JIM FETZER "Truth vs New$,Inc" (8-12-19) HOUR 2 Epstein Dead?

Video Transcript:

Back folks to truth versus news for August 12th. And we got the second half of Jim Petter and Scott Barrett. And this has been something else about what's really happening in this wild world we're having here in this high-igose, both O4JM. Thanks, Don. Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer is rejecting GLP red flag law efforts. We're not going to settle for half measures. So Republicans can feel better. Actually, I feel better that he's taking this stand. It's hypocrisy. It's hypocritical, but it's the right thing to do. Because red flag laws are a very bad idea. It's a form of harassment and intimidation of apprehending property without due process. Republican senators have shown openness to potential legislation that would allow authorities to prevent individuals from purchasing a gun. Or confiscate a gun they all rate own. If a family member reports them as potentially dangerous and files record order, the notion that passing a tempered version of the extreme risk protection order alone is even close to getting the job done in addressing gun violence in the US is wrong. And would be an ineffective call about Schumer said, we Democrats are not going to settle for half measures. So Republicans can feel better and try to push the issue of gun violence off to the side. Republican senators, including Lindsey Glam and Marco Rubio, have gotten on board with revived type laws. And even President Trump has called for them in a speech about the massacres in Dayton and El Paso. It would just provide grant incentives for states to implement laws of their own, which run the risk of doing more harm than good in the long run of states decide to take up weaker law Schumer said. Graham believes his proposal would be effective in reducing instances of mass murder and said the president agreed. I spoke with him, resin this morning about this proposal. He seemed very supportive, Graham said Monday. Many of these shootings involve individuals who showed signs of violent behavior that are either ignored or not followed up. State red flag laws will provide the tools for law enforcement to do something about many of these situations before it's too late. Some conservatives are wary of red flag laws that appeared under my due process by creating the potential that illegal gun owner could have his property confiscated for weeks before he's allowed to defend himself in court. And they are completely right. Meanwhile, the NRA comes out swinging against attacks, Trump gun proposals. NRA responded forcefully Thursday to attacks on the group following recent mass shootings to gun measures proposed by President Trump. The mammoth gun right organization with your most five million members issued an 18-part statement by Tweed to address recent events and proposed legislation following back-to-back shootings over the weekend in El Paso and Dayton. May I say, back-to-back stage shootings. As a group that's advocated for a second amendment, freedoms for almost 150 years, we stand for only the safe and lawful use of firearms. Trump who enjoys NRA support reportedly consulted with NRA president Wayne Law Piair just after the shootings according to the Hill. It's our longstanding policy not to comment about meetings a group said for further details. Trump address a nation Monday where it called for gun reform, including early warning gun confiscation of mental health considerations of block access to firearms. The NRA initially released remark supporting Trump, but used the longer statement Thursday to clarify issues they have with his proposals. While the NRA said they support getting treatment for those adjudicated as a danger to themselves or others, the statement went a step further. But there needs to be real evidence of danger. We cannot sacrifice anyone's constitutional rights without due process. With regard to universal background checks, which refer to the gap created by the lack of background checks for private gun sales, the NRA drew another distinction from Trump. It's not enough anymore to simply say we need more background checks. They said considering most suspects in El Paso and Dayton passed them, that is rhetoric for billionaire activists and campaign rallies, not a call for constructive progress. Trump said Wednesday he was all in favor of them in remarks to reporters before he left to have visited officials and victims in El Paso and Dayton last week. Scott. Well, Trump speaking off the cuff and knee jerk reactions do not serve him well. And these people, including his daughter who runs in screaming daddy, daddy, more children have been killed without even looking or considering the false flag potentialities of this without looking at the evidence of this, puts Trump in a very bad position. Either he's a traitor to the American people in the constitution by participating in a lie or he's being lied to. Those are the only two positions he can be on. He's either a liar on the side of liars or he's being lied to and doesn't know any better and he's being clouded in his mind and not able to react. And then of course he goes into political survival mode and says I have to say something and that's precisely what they try and do is move him little by little by little so that when he's gone the ultimate objective, of course, is the complete eradication of all firearms under a police state. And Stephen Mollonou had said that in a very good way saying if you're about gun control, you're really not because you're in favor of the police, the police state, the intelligence services, the bureaucrats, the judges, the lawyers, having guns and everybody else not. Well, they had that in the Soviet Union. They had that in the Gestapo. They had that in the various totalitarian... They were not in China today. China today, yeah. And look at happens to the poor people in China. They get whisked off and have their organs cut out and they get put in slave labor, make them slavery, make them Nike shoes and electronic chips for the American consumer and Biden and all these other people are looking the other way. So the second amendment and the right to keep in bear arms is what separates us from absolute anarchy and sanity and savouring savagery. And it is the anarchists and the savages and the insane, globalist, godless atheist types who are trying to push us into this being corralled in control. And the only way they can do it is by