7/7 Ripple Effect 3 - London Tube Bombings

Video Transcript:

An updated and expanded message from Mordib about the 7th of July 2005. Dear viewer, I hope this finds you well, ingot spirit and having a good day. Regarding the 772000 of five terrorist attacks in London, let us look at the facts and see what we were told and compare them. Then, using Occam's razor and common sense, let us see what conclusions are to be drawn, so we can all understand what most likely really did happen that day. First chapter, title, mock exercises and bum holeks in the run-up to 772000 and five. More than a year before the 772000 of five attacks on the 16th of May 2004, an edition of the BBC One Panorama program, broadcasted a mock exercise, imagining what would happen if a terrorist attack was executed in London in the near future, consisting of three explosions on tube trains in the London Underground and one explosion on a road vehicle. The following excerpt from the BBC program gives us a good idea of why this program was made. If there are now bombs going off above ground, in this case a lorry being attacked, it could happen anywhere. The potential for mass panic across not just the capital, but the whole country is very much with us. I think, therefore, we need to look at more serious measures. We do have reserve powers in effect to take over the BBC if we were to wish to and to get them to broadcast. Whatever we wanted them to broadcast, those powers are there in the Broadcasting Act. My advice to the Prime Minister would be not to use those, but I think we should be talking to the broadcasters about having the Prime Minister on the very quickly. Does it remember that Michael? No, I entirely agree that the Prime Minister should be out there. And we shouldn't be using the powers to bring in the BBC, but we should certainly be talking to the broadcasters about the way in which the coverage is going to be organised. Please note well that he said the coverage is going to be organised. In other words, he was saying that they would write the script for and then edit and control the media coverage of an event in which there were three explosions on London tube trains and one on a road vehicle, if such an event were to take place in the near future. The question that begs to be asked is this. Was that what they were actually in the process of planning and precisely the reason for that programme? This is the kind of terrorist attack the government repeatedly says is going to happen. We've been absolutely clear, we can't guarantee that there will never be an attack. It's quite likely that they're planning one now. I am wondering about the purpose and effect of this very programme. This BBC Panorama programme appears to have been used by those behind the 77 2005 attack, as the means by which the media's response to the attack in the near future was studied, so it could be controlled and directed towards their own ends. Mr Price plays the bad cop and issues the threat of taking over control of the BBC, and then Mr Portillo plays the good cop and says that there is no need to do that, as long as the BBC behaves itself and broadcasts whatever they want them to. The good cop bad cop scenario is just theatre to deceive the viewer. The reality is that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and is already and always has been controlled and used by the government. The headlines at 9 o'clock in the past hour there have been three major explosions on the London Underground. The first occurred at 10 past 8 on the Piggardini line between Night's Bridge and Hyde Park Corner. The second at 16 minutes past 8 on the central line between Toppen Court Road and Oxford Circus. And the third at 27 minutes past 8 as a train was arriving at the Vox salt station in Stockwell on the big train line. Emergency services have been pulled to all three scenes. There are no reports available yet on the number of casualties, and the police have said that it's too early to identify a possible cause. London Underground is now closed and the police are asking people not to travel. 350,000 people alone are making their way towards a city of London at this point. And if the access overload system has been triggered and they can't get onto the low-bytelephones, this will have profound indications for them the next of kin. We can now confirm that a tanker carrying chlorine has exploded at the junction of Shoreditch High Street and Commercial Street. Chlorine is extremely toxic in this form and the police are issuing express warnings to people to stay indoors, close windows and remain there and turn for all clear as people. In the days leading up to 77 2005, there were hopes, bombscares, in nuttingham and Sheffield. There will be more about Sheffield and South Yorkshire police whose headquarters are in Sheffield later in this video. Were these false alarm hopes meant not only to cause panic and confusion, but also to low everyone into a false sense of security and into thinking that the initial reports in London on 77 2005 would also be false alarm hopes so people would ignore them until it was too late. Second chapter title, Peter Power, Guilpe or Accomplice. Then, on 77 2005, we were told on TV by Peter Power of Viser Consultants that they and the private company employing them who helped choose the scenario for it were running a mock terrorist drill in the London Underground, with practically the same scenario as what actually really happened on that day. In other words, the actual mock anti-terror drill that the BBC panorama programme of May 2004 had outlined had been chosen by Viser's client to be carried out on the very same day that former Muslim suicide bombers also chose the same scenarios that Viser's client had chosen for the mock drill, causing real and devastating explosions. On three London tube trains and one road view, please think about that unbelievable set of coincidences for a few seconds to let the implications of it sink in. Then please ask yourself, what are the odds against all of that happening by chance? Just to get this right, you are actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario. Almost precisely, I was at 12 o'clock this morning because it's our job, my own company, Viser Consultants, we specialise in helping people to get their crisis management response, how do you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing? We chose a scenario with their assistance, which is based on a terrorist attack because they are very close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen, they are in a city and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York, a logical thing to do. How extraordinary today must feel for you as it unfolds? In his TV video clip, Peter Power states that their customer helped to choose the exact scenario. I repeat, Viser's customer helped to choose the exact scenario. To this day, Peter Power refuses to publicly identify the customer who chose the exact scenario. Why? Since then, he has claimed that it was for London-based information giant Reed Elsevier, which interestingly has links to the arms trade, the military industrial complex and defence systems and equipment international. A subsidiary spearhead organised defence shows, including an event where it was reported that cluster bombs and extremely powerful riot control equipment were offered for sale. Reed Elsevier's European head office is in Amsterdam and so is the Israeli security company ICTS. I said Peter Power claimed that the company was Reed Elsevier because it doesn't make sense. Why would a publishing company want to run an exercise involving blowing up tube trains? How could that affect a publishing business? Why would a publishing company need to go from slow time thinking to quick time doing just because some tube trains had blown up? It smells fishy and unreal. I for one, along with many others, do not believe or trust him. In the BBC conspiracy file 777, he backtracked and stated that it was entirely office-based involving six people. Whereas initially, he said it was for a company