Kalergi Plan, Hour 2 Zionist Globalism Brandon Martinez on Red Ice TV

Video Transcript:

We're kicking off the second hour here with Brandon Martinez. Welcome back everybody. Thank you so much for joining us and we are talking about the new additions, new chapters of his book, Grand Deceptions. And it was really two points that I wanted to raise about the issues we discussed so far in the first segment. And one was regarding, I guess, people's inability really to the fact that they have a really hard time to see the deeper dimensions to some of the things that we talked about, right? I usually make the example when this comes up of talking about someone, you know, it's Sweden, for example. They don't really wear geopolitically perhaps they're very, you know, one dimensional in their attitudes and their understanding of this. They basically can see right in front of their eyes that immigrants are coming into the country. This is changing things. And they can probably they can put, you know, Muslims or Islam as a kind of a permanent prominent tenant of that basically. And it's actually quite difficult to, on one hand, reach these people I've noticed too. It's on one hand, I'm expressing kind of an understanding for what some of these people are going through. You know, they can see that their country is being transformed and they're going straight to the first thing that's in front of their eyes, right? Because if you begin to talk about, you know, that there's Zionists involved in this or somehow, you know, that there's a Jewish supremacist elite that are pushing these things or transform, I mean, they literally, they look at you like you're from Mars or something, you know, because this is antithetical to what they think is going on. They even, if they're even aware enough, if they're, if they're queued up on the propaganda that they've been told, they might even go so far as saying, well, wait a minute, now you're sounding like them, right? Now you're sounding like, you know, a Nazi Muslim or something like that. So it's very difficult, Brandon, to reach people kind of on a deeper, you know, deeper geopolitical level and say to them, basically, look at what's going on. Have you thought about how to approach those kinds of people? What to say to them to open up their mind? I've noticed that in certain instances, it is actually good to begin on the, on the Muslim issue because at, because at some point, hopefully, at the end of that, they are actually going to ask the questions themselves, but wait a minute. Like, who actually brought this about? Like, right, even, even the issues that Tommy Robinson and Paul Weston are pushing in these days with Pegueta, hopefully, if people are inquisitive enough, we lead them to say, well, someone obviously is responsible for this, right? What's your, what's your tactic in this regard? Well, I think just explaining the, the basic principles of self-determination, sovereignty, things like that are very easy to understand, they're very basic, and there are things that most people can agree with if you don't engage in any kind of extreme as rhetoric. Unfortunately, on, on the so-called right wing, there are these kind of reprobate elements that are very brash in denigrating anyone that's not white, right? So you have people, you know, clansmen and, and, and Christian identity and so forth that are just brazenly attacking anything that's not white and using racial slurs and so forth. And that's, sometimes that's sponsored from the top to discredit legitimate, national, legitimate concerns with immigration. But so, unfortunately, there's basically these, these two problem elements in that movement. It's, it's those extremists and then it's also these kosher phony nationalists that aren't really nationalists because they, they're only for a civic nationalism that wants people to assimilate to this, this cultural Marxist culture of extreme liberalism and tolerance and, and whatever, right? So you have those phonies who are being paid by Zionist to, to put out a half-baked analysis of this where they're only focusing on Islam, even though some of these migrants aren't Muslim and, and, and, and their, their main critiques of why Muslims shouldn't come is that Muslims aren't liberal enough, Muslims are pro-gay enough, Muslims aren't pro-Jewish enough, Muslims aren't pro-Israel enough, right? So they, it's just a wrong analysis, it's just the wrong way to approach it. If you, if you take that as the, the, the, the window to your trying to bring new people in here, they're actually going to fall down the wrong path and they're going to join EDL, they're going to join Pagida, they're going to become pro-Israel neocons and, and that's what we see happening, right? We see Pagida is like the number one group, who's, who's, who's, they're getting pushed, right? They're getting pushed as the alternative that if you feel this way, if you disheartening about what's happening, go to this group over here, right? That's, that's the one that's going to get ready to fun-lull that, you know, anger that you have. Right. It's the steam valve and they're, they're controlling it. Right. And all of these guys get on the mass media, Tommy Robinson's, all over the media, right? He's promoted everywhere. He gets the attention. Why? Because he, himself, admittedly, is a Zionist. He wore a pin that says, I am a Zionist. And then he said, he left the EDL because there was some quote, far-right elements, presumably people who don't like Israel, right? And, and, and that's why he left the EDL. He joined this phony group called Killian, which is this fake Zionist-backed, like Muslim group that portray themselves as like these reform has to be really, they're just like cultural Marxists of the Muslim world, right? Promoting pro gay, pro feminism and so forth. They're, they're funded by the British government. So they're, they're really orchestrating this from both ends. They fund the Islamic salafi extremists like the cha, the chaudry type to put them on the media. Then they fund the EDL to be the kosher opposition to only point the finger at Islam. And, and then they block out all the genuine legitimate nationalist, people like the, the Jobic party in, in the Hungary, the Golden Dawn in Greece and others who, who have a pretty much a good analysis of this, a well-rounded analysis. They talk, they talk about the foreign policy issue. They talk about the, the, the Zionists and their involvement in all of this. And that, that has to be a focus of it because it really doesn't do much good in just blaming symptoms for things, right? It's like, it's like, it's like, it's like talking about ISIS and condemning ISIS, but then ignoring all of this shadow sponsorship of ISIS, ignoring where it all comes from, ignoring the, you know, you know, and planning, ignoring all of the factors involved that, that brought this about. You're really not really talking about anything if you don't bring up those things. So I think we have to focus on the overall agenda. We don't have to be brash about it or just say like, Jew every, every other sentence, right? But, but, but, yes, you have to, every time, all the time, Jew, Jew, Jew. Oh, I'm just joking. Now, but there are people like that. That's what kind of bring it up. And I think that in some cases, it's like, again, yes, there is legitimate criticism. But if we are serious about, you know, attracting people to, I don't even know what to call it at this stage, to be honest, a movement, an idea, a concept, a legitimacy of the fact that, you know, people in their own countries, as they are, is a, is a pretty damn good idea to stop, you know, conflict and religious, you know, warfare and all these kinds of things that we're seeing blooming out right now. In other words, if you're, if you're, you know, for, for, for peace and stability and security and all these kinds of things, right? And, and being able to raise your family in a somewhat calm environment, you know, mass immigration is, is not going to help along in that process. So basically, to try to attract people to that, as a, as a legitimate, legitimate idea, there's going