removing the second amendment, guaranteeing everybody can be labeled a domestic terrorist and enabling judges to write red flag reports that instantly force you to turn in your weapon or weapons whenever they may be. They could expand this into bow and arrows and the crossbows and the BB guns and the slingshots and the knives, turn in your weapons or go to camp number four. That's where they're pushing this. And I think they don't realize the largest army on the earth are the American people. And they would overthrow and destroy any law enforcement, practitioner, judge or attorney who tried to advance that. This is very dangerous and it's similar to the restraining order issue. If a judge orders a restraining order, simply because of a complaint of someone that person's guns are automatically, mandatoryly turned in until he hearing. And this is what red flag laws will lead to. The instant immediate annihilation of the second amendment using the stroke of a pen of a judge, Jim. Well, sir, Don, now you really think that the American government that we have in here, whenever do that, oh, come on now. Not our government. Go ahead. Thanks, Don. Meanwhile, and this is stunning, Elizabeth Warren plans to use a tax code to deprive law-abiding citizens of their second amendment, riots. Her proposals include taxes on guns and ammo, federal gun licensing program raising age for gun purchases nationally to 21. Where do these lunatics come from? They don't understand anything about the second amendment. They don't understand anything about weapons. They don't understand anything about the necessity for weapons to defend yourselves. The number of defensive gun uses each year is controversial, but a study ordered by the CDC conducted by the National Academies Institute of Medicine and National Research Council reported. Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence. The Democrats have to understand this message. Almost all national survey estimates indicate defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals. With estimates of annual use ranging from a half a million to more than three million in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms based on a study in 2008. Another estimate is a million 29,615 defensive gun uses per year for self protection or for the protection of property and homework or elsewhere yielding an estimate of 162,000 cases per year where someone almost certainly would have killed. Been killed. Had they not used the gun for protection round that, around 200,000 Americans every year. That's with a prevailing loss. And we know from studies done worldwide that the greater the gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate in the countries with the highest gun ownership, Finland and Switzerland, they have the lowest rate of crime. Beto O'Rourke said, if guns made as safe, we'd be the safest country in the world. Well, we are. Actually, if he looked at the statistics, if he looked at the facts of the matter, if he weren't just engaging propaganda, the US and Canada have among the highest gun ownership in the world and also the lowest homicide rate. South American countries like Brazil, low gun ownership, high homicide rate. How can that happen? The Democrats would have you believe, people only kill people with guns. They use knives, they use machetes, they use swords. Look at Africa. Low gun ownership, high homicide rate, Russia. Low gun ownership, high homicide rate. It's embarrassingly bad. Scott, where you were just citing Stefan Moanu, who made it very clear. If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it's not that you are anti-gun. You'll need the police guns to take away other people's guns. So you're very pro-gun. You just believe that only the government, which is, of course, so reliable, so on, so moral, so virtuous, should be allowed to have guns. There's no such thing as gun control. There's only centralized gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions. If you believe in tyranny, if you believe in democracy, you want the people to be armed and defend themselves as Dave Hodges has reported during the 20th century. There are 19 demonstrators, slaughters of whole societies, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation. That's how it's done. Don't let America become number 20. Meanwhile, of all the insanity, NBC Universal, we're not canceling release of a film where liberals, the liberal elite, hut Trump supporters for sport. Believe it or not, that's what Hollywood has put out a film where the liberal elites, Trump supporters for sport. Now here's a fascinating report by Tucker Carter, every American should watch because Tucker's got it exactly right. Can you be a lot of the Tucker Carlson tonight? What's the point at which rhetoric forces action into words become incitement? At what point do political attacks become so reckless and unhinged that you can no longer heal the divide they create with politics and force people towards something darker? Well, talk to you now exactly when that point is but the left is getting very close to it. You can give you many examples of this will begin with this exchange from last night on MSNBC. This is frequent guest Malcolm Nance accusing the President of the United States of sending secret messages to neo-Nazis. These people feel that they are the foot soldiers and executors of what the disenfranchisement that the white race is feeling and Donald Trump is giving them subliminal orders in their head. Subliminal, subliminal orders. Whatever his faults, you can be certain that Donald Trump is not doing that. Trump is the least subliminal politician in American history. He has no subtext. That's part of the problem, of course, he's thinking it, he's saying it. The claim is ludicrous, but at MSNBC, it wasn't even the weirdest thing on or on their area yesterday. That distinction goes to Frank Figluzzi. He's a former FBI official term talking head conspiracy nut. He used numerology to explain the president's coded messages. Watch this and keep in mind it is entirely real. We've not edited a single word. It's a little things and language and messaging that matters. The president said that we will fly our flags at half-mast until August 8th. That's eight. Eight. Now I'm not going to imply that he did this deliberately, but I am using it as an example of the ignorance of the adversary that's being demonstrated by the White House. The numbers eight are very significant in