involving a thousand people. And we sat everybody down in the city, a thousand people involved in the whole organisation, but the crisis team. We know from other sources that there was at least one lie drill being carried out that day, involving lots of people, including policemen. DCI Steve Williams of South Yorkshire Police all the way from Sheffield was there, in London, taking part in a training drill that day. It has also been observed that on Luton station Car Park CCTV video footage, both on the day of the practice run, the 28th of June and later on 777, there was a dark coloured Jaguar present in the Luton station Car Park that appears to have been the car of their handler. Did the Jaguars driver provide them with the backpacks? Who was driving that Jaguar? Third chapter title, Foreign Security Firms. Can they be trusted? Varynt systems is the security firm that is responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras in the London Underground Rail Network. And it is an Israeli company with approximately a thousand employees. No CCTV footage of the former Muslims boarding the tube trains has been released by Varynt will claim that their cameras were not working. Why? Because the former Muslims were not on the tube trains that blew up. Fourth chapter title, The Former Muslims, Actors or Patsys. We were also told that the training exercise involved a thousand people and, of course, amongst those one thousand people would have to be the four people who were recruited to play the parts of the mock terrorists. Therefore, as part of the exercise, they would have recruited four young Muslim men to carry four backpacks that were to contain mock explosive devices. Who were their Muslim recruits? These Muslim men would naturally by return train tickets and not one way tickets, because they would be going home after playing their parts in the training exercise. One of them, the oldest, who would be considered the ringleader of the group because of his age, would have been asked to make a suicide video prior to 77 2005. Being told it would form part of the training mock terrorist exercise in order to make the exercise and possibly a film to be made of it, look as realistic as possible. He would obviously not have been told the details of the whole plan until later, probably when he and the others arrived at Luton on the 7th of July 2005, to make absolutely certain that the scenario of the drill, which would take place that day, could not be talked about by or to anyone. The second oldest would also be asked to make a similar video as a backup for just in case anything went wrong and the oldest pulled out of the drill before the 7th of July 2005. Muhammad Siddiqui Khan's wife Haseena, now his widow, was pregnant and had started bleeding on the 5th of July, two days before the bombings took place. There was obviously something wrong with her, so Muhammad Siddiqui Khan took her to hospital in Jusbury. She was examined and booked in for a scan on the 7th, because of a threatened miscarriage. So, in the circumstances, as a loving husband and dad, as he demonstrated in his second video that has been broadcast, he most probably did pull out of the training exercise. After he had taken his wife home, he said he was going to see his friends, and she never saw him again. She miscarried on the 7th of July, the day of the bombings, not knowing what had become of her husband. The petrol attendant at Woodall services on the M1 motorway, where Shazad Tanwiyah stopped for fuel in the Nissan Micra, says he only saw two people in the car. Shazad Tanwiyah and Haseena have seen in the CCTV footage. So, it is quite possible that Muhammad Siddiqui Khan never made the trip to London, but was grabbed in leads and disposed of. Since making 777 Ripple Effect, new things have come to light about Muhammad Siddiqui Khan and Shazad Tanwiyah, and their involvement in Operation Krevis in 2004, during which they were photographed on numerous occasions with the suspects involved in Operation Krevis. However, they were not investigated, whilst the others were not only investigated. Omar Kayyan, Antony Garcia, Wahid Mahmoud, Jawad Akbar and Salahuddin Amin were arrested, charged and convicted of terrorist charges. Among the remaining 40 were two men whose names were to become notorious. Muhammad Siddiqui Khan, the alleged ringleader of the July 7 bombers, and his alleged right hand man, Shazad Tanwiyah. Operation Krevis was an investigation into a group of Muslims who are alleged to have been manufacturing and full bombs, from ammonium nitrate fertilizer and fuel oil in the UK, similar to what Timhthimah were used in his Oklahoma City truck bomb in the USA. Muhammad Siddiqui Khan was recorded meeting Kayyan four times in the final stages of Operation Krevis. On one occasion, he even asked Kayyan, are you a terrorist? How could they do that, unless Kayyan was wired up with a microphone and told to ask that question? Who would ask that question if not told to do so, so that the answer could be recorded and used in evidence? Shazad Tanwiyah also met Kayyan around this time. Operation Krevis wound up in the spring of 2004, just around the time that the BBC Panorama program London Under Attack was being made and broadcast in May. High and others, including Charles Schuberidge, who is a well-known security expert, have suspected for quite some time that Muhammad Siddiqui Khan, codenamed Ibrahim according to Muhammad Junaid Babar, and Shazad Tanwiyah were in fact MI5 assets. And this Operation Krevis evidence is further indication that they were indeed working for MI5. Charles Schuberidge is a writer, broadcaster and independent authority on issues of security, intelligence, terrorism and crime. A graduate of history and politics and of the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, he served for almost two decades until 2000 in diverse frontline policing and military roles, specializing in counterterrorism and intelligence operations. Prior to his service at Scotland Yard and elsewhere with the Metropolitan Police, he also worked in counterterrorism as a commissioned officer in the British Army. He has made numerous TV, radio and newspaper contributions, including as one of the host presenters of the critically acclaimed TV series Crisis Command. Well, with me now in the studio, Charles Schuberidge, former anti-terrorist intelligence officer with the police here in London, is this a big miss by the authorities? Well, I think we've already established actually in the panoply of information that's emerged since the central July tax that suggests that certainly Khan and Siddiqui Khan were known to the security services to varying degrees. That has emerged already, but there's no question that this new information, which I think sounds credible, certainly it's the sort of information that I ask, is given to police quite regularly about the activities of Islamic extremists and others of terrorist interest. We should have added to that picture, and so once again, we're talking about the intelligence game, if you like, of jigsaw, if in effect, putting together all these disparate elements of information to come up with a profile of a person and assess the risk from that person correctly, that isn't what happened in this case. Yes, because we've got what this man says he did, and there's new information just this week from the United States saying that the US tipped off the British authorities about how it's in the Khan anyway, and then there was the original sort of admission, which came quite late from the security services here that they were aware of him and that they've been following in tangential to another investigation. I mean, it does all amount of it seems over time that there was more and more information there. No, that's right, and I don't think again that's a surprise to people who actually worked in the industry, if you like, of intelligence. It was always going to be highly improbable that somebody comes straight out as what the media was calling a clean skin and suddenly becomes a suicide