Finally! Someone in the MSM Exposes Bill Gates

Video Transcript:

Hey everyone, this is Derek Bros with the conscious resistance network and today we are going to continue our conversation about Mr. Bill Gates But before we do that, I want to remind you guys to bookmark my website Deconsciousresistance.com, which is what you're looking at right now This is the home for all of my content everything I've been producing over the last eight years You can download all my books for free here or purchase them. You can watch our documentaries for free or purchase them You can also follow us via our email newsletter which we really highly Recommend you guys sign up for the email newsletter. We're back to sending it out once a week now and with all the censorship going on It's more important than ever. Also follow me at float, follow me at mines. Join me on high sign up for my text list Guys, I cannot recommend this enough if you sign up for this text list right here You will get text every time I release a new video you can follow the conscious resistance telegram channel You can also follow us on library and bit shoot if you want to get our videos off of YouTube and finally you can support via patreon.com slash Derek Bros. All right, you guys know the drill. I've produced three different Articles a three-part investigation on Bill Gates. I helped push and launch the expose Bill Gates day back in June and then August and remember guys every second Saturday of every month It's coming up. Don't forget about it expose Bill Gates day and We've been labeled of course conspiracy theories. We've conspiracy theorists. We've been called far right You know people are trying to associate us with Q and on I know the Q and on crowd likes to talk about Bill Gates and all that but they don't talk about Trump's you know roll in a lot of these crimes and things But because of that we've had this association with the Q and on crowd and either way even if the Q and on crowd wasn't around Just for the fact talking about Bill Gates probably gonna get you labeled a conspiracy theorist because the mainstream has been totally Bought off by Bill Gates and this is what I pointed out in part one of my investigation My investigation was called Bill Gates's web of dark money and influence part one is called philanthropic narrative shaping and I go into here and cover Much of what was already reported in the mainstream honestly I just did a big a good job of bringing back all the information together and making it one cohesive piece But the Gates Foundation has followed the same Same trajectory as the Rockefeller Foundation and other you know billionaire philanthropists Quote-quote philanthropists before them who used their money and wealth to reshape their narrative and to make themselves look like a good guy And in the process more recently buying off all the media So I covered this back in when did this come out back in May and We launched Bill Gates day June August here. We are coming up to September and finally Somebody the mainstream is willing to say it check out this great piece here journalism gatekeepers This is coming from the Columbia journalism review now of course I want to say this doesn't mean I endorse everything on the Columbia journalism review But they are respected in the mainstream and the fact that this is published there Just under a week ago is a big thing and when you go to Twitter, which you will do in just a moment and You actually see the responses to this you see that people are in the mainstream are saying wow This is a great job great reporting by Tim Schwab and you know, so glad he did this which is Excuse me, which is a cool thing. I'm glad that they're responding but Just as a personal side it is a little annoying to be somebody in the in the independent media saying these things for years now and calling out people like Bill Gates And only once somebody in the mainstream club says it is it okay. It acceptable. It's no longer a conspiracy theory But either way, this is a great piece and it's too long for me to go over here I really hope you guys will do your own reading. I encourage more reading read read read read get educated But this one is as I said by author independent journalist Tim Schwab last August NPR profile Harvard led experiment To help low-income families find housing and wealthier neighborhoods giving their child access to better schools and an opportunity to break the cycle According to the researchers cited in the article these children could see 183,000 greater earnings 183,000 dollars of greater earnings over their lifetimes and it says if you squint as you read the story You'll notice that every quoted expert is connected to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Which helps fund the projects and if you're really paying attention You'll also see the editors note at the end of the story which reveals that NPR itself receives funding from the gates NPR's funding from gates quote was not a factor and why or how we did this story reporter Pam Fessler says Adding that her reporting went beyond the voices quoted in the article the story nevertheless is one of hundreds NPR has reported about the Gates Foundation or the work at funds including myriad favorable pieces from the Perspective of Gates or its grantees and that speaks to a larger trend an ethical issue with billionaire philanthropist bank rolling the news The broad foundation whose philanthropic agenda includes promoting charter schools at one point funded part of the L.I. Time L.A. Times reporting on education Charles Koch has made charitable donations to journalistic institutions such as the pointer institute which gates as well As well as to the news outlets such as the Daily Caller and the Rockefeller Foundation funds Vox's future perfect Which reports through the lens of effective altruism? And so you can see that this is not just gates though. It's the Koch brothers. It's the Rockefeller foundations continuing to fund this but of course Gates is a bit more of an outsized role as they right here. No where does this concern loom larger than the Gates foundation leading a leading donor to note Newsrooms in a frequent subject of favorable news coverage Now if you only read one thing just read this part here But please do read the whole thing. I recently examined nearly 20,000 charitable grants the Gates foundation has made through the end of June and found more than 250 million dollars going towards journalism recipients include news operations like BBC NBC Al Jazeera Pro Publica National Journal the Guardian Univision medium the financial times the Atlantic the Texas Tribune GANIT Washington monthly Limond and the Center for Investigative Reporting Charitable organizations affiliated with the news