neo-Nazi and white supremacy movement. Why? Because the letter H is the eighth letter of the alphabet. And to them, the numbers eight together stand for higher Hitler. That that eight is a racist number. That's what they're telling you on MSNBC. In other words, things are getting dangerously crazy on the left. How crazy? Well, on Monday former Jen Bush spokeswoman Nicole Wallace explained that President Trump is planning a genocide of Hispanic Americans. Watch this. You ran for it again. To the invasion, the warning people of the Caribbean and words like, infestation. What do you do with an infestation? With an infestation being natural, the conclusion is to attempt extermination. President Obama, I used the power of the president. I tried to pass comprehensive immigration reform to Latino community. Latino leaders at the table. You know, I have a president. You said talking about exterminating. Right, Latinos. Exterminating Latinos. Given the Donald Trump as a factual matter to the higher percentage of the Hispanic vote, then Mitt Romney did turns out that not all Latinos believe in open borders. A lot of them don't. Some of them agree with Donald Trump on immigration. And yet the left is now telling you and demanding that you believe that anyone who supports Donald Trump is a white supremacist and must be destroyed. Now, they're telling you that for political reasons. This is election season, obviously, and they want more political power. But there are other reasons too that they're saying this. Everyone know I rich people seem the most hysterical on the subject. Ever noticed that it's the highest paid people on television who are the most determined to convince you that white supremacy is America's biggest problem? Why is that? Simple. Every minute you're angry about race is a minute you're not thinking about class, which of course is the real divide in this country. Working class people of all colors have a lot more in common, infinitely more in common with each other than they do with some overpaid MSNBC anchor. And if you were allowed to think about that for long enough, you might start to get unauthorized ideas about economics. And that would be disruptive to a very lucrative status quo. So they whip you into a frenzy of racial fear so that it never enters your mind. It's a diversion. Everyone else hates each other. They get to keep their money pretty tricky. Unfortunately, it's also destroying the country. This is the path, the civil war, obviously. So we want to take a second to pass on a sincere message to official Washington and particularly to our colleagues on the other people news channels. And it's this, please, for the sake of the nation, calm down. Yes, America has problems. Yes, racism is one of America's problems. But so is it fading middle class? So is a terrifying drug epidemic that's killed hundreds of thousands of Americans. So as a national debt is growing by a trillion dollars a year. These are huge problems. And people know that. People know their country is in decline. And it's making them turn to new political leaders. Donald Trump was one of those new leaders, who is with Warren and Alexandria Cazio Cortez, or a couple of others. This is a time of frustration. And it's a time of change. It's a hard time for America. But this country is not on the brink of genocide. It's not even close to that. This is not a white supremacist country plotting the slaughter of its own people. It's a kind country full of decent people of all races, who like all people everywhere make bad decisions from time to time. But they mean well, they generally try their best. So going forward, give them the benefit of the doubt, even when you disagree with them, maybe especially when you disagree with them. These are your fellow Americans. Cut them a break. They deserve it. And remember, the alternative is disaster. Yeah, Parker is so brilliant. He's so wonderful, Scott, your comments. Well, he's one of the few thinking guys in the media. We met with him in San Francisco and gave him a copy of Shell Game. And he knows he knows where to fire the phasers. And I think a lot of a lot of this is going to be coming. I like his analysis, of course. And he's been saying the same thing. We've been saying, Jim, we're not just on the precipice of the Civil War. We're in a civil war. We're in a civil war because people like you and me and Don and Michael J and many others who are into listening to, you know, these transmissions in the media, like radio operators in a World War II bunker. We're dialed in and listening and analyzed and strategically mapping out what's happening, who's doing it, where's it going. And we see people like Nicole Wallace and these liberal leftist communist types doing distraction operations. And doing exactly what Tucker could said he's doing it very well. Racism. And I mean, Nicole Wallace has about as much in common with lower blue collar worker types as, you know, the Pope does with, you know, some aborigini in the world. And she's in an, and she, these people are, of course, are going to run over the cliff and they're going to just completely lose all credibility as they already have because lower minority workers, blue collar workers. They may be simple, but they're very simple in their understanding of the truth. And they are very simple and intuitive when it comes to discerning lies and liars. And they see Wallace and they see Biden and they see all these people that are trying to propagate that. And in a sense, they're disgusted and they push them back. And that's where Wallace and these other idiots are going to lose once again, because they're not going to understand that they have absolutely no stick them whatsoever in the, in the blue collar minority ranks. And they're going to vote for Donald Trump, most likely if he doesn't get us into a war, which I think is the biggest threat to his presidency. Even a small war, he could lose everything. And the second amendment, wishy-washy-ness could also destroy Trump, because you know, Jim, there is a massive population in this country that will look at, that are looking at Trump very scrutinizingly right now. And saying, if you alter one line on anything that allows me to keep in bearer arms, one line, one letter in favor of leftism, liberalism, communism. If you move that needle one degree to the left, I'm pulling my vote and walking away from you, Trump. And that could lose him the presidency, because he could lose it by a