to be many groups coming and going and all that kind of stuff. But the fact is, you have to be wise in terms of how you, how you try to attract people to that idea. And in some regards, I can, I can see, as I said, before the first level, criticism of this is an important step, right? I mean, you can't just jump from, you know, first square to the 10th right away and you have to walk through some of these passage, you have to grow and develop on your own, right? So at the very least, if you can have an initial awakening, so to speak, that is like, wait a minute, what's going on here? All these people are coming in, they don't, you know, they criticize us as native, you know, native Europeans or whatever. Then that's a good step in the right direction. You don't have to hit them with a hammer about the Jew over the head right away. In some cases, they might actually scare them away, and make them go in the opposite direction, right? I mean, as they say, you can only show someone the door and hopefully they will, they will go through it themselves. But I think it's an important step. I mean, I agree with you 100% with what you're saying that at the end of the day, at the end of the, you know, of the of the lesson, if you will, we have to point to the real cause of what's going on. But hopefully there is a drive enough in people that they actually want to try to understand, as opposed to just reacting to a symptom rather than the cause, right? But unfortunately, a lot of that initial rhetoric gets hijacked and I see a lot of compromising on the side of these right people who will actually kind of promote some of the zio-con, theo-con narratives, and go along with it because it benefits their agenda, right? So for me, that's kind of unprincipled where they're don't they don't even care about the truth about certain events, about certain issues, but if it benefits their agenda, they'll promote it, right? And that happens on both ends, right? That has on on the cultural Marxist end or the the anti-imperialist end where they'll like go along with some of these anti-white narratives, right? But then on the other end you have some of these white nationals who go along with these Zionist narratives about Islam and things like that. So you have compromises on both ends. Nobody wants to look at the big picture, nobody wants to be true to, you know, the facts, they just want to push an agenda. And that's kind of why I called my website non-aligned media, right? Because I take some of my principles from the non-aligned movement, which was this Cold War movement of countries that didn't want to be puppets of America and they didn't want to be puppets of the Soviet Union either. So they created this non-aligned movement where they said we're rejecting both of these hegemonies and we want to forge our own path, right? So I don't like getting sucked into one camp or the other. I want to talk about the actual agendas being pursued. I want to explain, of course, that every people has a right to their own land, to their own country. We can work all these problems, it'll cordially. But I think what's happening is that there's definitely a real case to be made for a geopolitical alliance to be made with the Arab Islamic world, not in terms of immigration and accepting them as immigrants, but more on a geopolitical level. And really they're going to alienate that and completely ruin that if they start adopting these Zion-con narratives about Islam and terrorism and a lot of this stuff is manipulation. So it's a very difficult spot that these people are put in. I mean, it's not just Islamic immigration. I mean, it's all immigration. I don't care if they can do or if they're if they're Christian Africans. The point is it's not even just a religious thing, right? So cultures cannot survive if you have masses of people from a different ethnic group, from a different culture moving in in huge numbers. Nobody would accept millions and millions of white Christians moving into Japan or moving into some African country. They would reject that, right? They do reject that. Those countries actually are homogenous. It's only Europe that is forced to accept quote unquote diversity. And the issue of diversity can be easily deconstructed as well because there's plenty of diversity within the European group, right? There's people with pale skin and tan and olive skin and blue eyes and brown eyes and brown hair and blonde hair and red hair, right? So there's plenty of diversity within the group that there's no need to bring in more quote unquote diversity, right? There's already plenty within the group. And just on the cultural level and the historical level in terms of traditions, all these countries in Europe should be preserved as they are. There's no need to bring masses of anybody here for economic reasons. Whatever reason they come up with, it's bogus, right? Yeah, that's right. It doesn't matter what reason they come up with. The purpose is the point is all people should have self-determination. I support it for the Palestinians and I've been outspoken and supporting their rights, which Israel has been stifling and destroying. But it's also true for Europeans. Why should Sweden or Switzerland or Austria pay the price for the US foreign policy? Right. But that seems to be what's happening and we're being pushed into different camps. And then unfortunately there's a lot of wrong-headed analysis on both ends of this from people who are just anti-Zionist and people who are just white nationalists or whatever, right? So I try to like give a big picture analysis and explain the faults of both ends and the pitfalls of both sides of this. I mean, there's definitely things we could learn from the Islamic world. At least they organize themselves and stand up for themselves in their own countries when they're being attacked, right? The Palestinians are defending themselves against an incursion against an occupation, a brutal terrorist occupation against on their people and their land, which has been usurped and destroyed from the beginning, starting with a mass immigration of Jews to Palestine. So that's a lesson, right? That's a lesson for us. Of course, what I find funny about some of this too is that there is a kind of a hard core. Oh, it seems to, I don't know, maybe just a handful to be honest, but there's kind of a national socialist kind of core of people who, it's funny because obviously when you begin to look at national socialism and some of the revisionism and see what happened, you see some of the the lineup of people involved and even the alliances that were forged between Germany at that time and many other countries. Obviously, there was a cooperation with parts of the Arab world. It was obviously with Italy, with Japan and all these kinds of things, right? And it's almost like, as you said before, there's like, if there's an unwillingness just to even cooperate with someone just because they're brown or whatever, then it's like, well, wait a minute, this is not true to, of course, the national socialist effort of what they did. They realized that they were in a situation where they didn't have the luxury. They couldn't afford that, basically. They had to go into alliances with people. And I'm quite interested in that too. And you know, it's actually a question I had for you here. If there is an opportunity, actually to forge a partnership in that way because we have a common enemy here, right? I mean, there's something to that. And I'm thinking, unfortunately, as you've talked about here now, by bringing in these masses of immigrants, the more and more that happens, the less and less people are probably going to be likely to do that because it's creating such a rift between people that it's, you know, we just can't deal with it anymore. It's a shame, isn't it? Right. And that's exactly what they intended for this immigration plan was to create these divides between Westerners and Arab Muslims. And then there's extremists on both ends who play into that. And one of the things is that the Western world is so decrepit and has been taken over by, you know, cultural Marxists and Zionists