Donate.

Advertisement

BOMBSHELL!!! Australian Child Murders Exposed (Mirror)

Please select playlist name from following

[MIRROR] from International Tribunal for Natural Justice
BOMBSHELL BEAUMONT TESTIMONY SET TO SHOCK THE WORLD!
Published on Aug 26, 2018.

International Tribunal for Natural Justice
Published on Aug 26, 2018.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_Q2iVXW3iiIBwbIniWfVZA


Rachel Vaughan's testimony highlights the 1966 “Disappearance of the Beaumont Children” case in South Australia, unresolved after half a century. It also raises serious concerns regarding the Mullighan Report, (a 600-page Royal Commission report of sex abuse against Australia's children in state care over four decades) where the names of perpetrators were supressed, and the truth locked away by the South Australian government for 80 years.

Rachel has put her life on the line to expose multiple murders and mutilations perpetrated by her father, whose organised pedo-criminal ring is allegedly still in operation today. Her testimony was heard via a virtual sitting of the ITNJ's Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Human Trafficking & Child Sex Abuse on 1st August, 2018.

Volunteer, Donate, Act… https://commission.itnj.org/

1 Comments

Please login to comment

Video Transcript:

So Rachel, thank you very much for joining us today. I believe you have the oath in front view. I will be very glad to be through it. Thank you. I, Rachel Vaughan, solemnly affirm by all the dissacred and righteous that my testimony is given freely and without coercion and is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So, I hope may God. Thank you very much. I very obliged for you to, for giving that testimony obviously, everything that you say is of great importance and it's very important that you yourself believe that what you say is going to be of relevance to those who will be listening but also that it is the truth as you understand and have experienced it. I want you to feel free to say whatever you need to say here, this is not a court about you, it is an inquiry and it's one of which we wish to, from time to time, ask questions. So, forgive us if we stop you every now and then we ask things that we think need clarity or some clarification. But in your own words, if you just begin your testimony, that would be very correct. Thank you. All right, so I was born in 1973 and I grew up in a suburb of Adelaide in South Australia called Edwards Town. I'm speaking to you today about an organised group of pedophiles in South Australia who abused me physically, sexually, emotionally and through a systemic ritual abuse spiritually throughout my childhood. What I suffered at their hands was terrible but what I was forced to witness being done to other children was far worse. During my childhood I witnessed the murders of six children. My father, Alan Maxwell McIntyre, was directly involved in all six of those murders. He also forced me to watch him dismember a further two children. I know where two of those children are buried. My half-brother Andrew McIntyre, who was born in 1952, backs up my allegations against our father as he too was sexually, emotionally and physically abused by him. Andrew was also forced to perform multiple bodies of body disposals at our father's behest, incinerating them, then burying from those remains at our former home in Edwards Town, South Australia. It is Andrew's intention to discuss these matters with your truck in on at a future stage. We have another sibling, my half-sibbling and Andrew's full-sibbling Ruth Collins, who also corroborates our allegations of sexual and emotional abuse against our father, in countless documents and statutory declarations, which she has written to your authorities over the past 12 years. In fact, Ruth is named in three books by individual authors, naming her as the only credible witness to have made allegations about what happened to the BOMON children. The case of the three missing BOMON children is a globally known instance of multiple child abductions from the same family. On Australia Day 1966, nine-year-old Jane, seven-year-old Anna and four-year-old Grant BOMONT, disappeared from the beach at Lanille and out of suburb of Adelaide. Since that date, local Adelaide newspapers and media outlets have kept up a running commentary about that terrible event and how the disappearance of the three innocent children troops the way Australian parents looked after their kids forever. It is considered one of Australia's most raffling cold cases. Andrew corroborates Ruth's account of what happened at our home on Australia Day 1966 and what occurred in the weeks both before and afterwood. Both Ruth and Andrew have alleged that both our father and Anthony Monroe were involved in the abduction and disappearance of Jane, Anna and Grant BOMONT. Whilst that is Ruth and Andrew's story to tell, I bring it to your attention as my father has been widely named as a person of interest in the disappearance of the BOMONT children since 2007. Google his name and countless articles appear naming Alan Maxwell McIntyre as a person of interest in that case. My father was never charged, never prosecuted by South Australian police, not for the sexual abuse of his three children and not for the murders that he committed. Alan Maxwell McIntyre died of free man on the 13th of June 2017. He lived out his life openly bragging about the fact that none of his children could ever have been charged with incest, as he had immunity from prosecution because of his knowledge concerning important people. Two more witnesses have come forward in my delegations in 2018 to South Australian police. Those allegations being that our father's close associate and twice convicted pedophile Anthony Monroe was involved in the abduction and disappearance of the BOMONT children. In fact, my father named Anthony Monroe on camera as being responsible for the BOMONT children's disappearance in a filmed interview with journalists Brian Litley in 2015. Adding to validating the five aforementioned witness allegations, the Anthony Monroe, also known as Tony Monroe, was involved in the BOMONT abduction is a salvage and expedition diary, co-richened by my brother, Andrew, in 1966. This diary chronicles the activities of our father, Anthony Monroe and several members of a men and boys salvage and expedition club, which put them all on BOMONT beach in the days and weeks leading up to the BOMONT disappearance. Although Ruth, Andrew and myself were unable to have our father incarcerated for our abuse. My brother, Andrew, has had success in incarcerating one of his perpetrators for child sex abuse. In 2016, Andrew and another man had Anthony Monroe convicted and sentenced to 10 years jail for the brutal sex abuse they endured in the 1960s. Allegedly, the offenses occurred at the same time of the BOMONT children's disappearance. I alleged that the salvage and expedition club of which Anthony Monroe and my father were members was in fact an adjunct to another of my father's daughter's group, which also predated upon children. The second group I refer to has been dubbed by local media as the family. It is my allegation that my father was this particular group's body boy. Allegedly, the family have enjoyed world-document protection from legal prosecution for decades. The family abuses have been filled by hundreds of victims in Adelaide and beyond since the 1950s. Many of those victims, including myself, have been vocal about ZDFUs. In fact, there was an inquiry in 2007 into the treatment of South Australian children in state care known as the Mulligan inquiry commission of report and also titled Children in State Care Commission of inquiry allegations of sexual abuse and death from criminal conduct. As a result of the countless statements of former awards alleging abuse at the hands of this organised, sadistic, work of pit of arms. These abuse state awards have been dubbed the Takeaway Kids. One of those state awards, Kai Meakin, has written a book about his own ordeal at the hands of these predators and his book is actually named Red Take Rape. The Mulligan inquiry chaired by Edward Pikton or Ted Mulligan, QC, documented testimonials from hundreds of former children in state care alleging abuse against 922 