Fake Manchester Attack - Richard D Hall

Video Transcript:

Chywychwник gw Germanfa vacun i wyt beth o y wytrydgegrot iawn i diplomod y eyeelwn. Nic chi'm yr loss ar fan o frang i ddimidad farbydd. Datalltyedd Ieith Probably raised of the silw i fyw fo fywna a'i skeletaheartwll. Mell jedu'r am orgdau amytmod rhw gymellain y Yinglu i'w, ac eicefno gwneud 60 anderen honegb ym un sc seventh o'r ma' bwrch Nattydiad yn oeddu hwch i ran o beth o. Raniau, syniad am att such Luigi Porwbwer percent, 때 yn y dydraethau swyd fwm réuna o Insta Mediŵr y Cwrithael yn gwyr. Ng Waithiau trawg 기다�érihaus o Gyniad, hawn i'r 20,000 pebothyrd yn hydraigio. i pebl diwr yr ai itlet an blreithio ac et Whit Pal cz nagelfioedd тau h specificuzio ardabyn ac wagdau o'r Dglydech wedi ei wnaeth mo yna gwerat… ...sau yna llawer sdu cyn plasma hynmau o leitio hodde tu ac gallu caldłychio ac Hamdrumioedd ddech sydd, …cylch glsdu yngll帶ethaffaidd i fwardeffaiddurr daethor, a ymr newjir o blenychau un wneud rh שew daethaffaiddi yma yn fwardeffaiddorffu!Shafodlar, ac furious, sy'n barod rydystad Philip Dor を cwymsiお plyw amγ yn ad-ethwchiasiol eich halnu'r tachodaf墨 yn rhoi o implies energ生 likewise i pand passing i fazau cyfynol rhoi. U ben rhoi. Meth 7 glasdu yn yr fw nad yna Fwarreffaiddio'n gallu girthfeer o continu hyff fruitaidd. Felly yn cly follows vào i'r barn newyddwch chi'n digwys. Lennonna'r bod yn caelohorn a ph tbsp Roza一定 pethniafiau taftill meithraeth f прив placeат secill, erait i'wlo eraill i'rain weighnaeth byna yn eion oem raises tuair guy Fu Events Chiantoiff. Roeddwn Martin Zskoosidwau rhwch, Aur Yna Llwch, o'n peth passena faltra mae ag i'wог hein y ry posting, fusira into srwy wedaod, ein yr arod y fungels, eu dim yna? eraill grewdd peth Awesome a heardog os i gr mezaad neu etaliol Roeddwn i'n voyot ac ychyd бог, ac yn gweld hyn sy'n edig, ac yn ymdedig ar un ei sicwci peanut, a managed knockup Имau y�'r dus, yn seurebeth syli, ac i'w proudel o fewn, yn fy largestal o press genPHa fel ar eithio bell. Eeggydd ei mis bod allu recipe Matcha ddiw wedyn meddwl chi'r pew ? Dynwgynny'r y dyma a pethau cy Kelvinio yncarogram yn byn gofneud ac ar ddym yn dod oeddwn yn caeth yn bladod Classicion Mae pofel ikwyllig drwyngol phóithau gwest insertedio manel. heithi'n datzo admisel ei kerbyn sut confliwy, ac mae'n datzo admisel 11, ac yr yw report te i wrth sy oeddin ei synny, fel bod AMOR I BALYBALL, neu sidhoes i D anoddeg i brlywhatort a matur ac au gyfer ferdafoddu convinced o ailau adegiliau. Mae ondfedden i fi enw rydyd wedi'n reed, o ei o foog o' gyd ihol unond feith gyms ryd feizio. To wedyn maearen dewche, yrf Yeseon模 Marchegio'r mwy'o grotno'ng angalio'n arود, a wneu Olaf wedyn ni'n medрушillau a sydd pam öll i ffordd. Tiad i ar y tres iawn y fwy i ni'natt y fara zarae ar osylu ffaeth cyntnal, Methamweddewr kayakos cantol y gall BBC'. Ly tu bod yn ni'bó'r y dog un tested i ni'n new 떠� sureeb Administration i ffwaeth baseth, mae yst i'wain i'r edry'n db gim effeid. Rydych Timothy waeth bwysfeld y fareid rydyn neu anyr the apple. o reinewyr, da dim! Maeمن a mae'r gyda a'r doofa'r adegdden. Mae'r adeg feuddi가�wyr ni'n 않는w'r romannowio! Mae'r metawedaint felly ddiwron. Ma fallen yn oeddwn yn si Dankeitanc, a bornwyd ar nå i'r push am. Dada, o gyda'r cynnod ddod��, bod yn cyfitellwna licenseus newd, rhoi'r i Tehwod o'r ar leakingwyd i bo'r gwaith i ac i'r charfat i ieunain. B mfntar a watogao? bluriddwch doeddau cyfarbu yn prreud y fuz Mindc hau panorddiad a dyna fo'r gafoddマ a yng Nghymru今天. Tim, g媽ai'r gydfa a fowuret iawn i'r re byddor Eidos? Mae'r g statisticsic mewn a lochемio bachetau roedd ar yna organis— Mawais? i aggravacol o bottom sexual. Ond, sy'n cfwasat i cos Baldd medhael un safethiaethio'r yne sehen. Micweddod eitarol fridio ifelly y trelo anod decreasingoprawdod yn wiradaeth amall ni'n fwy ymryd detailedau. Norm deillan y sefer ool arena phanod cytoriaeth gyntafodna fyddfaol siolau fel sy'n caos am fosymig. Madhwys Inaeth y Falobodda am bod lewna un dawn, i possibly ten wedi gy likely our ’ constru i gy dampau b arti am Gwelddad已經 aršar anoddau atолwfeth wivesr Bushntarethau, le番 なir fel am i dyffredd помed. Stageborth, oedd swellau o zewn roedd c 확실히 bod o feyddiad yn iawn am yn cyfoddiad. Maeedd ac hebd fullyu siu bod yn cael rhau sylflangau ar gyfrwydd dwiuke mwyn yma. Mae'r sgwytt hyrwy y Alphaam a chwy Elizabeth Romand attacked. Laureafenioedd sy'n gyfrpeł ol' i yw n 천 o'r gorfiad dro'i i'w graf ail. M'n gyfr爾g appeared roedd jealous o tharfiddol arall ay sut fe wedi roedd d symol, i diwsorfaram yn yffanc os betihol ms. Ac yn ranreadawn. Iwarillwawn swim bok bweblir am hyd o'ch amser. Mae'n dodjod, symbadol put crucial cyr amino hyder. micro lagioFire. Felly, agrof Mae'n boot un Wyd ar usat y llref genpus yn ymwyr, a yn hopingos yn yn y shit reusable d comebyn ag y mysfroeb sicruminor amfiad ac lel i'wdych wedi ddod yn'r Aegendrian i telwwb, ond yn callu synodigo Domio'r Book NCT. Rydym ni car tyddydd hidw ynmişir i'r partwch ac mae venyaid rheogbend Data Es Jewlnych i rydig âol losbro�� fys拜 didalis, ymst rowd di штwodog diiDaid, rydig wedi'n amdinci Everton Iys der!'yd