LAS VEGAS 17: RECORD, FIREWORKS, TIMELINES, EXTREMES

Video Transcript:

everyone. Of course, you will all remember this video. This is the video that shows people leaving seconds before the shooting started. This is also the video that showed us a strange, shadowy figure running across rooftops within the venue. It is a very important document. I believe it shows us the initial phase of the operation, where they cleared out the concert venue through the use of faked panic and faked victims within the concert venue. Innocent people at the concert, hearing gunfire, and seeing scenes of panic, would through human nature, have joined the stampede for the exits. Where as we know, not everyone was convinced. But there is something else about this document that is very important. It is 15 minutes, 45 seconds, and 27 frames in length. It has the sound of the very first gunshot at 3 minutes and 11 seconds. To the very last gunshots, at 13 minutes and 6 seconds. 10 minutes of shooting. The audio sounds of every shot are within this video. Before we go any further, let me explain my thinking. If we have a full audio recording of the shooting, then we should be able to find out when a particular shooting event occurred that we see in other short videos. Let me explain through a demonstration. We are going to review two separate audio recordings of the same event. In this example, a small fireworks display held on a beach close to where I live. One of the videos is nearly 14 minutes long, and shows most of the display, without edits. The second clip is only 6 minutes long and has been edited to show the highlights of the display. Hi everyone and welcome to the Alkihuis. When we place both video clips into the editor, this is what we see. And by highlighting and extracting a key audio, each has such as a burst of gunfire or the final loud firework. We can begin to synchronize the audio. Once the audio from the two separate video files has been synchronized, and even though they are quite different recordings from separate locations, you can still see your visual correlation. In fact, the correlation and precision are so exact that the audio elements are now interchangeable between the two video files. To prove this point, here is a short clip with the video element from the first file and the audio element from the second file. And in this clip we have the audio element from the first file playing with the video element from the second file. As you can witness, the results are very exact. Recall that I said, one of these videos is not edited and is 14 minutes long. The other video is 6 minutes long and contains edited highlights. Using this synchronization technique, we can see where the edits were made, because the visual and audio elements between the two files are no longer synchronized and then they become synchronized, so somewhere in here, and edit was made. If we view this section of the file it is obvious to see. In the first half of the following clip, the sound and vision are not synchronized, and in the second half of the clip, they become synchronized again. Using a certain amount of time, dedication, and I would like to add a fair bit of patience. It is possible to take apart the 6 minute video and find out where each element resides on the full length 14 minute video. This technique is quite precise. I will also say that a fire works display is quite difficult, as it is a continuous wall of noise. It is much easier to extract sound events that are separated by time. Such as bursts of automatic gunfire, as we heard in Las Vegas. The first thing I did was extract all of the gunfire episodes that were audible in the 15 minute and 45 second video. Let us look and listen to a few examples. As you can see, with the audio events extracted, we can imagine this to be almost a barcode, or a key, in theory, all other videos of the Las Vegas incident that contains gunfire audio should fit somewhere within. And as we saw with the fireworks, the fidelity is so precise, we should be able to match up individual bullet sounds between videos. The first video on which I wanted to run a comparison was the famous taxi video. I used the 18 minute version of the taxi video. It begins almost immediately with the sounds of gunfire, indicating that the first moments of firing were not recorded on this video. We can hear different bursts of gunfire for approximately 5 minutes and 30 seconds, which I extracted. The increase in strength on the audio signal you can see, is when the passengers got into the taxi. This was approximately 9 minutes and 30 seconds after the start of the video. Let us listen to some of the audio events in the taxi video. you Now it sounds like it's coming from farther away. Something's going on. I'm right here by the porch of Manolet Bay and everything just seems to be normal here. I'm at the airport. I just talked to the metro police over here at the airport. All right. It sounds like it's coming from up there. Oh shit! My first surprise was when I discovered where the audio event was After the first bursts of gunfire. The sounds of gunfire we hear in the taxi are actually from the second half of the attack and even contain the very last burst of machine gunfire. It fits. Here. The next video I wanted to test was the one taken from the very top of the Mandalay Bay Hotel, with an overview, into the concert venue. It is not a very long video, at just under 3 minutes. But, there are still enough recorded gunfire events, that I was able to find its location in the time line. It fits. Here. I immediately thought this was very curious. It means that the taxi video, and the rooftop video, were started within 15 seconds of each other, approximately 4 minutes into the shooting. But surely, this was only a coincidence. The next video was recorded by Tony Gavilan, a Mexican gentleman across the street from the Mandalay Bay Hotel. The gunfire sounds recorded in this video. Fit here. At this point I began to feel very uneasy. This was starting to look far more than coincidental. I decided to move on to the videos recorded inside the venue. I have always found the following video one of the most upsetting. It appears to show a young female in mortal distress, with others around her, desperately trying to lend assistance in what seems to be a hopeless situation. The audio element of this file places it. Here, within the time line. What about the famous VIP box video showing