Corbett Report: The Future of Vaccines

Video Transcript:

Since the dawn of the corona crisis, we have been told over and over that the world has changed forever. What we're going to have to figure out and I think what we're all going to have to figure out together is what our new normal looks like. Our new normal includes physical distancing from others. Our new normal includes wearing masks where appropriate. Our new normal includes us knowing where this virus is each and every day where we live, where we work, where we want to travel. What we've gone through and the challenge is that I'm sharing with you really is Arizona's new normal and it's our new normal for the foreseeable future. I really want to ask people to get their heads around that. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change. This new normal with which we are being threatened brings with it great uncertainty, uncertainty over work, uncertainty over travel, uncertainty over what our lives will look like on the other side of this great reset. But there is one thing that we can be certain about. If the gates and the fouches and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. It is fair to say things won't go back to truly normal until we have a vaccine that we've gotten out to basically the entire world. Realistically, COVID-19 will be here for the next 18 months or more. We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications. The hard fact is until we find a vaccine going back to normal means putting lives at risk. This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed. As I said, normal, it will not be. At least until we had herd immunity and we have a vaccine. So if we get the overwhelming majority of people taking the vaccine and you have on the one hand an effective vaccine on the other hand a high degree of uptake of the vaccine, we could start getting things back to relative normal as we get into the second and third quarter of the year where people can start thinking about doing things that were too dangerous just months ago. The only thing that will really allow life as we want to do it to resume is a vaccine. This message has been repeated so frequently and so consistently by public health officials, political leaders and media commentators that many have begun to believe it. And now the public is being prepared for an unprecedented global vaccination campaign taking the form of a military operation. It is this effort that I can look you in the face and say to you EUA comes 24 hours later vaccines will be distributed out to the American people and be ready for administration. The plan is to rush a new generation of experimental vaccines to market and deliver them at warp speed before any long term testing has even been attempted. What many do not yet understand however is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-CoV-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And as radically different as these vaccines appear they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of the future of vaccines. You're tuned into the Corbett report. For almost the entirety of 2020 a traumatized public has been told that nothing resembling our pre-coron alive will return until there is a COVID vaccine. So it is no surprise that the same media sources that have been promoting this talking point would celebrate the hopeful pronouncements of the big farm of manufacturers regarding their COVID vaccine candidates. Welcome back to Squawk Box everybody we have some breaking news from Pfizer. Meg Tarell joins us right now. Meg good morning. Good morning, Vicki. This is the news that we've been waiting to hear Pfizer and biontak reporting the first results from their phase three vaccine trial saying that in this interim look the vaccine will be distributed. The vaccine showed to be more than 90% effective. Well, we begin with breaking news this morning the push defined a coronavirus vaccine this morning Moderna says its vaccine is more than 94% effective. Vaccine headlines are rolling in. One of AstraZeneca's doses stopped an average of 70% of patients from falling ill and that even rose to 90% with additional regimens. Now the head of the government's operation warped speed is saying that quote hopefully vaccinations in the US will start in less than three weeks. But lost amid the hype of this media led celebration are some sobering facts. Firstly, these news stories were not generated on the back of publicly accessible data but literal corporate press releases. This announcement by press release style of corporate self reporting was immediately exposed as a sham when AstraZeneca was found to have given an unintentionally lower dose to one group of trial participants and then touted the results of that smaller dose group without clarifying the confusion. I'm not really sure what to make of this AstraZeneca Oxford trial. There's confusion about whether it's 60% efficacy, whether it's 90% what exactly happened? Well, it is a little bit unclear but let's start with what we think we know which is some of the patients that were in their phase three clinical trial ended up getting a half dose of the initial inoculation. And it turns out that the group that got that half dose followed by a boost had a much higher rate of protection from COVID-19 disease than the group that got the dosing schedule that the company wanted to give to everybody. Secondly, the success of these vaccines is not being measured by their ability to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 as many in the general public believe but merely to lessen the severity of the symptoms associated with COVID-19 like costs and headaches. Do you anticipate that the first sets of vaccines out the door will be more of a less effective blocker of the virus? Well, that's the primary, it's a great question and that's the primary endpoint of most of the virus is to prevent clinical disease, to prevent symptomatic disease, not necessarily to prevent infection. Thirdly, the studies are touted as involving tens of thousands of people but in Pfizer's trial only 170 of them were reported as being diagnosed with COVID-19 during the trial. Of those 162 were in the placebo group and 8 were in the vaccine group. From this it is inferred