very small fraction. That's how passionately gun owners are about this, because it's not just about guns. It's about, if you pull your finger out of the dike and allow our guns to be washed away with a torrent of fear of paranoia and legalistic tyranny, then our children are enslaved, then our daughters are taken away. Then we really are transformed into subhumans. And I'd rather die fighting, as Terrell Nesten said, that allow that to happen. That's how close people are. That's why Trump does some very stupid things when he says, well, just take the guns away and settle it later. That's going to get him either killed or removed from the presidency in peach or he's going to lose to tell some gathered. If he says things like that, because it has the effect of a nuclear toxicity on the gun owners of America, Jim. Your right, Scott, he said, take the guns and worry about due process later in the presence of Diane finestein a couple of years ago was insane. Don, I'm sure you want to comment. He showed the photo of you and Michael J with Tucker several times here, Scott. That was wonderful to see. Don. Yeah, we have a little to see Scott with Tucker and wonderful to hear from Scott on his on his first hand information. So it's something here that I will say was truth. The consumers are being drowned out by the corporation. It's just overwhelming. So we've got a lot of what you do folks and sharing this video and these are shows and Bobby the best thing you can do. New DNC rules make way for more dams in the October debate. I think in fact it's because of Tulsi Gabbard that they seem to be giving more time, more opportunity. The DNC sent a memo to campaigns extending the date for candidates to a mass 130,000 unique donors and hit 2% in four national polls ahead of the October debate. The same requirements were also in place for the September debate giving candidates more time to qualify the qualification for period for both debates started on June 28. June and July's debates have more lenient requirements to give most candidates the opportunity to be heard before a large TV audience. The third September 12 has significantly stricter qualifications with a deadline of August 28th. We're getting close former HUD secretary Julian Castro represent Tulsi Gabbard and interpreter Andrew Yang said they met the donor requirement. But as of July only eight candidates had met both Joe Biden, Corey Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, beta or art Amy Covish, our Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren. Meanwhile Tulsi is rising in the polls and therefore they're attempting to smear her as some kind of neo Nazi. I mean, this is embarrassing leave bad. Some of America's most prominent white nationalists are taking credit for improved fortune. The neo Nazi website, Naley Stormer, to credit in April for Gabbard reaching the 65,000 donor threshold to qualify for the debate. June's insider reported obviously they're opposed to Tulsi because she's a non interventionist and she doesn't hasn't brought straight in herself for Israel. The website they supported the anti war candidate to make the Jews go nuts. Meanwhile, this isn't the first time she's attracted such support officially if it isn't simply a duplicitous operation to undermine her credibility. White nationalist leader David Duke and Richard Spencer have made favorable statements about her. As have Scott met in Jim Fatser, white nationalist generally cipher isolationist views, really non interventionist or 2017 meeting with Syrian dictator, except he's not a dictator. He's the democratically elected president of Syria, which talks to yourself needs to emphasize and a criticism of broke Obama and other Democrats for not using the phrase radical Islamic terrorism. Tulsi Gabbard for president finally a candidate who actually put America first rather than Israel first, new tweeted in February. Gabbard who's a Samoan American rejected his support in a statement of the hill. I have strongly announced David Duke's hateful views in his so-called support multiple times in the past and rejected. Gabbard support did not respond to multiple requests for comment from Jewish insider of what they knew about the daily stormers donation efforts, whether they plan to return him. Gabbard is not the only candidate to have to distance themselves from white national supporters. Many also praise business man Andrew Yang due to his universal basic income proposal in opposition to circumcision and several prominent white nationalists at back resident Trump, no others have said his anti immigration policies haven't gone far enough. Before we're again another Jewish journal reported last year at that Trump and the Republican National Committee had accepted hundreds of dollars in donations from white nationalists figures like Aryan nation leader more. Let's go at but it refused the return the money Scott. Yeah, we're witnessing and they tell see Gabbard rising in popularity because of the moderation and the smooth calm attractive demeanor and presentation and cutting penetrating power and analysis that comes from being in the military experiencing the horrors of military intervention and combat and seeing also the disgusting bureaucracy and the idiocy in the military. I mean the best people are special operations. I work with them and they were also they were always into the fight to win it and to go home and it's it's always a tragedy because the special forces guys and I was with the siop guys, civil affairs. We were always we were always stopped or confounded by these idiot West Point bureaucrat types who were not special operations people and they were career military and that's the problem because the career military makes war a career development. That's why good people get the hell out of the military that's where they're second by and you're left with this lukewarm puddle of green goo bureaucracy that you know above the rank of major you have some of the dippiest stupidest weakest cowardly idiots in the military ever. I think Chelsea Gabbard saw a lot of that and that's what energizes her refusal to open up the world into this constant war because not only is it a waste it's destroying the heart of America it's destroying our kids and it's positioning us for an existential defeat it's positioning America despite our hubris and our claims of technological advancement. We are positioning ourselves for a confrontation with Russia, China, Iran, Syria, Turkey