RIP Alan Watt March 4th, 2021

Video Transcript:

Here is part one of our interview with Alan Wat. Alan is an author, radio host and deep researcher into the new world order's long-term strategy of eugenics and more. I'm Alan Wat and I've been following politics and geopolitics for a good part of my life. I didn't start off deliberately going out to find out so everything that was possibly going on and fight to had no idea, to be honest with you, have vast the scale of an agenda, political agenda is when you're bringing in a global society. Wars have many different purposes. Economics is only simply one big part of it, but culture change and the building of empire through the defeated nations, joining in leagues. Every country was basically signing the same laws and had been a my whole life. At the same time that affected their societies, laws were introduced and bills were introduced unbeknownst to the people in those countries that were being introduced in their neighboring countries or even across the water, so we're at the same time. I realized there was already a government or control, obviously, that's co-ordinated all of this and led me into the United Nations. For every single department of governments you have on a federal, local, county, states, provincial level, the United Nations had an equivalent department to deal with everything. It was already set up in fact to be global government. HG Wells said at the League of Nations, which was the embryo for the United Nations, he said, this is the nucleus of the world governments. When eventually all laws will come from there, be passed and signed into law by treaty of all the member countries. Eventually we won't even have to go through the farce and that's what it is of voting in parties or candidates because in a lot of part of the 20th century and now into the 21st century, we're being trained rather obviously to simply accept rule by experts, rule by scientists, rule by professionals and that's what they mean when they call government, governance, that's the term used. How did you get a domesticated herd to move from a field, a system in which it's been grazing for 20, 50 years? This kind of system, to this field over here, this new field because we have reluctance to change. We like familiarity, we like routine, you see? You do it by various techniques, one of which is revolution, most revolutions are bloodless. You have cultural revolutions, sexual revolutions, along with that comes the music revolutions, etc. These literally are designed to alter and direct culture, knowing what kind of culture they'll have at the very end of it too. They know exactly what kind of culture they want to come out of it. You also can do it through crisis creation. Crisis after crisis has been hit on the people of the world since 9-11 happened. And we must understand that the techniques that are used abroad are also used at home in warfare. And we heard the term shock and awe. Shock and awe on the hard, the hard force level, as they call it, is bombs, all kinds of acoustic equipment to nullify enemies, scare the hell out of them through voice, to your skull, and so on, which was used in Gulf War I and it's all over the British media. But you can also use shock and awe on your domestic people again. You do it by crisis after crisis until the public are so terrified. See, average person has a sort of confidence that they build up where they can think I can manage most things that come my way. Whatever little crisis in my life would hamster other people I can deal with. When all those around you are getting scared at the same time as you because of losing their jobs, they've been threatened with pandemics, terrorists everywhere, terrifying people to even get on subways, and so on. And all those around you, as I say, are also in the same box. You tend to be more easily directed by the powers that be that come out and speak with authority and confidence over you. That's why they give you a gal like Obama who's trained in oratory. He was trained in oratory, not in truth, but in oratory. The technique of persuasion, shock and awe, as I say, is a technique of making a person in a whole population punch drunk. And each one of those fears, you understand that each person can handle one major crisis in their personal life, maybe two at the same time. It's understood in psychology and many, many studies that if you have maybe three to four crisis hitting you personally and your life at the same time, you will literally go into an incredible depression, a reactive depression. You can't cope. That's understood. Apply that technique on a whole population. The thing is, there's not one of these crises that we've been told about that you personally can do anything about. What can you do about terrorism if it really exists all over the place? As out your hands, you're helpless. What can you do about a common pandemic as out your hands, you're helpless? What can you do about a nuke getting set off? And you, your carber or wherever, you can't, you're helpless. The message you're getting is that you're utterly helpless to defend, help or save yourself. That is complete shock and all-tactic. It's been used not only in the US and Canada, but across the world, same strategy, because we're already global with the global society running as all. Massive psychology and warfare techniques in psychology has been used across the planet to make us succumb to fear and crises, as I say, and none of which we can actually do anything about on an individual level. Therefore, the leaders have presented to us on screen with uniforms or business suits and ties as politicians who speak with confidence, all scripted, of course, and they seem to have everything under control. You're now basically a fearful slave looking up to the powerful master to defend and protect you. That's the simple technique of it. I've been speaking about the Rockefeller Foundation. I was mentioning the fact that in the United States, the Rockefeller Foundation, which also runs, I think it is the Carnegie Foundation today, maybe even the Ford, they're all combined. The families that are given the intergenerational rights, if you like, or authority to lead the world to amalgamation under global governance. Mr. Rockefeller also has heavily involved in the world depopulation strategies. He funds abortion clinics across the planet. He also funds hundreds of other front foundations that you would think were independent from his, but they're actually front foundations. He funds them all through his money. He entrace them all back again to so-called family planning clinics across the entire globe, especially in the third world countries. It seems that Mr. Rockefeller is intensely worried about overpopulation in the near future from countries which will have no industry, et cetera. And he sees it as his right to start the decimating process, basically, of depopulation. Last winter, I got an invitation to attend something called the World's Citizenship Council. The annual meeting. That can floor me because the head of the World's Citizenship Council is Mr. Rockefeller himself. And here I am speaking about and against them. So this did not come out of the blue. They try and get you on board working for them. What was also more startling was, they always give members, maybe 50 minutes or 20 minutes to speak, and I was offered that to speak on stage to this world meeting. The World's Citizenship idea is part of the old idea of Cecil Rhodes up into Lord Milner to the Royal Institute for International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Rockefeller is up on Google in some of his conferences giving out world citizenship awards to very famous people. So they've already bypassed and have bypassed sovereign nations a long time ago. What other benefits you get from being a world citizen, I'm not certain at all. But I was allowed, he said I'd be allowed to speak at this conference. He did not say what to speak about, so I didn't say anything of what not to speak about. And he also said that this chairman, of course, wrote to me. He also said that I'd be allowed to participate