UK Column News - 2nd August 2024

Video Transcript:

Good afternoon. It's Friday the 2nd of August 2024 just after 1 o'clock. Welcome to UK column news. I'm your host Mike Robinson joining me today by video link. We have Marc Anderson from the United States and Debbie Evans. Welcome to the program both. Now we're going to get started off with carestomers announcement yesterday of a new aspect of policing in the UK that follows on from the violence that there's been on the streets over the last few days. Let's have a listen to this. A gang of thugs got on trains and buses went to a community that is not their own, a community grieving the most horrific tragedy and then proceeded to throw bricks at police officers, police officers who just 24 hours earlier had been having to deal with an attack on children in their community, their community. And let me be clear the meeting this afternoon was not about pointing the finger of blame. That is not how this Government of Service conducts its business because it doesn't work. Rather this was a meeting to pull together our response. Response both to the immediate challenge which is clearly driven by far right hatred but also all violent disorder that flares up. Whatever the apparent cause or motivation we make no distinction. Crime is crime and so to that end I can announce today that following this meeting we will establish a national capability across police forces to tackle violent disorder. These thugs of mobile they move from community to community and we must have a policing response that can do the same. So a new policing response to deal with this kind of violent behavior they're talking about local insight and data being used to gain a national understanding of where these criminals are operating including the British transport police alerting when they see a spike in train ticket sales that could be linked to organized violent disorder. They're talking about it considering how we can deploy facial recognition technology which is already used by some forces more widely across the country. This will mean criminals can be targeted, find and brought to justice quickly. Now a lot of people were unhappy with what was presented by Charles on Wednesday's program and perhaps what I'm about to present isn't going to make it any happier because we've got to ask ourselves some serious questions here. The Government has responded in this way to what has happened over the last couple of days or at least this is their claim. They're claiming that this is a response, a direct response to what has happened over the last couple of days. I would suggest to you that actually this is something which has been building up for much much longer. If we go back to 2017, the UK column was reporting this is Sajid Javid and he was saying at that time ISIS and right-wing extremists both exploit grievances, distort the truth and undermine the values that hold us together. And this perhaps might seem ironic in some ways that the UK Government of the day was attempting to conflate ISIS terrorists with far-right extremists. This was 2017 or so. We were starting to see this narrative of the rise of far-right extremists starting to build in the mainstream political and media narrative. But if we bring him back on screen again and then move to Nick Bazo who was at that time the met Metropolitan Police, kind of terrorism assistant commissioner, he said I'm worried that the radicalization of some of the most vulnerable people in our society, namely our children, is happening both from the Islamist and extrem right-wing ideologies. And again, we're saying the same narrative, this conflation of left and right or perception of left and right. Terrorism in the West said the Henry Jackson Society and age of extremes, a new pattern of far-right offenders, emulating or copying the tactics of high profile Islamist salons. And we start to see this narrative being built, it's not organic, it's not happening, it's not grassroots, it's being created by the state. We start to see in the Times, Tory turmoil could lead to a far-right revival over the overt message here. If we look at the text, the return to dominance of the two main parties, which saw labor and the Conservatives share right 80% of the vote was one of the most surprising consequences of the referendum two years ago. It left many in the center of ground pining for a new party. So this is from 2018 and they're talking about a new extreme right-wing party appearing. And of course, that's exactly what has happened. The reform party has appeared. It's mainstream, it's right wing. It has taken over a certain amount of the narrative from the Conservative party and my question is, was that something which happened organically? Or was that something that was arranged? In the meantime, we started to see the propaganda. So apps coming out from various police forces around the country cross the line, how far would you go? This was targeted at the young, all designed to an inverted commas prevent the rise of right-wing extremism. When in fact, what it was intended to do was the exact opposite. We started to be bombarded with mainstream media headlines, Boris Johnson being spineless about not dealing with the Berkha Roy at the time, the Daily Telegraph. Johnson refuses to back down on Berkha's. In the meantime, we have burgeoning immigration and the collapse of our infrastructure, putting pressure more pressure on people. The NHS is collapsing, collapsing, leading, leading medic warns. Thames water, Sunak and Starmer will both be dreading the most likely option for utility at risk of collapse. And this is right across the country. Other headlines, how do we tackle the UK's housing crisis? So at the same time that they're pumping up migration, and that's just reminder cells of this graph, 1.2 million people coming into the country in 2023 and 500,000 people leaving the country in 2023. So significant that migration, putting pressure on while the government is allowing infrastructure to collapse. This of course puts people in a state of stress and they start looking for leaders. And the question then is what kind of leaders do they migrate to? Well, let's bring one of them on screen. When you see these communities and you see these houses, you think this is a British community, or you might have British Muslims, they are enemy combatants in these houses. In these houses are enemy combatants who want to kill you, main you and destroy you. They want to destroy our way of life. Now that's not a peaceful narrative there. This is absolute clash of civilizations, narrative that was being pushed out. And who is behind the clash of civilizations ideology? You need to look into that. When we start looking at other leaders, let's look at Tommy Robinson Light. So here's Starmer standing in front of his double cross