o fod che siarderguje o fod yn Lyfnud wr자 fe ydwed! Eli eich BT achorti ar gyfer United CHEERING A 2.5 instnu o dalosing o yAS fel i ungu sy�lw Iac Kane. Buti'r g long. Lים ni ki pech pan o boreg a cersus fel Nestor clapping yn meunig. Nyw i galluniau a newiduaeth romift yn cyfan yma na na ffletsu ganfoiff wedi'i'r amgen 2014. a pof Burada i'w roe Familie website. Yrnyawn i'w malar Afer Lynayd o'rus. Mae'r conti bob i»tat, tu i'n cyngryd i wedi seid. Mae'rgest worwr graphau Alrightaedd, o'r p Go Bag a neu'n ymforthio y o'r 1030 o'r naut. So, how can that be? This image is taking a 10 past 7 in the morning. We see it again here. 10 past 7 in the morning. Now, you may recall last week the clock went forward and if you've got a mobile phone, it probably put the clock forward itself. That's because mobile phones get their time from the network. Mobile phones now are very, very accurate. It's very unusual to pick up a mobile phone and for it to have the wrong time on it. Now, this is the website that it was uploaded to. This screenshot was taken by UK critical thinker on the 19th of June 2018. And one of the fields in the database, we see it here, is the creation date which dates, may the 22nd to 2017, at 4am in the morning. Now, this is an American website and I believe this organization is eight hours behind UK time. So, if we add on eight hours to 4am in the morning, we get 12 noon. So, this entry here is also suggesting that that photograph was taken in the morning on the 22nd of May. So, this is a second piece of forensic evidence because this is separate from the exive data. It's a separate piece of forensic evidence suggesting the image was taken in the morning, not at night. Not exactly show how this is created. It may be created automatically when the image is uploaded. It might be entered by the person uploading it. But it is showing that it was uploaded around about noon that day before the attack, the attack it's alleged to have occurred. Now, UK critical thinker was really excited by discovering this. So, we started talking on Facebook to people about it. And very shortly after that, it changed. So, it had been like that for a year, 4am. So, 3pm it changed too. So, if you add eight hours onto that, you get 11pm, which fits with the official narrative. But we've got the original screenshot. Now, just have a look at this. I'm going to show you the video in a minute. But just have a look at the still first. I'm going to zoom in to part of it. What does that look like to everyone coming in here? Daylight. That looks like the daylight shadow from early morning sun. Now, also this glass door here, we've got a very bright light there on the other side. If you look at the other side of that glass door, so that glass door would be about here. All right? There's no wide lights that would cast that sort of light on the door. But if you look straight directly opposite, you come to these ETFE panels that I mentioned before. Yeah? Which would let Daylight through. Now, there's a canopy over this set of glass doors. And then you've got a glass here. So, I think what we're looking at there, I think that's the canopy. And there's light coming through the ETFE panel on the other side of the train platform. Right? Daylight. That's the third piece of forensic evidence suggesting that what was going on here was happening in the morning at 10 past seven. I've done a little impression here. This is what I would expect that door to look like if this was happening at 10, 30 at night. It wouldn't look like that in my opinion. And it also seems that they were possibly trying to control the light in this area. We've actually got a cover, a gray colored cover over that window. And I think that window. Here are some images taken at daytime, at night time, previous to the attack. We see that they usually have these ceiling lights on. They're turned off on the actual night of the Arigrande concert. So, were they trying to reduce the amount of light in that room? And as I say, we see covers on some of the windows. This is an image taken a few years before. And we see that these are indeed windows and they go all the way down to the floor. So we've got a window up to about seven foot, one maybe 12 foot. But what they did, they replaced this canopy, cut with an advert for, it's called Prime. I think it's for VIP tickets. But we've also got the same logo, Prime, covering these windows. So all of this window section here is being used for this advert. But not on the night of the actual attack. On the night of the actual attack, they've removed this prime signage. You see it's not there and it's not there. And to me, this is the still image and this is the video I'm going to show you in a minute. Behind this person's head, this section of window up to me looks different to that. It looks like a different color. So has this been photoshopped because it was showing daylight people through? I suspect these two windows are covered with a black covering, preventing daylight coming through. Now, it stated in the mainstream media that the big glass skylight, which is above where the bang happened, was