bomber. Well, the media led on by briefings from the authorities. I think that's absolutely right, and there was a good reason for that, I'm sure, which was from their perspective anyway, which was of course, if these are clean skins, how can we blame the security services for not having been on their territory? As it's turned out, as I think was predictable and predicted, this has turned out to be not the case. The really the level of information that was coming in about Khan, particularly if these American reports, especially which now seem to be being backed up by the actual American authorities, not just appearing in an author's book, that they tipped off the British about the specifics of Khan. And this was quite a serious plot in the United States that we were talking about, attempt to blow up synagogues and so on. The amount of information coming in and the quality of information coming in, the fact that that has been so consistently overlooked, it would appear by the Security Service MI5, to me suggests really only one of two options, either A, we've got a level of incompetence that would be unusual even for the security services, but B, possibly, and this is a possibility that his man Khan may even have been working as an informant for the Security Service. It's difficult otherwise to see how it can be that they've so covered his tracks in the interim. Interesting. Thank you very much, though. The only logical explanation from Muhammad Sallikhi Khan, code name Ibrahim, and Shazad Tanwir, not being investigated as part of Operation Krevis, and asking Omar Kiyam if he was a terrorist, so that it could be recorded as evidence, is that they were working for MI5 and were sent to infiltrate the group and report back to M.I. This would give another possible explanation for the origins of the so-called suicide videos of Muhammad Sallikhi Khan and Shazad Tanwir, who are reported to have frequently made visits to Pakistan to allegedly visit terrorist training camps. How did Muhammad Sallikhi Khan do that on a schoolteacher's pay? The most likely explanation now is that they were asked to make those videos by MI5, to give themselves some credibility with extremist Muslims and the terrorist training camps, so that they could more easily infiltrate them for MI5 and MI6, who would be financing them and their trips abroad. The same videos could then have been edited and used by the authorities after the 777 attacks to try to frame them. People in Beaston who knew them said that they looked younger in those videos than they looked in 2005, and that they did not talk like that, and the moment of their lives did not synchronize with what they were supposedly saying in the videos. Survivors and family members of the deceased are quite rightfully asked why MI5 did not arrest Muhammad Sallikhi Khan and Shazad Tanwir as part of Operation Krevis, and thus prevent the 777 attacks from happening and save everyone who was affected by 777 from being murdered, mained, injured, bereaved or traumatized. The only logical answer is that they were British Patriots working for MI5 all along, and then when they had outlived their usefulness and knew enough to be a liability to MI5, especially if their cover was blown by Operation Krevis, they were set up as patsys and eliminated. As a further indication that they were working for MI5, former Justice Department prosecutor and terror expert John Loftus was filmed in an interview talking about Haroon Rashid Aswap, when we were told by the authorities was the mastermind behind the 777 attacks. John Loftus says that Aswap is an MI6 agent. Aswap is believed to be the mastermind of all the bombings in London. From on the 777-21, this is the guy we think. This is the guy and what's really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him and one wing of the British government, MI6, the British Secret Service has been hiding him. Now we knew about this guy Aswap. Back in 1999 he came to America, the Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon. So they indicted Aswap. But why didn't they indict him? Well it comes out we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswap. Hello and a hold on. Why? Well apparently Aswap was working for British intelligence. Now Aswap's boss, the one armed captain hook, he gets indicted two years later. So the guy above him and below him getting indicted but not Aswap. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead. We don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. Yeah now the CIA says he's alive. Always alive. Our CIA says okay let's arrest him but the Brits say no again. The Brits say no. Now at this point two weeks ago the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again. He goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands. He isn't arrested when he leaves. He's not always on a watch list. He's on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man and then takes off the day before the bombing. I understand it and goes to Pakistan. The Pakistan is arrested. They jail him. They jail him. He's released within 24 hours. We were told by the British authorities that the alleged bombers made phone calls to Aswap prior to the explosions. Aswap came into the UK towards the end of June 2005 through the port of Felix Stutt. He left the UK on an early morning flight from Heathrow on the day of 7-7. When the police were doing their investigations into the 7-7 atrocity they came across evidence that Haroon Aswap had made mobile phone calls to the alleged suicide bombers just hours before the attacks. He had made about 20 calls to them. With the suspicious travel movements by Haroon and along with the many mobile phone calls he allegedly made he was designated as prime suspect and mastermind of the 7-7. He was at this point that he was traced to South Africa, Zimbabwe and watched until he tried to cross the border to Zambia. He was arrested. Once in custody in Zambia aswap was then deported to the UK for questioning about 7-7. During this time MI6 then declared that he was an agent of theirs and that Aswap had nothing to do with the 7-7 atrocity and that he will not be interviewed. MI6 basically overrode the police inquiries. All of this information further indicates that 7-7 was a false flag sale carried out by the security services and that it was not carried out by Muslims. It should be noted that neither Muhammad Siddiquit Khan nor Shazad Tanweer specify what their targets were in their videos. It is also interesting to note that no one has ever claimed responsibility for the 7-7 2005 bombings except for a message on a fake al-Qaeda website on the same day that was traced to Texas in the USA. As already stated, if Tanweer and Khan were working for MI5 and MI6 as informants and asked to infiltrate extremist Muslim groups then that would explain the making of these videos to be used as part of their credentials when attempting to gain the trust of extremists. Two years afterwards because more and more people doubt the official story and are proving it to be a wise and deception and are rightfully demanding an independent investigation, the police have arrested, frightened, intimidated and harassed Muhammad Siddiquit Khan's widow into publicly condemning her husband. She has a young daughter to protect and has stated that she is now afraid of the police. They kept her in custody for six days to intimidate her and then showed her what they claim is her husband's will and suicide note. Obviously this was done to get her to condemn her husband publicly in exchange for the authorities implied agreement to leave her alone to which she will have agreed in order to protect herself and her young daughter from further harassment. Where were these documents found and why did it take two years for them to be shown to her? They are, after all, her rightful property, Hithgendran, two years is ample time to forge a short, handwritten note and signature on a will. In view of the amount of time this suicide note has taken to be mentioned, the timing of it and all the lies and evidence the