and Nealcons. So they have both angles covered. They have the foreign policy uncovered. And they also have the internal cultural thing covered and the mass immigration thing covered. And they want all the bases covered. But sometimes they kind of tolerate people who only talk about one thing, right? So they'll tolerate like a guy who's against mass immigration so long as he's directing his angst against Islam and only Islam. But then on the other end, they'll tolerate a guy like Jeremy Corbyn, who's pretty good on foreign policy, but then he's four mass open borders, right? Right. They're willing to compromise with some of these guys. So long as they have one of the issues they want, but we can talk about all of the issues, explain why all of them are destructive. And both things feed each other. The war-mongering foreign policy feeds the immigration, which was already happening before this so-called migrant crisis for decades, right? It's not just the migrant crisis. That's a pinnacle of a longstanding, collergy-eight plan to literally displace the peoples of Europe, destroy their cultures and bring in a slave, global slave race. And that is a main tenant of this agenda. So on that level, Europeans are literally a target of a genocidal plan. And that's something that needs to be to be emphasized for sure. But in terms of making alliances, I think that Muslims are very aware and attuned to what's going on. So if you're average, if you look at your average western or your average white person in the West, they're just completely clueless, right? They don't know what's going on. They don't care what's going on. They're consumed by materialism and degeneracy, right? So we can learn a lot of things from these Islamic world. It doesn't mean that we should mass import Muslims, obviously not, that's not a reasonable policy. But there are things that they're doing right, which is causing them to be a target, right? So on the cultural level, there are far more reserved and conservative, and that acts as a roadblock against globalism, against the degeneracy, against vice, which is the downfall of the West. The West is eroding from within, because we've all been trained to only concern ourselves with issues of money and material possessions and selfishness and greed and aberus. This is what the minds that they want us to have, because that what that does is it takes you away and out of the element of culture, right? They don't want you to have any inclinations towards culture, people, even religion, right? If you have an indigenous religion, the pagan religions, and so forth, they don't want that either, because any kind of rootedness is a roadblock to globalism and open borders, and this global government that they want to set up. So on that level, I think we should not just engage in pure Islam bashing, which feeds Zionism, neo-conservatism, and is also kind of propelling cultural Marxist memes in terms of their mean to gays and women and so forth. But at the same time, there are legitimate critiques to be made of certain factions of Islam that are acting badly in Europe. Fine, those people should be criticized, and in fact, in some cases, in some cases, especially these salafists, they should be deported. If they want Sharia law, they can go to Saudi Arabia, they can go to Islamic State if that's what they want. Don't come to Europe and demand something that's not made of here, right? That's just a simple reality, and those people should be criticized. So I'm all for that. I'm just not for the very narrow pro-Nealcon, pro-Israel garbage that's being spewed by the likes of Robinson and Pagida and so forth, right? Well, it's in terms of efficiency as well. You can thrash that the branches all you want, but you're not going to get to the root of the problem, and that has to be addressed. The wheels of history are turning here, and they're turning pretty rapidly, and I can see the frustration with this. I can see that there's too much at stake at this point, and it's late in the hour, and to some, to try to unravel what to them, I think, is more or less a kind of a gourdy and not. There's something that they see as pointless. And if they can point to something which proves the general point that we've been saying here that incompatible culture shouldn't be together or forced together in this way, then they choose to go in that direction. So frankly, I understand them, but I'm completely on your page too, that at the end of the day, does involve what actually is the truth here and what actually is happening, and we have to forge a way, even if that's kind of a new path through a certain extent, that brings up both sides, that brings up the possibility of cooperation with people, but then also the ability to let people wake up to the cultural Marxist agenda and the incursion of Islam, the promotion of Islam in the West as well. So I'm with you there in that sense. It's like you have to juggle many of these things at the same time, because it's never really just a black and white issue, although sometimes to break it down in those terms is beneficial to open up the mind of people, but only for so far, because if you continue on that path, you'll probably be manipulated by powers higher than us. Right, making a geopolitical alliance is not have to entail importing half the Indian subcontinent to Europe, right? Right. It's just a common sense thing, and some people don't don't get it, and a lot of people don't want to look at that angle, unfortunately, on both sides. So I try to combat some of the wrong headed analysis on the white nationalists, but also on the anti-Zionist and who are only focusing on that who don't want to acknowledge that there are other people that are being affected by globalism other than just Arabs and Muslims, right? Right, exactly. I think too they've been so unaccustomed to taking their own side that I think to them, it's kind of a liberation to take your own side. And frankly, don't give a shit about anybody else. You know what I mean? We've been programmed, leasing the West for such a long time, that you can't care about yourself or the interests of your own people. So I think it's almost like it's kind of a ferocious reaction to that to go on the extreme opposite. And again, I think that can actually be good in the short term to liberate yourself from those restraints that have been put on us, political correctness and all these things, and just like throw off those shackles. That's fine. I'm okay with that. But in the long term, it would be very detrimental, I think, to discount the possibility of forging partnerships with people who ultimately at the end of the day might have the same objective more or less in in that, or even if it's just working together a certain a certain bit of the path, if you will, right? Up to a certain point and then, you know, you achieve a common goal and then you go your separate ways. Nothing wrong with that. Right. I think that the basic principle here is that mass immigration of Muslims into Europe is not a good thing, but wars against the Muslim world. It's not a good thing either. And both of these things can be achieved at the same time. It's not like it's impossible. No, these two policies, these two policies are actually very, very much in concert with each other at the end of the day, because one agenda feeds the other, right? I mean, it's something that they're doing simultaneously as a dual headed approach to achieve long term objectives. Everything they do is long term. It's they plan these things out in the round table groups and their think tanks and the brain trusts that they come up with and plan these things out and we match that. And that's the thing, right? We have to match that. We can't just we can't just react short term to something. I think that's going to solve the situation. I mean, we have to step up to the plate here and really start to formulate something which serves as a true opposition to this. Otherwise, we won't make it. Right. And I think take I always have taken a moralistic approach, because it really is the best way to to reach out to people if you do show empathy for