and Saudi Arabia and Israel Saudi Arabia is going to run like a dog with its tail between its legs and Israel is not going to do anything until America is defeated and then they're going to sue for peace they're going to sue for some sort of compromise. Israel will never ever stand with the United States they are standing for themselves and the American people fueled by this Christian Zionism delusion that somehow the apocalyptic you know Christian Zionist time table time calendar is supposed to fuel our foreign policy decisions and investments these lunatics are getting us into this you know this stupidity and this problem so Chelsea Gabbard is rising because I think she is representing the best in the American mind and Dick black knows that too senator Dick black and others have said Chelsea Gabbard represents really the best chance for peace Ron Paul has said that I like Trump to represent that I like Trump to come in and say this is this is where we're going but sadly he seems to be under the control of Bolton and Sengal Mandelker and Mewt Schinn and all of these people that are from the United States. All of these people that are pushing us into economic war diplomatic war that will only inevitably lead to a military war Jim. Yeah I want to say real quick thing that Chelsea I think has got more balls than all the democratic guy men candidates out there and I think that Island good to slogan for Chelsea it should be her slogan stop war hug more I'll go for that stop for hug more. Meanwhile a US verdict allowing the seizure of an Iran link manhand the skyscraper has been overturned this is a positive development New York Reuters a jury verdict allowing the US government to seize a midtown Manhattan office tower that it said was effectively controlled by Iran was thrown out on Friday by a federal appeal sport which cited several errors by the trial judge. The three to O decision by the second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan is a defeat for the Department of Justice which went the trial hoping to sell the 36 story building at 650. Fifth Avenue perhaps for close to a billion dollars 829,026 million pounds and distribute proceeds to victims of bombings and other attacks linked to Iran they should have falsely linked to Iran. The jurors had found in June 2017 that the nonprofit al-Ali Foundation which had a 60% stake in the partnership that owned the building violated US sanctions imposed against Iran in 1995 because it knew that the 40% owner asset corporation was a front for an Iranian state owned lender bank Mellie but in Friday's decision circuit judge Richard Wesley faulty trial judge Catherine for us. It was now in private practice for a troubling pattern of errors on relatively straightforward issues. Meanwhile another New York judge says university must allow students to form a pro-Palestinian group. Fordham university's decision to reject students for justice in Palestine was armature and compression for judge has ruled in another positive decision. A New York judge is ordered a private university to recognize a students for justice in Palestine SJP club on its cameras. A decision that was welcomed by students in right groups as a boost for Palestinian advocacy in the United States in a decision released on Tuesday. Justice Nancy Bannon said Fordham university's decision to reject an application from students to start an SJP branch at the New York City school was arbitrary and compression. Fordham student government approved the creation of an SJP branch at the University of November 2016 but the deeth of students keep Eldridge rejected it a month later. At the time Eldridge site concern about SJP support for the boycott divestment and sanctions movement which seeks the pressure Israel to end its human rights abuses against Palestinians. Ethelridge also criticized a group for advocating political goals of a specific group and against a specific country. How absurd is that on Monday justice man and dismiss the reasoning writing in her decision that the university denied the students application because J SJP specifically advocates against Israeli government policy to the extent that Dean Eldridge claims authority to reject any club that criticized it a particular country that same rule could be applied to students protesting or criticizing China's occupation and annexation of Tibet. Russian occupation of Crimea or a Rex one time occupation of Kuwait she wrote. Meanwhile the FBI is harassing US citizens for attending an Iran linked event. The US federal Bureau of investigation is going after American citizens who have already attended or planned to attend the new horizon conference. An annual form held by Iranian media experts to discuss major global issues. I have participated in the past in 2014 Scott was there justice past year. Michael Mollof of a junior base former Pentagon official and a frequent press TV panelists found FBI agents knocking at his door at 6 30 a.m. One day back in May in article by sander hicks on medium dot com revealed this week Maloof who had traveled to mash ad in northern Iran to attend last years. New horizons conference is one of the many guests invited to the next iteration of the event which is to be held in the Lebanese capital bay route in September. However, the agents warned him of dire consequences. The consequences should he decide to accept the invitation in July. The FBI sent agents to the Florida home of Scott record a former translator with the US Air Force and the US national security agency who once attended the new horizon in Iran. He too was threatened by the bureau to either skip the conference or face arrest according to hicks. The FBI has also approached former State Department of the diplomat J Michael springman asking him over the phone to attend a meeting and answer a few questions about the new horizon. But he turned down the request. No, thank you. He said before hanging up the phone. Pick set in his article. Connects the three pundits as they're naked credits of the Mavisrael and its policies as well as the special relationship the regime enjoys with Washington through various outlets, including press TV where I myself have been featured and interviewed over 100 times. The FBI's intimidation technique set a new low with America's approach to his relationship with Tel Aviv where it has constantly backed the regime despite its many atrocities against the people of Palestine Lebanon and more recently