuel falling through the elevator shaft is contraindicated by the fact that these were basically 330 story buildings stacked on one another and after you got off the first you'd have to go to another elevator and then after you got off the second another elevator and so forth where there were very few that actually went all the way from the top to the bottom service elevators. Where Willie Rodriguez who was a senior custodian in the North Tower reported that one of his fellow custodians was trapped in one of those elevators yet he survived which would have been impossible. Had it actually occurred as the government claims. Now what Willie told me too when he came here to Madison and we had dinner together after he spoke was he watched the sub basements fill up with water which is when I realized that those explosions were intended to drain the sprinkler systems of water or that sprinkler systems had been installed after a major fire in the North Tower on the 13th floor in 1975 which actually did burn at an estimated 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for three to four hours and therefore was a perfect test of the certification by underwriters laboratories which they passed perfectly properly. But they had to drain that the water systems up because otherwise they would have extinguished the very modest fires that remain after the massive fireballs have been expanded in the first 15 or 20 seconds. The sprinkler systems that were installed in the buildings following that fire in the North Tower in 1975. Now the reason they had to use a very ingenious mode of demolition is because the two buildings between towers were built inside of a moat colloquially referred to as the bathtub to keep out Hudson River water. The Reagan's either bathtub which survived very much intact where the building one and building two the North and the South Towers had been had any substantial mass of either of those 500,000 ton buildings hit the bathtub. It would have allowed Hudson River water to flood beneath the lower head man had the most valuable real estate in the world causing a bit of a catastrophe for the community, the business and financial community. So they designed a very ingenious mechanism to ensure that would not happen. Here you can see externally the North Tower coming down these are three stages where the building was blowing apart in every direction from the top down. Now notice this is not a collapse contrast with what you saw of building seven when it came down in that perfectly symmetrical fashion. That building was not blowing apart in every direction. In that building all the floors came down at the same time. In this instance all the floors remain stationary, waiting their turn to be blown to king them and come in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds. Now according to the government that relatively modest mass of 1.4% of the steel worked as a pile driver on the lower floors and caused them to collapse. But it's a physical absurdity. The chalk ball when it's calculated that for every downward unit of force it would be a 199 upward units of force meaning it would have been impossible for either of the twin towers to have collapsed. That had those top floors actually collapse that would have just come down a ways until the resistance overwhelmed the downward for us and they would have rested there at top the buildings. But of course that did not happen. Here you see the North Tower in a further state of its demolition. Would anyone in their right mind imagine that this was some kind of collapse? Absolutely not. And here is a fascinating piece of footage of the remaining spires of the North Tower as an undergoes molecular dissociation. Everybody would have suggested this was because of the use of directed energy weapons that might even have been located on satellites in space. But the amount of energy that would have been required to transmit that force to the towers would have been simply overwhelming. It would not have been a physical possibility. Well, Judy's fans are very dedicated and loyal to her. We have scientific evidence that supersedes his periscount and makes it evident that what we're witnessing here was a phenomenon of a very different character. Here we have a very fine dust that enveloped lower man hat whereas it happens. Those buildings were not only undergoing explosions from the top down, but were being converted into millions of yards of very fine dust which incidentally is a signature of the use of nuclear devices, millions of cubic yards of very fine dust. Here my contrast is actual collapse of a building in Pakistan. I mean, this just didn't happen in the York City. So building seven did undergo a collapse. And that was because it was the target of a very professional, totally competent demolition where the symmetry of the effect was breathtaking. It was so clear, it was so clean that a Dutch expert on controlled demolition when they asked when shown the footage without any identification that this would come from New York City on 9-11 identified it is of course a controlled demolition that professionals had done it and was dumbfounded when told this had been a building that had been destroyed in New York on building seven. Now the use of these nuclear devices which has been confirmed has been subject to a couple of many theories, meaning we know it was done with a nuclear, with nuclear devices, but there's been debate about precisely how it was done where I have been an advocate of the theory that it was done with a sophisticated arrangement of many or micro-nukes where it appears that Israel was given hundreds of David Crockett tactical nuclear warheads which they took back to Israel and refined and then brought back to the United States to be emplaced in the Twin Towers. An alternative theory however, as it that there was a relatively modest nuclear device in the sub-basement beneath the core