for other people around the world and condemn the wrong of your own. There's there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's called introspection. It doesn't have to lead to self-hate or whatever. That's where it gets exploited by cultural Marxists is where they want to exploit like extreme introspection to the point where everybody within an ethnic group is guilty for the actions of some, that's being exploited to push that agenda. But then on the other end, they want us to have zero concern for anything going on overseas, done in our name, by our governments. So I think we can have a moralistic approach, have a moral forum policy and also oppose the agenda to destroy Europe, to displace and create dissolution and chaos within Europe, because that's also completely immoral. It's completely immoral what they're doing. This is destruction of entire peoples. So on both ends, a moral argument wins the day in both in both respects. So I think it's good to condemn the evils of one's own government. That's a very good thing. And that's one of the things that we criticize about Jews, right, is that they're so clannish and tribal that they overlook the faults of their own. They deny the crimes of their own leadership, their own people, and they have zero introspection whatsoever. And that leads to an unhinged ethnic chauvinism and narcissism that leads to schizophrenia, right? It just leads to insane narcissism and self-aggrandizement. And that is so unhealthy on a psychological way. It's unhealthy even for them, for the wrong group. And I think it would all be a lot of hurt. Clearly, look at what's happened to them throughout history in terms of any places they've been thrown out of. Clearly, that's a reason for that. It's not just some kind of weird pathological virus on behalf of the Europeans, so all of a sudden was struck by some mental illness to get an idea to throw out the Jews, right? They were infected with some bizarre disease called anti-Semitism. That's right. But I think that on that level, some people fall into that trap within the whole white nationalist fold. They become very similar to that where they say, basically, there's nothing about whites or European history that can be criticized. It's all good. It's all 100 percent fine. We're the best. We're superior, etc. So we're seeing I don't like that kind of holier than thou attitude. He kind of leads to narcissism and selfishness. But at the same time, whatever happened in the past that doesn't justify erasing one's people, one's culture, even if Europeans were the worst people of all time, that still wouldn't justify mass immigration and the browning of the West, so to speak, because the descendants of people who did wrong are not the same people. They're not guilty of the same things. There's various ways that they're exploiting that to promote discredit whites and promote white guilt or whatever. But at the same time, I think we can be concerned about the character of people, because there's a thinker called Julius Ola. He was a right-wing thinker, but he was very critical of some aspects of national socialism. He argued in a concept about the race of the spirit, race of the soul, where it's not just enough to be a certain background. You also have to be a decent person to be accepted into his group or whatever. So if it's just about race or whatever, then George Bush is good because he's white. Then Dick Cheney is good because he's white. Despite that there are traders to their own people, they're still good. It has to be about ethnicity is important. It cultures important. I think you can't set the bar so low that you just accept any criminal and just a violent person that wants to join up with your cause. I think you have to discriminate a little bit and look for decent people that do have a moral approach, but also are pathological altruists who just want to erase their own culture because of past rocks. As usual, the truth is somewhere in between the balance is necessary. In fact, I think we would go so far to say that the traits that is devoid from the kind of narcissism and fanatical ethnocentrism that we see, for example, in many people that are Jews, to disassociate yourself from that would be one of the virtues, that would be a good example to lead by. In other words, pull in a different direction and show a different quality as a human. One of the things I wanted to mention as well is going back to Colurgate because he spoke about two certain things of this as well in his, I think it was in practical idealism. 1920 was 25, I think it was published. Anyway, he wrote about the, I forget the exact term. I'm actually looking at one of the pages to pull out some culture right now. I'm trying to find it here, but he was basically talking about the quality on a moral stance of the Jewish people. He saw them as a future nobility in these kinds of things. He saw that they were the moral guiding light of Europe and things like this. He actually seen this repeated many times in different kinds of literature, even in movies. He's come up, made a note of that several times. But one of the things is obviously they managed to do in terms of ending up in a position of leadership within the European Union is evident in the amount of organizations that they managed to actually pull together just to dictate European policy. I made a note of this too and wrote up some of them. Let me just run some of these bio here so you can hear them. So they have the European Jewish Parliament. They have the European Jewish Congress, the European Jewish Association, European Council of Jewish Communities, European Association of Jewish Community Centers, CEJI, a Jewish contribution to an inclusive Europe, the European Association for Jewish Studies, the European Jewish Fund, European Union of Jewish Students, European Jewish Press, European Jewish Call for Reason. We have, of course, a paidia that's based out of Stockholm, the European Institute for Jewish Studies, and also the European Parliament working group on anti-Zemitism. I mean, it's just remarkable when you think about it, right? I mean, that they even have their own European Jewish Parliament, their own European Jewish Congress, and they are perfectly okay with having an organization, a group within hours that is there to just promote their own ethnic interest. While if we were to do this, we would be instantly demonized as being the most bigoted racist, white supremacist Nazis ever. It's just remarkable to me. What do you think about that in terms of how much they've managed to establish themselves already in a position of leadership just as Callergy kind of urged them to do? Right. That was essential tenant of Callergy's plan was to have them be a spiritual nobility and an ethnic overclass who would rule over the masses of Eurasian, Negroid plebs. That was his exact words. So that's effectively almost exactly the scenario that has unfolded toity just as all their prescriptions about the Middle East and the New Pearl Harbor have come to pass and the Oded Yenon plan. They write down what they're going to do and then they see to it that it happens in the world. And these organizations that are all central. Of course, they form a shadow government in Europe promoting these ideals of Callergy. Then obviously there was the organization called Pidea which was established by Barbara Specter, the infamous Barbara Specter who made the famous statement or she says, Europe must become multicultural and multiracial evidently and that Jews would be central in leading this effort and would be resented for their leading role. So she was openly stating that people of her kin would be the leaders in the effort to transform the continent to make it more friendly to them, make it more palatable for them to be the leader class to rule the roost. And this is crazy. This is insane hootspa. I think this is what they call it hootspa where they advocate one thing for their own and the exact opposite for others. So they're the most nationalistic racist tribalist clandish people in the world who have their own ethno state in the Middle East which they created and