perpetrators. The Mulligan inquiry into the institutional responses to allegations of sexual abuse and death from criminal conduct also led to Australian cardinal pill and archbishop Wilson facing court the charges relating to their knowledge of the abuse occurring but failing their duty of care to report the crimes and protect victims. Archbishop Wilson was recently found guilty and sentenced to six months' home detention for his failure to assist the child victims. This inappropriate sentence has caused an outcry of injustice from the victims of the abuse, including from the Greater Australian and Worldwide Community, where archbishop Wilson refused to acknowledge the crimes and prevent further abuse from occurring. During the Mulligan inquiry it was also alleged that many South Australian children in state care disappeared. Death certificate stating the cause of death as natural causes were issued in 100 cases of state board deaths in South Australia. The declaration of natural causes as a reason for child death is not protocol. Eight cases of child death within the South Australian institutions involved criminal negligence. Astounding link of the 922 perpetrators named in the Mulligan inquiry. South Australian police investigated only 13 culprits and of the 13 perpetrators scrutinised only two were ever charged and prosecuted. At the end of the Mulligan inquiry our then attorney general Michael Atkinson sealed the inquiry records suppressing the names of those perpetrators for 80 years. Leaving all of the victims who gave testimony to the inquiry would reason to full betrayed by the government and I was also one who gave evidence to the inquiry that I was not a state board and I was asked personally by Ted Mulligan to provide that information. Andrew will no doubt tell you himself why he believes that some of those state boards declared missing by their siblings and friends during the Mulligan inquiry provided the human remains which he was forced by our father to incinerate by our but sound property during his childhood. What I now wish to refer to was another betrayal of government which is linked to the massive uses of children in South Australia's history. In the 1950s and 1960s approximately 150,000 of the United Kingdom's boards of state were sent out to Australia and other countries including New Zealand. These children have been united Kingdom authorities as the stolen children. These children have been widely reported as being abused in their adopted countries. Most were utilized in labour camps. With the full knowledge and backing of their adoptive governments many were also sexually abused. Countless died due to poor conditions, malnutrition and the nature of the enforced labour for which they were procured. Of the 4,000 children sent to Australia in the 1950s and 1960s from the UK only 2000 remain. The question is where did the other 2000 go? Andrew believes he knows where to find their remains. South Australia has a very sorted history when it comes to the treatment of children. We have the family murders. A group of young men and boys murdered and mutilated in the 1980s and early 1990s who remained were left to be discovered. Then there was South Australia's missing children. Countless children abducted and reported missing in South Australia over several decades never to be seen again. Some of those children include Jane Armer and Grant Piment already mentioned, Joanne Ratcliffe and Kirstie Gordon, Louise Bell, Michael Black and Rihanna Barone. In fact, Adelaide South Australia has the unfortunate distinction of being described globally as the murder capital of the world. We also have the Marolinger experiment where nuclear devices were set off on the outskirts of Adelaide between 1956 and 1963 in weather conditions which allowed the radioactive dust to fall over the greater population of Adelaide. After the nuclear tests, cows were pasted on radioactive grass. The resulting milk, 90 contained significant levels of strontium-90 was then given free to public school children. Later, strontium-90 levels were measured by testing the right famous of exposed Adelaide residents which were collected illegally. Reports that the right legs of cadavers were being harvested by grave diggers and medical professionals and sent off to the motherland can be found in Frank Wolper's 2016 book Marolinger. In this narrative, Wolper describes this government experimentation which has been implemented upon the Adelaide population, the effects of which are still being felt today. I would now like to give a voice to the eight victims who might witness why Father Disposal and who are unable to speak for themselves today. In 1976 at the age of three, I was witness to the sounds of the murder and cited the disposal of a little boy of around four years old on a boat skippied by my father and his best mate. This best mate I will call WB. WB was also a member of the Salvage and Expedition Club mentioned earlier which had as its members persons of interest in the Vomont case. In 1977 or early 78 at age four, I saw the dismembered remains of a child in my father's bathroom along with the severed right foot of an adult male. My father was standing over the bloodied remains with a small catcher in his hands. A private investigator has suggested to me that this girl may have been missing child Eloise Warlidge who disappeared in 1976. In 1981, when I was approximately eight years old, I was forced to participate in the mutilation of a little blonde boy who looked to me to be around six years old. This occurred in a tunnel system which I believe may be the sleeps hill tunnels on the outskirts of Adelaide. The sleeps hill tunnels are currently owned by a close relative of Anthony Monroe who was also a member of the Salvage and Expedition Club in a person of interest by my children's disappearance. At around that same time, I was forced to witness dismemberment of a young man in the back of my father's boat whilst it was parked in the carport, the car part of my former childhood home at Edwards Town. This was during the period of time that the aforementioned family murders were occurring. This victim was approximately mid-teens to early 20s, the dyed black hair which was blonde at the roots, a slim build and wearing a distinctive lanyard. Also in the early 1980s, I was taken to an Adelaide Hills location where, including myself, about nine other children as well as approximately 50 adults were witnessed to the murder of a baby boy of around ten months old. This murder was conducted by a man whom I have identified as looking remarkably similar to a former Attorney General of South Australia. The baby was handed to this man by a young woman with bright red hair and blue eyes, who was wearing a hooded floor length green cape. This was the most horrific of the child murders which I was forced to witness as a child. And I won't describe the death of this baby as it's too horrific, however, I will say that the death involved fire and prepared this poor little thing, poor little child's body for consumption by the audience. My father offered some of that poor babies clushed me that day but I refused to eat it. He insisted repeatedly that I try the meat as it was important for the rest of the group to see that I participated in the ritual that I refused. In 1983, I witnessed the abuse of a ducted 14-year-old boy Richard Kilvon in the cellar of my family home in Edwards Town. Sometime later, I was taken by my father to visit Richard in another tunnel system of what seemed to be a water treatment facility. At the time that my father took me to this facility, Richard appeared to be near death. Shortly afterward, I heard the news reports that his body had been found near a dam in Kurzbrook on the outskirts of Adelaide. The way in which Richard Kilvon's body was discovered by a member of the public and his report responded to by South Australian police is typical of the police response to serious crimes reported in South Australia. A man had found Richard Kilvon's body and called police to alert them to that fact. Typically, the officer this man spoke to did not believe him. It has been reported that it took some convincing for authorities to finally turn up to take Richard's body away. There was a known culture within the South Australian