there. And this morning, who did we have also in front of his double cross? Virtue signalling, is he what he telling us here? I'm going to suggest that we are being played. And when we're looking as members of society and citizens, what not, for people to lead, we've got to be careful about who it is that we are asking to lead. Now the next point, here's the Metro from a few years ago, London police take the knee with Black Lives Matter protests. Does anybody think that this was by accident? What was this design to do? It was designed to enrage a certain part of the population. In fact, it was designed to suggest it was designed to radicalize a certain part of the population and drive people towards a right-wing extreme. This is building the right-wing extreme in my opinion. Then over the last couple of days, we've seen this as the Palestine protests have seen other influences begin to move in. We Brian and I visited and Ben as well visited the Palestine protests some months ago. And we find it to be extremely peaceful, extremely decent people in general. But now we're starting to see this. And if we just zoom in on the flag on the left here, well, first of all, Alan Miller saying ISIS and Hamas flags, well, let's look at the ISIS flag on the left. This in fact is not an ISIS flag. It's an al-Qaeda flag. But we've got somebody who's masked up there with a red bandana and carrying the flag. Who is this person? What's he doing there? Is he a genuine pro-Palestine protester? I would suggest he is not because if we look at where that flag comes from, this is the Syrian Revolution Memory Project. And of course, this is the terrorist groups that the British government funded in Syria, the anti-Assad terrorist groups that the British government funded in Syria, now on the streets of Britain, in amongst people protesting what's going on in Gaza. But these people were funded by the British state in Syria. And these people have made death threats against finessebili amongst others. So these are not good people. They're not. And my question therefore is what are they doing amongst this protest? Are they there to wind up a certain section of the society? And I would just make the point that if we remember this piece of legislation which is not an act of parliament, the covert human intelligence sources criminal conduct bill, and we have to ask ourselves if we are living in a regime where the government is prepared to say that an agent of the state is able to commit breaches of the laws, to break the law, then to what degree does that end? Where does that end? There's no limitation on these covert intelligence sources, the kinds of laws that they can break. So would it be beyond the British government to be running a psychological operation on us? Let's not forget this lady, Juliet Harcan, formerly BBC Media Action, talking about their efforts to bring opposition into the streets in Syria. Again, is this the kind of thing that we would not also see in this country and let me remind you about the integrated operating concept, which is Ministry of Defense doctrine in the UK, making it very clear that the enemy is not just abroad, it's also at home. We are being played. So I'm going to say that if we think if we're going to focus on the enemy as being this lot on the left, we are looking at a symptom and that is the wrong target. We need to be focusing on the enemy on the right because this is a disease that is bringing people into the country and the numbers that they're coming into. And there are a number of voices in this country that are operating on behalf of the problem on the right there because the people that are reacting to those people in the way that they are are giving care, Starmer and his state infrastructure. They go ahead therefore to bring in more and more draconian rules, which is supposed to be what we're fighting against in the first place. I'm starting to see things like on X, the lion had a little growl yesterday, we had to let FN Roars. If the lion roars in a violent way, we are playing into the hands of the state. There are other ways to deal with this. For example, stop funding the state. That might be a place to start. That's a peaceful action that can be taken. Stop funding the state and they will get the state's attention very quickly. There is no need to go around destroying our own communities, infrastructure, what's going on around us. I completely understand and get the frustration and I understand why the narrative that Tommy Robinson and people like that would be attractive to people. But I strongly urge that we consider what is happening here and how we are being played. That's my thoughts on this. Debbie, if you've got any comments, do you disagree with me? I'm quite happy if people disagree with me. You can fight me in the comments in the chat box and in the forums and on YouTube and so on. But what are your thoughts on this? Oh, well, good afternoon, everybody. And I know I agree with you, Mike. And I think that this is a deliberate attempt by Kierstama to disrupt the British public to make them angry. Of course that angry. Of course, the British public are angry, but he wants us to be angry. He wants division. He wants any excuse to come down hard. And we said that change was going to be happening. And he's only been in government for weeks and I'd say already we're starting to see that. And isn't he the prime minister that wants to let out loads of prisoners out of prison early? Is that to disrupt perhaps? Very good question. What happens when we start? Well, we can talk about that more in extra, but Debbie, let's move on then to, well, some of the future. Now this is something that you've talked about and I've talked about in the past, but many people aren't even aware of it. This perhaps is even more egregious than the World Health Organization and their efforts at undermining state sovereignty. Yes, it really, really is. And happy holidays to everybody. If you're out and about enjoying the fine weather because behind the scenes, there's plenty going on and parliaments out, schools out. Everybody's maybe on holiday watching the Olympics, but what is going on behind the scenes and even actually in February on Valentine's Day, February 14th, I was talking about the summit for the future and I was warning about it and I want to revisit it now because we'll be looking at two words in particular, you're two new buzzwords, which will be peace and security, but that really doesn't mean what it says. So let's remind ourselves that the great reset started with Prince Charles back in 2021 when he announced it at the World Economic Forum. So this was in my opinion the first phase of the great reset and I've been looking at all of these summits and I thought, well, actually, what does the word summit mean? So this is what the word summit means. It