Syria. And we've just had a wonderful interview of Scott Bennett with marshy has seen me on press TV about this very precise, warm up harassment Scott, I'm eager to get your latest reflections on this at length. Well, of course I was delighted that marshy has she me called me I had a good conversation with her in that interview. The reason that they're panicking Jim let me break it down into the real meat of the issue. The reason they're panicking is because of the 9-11 revelations that were made at the new horizons conference and the Iranian officials who were debriefing everyone about the non-existent non-existent non- participation of Iran in the 9-11 attacks that reverberated with a major nuclear sort of impact into the ideas and the flow of what does this mean how is this going to reverberate. So it is the 9-11 connection and the evaporation of the 9-11 connection in the case that the Iranians were bringing although they didn't move as fast as they should they weren't you know they kind of wrote it off because they you know they totally distrust everything that is in the United States of America the courts and everything else. But it was the Americans that came over there that were exposed to this material that we're talking about this material that we're building camaraderie and a sense of we need the truth that all costs about this 9-11 issue that's what sent sigal mandelker and you can and the Zionist into panic mode and they've been threatening everybody who went there now the one thing. Scott is Scott record has never been to the new horizon conference Sanders got this wrong here's what happened Jim Scott record who I knew who was an Air Force intelligence guy great guy very smart very in the same ideas that we have he I recommended that he be invited to new horizon I contacted the people that you know press TV and I said hey here's a great guy. Here's a great guy that you would like I also mentioned Jim and all sorts of other people not know because they were asking who would be good to bring over who be a good guest and I said this guy is really smart he's really good Scott record and I knew him from Florida he's a he's a very brilliant guy so they outreach to him he had never been there before Jim so they invite him and he gets a visit by the FBI how and why because they were listening to me they were observing. They were watching my Facebook page so Scott Bennett sadly I haven't been visited by the FBI they haven't called me they haven't visited anything to me but they visit the guy that I recommend although he's never been over to Iran and of course he said well I've never been there and they're not a threat and the Zionist sigal mandelker and these other people in the treasury are actually doing the bidding of Israel you're an FBI agent you swore note to this constitution you should know that of course the FBI guys are saying well we don't know we we're just doing our orders we're just told well they've done this to Scott record again who I invited why recommended not that he's ever been there so they're obviously listening and they also do this to Mike Maloof they showed up at Mike's house Mike was a Pentagon official he was an Afghanistan he was very critical of Bolton he knew Bolton they've done it to Phil Garaldi a C.I. analyst who is a prolific writer they did it to J Michael springman who was a state department passport guy who wrote visas for al Qaeda that talked about visas the US government were given to al Qaeda operatives to bring over to the United States and train they fired Michael springman from the state department for that there were other whistleblowers other people from the intelligence the military communities not doing anything un-American but doing everything that represents the best of what America is building bridges building conversations building relationships doing more for this country than anybody else in 40 years is what we did and for these idiots to start abusing our constitutional rights telling us we can't go over and exercise our freedom of speech or exercising our freedom of religion by testifying to the great things that God has done in our lives and the truth that he's given us this government stopping this is a total violation of title 20 it's a while doing something under the color of law it's totally unconstitutional they're threatening people with 20 years in jail and millions of dollars of fines if they go over to Bay Root and just talk if they go over to Bay Root and go on some sojourn if they go in and just have any conversation that is where America is losing its soul and becoming a police state and if they're doing it without giving Trump all of the info he needs to fire these people because his only hope is through back channel conferences and such like New Horizons it was the religious leader of Iran that granted us our visas it was not Zareeth it was not President Rahani it was the Khomeini the religious leader that granted us our visas the first time in the history of Iran since 79 and before that American military CIA State Department guys were invited as academics to talk so Trump is on the wrong side of the world in the history here he's better realize these people are abusing and using him and setting him up and it's not going to be taken these people who were denied this they're going to court they're going to be filing legal action to expose the Gaul Mandelker and this whole operation and these sanctions are based on completely fraudulent material they're basing it on that Israeli Zionist woman who has claimed to have been you know supposedly someone who went back there in 2015 and and all of that smells like a set up so all of this is is being challenged and exposed but it's it's not good optics it's not good for the president and it shows that these people are undermining him or he's he's fully on board and participating in the violation of American citizens by stopping them from going over and talking Jim Don yeah real real good thing this denial of your passport and set to go over there that's beyond their scope of authority and it's denying your rights and I have paperwork on that so you can have something at the door for a person who was at somebody who was at your door put them on notice that they're violating the law they're the criminal and you have rights against them and these paperwork dresses that so I'll take the picture you mean absolutely do go for it we have we have remedy of course thanks thanks Don good