JIM FETZER "The Real Deal" (2-9/10-20) Sandy Hook Theater pt.1 and 2.

Video Transcript:

1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% He was a drill but maybe the government came in and killed people. Now his final thing is, no, it wasn't a drill. This kid did it for sure. He did it by himself. He killed all 26 people and himself and his mom. He's gone all the way from one side to the other. It's actually a friend of mine who wrote a hit piece. 2016-16-16 wrote a hit piece about the whole Sandy Hook thing. I believe that they even put a mention of your book in the editorial that they did. It was just a smaller newspaper, but they told people, you know, something like, I can't remember the whole thing. I don't know if they ever sent it to you, but their friends wanted them to go to a gay pride festival in Salt Lake City, Utah. And they were, you know, they usually went to the gay pride festival. But they got a bad feeling and they said about a week before the gay pride festival in Salt Lake City, I'm not going to the gay pride festival. And you guys just watch what happens. I'm going to predict right now that over the next couple weeks, okay, they have the gay pride, different weekends for about three weeks in different parts of the country. They said, I'm not going to go to the gay pride festival downtown. And I hope none of you go to it. And I hope that nobody I know in any other city goes to it, because I'm convinced that the next fault flag that they're having is going to be targeting the gay community. So they didn't go to the Pride Festival. And when the hold during that same weekend that the gay Pride Festival was in Salt Lake, it was also during the gay pride in Orlando, Florida. So then we have that whole post nightclub shooting. And then my friend just said, see, I told you, the government was going to come in and they were going to do some fault flag at the post nightclub. It was just like Sandy Hook, the permit for the Paul said expired three years before. That's when they painted it from white to black. So it was an abandoned club. It only had 11 parking spaces. It only had 150 legal occupancy and they claimed this fantastic story over 300 people were crammed in there. In which case there would have been abandoned vehicles all over the place, but they weren't there because it did not happen. The whole thing was a ruse. And the crisis acting, the crisis acting in that case was appalling. Just read. It was horrible. It was worse. It was worse than Sandy Hook. And so I mean, my friend was right again, because they said, you know, I don't know if it's going to be a mass shooting or a bomb, but I'm not going to that gay pride in Salt Lake. And I would suggest anybody around the country not go to any gay thing. So you know, they had the gay pride festival in Orlando. And then that's where they claim that everybody went, you know, is the post nightclub after after the gay pride festival or whatever. So, you know, my friend was right again, they said, you know, the next fault flag or the next whatever it is they're doing drill and whatever you want to call it. I don't even know what the hell to call these things anymore. The next event, let's just call it an event, they said it will be something that has to do with the LGBT community. So anyways, what actually happened is that they put in their small little editorial piece, which about 3,000,000 people in Salt Lake City saw that's that's what the circulation of their newspaper is. That's, well, that's what they told us that's how many people actually read the newspaper, you know, you've got probably twice that many that pick up the newspaper just to see if there's a movie playing or look at the classified. But as far as how many people actually read the article that my friend wrote, very small article, but probably about 34,000. And as we know what the CIA does, they have people in every major metropolitan area in the United States and they pay them to every single day. Get any of the newspapers, get watch the news that night, okay, they're going to do it anywhere. So many Apple, Salt Lake, Los Angeles, Houston, Texas, New York City, you know what I mean everywhere that the CIA and the Department of Homeland Security have one or two people in every major city that are going to read the newspaper every day. They're going to get every weekly publication. They're going to get every monthly publication and they're going to watch the news every morning, noon and night. They're going to report back to Washington DC. If there's any interest in any of the news stories that are in that part of the country to either control the narrative later on. If that news story gets bigger or to stop it from getting bigger, okay. So my friend had put in this article. A thing about some of the actors at Sandy Hook and how they were already connected to Maureen White, who is a DNC chairwoman, who is like just best friends with Hillary Clinton. So they put in their article, you know, read nobody died at Sandy Hook. Go and read it right now, everybody. And they put in there, you know, a couple examples of times that the government has admitted doing false flags like the Gulf of Tonkin and what was the other one, you know, whatever it was where they were. And then everybody attacked a ship and it was real. They attacked the United States ship or something. Yeah, that's a USS Liberty in 1967. Yeah, the USS Liberty. So people got really mad because of course my friend is liberal. And they put specifically on their article, I'm a liberal and I'm a woman and I'm a feminist. And