authorities have told, fabricated and planted, it cannot be trusted and must be considered another for you, along with any other new so-called evidence that they might come up with. So the scene is set for the training exercise to go ahead. The fake terrorists have been recruited, the suicide videos have been made and everyone has been given basic instructions for the day that the exercise is to be put into operation, 772005. The four mock terrorist actors were to meet at Luton train station at 0720 am on the 7th of July 2005 and catch the 0740 am trained from Luton to Kings Cross Tenswink station with their pretend bomb backpacks and then split up and catch three tube trains and one bus to pre-arrange destinations. Where the fake explosions were to take place as part of the training exercise, finally the big day arrived. Everyone was ready, everyone was either already where he was meant to be or was heading there. But first let us take a step backwards for a moment to look at the bigger picture and put this mock terror exercise into context with what was happening in Britain at that time. Tony Blair was in big trouble because he had just been sent a very clear message from the British nation via the May 2005 general election in which he was almost bolted out of power. That the British people did not want British troops fighting in George Bush's war of terror in the Middle East. So to be able to keep the British troops fighting in the Middle East, Tony Blair desperately needed something to happen to change the nation's mind. Tony Blair, George Bush, G8 meeting, agenda of addressing world poverty forced on them by alive eight concerts around the world but not for long. Their lucrative evil, folly and very unpopular war on terror, which is really a war of terror, will promptly return to the top of the agenda with four big bans. No time for the poor, they reach a lot more money to make and people to murder. Meredith Hughes, the chief constable of South Yorkshire police, based in Sheffield, was also the head of the Association of Chief Police Officers, ACPO. And he was in charge of the policing of the G8 meeting in Glen Eagles on the 7th of July 2005 and played a leading role in the national response to the 7th of July 2005 London bombings. Leeds, where three of the Muslim actors lived and were recruited and where the oldest, Muhammad Siddiqui Khan was befended by the local police and was regularly called upon by them to help them to sort out gang rivalry problems. Muhammad was also taken on a tour of the House of Commons by a lead MP who befriended him. The perfect Patsy, someone who was made to believe he could trust the authorities and that they would therefore not deceive or harm him. Someone who could in turn recruit two other Muslims for the drill so they could all become famous and make a nice bit of clean and easy extra money and show their patriotism by helping the authorities to protect Britain from terrorism. A fourth Muslim actor who has been recruited, Jameen Lindsay from Ellsbury, will also meet them in Luton. Luton, transport security firm ICTS, another Israeli company, has an office just a mile away from the Luton train station which is suspected to be where the Muslim actors received their final instructions before setting off for the train station. The details are which trains to board, which carried us to get into, where to sit and which busted catch, where to sit on it and at what time. Another interesting thing about the Israeli firm ICTS is that they also handled the security at the airports in America on 9-11. London, Commissioner of Police in Blair, Rudy Giuliani, Mayor of New York on 9-11, Benjamin Netanyahu who said 9-11 was good for Israel, Peter Power and all those taking part in the mock terrorism drill are present in Central London in or around London underground locations where the explosions take place and also Tabis-Tok Square. ICTS also have their UK head office in Tabis-Tok Square right next to where the number 30 bus blew up, but more about that later. The four men were supposed to arrive together on time at Luton station and be caught on CCTV at 07-21-54 am, entering the station, but three of them are not on the same video frames as Haseeb Hasein. So have to be inserted later using computer software, hence the obviously and very badly adopted official single frame time stamped photo that we have been shown from the CCTV outside Luton station. They can't show them moving because it has been faked, that's why they show only one single frame still photo. Why did the authorities have to fake this photo? They would have had to fake it because three of the actors missed the tube trains that they were supposed to catch and which blew up without them being on board. And so there was no video footage from their insistence of them boarding the three tube trains for the authorities to be able to use as false evidence to try to prove to the public that the Muslims were guilty. So they had to doctor and show us the fake photo instead. Hi this is FlashMP and this is FlashMP's guide to July 17 CCTV. I'm going to start off with all the things that are wrong with the Luton image, why this is not proof of anything. Certainly it's not a valuable piece of evidence and would not be a misoubling court. I'm probably start with the most glaring things that are wrong with the Luton image, firstly being Jermaine Lindsay's left leg. There's a lot wrong with this, there's a triangular chunk missing from his left hip and the top of his thigh is very unusual and obviously it's not normal for a human being and especially at the angle as well. You can also see the top of his thigh is obstructing or is in front of the bottom of his jacket and you should get a clear review there to the top line of his thigh clearly, just in front of his jacket and is not underneath like you would expect. Also you can see that there's a lot of merging between the plastic bag that he's holding and is right knee. It's generally very very messy area and it could be because the people who have fabricated this image added and had problems using the original image of Jermaine Lindsay because it's probably composed of a lot of images that were taken on other days, not on July 7. This is why you probably have the problem with the legs because Jermaine Lindsay is obviously holding a plastic bag and they may have only been able to use the upper body part and not being able to use the legs perhaps because the legs weren't walking in the right direction for this image or they didn't have the right resolution or they may have just not looked right and would have looked even more of a hatchage up in this looks. There's a lot of fusion there between his thigh and his right knee between that and the plastic bag. There's also sort of another triangular chunk missing at the bottom where his ankle should be and this again is not normal, it's not normal characteristic for a human being. Okay, then onto the next anomaly which is Man of City Carnes lower left arm or lack of it. Man of City Carnes is the man standing behind Jermaine Lindsay in the white hat. This appears to have a lower left arm in this image. Some people have said that his arms folded across his stomach or somehow bent behind Jermaine Lindsay but as you can see in both those close up images there's no elbow that's visible and if you look behind you'll see the glass wall where the reflection should be or whether that's an authentic reflection is unknown probably unlikely because there's no left arm there. It's unlikely that Man of City Carnes standing there on this day. As you can see there's a glass wall and it comes down behind and what you see is Man of City Carnes left arm come down, stopping what is essentially just a straight line. There's no elbow there at all and what you'll see behind is the glass wall at Luton station and again this is not normal characteristic for a human being and is entirely impossible. Okay, then onto the next anomaly in the Luton image this is the anomaly associated to Haseep Hussain and this is the dodgy reflection. What