JIM FETZER "The Real Deal" (2-28-20) Dr.Lorraine Day discusses her world-view with Jim

Video Transcript:

This is Jim Fatser, your host on the real deal with another fascinating conversation with Dr. Lorraine Day, who has been among the most courageous and outspoken women of my life, of my acquaintance, where I have cited her time after time after time in relation to the Boston bombing for making the observation of the laws of physiology would be violated to have persons whose limbs have been blown off by explosives and there to be no blood, which is a story we were given in Boston. We zoom in through the smoke and you saw bodies lying there, missing arms and legs, but there was no blood. The blood only showed a blader and it came out of little orange fake blood kits because they were using amputee actors. So this I have admired her beyond words and I'm very fortunate to have the opportunity for us to have conversations. Lorraine, I'm just utterly absorbed by your take on things where you seem to have quite a command of the facts and the evidence and the history of many of the problems that can frame this nation today. Yes, well, we were just discussing the NOAA hide laws which most people in America have never even heard of. NOAA hide laws are supposed to be from either NOAA or Adam. Well, they are from neither. They are out of the Jewish Talmud and they are to the Jews believe that the Ten Commandments are for them and that the NOAA hide laws are for the Gentiles. So one of the NOAA hide laws says that it is a sin worthy of death to worship an idol. However, what you find out that the Talmud says that the worship of Jesus Christ is an idol and the article is in my new book called Who Started the Organized Church It Wasn't God. And the subtitle is for the first 4,000 years of human history, no one went to church, then what happened. And I put this article in there now that the government can legally kill Christians because it is on the books of the law books in America that the government can legally kill Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ. Because in the NOAA hide laws, the NOAA hide laws were affirmed way back. This was in 1991 that this law was passed. And in the Talmud it says that if you worship an idol, the Penaltheist death and an idol is identified, one of the idols is Jesus Christ. So that means... Certainly the image of a cross or a figure crucified upon a cross. You don't have to have that kind of an idol. You don't have to have a physical idol. That's if you worship Jesus Christ, that is idolatry because they say he was a fraud. So that is idolatry to them. And the Penalthe is death by beheading. Now if you think that this is wild, I want to tell you that I'm going to show this. This is the chapter in my book and it's written by my recently deceased husband, William Danomire, who was a long-term U.S. congressman from 1979 to 1992. He was in Congress the day this was passed. He was on the floor of the House of Representatives on the day this was passed. However, all the congressmen were told to go home that there would be no more votes and four stayed behind and passed this bill under the radar. And they prayed... Who was a speaker at the House at the time? His name was... I think it was Michael's. I'm not sure. The main one who was involved in the passing of this, one of them was the fellow who then became governor of Pennsylvania during 9-11. What was his name, Tom? Tom Ridge. Tom Ridge. Tom Ridge was the first head of Homeland Security. He was rewarded for all of these things by having passed this law. He was one of them. This is so on democratic and such a blatant violation of the First Amendment, which, of course, endorses not only freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but freedom of religion. You realize the Constitution hasn't been operative for decades. If you go into a courtroom, you will see there is fringe on the flag. Fringe on the flag means that we are under maritime law. The Constitution is not operative. Tell us about how this came to pass because I heard it suggest that numerous times... Yes, the world war, the world war, the world war, too. The Constitution was really suspended. We are under maritime law. And so that means that all of these things that the average American thinks are operative are not. But the real point is that the Illuminati owns everything. The Illuminati owns the media. They own the judiciary. They own the administration. Trump doesn't make the decisions. The decisions are made for him by the Council on Foreign Relations, the trilateral commission, the builder burgers, the club of Rome. They are the ones who make the rules. They are the ones who tell Trump and every other president what to do. And they are run by the Rothschilds in the city of London. So they have the whole thing all sewn up. And I should mention here is that we were talking before we started recording. The presentation dough and look at the Harold Rosenthal interview with Walter White. Harold Rosenthal was the administrative assistant of Senator Jacob Jabbits of New York. This interview was done in 1976. It's still on the internet. I suggest that you print it out because it will disappear sooner or later. And it tells exactly what the plan is for the whole world, which is now being implemented with the beginning of the coronavirus. What it says that they're going to do, which is here from the Frankfurt School, which is the Aluminati School, it says they're going to this was done way back in the 30s. This is the plan. The creation of racism offenses, continual change to create confusion. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children, the undermining of schools and teachers authority, huge immigration to destroy identity, the promotion of excessive drinking, the emptying of the churches, an unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of the crime rather than the criminals, creating dependency on the state and state benefits, control and are dumbing down of the media and encourage the breakdown of the family. Now these are only some of the things that they propose to do. And this was put together over a hundred years ago. Do you think they're doing it now? Of course they're doing it now. Every one of those things they are doing now. And people don't recognize this is all part of a plan. If you go to the January 10, 1963 congressional record, it says the 45 things that they are the communist goals. Well communism came right out of the townland. The Jewish townland is the holiest book of the Jews. That's where communism came from. And these are the communist goals. And it says promote homosexuality. These were put in the congressional record