I hate Hillary Clinton. I don't vote for her. She's evil. And Sandy Hook did not happen the way the government said, go read nobody died at Sandy Hook. And just so you all know, one of these families that was involved with Sandy Hook was already working for gun control, their actors. And you know, didn't say anything nice about Donald Trump. That wasn't the point. But it was to let people know, you know, you know, Donald Trump might be stupid idiot, but so it's Hillary Clinton. So the Clinton campaign got really mad because somebody in their organization, obviously, or the CIA or something could not believe that a liberal woman who claimed to be a feminist was coming out against Hillary Clinton. So before the story got big, they had to do damage control. So instead of waiting for, you know, somebody else to talk about this thing like, oh my god, you know, everybody starting to read this, nobody died at Sandy Hook. They had a plan that they were going to blame the whole Sandy Hook thing on Alex Jones, even though he's only one of, you know, it means to dozen well known people that were talking about it. And they were going to call him alt-right. They were going to say that everybody that, you know, thought about the Sandy Hook thing was alt-right conspiracy theorist. And Hillary Clinton actually came out on some newscast and talked about Sandy Hook and how there's these conspiracy theorists. But what everybody doesn't know is that it was actually because of my friend, his liberal, who's a feminist writing this article. And they had to do damage control that liberal feminist women were against Hillary Clinton and some of them thought something was wrong with Sandy Hook story. So they had to frame it as fast as they could that it was just Alex Jones and people that followed him. So that's when all the heat started going on to Alex Jones and probably death threats. And then you could tell he kind of cracked because he, he was really nice to Wolfgang Halberg the first couple times he was on. But then after that point, he's voice kind of, she started to shake when he had Wolfgang on. And then he was kind of trying to refute what Wolfgang was saying. And then he had that weird guy on that was like in a debate with Wolfgang about about the whole Sandy Hook thing. And then eventually, you know, they just started suing him and everybody and he just kind of sold the whole thing out. That's why they went so hard on him is because they wanted to make sure people thought it was only Alex Jones and his listeners that thought this about, you know, Sandy Hook, even though there's secretly a bunch of liberal actors and Hollywood that think it now too. I'm not going to say their names, you know, I'm not going to divulge their names, but I've talked to some of them. They're like, oh my god, you're right. So there's a bunch of feminists that know about it, a bunch of rock stars. They all just, you know, they're like, I'm sorry. I at this time for my family's thick. I'm just not going to come out and, you know, back you up, but I do think that you're right. So, you know, that's what's basically going on is that more people are kind of finding out. And then the last thing that I'll add as far as that is concerned is that I have somebody that I know they're more of an acquaintance of mine than an actual good friend. But they are like best friends with Ellen DeGeneres. They're from California. They live in a different state now, but they used to go every time they go back to California. Sometimes they wouldn't even stay with their own parents. They'd stay at Ellen's house with her and her wife. And, you know, people were talking to her about it because everybody saw this public service announcement that was in black and white with about 25 celebrities in it, calling for gun control, demand a plan. And so, what service announcement came out six days after Sandy Hook happened. So, as people that know about the film industry, no. The amount of time that it would have taken them to flown all fly all those actors in there. So, I think that's what I think was going to come up with a script of what this public service announcement was going to say. Have everybody come in and film their part. Take it to the editor, take it to the producers, produce it, get it, you know, good to go and then release it on the internet. And then, you know, I think that's what I think was going to say about the film industry. And then, you know, I think that's what I think was going to say about the film industry. And then, you could just tell some really good writer had just written this in a lab or form and it must have taken them quite a while to come up with the script for all these different actors. So, then we find out the year after somebody at the Sundance Film Festival goes up to some huge party with all of these actors and musicians. I'm not going to say exactly what musician it was, but I'll just let you know it was a musician. Their name starts with a B and they got really drunk that night at this party in the hotel after. And they said, you know, I'll tell you the truth. Some of us that were asked to be in this public service announcement for the Sandy Hook shooting for gun control. We were asked before Sandy Hook happened. And some of us, you know, we actually filmed our parts for the public service announcement before Sandy Hook even happened. And they, you know, they know Ellen, they've been on Ellen show. So, of course, Ellen knows, I mean, all these people know it's a complete fake that it was staged to promote gun control. They know