forged through terrorism and ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. They literally drove 800,000 Palestinians from their homes. They committed massacres. They murdered women and children. They literally in some cases drove Palestinians into the sea. Literally if you read the book, the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, there's many examples of that. They committed bombings and atrocities to create their ethno state which they've been bolstering ever since by weakening their enemies. So they reject any immigration into Israel. They actually put blacks migrants from Africa in concentration camps and holding pens where they then deport them very soon afterwards. During this civil war in Syria, which Israel was central and instigating and promoting and they've been helping ISIS, they have constructed a wall on their eastern border with Jordan to block Syrian refugees from getting into Israel and they have condemned any migrants going to Israel as quote unquote, infield traders and one Israeli and P actually called Africans cancer. So they have extreme hate speech against blacks against Arab migrants who come into their country, a country that was forged through terrorism very legitimately. And at the same time, they are spearheading the effort to send these people to Europe. In fact, there's an Israeli there's an Israeli organization besides all that the Jewish organization that you mentioned is called Israel aid. It's an Israeli disaster relief NGO and they've actually sent a team to Europe to help refugees enter Greece. So this is the most brazen hypocrisy that you can possibly find on any issue anywhere. They advocate the exact opposite policies one for themselves and one for the Gentiles and this idea about the spiritual mobility, their supremacy, they believe in that they're the chosen people who will be a light unto the nations. Right? That is a concept in Judaism that Jews are the elect, the elite, the chosen, the people who have a moral high ground, which is absurd because what what moral high ground killing Palestinians, dropping white phosphorus, murdering their enemies, causing awards. It's not really a moral high ground, but they're so delusional and schizophrenic that this it's amazing that they've convinced themselves that this is all is normal. Isn't that like as a trait kind of like of a of a psychopathic individual? I mean, again, I know that this doesn't it doesn't extend to the entire group. I mean, we always need to mention that. I think you did as well, but you know, but in terms of the the spearheading elite leadership here, that's pushing things in this direction. I think there's even a tenant there of these that core group that seems more or less to be psychopathic, right? The very aspect that you try to put on others is something that you, you know, kind of avoid in yourself, right? You always blame you, you project all the time, basically, and you try to get, you know, what you what you see in others and blame them for, you can't possibly recognize in yourself because it would it would ruin what you're doing. I mean, it's it's remarkable that it's gone this far, to be honest. Well, there are the masters of the culture of critique as Kevin MacDonald, update. So there, there are the leading critics of Islam, of Christianity, of whites and in other ethnic groups, but they they never accept any criticism of their own group and they say it's all anti-Semitism and if you criticize them, you're just an irrational hater who is just jealous of their success. So that is the most extreme form of narcissism and and some of the things I mentioned in the chapter on this are remarkable. Some of the statements that were made there was an Israeli rabbi whose name is Barok Efrati and he said the Islamization of Europe was punishment against Christians for persecuting the Jews. He said, he said, he said, we should rejoice that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us hundreds of years while we were in exile. And then he then he invoked the Holocaust and so forth and this is a recurring thing. They invoked the Holocaust which is questionable and it's too big a topic to get into here but they used they have a revenge fantasy right. So they they they hold these thousand-year grudges right. They're still upset about the the inquisition in Spain so therefore. Yes it's like it's like this religious thing right. I will smite Dynced from the face of the earth for like a thousand years. It's like it's like oh fucking relax buddy we just you know we had a grudge with you here. Yeah it's it's an unbelievable rage in hatred and and amazingly that were the haters for simply criticizing their own hatred and there's another there was another guy who was on YouTube a rabbi who gave a sermon he gave more of a theological argument. He says the Islamization of Europe is a good because Christianity or Christians and majority of which are I guess in Europe he says are they represent Edom which is a big biblical group enemy of the Israelites and they must be destroyed in order to bring back the Jewish Messiah to earth. Right exactly. And and you see this theme throughout these these rabbinical leaders say this in fact there is a rabbi his name is Dov Lear you'll have to the Paris attacks. He said it was justified and he hailed it and he said this is payback for the Holocaust. Yes there you go. It's this is just insane hatred. There's a guy named Jack Engelhardy wrote in the Aruch Shiva publication he says he says the 800,000 migrants going to Germany will raise the total number of Muslims living in Germany to six million the same number of Jews that the Germans sent to the gas chambers. Marley a generation ago we called it karma and a trade Muslims for Jews that Germany will rule. Oh my god well actually they didn't send that many to the gas chambers that he didn't exist but let's not talk about that so. Right they don't care if it happened or not it's all of them. No of course. Yeah it's all about creating the myths that benefit the group which I also cover in Grand Deceptions a lot of the distortions of that history. It's all manipulation to elevate themselves to a position of preeminence. They want to rule the Gentile they want to control they want to own the wealth of the world and you know suck the milk of the Gentiles as it says in the Old Testament and that's precisely what they're doing. There's this guy named Gregor Gizzy a guy a Jewish politician in Germany and he had a video he put out where he advocated an unrestricted opening of the borders to refugees and he invoked the Nazi era and said because of this history we have to be nice to welcoming to all refugees, all immigrants anywhere no matter what. And said and then he went on to say more native Germans die than are born and then he welcomed this phenomenon and said it's this is a very fortunate Nazis are not good at having offspring. So he's he's generalized all Germans are Nazis right I mean it's like saying all Jews are are Israeli workers. He he he supports Israel. He he supports Israel as a Jewish state as a majority Jewish state. I mean yeah there's a small minority of Arabs I guess there's like 10 15% Arabs in Israel who are abused and beaten down and have absolutely no rights but he he he advocates mass immigration literally the dissolution of Germany and German culture based on his revenge vanishes of the Holocaust and that's what feeds into cultural Marxism that's the very basis in foundation of their ideology is this Holocaust religion which serves as their imbodies for revenge against all Europeans right. Right that's why it's so important I think to to dare to address it and to talk about it and we haven't many you know shows in the past but it's really the same thing there we again we don't have to get into it now because it's such a big topic but just as a general idea that the there's such a layer to kind of pierce through to be able to reach people on a reasonable level when it comes to this issue right that that's really what it comes to I think it's a kind of an emotional programming that has occurred that there's a tendency to people to