police force where people reporting crimes of serious offenses, especially sexual assault, are treated as delusional. Even more disturbing, the organisation which takes the reports called crime stoppers is not even government-owned. All reports of historical crimes must be made through crime stoppers before a police response can be elicited. The people manning these phone lines typically treat reporters of serious crimes as nuisance callers. In 1983, I was also witness to my father perpetrating the abuse and murder of a ducted 10-year-old girl, Louise Bell. Louise Bell was abducted in January 1983. At some time around June of that year, I found Louise gagged in the cellar underneath our family home in Epistone. For approximately three months, Louise was kept decapitive of my father in our cellar. During that time, in around June of 1983, Louise, family murder victim Richard Kilvon and myself were abused and filmed together by my father suffering and being forced to participate in sexual acts. Not many people had filming equipment in Australia in the 1980s. However, my father had access to state-of-the-art video and filming equipment as a result of his associations with Adelaide's Channel 9 studios. There have been many connections between my family and the family of murdered Richard Kilvon. My sister Claire, player Macintyne now deceased, owned a house in Trandmeer with Richard's Aunt Carol. My second cousin, Penny Ann, was a producer at Channel 9 Studios in Adelaide where Richard's father Rob Kilvon was a newsreader. The Kilvon's purchased Penny Ann's North Adelaide home. The Kilvon's wrote Macintyne family barbecues and I met Richard several times prior to the awful events which led to his death. It has been reported to me that Richard was working for my father's sister Barbara Adams at one of her childcare centres prior to his abduction. During the time Louise Bell was held captive under Arab's townhome, she and myself were both abused by then chief inspector of police Graham Bennett Fraser. Between 1981 and 1983, former chief inspector of police Graham Bennett Fraser was also abusing two other young girls, one also nine years old. In 1986, when those two girls first made allegations against Fraser, his punishment was simply demotion from his rank as chief inspector of police to simply inspector of police. This was due to his 1984 statute of limitations preventing pedophilic crimes perpetrated prior to 1984 being prosecuted in South Australia. That ridiculous statute was overturned some 10 years ago thanks to a growth of dedicated volunteers including my sister with commons. Overturning the statute of limitations contributed to Fraser and others finally being charged with criminal child sexual abuses which perpetrated prior to 1984. As a result of the statutes of limitations removal in 2009, Fraser was convicted and jailed for the abuses of those two girls and he was up for parole in 2017. I put it to all here that the very existence of that 1984 statute of limitations proves that terrible things happened to children in South Australia. In 2012, I first made allegations to South Australian police that former chief inspector Graham Bennett Fraser sexually abused Louise Bell and myself in 1983 when I was nine and Louise was reportedly 10 years old. I made these allegations against Graham Bennett Fraser at the same time that I alleged that my father had killed Louise Bell in front of me in September 1983, after which my father buried her in our Roberts Town back yard. These allegations were reported in a statutory declaration which I handed to my local police officer in Bulwur on the 19th of January 2012. In April of 2012, after hearing nothing from South Australian police about my January statement, I again contacted my local police station looking out at the progress of minor port. It was at this time that I was told that the local court were officer who had taken my statement could not find anyone at the major crime department who would take it from him. I then proceeded to send a copy of this statutory declaration to the major crime department directly. Again, after hearing nothing for several weeks, I contacted the major crime department to query the progress of my allegations. This was not the first time it had been phobbed off by South Australian police. I have been making allegations against my father of sexual abuse and multiple child murders since 2006 and have been roundly ignored. Report numbers have been refused to be given. The sex crimes investigation bureau refused to return my fine calls regarding my father's assaults and all complaints that I have made to departments such as the police complaints authority, police ministers and other statutory bodies responsible for disciplining police, were met with the same continued responses such as your allegations do not warrant further investigation and your case has been deemed an operational matter. That is a very important statement of operational matter as there was an operation in South Australia within police force at that time called Operation Denying and I believe that the name of that operation was specifically designed and a specific directive to South Australian police officers to deny any allegations that were given to them. During that time in the United Kingdom there was a sister operation going on called Operation Red Flag. In May 2012, I finally managed to engage with a crime stockers agent who agreed to continue my calls through to a detective at the major crime department. After speaking with this detective it was decided that an interview was finally required. I was then contacted by a second major crime detective who suggested that I meet him for an interview in the car park of the Christie's Beach Police Station. When I asked why I couldn't be interviewed in the station I was yielded by this detective. He then ran to me that he didn't know anyone at the Christie's Beach Police Station as if this was reason enough to conduct an official police interview in a car park. I found the prospect of meeting this irrational detective terrifying and engaged a lawyer. My lawyer advised me not to meet this detective in a car park of any description after which he organised a meeting at the major crime offices in Adelaide, forming. During this June 2012 interview at the major crime offices in the presence of my mother I told the two attending detectives several facts about the Louise Bell case which had never previously been relayed by the media. Firstly I told them that if first name was Tracy this revelation made the detective in charge of the Louise Bell case nearly fall off his seat. I then told the detectives that after her murder Louise Bell had been buried in my father's former Edwards town back yard over which was poured a small slab of concrete. At the end of the interview both detectives assured me that they would investigate the property in question. Both detectives soon after contacted me on a Saturday night at 9 p.m. The conversation which followed beg in belief both the detectives insisted that the girl who I saw murdered and buried at Edwards town was not Louise Bell. I insisted that she was. The conversation went on for some minutes with both detectives adamant that the girl in question was not missing Louise Bell however I stood my ground as I was certain of her identity. Finally both detectives seem to concede defeat in trying to convince me otherwise and the call was terminated and there was video footage of Louise Bell aired shortly after the two interviews that I had with the major crime department and in that footage it was shown that she had exactly the haircut that was different to the photo that was always aired of her in the media and her hair was sun-ledged is exactly as I described to major crime detectives in my first interview so I was absolutely absolutely certain it was her. In the days following the conversation with the detectives I was called back for a further interview at the major crime department conducted by the same two detectives. At this appointment I had both my lawyer Craig Roberts and my mother present. At this second interview I was told by the detective who was not personally responsible for the Louise Bell case that I must be mentally unwell. This was despite my starkeiac trigger