means the highest point, IE, you know, somewhere like Everest, the top most level attainable, the highest level of officials, a conference of high, highest level officials, such as heads of government. So we know that this is a high level meeting. So I went to the Council of Councils and ironically, the Council of Councils is actually, it's been created by the Council on Foreign Relations water surprise, but it's a think tank and it serves to facilitate dialogue between 27 major policy institutes from the world's most influential countries and it publishes a nice handy guide as the global summits we should be looking out for. So here's the guide. This if you want to go online and look for the guide, you can see I think that's, yes, that's it, global summits to watch in 2024. So which ones do we need to watch in 2024? We've already had a few of which we've discussed earlier on in the year, but these are the ones I want to focus on in particular. So in September, we've got the summit of the future. In October, we've got bricks and that's going to be chaired by Russia in October and we've got the World Health Summit, which we'll come on to later in the news. And in November, we've got COP29 and G20. So we've got a very busy eight weeks of high level meetings and decision makers. So let's start at September 2024 because the summit for the future is really important and they've already called to arms, you know, urgent call to countries to accelerate the delivery of the sustainable goals. Well, I call them unsustainable quite frankly, but why? Why are they in such a rush? Well, they're blaming conflicts like Ukraine and Israel for a delay. And so now they've only reached 17% of their goal. So they're way, they're falling short big time. So I thought I'd go to the World Economic Forum like you do to check what they're saying. And they seem to be referring to the summit of the future. And thank you to the personal Twitter who said to me, oh no, you're using Jonathan Van Tam's analogy. No, I promise you I'm not, I'm using the World Economic Forum, who refer to the summit of the future as a football match. And they reckon now that they need to go back to the locker room. They need to re-strategize because the game is going to be lost or won in the second half and they stress the importance of this summit. But what's it all about? Because they call it multilateralism. That's the name that they actually call it. But in my terms, this means global governance. So I've got a little short video just to explain. Have a look at this. Is the multilateralism we have today capable of managing the global challenges we're experiencing? Welcome to the UN Library and Archives Geneva. We're here at the comments our space for sharing knowledge and debating questions on multilateralism. This is the journey to the summit of the future. In the lead up to this unique UN meeting in 2024, we're exploring with experts the questions we should be asking to ensure effective and inclusive multilateralism for today and for the future. In his report, our common agenda, the UN Secretary General called for the summit of the future as a critical moment for members of the UN to consider how to build more effective global governance capable of dealing with today's challenges and those to come. The summit is expected to create a new pact for the future and revive global solidarity for current and future generations. So through this playlist, we're talking with experts and practitioners in the lead up to the summit. And these conversations explore the ideas raised in the Secretary General's policy briefs, as well as the proposals from the report of the High-Level Advisory Board on effective multilateralism. What kind of multilateralism do we need for our future? So let's return to the United Nations themselves and look at the next chapter. So they have now published the next chapter where they're predicting their 80% of the world's young people will all live in Africa and Asia by 2100. So that's a pretty big ambition. But what are their key messages? Their key messages are to prioritize young people to let the young lead the way. That's if they're not bumping into lampposts absorbed by their phones, I should add. They want you to act now for the future to ditch the pessimism, embrace the courage. It's all about sustainable goals that in my opinion, and this is my opinion, that are unsustainable, and it's very generation-centric, cover all generations. But what's the pact for the future? Because the pact for the future is a pact. So I looked very closely at it and it seems to be a global quarter action for peace and security. So peace in my language means your silence and censorship and security means their security. We get tracked and traced, but it's looking at the sustainable goals, financing for development. It's looking at tech innovation, digital cooperation, the youth again, and we've got two annexes there, the global compact declaration and the declaration of future generations are come onto that in a minute. But we've also got an engine room for the young. So we've got an engine room youth survey where it would appear that the young are quite happy to be taxed on luxury items for the good of the planet. So you can't have a plain ticket without extra tax because that goes to the planet. They want to create a platform for young dreamers and you can be a guardian of tomorrow and apparently whales have already got a commissioner for future generations. But they've got three more aims as well and their three aims are global digital compact. Which is basically military applications of artificial intelligence. They want a special envoy for future generations and an emergency platform which really covers all bases and puts all member states into lockstep depending on whether it's a health emergency, whether it's a cyber emergency, whatever it is. But what's the future beyond 2024? They've got a little roadmap and here's the little roadmap. So we're looking at Beijing 30, the World Social Summit. That's the news of its own COP 30 and the 2027 SDG Summit which is going to be the last checkpoint between the 2030 agenda. So that's why they are in a rush and I've got one little bit more video very quickly to show you which is about the summit of the future. The summit of the future is about how we cooperate at the global level to solve our biggest shared problems. And that includes the problem of not having implemented and not having reached some of the goals that we've already agreed including the sustainable development goals, the principles of the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and so many other goals and agreements that we've already reached that would really deliver the future we want. But it's also about how we cooperate to address the new opportunities, fast developing digital