in the Round Table groups which come after. The Round Table Society is very, very important because the Round Table Society's work set up as far back as the Milner Society and the Rhodes Foundation became out with the first Round Table's societies. What they do is take the topics that are discussed at the main meetings, then they split off different tables to specialize in certain aspects of the speeches they've heard and find ways how to implement them into reality through media, promotion, various methods of propaganda and so on. I did not attend, I was tempted to go just to see if they would ask me not to speak about certain things. But it was a middle of winter and the journey to this university would have been pretty heck to Kenaway and I was so busy. But you will be approached and that's not the first time I've been approached to do this kind of thing. You'll find that some people are bought over, I should go back to Lord Bertrand Russell on this topic because Lord Bertrand Russell said in one of his own books, the same book in fact where he talks about those children who manage to escape then doctrinations who have intelligence and an ability to communicate to others must be brought on board the system employed by the system, bribed into the system if possible, that generally works with most people. He said otherwise we shall have to eliminate them because they did not want people around to understand an agenda that the general public are unaware of. They did not want these people with the ability to communicate information, documented information in a fashion that people understand out in the community where they could spread this word that ties in with Matsitong who said it was not afraid of armies, his worst fear was someone with a good idea, a great idea, a unique idea and the ability to communicate it. So that is how they treat basically people with information. First comes invitation to join them, many people do. As I say Bertrand Russell backed that up by saying if they can't be brought on board they must be literally eliminated from the public arena. That's how seriously they take this agenda at the top, they don't mess it around. The reason I think they don't simply come out and kill you straight forward is they don't have to do a message job as many ways of killing you, especially in this day and age. But I think to be honest they are so arrogant right now at this moment. They are not too worried about the mass of the general population who are indoctrinated and updated with their indoctrination, dearly from television as one example. But a hundred years ago this big organization with many branches, they wanted to rule the world basically using Britain as a nucleus of a system in embryo, which also was going to be joined with the US under the Anglo-American establishment, wrote about the kind of culture and the changes of culture over a hundred year period that they would actually design. We are all tribal to an extent, that's why we even bother to vote for a tribal leader. This is well understood, that's why we are supplied with these leaders. And because the average man was to become more disengaged from his own destiny as the expert class arose, it was decided that the males would get their outleg basically gradually becoming helpless as males through sports. Therefore they would have a tribal team they could identify with, they could cheer them on as they were winning in their own personal lives. They were getting nowhere, they were getting disenfranchised in a sense as experts took over decision making for them in all kinds of fields. So this was psychology, its use planned before they even implemented the sports. When radio came along of course they used that to the maximum sports for the men, radio soaps basically for the women. And then in Kim Television as I say with its alpha state, it's not a state. It's too cough, it really, really took off and men became glutes to the sports shows. The big think tanks, and we've had think tanks to do with always planning the future and how they create societies and even different cultures between within 100 years say from this type of society to that society to the next society, how they implemented. And again always through the youth culture which is easy to do if you have universal education. You know, always mandate the same system, same culture to be taught to the youth. However, since in 1960s, once television really, really took off, sports used to only come out on Saturdays and over a 10 year period gradually came on every night of the week. Until today we have even sports channels, sports, sports, sports. So now you see guys who are sitting home who are basically powerless at work, their bosses, their powerless on the roads, this police and traffic wardens and cops watching them. They have no means to feel strong. And so they tend to watch sports as a substitute. They project themselves into a game which they never participate in. But as long as they're team wins, they feel something's happening in their life that's positive and it's successful. It's a very good substitute for many, many things as far as their leader is concerned. Now the big think tanks that involved many professional people knew that they'd have to give something for the males and for the women to also give a substitute too. The intention being ultimately to alter a society drastically alter it so much that even the purpose for instance of marriage would lose any appeal. For the females they gave them high fashion, accessible prices for high fashion clothes. They brought in, people didn't realize they brought in the miniskirt back in the 1920s during prohibition. They brought in cocaine at the same time as long along with the booze to get young people in. The idea being that if you're doing something illegal it's very Nazi. Youngsters love to break the rules, get together, we're all being naughty together. And sex and booze coupled with coke being smuggled in at that time had a desired effects. But not quite the way it was designed to have by those that planned that culture the Bernays types. And Bernays was heavily involved in this. So they came out as they say with not sex and rock and roll but sex in a form of jazz. The Charleston dance came in, the miniskirt came in, sex became rather rampant for the first time. All the old traditional booze were broken with one generation. But there was fallout to this change, this massive change in culture. The fallout being that they did not have the antibiotics to treat all the sexually transmitted disease that came along. Secondly, they didn't have the legal abortion clinics to take care of the unwanted children that also were produced by hyper promiscuity. They opened up big orphanages to try and take care of this, the boy's towns, the advance for girls too. But there was so much backlash, especially in the United States, from the old Christian communities, that they had to tone it all down, it can have flopped to say sexually transmitted disease became rampant, so did unwanted pregnancies and abortions. And so they went back to the drawing board because remember, before this all happened, the big player is the new high priesthood we'll call them off. The time-laws, those who create the future, working think tanks for the big establishment, had a definite mandate. The only problem was how do you achieve that mandate over a time period. So they went back to the drawing board and they've always known, for instance, that war time and war time more children are produced because people, young people who might go off to die tomorrow, tend to be far more promiscuous. They brought this back after World War II big time. In Warton and Steadily, all our tax money went into one particular area of research, not just for the atomic weaponry and so on. They went into finding ways of finding a contraceptive that was effective. When they found it and launched it on the scene, at the same time as it was launched with the called pop music, along with drugs, LSD and so on, they brought it contraceptive. So then permission was given in a sense and promoted from the top down, even