that the vaccine prevented 154 of 162 people from developing the disease or 95%. But as even the British medical journal points out, a relative risk reduction is being reported not absolute risk reduction which appears to be less than 1%. Fourthly, the trials are still ongoing. Although several countries have now issued emergency use authorization allowing these companies to begin distributing these vaccines to the public, the stage 3 trials of the vaccines are ongoing with several of the planned endpoints for the data not being collected for 24 months after injection. As a result, as even the UK's own information for UK healthcare professionals pamphlet regarding Pfizer's vaccine points out, animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed, meaning that it is unknown whether the vaccine has an impact on fertility. Even more chillingly, it is not healthcare professionals who are leading the charge to deliver this vaccine to the world, but the military. He commanded Canada's NATO mission in Iraq. Now he's in charge of making sure Canadians get the COVID vaccine. Major General Danny Fuchten will be heading up the logistics and operations within the center. Operation Warp Speed is a Department of Defense CDC operation to distribute 300 million vaccines to the US. As soon as the FDA authorizes an emergency use, if they choose to do so, we will move vaccine to all jurisdictions within 24 hours. We're about to turn the corner here into 2021. I think the American public should be very proud of what the Army and the Department of Defense and our partners on the science side have done to bring these vaccines to the market. How much more involved the military will get is unclear. Public health is still developing its plan. Defense Minister Harjit Sajan acknowledges it is not beyond the realm of possibility. In some parts of Canada, troops could be running clinics and administering vaccine. And most importantly, as incredible as this headlong rush to push an experimental vaccine on the majority of the world's population is, it is even more incredible when it is revealed that Moderna and Fuchten are not in fact vaccines as anyone in the general public understands them. They are mRNA vaccines, a novel method of vaccination that has never been approved for human use. So the concept of an RNA vaccine is let's inject the RNA molecule that encodes for the spike protein. It's making yourself do the work of creating this viral protein that is going to be recognized by your immune system and trigger the development of these antibodies. Our bodies won't make a full-fledged infectious virus, they'll just make a little piece and then learn to recognize it and then get ready to destroy the virus if it then later comes in and bates us. It's a relatively new, unproven technology and there's still no example of an RNA vaccine that's been deployed worldwide in the way that we need for the coronavirus. There's the possibility for unforeseen adverse effects. So this is all new territory, whether it would elicit protective immune response against this virus is just unknown right now. To be sure, the new mRNA vaccines work on an entirely different principle than any other vaccine that has ever been used on the human population. In order to understand that, it is important to understand the history of vaccine technologies. The concept of inoculation has been around for centuries, with one of its earliest known instances in China several centuries ago, where dried out scabs of lightly infected smallpox sufferers were powdered and then blown up the nostrils of healthy people. The procedure aimed to infect the patient with a mild strain of smallpox, thus conferring immunity on them. This practice was brought over to Europe via Turkey and was eventually adopted around the world. Vaccination developed in the late 18th century when Edward Jenner discovered that those who had been exposed to cowpox, a less virulent relative of smallpox, were themselves immune from smallpox. He vaccinated a boy with a cowpox vesicle from a milk made and then inoculated him with smallpox two months later. The boy did not develop smallpox and the procedure was hailed as a breakthrough of medical science. The term vaccination, derived from the Latin word for cow, eventually came to refer to the general process of introducing immunogens or attenuated infectious agents into the body in order to stimulate the immune system to fight infections. But this is not how mRNA vaccines function. In contrast to vaccination, which involves introducing an immunogen into the body, mRNA vaccines seek to introduce messenger RNA into the body in order to trick that body's cells into producing immunogens, which then stimulate an immune response. mRNA needs to reach the cytoplasm of host cells, while DNA needs to enter the nucleus. Then this genetic material gets taken up by the cell's machinery and the cell expresses the spike protein. These spike proteins are then recognized by the immune system, hopefully stimulating a protective response. So the way this is going to work, the mRNA vaccines, is it's the mRNA that codes for that coronavirus spike protein. You're inoculated with that small little piece of genetic material. That genetic material then enters your cells and is translated into a protein. In this case, the coronavirus spike protein, which is then excreted from the cells. So in essence, your body makes this spike protein and then your body makes antibodies to this spike protein. All because it's been instructed to do that, your cells have been instructed to do that by this little piece of messenger RNA. Protein factories in the cytoplasm, called ribosomes, bind to the messenger RNA. The ribosome reads the code in the messenger RNA to produce a chain made up of amino acids. There are 20 different types of amino acid. Transfer RNA molecules, carry the amino acids to the ribosome. The messenger RNA is read three bases at a time. As each triplet is read, a transfer RNA delivers the corresponding amino acid. This is added to a growing chain of amino acids. Once the last amino acid has been added, the chain folds into a complex 3D shape to form the protein. Any and all questions about this rushed experimental vaccine technology are being labeled