you see on the left is Haseep Hussain in the foreground and then this is the background of Haseep Hussain on the right and it essentially looks like someone's taken a stamp or taken the image on the left and like a stamp it onto the glass wall behind to make it look like a reflection. Again this is quite a serious anomaly and it's entirely impossible like there's not behave in this way and reflections are not behave in this way. You should see a literally a mirror image of the other side of Haseep Hussain's legs and the right leg should be in front of the left leg in the reflection like this. Okay, then let's move on to the next anomaly in the Luton image. The next anomalies are associated to Haseep Hussain's head somewhere who's on the furthest right in the image in the dark hat. There seems to be some sort of impact on the bus stop here. It's very wobbly, it seems to have been disrupted in some way and that is not present in or is not the same in the dummy run image which is taken from supposedly this way. Supposedly in the same camera at the same angle and as you can see the bus stop is a lot straighter, very solid. It's also important to note in the dummy run image that Mamasite Khan is wearing the same hat that he's wearing in the Luton image. Also it's important to note that in the top right hand corner there's some kind of code perhaps now kind of time and date code but that's missing from the other image supposedly in July 7th. Also this image seems to show less of the bus stop than the other image. The police may not be it has been complicit in the falsifying of the Luton image however it is quite unlikely seeing as it was presented in such a way by the police. Okay, then the next image is of Haseep Hussain. Mr. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. mainstream media reports, they're really not proof of much, and then you report that contains these images in accurate, and that this you need to be addressed. I was also trying to show that the evidence is available, such as the IDs that were found at the scene and the papers that were found at the scene. It's very important if you don't have any CCTV. Of course some people are going to say that DNA was found at the scene and the papers were found at the scene, and surely that's the conclusive proof. It's not impossible to plant DNA at the scene, it's not impossible to plant, it's more fragments of flesh and bone at the scene, it's definitely not difficult to plant IDs, especially as there are anomalies in the way the IDs were found as well. It's not impossible. Why do the images of the three on the right look blurred when compared to Haseba Sain on the left? Is this a cut and paste leg? Why the extremely blurred face? This technique matches exactly what is known as the smear tool in image manipulation software. Muhammad Siddiqui Khan in the White Hat is standing in front of some railings. The top railing partially merges with his face. The middle railing runs behind him showing that he is in front of it and the bottom one runs in front of him. How can this be possible? Try doing this yourself while standing straight up with a backpack on. This bar here going through Khan, you've got this bar going through his heads, okay? And that bar going through his waist. Now I just get down, seeing if you can't see where Khan's head would be, it goes right through his face like that, okay? In the famous picture you've all seen. The top railing is waist high, approximately three feet six inches. Some Muhammad Siddiqui Khan would have had to have been a dwarf for the railing to be at his head height and we know he was not a dwarf. Please note the difference in clarity between the trial run pictures on the 28th of June 2005 and the 7th of July 2005. Please note the difference in the shape of the curve in the two photos. This image has clearly been fabricated, possibly by our intelligence services or police, in order to frame these four patsys. Lots of video experts have analyzed this luteon station photo and all agree that it has been fabricated, which is a criminal offense. The fact that it has been fabricated would have any case brought against the alleged bombers thrown out a court and the fabricator arrested for attempting to pervert the course of justice, which, as I know from my recent experience, carries a maximum life sentence. Remember what Michael Portillo said on the May 2004 BBC panorama program? The coverage is going to be organized. So far they are apparently running according to the training exercise plan and on schedule. Fifth chapter title, the Ghost Trains. Unfortunately for the people who have organized the events, the train that the former sleep actors are supposed to catch, the 0740 AM train to King's Cross Tenslink has been cancelled and the next one too. So they cannot possibly make it in time to catch the two trains that they were supposed to catch as part of the training exercise. The best laid plans of my son men often go awi as the hand of god interferes. In spite of official confirmation that the 0740 AM train was cancelled and the next one too, the Home Office report still contains the lie that the non-existent 0740 AM train was the one that the former Slim's court. The authorities have to keep lying about it in order to continue to try to make the public believe that three of the four Muslim men who border the train from loop into King's Cross arrived in time to catch the three two trains that blew up. In doing so the authorities make it perfectly clear that the truth of what happened that day is of no importance to them. It is obvious from their actions that the only thing that is important to the authorities is to make us believe what they had already planned to make us believe even when the facts prove it to be alive. They even claim to have witnesses on the non-existent train. Who they say saw the alleged bombers on the non-existent train. Since then the government has changed its story claiming that they caught an earlier train and that they have witnesses who also saw them on the earlier train. Really? It is not possible for them to have caught the earlier train because the CCTV footage times makes it impossible for them to have caught it. If they were really carrying homemade very volatile explosives in their heavy backpacks they most certainly would not have been able to risk running to catch a train. The first available train the Muslim actors can catch gets them to King's Cross after the two trains have already left without them. Haseeb Hussein splits off from the other three at King's Cross Tensling station because he still has time to catch the number 30 bus as his part in the Moctera exercise. When the two trains they were supposed to catch are blown up the other three smell a wrap and realize they have been duped and are Muslim patsys who will be blamed for the attacks and everyone knows what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald. The Muslims are not from London. Their homes are many miles away and so they are like fish out of water and have no idea what to do or where to go and hide. They realize that they can't go home and do not know anyone in London or they can trust. The phones are all not working first of all because they were jammed and then shut down by the authorities so they cannot phone anyone to tell them what has happened. What can they do to prevent themselves from being wrongly blamed for the explosions? What would you do in that situation? On one of the early TV news broadcasts that day a newsreader announced that a report has come in that three of the terrorists involved in the bombings had been shot and killed by the anti-terrorist branch of the police at Canary Wharf in the Docklands area of London's East End. It was also broadcast on BBC Radio 5 Live. The announcement was made only once and never repeated for obvious reasons. How could suicide bombers possibly have survived the tube train bombings and then been in the Docklands to be shot? In a New Zealand Herald newspaper article, it says that two people were shot dead outside the HSBC