technology such as AI and how we minimise the risks of some of those developments. It's about how we solve problems at the global level, how we work together and how we deliver a future that is fairer, more sustainable and better for all of humanity and not just the few who benefit these days from these developments. So this is a big summit with a bigger gender that will mean big changes for us all. And the next few slides I'm just going to ask you all to go to the website and freeze the screen if necessary because there's a lot of detail so I just want to illustrate what they're doing. So this is the summit of the future website to be held 20th to 23rd of September over the Equinox. There's Stephanie very kindly reminded me. It's been presented as a once in a lifetime a generation opportunity to mend trust and there's a lovely picture of a mural there. I thought Ben might like to do a little bit more research in. It's the Eduardo Cobra mural and it's got lots of lots of symbology. So here's the provisional programme and I just ask you to freeze the screen. So here we have Sunday's programme and we can see they're talking about peace and security and here we go not acceleration anymore with turbocharging and they use the word turbocharging all the time turbocharging the 2030 agenda. Here's the Monday provisional programme and you can see the future starts now and common digital future and then I'll just show you some screenshots of the pact for the future which is a declaration and please look out for the pact of the future because that's going to have many more details in it and you can see the actions on the next slide. I've highlighted I'm not going to read them all out but please go and have a look because this is what this is what is heading our way turbocharging again and in an area of peace and security there's a whole chapter designed to that to make us feel safe but they're looking at new forms of conflict and here are the declarations themselves so we've got the future generations declaration. First secondly we've got the draft digital compact declaration which means basically that digitisation will transform the world and of course finally just to end up the UK we are fully in support of it multilateralism and we're really looking forward to the summit of the future and so anybody that wants to read a little bit more about the United Nations I thoroughly recommend Joan Veehan's United Nations Global Straight Jacket. Thank you Debbie thank you very much for that. No Mark let's welcome you to the program and if Debbie's talking about what the United Nations is doing and with their summits there have been other summits taking place as well. Indeed my good day everyone yeah the sovereignty summit to took place this past Monday I was able to cover just part of it so I took some original photos via screenshot this is Frank Gaffney the co-founder of the sovereignty coalition and executive chairman of the Centre for Security Policy and they have a pretty solid outlook in terms of being on the lookout for the avian or bird flu h5n1 whatever is going to become the next pandemic they're getting out all the legal guns they can all the intellectual arguments they can trying to reinforce US sovereignty for the next pandemic so they seem to be very proactive which is reassuring to a point and here we show representative Ralph Norm and a congressman a republic on out of South Carolina and the part I covered mainly had to do with a bill that's languishing a bit House resolution 1425 would authorize the US Senate to treat both the who pandemic treaty and the associated international health regulations both as treaties the problem thus far is that the bill has been dormant parked in the House for an affairs committee but it does have 59 co-sponsors which is somewhat helpful the way congress operates and we'll go on from there I wrote some news briefs from this event the bill is called the No Who Pandemic Preparedness Treaty without Senate approval act a bit wordy but there it is according to the Library of Congress which is congress.gov it quote establishes that any conventional agreement on pandemic related issues reached by the whose world health assembly pursuant to a specified negotiating body shall be deemed to be a treaty requiring the advice and consent of the Senate constitutionally that means a two-thirds super majority of those present that's a caveat would be needed in the Senate to approve US entry into such WHO treaties and we can keep moving another more a little bit more text from my news brief representative Norman and the sovereignty senators mr. Gaffney agreed that such a measure should be pursued to secure the principle that the US must not fail to exercise its sovereign treaty powers via the Senate less the nation become mired in nude raconian health edicts the blind size the citizenry in the same way that the citizenry don't we all remember it was blindsided by fear infused COVID-19 edicts back in 2020 of course that kind of traipsed into 2021 a bit and uh there's more points of interest here as we go along I may not read all of this but I got this right out of the text of hr 1425 via congress.gov the Library of Congress um maybe some of us have forgotten this back on May 18th of 2020 then President Trump sent a letter to the WHO uh senate to tade rose the director general there and he made a couple of points the US contributions to the WHO would be halted due to the WHO's mismanagement of the COVID-19 outbreak and the lack of independence from the people's republic of china that is the WHO's lack of independence and B the US would evidently or as supposedly withdraw from the WHO if the WHO did not commit to substantive improvements within 30 days uh there was another point there President Trump's May 18 letter cited numerous instances of WHO mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic and that included uh repeated grossly inaccurate or misleading claims about the transmissibility of the virus and about the government of china's alleged handling of the outbreak of course that's a little bit of a nebulous part of this but that's right in the bill so it's a pretty detailed bill that gets into some pretty controversial points and we'll continue from there and this is another aspect that i was able to cover that past monday um another aspect of it is uh came from matt staver the liberty council and he spoke as a separate organization that uh operates a lot or participates a lot with the sovereign decoalition of the liberty council and he talked about a loss to the south bay pentacostle church versus newsm and an associated suit was harbors rock church versus newsm newsm being gavin newsm the governor of california and mr staver talked about the decision date he went back a little in history a little bit february 5th 2021 and the deciding