immediately want to disassociate themselves from that because it just evokes such horrible feelings in them or something like that and it's it's unfortunate but we have to do what we you know we have to address what the truth is right I mean that's at the very least that's what we have to go on right I mean you can make determinations that that you see are beneficial at the end maybe for survival reasons perhaps but at the end of it it's still like is it true or not and in this case it's not they've they've they've they've retracted some of these camps on one and a half million people I mean that so the death toll can possibly can't possibly be six million here there's all these discrepancies and problems with the story right and I mean it's just yeah it's religious religious narrative right right literally a myth that was created and had been put out there in the early 1900s and going back to the late 1800s where Zionists were promoting the idea that six million Jews were being persecuted and this was actually being used as fundraising fodder for colonization efforts in Palestine that's what all this is about they wanted to create a myth that guilt trip the world into paying for the Jewish state and carving it out and never criticizing it by just invoking this the sob story that would be used as psychological a psychological sledgehammer against anyone who who criticizes Israel and there was actually an Israeli former MP named Sholamitalani who went on democracy now and she said she said the any semi-conard is a trick against our critics and whenever we're doing something wrong aka slaughtering Palestinians we just invoke the Holocaust because it's so useful so that's a free pass you know it's the card you bring out and you can you can do anything you want you know right and in this basically underlines everything that they do it's it's almost replaced Judaism as their secular religion and that's why this nutcase named Noel Ignatiev who is the a former professor at Harvard he made a magazine in 1994 called Race Trader and he the tagline for this was treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity and then he said you explain that this was decronicle and analyze the making remaking and unmaking of whiteness now what if somebody said that about Jews said right now treason to Jewishness is loyalty to humanity and this magazine is out to unspend Jewish Jewishness and in abolish Judaism right that would be condemned as anti-Semitism of the worst kind possible but he was able to be a professor and to spew this stuff and then he you know he he spewed all kinds of very hateful things against whites and there's there's also like multiple articles that came out recently that I cover like this one in the foreign policy magazine right David Rothkoff David Rothkoff who was an influential Zionist he wrote an article called the end of an era for white race oh yeah I remember that one cheese and he hailed the prospect of whites becoming a minority in in the in the next few decades yeah and said this was was essentially a good thing well let me let me it's a good you're on a good track that but let me just put something in here in between as well because equally as we talked about how you know many have a folly of not recognizing or play or playing into the hands of these of the globalists the controllers the the people we're talking about here you also have then on top of this unfortunately huge group of people who are non-Europeans that also are very happy to play into to this right to to play into their hands to to sing along in the in the anti-white choir so to speak and whenever articles like this come out or whatever is going on in terms of blaming whites for all the problems in the world or whatever they line up like it's free candy or something you know to to to sing along in this choir and say yes you know praise the Lord here we go just like blame whites it's the same level there right that those people need to be reached as well that that you know to and told then you to be told about this fact that they are also being manipulated and used as pawns in this game to to bring something in which you know ultimately is going to be a horror scenario genocide you know right I think there's some issues where they just will sign with with the Jews and the Zionist to leap because they benefit from it right and it works on both ends there's you know that the mass immigration and the immigrants themselves are being used as cannon fodder and we're also being used as cannon fodder to fight wars for them in the Middle East I mean plenty of white Americans have gone and killed people in the Middle East they're doing the bidding of Israel so they're using all of us they're using us to fight their enemies then they're using the victims of wars to against us in this demographic time bomb that they're orchestrating to displace people right and and and secure this Imperium for themselves right so it's there's so many levels to it but I think all all these levels are important to discuss and and and people need to be brought to the truth and and you're right but I think we do need to reach out to to those people who are actually immigrants in Europe and probably some of them are our second generation I mean right what what are those people going to do you know they were just born there and oh they're they're their parents were perhaps pawns in this in this game that's being in this this this war that's being waged but they basically there's there's stuck between a rock and aarplac because what are they going to do you know just evict themselves and go back to some country that they've never been to right right that's very difficult the situation that's it's happened the best scenario I can come up with especially in North that the countries like North America Canada and the US and and Australia is just to to to to separate there's enough space in these territories for everybody right you don't need to all be mixed together that was one of the the critiques of Martin Luther King is that he was promoting mal he was promoting like an integration policy whereas he was this guy named George Lincoln Rockwell he he actually liked this guy named Malcolm X because Malcolm X was a black nationalist who wanted self-determination for blacks he didn't want integration he wanted self-determination right so again but look at who who pushed MLK as opposed to Malcolm X right so you know the holds the whole civil rights movement and all that the the fraud lawn I did a good video on that did some of the video work did the video work to that that actually went into the detail I didn't know that there was so much involvement specifically from the reform Judaism in terms of pushing MLK as this new hero of the age basically this gonna you know bring us to where we are today basically well they also made a demi got out of Nelson Mandela and it's very much the same situation and so the Africa they they they want to push the model of a melting pot which was a phrase that was coined by Israel Zangwill who was a Zionist who is a dedicated Jewish Zionist who advocated for a Jewish state for Jews only but then he was pushing multiculturalism mixing on on Gentiles the same the same ML every time so they want these these multi racial or multi-cultural societies and they don't want anybody to be separate because if they were separate then they would have like an in-group out-group thing going on and they would be excluded from it perhaps and they would and they would lead to what gas chambers and concentration camps right that's what they think that's their their delusions they will lead to that but they they if they believe that then they can go to Israel exactly but there you go right they won't they won't do that though because they don't want just Israel they they want everything they want the world right and it will is there oyster and so this we're we're kind of late here into this now but obviously this takes us with what you mentioned several times the union plan the idea of the great of greater Israel and all this kind of stuff maybe you can just summarize this somewhat shortly for us but what