something because they, several of them were literally asked to do their part in this commercial. So, it was quite a long commercial before it happened. So, you know, that's that. I mean, I don't, I'm never going to have proof that this woman said this, but, you know, she did. And if you really think about it and you watch the demand a plan public service announcement that came out on December 20th or December 19th at the Sandy Hook. You can piece together. There's no way that they would have had all those actors there. Ask their permission, ask them to be in it, have them say yes. Talk to their agent. I mean, this is, you don't even just go up to an actor and ask them if they want to have a part in something. You have to go through their agent first. Then the agent has to call them. Then the person has to say yes. Then the agent has to call the producers back. Then money has to be worked out. And legal arrangements. And then they have to sign a bunch of forms before before they can even start filming. So there's just no way that they would have gotten that out within, you know, six days after Sandy Hook unless it was already in the works beforehand. So it's just getting kind of ridiculous. And I think that people are, they're just sick of it. So look at what is disgusting. Look at how disgusting it is. People like Ellen DeGeneres is willing to participate in a complete fraud on the American people that has terrified parents all over the nation to promote a gun control agenda that would be harmful to the American people because would make it no longer possible for them to defend themselves against bad guys. I mean, this is disgusting beyond belief. Yeah, it's really disgusting, but I will, okay, I will for a minute. I'll play the devil's advocate for Ellen and people like her because I know how the entertainment industry works. Okay. Ellen DeGeneres, we'll just use her because we're already talking about her as the example, but when you're that big of a celebrity with tens of millions of people watching your show every day, okay, you are completely controlled. I don't make the decision about who's on your show or not. I mean, you can tell your producers, hey, I want to have this band on that I like or hey, I saw this interesting news story, but about 90% of your content, if your talk show host is going to be what your producers want to put on there. You're not going to tell you behind the scenes things and you're also going to have your lawyer coming to you all the time, telling you what you can and can't say. You're going to have the people that fund your show and the network that you're on, so like CBS, they're going to tell you what you can do and say. So I think what happened is I really highly doubt that Ellen DeGeneres would be asked beforehand, do you want to take part in this and we're doing this hoax. I think what happened is they said, oh, we want to film this commercial for for gun control. Okay, they didn't say exactly that it was Sandy Hook. There were people in the thing that obviously said stuff about Sandy Hook. Ellen's part, she didn't say, you know, specifically Sandy Hook. They just asked her, do you want to be in the demand to plan gun control. So she films her part. But then later the day of Sandy Hook realizes, oh my God, you know what I mean? Like, yeah, films her part just thinks it's a general commercial for gun control. Then the day of the shooting goes, oh my God, wait, this is real weird. This is really weird. You know, that I just kill my part in this thing and then doesn't know what to do. And it's just scared shitless as she's on TV trying to pretend like she doesn't know that something is very, very, very, very wrong. And then of course, it's going to be forced in the future to, you know, have like David Hog on and all of these different people. You know, I've noticed that they didn't have a lot of the Sandy Hook parents on things like Ellen DeGeneres. But when the park one shooting happened, they had those people on and when the last thing happened, they had those people on. So they kind of just stayed away from Sandy Hook, but then they were like, well, let's just make Ellen have these people on and Ellen knows she knows there's something very weird going on with Sandy Hook. She knows that the government did it. You know, she knows something for absolute sure I can guarantee that Ellen DeGeneres knows something about Sandy Hook and accidentally not on purpose, but accidentally took part in it. You know, filming her part several days. She was, she was, she was basically duped. Right, she was duped and now she's probably scared for her life. Because I mean, could you imagine what would happen if Ellen came out on her show and said, hey, guess what everybody? You know that Sandy Hook commercial live is in. Well, I got to tell you I actually filmed my part three days before. So, you know, she would be, she would be, you know, members of her family, her mom, that's about 90 years old would disappear. You don't even know if they've already threatened her to disappear her family members or something. So I think that she's kind of a person that got duped into participating. I think that the Kim Snyder director got duped. I don't think either of those two people knowingly did it. But as far as the rest of them, you know, people that were actually supposedly there that day, mostly. You know, I recall having had correspondence with Kim Snyder about that she was perpetrating a fraud by presenting this as though it had been a real mass shooting. I mean, I mean, I actually had correspondence