court was the us supreme court for months california permitted how they would film studios and large retailers to open their doors but the golden state cracked down and harbors or excuse me house of worship uh preventing them from opening their doors to even a single worshiper recognizing this unequal treatment south bay united pentacostle church and harbors rock church sued california asking that religious worship be treated at least as well as these secular activities and there was a comparable case involving a roman catholic diocese versus um homo so um in this aspect of the sovereign decoalition program mic uh they're talking about uh the liberty council being among the organizations that would be very vigilant and uh battling any further attempts if there's another pandemic declaration to shut down on houses of worship so all in all the part that i saw um seemed to be uh an indication that there's some pretty vigilant voices out there that are waiting in the wings for any move by taedros and the w-h-o as they solidify the uh pandemic treaty and put whatever but whatever final touches they might do in the international health regulations very vigilant toward any new pandemic and what that crackdown may consist of so um they'll be i'm trying to get a hold of the video from that program so i can watch more of the participants including the well-known doctor peter mccala and next week i presume i'll have a little bit more on this to see how that overall event rounded out and what they have in store in terms of uh preventing the worst effects of another pandemic should it be declared yeah okay thank you very much mark uh right if you like what the uk column does you would like to support us uh then uh please have a look at support dot uk column dot org uh there are options to help us there uh we do need your support for five or a month if you want to be a member of course that gives you access to uh uh uk column news extra which will we we will be on straight after this news program um if you uh would like to share our material we would very much appreciate that as well of course uh we are increasingly censored um and uh you can act as our uh as the algorithm for us so uk column dot org and uk column extract so the place to go for that uh you can pick something up at the uk column shop uh and uh thank you very much again to everybody uh that is either a member or has picked up a copy of your life in their hands uh still uh copies available if you would like to get hold of one if you haven't got a jet please do so uh demi your blog will be up this afternoon what do we get to look forward to this week well you get my observations on Paris 2024 opening ceremony uh maybe there's some things in there that perhaps you haven't noticed and who's heard of sippery stock home international peace research institute uh perhaps maybe a new segment coming up on that and also uh yeah dementia case is expected to almost triple across the world by 2050 i wonder why that could be so that and plenty more okay thank you uh a reminder of the gutsy women interview the between brine and the Natasha McCallum that's on the website it went out at 1 p.m yesterday of course but it is up on the website now so if you haven't seen that yet do have a look this was uh looking at the inside of frenethy house and uh everybody should be aware of that particular campaign that's ongoing at the moment to get the women that were apparently abused in uh frenethy house some justice uh finally uh now i just mentioned the October of 19th of October 2024 the tickets are on sale now at at the uk column shop uh we hope to see as many of you there as possible uh please uh pick up your ticket there on sale at an early bird price at the moment please uh have a look and decide if you want to come we look forward to meeting everybody that's there now uh let's have a look at uh the war situation at the moment and uh well you'd be impressed to know that uh ukraine has taken delivery of first if it's first f-16s allegedly lots of mainstream media talking about this at the moment uh but uh mostly relying on unnamed sources uh we're not clear at this point whether any of them will actually take to the air uh while they're in ukraine airspace or who will be piloting them in fact because of course ukraineans don't have anybody that can fly them at this stage and won't have for quite some time but in the meantime uh this article uh this is an opinion pacing in New York times only a strong US node israel will stop war 11 and in fact the print version of this um uses the word total so will stop total war in leaven and in fact total regional wars what this is talking about so if we just have a look at what they're saying here uh if israel goes further and launches a major operation to uproot hasbola uh which right-wing members of prime minister netanyahu's government have been urging it would be devastating and they're talking about economic collapse humanitarian crisis uh and the uh increasing likelihood of attacks uh in Syria in Iraq the Yemen and so on so the broadening of the conflict uh none of this is in the united states interest says this uh op-ed uh while making clear that it would continue to defend israel against direct attacks by a run uh hasbola's patron Washington needs to make clear to israel that it will not sanction such a war or facilitate it by supplying munitions uh joining the israeli military and attacks against hasbola or providing diplomatic cover for the deaths of civilians so if that is the position of the opinion piece in the uh new york times uh that the the US should be absolutely pushing against israel on this i wonder what the opinion of the uh new or the potential new uh vice president is because uh mark was talking about uh jadeef ans last week let's just have a listen to this this is from uh the kato institute a couple of months ago uh when he was speaking uh there's there's another reason actually motivated by my view that america can't do everything uh we've sort of asked ourselves what do we want out of our israeli allies and more importantly what do we want out of all of our allies writ large do we want clients who depend on us who can't do anything without us or do we want real allies who can actually advance their interests so my biggest criticism of our approaching ukraine uh is that it has no strategic end in sight and it's not leading anywhere that's going to ultimately be good for our country we are subsidizing the europeans to do nothing the europeans are not carrying their fair share of the burden especially when it comes in provision of weapons and their own in their deindustrializing their own country at the same time that they say that putin must be defeated at all costs but i actually think that washington at least current washington leadership really likes the fact