from the BBC, which is remember, the BBC is owned by the British government, it's an arm of the British government. It talks on behalf of the dominant minority who ruled Britain. So they began to promote all this stuff. All the DJs that bring on television would interview the top pop stars of the day that were all stoned at their minds. Some of them were falling out of chairs and the interviewers would say, Tee, he, aren't we not a children. All aimed at a young generation to emulate. This is what we do. Monk you see, monkey do. Once again, remember, the prime intent was to break the old culture of Boy Meets Girl going together for a while, getting engaged, getting married, having children. The family unit did said when they had the League of Nations, which was the precursor of the United Nations, said the task to destroy the family unit. Pretty well, all of HG Wells' nonfiction books promotes all of this agenda. And in fact, he coined the term in the late 1800s. This is how far back this agenda from the community had to go. He coined the term free love. And one of his books written before 91890, he says, we must promote free love in order to destroy and end the obsolete family unit. Once that's done, he said, the family is no longer in the way when government comes from an individual. Each individual will be sold responsible to the government itself. And no family will stand up around them like a primitive tribe and defend them. At the same time, the foundations within the United States and Britain and elsewhere were funding what appeared to be far left groups, communist groups. So much so as I say, the Rees Commission went into look into this from the 50s to find out why top capitalists who owned international corporations and banks, international banks, were putting up foundations to fund far left groups. Well, we know now it was to literally destroy the old culture in order to bring in the new culture, the new society. So therefore you have the proliferation of sexual activity. The fallout still came from unwanted pregnancies, far reduced and had been for because of contraception, but then came the lead of the feminist charge, again funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in the States to spearhead and demonstrate and demand the rights for abortion. If they could get the public to devalue human life and that's in the writings of Julian Huxley. He says, we can get society to devalue human life. He says, and take humanity off his pedestal as a supreme being on the planets. Then he said, we can bring in our controlled society with a workable population. Everything works within culture towards an agenda. And his Plato said, so long ago, over 2,300 years ago, he said, culture and cultural changes must be authorized from the top. If it's grass roots, truly grass roots, then it's outside of the elite's control and ripple effects could occur. And it could spread anywhere. They couldn't control it, contain it anymore. Therefore, the major changes in culture, which Plato said, came through drama and the emulation of actors, actresses, including fashions that they wore and the music they heard had to be strictly regulated and authorized from the top. The whole science of this, which was always a science, and understood by those in those businesses, was used to the maximum to literally drastically alter culture so radically in the 60s and 70s that they could never return to a past we are living. We tried that in with another big player, Lord Bertrand Russell, who had experimental schools under royal charter, where he could do things that anyone else would be locked up for doing. He said in his own schools, and there were mixed schools, he said that if he could encourage pre-puberto sexuality amongst the children, encourage multiple partners from before puberty. He says the chances, because of study and observation, the chances of them ever bonding with one person for the rest of their life was a pretty well obsolete null and void, wouldn't happen. Therefore, that technique all came into play during the 60s, it was called Fee Love, drugs helped it along the way, and that was the beginning of what we saw as short term relationships, divorces became more and more common, interesting enough, divorces really took off, not because society demanded it or it came from a need or demand from the people, divorces took off because the Hollywood stars, and remember two, the drama industry, entertainment industry, the people follow the stars, and they are the guiding stars, and they are so called occult to see. We tend to worship wealth and people and famous people, we want to be like them, we want to identify with them. The whole idea of divorces came out from Hollywood, the top stars leading the charge for this, women started to talk about it, who was getting divorced with actors from what guy and so on, and gradually put the idea across to them that while they were getting divorced, then maybe so should I. At the same time, the Burdais techniques were used through all kinds of magazines at that time, 97% of all magazine publications were aimed at women, because advertisers have said and still talks and marketing schools today, women are far more easy to go along with something new than meltmills are. So within all these magazines and write-ups about their famous actresses, their heroines and so on, the rich ones, the average women were reading new stories and identifying with them. They were being told that you can do anything, you can have it all, you can have a career, you can have a family, you had a home, they gave them utter lies, and they coined the term superwoman. So across the whole of Europe and the states in Canada, at the same time always coordinated at the same time, the media entertainment industry were pushed promoting stories of superwoman, and it finds someone real or imaginary, you'll never know, who supposedly was a CEO of a company who had all these children at home, had a great husband, could manage everything in a cook, great cuisine, blah, blah, and that of course is a fantasy. Let's put pressure again on most women to try and live up to the fantasy as all advertising does, and most of the stuff we're getting is advertising or at the very least is basic psychological manipulation. Vernays techniques again, remembering too that he called it the creation of a consumer of society, well-behaved people, as long as there's money going around, they would go into the material world and they would forego having children. That's the same thing as Charles Galton Darwin talks about if we can encourage the women and the male to go after the material benefits of the world, there's a slimmer chance they'll actually have children who tend to be economically burdened. People were addicted to television in a very short space of time. Most people still today think that all entertainment to do with movies, drama is there for nothing more than their entertainment? And never ever was that case. The greatest social messages are promoted through movies and drama, high drama, through the fixation of emotive sequences, emotional sequences, not logical factual sequences, pushing points across in an emotional way which register and fix in the mind. So emotional content is very, very important rather than going through other natural discussion or an argument using logic in fact. There's no debates. And when you're being downloaded through fiction, your guard is down, the sensor part of your brain is not in action as you would in a debate or lecture. You're actually in an alpha state being completely downloaded with new ideas. Very similar to computer. And so therefore, a culture industry which is called by its own, the culture industry. The Soviet Union had a department called the culture industry, their actors and directors were called the cultural leaders. All you have to do is keep giving them new updates every so often. Because you can change an entire country or a nation or a block of nations who are all getting the same uploads, upgrades at the same time, along certain paths. Today we call it political correctness. Most people want to belong to their