valuation to the contrary which I had sought and cost me quite a bit of money in 2007 simply to lend Craig Roberts to my allegations but was useless. The same detective told me that my allegations regarding a cellar and tunnels which exist underneath my father's former Edwards Tane home. Edwards Town home couldn't possibly exist. The detective stated that he had visited the homing question and looked into too much inspection points assuming that these tunnels were a figment of my imagination. Inspecting these term-like inspection points was unfortunately the full extent of this detective's investigation. He did not look into the room space to find the trap door which I had already told him led to a ladder behind a pantry in the laundry. This ladder led to the underground cellar. The detective also failed to check the end bedroom for evidence of the disruption of floorboards which have been pulled up prior to the current owners moving in. As I had already told this detective the reason the floorboards were pulled up was because the original boards have been cut to allow a small hatch into the cellar below. During my time in the home this hatch was covered over with a piece of free-floating carpet over which my father's bed was always stationed. This detective also failed to discover that these tunnels do exist under the Edwards Town area. I have a private investigator who has finished needing that a plethora of documentation of those tunnels including photographs of the mini-tunnel openings in the area, houses with access to the tunnels and industrial complexes in Edwards Town which document those tunnels in detail. Finally the detective also failed to take ground penetrating radar equipment. The place where I, Elijah Lee's, Louise Bell is buried and scanned for her remains. It has been brought to my attention via child protection advocate that the tunnels underneath the Edwards Town area are still being used today by a group of organised petafiles to use those edificents to traffic children from one house to another. I alleged that some of the houses in question were stitched over this tunnel system with access are owned by members of this also organised group of predators. How do I know this? Because the child protection advocate with whom I am in contact is the support person of a child who is currently being abused in those tunnels and whose abusive parent owns a home with access to the same underground system. This is my main reason for coming to you today. I've been making these reports for 12 years but when I discovered some months ago that this child was still being abused in the same area, I was just so instant as a mother and so disgusted at the South Australian police that I decided to put my life on the line and expect you all here today. Not only do I have extensive evidence that the tunnels under my father's former Edwards Town home exist, my allegation that my father's former home set over a junction of two of these tunnels has also been substantiated. This made my father's former home very well placed for child trafficking purposes. These tunnels led in one direction down that constraint towards the Tock H. Scour Hall, whilst the other end of this tunnel ran under a nearby main road named Crossroad and continued towards the Gonelle train line. One end of the East West Tunnel ran under a home on the corner of Crossroad in Armond Road which my father described as possessing a killing room. I was taken to this house on Crossroad as a small child and practiced and practiced on by men who conducted procedures such as catheterising my yearithro. I suffer yearithro's stenosis to this day as a result of those procedures and have been forced to undergo surgical interventions in adulthood to retain the ability to urinate without a catheter. It is important to note here that my father knew many people in the medical fraternities of both Adelaide and Flanders universities and medical centres in Adelaide. My mother even gives an account that my father used to dissect our female cats. Others have also made similar allegations that my father performed medical percentages on our family pets. However, he had no formal medical training. It was formerly an electrician and wiretapper for Australian Tock H. Scour Hall. The house on Crossroad had a butcher out the front and a bakery at the side. All on the same property, behind a cabinet in the kitchen was a hidden room which was fully lined with stainless steel, including traps at the bottom of three walls and plumbing. The still lining of this room's walls was approximately five feet up each side. I was taken to this house by my father on another occasion when I was also a small child. On that occasion, I was forced to watch as my father instructed and presided over the conduct of two other males, with then butchered the corpses of two men. The two unknown men who conducted this procedure, I had not met prior to this event and never met again to my knowledge. Both men looked very similar but of different ages as though they were father and son. When the bodies were cut up, they were packaged into two separate suitcases. And there have been other cases in South Australia where bodies of dead people have been found in suitcases. I've heard allegations that in 1973, one of our family members who was then age six pointed this Crossroad house out to another family member as they drove past one day. This six-year-old stated that our father had forced him to clean up a lot of blood at that location. This was at the time that two young girls, Joanne Rackliffe and Kirstie Gordon, went missing from nearby Adelaide Oval. This is another of Adelaide's disturbing and all-too-frequent, unsolved missing children's cases. The dual-kid nappings of these two girls from the Adelaide Oval in August 1973 has been dubbed the Oval Abductions. This is a cold case which has never been solved according to the media and South Australia police. However, private detectives and journalists, as well as one victim's family member, have collated ample evidence suggesting a person of interest from the ETAIN Act area, which is north of Adelaide. Despite this major crime detectives also refuse to view or consider that evidence. My father has been named the person of interest in the Oval Abductions case all-seign. In his defence, as an alibi for this crime, my father has stated that he was away as a Navy reservist during the time that the Oval Abductions occurred. However, despite extensive searches by myself and professional researchers, there are no Navy records to support his alibi. Getting back to the tunnel system under Edwards Town, it is my allegation that there are multiple homes of interest along the tunnel system. For example, a family with the so-name of Geasing once owned one original home dwelling that was built in the Edwards Town area. In 1985, a man called Raymond Geasing was convicted then exonerated of the abduction and murder of Louise Bell. It is possible that it was Raymond Geasing's own family home, which stood just up the road from us in Edwards Town, and this may be why he was a person of interest in her case. Of course, I don't know because the South Australian police might share any of their information with me. In the opposite direction along the same tunnel line is a home on Pine Avenue that was owned by a former superintendent of South Australian police, J.A. Vogel saying. Superintendent Vogel saying established the police search headquarters at the time of the Bowingmont abductions in 1966. The tunnel which intersected under my father's family, sorry, my father's former home with the first tunnel mentioned above ran in the opposite direction at 90 degrees, and went under the nearby railway line on railway terrace in Edwards Town, and also under main South Road beyond. It is along this railway line that tunnel entrances can be found, and of which I have several photographs supporting their evidence and their existence, and I remember coming out of one of those entrances as a child. This tunnel at 90 degrees to the original tunnel described here also runs under homes which have access to this tunnel via basements in other openings, and I have proof of those as well. In reference to the allegation that my father was responsible for the disposal of multiple children's