by the pharmaceutical manufacturers and the corporate press that runs on their advertising dollars as anti-vax misinformation and being actively censored. But despite the straw man argument that opposition to the vaccine comes solely from ignorant members of the public who are worried about being injected with microchips, there are genuine concerns about the long term safety of these vaccines coming from within the scientific community and even from whistleblowers from within the ranks of the Big Pharma manufacturers themselves. On December 1st, the former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, joined Dr. Michael Yeeden, a former vice president and chief scientific officer at Pfizer Global R&D. To file a petition calling on the European Medicine Agency to halt the phase three clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine until they are restructured to address critical safety concerns associated with this experimental technology. There is a petition now to try and stop the vaccine from being released in Europe and stop the trials in their tracks until some serious errors are fixed. The complaints are the dangers of the potential dangers if they are not rectified of this vaccine. Let me very quickly just read through these before I bring on my next guest. Here are the four major elements that are being pointed out by Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeeden. The formation of so-called non-routralizing antibodies can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction especially when the test persons confronted with the real wild virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification ADE has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines and cats, for example. In the course of these studies, all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. That's problem number one, problem number two. The mRNA vaccines from Biontech and Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol, P-E-G, 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance. This means that many people can develop allergic potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination. Number three, the vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin, homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1 as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. And then lastly, the much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases, after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk. If an emergency approval were to be granted in the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow, nevertheless, Biontech Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020. We've just updated you that that vaccine has been approved for the UK as we speak. What is it that people can do? What are your fellow scientists and doctors? What do we need to do to make sure we don't make one of the greatest scientific errors that we have? What are your numbers in human history? Protect yourself and protect all your neighbors and friends so that they don't get this vaccine. And you have to be, to show up, you have to tell the politicians that you will blame them for what they do with us. I think what's happening, it's great betrayal. We are betrayed. And people who will be betrayed and they normally are punished. And we won't forget this if they go on doing this with us. Before the combined weight of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, global health bodies, governments, and the corporate media, combined to suppress any questions about this unprecedented rush for a globally distributed, experimental vaccine, there were widespread calls for caution from within the heart of the scientific community. Even mainstream publications like Scientific American were compelled to note back in June of this year that there are reasons for concern over the way the COVID-19 vaccines are being rushed to market. Telescoping testing timelines and approvals may expose all of us to unnecessary dangers related to the vaccine. While preclinical trials to evaluate the potential safety and efficacy of vaccine candidates are likely to include tens of thousands of patients, it is still unclear whether that number will be large enough and a trial will last long enough to evaluate safety for a drug that would be administered to so many. The US alone plans to vaccinate hundreds of millions of people with the first successful candidate. One serious adverse event per thousand of a vaccine given to 100 million people means harm to 100,000 otherwise healthy people. The potential dangers of these vaccines, not just the mRNA vaccines that hijack your body's cells to begin producing proteins to stimulate an immune response, but vaccines like AstraZeneca's that use as a chimpanzee add an a virus to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are numerous. Not only do these vaccines present the potential for the antibody-dependent enhancement phenomenon that makes people more susceptible to the wild virus after having been vaccinated against it, which is a problem common to previous coronavirus vaccine candidates, but their potential impact on fertility has, even by the UK government's own admission, not been tested at this point and remains unknown. But even more fundamental than these particular safety concerns about these particular vaccines is the way that this fanatical, reckless and unprecedented headlong rush to push, and potentially even mandate these vaccines on billions of people worldwide. Women and children, young and old, healthy and unhealthy alike, is setting the most dangerous public health precedent in the history of humanity, a precedent that threatens to undermine our most cherished health freedoms in the name of a panic-induced emergency. One of these core freedoms is the ability to refuse an experimental medical procedure, a freedom that was acknowledged in the Nuremberg Code of 1947, and enshrined in the international covenant on civil and political rights, which states that no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. Despite the fact that the clinical trials surrounding these experimental vaccines are ongoing, and that the FDA itself admits that there is currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine and subpopulations, such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals, and risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown. Governments around the world are contemplating making these vaccinations mandatory, or compelling people to take them against their will by restricting their access to public life until they subject themselves to this medical experimentation. It's a controversial idea that could end up being the law, no jab, no job, with some businesses considering making the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for employees. There may be some restrictions that may be placed on people that don't have vaccines for travel purposes to be able to go to theaters and other places, but that will be up to the individual person to decide. So here's how it works. The app gives you a health passage show before you go into big stadiums like this to streamline the process, to make it safer and faster for you to get to your seat. Alan, when there is a vaccine, are you going to require all of your passengers to be vaccinated before they get on a plane? Yeah, we are looking at changing our terms and conditions to say for international travelers that we will ask people to have a vaccination before they can get on the aircraft. The threat of forcing or compelling people to become unwilling guinea pigs in an ongoing medical experiment is immoral on its face. But even the prospect of enforcing such mandates would entail the erection of a surveillance and tracking system that further threatens basic rights and liberties. After all, in order to determine who has been vaccinated and thus who is allowed to board an airplane or access a stadium or enter a store with a vaccine policy, there will need to be a system for identifying and tracking each vaccine recipient. Whereas in days past, such tracking systems might have worked with identification papers, special badges to identify people's status or other outwardly identifying marks. In the modern age, such schemes will take the form of digital apps and other technologically advanced methods for tracking, categorizing and identifying billions of people and their movements in real time. There are already apps like IBM's digital health pass and Clear's health pass that envision a world where our biometric ID will be linked via our smartphones to our health data in order to grant or deny access from public spaces and public events. Jane opens the Clear app and verifies her identity with a photo and real time health insights. Clear's developed touchless technology can take her temperature and confirm Jane is Jane so she can walk in with confidence. Your COVID-19 status will efficiently display as green, amber or red, dependent on your test results. This allows us to go about our daily activities in a safer way, where we can all use health passport Ireland in many ways, such as travel, hospitality, education, health care, construction, offices, entertainment, visits, and much more. Once the COVID vaccines are widely distributed, it would simply be a question of linking one's vaccination record to the health pass app to prevent the unvaccinated from accessing any given space. And while this future, sold through glossy corporate advertising but rejected by the vast majority of the public, may seem like a science fiction dystopia, such systems are already being used to control the movements of people in China, where access to certain buildings or the ability to leave one's own neighborhood can be restricted to those whose phone-based apps show a green immunity status. Worse, the COVID vaccine presents governments, intelligence agencies and corporations that have a direct interest in suppressing dissent, monitoring dissidents and controlling their populations, with the perfect opportunity to make such systems a permanent fixture of daily life. After the immediate threat of the declared public health crisis subsides, the public is already being warned that these apps will be transitioned seamlessly into general monitoring of the population. During the summer spying Palm Beach County launched something called a Combat COVID app. They spent a huge chunk of CARES Act money to do it. The app can alert you if you come into contact with a COVID positive person. The problem is it only works if there's widespread use and there isn't. So was this just a big waste of money? Palm Beach County officials would not make anybody available for an interview for this story, but I did get a written statement from a county spokesperson who tells me they will still have use for this app even after the pandemic is over. He says they plan on transitioning its functions to be a more general community app. As chilling as these immunity passports opening the door for governments to implement persistent digital tracking of their entire population is, it represents only the most visible privacy invasion that is being enacted on the back of this unprecedented vaccine rollout. As viewers of the Who Is Bill Gates documentary will know, these smartphone apps and voluntary reporting mechanisms will eventually be replaced by an even more invasive technological means of certifying vaccines. Not the microchip straw man that the fact checkers used to attempt to debunk these concerns, but the verifiable existence of a program to develop quantum dot tags to instantly identify who has received a given vaccine. Late last year Gates once again turned to Robert Langer and his MIT colleagues to investigate new ways to permanently store and record the vaccination information of each individual. The result of their research was a new vaccine delivery method. They found that by using dissolvable microneedals that deliver patterns of near infrared light emitting micro particles to the skin, they could create particle patterns in the skin of vaccine recipients, which are invisible to the eye, but can be imaged using modified smartphones. Rice University describes the quantum dot tags left behind by the microneedals as something like a barcode tattoo. So who was behind this development? As lead researcher Kevin McEw explains, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation came to us and said, hey, we have a real problem knowing who's vaccinated. So our