that the europeans are completely dependent on us that's not an alliance these people aren't increasingly allies they are client states of the united states of america who do whatever we want them to do well i think we have a real opportunity to ensure that israel is an ally in the true sense that it's going to pursue their interests and sometimes those interests won't totally overlap with the united states and that's totally reasonable but they're fundamentally self-sufficient and i think the way that we get there in israel is actually by combining the abraham accords approach with the defeat of a mas that gets us to a place where israel and the sunni nations can play a regional counterweight to a ran again we don't want a broader regional war we don't want to get involved in a broader regional war the best way to do that is to ensure that israel with the sunni nations can actually police their own region of the world and that allows us to spend less time and less resources on the middle east and focus more on east Asia and the same way that we want our own allies to do the job in europe so that we can focus on east Asia i think that the same is true of the sunni nations in israel in the middle east we want to focus more on east Asia so that should be absolutely clear to everybody and actually this narrative is pretty much what trump was pushing while he was president if you remember him attending the new the inauguration of the new nitto headquarters in brussels in 2018 or so and he was talking about the fact that uh that europe was not paying its way and so on but so what JD vance is saying there very very clearly is uh that the united states wants europe to deal with potent once israel to deal with a rand so that it can deal with china uh so you know they're very he was very clear there that they he wasn't saying that they didn't want a regional war in the middle east he was saying they don't want to be involved in the regional war in the in the middle east because they want to focus on on israel right so i think that is pretty clear what he's saying this is what the trump presidency should he become president is going to represent mark very briefly i don't know if you've got any thoughts on that yeah briefly mike um i like what i hear for the most part i'm hearing a increasingly non interventionist what used to be um insulted as a isolationist stance but a non interventionist stance at least to a reasonable degree and i like his distinction between client and an ally a real ally can stand on their own two feet um love a meridem but a client or less than that is an overly dependent um other nation that is uh going to go the wrong way and then increasingly lean on the us taxpayers so compared to past administrations mr. vance is sounding pretty promising on a scale the one to five with the five being pretty good i give them at least a three and a half maybe a four at this point right well we can talk about this more in extra but i'm going to say i completely disagree with you all not but we'll talk about more more and not an extra uh in the meantime uh what's going on in russia or with russia and africa oh yes the uh the valday discussion club uh they don't get a lot of press i don't know in terms of the alternative media i don't know mike if uh uk column over a longer period i've been on board most recently about two years i don't know if you've given much to the valday discussion club but um this is sort of an overview kind of a straightforward report for today um the russia africa cooperation outlook and objectives uh they've had a lot of meetings lately uh most recently in latter july and uh it has to do with bricks bricks is involved in this we'll move on and just kind of do an overview of what's been going on another news brief i wrote for today's report the ten bricks nations political and business affairs bricks calls itself an intergovernmental organization and includes brazil russia china uh iran and saudi arabia are often worked out at the valday discussion club a masqueral based think tank and discussion forum frequented by russian president Vladimir Putin on march 18th of this year the valday club hosted an expert discussion dedicated to the financial settlements of the bricks countries but then the club went out to hold a major conference the first one on african soil in ten zinea on july 24 this year that events development was significantly influenced by the expansion of bricks this year which in addition to south africa added also egypt and etheopia thus key african countries are receiving additional representation in the brick structure that determines what are called quote the general principles of the countries of the global non-west and south regarding world politics and economics as organizers of the july 24th have been explained adding that the conference considered the following topics and we have a few bullet points economic cooperation between russia and african countries and their shared values i'm not sure exactly what those values are at this point the role of media in their promotion and cultural cooperation i would wonder which media and in what way the approaches of the participating countries quote to the problem of climate change in connection with the social agenda and it's not altogether clear what their view is on climate change is it markedly different than the u.s. led unipolar world and tasks for combating world poverty and inequality i'd like to think that would include serious monetary reform but we don't know yet and this is the ambassador of russia to ten zinea mr. andrei a vete shion vete shion i'm kind of maybe a neat aliex here this is what he had to say global politics the economy and technological competition will never be the same as before more countries are striving to strengthen their sovereignty their self-sufficiency national and cultural identity the countries of the global south and east are gaining prominence and i believe we have one more quote from this gentleman this new political and economic reality now serve as the foundation for the emerging multi-polar and multilateral world order and this is an inevitable process he claims it reflects the cultural and civilizational diversity that is inherently part of humanity despite all attempts at artificial unification so he's implying that what the west does through his global governance efforts is in some way artificial perhaps he's correct on that and this is an associated report by the valeday discussion club russia africa cooperation outlook and objectives and just some of the contents readers can get into the screens there to the screen there and freeze that to see the contents and this is part of those contents i highlighted a key part i'll read the top paragraph only half russia africa relations have become more substantive and regular over the