victims bodies, I need to refer again to the aforementioned house with the killing room on the corner of Cross Road and Armageddon. As mentioned earlier, this house had on the same property a butcher and a bakery. My father told me many things about this house as I was growing up. We said that the special activities in the killing room spilled out into the butcher and bakery attached. I did not understand this at first, but I do now. My father was accountable. He was quite proud of the fact, and often broke to me, that if he ate the flesh of 100 victims, he would become immortal. This was part of an aspect, or it wasn't aspect of his satanic faith, and my father was involved with the Rosa Crucians, the sect of the Golden Dawn, which was started by Alistair Crowley, my father, a daughter. My family has a very long history with Freemasonry, my grandfather Joseph Wright was supposed to have been ahead of the Freemasons in his time. Okay, my father alleged to me as a child that the bakery and butcher on the property with the killing room on Crossroad was there for butchering and selling people human flesh, and I was only sold to special customers who knew how to introduce themselves correctly. In fact, a private detective has shown me a particular type of sticker that can be found on certain Adelaide butchers, which has a king K on it, and by king K, it decayed with a crown above it, and is reportedly a signal to Freemasons, Rosa Crucians and members of other satanic cults in Adelaide that human flesh is sold there. The butcher on Crossroad outside this house still reportedly sports this sticker, and I've been sent a photograph to show that. This would suggest that clandestine activities in the urban town area are still in operation. The saddest and most infuriating part of my allegation about these tunnels is the fact that had my testimony been properly investigated in 2012, the little child who was currently being abused in Edwitt's town may never have been abused in that location. Further to the interviews conducted at the major crime department in 2012, I wasn't just told that I must be mentally unwell, and the tunnels in Edwitt's town couldn't possibly exist. I was also told by the detective who was the official officer on the bell case that every child born in Australia receives the birth certificate. This was an astoundingly naive assertion by a major crime detective, and my lawyer interjected on my behalf at this point in the interview. The detective made this ridiculous assertion in response to further allegations I had made about the aforementioned eigenvoy, him I saw ritually abused and murdered in the early 1980s. Not long after the humiliation of this second major crime interview, announcements were aired in the media that a section of the former backyard of a man named Dita Finnec was to be excavated in the hope of exhuming the remains of Louise Bell. When I heard this, I became frustrated that my allegations were still being ignored by the major crime department despite my interview. Despite the ill treatment in Iberid seat, I still wanted to do whatever possible to tell Louise Bell's story on Herber Heart. And I was witness to a lot of her suffering, so I feel very responsible for that go. So I made another attempt to contact the major crime department. I was again put through the detective responsible for investigating Louise Bell's case. I asked him why he was searching Dita Finnec's former backyard instead of investigating my claims that Louise Bell was buried at Edwards Town. I was told by him that my allegation lacked credibility because I apparently made the statement that Louise Bell was interred under a small sub of concrete after recent news reports that Dita Finnec's former property was being reinvestigated with particular attention being focused on the small slabs of concrete on Finnec's former property. I was at this point that I came to the conclusion that the detective responsible for investigating the Louise Bell case was fabricating a reason to ignore my allegations. I came to the conclusion because in fact the detective had actually heard my testimony that Louise Bell was interred under a small sub of concrete days before this media story was ever released. In fact, the first time that I alleged Louise Bell's remains are buried under a small sub of concrete was to my brother Andrew in a phone conversation on the 5th of September 2009 and my brother has had to attest to that fact. The first official allegation that I made that Louise Bell is buried under a small sub of concrete was in a statutory declaration to the South Australian police on the 29th of September 2009. On the 1st of August 2016, I took my allegations about Louise Bell's murder to the independent commission against corruption. I was soon informed by an officer of that commission that I could not make allegations to them because my statement involved the misconduct of a police officer. I was then referred to the police on Blitzman's office. I then took my allegations to the police on Blitzman's office and was again told that my statement was not to be investigated. I rang the police on Blitzman's office and asked why my allegations were being ignored. I was then put through to the officer responsible for recommending allegations to the police on Blitzman and man who I will name here as WM. WM was formerly an officer employed by the police complaints authority and with whom I had already had interactions. In fact, WM told me in 2012 as an officer of the PCA that none of my allegations were ever to be investigated by that authority and that he was the only officer I would ever be able to speak to in that department. He also told me during this 2012 phone conversation that I had been dealt with already and he repeated this admonition three times during our 2012 discussion. I might add that it was said most menacingly. There was more to my efforts to have the Louise Bell case adequately investigated but trying to explain it all here is difficult. In 2016, Data Fanig was convicted of the abduction and murder of Louise Bell despite my allegations. This was based on DNA evidence found on Louise's pajama top which was she was wearing on the night of her abduction and which was later placed on her neighbor's lawn by an un-9 person to be submitted as evidence. In other words, this was left out to be found could easily have been contaminated. Despite my contact with the Department of Police Prosecutions in 2016, my allegations were never discussed during those Data Fanig's trial. However, during the trial a letter did suspend the trial for some time but again I do not know if that was anything to do with my allegations. I have suggested that the major crime department compared the two other DNA samples found on Louise Bell's pajama top and never identified against my father's DNA which South Australian police do have on file. I wish now to discuss the final murder which I was forced to witness as a child. This murder was perpetrated in 1987 by my father in the bathroom of that Edward's Town Home. The victim was a blonde blue-eyed boy of approximately 12 years of age. My father and his third wife completely remodeled this bathroom following this boy's murder. Although the tiles were all removed and replaced, it is likely that some of this voice remains are still embedded in the brickwork of the bathroom wall which stood behind him and my father shot him in the head with his rifle. So that concludes the murders and utilizations I was forced to witness as a child and what follows is an overview of my attempts to have my allegations properly investigated by South Australian authorities and authorities in Australia in general. I have contacted over 70 individuals and 20 different departments in attempts to have my statements of abuse and child murder adequately looked into. These include the crime stoppers organisation already mentioned. The Adelaide Sex Crimes Investigation Bureau, the Adelaide Major Crime Department, the Mulligan Inquiring, the Victims Rights Commissioner, the Police Complaints Bureau which I need to mention was disbanded in 2009 amid allegations of corruption and inaction. The Queensland Pidafile Task Force, the Independent Commission into corruption, various police ombudsmen and again I need to