idea was to put the record on the person. This way later on, people can scan over the area to see what vaccines have been administered and give only the ones still needed. Experimental vaccine technologies, rushed testing, mandates and health apps, and eventually quantum dot tags and biometric IDs. The future that is coming into view on the back of this COVID nightmare is truly dystopian. But as worrying as all of this is, the most worrying aspect is the precedent that it sets for a new era of biosecurity, an era in which public health authorities will claim to have the right to force rushed, untested and experimental technologies on the public in the name of public health. At the moment, these new technologies, like mRNA vaccines which reprogram cells to produce antigens, or the DNA vaccines that seek to insert genetic material directly into the cells nucleus, and that even biotech giant Moderna admit have a risk of permanently changing a person's DNA, are still understood by the public as vaccines. But they bear as little resemblance to the vaccines that have previously been given to the public as Edward Jenner's cowpox vaccine bore to the old Chinese art of blowing smallpox scabs up the nose. And the medical technologies that are emerging now will once again utterly transform our understanding of vaccines. One such technology is being actively developed by Profusa Inc, a company that in 2016 received a $7.5 million grant from DARPA, the research and development agency of the US military, to develop implantable biosensors that can continuously monitor multiple body chemistries. Earlier this year, Profusa announced a study that will examine how the company's technology, including a wireless reader that adheres to the skin and collects and reports tissue oxygen levels, and a 3-millimeter string of hydrogen, which can be inserted under the skin with a syringe and program to send a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection. It can be used to develop an early identification system to detect not only disease outbreaks, but biological attacks and pandemics up to three weeks earlier than current methods. The study is expected to be completed next year. Hydrogels, networks of cross-linked polymer chains, are increasingly being turned to by proponents of these new technologies as potential delivery devices for drugs, cells, proteins, and bioactive molecules. In 2013, for instance, a team of European researchers announced a novel method for injecting a vaccine containing hydrogelsphere to a spot beneath the skin, which could be released at a later time by swallowing a stimulus responsive biohybrid material. Towed it as a remote-controlled vaccine delivery system, the researchers proved their concept by injecting mice with a hydrogel containing human papilloma virus vaccine, and later giving them a pill containing fluoresceine, which dissolved the hydrogel mesh and released the oxygen-free hydrogen. The research on this vaccine delivery method continues, with a Chinese team publishing research just this year on a self-adjuvanted hydrogel which had both adjuvant potential and the ability to sustain release antigen. As viewers of the Who Is Bill Gates documentary will know, the idea of implanting remote-controlled vaccines in large populations has been around since at least 2012, when, according to MIT Technology Review, Bill Gates personally asked MIT researcher Robert Langer to create an implantable birth-control device that could be turned on or off remotely. The resulting device, a wireless birth-control microchip that, as the National Post noted in 2014, can be turned on and off with a remote control and that is designed to last up to 16 years, was developed by microchips biotech, now part of Dara bioscience, and has so far received 17.9 million dollars in grant funding for the first time in 2014. From bioelectronics to nanorobotics to synthetic biology, ever more incredible technologies are being pioneered that, whether or not they are marketed to the public under the catch-all term of vaccine, will operate in ways that are fundamentally unlike anything before used on the human population. University of Ottawa researchers are working on creating edible vaccines. Researchers at Harvard Medical School are developing autonomous DNA nanorobots capable of transporting molecular payloads directly into cells. A team of scientists at Johns Hopkins University are working on shape-changing micro-devices called Theragrippers that can reside in the GI tract to aid in extended drug delivery. Nanobots, shape-changing bio-electronic devices, remote-controlled vaccines, this is not the stuff of science fiction, but of science fact, and the precedent that is being set during the COVID era to rush experimental and unproven medical technologies into use on the back of a declared crisis is the same precedent that could be used to voice these injectable technologies on the public in the future. And, as Catherine Austin fits, former United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and Founder of Celari Inc explains, these injectables are part of an elaborate system of biological, economic, and political control that is being bankrolled into existence by powerful special interests. So let me go through where I think he's going. I think where they're going and they're prototyping tons of technology, so I don't think they have it yet. But where they want to go is they want to download a Microsoft Office system into your body, into your brain, and hook it up to the Jedi Cloud Contract and the Amazon Cloud Contract at the CIA. And if they can get 7 billion people hooked up directly to their Cloud Contracts and use viruses, I mean, it's very clever. Use viruses to keep those updates coming, just keep those updates coming. So you saw my most recent article, the injection fraud. I think it's a fraud to call these vaccines, they're not vaccines, they're not medicine. But I think it's the exact same model you used in the computers and the ideas, just like Bill Gates made it possible for the intelligence agencies to get a backdoor into our data and our computers, they want a backdoor into our mind. And it's very hard for if you haven't looked into the creepy technology, the Charles Lieber kind of