past year with development strategies plans road maps and summit meetings that have become regular despite the challenges and plans for annual russia africa ministerial conferences and then the highlighted part a system of russian african relations is gradually taking shape from chaos dissonance and competing initiatives political signals are increasingly often complemented with practical efforts of various spheres however there is still room for a closer alignment of russia's political and economic interests in the region considering that political dialogue with some countries is developing more actively than economic cooperation is so some of us a little dry that they're obviously trying to make a pretty big stride forward here mic in their version of a world order that is more multi-polar they claim the us part the us led part is of course of unipolar and artificial it is prone to a lot of manipulation some might argue that this is just another dialectic to kind of merge east and west together and it will bring just another form of global governance that will find that we'll find just as equally objectionable as we find the western led version i don't know that it's a deceptive thing like that that's an argument i've heard but that's the latest there'll be more from from this group as i sort this out and probably get into that report a little more perhaps next week or the week after so with that i think we're good for for for today for now okay thank you mark thanks for that Debbie let's come back to you then and back on the topic of health and world health yes but before i before i talk about world health i just want to add that the mhra have put the may and july board meeting on youtube please everybody go and click on it because we really need them to know that we're watching and it would appear that dainty and is still there but um we'll hold off on that for now but yeah back to future health and you know it's all about the future the future of britain toni blare the future health that the summit of the future and um we're looking at october and i'm going into october and i'm seeing what's going on where we've got ricks to start off with the ricks summit which i said was going to be chaired by russia so that's on uh the 22nd to 24th of october but just before then because i do think these eight weeks between september and the end of november are going to be pivotal and they're going to we're going to start seeing a tightening of screws on us so the world health summit 13th 15th of october in belin meant to be building trust for a healthier world and we've got a huge 350 speakers and i'll show you some of those in a minute 3000 participants over 60 sessions and they're going to be looking at women's health antimicrobial resistance health around climate shocks which pretty much includes everything including vaccines digital health of course artificial intelligence and again youth leaders of the future um and just to take you to the website for their future health so you can see where to go this is the main front page of the website building trust for a healthier world but if we go to look at their mission we can see that again this they call this a unique a platform for global health i think that's on the next slide yeah this is a unique platform where stakeholders um politicians scientists the private sector um and civil society can all meet to talk about the sustainable development goals um and this is they say political decisions will affect human health and quite clearly they are they are wanting to accelerate everything but if we look at the central topics the central topics are again we say antimicrobial resistance artificial intelligence the youth again young people women's health climate and how climate will affect health and i just want you to see their program because they brought out a draft program and this is only just been published so um you can freeze the screen again uh because there's so much on that you might want to choose a particular session to go and watch because i do think that this is going to be a tool so this is for October and just freeze the screen so you can see the agenda and then we've also got the 14th and the 15th so you can see the agendas for both of those days and who's running it well we've got a gentleman called Axel Prius who's the World Health Summit President and i'm just going to highlight a number of the members not so much by name but by organization so we've got the United Nations participating the Red Cross Google Health welcome the WHO of course Bill and Melinda Gates as well um at the usual suspects and what about their partners well you won't be surprised to see Bill and Melinda Gates or Pfizer, Sepi, the European Commission and Siemens the major partners premier partners we've got the Rockefeller Foundation we've got Bayer Johnson and Johnson i mean it really is a feast for your eyes of all of the names that you're used to supporting partners there you go you've got the global fund i mean it's extraordinarily big event and it's going to be taking place as i say in October but let's look at some of the speakers because they have got they've got so many speakers so of course we've got Tedros from the WHO um we've also got the ambassador on antimicrobial resistance for a federal ministry of health Germany and also the CEO of the Union of International Cancer Control so these are the three big agendas here that um the WHO are going to be looking at but let's look at a few more of the speakers and i'm just going to just highlight just a few because there really are so many so we're looking at speakers from Google deep mind and there we see Dame Sally Davis of course she's our very own UK envoy for antimicrobial resistance we've got unades we've got the max plank we've got bill gates i mean that the names go on and if we go on to the next slide you'll see some more familiar faces Jeremy Farrah who's the chief scientist for the WHO Richard Horton editor of the Lancet we've got YouTube being represented and we've got epidemic preparedness being represented and even more on the next slide we've got Gabby we've got welcome we've got the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Pfizer the Rockefellers the lists just go on and on a big big summit but i mean let's look um at the next slide because we're looking at the United Nations political declaration now this is the one that i've been talking about this is one of the days where purely antimicrobial resistance is going to be talked about and this is why i say this is going to be a bigger gender moving forward so what they're saying is that it contributes to five million deaths a year including many children the financial costs are extreme at one trillion US dollars for additional health care but they say that treating antibiotic resistance infection