peer group, they want to be the same as everyone else, where it comes to opinions. In fact, they judge their own personal sanity by bouncing ideas of their neighbors and friends who will answer back and agree on these same topics in kind. It doesn't matter if the topics or what you're given or facts are utter nonsense, as long as everyone agrees at the same time you say, well, I'm sane and your friends will all agree because they've had the same information given to them. We don't only get the same information given to us, we're led through sequences, even documentaries, to leave you with a predetermined fixed conclusion on any given topic. This is, once again, unaware of this. They think I've just been given all the facts on this topic, and this is the obvious conclusion, which is always given to you by the final experts on the particular program. There's no thinking involved. We tie this in with the Brzynski, Brzynski said in two ages. This guy was way up with the NSA. He was a master geo-politician. He works, say, at Missy, works in 2050 or periods to do with geopolitics in other countries, but he said himself that public will shortly be unable to think or reason for themselves. He says it was meaning by the form of information that was given to them the type, the formulas that were in use then in the 1970s. And eventually he said they will expect the media to do all their thinking and reasoning for them. Well, that's happened today. That's why people today can't think outside of the programming from television. It's given an instance, in fact, of why TV was so important to show you how it was so important to have it in the homes of ordinary people. Now most countries in Europe, for instance, up into the 1950s and 60s. And I'll give an example, it's Britain. The working class people did not have credit cards. You could not get a credit card. You couldn't get a bank loan without collateral to put something up against it. So therefore you were at a pretty well affixed income. There was no extra cash outside of rent, food, and so on, close for the children essentials. There was no excess for luxuries. There was no credit given to them. Yet the British government, just like the Chinese government did two years ago, made a demand date that every household in Britain must get a television set. And what they did, they made one exception out of all the things that the people could need, really needed. They made one exception. They allowed credit companies to come into being. They could go around the houses every week and collect half a crown or five shillings or whatever it was. And pay off a television set. The British government made a deal with the United States of America to buy and use televisions, which were then reconditioned to be sold to the working class all across Britain. As I say, they wanted a TV in every home. Now since when is government interested in how happy you are at home? There's another reason for this. And sure enough, the working class has all got these DER was the company that brought them all into Britain. And the guys came around every weekend, collecting their half-trivened five shillings. And suddenly this, and I can remember, probably it was one of the last areas really to get television, a real working class area. I can remember this high being taken by my parents to the local park on a weekend. And passing dozens and dozens and dozens of other couples on the way with their toddlers as well. When he got to the park, which was a valley, there were over maybe a thousand, a thousand and a half couples along the grass in the valley. And that's where everything was discussed. Local politics, national politics, labor unions to do with their mining and so on. And everyone mingled with everyone else, old-school friends and so on. That system had been going on for hundreds of years. Hundreds of years where people communicated, thoughts, real feelings, real things that really mattered to them and their communities to each other, conversation. When the TV came in, and I was still about this high, within about a month, I could go down that park every weekend and no one. I mean, no one was there. But literally overnight, killed off the socialization and interaction between people. And tradition, again, with exchanged viewpoints, gave each other news, helped each other out who was sick, who was this, who was that, everyone helped each other out. And from then on, you could pass rows and rows and rows of these old, and they were called row houses, all joined together. And all you saw at night was a flickering of that bluish light in the windows. And that was the end, that was the end of real communities. It happened within a matter of about a month. The flicker rate on the television is very, very important. It was times to be so many cycles per second and it actually just meets with the brain patterns from Alpha State. When our brain sees it through our eyes, we should be a satya adopt that flicker rate in our mind. And we're going to deep alpha state, watch children and watch their mouths. They drop open. They won't hear their parents talking. They're hypnotized in the fights. Why would they give you that particular flicker rate when they could have chosen of a whole variety of flicker rates? It wasn't an essential thing to have. It was done for a purpose. It was meant to be hypnotic. It was meant to be used as a tool of propaganda and indoctrination even through the guys of entertainment and so on. It also was to create a new society because they were the avant-garde, as I say, leading this sexual revolution through drama, through little documentaries, fiction, nonfiction, all combines. Once again, back to Plato, the audience see what they see. You understand that it's even worked out towards different age groups. There's something on for everybody. Everybody's age group. Each age group has actually been updated as well, even the elderly ones, into new ways of thinking or seeing things. But the target mainly was for youngsters. If we take one of the world's experts on propaganda who was Jack's elal, who wrote extensively on how the mind works and how all entertainment, he said, that has to do with government programs such as police, detective stories, detective series, which contain little human dramas as the hook that you identify with. To make you watch the whole story, child gets kidnapped, detective goes on a hunt, he goes through hell and water fire, to get that child back. You identify with the hero, if you're a male, you identify with the heroine, if you're female. That's the hook to get you to watch them. But what he said was, all dramas to do with police or even the military and movies are pure propaganda. The human story is just the bait to make you watch through it to get you to identify with it. Because once again, there's always a message left somewhere in the movie, it might even be a message that's against your own morality. It could be with a cop, for instance, does sleep with this beautiful woman while his wife was at home and it's all part of the story. And even tell you why he did this, he was feeling down that day, blah, blah, blah. And so you've just again altered your viewpoints on how you yourself might behave in that situation and it's sometimes that can, that can, I think, can be justified. That's how you're downloaded through entertainment. It's there to alter and direct and always upgrade into another step of the direction that the entire culture for someone else's purpose. Let's talk about the effects of the Alpha State first of all. Recent articles have even read on the air from various science studies. Show you that even when you switch off television, you remain in that Alpha State for maybe 45 minutes to an hour, sometimes longer, depending on how long you've been watching it. With high definition, again, why would a president of a country mandate that all TVs have to go high definition is because he really cares so much about your happiness? He wants better quality for you. Also, another reason for it. Well, I'm sure the effects of the old flicker rates and what it did will also be incorporated in