shattered, right? UK critical think it was skeptical of that claim. So he got somebody to fly a drone over the arena. This was about two weeks after the attack. So this is from the drone footage. This is the skylight that mainstream said was smashed with the bomb. Here's the train station. So we just give you some stills from the drone footage. Now, this bottom image is an image that I got from Google Earth, a recent Google Earth image just to show you what this glass looks like. And this is a few weeks after the attack. That looks to me from those images like this some covering or screen inside this skylight. It doesn't look like that. So it has this window being covered in order to prevent any daylight coming through. But we see it's intact. It wouldn't have had time to replace all that glass. It was not broken. Okay, so let's show you these videos. Then let's go for the John Bar I first. This is 43 seconds. I want to show you it without the sound first because we're not sure if the sound is correct. So this woman or Lorsche hasn't blurred on her leg. It appears to be walking normally. Look how casual the witnesses are or the first responders. Well, like I said, this is seven in the morning. Let's play it with the sound now. It's not the same thing I'm trying to do. It's necessary to evacuate the area. If it had been mentioned, I saw it hasn't even moved. It does look like they've exploded some time. So I'm going to show you this. I'm going to show you this. I'm going to show you this. I'm going to show you this. It does look like they've exploded some time. There'd be a plastic bag or some device just for the effect. Alright, let's have a look at the 12 seconds one from BBC. We don't know who this came from. It's a 12 seconds one. It is necessary to evacuate the area. Please leave the building immediately by the nearest exit. Now, if you don't want to see a picture of what a real bomb does, so this is from Birmingham bombing, 1974. Look at how much damage there's been caused to the building. Look at those corpses. It's not a pretty sight. Look at the lack of damage to the foyer. This is where the bomb's supposed to have gone off, where I've put the red dot there. Look at the merchandise store. Yet there's, we're meant to have people who are dead around here. But the merchandise store just looks like it's completely untouched. Still with t-shirts on it. In the Guardian, they stated, when the device was detonated, it was so powerful it caused a crater in the arena's concrete floor. And the 23 square metre glass skylight shattered. Complete lies. Again, look away if you don't want to see graphic image. This is what a real bomb does. So in the Manchester arena bombing, this is what's supposed to have happened to the suicide bomber that is torso came off and someone's supposed to have moved it. That's what we should have seen. So that's what a real bomb does. That's a training exercise. This woman is on a phone here. Right? LAUGHTER There's no casualty in that image where you could say, well, where you can see an injury that looks like somebody's died. Every one of those casualties could just be somebody lying down, taking part in an exercise. Now, this is, I believe, a woman called Ruth Morrell. And you saw a war pass the camera there in that shot with this big blood stain on her jeans. Now, during the event that happened at 1030, some of the casualties were sitting around outside being attended to. And here's a photograph from the Sun website. And we see what looks like Ruth Morrell in this image, same platform shoes, the same color jeans, the same blouse. And the same stain on her leg. This is at 1030, all right, this image, OK? Now, let's just have a little look at that stain and compare it to the stain that we saw on the image that we believe has taken at seven o'clock in the morning. Right? This is considerably lighter, is it not? So in my opinion, what's happened here, this is a temp by seven in the morning where she's made this fake blood stain. And she's just put the same crisis act of pants back on 15 hours later and the stains dried out a bit. So that's a fourth piece of evidence, suggesting that this was taken considerably earlier, 15 hours earlier. This is Ruth Morrell, the woman that you just saw, OK? Meeting the green three days later. Note the shitty blue fleece. This is what she said to the queen. And you can find this video. It's just three days after she's seen walking perfectly normally across the camera. I had one of those wounds as well, shrapnel wounds. So I think it's nuts and bolts that everybody's suffered with. And mine's gone through 15 centimeters and out the other side. And then she starts to laugh. So I'm doing surgery later on this afternoon, feeling all care about it, OK? This is Ruth Morrell on the left with Andy Burnham. So why do that? Why put out images that they took in the morning? Well, I can give you a suggestion. I think what they were doing here is they were having a final practice or a practice for what they were going to do in the evening. So I think something similar would have been concocted on the night. But you would have possible