is this about then in context of Syria right is it about purging Syrians from Syria and expanding the territories of Israel at the end of the day do you think that's what's going on well I think they're they're trying to work that out themselves people have made this big deal this term greater Israel they've absolutely expanded their territory since Israel was created right they've launched these wars that in which they've seized territory from surrounding countries from Syria from Lebanon from Egypt they've continually taken land obviously from the Palestinians they continue to build settlements in the West Bank squeezing what's left the Palestine off the map they've wiped Palestine off the map while they accused Amaddi Nijad of saying that about Israel well they actually did it so they they they definitely want more land they want to control the resources of the region they want the oil it's not just western oil companies that want this oil Israel wants the oil Israel wants the water resources they want to dominate the whole arena that was why they put out that document in 1996 was called a clean break a new strategy for securing the realm and the way they would secure the realm for Israeli domination exploitation was to pit all their enemies against each other to break them down have them engage in sectarian inflighting and then they would just seize all the good the spools of war at the end of it and that's what they're doing in Syria right now the golon heights which they seized from Syria in I think it was a 1967 war they're actually mining for oil in that area in Israeli company that I think a Roth child is involved in that so that they're trying to take the oil there they're using the Syrian civil war as a cover to steal land to take resources from Syria they're plunders they want it all right they want to control the gas reserves off the coast of Gaza they want to do that but as far as expelling people from Syria to expand the territory deeper into Syria or into Jordan I don't think they can do that because it would just be too ridiculous like there's hundreds of millions of people that live in this area that they call greater Israel that's that's on the map there's just no way they could expel all these people and take over their land and hijack it and then get away with that I mean there's already a huge campaign called BDS which they're actually moving to ban here in the west in Canada they just put out a government motion saying BDS is bad and Britain they actually ban boycotting Israel in France you get arrested if you boycott Israeli goods so there's a huge movement against Israel so they they're having a difficult time with a PR war nobody likes Israel everybody's mobilizing against them so I think they're going to settle for like a smaller greater Israel something that's not given time given time do you think they have like I mean is it is a hubris are they overplaying their hand also to a certain extent I mean they're pushing so far and so hard on this that obviously I've seen a lot of people that I you know wouldn't expect to be on this page if you will to agree to look into it and and to walk to they've woken up to this issue and they realize what actually is going on in the Middle East and the Jewish supremacists that are pushing this in Europe etc I mean a lot of people are turning turning against them right I think you read that they are this called you know imperial hubris they they don't know when to stop and that was one of the downfalls of Hitler is that he had all these ideas about you know getting back territory that had been taken from Germany after World War one and restoring German honor and so forth but he he went too far with it and he ended up kind of gambling his way into a trap and and then it ended up destroying him right so he took he took back this Sudet and land and and and he's in northern parts of northern Poland but then he moved into all of western Poland and then he confronted France and then he attacked the Soviet Union so that that was sort of the the the phenomenon of a addicted gambler who just wants more right so the Zionists are doing the exact same thing they they just want more and more they're not satisfied with what they have even though they have everything that they could possibly want at this point in history they got their own ethno state they control well over 50% of the money power in the world yeah plus they're getting funded by the gory to to run Israel over there right right they get all their weapons and foreign aid from from the United States all of their wars post post 9-11 which they helped orchestrate is is being fought by Gentiles they've mobilized these well hobbyists through this corrupt gulf sheikhdom of Saudi Arabia to fight as mercenaries and useful idiots for them in Syria they're just manipulating everybody but at the same time so we're all falling to pieces while they're becoming a world leading world state and it's becoming so obvious that it's impossible to conceal and this is why they are moving to stifle internet freedom they they had a conference in Israel last year where they called for Chinese style internet censorship were service providers would pull entire websites that they claim are anti-Semitic right and and that's what we're heading towards a all-out or well-earned police state and that's what a lot of this phony ish stuff they're using as a cover to censor people like you and me people who are opposed to mass immigration people who are opposed to Zionism and neo-conform policy were all targets of this they want to they want to silence us that's right of course people are getting their you know abilities to to fund their efforts shut down and all kinds of horrible things but I still think at the end of the day brand and the more the more they push the specifically this kind of stuff the more it will de legitimize their effort and legitimize ours because people at the end of the day they they have a streak of of anti you know kind of establishment in them and I think we can use that we can we can work with that to our advantage I mean yes many people are still very much you know controlled by mainstream media or whatnot but geez there's been amazing you know awakening to this since the the dawn of the internet you know so I'm still positive about it you know right I mean there's a lot of information although they can't stop the internet it's impossible they they just cannot control it it's not within their power to do so and all this information is already out there it's already available it's it's it's it's everywhere you can't avoid it so that's why I was so stupid for them to go after a guy like Arthur Topham here in Canada the books he had on his website are on 50,000 different websites I mean shutting shutting him up is not gonna it's not gonna get rid of this information it's already out there they can't do anything about it so they're they're really just kind of coming up with different strategies to deal with this some of them are hardcore lunatics who want to just jail everybody that criticize them and some of them are more gain theorists who want to kind of slowly work into this just like allow us some freedom but just deny us of voice on the media which is a guy like Israel Avant here in Canada just just gonna bring that up good you mentioned that exactly because of you know there is this the rise of a kind of a kosher anti-political correctness that's occurring and I think Canada is actually spearheading that in two certain examples you have other sources in America like the rebel you have what's the other one called there there are a couple like this basically and it's interesting because they're kind of I mean I'm not saying that they're doing it effectively well yeah they're not they're not effectively like you know kind of controlling the whole debate obviously but but it's like they're trying to attach themselves to that idea that they see somehow the rise in discontent they see the rise in in anti-immigration rhetoric and these kinds of things and they're trying to attach itself upon that with these you know the truth labels I mean it's kind of