high definition, but with even more added benefits for bringing you into a complete hypnotic state, how would you eat someone up who's addicted to television? You can't. Very, very simple. You can't get your daily brainwashing. We're literally bypassing any consciousness in the person. You can't take that every day and still try to wake up and learn at the same time. I've known people who've gone through complete withdrawal from television and going into depressions because the entire routine is broken. They also have time on their hands, which is a big aspect of control, remembered too. If you can take time away from a person who can think for themselves, who might say, I'll go and read a book, I'll go and study something, or if you can take that time away from them and have a mesmerizing front of a television set, then you'll keep them dumb, stupid, compliance, and going along with the system. I always advise to people, if you know someone who's watching TV, it's quite simple to find out where they are mentally, psychologically, in the understanding of things. You can ask them a few simple questions. If they give you standard television answers, forget it. Simple as that, forget it. If you see some spark of their own opinion coming in, there's maybe a chance you can do something with them. You cannot get a... You see, television can be classified as a drug. Any addiction is still an addiction. Television is an addiction. People watch for five hours per day. Top psychologists and even the United Nations have talked about the use of television for creating the new culture for children. How many people know that all government agencies or departments, all governments in the world, basically, have departments of culture which hire cartoonists and pay their expenses to do cartoons, always incorporating the latest political corrects story to do with environment, waste, bad adults, and how to destroy the planet through their consuming, etc. Have many people realize that you plonk your children down in front of it to babysit them that they're actually being brainwashed scientifically. And these cartoons were designed by experts to get their message across to those children implanted in their young minds, fixed in their young minds forever for their lives, ongoing daily, and even right down to the novels that you read the children, they're designed for children too, which won't cooperate all of this, all paid by government grants to authors and writers. You literally have to take it into your own hands. It's one of the most dangerous tools that can be used. It's also dangerous in this extent that why do you think government licenses TV stations? If you were an independent producer, TV station who came out with this kind of information, you would not get a license. You'd have to be authorized and politically correct with a whole bunch of things to do and not to do written out before you'd be given a license. And you'd be checked on every so often to make sure you were following those topics that you're allowed to. If you want to advise people on television, you can do this with yourself, how to train yourself, how to watch television. If you never get involved, you understand a storyline, you watch a movie, but don't get involved. As I say, there's always a thread or a hook for you to follow, a plot, whatever, the chase, the guy always ends up with the beautiful woman at the end after going through hell to rescue a child or whatever happens to be or save the world. If you can stop yourself from getting lost in the emotional part of it and study the movie as you're watching it, you'll learn the techniques that have been implanted in the movie itself. That's a great way to learn. If you can do it with yourself, you can also show other people how to do this, to actually study everything as it's been presented to you. And eventually what you'll find is that when you're watching even documentaries, you'll see how the documentaries themselves are shaped to give you the opinions, often very strong opinions without giving you specific facts or giving you distorted facts, etc. Learn how to critically analyze and think as you're watching. And if you can show others this technique, a good example is sit down with someone who regularly watches a good movie, one that you've previously watched, and then point out all the politically correct little inserted words, slogans, phrases that are put in there and show them how it's been done. That way you can actually be fun to study television and write down all the different things that they've missed, but it's all implanted subconsciously in their mind. Because those implants, subconscious implants will become their opinions and they will never know how they arrived at them. They won't remember it from this particular documentary, this particular movie or whatever. So that can also be fun. That's a positive side of it. You can train anyone to do this. With the internet, the first person to mention it that I know of, at least to the public, was again this master, Brzezinski, in his book Between Two Ages. In the early 70s he said, shortly a system will be given to the public of mass communication, which will cause a revolutionary thing to change society. But he also mentioned and hinted at the fact that there would be regulation behind it. He mentioned too that those who brought it in would never lose control, the main control over the internet because after all, knowledge is power. Knowledge has always been power. That's why all done through the ages, the real machinations of government are never told to the public. Real power comes from understanding and having all the facts on any particular topic. So therefore, the internet was to be given to the general public with other intentions. Initially it was to get them all into it. Now, what did the elite want to achieve? What was their point of view? They want people to become so used to the internet that they couldn't do without it. Now we see businesses really can't do without it. They can't imagine going back to pencil and paper and taking inventory and all this kind of stuff. For the youngsters who must be the generation that target, they made sure that that's the only thing I knew about the internet from the media. I was completely ignorant about it and computers. The only thing I knew was there was lots of pornography on it. The paper kept telling you about it, which again is the same old technique that used in the 60s and 70s, aren't we naughty? Wink wink for the rock stars on television. Knowing all the youngsters would get into it when their hormones are high, that's all they're thinking about. But once we're addicted to it, they've also planned to gradually alter it, keeping the people addicted to it as they changed it into another system. We're mainstream media, the authorized media, the culture creation industry media, would eventually have prime or the main dibs, the first grabs at the main bandwidth that eventually claiming will have to be reduced. So in the meantime, there's never been a window of opportunity for the general public to use a medium to communicate to each other alternate news, verified facts to each other as we have at the moment. That eventually, supposedly, is going to be pleased. They've had international meetings, the first one held in Canada, under the guise of the United Nations, or the auspices of the United Nations, to do with regulating and censorship of the internet. They have these meetings every year as they add more laws to it. We know the cloud system is to come in eventually, it's been all over the media and Britain, where you won't be able to store anything on a hard drive, you won't even need a hard drive eventually. Remote servers will have all your information for you. It will then be used as a form of punishment if you were politically incorrect in some form or another. And then you will cut off from accessing that server with all your data until you tow the line and behave yourself. Social control can be used through money, monetary penalisations or through other penalisations like withdrawing your access from it. It definitely