building and in Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper on the one. There is another newspaper report that the police shot a suicide bomber outside the Credit Suisse First Boston Bank which is approximately 1,400 feet or 467 yards away from the HSBC building. Measured door to door. The two buildings are very different in both shape and size and 467 yards apart and thus they are not easily confused in each other. Police were yesterday probing reports a man had been neutralised, outside Canary Wharf. It is believed the man was shot dead by police marksman, outside the Credit Suisse First Boston Bank, South London press. That means that the police shot and killed at least three suicide bombers in Canary Wharf on 77 2005. How could suicide bombers who were supposed to have blown themselves up on the three tube trains have survived and been shot dead at Canary Wharf? If we have at least three of the four suicide bombers shot dead at Canary Wharf and we know they weren't on the tube trains that blew up because the 0740 AM train from Luton to Kings Cross was cancelled that day then we have overwhelming proof that they did not blow the tube trains up and that the blowing up of the three tube trains was an inside job. At the Canary Wharf Dockland site there are media companies for the Muslim Patsys to help to hold their story to and clear their names if they could. And two possible escape routes via air from the nearby London City airport that has flights to 34 destinations in the UK and Europe and if they couldn't fly out there was the possibility of getting a boat across the channel to France. 6th Chapter Title The Number 30 Bus The fourth Muslim backpacker Haseep Hasein who has been blamed for the number 30 bus bombing is reported to have been seen wandering around London going into McDonald's and eating a beef burger. He is reported to have tried unsuccessfully to contact the other three by phone on Houston Road outside Kings Cross at 0855 AM but the phones were not working because they were first of all jammed and then shut down by the authorities. If these young men were truly suicide bombers who were supposed to have blown themselves up why would he be trying to phone dead people? However if they were merely actors playing the part of mock terrorists in a training drill then trying to phone them would make more sense. What happened to him? He was the youngest of the four only 18 years old and described by those who knew him as a gentle jail. Therefore he was possibly the least worldly wise and he was also on his own in a strange city and a long way from home. He might not have realised he was in danger of being framed as a patsy. Believed all the chaos around that part of London was just part of the mock terrorism exercise that he was part of and so just continued with his assigned role which was to board a certain double-decker bus at an appointed time and sit at the back of the top deck. A double-decker upon which a large advertisement for a play had been placed on one side reading outright terror, bold and brilliant. Please think about that sign on the side of the bus and the sick minds of the people who planned the attacks. Now this is where it gets weird because we are told that Haseeb Hussain started from Kings Cross Tensling station and was seen on a number 91 bus travelling west along Houston Road to Houston station where he caught the number 30 bus that would have then travelled east back along Houston Road retracing his steps back to where he started from at Kings Cross if it had not been diverted into Tabis Stop Square. Why would someone carrying a large heavy backpack do that unless he was following the script written by someone who knew in advance that that particular number 30 bus registration LX03 BUF would be diverted into Tabis Stop Square and that Haseeb Hussain would therefore not be able to get on it at Kings Cross Tensling which is where he had arrived at on the train from Loon. Only someone who is a stranger to London would do that without asking why because it is a totally illogical thing to do for someone who knows London and knows that the number 30 bus goes past Kings Cross Tensling station so that they could have caught it there instead. It would have been a complete waste of time, energy, money and an unnecessary risk to take and thus a totally illogical thing for a real terrorist to do. It now gets unbelievably weird because the number 91 bus that Haseeb Hussain is reported to her taken from Kings Cross along Houston Road to Houston Station to board the number 30 bus registration LX03 BUF that got diverted into Tabis Stop Square. Actually goes to Tabis Stop Square. So if he wanted to get to Tabis Stop Square he could just have stayed on the number 91 bus and be sure are getting directly to Tabis Stop Square. The number 91 bus route goes from Kings Cross to Tabis Stop Square. That is conclusive proof that that particular number 30 bus registration LX03 BUF was part of Peter Power and his customers mock terrorist drill, pre-rigged with explosives like the three tube trainers and was pre-planed to be diverted into and blown up in Tabis Stop Square rather than blown up by a backpack bomb. However planned this obviously planned to kill Haseeb Hussain with that bus explosion so he could not tell anyone what had happened just as they had planned to kill the other three Muslim actors with the explosions on the three tube trains. At 0900AM and number 30 bus registration LX03 BUF left Marble Arch on its return journey to Hackney Wic. It arrived at Euston Bus Station at 0935AM and was then diverted from its normal route into Tabis Stop Square and stopped outside the medical offices of the BMA where it was blown up at 0947AM as part of the terrorist exercise gone live. This also fits with the BBC Panorama mock terrorist program of May 2004 where the explosion of a road vehicle was scheduled to take place after the three tube train explosions. The bus bombing in Tabis Stop Square has the hallmarks of a satanic ritual sacrifice mimicking the Passover with blood over the door posts and limpedal. Later used in the Beijing Olympics sick ritualistic closing ceremony. Tabis Stop House is where the infamous Tabis Stop Institute that initiated the dark art of mind control and psychological warfare against the British people was founded. Were they trying to tell us something? Or were they leaving a symbolic signature that only those in the know and few others would understand? Passover, Psyoth, so that any high-ranking Freemasons and Zionists who had not been privy to the plans of the false flag attack beforehand and who are strategically positioned in places of authority throughout society would quickly fall into line with their script. Notice the roof comes off the bus and the 13 umbrellas representing the 13 people they claimed died on the number 30 bus in Tabis Stop Square. Having now had the opportunity to actually visit Tabis Stop Square after being extradited to England, I have found out that the Israeli company ICTS's UK Head Office is in Tabis Stop Square, actually in Tabis Stop House right in front of where the number 30 bus blew up. In fact, if the explosion on the bus had blown forwards instead of backwards, everything would have literally landed on their doorstep, South entrance D. So they had a front row seat from which to watch the explosion, perhaps even to have detonated the explosives from there as well. How fortunate for them that the explosion was at the back of the bus close enough to watch it without getting hurt by it. The driver of the bus on that day was not the regular driver. Why did the driver stop the bus in that exact spot? Employees at the Stagecoach garage said that on the Saturday before 777, a team of people came to service the CCTV system on bus LX03 BUF and that they were not the usual people and, unlike the usual people, they were unfriendly and wouldn't have anything to do with the garage staff. They also spent more than 20 hours working on it and unheard of length of time for that job which would normally take a couple