columns of the buildings and that they were destroyed by blowing the core columns or the inner tube from the bottom up and then the effects of the outer tube occurred as a consequence. Rodenus Camino in his brilliant article, a world as a swirl in a volcano of lies, was among the first to champion that view but where now other experts in this area are advocating the same position as to how it was done, fascinating stuff. What we know is it cannot have been nano-thermite or directed energy weapons, not least of all because it was a massive steel assembly ejected from the North Tower at a 45 degree angle that wound up in the winter garden, where as Don Fox has observed, the winter garden where do's a nano-thermite go to die, where it turns out that jet fuel fires even if they burned long enough and hot enough because the buildings to sag and gradually collapse and then would be stemmed by the upward support, Jack Baldwin has identified. Jet fuel could not have ejected 300 tons up at a 45 degree angle and 600 feet outward into the winter garden. To destroy steel and explosive needs to have a detonation velocity of 6100 meters per second to destroy cement, a detonation velocity of 3200 meters per second is required. Caracene, the principal constituent of jet fuel, has a detonation velocity of only 1600 meters per second. Nano-thermite, however, has a detonation velocity of just 895 meters per second. Small or many nukes would have had the observed effects, but they would not have been possible from jet fuel or nano-thermite or even directed energy weapons of the kind Judy Wood has described. Meanwhile, it just so happens that all the reports for what was supposed to be the largest elevator renovation in history conducted by ace elevator were destroyed during the event, where this renovation appears to have been the cover story to gain access to the core columns and prep the building for their destruction. Here we have the results of the US Geological Survey that discovered a host of elements that in their quantities and correlations would only have been present had this been a nuclear event, including barium, instructium, thorium, and uranium, lithium, lantinium, yttrium, chromium, tritium, some of which only exist in radioactive form. Not only that, but what is sometimes called the curse of ground zero. And notice how that phrase ground zero is used historically to designate the center of a nuclear explosion. The number of cancer cases among 9-11 responders and survivors have tripled to more than 5,400 in less than three years. Well, actually the number is considerably greater. We're talking about forms of cancer that are highly unusual, including leukemia, multiple myeloma, issoffageal pancreatic cancer, very similar to the effects on the population in Russia at the time of the Chernobyl event, whereas many of 70,000 first responders and local residents of the area are expected to succumb to the effects of these nuclear catastrophes. Heim's Palmer of Germany has done the most recent sophisticated variation on how this was done with a relatively modest nuclear device in the sub-basement. It's absolutely fascinating stuff. You can read about it. Many places include veterans today, which has a 50-part series on the use of nuclear devices at the Twin Towers. Now, here's a very interesting piece by James Corbett about whistleblowers. You frequently hear this story that they would have talked had this been the case, but there are many whistleblowers who did talk so that the delay here between completing this enabled me to incorporate this presentation, which James Corbett only published the very day I initially recorded. So here's what he has to say. Of all the 9-11 whistleblowers, perhaps the most noteworthy are the 9-11 commissioners themselves. The 9-11 commission, formerly the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks of the United States, was set up by President George W. Bush, who dragged his heels a full 441 days before finally establishing a body to investigate the events of September 11, 2001 and to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding them. But that remarkable gap between the events and the impaneling of the commission was not due to mere laziness. Bush actively resisted any investigation for as long as he could, taking the extraordinary and unprecedented step of personally asking Senate Majority Leader Tom Dashel to limit Congress's investigation into those events. It was only when the political pressure to form a commission of inquiry became too great for Bush to resist that he authorized the commission and nominated a chairman. Henry Kissinger. Today I'm pleased to announce my choice for Commission Chairman. Dr. Henry Kissinger. I have been given every assurance that the commission will be able to again support the figures points of valuable all on state Saudi Arabia, for example. The implications and policy of the events that have been added to the United States, particularly the Stellica time. I have been given every assurance that the president should go over the facts that he does. Kissinger's reputation as a cover-up artist and tool of the political establishment was such that even the New York Times speculated that Bush's nomination of him showed that the president wanted to contain the investigation into 9-11, not enable it. 9-11 victims family members similarly concerned that Kissinger was being appointed to run a cover-up commission challenged him to his face to release the client list of his political consulting business. Several family members approached Kissinger and requested a meeting at his office in New York. Prior to the meeting, Kristen Breitwitz would conducted a thorough investigation of Kissinger's potential conflicts of interest. Probably much to the chagrin of some of the people in the room. Laurie asked some very plenty of questions. Would you have any Saudi American clients that you would like to tell us about? And he was very uncomfortable kind of twisting and turning on the couch. And then she asked whether he had any clients by the name of Bin Laden. And he just about fell off his couch. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stepped down from the position Friday. We go at the meeting like well. The next morning, Kissinger resigned his post as head of the 9-11 commission and former New Jersey governor Thomas Cain and former Indiana congressman Lee Hamilton were appointed chairman and vice chairman respectively to take his place. Remarkably, the suggestions of political cover-up did not end there, nor were they confined to a marginalized lunatic fringe of conspiracy theorists derided by the establishment media. The remarkable and almost completely unreported fact is that six out of the 10 commissioners, Cain and Hamilton as well as Bob Gary, Tim Romer, John Lehman and Max Cleenland, have all expressed concern that the commission was misled, stymied, hampered by conflicts of interest, and ultimately forced to participate in a politically motivated cover-up. In their book, Without President, the Inside Story of the 9-11 commission and in press conferences and interviews at the time the report was released, Cain and Hamilton famously remarked that the commission had been set up to fail. Even Lee Hamilton, the co-chair of the 9-11 commission itself, admits to us that the process he had it up was seriously flawed. So, all kinds of reasons. We thought we were set up to fail. We got started late. We had a very short time frame. Indeed, we had to get it extended. We did not have enough money. They were afraid we were going to hang somebody. But it was very difficult and Lee and I write in our book that we thank the commission in many ways was set up to fail. As it turns out, the majority of the commissioners felt that the commission had been lied to deliberately obstructed, undermined by the White House or set up with staff that had conflicts of interest in the investigation. One of these concerned commissioners, Max Cleenland, resigned because the commission had been deliberately compromised by the president of the United States. Commissioner John Lehman, meanwhile, admitted on NBC Nightly News that the commission had to go through Carl Rove and other senior White House members to access key documents in their investigation and that we purposely put together a staff that had in a way conflicts of interest, stressing, unless there be any doubt, that all of the staff had to a certain extent some conflict of interest. Commission members even considered bringing criminal charges against Pentagon officials who had deliberately lied to them about the military's complete lack of response on that day. But perhaps the most cryptic of all the dissenting commissioners was Bob Carey. In 2009, he remarked that 9-11 was a 30-year-old conspiracy, but no mainstream reporter has ever followed up with him to clarify this statement. In 2009, the commission had a conflict of interest in the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowedto go through the investigation and that all of them were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation and that all of the dissenting commissioners were not allowed to go through the investigation. and did not get to the bottom of the story. Even more remarkable is that this fact has never even been mentioned, let alone examined in any mainstream media report. And despite the fact that the majority of Americans believe the government is concealing what it knows about the events of September 11th from the public, to this day anyone who raises questions about the commission or its findings is treated as a conspiratorial loony by those same media personalities that refuse to report on the 9-11 commissions own whistleblowers. It should be apparent by this point that the old argument that someone would have talked is not just fallacious, but factually incorrect. There have, in fact, been numerous whistleblowers with documentable evidence of the frauds and fictions that have been constructed around the official 9-11 narrative. Their disclosures but the, but someone would have talked doubters in an uncomfortable predicament. Either they are lazy, boldly pronouncing on issues they have not themselves bothered to investigate, or they are lying. What is especially gauley when the so-called skeptics use the someone would have talked fallacy is that the whistleblowers have in fact done everything possible to publicize their stories. Holding press conferences, filing formal appeals, joining whistleblower organizations, and making themselves available for interviews. For their heroic efforts, these brave men and women have been fired from their jobs, shown by former colleagues, smeared by the mainstream media, and ignored by the public. Someone would have talked. Indeed, numerous someone have talked. Some of them have even screamed. But when their cries are ignored, the stories of the 9-11 whistleblower sound like the proverbial trees falling in the forest with no one around to hear them. Unless and until we give these valiant men and women a voice, then we will never hope to learn the truth about 9-11. My head is off. The James Corbett and the Vos you have seen. I am the one who has been a great lawyer. I am the one who has been a great lawyer. I am the one who has been a great lawyer. My head is off. The James Corbett and the Vos you saw who have come forward as whistleblowers, including Kevin Ryan, Barry Jennings, William Rodriguez, and the others featured there. For those who want a compendium of research with a dozen contributors, I highly recommend American Nuke on 9-11. Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons, and the DOD in the Most SOD, which is available at moonrockbooks.com. And I want to thank everyone here for listening to the raw deal in this special on the events of 9-11.