will be used for social control again unless it's a backlash from the general public. And they do expect back lashes from people who have become used to looking to, wherever a site they wish to look at, or communicating whatever kind of information they want to to each other. Now along with the introduction of the internet, we've got to remember too, the government agencies also set up and promoted chat rooms and all the rest of it. And there are agents within this strange nether region called the internet whose job it is to infiltrate people who are coming together as groups, communicating on specific topics to do with political changes and disrupting those groups. So already it's a battlefield and they call it the cyber war as long before they even give this internet to the people. It has been an informational war. They said in all the papers. Therefore government intelligence agencies would have to expand their roles with mandates to also be in this invisible world where they would manipulate various groups from within as well. There's also a lot of nonsense, of course, on the internet too, which can take you down conspiracy paths. I hate to term conspiracy because the government wants us to use it like we're some sort of hobbyists and some sort of cooks. I don't use the term. But that's become the most popular type of site now as conspiracy sites. And there's many out there, there's professional agents out there as well, who've been funded by governments and even launched by governments to be well known, especially in Europe, to lead the conspiracy sites. Then they bring in the UFOs, the aliens, until you have achieved your goal. Counterintelligence. Let's talk about counterintelligence and how it works. Terrorist intelligence, intelligence gathering is sending agents out to simply listen. The listen in marketplace, bars, cafes, as to what the people are discussing. Lawrence of Arabia in his own book, Seven Pillars of Wisdom, was trained as an agent. He was trained in Arabic languages. He was given lots of money. He and 11 other people trained from Cambridge and sent over to the Arabic countries to start up Arabic newspapers. Once they started putting stories in the newspapers, they went around the marketplaces, they hired lots of guys to listen to gossip. To see if the intelligence they were putting out in the papers was being discussed by the recipients, the readers. That's basic intelligence gathering. What is counterintelligence? Counterintelligence from a government's perspective is taking information and data that could be crucially, it could be bad for the ruling regime. Finding ways to counter that knowledge, counter it, what you do, standard wise, if you can't defame the person who is bringing out a truth or a kill them, is to bring out your own heroes, launch them well, finance them well into the same area, saying the same stuff that others are talking about, it's called intelligence, giving out facts. Once they have the following, then they start bringing in aliens and UFOs and they bring in the new age, the whole new age religion into its spirituality is the big term they're using today. Until a newcomer, a skeptic, will hear this stuff from the paid agents who is very good, who gives the same data as the person who doesn't go into the UFOs and so on. But the guy who doesn't go into the UFOs, aliens, reptilians and all the rest of it, suddenly is thrown out with the other guy. You're classified with them by association, your topics are associated, even though you stay clear of the fantasy stuff, the disinformation, you'll be lumped along with them and then you've countered the intelligence. When you mention the facts, people laugh at you say, oh, you probably believe that the aliens are running the world now and that's it. That's counter intelligence and that is also all over the internet and it's paid for by again government science operations. Some groups that have found are doing really good work where people decide to get together physically and they will choose a book to read, to do with the factual data that's available to the public, they can be proven. Oh, Harry Kissinger. And they'll go through it, they'll analyze the book, they'll analyze the phrases, they'll analyze the contents. They start to participate in what they're reading because others will remember this particular era, this time when this event happened, can add to the thing and so on. This participation, that's communication and other information as I say from those involved who live through things can be added to the whole thing, giving you a much more complete picture. So it's a good idea to take, to start this kind of thing off in your local area, even there's only two of you that started off. Don't sit in laugh, it's kind of comical at first, we say, oh, we're going to discuss this book, you've never done anything listening to lifetime, sit down and get some coffee or a beer or whatever you need. And take turns at reading and ask the other guy, do you have anything to add? Well, I've just read, do you have any insights into what do you think of this? It gets you stimulated into participating and really thinking because everybody who's alive today has been trained literally not to have to think. As Ruzinski said, shortly the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves, they'll expect the media to do their reasoning for them. So let's counter that, let's get back to thinking for ourselves, using the data material, get involved, start using our minds again. And you'll be surprised, it's like a muscle you haven't used for a long time, how quickly you start to use it, how sharp you become so quickly. And you can get larger groups and larger groups together doing the same thing and then you can branch them together, communicate together. And they suggest other books that you haven't heard of. Maybe you need a particular book for evidence, I have stacks up on that home. Everyone has access somewhere to some material that's stuck away. And when you start putting all of this material together, mainly through, as I say, discussion and reading groups, you can add to the knowledge. The more knowledge, in fact, actual factual data you can put together, the bigger your arsenal is. And the easier it becomes to show people and convince them, this is authenticated stuff. Here's the factual data, here's the physical book, read from that book, and then have your discussions, what do you think about this? What do you think they meant by this? What do you think has happened? Have they fulfilled this part of an agenda? And most of us say, yeah, they have. Well, here's how they did it. The evidence is all there, but knowledge, remember, is scattered. That's also why, since the 70s and so on, televisions were put up in places where people used to communicate to each other, bars and restaurants, the pubs of Europe. Everyone talked and discussed everything. The televisions were all put in for a reason. And now everyone's mesmerized and you can hear sports or loud music, you can't communicate anymore. That was government promoters, because the government licensed the big chains of taverns and pubs all throughout Europe. And so we have got, really, as deliberate attempts, nothing happens for no reason. Why? The customers weren't demanded, they were bored and bars, as they discussed topics. People would just move around the pub talking and listening to the conversations and they join in the one that they liked. Why was it so important to destroy communication? It's because it's a main propaganda tool, it stops communication between people even in a room. If you notice, too, they don't even discuss the topics, once the news is read to them, to each other. They're both been downloaded with their opinions, you don't have to have to ask what their opinion is, it's going to be the same one as you've been downloaded with, left by the expert. So we've got to get back to communications and communicating with each other and finding the evidence, knowledge is scattered. Knowledge is power, so it's scattered all over the place and thousands of books. But when you can start these