mention that in 2016 the police ombudsman's office was also made defunct due to allegations of an action and corruption. The Office of Public Integrity and I love the name of that office because again they completely useless and did nothing to help me. The internal investigation section of South Australian Police, the Department of Police Prosecution, the Legal Services Commission, the Australian Federal Police, two former Prime Ministers, four Senators and 23 Individual South Australian Parliamentarians. Four of those Parliamentarians made the effort to personally meet with me to discuss my allegations and refer my matter for further investigation to the appropriate authorities. South Australian Police similarly ignored three of the Parliamentarians who made efforts on my behalf to force an investigation into my claims. It wasn't until 2016 when Member of Parliament Rebecca Sharky responded to my request for assistance that the Special Crimes Unit finally took action against my father for one of the sexual crimes he perpetrated against me. This was a full 10 years from the time I first made official allegations to South Australian Police about this particular assault. The assaulting question is important to describe here as it indicates my father's involvement in contactivity. In 1975 at the age of 30 months I was just out of nappies at the time. My father statistically and ritually cut into the mecoset of my rectal wall with a curved blade knife after which he raped me annually. He also subjected my sister Ruth the same ordeal when she was four years old. A child protection advocate who is well versed in the activities of Luciferian and auto-temply oriental sculpts, having recently heard my testimony about this assault, as indicated to me that this knife is reminiscent of a ball-line knife or Celtic stickle utilised by such cults. On the 21st of July 2020 I received a medical report from Professor of Colour Rectal Surgery Nicholas Riger. Professor Riger had medically examined me at his North Adelaide Rooms some weeks beforehand. Professor Riger's medical report states that the internal injuries which I described to him which culminated in a permanent cutaneous nerve defect are consistent with my allegations that my father inflicted this injury upon me. In fact, Professor Riger explained to me that the only way to create this sort of internal cutaneous nerve defect is to introduce a sharp object to the area and cut through the nerve and mecoset. Professor Riger in the same report offered to appear in a court of law and make this declaration on my behalf. It took me a further seven years and the intervention of Parliamentarian Rebecca Sharky for I was able to find a South Australian police officer to take Professor Riger's report a substantiation of my claims of anal assault against my father. I have given detail about this particular assault here as it is significant in comparison to similarly injuries sustained by family murder victims in the 1980s and 90s. Unfortunately, during preliminary investigations by the Special Crimes Unit of South Australian Police regarding this assault, my father died. On the 13th of June 2017, in death as in life, my father escaped any possibility of being charged with his crimes. In exasperation after my father's death, I collated a statutory declaration of all of the assaults which were perpetrated against me by my father and other court members during my childhood. This I submitted the Special Crimes Unit on the 29th of November 2017. On the 2nd of February 2018, I received a letter from the Special Crimes Unit stating that the crimes outlined in my statutory declaration which I submitted the near previous November would not be further investigated. So now to this response from the SCU, I read in the news paper that the new head of that department is a former major crime department detective who heard my sister Ruth's allegations and those of my mother back in 2009 but did not act upon them. I now wish to read out to you the 2018 response of the Special Crimes Unit to my numerous allegations of serious crimes against multiple perpetrators outlined in that statutory declaration. As it is a perfect example of the ineffectual responses my self and siblings have received from government departments in this state for the past 12 years. And I'm quoting here from the SCU from a detective scene you cited. Ms Vaughn, I am in receipt of your correspondence dated 29th November 2017 where you wrote allegations against the number of persons for historic sex crimes against yourself and the murders of several children. A detective has reviewed your information. As a result of the reviews, I have determined that no further investigation will be conducted. The information that you have provided will remain on file. I have wondered many times over the years why my father had immunity for prosecution for pedophilia and murder throughout his lifetime. Researchers who have heard my testimony suggested that I look for information relating to MK Ultra Mind Control techniques. After extensive research I came to the conclusion that there are corresponding factors which I and other family members have experienced which leads me to think that my father and his pedophile cult were involved with MK Ultra Mind Control experimentation. My brother Andrew and I have come to believe that our father was a member of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization known as ASEO. The best evidence to support this belief is the fact that our father worked for 40 years as a wiretapper, the telecommunications company Telecom which is now known as Telstra. Our father was also in the Navy reserves and traveled extensively throughout the world on Navy expeditions. He also procured child pornography for the Black market. I know this as I was often the subject of filming. I was filmed both at home as well as at the Channel 9 studios in Adelaide. On one occasion in 1977 when I was three years old I was taken to the Channel 9 Adelaide studios and met family murder victim Richard Kilvin for the first time. I was sexually assaulted on that date by a former Adelaide radio DJ who died not long ago. Another victim of child sexual abuse who was associated with Adelaide's Channel 9 studios is Janet's Priests. Janet had a well-known Channel 9 news reader as a brother. As her brother sorry, Janet's book A Reason to Live released in 2005 chronicles her allegations of sexual abuse perpetrated by her pedophile father. Like me, Janet's father not only abused her sexually, he also allowed fellow pedophiles to abuse her. With regard to declarations by South Australian police employees that there is not one shred of credible evidence supporting allegations that my father perpetrated serious crimes. I have this to say. There is ILECH, solid physical evidence of my father's multiple child murder victims at two of his former properties in Stansbury and Ebbwoods Town. Unfortunately until those remains are exhumed, that evidence will remain elusive. There was significant and anecdotal evidence from my corroborating heart, brother and sister that remains of the three-bomuch, BOMONT children, Lionel Sinkhole at my father's former property at Stansbury on New York Peninsula. In fact, Ruth and Andrew's witness accounts giving credence to this belief is convincing enough for third parties involved with a Facebook page called in memory of the BOMONT children missing since 1966. To publish a petition, to force South Australian police to resume the remains of Jane Arne and Brad BOMONT from the Stansbury Sinkhole. And at last check, over 48, or sorry, 4,800 people have signed a petition. The petition was fueled by administrators off that site, including journalist Brian Littley, who interviewed my father extensively about allegations brought against in Byruth and Andrew in the years of Fortes Death. It is from one of these interviews that I will now quote my father's own declaration about what happened to the BOMONT children in 1966. And I quote, I know a lot about the BOMONT killings. I want the whole bloody mess looked at. Now I'll get around to who killed the BOMONT's. You want to know about Tony Monroe? He is deeply involved. He is one of the most evil pieces of work that ever drew breath. Monroe turned up with the three bodies