outlets like BBC Media Action and the New York Times is media's cases funded Media companies such as participant whose documentary waiting for Superman supports Gates's agenda on charter schools Journalistic organizations such as the Pulitzer Center on Crisis reporting the National Press Foundation the International Center for Journalists and a variety of other groups creating news content And an ad agency that Gates commissioned to create a quote news site to promote the success of aid groups Which is basically just marketing and propaganda in some cases recipients say they distributed part of the funding as Subgranced other journalistic organization which makes it difficult to see the full picture of Gates's funding into the fourth of state a K.A. Media Now that is alone right there of just highly disturbing I mean all those different outlets we just mentioned these are not kind of in consequential outlets This is from Le Mans in France washed and monthly medium the Guardian BBC NBC Al Jazeera So this is a global thing Center for Investigative Reporting people who are supposed to do investigative reporting and Again, I want you to read this guys because I've covered some of this in my own reporting But it's good to see it getting covered in the mainstream. Let me just read you one more paragraph during the pandemic news outlets Have widely looked to Bill Gates as a public health expert on COVID Even though Gates has no medical training and is not a public official. I'm glad he made that clear Paul Politifact and USA today run by the pointer institute and Janet respectively both of which have received funds from the Gates Foundation have even used their fact checking platforms to defend Gates from false quote-unquote false conspiracy theories and misinformation like the idea that the foundation has Financial investments in companies developing COVID-19 vaccines in fact that is true The foundation's website and most recent tax forms clearly show investments in such companies such as Gilead and Kiervaks in the same way that the news media has given Gates an outsize voice and the pandemic The foundation has long used its charitable giving to shape the public discourse on everything from public Global health to education to agriculture a level of influence that has landed Bill Gates on Forbes list of most powerful people in the world The Gates Foundation can point to important charitable accomplishments over the past two decades like helping drive down polio Also injuring kids with the oral polio vaccine and Putting new funds into fighting malaria, but these efforts have drawn expert detractors who say that Gates may actually be Introducing harm or distracting us from important life-saving public health projects like I don't know clean water rather than vaccines From virtually any of Gates is good deeds Reporters can also find problems with the foundations outsize power if they choose to look But readers don't hear these critical voices in the news as often or as loud as Bill and Melinda's News about Gates these days is often filtered through the perspective of many academics nonprofits and think tanks that take Gates's funds Sometimes it's delivered to readers by newsrooms with financial ties to the foundation I mean, this is an amazing piece that again, it's being mentioned in the mainstream This is not like brand new. We've all said this, but you know does give you a little bit of a good feeling to see somebody in the mainstream willing To step up and thankful that the Columbia Journalism Review actually published this the Gates Foundation declined multiple interview requests for this story And would not provide its own account enough how much money it has put towards Journalism So it offers some quotes, but you know, we're not gonna read those And yeah, it goes on and on. I mean This is a really in-depth piece. I just want you to go through and read this make the time today Like it's it'll take you 20 minutes to get through this. It's important information share it with your friends and family From the Columbia Journalism Review. This is not a conspiracy page. This is mainstream news journalism's Gates keepers Now as I said the author is Tim Schwab and freelance investigative journalist based in DC and the only this is the only piece He's published for the Columbia Journalism Review, but you might have recognized His name because as I said I did reference his work in my article here where he wrote in the nation the nation magazine So and this is one of the great things he mentioned here about the just let's just cover this from my article Which was sourced by Tim Schwab when he wrote this in the nation Let's take for example the Netflix documentary inside Bill's brain decoding Bill Gates Rather than being a genuine look at the life and personality of Gates the documentary failed to acknowledge conflicts of interest Which might portray the film and Bill Gates in a different light and a recent explosive investigation examining the reach of Gates's money The nation noted that quote in the first episode director David Davis Guggenheim Underlines Gates expansive intellect by interviewing Bernie Noe Described as a friend of Gates no goes on to tell of Gates reading 150 pages an hour with 90 percent retention He's just bragging about how smart Gates is however the nation reported Guggenheim doesn't tell the audiences that Noe know it the guy who's bragging about Bill Gates's IQ Is the principle of lakeside school which is a private institution to which Bill and Melinda Gates have given 80 million dollars to and this is the same school that the Gates children Also attend so think about that they created a documentary they got some director Interviewing a guy going on about oh my god Bill Gates reads 150 pages an hour 90 percent retention But they don't tell you that guy's given but received 80 million dollars from the Gates and That their kids go to his school the school that he happens to be the principal of that's just an example of some of the conflicts of interest And that's the more surface level stuff and that of course was uncovered here in this piece from Tim Schwab the same guy writing this new article And I believe he he his investigation into the Gates Foundation was part of a 2019 Allit Alicia Patterson Foundation fellowship So he probably got grant money to investigate them and that was published in March 17 2020 Bill Gates gives to the rich including himself I recommend both of these pieces by Tim Schwab. I will link them in the description below the video Again the new one journalism's Gates keepers published here in August and this one Bill Gates is charity part paradox back in March Those are both important pieces and I will also link to my Bill Gates pieces for those who