pathetic it's like they're coming along with this now this was down like freaking 10 years ago online you know that's when the truth movement started you know what I mean more than that even so anyway it's fun it's fun to see them trying yeah that that's a huge phenomenon as relevant who runs the rebel that is the epitome of kosher controlled opposition he wants to steer everything into the direction of just blaming Muslims and islam for everything he's a Zionist Jewish neocon he admitted that the people who created the hate speech laws here in Canada were the organized Jewish groups Muslims didn't do that it was it was Jewish organizations that it spearheaded the hate speech laws it goes after all these people for speaking out that ruined the life of her in zundle a peaceful guy that was just publishing pamphlets questioning some aspects of the second world war they financially ruined him they harassed him they firebombed his house they had him arrested and jailed without charge and then they shipped him to Germany where you went to jail for five years for a thought crime these people are psychopathic and and they're really trying to control this whole dissent towards anti-feminism and and this whole alt-right they want to hijack that like they do with everything and steer it into a direction favorable to them and that's exactly what they're doing on every end of this well exactly in the wine about free speech or that they somehow are being suppressed even though they're a very safe territory and it's as many as other you know they basically just want to move the goalpost just enough of you know public discourse basically to include them but anyone that's you know in their opinion to you know a little bit too extreme for them or whatever they're ready to sell them out right away so it's a very disingenuous movement and i think people are gonna see through that too right a little van is a perfect example this guy claims it's some free speech martyb a really he's just trying to take the thunder away from people like Paul from well interviewed people like uh uh Douglass Christie and others who who were who were very anti-zionist and Levan is trying to hijack that steered into his zio con jewish supremacy camp which ignores all those issues puts it on a boogie man that they basically advocate for you to to dislike because it benefits them and and this is going this is spreading because you see out what's like bright mart and info wars they're all pushing this this this kosher phony uh backlash against political correctness and uh feminism and all these new left concepts and the extremists in in the in the LGBT movement but what what are they doing they're saying oh uh we can't uh they're trying to portray it as if like muslims control the west isn't absurd fantasy right they're acting like obama is a secret muslim right that that they are suppressing free speech it's it's muslim not Jews it's it's it's muslims not Zion this is absurd right this is a fantasy ruck obama was bankrolled from the beginning by Zionist right and 80% of his foreign policies on side with the ododian own plan he didn't create the policy to support ISIS that was George W Bush started that in 2007 he's just continued he's just a front man the face right but they're they're they're what they're doing is they're putting all the blame on obama now and and acting like he's the mastermind of all this he's not a mastermind he's a puppet he's a he's a fool but they've just put up there to be the face of it's just like George W Bush these are long term plans that had been in place long before obama came but it's all being geared towards this kosher phony muslim bashing uh and and it of course plays into that the neo conservative narratives so that's what we're seeing a hijacking of all descent in the in North America and in Europe they put their people at the helm of it so that they can lead it so that they can uh control it and so that they can reject any voices that are genuine they do have a very good analysis of what's going on that do really name the string flows behind all of this and they just don't give us a voice right that's what Jones in fact Jones exposed himself by having David Duke on a show who ripped them to shreds yeah exposed them as a fraud and now he's having to recover by deleting that interview and pretending that it never happened so yeah that was funny I was surprised he did that you know or that they invited him I guess they kind of walked into that and then they couldn't pull out of it because it's been seen as too weak or something but yeah it's um it's it's it's funny it's it's incredibly funny but it's I think people are smart enough to see it and and um I think people might be going along and and see some of the things along the way or or or or what I'm saying parts of what they're talking about as being you know legitimate but then it's incredibly important that people are there like you to you expand on that and and show the true you know as he said those pulling the strings behind the scenes right because that's really where it's at it's really what the show has been about today here really trying to get to the point of you know we have we have tremendous amounts of symptoms in in the west and it's important that we actually focus on the root causes of it even if it's to some people beneficial for a short period of time you know to to recognize those symptoms as a way to kind of open themselves up to to to the valid to to the aspect that it's valid a valid point to criticize it right and then to take it a step further but uh Brenna I think we're gonna we're gonna start wrapping up here in a little bit I definitely want to give you opportunity again to mention your websites and the the book you have upcoming it's uh I know you're working on that now to release it but you have do you have more things in the in the works there are more things planned ahead or what's up next for you well other than this book I really don't have anything planned I'm always writing and researching I'm trying to find obviously new areas to explore because we sometimes we become like a more of a broken record than anything when we just kind of repeat the same things over and over again and that's what uh my uh collie d'achro blakene has been doing he's been focused on uh some of the aspects of japanese history and he's delving into that so it is it is good I think for people to sometimes take a break from things and not be too too involved or obsessed because you know uh you've done a ton of work I've I've done a lot of writing and research over the past few years I've been very outspoken about this stuff and there's really enough benefit to honest personally to do these things we're just doing this because it's the right thing to do we don't get any money from this right barely any maybe I don't make very much one eight all on books so this is uh these are these are these are issues that affect the world and we're speaking out about it because we want to see a better world and and that's why we do is there's no selfish motives involved in any of this so uh for me I'm probably going to take a bit of a break after I release this uh the second edition of this book the the editions I made there's about 60 pages of new material the book's only 140 pages before that so it's over 200 pages now so for people who actually bought it already I think that they can just go to go to the amazon page and get get the Kindle edition which will be like six bucks or whatever to get the the new content and and for people who haven't read it this is perfect just wait for the the second edition it will be out probably next week I have everything set up I'm just waiting for them to to approve it and uh you can get that for about 1499 I believe so that'll be up soon and and as far as the future who knows I'm still going to definitely run non-alien media and and and post my commentaries there updates when when I feel it's necessary but uh maybe take a bit of a vacation you know right well I definitely make sure that you do make some money on this and and expanding your effort and that that's what we're trying