in the back of the car. And that's an end quote that and that is my father. Here my father sedansiates my sister roots claims that the BOMONT children were shown to her in the boot of our father's car on Australia Day 1966. A claim that she's been making since 2006. Sorry since 2007. The car was parked at SIDA, Eberstown property at this time. In the same interview my father went further to claim that Anthony Monroe and I quote, arrived at my house on the 26th of January with the three children in the boot of my car. I didn't even own the car and it never happened when I was there. I believe Monroe is up to his eyeballs in this end quote. In a sign letter which my father wrote to a major crime detective in 2012 which predates this interview my father also states the following. Tony Monroe is a person of interest to detective Bryan Swann. At the time my father wrote this in 2012, Detective Bryan Swann was the presiding officer over the BOMONT children's disappearance. What follows now is a statement my father made in a filmed interview again with journalist Bryan Littley in which he acknowledges finding his woodmate and convicted pedophile Anthony Monroe in bed with his young son Andrew. And I quote, I caught him in bed with my son. They were bundled and naked. I didn't make a scene. He was a boy, a beautiful boy. He was my son and he was in love with a scout master. End quote and Tony Monroe was Andrew's scout master. At the time that my father states that he found the adult Anthony Monroe with my brother, Andrew was only 13 years old. Monroe had been abused in him being his. I alleged here that only a pedophile could find a grown adult male, make it in bed with his juvenile son and not make a fuss. But my father to then try to blame the interaction on Andrew by stating that Andrew was in love with his scout master is offensive in the extreme and outright lie according to Andrew and is again an indictment of my father's status as a pedophile. Earlier this year the back property of a factory in North Pimpton, just a short walk from Edwards Town, was exhumed in the hope of finding the remains of the Domeont children. The exhumation of this land was based entirely upon the witness account of just one man. I met a furore of media reports that dig at this North Pimpton site you did nothing but animal wounds. Despite this failure the major crime department in Adelaide have continued to refuse to assume the sinkhole at Stansbury. Despite my witness testimony of the murder and burial of Louise Bell as well as another child who was murdered and buried there in 1987, my father's former property at Edwards Town has not been excavated. It has been put to me over the past 12 years amidst assumptions amidst assumptions of false memories syndrome and mass hysteria by members of my family who do not wish to believe that my father Alan Maxwell McIntyre was a murderer in Kyrist, that I and my corroborating siblings have made up these allegations against our father for attention or financial gain. There has been no financial gain in my fight to bring these crimes to light but there has been enormous cost. The negative attention which my attempts to tell the truth of my childhood has elicited the most cruel, vindictive and painful reactions from my once loved family members. He chose to take my father's side over my own and knows of Andrew and Ruth as well. In fact it's been a rocky path for me since I began making allegations in 2006. I wish that I could pretend that these things did not happen as so many of my family members have managed to do. Unfortunately the survivor guilt which I suffer on a daily basis will not allow me to put my head in the sand to pretend that these events did not occur. Not even to say those family members who have denigrated myself Ruth and Andrew for the past 12 years the embarrassment of having to explain their actions and protecting my father from the prosecution and scrutiny he deserved. And I say that because one of my family members contacted me earlier, really last you and stated that if I didn't stop my crusade that many members of my family would have to suicide. It is justice enough that my family will in future have to accept that their misguided efforts have robbed our father's victims of any opportunity for true justice. In speaking about these crimes and the perpetrators who abused me I've put myself in serious danger. Bad things happen to us who blow us in South Australia. My sister Claire's death in 2009 is a prime example of what happens when people refuse to keep quiet about terrible crimes in South Australia. Claire was also present on Australia day 1966 when our father and Anthony Monroe brought the three deceased by my children to our family home in Edwards Town. As my brother Andrew has stated in media reports in June last year, Claire was forced to brush the blood and sand from the children's hair as they lay in the boot of our father's car. In August 2009 Claire made a call to the major crime department and made an appointment to speak with the detective about who witness account of what happened to the by my children in 1966. The next day Claire was found dead with a broken neck in her own backyard. Confoundingly and despite submissions from myself Ruth and Andrew that Claire was most likely murdered because of what she knew, the current South Australian coroner refused an inquest. He ruled Claire's death as suicide and released his findings to his senior next of kin. It is possible that this senior next to kin was our father, the person who myself and siblings alleged to the coroner had likely ordered or even executed Claire's death. It is important to note here that in the months prior to her death, Claire had been reporting to family members that some of us was trying to kill her. Her declarations became so distressing for family members that she was faced in a mental health facility. It was only shortly after Claire was evicted from this mental health facility against her room that she was found dead. It is not lost on me that my allegations put me in a great deal of danger. Claire's untimely death is testament to that fact but it is a danger that I've been forced to face on a daily basis since first making allegations in 2006 and it's a fear I've had to live with my entire life. I've had my father tried to take my life on many occasions. I made the choice to tell the truth regardless of the dangers in 2005 when memories of my disturbing childhood provided my dreams, turning them into a repetitious nightmares. I am now in a position where I've made too many allegations to be able to sit into silence and still hope for longevity. Therefore, I've become before this tribunal today in the hope that my revelations might have last shed enough light on my father's crimes to force authorities to finally investigate. Thank you for hearing my testimony. Thank you very much, Rachel. You're so brave. I think many victims and even dead victims must be incredibly grateful for what you are doing now. Be proud of yourself. I have some questions but I first leave the word to Chris Kerry. I'll be back to you. Thank you very much, Rachel. We're very clear. The testimony that's been given quite clearly as well. Shutterlight upon something in an area that has been concealed clearly for a very long time. This also clearly seems to be in a lot of attempts we made in the past to actually shed light on this from various areas. Do you feel at all, especially in the case of our D to Finnec, but others as well that the authorities have said that they will investigate. They have actually investigated in the wrong place or in the wrong way in order to actually prevent a proper investigation. Yes, I do. Also, the other question that I wanted to ask is that in regard to Dr. Riker's report, would he be willing to give evidence to tribune? I could certainly ask him. It's been some years since I've just met with him, but I do have that report on file. I like that. The report is on file. Perhaps we could look at both those solutions. Without putting many other family members at risk, did Claire overgive testimony on oath as well at any point? Not that I'm aware of. Well, we'll perhaps we'll discuss the other matters offline. Can we share Kerry and Househood? Could you now take the floor? Yes, I