members of the public in the area. So there would be members of the public possibly looking through these doors. Or it's possible that a member of the public could get a photograph or what have you. So I think that they wanted their own controlled images to check them before they put them out. So they weren't happy actually producing images from the event because they weren't in control of it as they were in this training exercise. So I do believe on the evening it was a training exercise as well. I don't believe anyone was killed or hurt. But I believe they were practicing here for what they did in the evening. And they practiced a year earlier as well at the traffic centre with a very similar set of circumstances. OK, so what about the people who claim they've been injured or hurt or even killed? Or let's take a look at some of them. A lot of them are alleged to have run out these double doors. And here they are. Now, all of these people on the screen were in the foyer when the bomb is alleged to have gone off or went in shortly afterwards. If you go to UK critical thinker's YouTube channel, he deconstructs many of the interviews that these people have taken part in. And please go and watch them because after you've watched them you will realise that they are all just crisis actors. Let's look at one or two of them. This is Amy Barlow and her mother. So their story is that they were in the foyer when the bomb went off and they ran this way. So the door was alleged to have been wounded. They've exited via the glass doors to Victoria train station. So they've ran across this bridge down two sets of steps. And then they've ran out. This is them here. So that's the mother and this is Amy Barlow. They're caught again on another camera coming out the entrance of the train station. This is the mother, this is Amy Barlow. And then they're caught on a third camera be so footage walking adjacent to the train station. So I'm going to show you the video of them running down the stairs. Thank you very much. I'm just going to show you those two in slow motion. And Amy Barlow looks like she's carrying something in her right hand. Step, step, step, step. So she's running down the stairs and we see you can see her feet. There's another clip shortly after that clip. I'm just going to fast forward this. Here she is here walking. There's no blood dripping from her legs. And it looks like she's not injured. So here she is three days after walking out of the Manchester Arena where we see her walking without any blood. Three days later she's in hospital and is visited by the Queen. That was a bit of a mess. She's on the way. Right. Then sometime after she walks out the train station she sits on a wall and both her legs start to bleed. Now this guy Nick Bickerstuff, you can find this video online. I'm not going to play it. He's walking around the concourse with his mobile phone filming himself looking for his daughter and he says words to the effect. People don't realise what's happened. There's people being blown in two over there. So he's clearly been given a narrative of a bomb. But if you analyse this video it's shot before the concert. Nobody's trying to leave the concert or panicking or anything. Everyone's just walking around normally finding their seats. So another crisis actor. And I could stand here and do that with all of these people here. But if you want to study it further go to UK Critical Thinkers YouTube channel and you'll find all of these people analysed. One of Pete Hayat's students has been helping me with statement analysis and she looked at some of the statements and she states, having looked at four of the testimonies of the Manchester witnesses who claim to have been in the foyer at the time of the explosion, it is my opinion that these witnesses are not telling the truth. I have found indicators of sensitivity within their language and they don't use the expected language that you would find from people who had been caught up in a real bomb attack. The emotions are not right. It seems to me that they have been given a basic story to work from and their words are coming from the story and not experiential memory. So this is a very similar conclusion to what UK Critical Thinker makes in his videos. That they have been given things to say and a story but they've been given the same story. You find that their witnesses just come out with the same thing and their stories don't actually lock together. Alright, so we'll ask the question, how could they rope so many people in to lie and take part in such an event? Well, I think probably the biggest motivating factor apart from signing a contract is the money that they've received. So I wrote to the fund and this is an email that I've received back from them telling me how much money had been dished out. So in total, according to them, 20.6 million has been dished out to the survivors and the families of the bereaved. Apparently, well, they claim that they were 176 people who sustained physical injuries in 368 who were psychologically injured and of course, of course, 22 people tragically lost their lives. Why do they need to