THIS WILL SHOCK YOU - Fetal Tissue in Vaccines (PLEASE MAKE VIRAL)

Video Transcript:

So, this study involved 74 fetuses, correct? I don't remember exactly how many. I learned to page 12 of the study. 76. 76. And these fetuses were all three months or older when abort it, correct? Yes. And these were all normally developed fetuses, correct? Yes. These included fetuses that were abortive for social and psychiatric reasons, correct? What organs did you harvest from these fetuses? Well, I didn't personally harvest any, but a whole range of tissues were harvested by co-workers. And were these pieces were then cut up into little pieces, right? Yes. And they were cultured? Yes. Okay. Some of the pieces of the fetuses were pituitary gland. That were chopped up into pieces to fit. Okay. Included the lung of the fetuses? Yes. Okay. Included the skin? Yes. Kidney? Yes. Spleen? Yes. Yes. And tongue? I don't recall, but probably yes. So, I just want to make sure I understand. In your entire career, this was just one study. So, I'm going to ask you again, in your entire career, how many fetuses have you worked with? Well, I don't properly exact number, but quite a few when we were studying them originally, before we decided to use them to make vaccines. Do you have any sense? I mean, this one study had 76. How many other studies did you have that you used the border fetuses? Oh, I don't remember how many. You're aware that one of the objections of vaccination by the plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development of vaccines and the fact that it's actually part of the ingredients of vaccines. Yeah. I'm aware of those objections. The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that, which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact. I think it implies that I am the individual who will go the hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad to do. Do you know if the mother is Catholic? I have no idea. So, she should consult her priest. If she has a... if she's a fact-trish, I guess, right? In any event. So, we have 76 in this study. Would you approximate it's been a few hundred fetuses? Oh, no, I don't think it was that many. Probably not many more than in this paper. And I should stipulate that we had nothing to do with the cause of the abortion. Mm-hmm. Some of these are for psychiatric institutions, correct? Actually, what I can say is that the fetuses that I personally worked with actually came from Sweden, from a Swedish coworker. And so, I, in no case, was able to determine what exactly the reason for the abortion was. I'm just asking you, some of the fetuses that you did use did come from abortions from people who were in psychiatric institutions, correct? I don't know that. What I'm telling you is that I got them from a coworker. And if it's stated in the paper, it's true, but otherwise I do not know. So, if it's in the paper, you don't contest it, right? I don't contest it. Okay. Have you ever used orphans to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? I don't recollect ever doing studies and mentally handicapped individuals. At the time in the 1960s, it was not an uncommon practice. So, you're saying, I'm not clearing your answer, I'm sorry. Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s, it was not unusual to do that. And I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. Okay. There's an article entitled Attentuation of RA273 Revelovirus in WI-38 Human Deployed Sales. Are you familiar with that article? Yes. In that article, one of the things that says is 13 is one of the things that says is 13 seronegative, mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay. Well, that's in that case, that's what I did. Have you ever expressed that it's better to perform experiments and those less likely to be able to contribute to society, such as chosen with handicapped than with chosen without or adults without handicaps? I don't remember specifically, but it's possible. And again, I repeat that in the 1960s, that was more or less common practice. I've since changed my mind, but those were, that was a long time ago. Do you remember ever writing to the editor of ethics on human experimentation? I don't remember specifically, but I may well have. Mark this. Yes. On the hand you have some Mark's exhibit 43. Do you recognize this letter you wrote to the editor? Yes. Did you write this letter? Yes. Is one of the things you wrote. The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human informed, but not in social potential. Yes. I do not think that it is difficult to distinguish non-functioning persons from members of ethnic racial, economic, or other groups. Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo? Yes. Did that experiment involve almost a million people? Well, well, all right. Yes. Did you ever visit what was the Belgian Congo and Rundi Rindi? Yes. How many times? Once. Yes. How many times? Once.