of hours. What were they doing? rigging the bus with explosives and sabotaging the cameras? There is a photo showing what appears to be an angle grind a cut as though the bus was cut ready for the roof to blow off. Normally with the bomb inside a bus, the roof would stay on and just the windows blow out. So this again is not normal. Another explanation for that cut could be that it was made by a shaped explosive cutter charge. The top of the bus appears to have been very cleanly cut off in an exact straight line. A white van from a demolishing company called Kingstar is seen and photographed parked at the side of the bus immediately after the explosion and the mysterious witness Richard Jones gives an account of what he says happened to the bus on camera which is something that normally would not be allowed by the police unless it was part of the film training exercise. Then after a spate of very contradictory TV and newspaper interviews within a very short space of time that makes sure everyone now believes the explosion was caused by a suicide bomb on the bus Richard Jones disappears from view. However, and of particular interest, some newspapers including the UK's Sunday Mail on 10 July 2005 reported that Richard Jones served in the apprenticeship at an explosive factory in Asia. Richard Jones statements about the suicide bomber are very suspicious for two reasons. First, because they are so inconsistent and contradictory that they are not believable. And second, because criminals usually accuse someone else to divert attention away from themselves. Is that what Richard Jones did? He says that he and eleven other people got off the bus just before it exploded. Were the twelve of them a team with the other eleven there to cover up what Richard Jones was doing as he planted a bomb? Another strange statement he made to the Sun newspaper reported in the 8th of July 2005 edition is that he got off the bus because he had reached his destination. How could he possibly have reached his destination on a bus that had been diverted from its normal route? Unless he was part of the mock terrorism exercise team and got off the bus as planned in Tavistok Square after planting a bomb just before it was detonated. Does he work for King Star? King Star, whose white van was parked next to the bus, is a company that specialises in controlled demolitions. And Richard Jones said he served an apprenticeship at an explosive factory in Ayrshire. Was the King Star van there as part of Peter Power and his customers training mock terrorism drill to supervise the mock explosion that became real? King Star took part in the BBC to hit piece conspiracy files 777 and stated that the back of their van was caved in and needed to be repaired. When the explosion happened the back of the doors got caved in and the roof was dented through for whatever reason I'm not sure but something get the top of the roof. But if you inspect the photos taken on 777 there is no sign of any damage to the van. Even the relatively fragile plastic real lights are intact so it appears that their statements cannot be trusted. If Haseeb was saying was supposed to have been on that number 30 bus registration LX03BUF how would it be possible for him to get the exact bus that would get him to one of the four locations where the mock terrorist exercise would be taking place when that bus was diverted from its normal route to Tavistok Square unless he had been recruited to play the part of a mock terrorist and told exactly which bus to get where and at what time by the people who organised the mock terrorism exercise and who knew the bus would be diverted to Tavistok Square. The odds against that happening by coincidence are unbelievable and thus it is not possible that it was a coincidence. Another unbelievable coincidence is that all of the CCTV cameras at all four of the blast sites were not working that day. The four CCTV cameras on the number 30 bus were just like the Israeli variant systems ones on the underground not working and there are no reliable witnesses who can place Haseeb Haseeb Haseeb on the number 30 bus. Richard Jones is an unreliable witness whose physical descriptions of the man he says was the suicide bomber does not fit with Haseeb Haseeb's appearance or what he was wearing that day. So there is no proof that Haseeb Haseeb was either on that bus or blew it up. Even so he has been tried and wrongfully found guilty of blowing up the number 30 bus by the government organised and controlled media machine without a shred of real evidence. They claim to have found Haseeb Haseeb's ID in Tavistok Square. However they also state that ID from another of the four, Muhammad Siddiqui Khan was found at all four separate blast locations. He cannot possibly have been in two never mind three or all four locations at the same time proving that these items were planted after the blasts. How could their IDs have survived suicide bomb blasts? Millions of people are aware of the magic fireproof Muhammad Atapastbol that was planted at the World Trade Centre on 9-11. In light of these incidents if ID from Haseeb Haseeb Haseeb was found at Tavistok Square it does not necessarily mean that he was on the bus and not somewhere else or if he was on the bus that he blew the bus up. There is no credible witness who has placed Haseeb Haseeb Haseeb Haseeb on that number 30 bus and that includes Lisa French who took five years before she supposedly remembered seeing him and then gets the bag wrong saying it was a square laptop bag not a big rucksack. Also people who were sitting around the seat he is reported to have been sitting in did not see him. Does this look like a laptop bag to you? What has happened to the presumption of innocence and being considered innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a jury of your peers in court that has always been the mainstay of British justice? The most likely case is that the number 30 bus had been pre-rigged with explosives during its previous service when the CCTV cameras were disabled. The CCTV systems on stage coach buses are normally either the Israeli company variant systems RV 12001 or Timespace X200. A witness, Richemow Marie Oates Whitehead, age 35, who worked at the BMA in Tavistok Square and was hailed as a heroine for her actions during the London bombings, said she heard two explosions on the bus. The controlled media immediately went on the offensive and did a character assassination of the heroine because her testimony did not fit with the official story and she died unexpectedly shortly afterwards. However, other witnesses also reported a second explosion on the bus. Richemow's and other witnesses' testimonies would account for pre-planted explosives and a bomb being planted later on 7725. What we can be certain about though is that either on the bus or elsewhere, Haseeb Hasein, like the other three Muslim patsys, was murdered. 