the relaxed group of people? It fits. Here. For those of you who have been watching my videos, you know my theory about this event. But seeing this in front of me, started to make me feel sick, and I began shaking. How could it be possible that out of 22,000 people, of the very few videos we got, practically all of them, begin at the same moment, and with practically the same burst of gunfire? The odds of this happening, are beyond my ability to calculate. I sent out a request to fellow researchers, I wanted to find a video, that would connect the two halves of this event. It was suggested that I look at the clip used by CNN in their early reporting. And which I believe shows us part of Phase 1, the clearing out of the main concert crowd, through the use of crisis actors seated in the crowd, to so panic and fear. On the time line, that video fits, here. That last, I finally found a video that connects the first half of the shooting, to the second half of the shooting. It is the clip where somebody claims, that another person, has been electrocuted. But, there are problems. As you saw with the fireworks demonstration, this technique is very exact. But even though this clip is generally a good fit, it is not exact. And coincidentally, this clip ends right in the middle, in the same place all the other clips, begin. This is more. The double burst of gunfire this clip ends with, is not a match. The second audio component of the double burst of gunfire, is simply, missing. It was now fairly clear to me, that this central area of the timeline represented some kind of division. I just couldn't find a single video that spanned the dividing line, except the original video titled, Las Vegas Shooting? First actual shots. Rare. And then, thanks to an enthusiastic contributor to the YouTube comment sections, my attention was drawn to a video I had not seen. It is called, Las Vegas Shooting Video, venue to the airport, and it shows a large group of people, escaping from the concert venue, across open ground, and making their way to recover an international airport. The full video is 16 minutes long and was posted two weeks ago on the superb, Nick Vegas channel. It is a fascinating document, and it spans the division in the timeline. It also raises some extremely interesting questions. In the main timeline, it fit precisely, at this location. Here was a video, which at last, straddleed over, the central divide of time. But what it showed to my technical eyes, left my mouth open and my eyes wide, staring at the screen. These videos, could not be recordings of the same event, taken at the same time. Remember how precise this technique is. We are able to pick out, individual firework noises, in a chaotic firework display. We can see, that the key audio markers in the airport video, align practically perfectly, with the same audio events in the other videos. So how is it possible, that the sounds of gunfire are recorded at the beginning of the airport video, do not match the sounds recorded in the main reference video. This discrepancy, cannot be accounted for, by the speed of sound. Because, not only do the opening bursts of gunfire not match with the other video. If we do align them as best as possible, what it would actually mean, is that the following sounds of gunfire, would have arrived at the people near the airport, before the sound arrived at the concert venue. A physical impossibility. Now that I had a good selection of videos which I could compare to each other, I noticed more anomalies. There appears to be two missing bursts of gunfire in the main reference video, which do appear in all the videos that began their recordings after the halfway point. There was also a missing burst of gunfire in the airport video, but these missing gunfire events, did occur during chaotic and loud moments of the videos. Maybe the signal of gunfire had been lost in the noise. At around the time I was looking into these events, I was contacted by a fellow researcher, to have done some exemplary study into the first half of the taxi driver video. They said that after days of study into this video, they had been left with the distinct impression that the taxi driver video was a set up. A deception, to try and sell to us the idea that there were multiple shooters. A mysterious researcher suggested that I study the first half of the taxi driver video, very closely indeed. It was when I was looking at the video and audio tracks, in their collapsed state, that I noticed an anomaly, a series of gunfire bursts, not recorded on any other video. And these anomalous sounds were indeed, on the taxi video. Now it sounds like it's coming from farther away. Now it sounds like it's coming from farther away. The first burst of gunfire, is 13 rounds. Followed by a second burst, consisting of six rounds and four rounds. For a total cartridge expenditure of 23 rounds during approximately two and a half seconds of firing. Now it sounds like it's coming from farther away. These could not be the rounds, allegedly fired through the door, at Jose Campos. There are only 23 rounds fired, not the 200, initially claimed by the police, nor does it represent the amount of firing described by the engineer, Stephen Schuck. In which he describes ten seconds of firing he heard while walking up the hallway, and then several seconds of firing into the hallway after he had taken cover. And neither is walking 30 feet into the room, away from the broken window, going to change the sound of gunfire, from this to this. I suppose the police might be able to fool some people that get most of their news from the TMZ website, but I have news for them, there are people in this world with functioning brains. So, a possible question for the taxi driver, how did one record, what one described as, rounds of distant gunfire, that were not recorded, on any other videos from the Las Vegas incident, and where and how far away, do you think the sound emanated from? I do realize that this sounds crazy. But according to the data we are looking at a minimum, of three different versions, or if you prefer, three different dates, of this event, represented in the videos we see on YouTube. There are still many more videos to check and I will continue to do so. When I am done with this phase of my research I will be happy to hand out this file to anyone that wants it, all you will need is the appropriate, up to date, editing software to read the