with her. Right. And did she admit anything or say anything or write it back at all? You know, I cannot recall. I mean, I'd have to take a look. Keep going on. See you. Yeah, go do that because she's, you know, she's now, she's roped into it. She's probably afraid for her life. Because if she's a real documentary filmmaker, they're supposed to be almost like a reporter. And if they see information that is contrary to what they originally believe, they're supposed to, you know, research it and find help. So, you know, she probably is starting to do that, but just doesn't want to. And now she's, she's gone the opposite way because she's so scared that they have given her funding at this point for two more movies since the new town. They did the done blame massacre. And then the movie about Parkland that just came out at the Sundance Film Festival. So she's probably just like God went a little bit and are they going to keep forcing me to make these freaking documentaries about these, you know, supposed whatever shooting or whatever. And it's just, they've just one of the things that I don't like that they've done is they've, they've mistaken what the definition of a false flag is. So everybody thinks when they say, oh, quit being a conspiracy theorist and saying this is a false flag, you know, a false flag could be partially true. It could be almost totally true or it could be completely fake like, you know, obviously people obviously people did die at 9.11. Sure. So that's a false flag where, you know, the, the, the, and the CIA and Saudi Arabian government killed people. Well, the most, yeah, and then you have things where it's a complete and total drill and that's a false flag or you have ones that are supposed to be just a hoax or a drill or an event. And then they might go in and surprisingly kill a couple people to make it a hybrid, you know, false flag or whatever. But people are misusing like the gun control people and stuff like that are misusing the term false flag to mean it's false like that you're saying the whole thing is false and that's not necessarily true because some false flags they do kill people or, you know, kill them. Well, look, well, the phrase originated from pirate days when the pirates would fly the flag of a friendly nation to get to approach their target vessel. And then just before they attack, they'd bring down the false flag and run up to scull and bones. Right. Right. It's really, it really means a misattribution of who was responsible for what happened. And typically, you know, most of those were talking about were completely contrived. You talk about Sandy Hook, Boston or Land of Wendella, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas. On the other hand, as you suggest, 9-11 was a real destruction took place. The whole world trade center was destroyed, but it was not done by 19 Islamic terrorists who commandeered four commercial airliners under control of a guy off in a cave in Afghanistan. That's just the easiest and most colossally stupid theory of what happened, one good advance, but that was the government's position and they're sticking to it. Right. Yeah. And they're just, they just, you know, so they just use the false flag term to change what it means. And the other one that everybody does is conspiracy theorists and what they don't understand is that when they hold the American public, at least 64% of the American public thinks that our own government assassinated JFK. Well, and it came from that. The CIA wanted to just credit people that thought that the government killed JFK by calling them a conspiracy theorist. So when you're calling to conspiracy theorists, you're talking about 64% of the public. You got off of the mic. Come back to the mic. Yeah, yeah, see what you're saying is so important. The percentage has been highest 80% and of course for a good reason, I have a four books that document what actually happened and now they covered it up. In fact, in these cases, if you, when you separate the authentic from the inauthentic evidence, they tend to fall into place. Right. Right. So, you know, people are so confused. We don't know what they're going to do next because it seems like they have a pattern of doing false flags where most of the people die and they kill them. Then they'll go and they'll do ones that might be half and half and then they'll go completely to just complete hoaxes where nobody dies. And then, you know, as far as we know it, when everybody starts saying, you know, oh, nobody's dying in these things, you know, when everybody starts agreeing, oh, nobody's died. Then what are they going to do? Go back to killing everybody again. Well, they're reasons the reasons why Amazon is not only banned my book on Sandy hook, but my book on the Boston bombing on Dallas and beyond on on or Orlando on the Charlottesville on Parkland. All those books have been banned because I brought together experts and we put together enough research to blow them apart. So all they can do is ban them, even though that's about as un-American as you can get if you believe in the first amendment, which is one of our greatest strings. And, you know, I'm what I'm personally sick of is I'm sick of going on to YouTube and when I look up something, having a thing pop up to tell me what I should think about the video before I even watch it. Yeah, yeah, these weird explanations on YouTube and I know everybody I know comments under there, no matter who they are. Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative, Christian, atheist, Buddhist, whatever, every single video that has that on there, I see people in the comments section going, why is YouTube trying to tell me what to think? Because people are just getting sick of it. It's just totally outrageous and, you know, banning everybody from Facebook and every time that you, you know, I posted something, it didn't say anything. But it said all it said was the FBI on their own website for three months after Sandy Hook said we'd like to express our condolences to the people of Newtown for the horrible tragedy that happened on December 13, 2014, which are 2012, which is of course the day before they originally said that Sandy Hook happened. What I did, I said, this is what the FBI said themselves on their own website. And of course Facebook is going to strike me. We've removed your comment because it goes against community standards. I don't understand what how a comment pointing out that the FBI said Sandy Hook happened December 13, not 14. How is that going against community standards? Yeah, because it contradicts what they want it to believe. I mean, it's absurd. That's exactly what Amazon has claimed about my books that they're supposed, when they bothered to even tell me that they had been banned, that they violated some standard of Amazon, which is absurd from beginning to end. And then my friend pointed out in that small little editorial that she did in the paper, they're banning Jim's book, but they still got a bunch of books by Charles Manson and Hitler. That stuff is fine. They're not going to ban, you know, mine comps or whatever by Hitler. They're not going to ban a book about Charles Manson admitting killing everybody. They're not going to ban that, but they're going to ban your book so that people what can't read it and decide if they want to partially or fully agree with you or something. You know what I mean? It's like I have all these metals in the form of bands from Amazon. I mean, I don't think a little publishing company with just 12 volumes so far, which has had half of their books banned, has ever occurred in history. Six. This is what I think we should do instead of having the Grammys and the Emmys, we should have the bannys. We should have a full and you know, people would actually pay attention to this. The mainstream media would be forced to pay attention to it because so many people, no matter what your political beliefs are, if you had a show that was like the Oscars or the Grammys, but was for people books and people's movies and stuff that had been banned. And you're giving an awards like to the person who had been banned the most on Facebook and YouTube and couldn't sell your stuff on Amazon got taken off of PayPal. You know, Vimeo was even striking your videos off or whatever and we could call it the bannys. I love it. We could have all of us on there. You're chock full of great ideas. I'd love it. And have this whole thing people would watch it. And you know, I could probably even convince like the independent film channel to do an actual ceremony. Where everybody goes and they're like, OK, we're going to have the nominees for the most banned book. You know what I mean? And we'll have you know, whatever else it was, some of the ones that they banned. What was some of the children's books, somebody banned and all of this stuff and then and they'll go the nominees are and then we'll have like a famous actress or something. And then you know, I'm going to have a romantic music and it'll show you eyes of the crowd and everybody clapping for you during your part or whatever and then out of the five nominees. And then OK, Jim one and then you go up in the tuxedo. Oh, you love it. I'd like to thank my producers and I'd like to thank God and my wife. And then they give you an award, but we'd have to figure out what the award would be like what would it be, you know, how they have the Oscars. Yes, yes, yes. One of the the globe, maybe like a, I don't know, maybe like a statue of a bunch of books on fire, like burning books or something or. Yeah, yeah. Because it was something funny as the actual, you know, award that we're giving out or whatever for for the bannies. Yeah, it would be funny and people would love because when you tell people this was banned, you know, sometimes it makes people really. Well, I want to know what's in there, you know, I want to know that this is about or whatever. And sometimes it draws people because it's kind of forbidden to them, you know, it's just like how kids can't smoke and tell their like whatever 18, you know, depending on what state you're in and they always want to smoke when they're like a teenager. Because they're being rebellious or something. Right, they want to see what they're missing. And the other thing, well, I'm not going to tell anybody that because I think it's a really good idea. I don't want anybody to steal the idea, but well, I'll just tell you, because I'm not going to do it. But we were thinking of having a company. Okay, every single celebrity I know, especially I know some people that are third party candidates for president. You know, whoever sent the Mckinney, Ron Paul, all these people are not Ron Paul, but you know what I mean, those type of people, every single politicians and these actors and these people, I know they get so mad because they'll go for an interview on something. And when they actually get home and watch how the people edited their interview on a purpose. Yeah, to cut out important things they said or frame a question. And then they're answering another question that isn't the question that the person asked in that