7th chapter title, pre-planted explosives. Witnesses of the tube train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks and no backpacks or bags left unattended on the trains in the carriages that blew up and the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains. I just got on the train sat down reading the newspaper about us getting the Olympics in 2012 and I've had quite a good feeling about everything, sitting on the train going to my audition. Must have been not much longer than 30 seconds, all of a sudden. It didn't feel like I was on the train anymore, something was very very different. It was very strange, I had this very heavy feel to it, it's very heavy kind of not of this world feel to it. As I was getting off the train I noticed that there was a hole and the hole was as if there was a bomb or an explosion and burst up through the floor of the train and that was just about there. Explosives under the train floors, powerful enough to rupture the carriage floors and bend them upwards, would also lift the carriages up off the rails and derail them as did happen. Those explosives were not homemade but military-grade high explosives that would not be available to Muslim suicide bombers. The official story was that they used homemade explosives which has later been proven to be alive. The presence of military-grade high explosives was confirmed by Christophe Shabot, Head of the French Anti-Terrorism Coordination Unit as well as Scotland Yards Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick. Forensic investigations are a scientific process, the discovery of military-grade explosives confirmed by experienced professionals doesn't just happen by accident. They also stated that the bombs were detonated by timing devices, not by suicide bombers. This is the Russell Square tube carriage that Jermaine Lindsay allegedly blew up. Further proof that the government lied about the explosives is the fact that the explosives that were used could not have been homemade in a bath TATP because TATP explodes without generating any flames or heat. And we know from the famous photograph of the woman in the Burns mask that the explosives that were used burned her and others. So we know from reliable eyewitnesses who can be traced that there were no backpack homemade bombs or Muslim bombers inside the tube train carriages that blew up and that the floors blew upwards. So the bombs which were made from military-grade explosives must have been fastened underneath the floors of the train carriages. Only people having access to the tube trains during the times that the trains were not running would be able to plant those bombs under the train floors. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli finance minister, said that he was warned by Scotland Yard not to leave his hotel room on the morning of 77 2005 before the first explosion was reported. Implying that they had four knowledge of the plant. Scotland Yard then quickly denied being the ones who had provided the warning but have not told us who did warn Netanyahu if they did not. Why was Benjamin Netanyahu warned but not the British people who pay their wages and whom they are paid to protect? Was it because it would have spoiled their evil plan to murder British people to change the nation's mind about British troops fighting in the Middle East? Two weeks later the head of the Israeli Mossad, General Mayor Dagan, said that he had warned Benjamin Netanyahu at 08.40am on 77 2005, 10 minutes before the first blaster could. How did he know what was going to happen in London if Scotland Yard did not warn him? Did he wait to warn Benjamin Netanyahu until it was too late to warn the British people so as not to spoil their evil plan? Was the London bombing a covert MI5 operation or an Israeli Mossad operation or a joint operation by both of them? The British people have the right to know. Tony Blair said on the day of the explosions that we know that these people act in the name of Islam. When there was no proof whatsoever of who had done it, therefore indicating he possibly had four knowledge of the plan and who they intended to blame and the reason why they were going to blame the Muslims. As proof that this was a slip up and needed covering up, look at how the BBC later falsely reported his actual words, giving further proof that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and the coverage was organised exactly as Michael Portillo said it would be in the BBC Panorama program in May 2004. Later that same day, Ephraim Halavi, a former head of the Israeli Mossad, wrote in an article published on the Jerusalem Post website at 1810pm London time that the attacks had been carried out simultaneously with near-perfect execution. How did he know they had only been near-perfect? How could he have known what the perfect results should have been in order to know that the actual results were not perfect unless he was in on the clock? How many more people had they intended to murder in order for it to be considered perfect execution? How did he know at least two days before the London authorities released the information on the 9th of July that the bombs were detonated simultaneously unless he was in on the clock? As proof that this too was a slip up, the Jerusalem Post article in question was completely removed from their website after people began to ask similar questions. The following day, Police Commissioner Ian Blair also made a slip up on camera and said that there were four miserable bombers and then very quickly corrected himself showing that he too possibly had four knowledge of the plan to use four Muslims as patsys. If London could survive the blitz it can survive four miserable bombers like this. I'm not saying there are four bombers for miserable events like this. We are told that the first reports were of an electrical power surge that occurred and then later we were told that there were bombs that exploded on the tube trains and that it was an al-Qaeda terrorist attack with Muslim suicide bombers carrying backpack homemade explosive devices onto the tube trains. A couple of weeks later a Brazilian contract electrician is brutally and publicly murdered on a tube train and again we are told lies by the police and media about him. He was a contract electrician for whom had he been working and what had he been working on in the days leading up to the 7th of July 2005. Remember that the first reports from the media about 7th of July 2005 were of an electrical power surge and John Charles de Menes' was a contract electrician. What he hired as part of the terrorist exercises 1,000 people to wire up devices for mock explosions to be set off by a power surge. Did he see the explosive devices being fastened under the tube train carriage floors and later realized what had really happened and was starting to talk about it. Did they, the hierarchy enslaving him, publicly execute him to shut him up and as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut? We have been unable to find out where he worked. We know about his cousins who live in London and his family coming over from Brazil but we do not know where he worked. Why? The murder of John Charles de Menes' is also very suspicious because of what the authorities did or in reality what they didn't do that day we should have been standard operating procedure if they really did believe he was a suicide bomber wearing explosives. If they really believed he was wearing explosives they would absolutely not have let him get on a bus or a tube train. They would have taken him down when he was in the middle of a street, equidistant from the buildings on either side of the street in order to minimize the risk to the neighbours. They absolutely would not have let him get on a bus unless it was all scripted as another sign up to reinforce in the public's mind the attacks of 7-7 two weeks previously. They let him get on a red bus to remind the public of Tabistock Square and then on to a tube to remind them of the three tube bombings and keep the public in a continual state of fear to make them more easily manipulated and amenable to allowing more anti-terrorist legislation to be passed to remove even more of their freedom and more draconian measures to be taken by the police to protect them. It would also send a message that if anyone talked this would happen to them too. According to an article by international investigator Peter Ears in his blog John Charles Domenezes was murdered because he was about to become a whistleblower. Having previously installed ADT CCTV cameras which generated images of the real 7th of July 2005 bombers. Quoting directly from his blog at section 16 Crescited Dick, Naydick. Crescited Dick is a Matrix 5 principle and an alleged early adopter of the joint automated booking station, Jabs for spoliation of evidence at crime scenes associated with murder for hire. She was an alleged lesbian principle in a live or contract for the use of a gold room Jabs to coordinate the 2005 London Underground bombing campaign. She allegedly used the gold room to coordinate the July 22 murder of prospective gold room whistleblower John Charles Domenezes, a Brazilian technician who had installed ADT CCTV cameras which gen