files. The videos are all public domain. And frankly, I will welcome a second opinion, we will discuss this at a late to date. As Barbaric and Repugnant as the Las Vegas incident was reported to be, was it supposed to be much, much, worse? With the numbers of dead recorded in the thousands. I extend great gratitude once again to my key fellow researcher, Irene, who has eyes so sharp that if she got a trip to the International Space Station, she could give the Hubble Space Telescope a run for its money. We are going into theory mode. If such thinking offends you please turn away now, it is not my intention to upset or offend anyone. But, I do believe there is circumstantial evidence that suggests what we saw at Las Vegas only represents a fraction of what was actually planned. This all began when researching videos for the timeline. When we came to review this video, Irene made an observation and connection that I still find staggering. And so we both started looking much harder. You will notice the woman lending assistance to the apparently mortally wounded lady laying on the floor. The woman lending assistance has long gray hair, a red bandana, and is wearing a dark blue tank top. What I found shocking when first viewing this video was the apparently mortally wounded female on the ground. Her pale face struck me like a fist device. A gut-renching scene. But Irene recognized the woman with the gray long hair and red bandana, she has seen her in several photographs. We will come back and review these photographs in a moment. Once again, we are going to return to the taxi and listen to what the passengers say. There are thousands of people dead and we just go by the way. Everybody is dead. Everybody is shot. And thousands of people dead. Oh my god, she is dead. They get people everywhere. There is thousands of people dead. Everybody is dead. Thousands of people are dead. Everybody is bloodied. Everybody is shot. Thousands. Hundreds and hundreds of people dead. Everybody is dead. There are dead people everywhere. Even the worst actor in the world, Triple D list no hope failures from California, even when trying to throw a few ad lib lines, should know the difference between 50 dead and thousands upon thousands of dead. Take the contents of a packet of playing cards and throw them on the floor, that is 50 dead. Now take the contents of 40 packets of playing cards and throw them on the floor, that is thousands and thousands. I can't help thinking that initially, the person was working from a different script. Speaking of scripts, the new video showing the escape from the venue to the airport, had a fascinating segment. At first it did look like they were escaping the venue, but, when escaping from gunfire, jumping over a wall will do, as will hiding behind a building, or under a car. I got the distinct impression when watching this video, that these people were not running away from something, I got the impression that they were going somewhere. Supposedly afraid of gunfire, they had no issue with walking across open ground right in front of the Mandalay Bay Hotel. Quite a risky step I would have thought under the circumstances, but curiously, when they got near the fuel tanks, one of the party made several mentions of them, and said people should stay away. It almost sounded like he was expecting them to explode. Sounds closer, but I think it's correct. It's outgoing off the thing, I think. Yeah, we're not really safe by those fuel tanks, dude. We have to have those fuel tanks. We don't know, I don't know. I think we should go back there. I don't know, just away from them fuel tanks. I don't know, just away from them fuel tanks. I haven't seen anything hit those. No, I haven't seen anything. I did see bullets hit the barn, but I think it's really good. How far up? When we were right when it first happened I heard a couple of fire crackers I thought. That's the battle's breaking matter. So, we have the passengers in the taxi, talking about thousands and thousands of dead. And we all know that supposedly the fuel tanks were actually fired upon. And for some reason, the supposed random escapee, even though he can hear machine-bound fire seems to be more worried about a couple of fuel tanks that can easily be avoided, and even the people around him sound surprised that he seems so concerned. They seem much more concerned with the bullets that are supposed to be flying around. So what does any of this have to do with the woman with the long grey hair and red bandana who was rendering assistance to the woman in the concert, with the deathly pale face? Let's go and have another look at those pictures. Did you notice anything? I must apologize. I have been playing a trick on you. My real question is this. Did you notice anything about the woman standing next to her? If I slightly enhance some of the color within the photo, do you see how unnaturally pale her face is, compared to her neck and arms? And she is not the only one in this photo with her hair scraped back and sporting an unusually pale complexion. In the world of heavy metal, specifically, death metal, this makeup effect is delightfully called, corpse paint. And it is used, obviously, to make the performing artists appear dead. Is there any other evidence that suggests that the Las Vegas incident was supposed to be much more violent and destructive than it was? Well, before the Q phenomenon we are aware of today, there was a presence on the 4chan forum known as, mega-anon, and like Q, this individual claimed to have inside information. More days after the Las Vegas incident, on October 5, mega-anon said, Same good dude also told you a much larger scaled attack was the initial intent, but was thwarted averted. Would have, in quotes, killed thousands. Trump tweeted it was a miracle using condescending quotes. The miracle was their plan to kill thousands more, was thwarted. Miracle was a fuck you, to my gabe. We are going to show you what was intended for Las Vegas, how extreme it was supposed to be, who coordinated it and why they did it. So why do I put any faith in what this post says? Because of what he posted in the message before this one. This will be your happening and you will never give a single fuck about North Korea. Again. How did this person know, six months ago? That this was going to happen, three weeks ago. So what was the first time you were in the city, you were in the city, you were in the city,