could cost a staggering eye-watering 412 billion pounds a year and with loss of productivity of 443 million billion dollars a year so i mean they're putting big figures on this and as i've said all along antimicrobial resistance um how real is this agenda probably in my opinion about as real as climate change and all of the sustainable goals that appear unsustainable so here's the big banner for antimicrobial resistance AMR is invisible i am not um well it's going to be a big day and i predict big changes but let's go on to November because i did say the eight weeks we're going to be busy and i'm just going to flush up a couple of big big dates for your diary the UN climate change in November the conference in Baku uh 11th to the 22nd of November 2024 and then we've got the g20 as well in Rio that's on November the 18th to the 19th that's going to be another huge summit and of course in December we just round it all off with epidemic preparedness day so as far as i can see from what i'm what i'm looking at online it would appear that the weeks between the end of september to the end of november are going to be extremely busy there are going to be a lot of major decisions made that could affect us very very quickly and like i say we're going from the word acceleration to turbocharged so keep an eye when we all get back from holiday and the kids go back to school i think we're going to see a lot of changes very quickly okay Debbie thank you very much uh well we're just going to finish with farming and uh well the government pushing this out this morning is from defra we're introducing a new deal for farmers so they've announced it's their commitment to introduce a new deal for farmers to address low confidence and and provide stability to the farming sector uh so this is what they have to say optimizing environmental land management schemes so that they can produce the right outcomes for all farmers including those who've been too often ignored such as small grassland upland and tenant farmers while delivering food security and nature recovery in a just an equitable way so they're claiming to maintain food security and my question is are they going to do any such thing my harry met kathas is a farmer in the uk who has a youtube channel called harry's farm and he released a video yesterday commenting on the issue of environmental land management and food security let's have a listen to this we have a consumption of old seed rape in the uk of around 1.8 million tons they think the 24 harvest is going to be about 900 tons you don't have to go back you go back to 2012 we were exporting 700 000 tons and we're growing 2.0 million tons of 24 were down to 900 000 tons and just going on a perception and chatter amongst farmers that might go down to 600 000 tons and it's just decimated the tonnage of obviously rate being grown in this country food if you like and with all these environmental things happening as well the wheat tonnage is going down there's there's I don't know what's going to happen in harvest 25 when reality hits when the actual amount of food produced in this country has dropped so dramatically we're not talking about 10% we're talking about half the amount and we're huge numbers and I notice there's also stock numbers in on the upland farms the reports just being published they're massively down with so they dropped 600 000 in thousand head of sheep this year just in one year alone don't know I'm sure the government know what they're doing with all these schemes but it's having a dramatic effect on the amount of food we grow in this country I'm sure the government knows exactly what it's doing I think he's right about that but perhaps not in the way that he means the government absolutely knows what it's doing the government absolutely understands that the UK is a country that already imports 60% of its food and it's Harry MacCalf there making the point where no longer exporting certain types of produce because we're not producing enough of it as these land management schemes continue to develop and you remember I appreciate Debbie's point about change but Starmor talking about change in fact he isn't he's just accelerating the change which was already in progress and with respect to farming that change was the taking of land out of production for food and turning it back into so-called environmental schemes this is extremely dangerous and if we think we began the program by talking about the pressure that people have been under as a result of immigration and the fact that's not just immigration but also the collapse of infrastructure as people have been taking money out of the system hands out of our fist this is going to increase pressure even further because inevitably with shortages prices are going to go up again on a long-term basis now Harry talking about 2025 harvest being when the you know when things sort of become apparent to people we've been warning about this for how many years now this has been coming so nobody should be surprised hopefully we could be reversed but the food production scenario in this country is Debbie I would say absolutely insane I don't know if you've got any thoughts well I mean I just go back to be honest Mike you know we hear all the time about the sustainable development goals and clearly this is to make everything unsustainable we are not a sustainable country and they are deliberately dismantling us they are deliberately destroying disrupting in order to create carnage so that we are completely unsustainable so their sustainable goal is unsustainability or am I am I getting it wrong that's just the way I see it everything is inverted everything is turned upside down and with all the land being reclaimed for solar farms and wind turbines wind farms as well it's clear what the agenda is and that is to destroy any sustainability that this country ever had absolutely I've found it interesting and slightly amusing to use the word carnage of course because Mark Carnie is is a key figure that's behind all this when we're talking about they we're not just talking about the British government we're also talking about people that have worked within the British government better in other roles now but we're talking about sort of multi-national organizations like the World Economic Forum the United Nations and so on so there are many players in this game and we'll be talking more and more about them in the coming days and weeks well look we've got to leave it there for today so I'm going to say thank you very much to Debbie and Mark for joining us thank you all for watching and if you're a UK-Cole member stick around on the live stream and we'll be back in a few minutes for some extra otherwise have a great weekend I won't see you for until for another two weeks but the news will continue as usual see you Monday bye bye