works guys meanwhile the New York Times caves to pressure from the left this is why no one trusts the mainstream media anymore look at this it's hard to keep up with a fast news cycle it's even harder when major publications continuously change their own stories based on what Democrats say usually if a media out has to fix a story is because they prematurely pounce when it turned out to be false you've seen this with Roger gate jossie small at the coming of kids the name of you sometimes news agencies have to amend things because they accidentally got something right huh stay with that because this is the issue look here the New York Times in relation to the shootings Trump urges unity versus racism was the headline but under pressure from the left they revised it to assailing hate but not guns in other words they want to promote the Democrats misconceived anti-gun agenda and not give Trump any credit for seeking to bring national unity meanwhile president Trump is preparing an executive order that'll crack down hard on social media censorship a good thing it appears that president Trump is getting ready to bring down the hammer on the social media giants according to politico the Trump administration is grafting an executive order that will tackle silicon valleys anti conservative bias and it's very much in front self-interest to do this social media played a key role in helping him win in 2016 but since then we've seen an unrest in a wave of censorship on social media platforms most of the censorship has been directed at conservative voices and conspiracy research if Trump doesn't do something it's hard to see how a win in 2020 indeed we've had Google acknowledge that it played a major role in the midterms by shifting as much as 76 million votes in favor of the Democrats through its algorithms and other manipulation of messages and communications on the internet ultimately it would take an act of Congress to do what needs to be done but Trump should be applauded for trying to do what he can on his own a political was able to speak to three separate sources familiar with the drafting of the new executive order and came to the conclusion that the administration is very serious about wielding the federal government's power against silicon valley it's not clear if such an executive order would hold up in court undoubtedly there'll be legal challenges right away of course those challenges will take a long time to play out because we know how quickly the legal system moves but for the short term what matters is what effect this will have on the behavior of the big social media companies goals should be to induce them to do the right thing uh since these big companies that contract with the federal government Trump ought to prohibit federal contractors from discriminating against customers based on their political views a similar approach has been attempted before but meanwhile look at moon rock books we've now had five more of our books banned clearly for political purposes promoting the fake gun control agenda they don't want books that blow it out of the water so they banned political theater in Charlottesville they banned the parklin puzzle they banned from Orlando to Dallas all of which expose it they've also banned nobody died in Boston because that's still on the political agenda in our moon book almost certainly because it contains an ex-mose about world war two and the holocaust has the dimensions of a mass illusion stunning stop Scott yes it's it's a striking opportunity of course to file legal action and lawsuit and complaints and everything under the sun that their constitution gives us the right to do against these media entities against CNN or our Facebook YouTube Twitter these these groups that are actively trying to shut down conservative voices or aiding and abetting crimes and we we return to the New Zealand shooting where we very clearly demonstrated that that shooting was not consistent with the scientific laws of bullets and forensics and impacts on bodies and the ways that human bodies react to being shot as well as the ways that bullets would have impacted the walls and the blood spatter all of that was absent and all of that absence of material scientific evidence shows that it was a fake shooting with blanks and other things happened that were not real and they shut down our page and discussions because of that and that makes the parties that shut down that talk aiding and abetting crimes and this Walmart shooting right they may have done the same thing there they began used a manifesto idea saying there's some manifesto that somebody wrote a 19 year old kid can hardly write never mind even understand what a manifesto is you know the the the idiocy behind all of this is striking but they're catching themselves in their own traps and I think the alternative media is exposing it and it adds when we see things like Epstein and this other false flag or these false things let's also remember Julian Assange it's always remember to come back to Julian Assange is the best Pulitzer Prize winning whistleblower and exposure of truth that this country's ever had it is on Trump's hands and blood is on Trump's hands if Julian Assange is actually in jail being medicated and tortured and lobotomized by the British that is a national security state's evidence witness that Trump should go over there and personally fly over give him a room of the basement of the White House and bars if he needs to but Julian Assange possesses the truth of the greatest crimes that ever occurred in this country and I saw one of them I saw wiki leaks cables that Brad Berkin fell have that disclosed the Hillary Clinton Swiss Bank terrorist financing connection and that is the greatest threat because that failure to expose and shut down the terrorist financing and the prosecution that was done by Hillary Clinton it was done by Eric Holger it was done by Loretta Lynch it was done by Tim Geithner it was done by Renee Alexander Acosta it was done by John Brennan CIA and Julian Assange has all of that Brad Berkin felt has all of that Edward Snowden has all of that Scott Bennett has all of that and the Congress need to hear it in the White House needs to hear it otherwise we are not a country we are a plantation of slaves and idiots so we better be prepared to overthrow that Jim Don oh that's amazing your books are just tremendous Jim we want to get those books out because this is real exclusive folks and they're being