do, if possible. If it is too difficult for you to just tell me, Rachel, okay, then you just say it's too hard for me to answer this question, but I think it's important for people who are still doubting that these things happen, that they know some answers to some questions. I've been dealing with this for 35 years, and I have all the victims all over the world who don't know each other who are not from the same gender, who don't speak the same language, who do not come from the same religion, but all the statements are the same. That's why it's important to make a database. My first question is, how come you look so well? I have no idea. I don't believe I do. Where do you get this strength? I ask it to other victims too, because that's what people see. They see a strong, beautiful woman, and they say, welcome, we did that. It is. The same happens because I've always been working, especially with child sex offenders and child murderers, I'm sure they will use your well-being as an excuse to justify that it's not so bad to abuse children and to expose them to such violence, because look at Rachel, she's okay, isn't she? Can you explain that? I've suffered depression for most of my life, and I have a chronic anxiety disorder, which has prevented me from working for most of my, well, for many years. I do have work at the moment, but the work that I do does not require me to leave my home very often. I'm a telephone consultant, I'm very lucky, so I don't have to face too many people. My friends and family can attest that I'm not okay. They can't mess up other health care. It doesn't mean it's true. You are okay. You're very strong, by the way, but what would you say to those criminals, and please don't call them pedophiles anymore, call them pedocriminous or pedosexuals. That's a much better word. What would you tell them? Now, what would you be your message to them if they use your well-being appearance as an excuse that it's not that bad? What would you tell them that they didn't break me, that they may have tried, but I'm not a broken person, I became stronger from the experiences that I went through, but not in the way that I could then become affluent or successful, but in a way that made me so determined to prove that these things did occur and to put those people where they belong in jail. They did not occur. They did that to you. You know, a lightning, a thunderstorm, something that occurs, but what they did was for baby to you. It didn't occur. It is something they decided to do, so it was a free choice. Let's put the right words where they belong. You are not to blame. They are the ones to blame. So that's my first question. The second is... Yeah, again, we see a testimony, as I've seen tens of them all over the world, of the involvement of the states, the governance, the police departments, especially childcare, schools, justice departments, churches, the medical world, well, just think of in the UK's Saville, the boys down in the United States, the Dutru case in Belgium, and each time they have to investigate something, they don't do it, they just don't do it. And you must be lucky that they don't throw a mental health hospital. So, well, it has been threatened to me by my father because he's the white psychologist, so I had those threats. In fact, my father's first wife died in a mental institution shortly after my sister told her what happened to the bone-up children. What did the... What did the Roman children? Yes, yes. So Margaret McIntyre died in Glenside, a mental health facility in Adelaide at the age of 33, and the then coroner Colin Manick, named her death from natural causes. She was a very healthy woman, 33 year old woman. So, it doesn't mean that all these people that write false reports are involved in the crimes themselves, that we are speaking of thousands or thousands of uncountable cowards. They know what they don't speak like you do. I would like those cowards to finally get out of the dock and start talking, and there are many. Be it in childcare, be it the coroner, be it the doctor, be it the judge, dock. What would religion have your father? He was a member of the Golden Dawn, sect, and a rose accrucian, and I believe he was also a Freemason. Well, that's not a religion, is it? Well, depends on where you come from. What were your father's profession? In fact, was an electrician. He was an electrician, but he was a wiretept, so he listened to the phone calls of people on a daily basis. That was his job. But did your mother do as a profession? She was mostly a mother, but she also worked for a car-a-pactor as a secretary in the summer. And on a financial basis, how did your family do? Little plants. My older siblings say that they were often very hungry, but I didn't experience that sort of hardship. We seem to have food on the table. Those were paid. Where were your parents and the family living above-guarance stand? For what they earned? I would say they just scraped by. Do they strange? Because most of those that I see are people like your parents, but they have four or five big houses and they have no loans. They have no more. My father was always flashing money around, but he did not share that with his family. And I have had another sibling come forward to say that, and he lived just around the corner from us. And we have photographic evidence that my father was involved with his mother. To prove that my father had another family and possibly more families as well. So I think he was sharing his money between a number of households. It is very strange because often the children are dressed very expensively. In school, normally, they must see this. They must say how it's possible. The mother is home, and the father is both men. How is it possible? They are dressed with very expensive and fancy shoes and clothes, but everybody is keeping silent. That's something that comes back again. Then I was wondering if there has been DNA investigations on the crime scenes and searches. You say that you know where some bodies are from children, but they refuse also to investigate. I want two or three cases like this in Europe too, so it's not a surprise to me. The thing they do is making you as a victim complicit to, so you would shut up. What statement would you give to all these victim compliers now? There are accountable people like you, but they are not speakouts because they were forced in complicity to commit crimes themselves. What would you tell them? The only way to have a completely clear conscience is for them to come forward, follow the lead of others like myself who are speaking out regardless of the dangers. Just do it because it's worth it. It's worth it on a sole level. I can't say that I sleep well at night still. I still have nightmares, but I know that in my heart I'll try my best. More than your past. Don't you think, and that's maybe more a question for Chris Cleverley, that we should force to change the laws concerning victims that were forced to commit crimes so that they have the opportunity to come forward and help investigations to solution. There are those, of course, almost all the criminals have been in their childhood victims, and somehow we have to cut these circles, these vicious circles, otherwise it will never stop. But somehow, maybe I have to discuss this with Chris later, we have to find a way for these victims that became criminals and that speak out like you do to have other laws. Because some of them were victims, were compliant to crimes victims and criminals at the same time, but choose to become criminal. But those like you do, you you you preserved your soul and your consciousness, and you speak out. I think this is another matter. We should have laws to encourage people like you to be safe and to come forward to testify. This eye-gray crime, something has to be done to change the hope, the fear and silence. Yes, but also I think for people involved in the police, in the justice departments, they see, they know that things are wrong. But they are too afraid for their jobs. Well, yes, I'm sorry. What does your job mean against the death or the disappearance of the child? Oh God, I so much hope, Alex, it's really, I really do hope. Did you talk to the parents of the missing children about what you know about them? No, I did not. I didn't