say it, of course? So if you do the maths, 20.6 million was distributed, 40% was gifted to bereaved families. That works out in an average of £374,000 per family. I have heard higher figures of half a million for the bereaved families and £44,000 for anyone who was physically injured on average if you do the maths. But again, I've heard higher figures such as 60,000 that anyone who was physically injured and also psychologically injured. I think anyone who was in the foyer got an immediate £10,000. So they've been given a lot of money and some of them have set up their own funding channels and got more money. Now you might recall that I was putting out appeals for witnesses to come forward to rich planet. I wasn't really interested in witnesses from the arena itself because they didn't say what happened in the foyer. I was interested in foyer witnesses, first-hand witnesses. Not someone who knew someone who's next door neighbour was there. They need to be first-hand witnesses. And I didn't receive contact from any first-hand witness until late last year. So I was emailed by a woman who I immediately rang who said that her husband ran into the foyer just after the bomb went off and he was prepared to speak to me and be interviewed by me. So I thought great. So I got their contact details. I got in Mivane and I drove a long way because they live a long way from where I live to go and see them. So I went to their house and I put the recorder on the desk. Let me record it. I've got a recording of it and the couple sat opposite me. Now in the interview lasted for over an hour. So what their story was was that the two of them with four adolescent girls went to the concert and they had a drink in this bar here and then the four girls and the mother went up these steps, took their seats in the concert and watched the concert. The father then went off somewhere else, he didn't want to go to the concert, don't blame him. So he then comes back to meet them at the bottom of these steps and he said he was stopped from going up the steps which I find interesting. Were there sure sex staff who were trying to clear the foyer area to anyone who was not part of the exercise anyway? He was talking to a couple he said at the bottom of the steps. When he heard the blast in his story is that he ran up the stairs against the crowd that were coming down and he went through the glass doors and the first casualty he saw was a man who was stuck in the glass door. So he pulled his leg out the glass door, put a tour to get on there for him and then he saw a woman who was struggling with her mobile phone and helped her. He then witnessed some of the teenage girls who were dying so he described a few of them. When I was listening to him I wasn't convinced by him, I just, you know, when you get a feeling that someone's, you're not believing what they're telling you. And then considering this evidence, this is the day after, right? These glass doors were not shattered. So how could he have pulled someone who's got their leg caught in this glass? So what I did, I got the whole interview and I sent it to one of Peter Hayer's students statement and an analyst. And her conclusion was that yes, the whole family went to the concert, that the girls went up and watched the concert with the mother, but that he did not go up the steps. And her conclusion was that Irranger at the bottom of the steps and went to meet the family outside the arena and then went back to their hotel and that the reason why they fabricated this is just so they can claim the money. Because the story is that he went into the foyer and helped various casualties, then met his family outside the arena, went back to his hotel and then just went home and didn't contact anyone for 10 months, right? And did you do that? So when they heard about the compensation payments, that's when they've contacted the arena. So the conclusion of the analysis was that the couple, both of them had fabricated him being in the foyer so they could get the money. Now why they've then come to me to spin that yarn, I don't know. So what I did was I emailed her, I emailed her when I got the results of the analysis. And I said, I've had your words studied by a statement analyst and her conclusion is that you've lied, you weren't in the foyer or he was not in the foyer. And the reason why you've done it is to collect the money. I didn't hear a word back from her. Probably she just wanted to email her. So what it seems like to me is that this money is creating new fake witnesses which is proping up the official narrative because there was so much stuff in his statements that you can find in the media, right? It was like a mirror image of some of the other stories. But what about the dead people? I've looked at these 22 dead people and I've looked at their family dynamics and their backgrounds, what their parents or they do for a living, and that kind of thing. Does anyone done any research and any of these people who allegedly died? If anyone has, I'd like to hear from you. Well a lot of them are from broken families where they've got step-father's and step-mother's and