haven't seen it because all of those together Will give you a clear image of who this guy is and one other thing I wanted to cover though because this is another mainstream article that just came out It's from the upcoming September 2020 issue of scientific American which is of course celebrating 175 years of being around and Very mainstream and often a gatekeeper of scientific information and trying to debunk things that are outside the paradigm But let's see what they have to say Jeffery Epstein's Harvard connections show how money can distort research letting the rich pay for science that interests them is a bad idea even if they aren't convicted sex offenders and it goes through here Talking about and this is again well worth your time it goes through talking about Jeffrey Epstein and his connection to Harvard and how much money he gave the psychology department how he gave to the program for evolutionary Dynamics and all the different areas that he was buying access to and putting money into the Harvard School for science and research and that's important right because I do think people You know it sucks that this happened after Epstein's allegedly dead and Maxwell's arrested because none of these people apparently had a conscience before them They didn't care about taking this sex offender this petafile this child abusers money before we all knew about his crimes and money of us knew about it And we were saying like hey, why is Harvard still taking his money? But now that it became mainstream people are like oh my god I didn't really as we were taking Epstein's money my bad they all knew and let's just do a quick control F here because we're talking about people taking money from Epstein right and It's not a good idea to let the rich pay for science that interests them well We let gates pay for Research into vaccines that interests him and that he makes a profit off of so he seems to fit the bill Oh, and coincidentally he was friends with or at least an associate with Epstein, but You guys see this I don't know if you can see it on screen. I'm control F in gates and there's nothing Gates is not even mentioned in this whole article here and This person about the author Naomi or Eskis Professor of Earth and planetary sciences at Harvard University. Does she have any connections to gates? I don't know I haven't really looked into this is a short little piece you can read it But my point is like you write this little article here Talking about Epstein giving money and how billionaires shouldn't be allowed to influence science and there's not even a mention of gates Who is one of the biggest proponents and influencers of scientific research with his foundation as well as profiting off that research with his Stox and various companies and Was an Epstein associate and there's not even a mention of gates as influence So just to kind of compare and contrast here's mainstream reporting on gates from the Columbia journalism review And again, this is not a defense of the Columbia journalism review just an example and then here's another example of mainstream reporting on Jeff Reapstein Harvard and rich people of flinting science and not even a single mention of Bill Gates not surprising But I wouldn't be surprised either to find out if Bill Gates has funded Scientific American or some of their associates that would be something else good to find out So I just wanted to check in with you guys and share that with you one positive note somebody in the mainstream is actually speaking up Shout out to Tim Schwab and as I did say I guess we'll do this real quick if you go to Twitter and you check out Tim Schwab You can actually see how much support he has been getting and Like I said, this is not just like people like us saying hey Tim that would welcome to the club He's getting lots of mainstream support. He doesn't have a huge following But he's getting lots of mainstream report. There's his article. I've actually sent him a request for an interview to see if he'll talk to me NYU education professor posted a take on my article and And you know, it's just going on people are responding now people are writing their own responses To his article as far back as 2016 Leonie contacted New York Times about undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in its reporting on the Gates foundation She got no response. So they're just they're calling people out now This is great to see that people are sharing his this Tim Schwab just keeps retweeting it and And his bill gates buying friendly journalism Tim Schwab once again afflicks the powerful. I mean like again. We've been saying this for a while But you know, I'm glad Tim Schwab's out there doing it. So you know, it's good to see as you can see There's all these retweets and these are not just conspiracy theories These are mainstream people doctors influential people in organizations who are actually starting to ask a question and this is important So I don't really care. Yes, it's annoying when we get called conspiracy theorists when we talk about something and it only gets accepted Once it's in the mainstream but at the end of the day If it brings down Bill Gates and people like him then I don't really care who gets the credit Let's bring down these people. It's exposed them for what they really are They're manipulating our world and Bill Gates is doing it through media He's also doing it through his philanthropy and his goal is not to save the planet He does not care about it. He is not some nice kind guy who's just doing this out of the kindness of his heart He has other intentions and those intentions are exposed in my Bill Gates investigation my three-part investigation So I hope you guys will link look at the links and see the Columbia journalism review go back and maybe read the nation piece I'll throw in this scientific American piece and then I'll throw on a link to my Bill Gates investigation You guys can get educated on this if you haven't yet and just one reminder Second Saturday of the month. So the second Saturday of every month is exposed Bill Gates day Let me think of my head first second third fourth fifth So six seventh eighth ninth tenth that'll be September 12th cool Maybe you can tie in your 9-11 activism with some exposed Bill Gates day, but September 12th second Saturday of the month Hashtag exposed Bill Gates day. Let's keep it going guys He's wounded right now. We can keep exposing him now You have a tool that is not a quote unquote conspiracy theory website to share with your friends take advantage of that Share the Columbia journalism article with your skeptical friends who think Bill Gates is a good guy We're gonna leave it there for now until next time remember you are powerful you are beautiful and you are free peace