order to make them look bad. So we were thinking of starting a company where any of these celebrities and politicians that were going to be interviewed CNN or whoever would have to sign a consent form that we would come in. We would promise not to give our recording, you know, either audio or video recording of the person's interview tale after it had been on the news or the TV show. But we would keep their full interview after they had done their sound bites and cut out and everything. The celebrity or the politician or whoever it was that was being interviewed could come to us and they could say, OK, I'm OK with what they presented me like if they're mad and they say they cut this really important thing out that I said on purpose, try to make me look bad. We would have the right to on our website, release the full interview that they gave. So that the mainstream media cannot get away with anymore cutting out what you said, you see what I mean. So a celebrity could get mad and on their own website they could say, hey, everybody go to this website, they cut out this really important thing I said on purpose on CNN. And I want you guys to know the truth about what I actually said and we would have the full interview so that they couldn't cut it out anymore so that they knew that they better do better journalism. I love it. I love it. I love it. We have the full interview that's not what the guy said you cut him off and you cut out his actual answer or whatever and they would never be able to get away with it. And I don't even know why people that are in newspaper interviews. I don't know why they allow themselves to be interviewed and then read their interview. It's like cut and half. And they've kind of cut and pasted everything together. If I was going to be interviewed by a newspaper, I would have my own transcript of the whole entire interview. They could put it out the way they wanted it. And then if I was mad, I would say, nope, here's what I actually said and I for release it to the entire world. So that they can't get away with it anymore. And you know, I don't know how much time we have last, but I do know somebody that was at the Las Vegas shooting. And I do live, well, at this point I live about 30 minutes away, but I do know about a kid with this Brussels bombing. Well, let's stay with Las Vegas. Okay, let's go with Las Vegas. What are you telling me? You know someone who claims to know somebody who was shot at Las Vegas? No, I know somebody that went to that concert. Okay. I know them well. So they are very expert in firearms. They have shotguns their entire life. It's a man. I'll just tell you that. They have gone hunting their whole life with their dad. They have gone to shooting ranges. They've gone out just into the middle of nowhere and shotguns. They know all about gun safety. They, you know, are responsible gun owner. They like country music and they went to the Las Vegas festival because it's only about six hours from Salt Lake City. So they were there. They were there when that happened. I will go into a long story, but I will just tell you that from their expert opinion with firearms. They said for absolute sure the first thing that was happening was not firearms. It was firecrackers. I know the first thing that anybody heard they said I'm sorry that wasn't a gun at all. It was just a bunch of high powered firecrackers. Just going, you know, pop pop pop pop. You know what I mean? Like more ridiculous sounding than like just some stupid audio effects in it like a Tom and Jerry cartoon or something. You know what I mean. He said that the first thing that you can hear on everybody's cellphone video that, that the government or whoever wants us to believe is gunshots he said that's the most ridiculous thing we ever heard nobody even reacted at first不要 because we were just like oh, that's just firecrackers. en en he says that for absolute sure he knows for a fact that the gunfire that was coming from different angles is different types of guns and that it wasn't just coming from that window up there at the hotel. So whatever they did there, whether they were shooting blanks or whatever the hell they did, he's telling us for sure that first they did firecrackers nobody paid attention, they were still listening to the music. Then they did some sort of, you know, something shooting blanks or something or maybe shooting shooting into something or shooting, you know, not even shooting into the crowd or something, but it is for absolute sure that his opinion is that gunfire was coming from three different angles, not just whatever the guy's name was up in the window. Stephen, Stephen, Stephen, Stephen Paddock. Yeah, Stephen Paddock or what? Well, you know, we do have a video where there's a guy in the crowd shooting, but he's obviously firing blanks. Nobody was shot. There were no victims. They faked the obituaries. They were based on persons who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death. I mean, we have done a quite a thorough job on this. Listen, I greatly valuing our conversations and I want to continue. I want us to do another, but I want them to run about the same blanks so that we have about five minutes or so. Yeah, to try to gather any loose ends. It, go ahead. You tell me if you have any questions about what we talked about and we'll just do kind of a Q&A right now to. Well, I think that the audience would write like more about your identity and I'm willing to go with your just your identification is Ashley J Olsen. You have used that name. Okay, so my name is Althea. Okay, my, my