reading classes up and get other reading classes communicating with you even through the internet, you can start putting the data, the factual data together, and so that you can present it to the public and bring in more and more members. Only knowledge and the will to use this knowledge is going to thwart the plans that have have openly been made for us and declared from the elites at the top. The whole problem of being involved in a community, it came with double-edged sword. We know, for instance, that commuterionism is a term used first by Bush senior talking about the collective of society coming in. The United Nations has as all split up into communities, it's promoted through local TV, even Sudbury here, has your community, this is your local community, be involved in your community. They're talking about a politically correct community, that's the problem. Government really penetrated and altered and distorted and changed society through communities, not just with television which has certainly destroyed the community's spirit. In terms of governments, this is how abusers work too, abusers work with the same technique because they want power over a victim. The abuser will come in and take care initially of problems of the abused. Often the problems are the very outcome of what the abusers have been doing to the victims in their first place. Parents came in with welfare, for instance, a long time ago in all countries about the same time. At one time families helped each other out, you didn't need welfare. If someone lost their job, everyone chipped in, you didn't condemn the family member for being unemployed or ill or whatever or losing their job. Families helped each other, the family member is still really the smallest nucleus of a tribe. Then government came in with unemployment insurance which they took off you, but nothing was for free. Gradually over time, when people became unemployed or even sick for a while and couldn't work, I heard people even say to their own relatives, go to welfare, that's what they're for. There are social agencies to deal with this. Until today we're in a sad state where even close relatives won't help each other out. They expect the government. The abuser, the government is the abuser. They expect the government to take care of all financial problems for the unfortunate victims and stop helping each other out. We've got to start reclaiming the rights and you can do it personally with people you know to help other people out and start countering the government's mandate. The government's mandate is for control over the victims, not to help the victims. Those who fall under that particular level into the welfare state have their lives run by government agencies and social workers. That's what Huxley says. He says they won't need their survival capabilities. Russell said the same thing because the government is taking care and making all their decisions for them. Norther, help you. It's really to take you over and have you obeying them and their system. Let's put you up against a planned war strategy, making them dependent upon government services not their family, not their brothers and sisters, their fathers and mothers, but on the state itself. We've got to counter that and come involved again in the lives of those around us and have our own troop communities. It doesn't matter if it's only five of a unit community, even if you live in a town or a city, that's your own little community. We all have something in common. What really is is getting knowledge for your own and others self-preservation survival into the future. I would like to one yo If you can understand the past, you understand the present or the future. I've also been in the music business, heavily involved for years. And I saw how culture creation worked from the top and how generations were swayed into new fashions, new ideas. I've been following the histories of what's now called the New World Order for many, many years. And I tried to go into the books written by the big players, the technocrats themselves, those famous people like the Kissinger's, the Bersinsky's and so on, the Huxley's, the Lord, the better and Russell's, who all worked for the same organizations. And I came to the conclusion really, there was only one big organization with many subcategories. These boys tend to publish the worlds that they saw coming into view. And they wrote it in their own hand basically, they told us where they were taking the world. And when you start studying these things about the age of 14, 15, or even younger, and reading their books, and you live long enough, you will see that the world has turned out exactly as they planned. This can't be coincidence. And who can really write about wishlist and make it happen globally, unless there is an organization very, very powerful, probably the only organization really on the planet. An organization that can fund all sides, all oppositions, and using the synthesis of conflicting parties, they can literally make the world come into view as they planned. The plan in centuries, and the astonishing thing is when you go into the United Nations, which was loosely based on the Soviet system, they plan certain parts of their agenda in 50-year plans, some in a hundred-year plans, and some even in a hundred and fifty-year plans for different aspects of it. The Russians, the Huxley's, and so on, Bysinskis also use the same terminology with the long-term plans. And you've got to understand too that nothing in culture comes out from the grassroots. Even Plato talked about that thousands of years ago. He said that if it was a grassroots movement really coming from the people, then those in charge, the dominant minority, would lose control. Therefore, every change in culture, right down to fashion and music, and this was written 2,300 years ago, had to be authorized from the top and promoted from the top, if it fitted with the continuance of control over the public. And these are sciences which were taught down through the ages, are still taught today to the big players, and they've used it to the full in the 20th century, now into the 21st century with the use of television, mass communications, radio, etc. Everything has been given to us for the appropriate time and stage in the actual planning. And for those who are coming into this kind of study, it's best to go into the books as I say, written by the big players themselves. They love to boast. Kissinger's got lots of books out there, so has Brzynski. These are probably two of the master players in geopolitics, trying to stay away from all the conspiracy books. They're also put out there on purpose, very fascinating books, but the Legion circles forever without giving you the overall picture, to the fact that every generation has a purpose up until this present time, and in a post-industrial era, these big boys have decided, and they're masters too, that we are simply superfluous, and they no longer need us. Hence, we have big foundations coming forward, and organizations like the optimum population trust, who have decided to come out openly, and demand that governments start radically reducing the populations. We are now the useless eaters as Lord Bertrand Russell called us. We have ideas or opinions on everything, our worldview, even to do with population, and the fake view that we're overpopulated, as all projected to us by the mainstream media, working in concert for their masters, and we begin to parry it to what we hear through repetition, and that's so important as repetition with slogans and catch phrases. And once you hear it happening in your own local group here, and you know it's working, and the camera can make anything appear to be true, you'll see that in India, for instance, they always use the same streets of Bombay to make you think that you're massively overcrowded, and that's the impression people think of the entire Indian continent. Indian continent is huge, with thousands and thousands of miles, or forest where no one lives. As the same in Africa too. China, being the model state for the world, for instance, put into effect the United Nations