HITLER A ROTHSCHILD AGENT? (No way) - ADOLF HITLER - THE LAST GREAT WHITE MAN (WW2 NSDAP) HD

Video Transcript:

Every few weeks or so, a reader will ask for comment on the persistent false allegation of Adolf Hitler having been a secret agent of the Roth's child bankers. Dismissing the claims as retarded rubbish with a few sentences of clarification is generally all it takes to reassure Hitler fans that there is no cause for alarm. All one has to do is look at the level of never-ending Red Hot hatred that is still being leveled Hitler. Seventy years after Germany's defeat in World War II, he continues to be vilified by the PRC, the predatory ruling class, for one simple reason to scare people into a never-do that again frame of mind. The great one was true blue, the real deal, the genuine article. One termy to the Ivoidic claims a patriot taunts and assorted trolls who are known to pose as anti-globalists. Hitler shut down the German, French and Austrian branches of the House of Roth's child, a very peculiar action for a Roth's child agent, don't you think? This unsourced nonsense about Hitler the British Roth's child agent doesn't even merit the time that it takes to rebut it. That because more than a few troopers have bought into this lunacy and continue to repeat this lie, promoted by advertising salesmen such as Alex Jones, among others. What follows is a put up or shut up reputation of the major points of the Hitler worked for the Roth's child's fairy tale and its lesser variant the Roth's child's funded and manipulated Hitler. Hitler tried to make deals with the British. He should have known that England would ally itself with Russia rather than against it. This proves that Hitler was a Roth's child agent in fault opposition. Rebuttal The English ruling class was not monolithic. Hitler's outreach was to the reasonable elements, not to scum such as Winston Churchill and Anthony Dyn. There were powerful men in Britain that were resisting the drive to World War II with Germany. Men such as former Prime Minister David Lloyd George, King Edward ate later to Modo Taduk because he was an open admirer of Hitler. The fifth Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wells' late Lord Halda Fax, and even Prime Minister Navril Chamberlain, the appeaser who was maneuvered into war by the traitors in his own party. It was those type of English man that Hitler was trying to forge an alliance with, not the Roth's child Jews and their Freemason Stooges. Claim Hitler attacked a subsidiary of the New World Order the USSR instead of its heart, the City of London. This proves that Hitler was a Roth's child agent in fault opposition. The reason Hitler did not invade England was because he held out hopes for making peace. When Stalin provoked Hitler's preemptive invasion Russia in 1941, the invasion of England was then out of the question, logistically speaking. Hitler's hesitation to invade Britain had nothing to do with protecting the Roth's child's. Claim Hitler failed to see that America had already succumbed to total Roth's child control. He should therefore have known that America would enter the war and not break men out before the Americans could arrive. Rebuttal Like Britain, America's political class was not monolithic. The anti-war, anti-FDR forces in America were still very strong. Hitler demanded among them were men like Charles Lindbergh and Joseph P. Kennedy. Claim Hitler was financed by the same London and New York city-based Masonic Jewish bankers he was railing against. Rebuttal Can anyone show us a receipt? Seriously, there is not one shred of evidence that the Roth's child's or their front men financed the rise of Hitler's NSTAP. Hitler's money came from German businessmen fearful of communist takeover, Russian emigres slash royalists who fled the Bolsheviks and regular party members, disgruntled veterans and NSTAP supporters. Claim Companies like Ford, Woolworth, Kojdak, Alko and IBM. Wall Street investors like press-con bush did business with Nazi Germany. Rebuttal So what? Many American firms and individuals did business with Germany after it became a United Constitutional Monarchy and continued to do business with Germany when it became a left-leaning socialist democracy and continued to do business with pre-war Germany after Hitler and his NSTAP were elected into power. Why wouldn't they? If a local cigar shop imports and resells Cuban cigars, does that make the owner a Castro collaborator or a communist? Claim Jewish banking legends Paul and Max Warburg supported Hitler's NSTAP through a large chemical company called IG Farben and its American subsidiary. IG Farben helped finance the NSTAP while Max served on its board and Paul served on the