technology, it's hard to found them. So what we have are people who have unimaginable liabilities for what they've done in the health area, what they've done in the financial area. And what they're trying to do is they're trying to do two things. One is to load an operating system into our bodies. I call it the injection fraud because they're calling it a vaccine and under law of vaccine is medicine. This is not medicine. So to me, what they're up to is a fraud. And then the second thing they're trying to do is implement contract tracing so they can have before they get the office of some everybody they can have complete control, you know, kidnapped you, put you in prison with no war and spraking your house, take your kids. And I keep saying to people, do you notice it's the people who flew up steam air who all want contract tracing, why is that? You know, why would you want the people who did the steam air to be able to come into your house and kidnapped your kids? Despite the protestations of those like Bill Gates who have a financial interest in these experimental vaccines and the big pharma corporations that are selling these vaccines and the governments that are being bribed by the international public health cartel to purchase these vaccines and pressure their public to accept them. And the corporate media who relies on these big pharma corporations for their advertising dollars, some facts about these novel coronavirus vaccines are indisputable. They are the most rushed vaccines ever developed. The manufacturers have been given total immunity from liability if their experimental vaccines cause injury. The clinical trials testing the safety of these injections are not finished, meaning that every member of the public who takes one is now a human guinea pig in an ongoing medical experiment with the population of the planet. The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are themselves part of an experimental class of injection that has never before been given to the public. These vaccines have not been tested for their ability to prevent infection or spread of SARS-CoV-2 and are not intended to do so. And there is absolutely no long term data about these vaccines to determine what their effects may be on fertility, the potential for pathogenic priming or any other serious adverse reaction. That this represents the most reckless and brazen experiment in the history of the world is undeniable on its face. Never before have billions of people been pressured to submit to a completely experimental invasive medical procedure on the basis of a disease with a greater than 99% survival rate. But large-scale emergency vaccination campaigns have been tried before, with sobering lessons about the danger of such a wide-scale experiment that are being deliberately ignored right now. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, hundreds of millions of people were injected with polio vaccines that, years later, were discovered to have been contaminated with SV-40, a cancer-causing virus found in the recess monkey kidney cells that were used to create the vaccine. In 1976, 12 soldiers at Fort Dix were diagnosed with swine flu. This kicked off a round of public health hysteria that led the US government to mandate that every citizen in the country be vaccinated. In the end, only one soldier at Fort Dix died of the swine flu, and no one outside of the base even tested positive for it, but the emergency immunization program went ahead. It was brought to an abrupt end after hundreds who had received the rushed vaccine began to display severe neurological disorders. Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the US government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation, and Washington decided that every man, woman and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a pandemic. Well, 46 million of us, so immediately, took the shot. And now 4,000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to $3.5 billion, because of what happened when they took that shot. By far, the greatest number of the claims, two-thirds of them, are for neurological damage, or even death, allegedly triggered by the flu shot. During the hysteria over swine flu in 2009, GlaxoSmith Klein rushed a vaccine called Pandemrix to market in several European countries that was later associated with increased risk of narcolepsy. Years later, it was admitted that the 2009 flu season was no deadlier than any other flu season, but the British Medical Journal revealed that the body that advised the WHO on the declaration of the public health emergency that caused governments to purchase billions of dollars of vaccines. The vaccine was itself populated by advisers with direct financial ties to the big farm of vaccine manufacturers. In each of these cases, the public was told to follow the science, and in each of these cases an unknown and perhaps unknowable number of people paid for that blind faith with their health. Now the revolver is once again being put to our heads, and with an assurance that that revolver probably contains a lot of empty chambers, the public is being asked to play Russian roulette in the name of trusting the science. I think we're in the middle of a massive experiment worldwide. Where's the guinea pigs? Maybe the experiment is, will people listen to scientists? Surely those who wish to be the test subjects in this ongoing experiment should be free to make themselves into guinea pigs for the big farm of manufacturers. But every mandate or compulsion to force the vaccine on an unwilling recipient sets a dangerous precedent, a precedent that will one day lead to a tracked and surveilled population unable to resist the next generation of injectable bioelectronics. This is not a game, this is not a test. Billions of people are being asked to participate in a gigantic experiment, not just an experiment in medical technology, but an experiment in compliance and blind trust. The pressure to say yes and to go along with the crowd in this experiment is enormous. But if we lose the freedom to say no to this, then we may lose control over our bodily autonomy, and ultimately our humanity, forever. The choice is ours, but for how much longer? The choice is ours, but for how much longer?