policy to the extreme, with its population reduction, and the movements of people off of the rural areas into cities, they said that years ago. Right now, they're in the process of moving 200 million more people off into the major cities, and that's the major newspapers. The cities appear to be crowded, because everyone's been moved into them. In the Western world, since the 1950s, again, under the term of urban sprawl, and stopping urban sprawl, the Western countries also signed agreements to do no more building in the outskirts of the major cities. All existing buildings have to be used, or else not done replaced with even higher ones, but regardless, with the immigration and the free flow of people now from third world countries, the Western countries appear to be overcrowded. And yet, the UN's own statistics show, and so the national census show that the Europeans, for instance, Canadians and Americans, who have been here for a couple of hundred years, are actually in decline. So, the overpopulation problem is simply an image projected by the media, as more and more people are crammed into the same cities and the big more immigrants into film. But I also realized the system of schooling, when I was going to school, was bogus. The histories were bogus, and I was very, very lucky to have access to very old libraries, very old libraries, time libraries. Some of them had reference books going back into the 1700s, written at the time. When you compared the histories I was being taught in school, to the histories that were written at the time, they were completely different, yet a deeper understanding of how geopolitics had been used in the past to even populate the country of Canada. London couldn't get immigrants to go off into the new colonies. What they did for Australia was to create so many laws that you couldn't have that break them, and poverty, and therefore stealing a loaf of bread to feed you your family would get you deported to Australia with your family. That's how they populated Australia, crime. They created the laws for crime. With Scotland, they had a rebellion, which could have been rigged, and often think it was, and the whole of Scotland was punished, and they deported millions of the Scots off to the Americas, to populate the Americas. This is geopolitics in action. That's how it works. And whole peoples are often moved from their land because the elite masters want them elsewhere to be productive. For them themselves, the masters. When you look at the strategy for the US and Canada, again long-term strategy, long-term planning, you'll find that the big corporations of their day, the Hudson's Bay companies, the Fraser companies, were given charters to own the land before Canada was Canada or US was the US. They recently called the Americas. These are private international corporations that the power of life and death over everyone who lived within their areas. The Queen or the King had a consulate in every country, Lieutenant General, or Governor General, they call them. We still have one in Canada today, who represents the Queen. They have all the powers over life and death of subjects under that governor. How these stopped rebellion in the past was to give us an idea of what they called democracy. They knew from the charters movement and Brits, for instance, and elsewhere other countries, people were demanding rights for the first time. And so once again, they gave us champions to speak on our behalf, which calmed the people down thinking for the first time in history the people were involved in their own destiny creation and nothing was further from the truth. Because the planar is new, that once you bring people into a country or a consulate, create real wealth for them and get businesses going, clear the land, drain the swamps, and so on. They can take it all away from you through laws, 200 years down the road, and that's what's happening now. Long-term geopolitics once more. And if you think I'm kidding about this, go into the history books written at the time. They're still there in some of the libraries, and you can also go into the art of geopolitics, there's even videos on YouTube on Brzynski, boasting about how he set up the Taliban, the Afghanistan. You'll see him encourage them to fight the Soviets at that time in the 1970s, and he actually says, yours is a holy war. This man, who obviously believes in nothing but himself in his own peer group, has encouraged another people to go and fight a holy war a G-Head, and he uses these terms against the Soviets. Knowing full well once it was set up and was backed by the CIA, that 10, 15 years down the road, did be a problem, and then they'd have to go to war with a very group that created to fight the Soviets. That's what's happening today. Long term strategies. Well, that's how history has always been run. If you can go into the books where you find the British Home Office is mentioned, study the history of the diplomatic core, because the diplomats were spies. They would go into territory set up embassies, collect intelligence data for future invasions. Their job was also to try and grab the rights of minerals, gold, silver, etc. across the planet. All natural resources. And find ways long-term strategy to either bribe it off the present rulers of those countries or else create an ultimate war with them in simply steelots, under the guise of occupation. We're living through a stage today as I say, where this is all coming to a culmination. This is the post-industrial era, where post-technical almost in the West, it's all done in other countries, all the technical stuff. And Brzezinski himself talks about the technocratic era, where the future will be for an elites, with a highly trained bureaucracy underneath them, and scientific elite, who will not need the human labor that they've needed in the past. Human labor that is excessive and is unemployed and is hungry, is now a threat to that established elite. So now, they're doing something which they can only do to the human species. They don't need to do this with animals. With animals, they just go out and hunt them and kill them. We are the only species that has to be convinced to allow ourselves for the good of all to be sterilized and bring down the population through abortion and one end and euthanasia on the other, under the guise to save the planet. And unfortunately, with massive propaganda campaigns, they're all over media and every country at the same time, with all the big foundations backing them with unlimited financing. Remember, the two foundations are owned by the international bankers themselves. Then they can pull all of this off, and unfortunately it really is working. In kindergarten now, you're working to a kindergarten anywhere in Europe or in America. And you'll see the rainbow inside every single one of them. You'll see all the terms, but the world here is the globe, we're all global. And you'll see the greeting messages everywhere, everywhere. And how sacrifice will have to be made to save the world and the planet and future generations of society, sacrifice. You tie that together with the institutions that were comprised of the Fabian society, it was a member of the Royal Institute for International Affairs as one society. The constant form relations is also the same thing as the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They are what that year and Professor Karla quickly called the Parallel government. They have told us where the future is going to be. Some of their members have even written books about the need to call off massive amounts of the population by any means possible. And so we see this final stage being pushed as the convinces that we are the problem. The club of Rome that also belongs to the same group in the 1990s. The two founders said that back in the 1970s at the club of Rome, they were given the task as a premier think tank for the globe, this global society. The task defined ways of reducing the population and controlling the people to go along with this, convincing the public how to go along with it. And they said they looked at all possible means of doing so. Wha