middle name is, it's not my middle name, but it's, it's in recognition of somebody I know that's an older relative is Jeffries. Okay, I come from the Robert family, but I am married to an Olsen. Now, my husband and I are extremely progressive. So I don't really, I take his name sometimes, but I don't, you know, I don't always officially take his name. So he's related to, you know, some of the acting family, you know, that's grown up and I know them too. I'm related to another acting family and it's through one of the two agencies that are in Salt Lake City. So there's a couple of acting agencies and it's not as big as Los Angeles, Los Angeles probably has. Oh my God, I don't know, maybe 40 different acting agencies. But we've got a very big acting base here, movies come here all the time. And, you know, I mean, it's such a big thing. They say that for every dollar, that the, something like for every dollar that they, that the acting, you know, the production companies or whatever, come for that they take off on their taxes. They're putting $11 into the, what is it called? The gross product or whatever you call it of the state of Utah. So yeah, it's like a, it's like a big thing and, you know, I would try to give you a link to my uncles. I don't know this. This is what you've said is certainly falling for now. I just want to review the bidding on the key point about your desire that this should be made public and that, yeah, that this has the character of an affidavit or a deposition that you, you attest that everything you've told me is true to your, the best of your knowledge and ability, which, which frankly, I believe everything you said, you've seen to be, you're, you're exceptionally perceptive and you have a very broad understanding of these issues and I, I find you a tremendously valuable resource. Well, the thing is is that it's because I know people in the entertainment industry. I know people in law enforcement. I know people, you know, that have run for president on a third party ticket against Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. So I have a lot of experience with politics. I have experienced with the acting community. I have a lot of experience with the musical community around the country. I play a few different musical instruments and I've talked to, you know, people, people that are into politics and the music, you know, that have a lot of political content in their songs, kind of just like the hippies of the 60s had, you know, a lot of political songs and anti war songs. I was a grateful dead head. I probably saw about 15 grateful dead shows and, you know, the grateful dead is, you know, I don't know if anybody knows it, but they were kind of forced to stop at some point by the CIA because they didn't, the CIA didn't like the community. The people were forming almost kind of like their own communities where everybody had their own actual, the people that follow the grateful dead had their own economy going. I want us to conclude here with the anticipation of doing our next installment. Okay. Perhaps tomorrow or the day after, but no later. Does that sound good to you? That sounds good to me. Well, I think you're terrific and I'm very grateful to you for speaking with me. Well, we can do it anytime, you know, that we're not, you know, that we both have some time or whatever. Yeah. And I don't know how much I can add, but I'm just going to leave it at the fact that, you know, it's getting to the point where something's going to break, something's going to happen because there's enough evidence that I think even the mainstream media, if you approach them the right way, we'll have to at least address a few things. You know what I mean? Yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, my God. Yes. My God, we've been playing for all these years and from so many directions and for such a mal-leveled reason. Oh, I can't thank you enough. Okay. Well, just let everybody know, you know, I think the main things are to, you know, just go with what the government and the mainstream media themselves said about Sandy Hook and call them on it saying, wait a minute, you said this and then you said this. Yes. Which one is it? And, you know, if you have the guts, get it, get a hold of the new town police and, you know, complain about Shannon Hicks and say, you know, this woman is metal. Some what were you doing, letting her in to this supposed crime scene? You know, you guys should be held accountable for letting her in there. If this was a real event, what type of police officer would let a civilian in to snap photographs of these crime children? And I think we should just, you know, question the new town B send them an email. You don't have to be rude to them or anything. And, you know, call them at night sleep, but ask them sternly and, you know, kind of with conviction to answer your questions, find this Laura Williams or anybody else, you think might be some sort of an instigator and an agitator and co-entail pro or control opposition. And, you know, if they're going to do it to all of us and ban us from Facebook and everybody's going to report us, how about if we just start reporting them? I like it. That's what I think. I love it. I love it. Well, it's too many. We're going to have Laura Williams, a.k.a. Vlad, who, you know, we may want to be the toy ducks to everybody. I think we want to discuss that in yet another round. So I thank you for tonight. I'm going to stop recording and tell you how much I appreciate this right now. Okay. That sounds great. Everybody take care.