lied to all the time by the media and we can't we can't have that so and these are just a treasure trove of books they're all banned they're not going to be able to get these anywhere else than you wouldn't want to watch books the suppression the suppression is simply stunning yeah meanwhile the White House report who did a Reagan attorney says this man did it was this fellow wise man out of all the predictions about the outcome of the Mueller the one thing that probably surprised all of us was Mueller turned out to be a senile opa throughout the questioning Mueller seemed confused you knew virtually nothing about the investigation on the top of his head he didn't recognize the name fusion GPS the company that hired Christopher Steele he didn't know key witnesses the only question he could answer without studying and flipping through the pages where when he was asked about recommending prosecution the congressional hearing of Robert Mueller showed that Graham Pah Mueller spent the entirety of the Mueller investigation looking for a slipper eating some food and tried to guess the puzzle before Vanna White turns all the letters it bays the question of Mueller didn't write his report who did well attorney and frequent talks news gas Joe DeGenerna has an answer to that he names Mueller's right hand man longtime Clinton lawyer Andrew Weissman as the author of the Mueller report Weissman has been a close personal friend of the Clinton's for years it was at Hillary's campaign party on election night in 2016 is also among the many members of Mueller's team who leaked communications revealed a disturbing anti-Trump bias but there's more disturbing things to know about Weissman once you hear them make you understand why the Mueller report while clearing Trump was so anti-Trump watch a video to learn more about the Mueller report author Andrew Weissman and let me say now I have just published the new book exposing the Russia moats how the deep state and the media conspired to a frame sitting president uh the Russia folks mythology was blown apart by the appearance of Robert Mueller before the Congress you've never heard of fusion GPS you didn't know what was in his own report and the world discovered it all been nothing but political theater to promote the democratic parties assault on Trump every American must understand exactly what happened here we have been subjected in nearly three years of propaganda where the key players knew it was a fabrication the public deserves to learn the truth about this monstrous deception it's all here between the covers of this book you don't want to miss it available as an e-book as an e-book for 995 132 pages covers the case from A to Z I recommend everyone consider this for your library and for your reading it will profoundly disturb you Scott Amen that's great yeah and uh you know the other the other implications of the Russia hoax gym I I returned to why all of this originally started what was it besides being a prejudice against Russia and a something that's rooted in a lot of people uh based on a religious antagonism to Russia there's a whole Catholic animosity that is against the Russian Christian Orthodox there's the uh you know Jewish Christian Zionism that is based on apocalyptic Gog and May Gog nonsense but the practical reality is in and I always return to this because it's just the one area that we knew in 2012 we reported everything in shellgame whistleblower.com and it was in 2015 when we were on RT and crosstalk and Sputnik and and presenting all of the stuff that links all of the terrorist financing and the pay to play and this was given to Trump it was given to Cohen it was given to Michael Aistings it was given to senators and congressmen like Diane fine sign and others and they they they they've tried to cover up a lot of this stuff I think using the the Russian hoax as if people working with or on the television of RT were Russian operatives and that's where they've granted RT and foreign intelligence asset which is all lies but they've been doing this to desperately cover up other crimes that need to be uh prosecuted and revealed and I think John Solomon and Sarah Carter have been doing a good job and there's a lot more to come out Jim. Don would you like to comment? No I'm just watching the time here. Go for it. I have an update here about the about the autopsy report that's just come in so let me read what it has to say. This is from conservative buzz. Here's what the coroner had to say. The coroner in charge of the examination of the deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has released a statement statement from chief medical example doctor Barbara Samson the beginning of the statement said today a medical examiner performed the autopsy of Jeffrey Epstein. The ME's determination is pending further information at the time west of those are every saying the deceit with the awareness of the federal prosecutor I allowed a private pathologist doctor Michael Baton to observe the autopsy examination. We are where we were before at the beginning nothing new here and I'm afraid to say that this is all another elaborate sham from the deep state. It looks as though we're back in the Russia hoax environment where deceit and deception is going to redominate in the mainstream meal media and if we're any have any luck at all we'll find some of the truth to what's going on here. Scott. Yeah I think we will and I think this is that you know the time when these things are known they need to be fully attacked and prosecuted just like the Epstein case and the abuse of you know the women this needs to be championed by other people in America Jim. Don I think we're there my friend you got to comment so anybody want to give another 15 seconds. Go to shellgame whistleblower.com for my information and Jim give your blog spot out people can put James Spencer dot org in my eye say there is more to come on the sandy hook lawsuit already partying next week. I wish me a it's all going to be positive but it looks as though it may not. Don I can't tell you how much appreciate these opportunities. My audience can't tell you guys how much they appreciate you. This is just fantastic you've been watching three Christmas news here August 12th right in the middle of all how this stuff you can imagine and I think we got to share this folks nobody else can do it for you. This is the time if you don't do it now it's going to be too late God bless thanks for watching.