that kind of thing which makes it interesting. Now having looked at them, I wouldn't say engraved the details but I've looked at every one of them and I've tried to find out as much as I can about them online. It's possible to come up with a hypothesis as to how they've faked each of these deaths, right? I've found that in my mind they fit into four or five different categories, right? So this is just a hypothesis at the moment, right? I'm not saying this is true but from the information I've been able to gather so far, this is how I think they would have faked these deaths. The different categories, right? The first is the pre-vehcated victim. So this is somebody who used to live in a particular place, perhaps with a partner who at some point left there either died or emigrated and they've used that person's identity to say they died when they weren't actually living there, right? So the person they're using an old or historic identity to create the death. The next category is the greedy parents and apprentice daughter victim. So this is a family where the daughter is approaching school leaving age and they are when aspiring whatever actor or physicist, whatever, aspiring in some field. The daughter has been sent to some prestigious place to be educated, perhaps in another country and the parents are being given half a million pounds to keep their mouth shut. They're possibly still in touch on Skype. The third category is the foster or surrogate child victim. So this would be a family where we've been given a narrative about the family, right? But the child is actually a foster or surrogate child and the child who they've claimed has died is gone to another family, perhaps in another country. Then there's the no ties victim. So this would be someone who was a young adult who's never been married and got no children and it was quite happy to have their identity changed to go and live in another country for half a million quid. And then there's the two adults set up victim. So this would be where, because there was a few instances where you've got a person at the concert, they've gone to pick up their children or child, right? And that person has persuaded someone else to come along with them and wait in the foyer with them, right? Even though that person either didn't want to go or didn't really have a connection with the concert and that person's ended up one of the deceased. So I think that they may have been a couple of people bumped off in this incident, right? But not with a bomb. But this is just a work in high-polysis, all right? So why would they do such a thing? Why have they fabricated this event? Well in order to answer that question, we need to answer the following questions. What happened? Well it was a terrorist train and exercise which was made to look real. How did it happen? No, they used a whole order crisis actors. Who was responsible for it? Interesting question. And it is addressed in one of UK critical thinkers videos. He's made a video all about the connections to the United States with regards to Manchester Arena bombing. So the US was the first to name the perpetrator and say that it was done by a Libyan. It was an American artist and there were a lot of other US connections, which I won't go into just now. But you can watch UK critical thinkers video on that. So let's assume that the US lent on, whoever they had to in the UK to get this event organized. Why would the US have done that? Well, the US claimed it was carried out by a Libyan. What would the US do in Libya in 2017? Well Gaddafi was deposed in 2011 but it seems that someone, the US, is not happy with what's going on in Libya. So they've increased their number of drone strikes. So this is a graph which shows deaths from US drone strikes in Libya from 2012 to 2018. So I would suggest that the reason, or one of the reasons for the Manchester attack was to simply justify their offensives in Libya. So as I said at the beginning, fabricated terrorism is one of the tools of state craft in the modern era. So they need an excuse to do this. They have to blame something on someone from Libya. So I'm just going to finish with this. If you go back to 2030 and watch my lecture from that year, you will see that I defined the phony bone of contention as controversy and discussion over two seemingly opposing viewpoints is encouraged in order to reinforce credibility of a subtextual issue which is itself a fake construct. And this recent Sun headline is a classic example of the phony bone of contention because controversy and discussion is being encouraged over this Muslim woman. So there's two controversies. There's the controversy over whether she should be allowed in the country and there's the controversy over whether she should be allowed free speech. I hope no one got sucked into it, please. So they're encouraging controversy in this particular case in order to reinforce credibility of a subtextual issue, Manchester, which is itself a fake construct. And just to commemorate this during the break, we will be selling shitty blue burgers for anyone who's interested. Thank you. Come back a quarter, too.