board of its American subsidiary. Rebuttal Means nothing. The Warburgs were neither CEOs nor presidents at IG Farben. But only single board members out of many others. The origination of their terms on various corporate boards preceded Hitler's rise. Paul actually died one year before Hitler was even elected. We should also point out that many German firms that did not have a warburg sitting on their board also supported Hitler. In short, IG Farben backed Hitler in spite of the warburgs, not because of them. Claim In such and such a book, Professor So-and-Soft from such and such university reveals that Hitler Blar Blar Blar Rebuttal With the easily impressed, junk historians citing the unsourced garbage of other junk historians may sound like a statement of credibility. But it is not. Fools quoting fools in an endless circle jerk proves nothing. At some point, one needs to produce original source documentation or multiple credible witness in order to support an accusation. We do not see any of that in any of the articles claiming that Hitler was an agent of the bankers. Claim Hitler's role was to smoke out all opposition to the new world order and lead it to destruction. Rebuttal Apart from there being no evidence to support this horrible hypothesis, this opinion itself is nonsensible. If the deliverance of Germany into the hands of satanic world government was truly Hitler's goal, then all he had to do was allow the failed Y-MAR Republic to continue imploding. Had Germany fallen to Bolshevism in the early 1930s, which it certainly would have or had not for Hitler's dynamic leadership, it would have been game over for all of Europe. Claim In May, June 1940, when England lay prostrate after their exodus from Dunkirk. Hitler had an opportunity to tear out the heart of the globalist Jewish money monopoly. Instead he allowed 330,000 British and allied soldiers to escape at Dunkirk, proof that he was their agent, not their nemesis. Rebuttal If you'd threw the lenses of 2020 at sign site, Hitler's mercy at Dunkirk was a blunder. But to go from there, all the way to Hitler was a Rothschild agent as the equivalent of taking two and two and hastily coming up with five. What devotees of the Rothschild Hitler School of Illogic may not know is that after Dunkirk, May 1940, there was a bitter divide among members of Churchill's war cabinet. The faction led by Lord Halle Fax was willing to sit down with Mussolini of Italy who was still neutral and hear the details of a piece offered from Germany. The conflict is known as the war cabinet crisis and it almost ended Churchill's war before it could really heat up. It was the presence of reasonable Englishmen such as Halle Fax, coupled with Hitler's sincere desire to avoid further bloodshed, that stayed Hitler's hand. That's called honor, not treason. Why the lie? Given that the moronic myth of Hitler Rothschild is so devoid of logic, so utterly unsubstantiated, and so easily debunked, one has to wonder why such claims continue to be peddled by some in the truth movement. There are three categories of people promoting this rubbish. One, fault-opposition slash Zionist trolls. Two, Hitler phobics. Three, sincere dupes of categories one and two. The fault-opposition explanation for the Hitler Rothschild lie is self-explanatory. There are those usual suspects, who, in an attempt to steer truth seeking conspiracy theorists away from the greatness and goodness of Hitler, would have us believe that Hitler was a traitor working for the NWO slashe Illuminati. They are deliberately poisoning the well of truth. Is that simple? The Hitler phobia phenomena, on the other hand, is not the work of fault-opposition agents. Rather, it is motivated by the fear of going all the way by embracing the undeservedly toxic name of the evil aid off Hitler. He is weak-willed and ad-revenue-dependent true-fers will passionately and sincerely rail against the globalists and their evil agent FDR, and the evil communist Joseph Stalin. But they need to come up with a plausible sounding explanation for Hitler's fight against the very same globalists that they hate so much. You see, they cannot say that the globalists were suddenly the good guys during World War II but nor can they bring themselves to admit that Hitler was the good guy fighting globalism either. Parish the thought. It's quite a pick up for these timid types. They Hitler wasn't bad with the globalist fairy tale solves this little problem. As the manufactured argument goes, the globalists and Hitler were both bad guys who dumber crossed each other. It's a very safe middle ground for the one-half truth movement, but it's a lie-era that 100% truth-versed should be aware of, and stay far away from.