on January 10, 1963. All right, that's what, 60 years ago. So promote homosexuality as a normal, healthy alternative lifestyle. Buy the courts, get control of the schools, destroy the family. All of these same things that I just read to you were read into the congressional record in 1963 as the communist goals. They are now accomplishing them every single day in our life. People don't recognize that this is a huge plan. This is not they just get up to, oh look what they're teaching the children in school. Oh, oh look, they're telling lies about Sanding Hook. Oh, that's what they want to do is they want to keep everybody just harping on one little thing and not recognize the big picture. The big picture is the destruction of the Gentiles and the destruction of Christianity. Now I'm not talking about churchy entity. I'm not talking about churchy entity. I do not believe in organized religion because the Illuminati has invaded all of the churches as well. Protestant churches and Catholic churches so they don't understand what's really going on. I happen to be a Christian. I am not a church goer because I don't believe because the churches are turning everything upside down that Jesus Christ taught when he was on earth. 180 degrees. So those are churchy entity. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about true Christians. They have a red list and a blue list which you probably know about because you're on the red list. I'm sure. So am I. I've been on the red list for over 30 years. The red list is the list that they're going to pick up when they declare martial law. Take us to the camps and there are guillotines in all of the camps and they have the guillotines in there and they admit why they have oh by the way something I just learned in the last three weeks. Most people don't know what an ICD 9 code book is. An ICD 9 code book is put out by the United Nations and it has the diagnoses, all diagnoses that could ever occur in medicine. And every hospital and every doctor's office has an ICD 9 code book because that's how they do the charging for each diagnosis. Now they have an ICD 10 but it's the same thing. There is now something been added to the ICD 9 code book and I actually have the number of the code and it's going to be in my new book which is the working title is the New World Order, the extermination of humanity. And so the code is for beheading by guillotine. That has now been mainstreamed in the ICD 9 code book that is in every doctor's and hospitals. Tell me more, this is stunning. So there are guillotines again in all of them. How is it being endorsed? I mean, that's because you think the constitution is still operative. It's not. It's not. I mean, how does this you end up in endorsing? What do you mean how is it endorsed? It's in the ICD 9 code book and they tell you why they're going to guillotine them. First of all, it's the most frightening way to die for everybody looking on. Number one, to have your head cut off. And so that's the way they keep people under control by intimidating them and making them fearful. And the second reason is they said when they electrocute a person, it fries their organs so they can't use them as organ donations. And if they decapitate you, then all your organs are still okay. That's what they say. I've got their quotes. So they have your suggestions. The Illuminati who are promoting decapitation by guillotine is the way to go in order to harvest the organs of the disease. Yes, because they're going to guillotine hundreds of thousands of people. They have, I'm sure you've seen the absolute vast fields of coffins that are. Yes, I've seen these. Start down there. It's hard plastic coffins. It'll hold four bodies of piece to appear. It's already. Yes. Yes. And so. There are FEMA camps and then DHS is acquired over two billion rounds of hollow point ammunition, which you don't use for training purposes, but to rip bodies apart in fact it's devastating. It's proscribed by the rules of war that hollow point ammunition is not permissible under international law in armed combat. Well, that's right. But of course they ignore that too. The UN makes these laws. You will see that the UN has chastised Israel probably 900 times since they've been in existence, but nothing ever happens. It's a security council. Unfortunately, the US has exercised a veto on Israel's behalf time and time and time again. Well, what does that tell you? What does that tell you? That that I don't want to be crude, but the US is really Israel's bitch. The US is Israel's bitch. And what Netanyahu said, don't worry about the US. We control the US government. That's what Netanyahu said. There are aerial serones that. Well, America and the Americans. The US said that too. Don't worry about that. You got quite a few statements from Israeli PMs that are highly denigrated, but the United States and the US and the US are just a resource to be exploited and then thrown away what they have sucked us dry. Well, you do see, you did see what Henry Kissinger said about military men. You know, our military men, they're just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy. That's what he said. Because Israel does not want to lose their men and women in combat. So they use the US military. The US military. George W. Bush and, you know, used other people's money. The Bush family would invest other people's money to make them money just as he is Israeli, use other people's armed forces to benefit Israel, namely those of the United States, for which 9-11 was specifically designed to provide a pseudo-justification for US forces to enter the Middle East to take out the modern era of states that served as a counterbalance. Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually to confront the Persian nation of Iran. Well, of course, you know that Israel plans to expand its borders to what they say when the biblical borders, which is called Iraq's Israel. And then I actually have, let me see. The great rivers from the Niles and the Euphrates. Yeah, the greater Israel project. But they plan to, you know, we have the Iraqi embassy, the US embassy in Iraq, which is eight football fields long. And that's where they plan to rule the world from there. Because if you look at it, let me see if I have that. The world from the US embassy in Iraq, that's passing. I would have presumed it was from Jerusalem. No, no, they're going to see that will be Israel. That will be Israel. But you will see it's in the center with the extended borders of Israel. We'll be a country like this. On one side, we'll be Europe. On the other side, we'll be Asia. And then below it is Africa. And they will rule the world from there. Because that's the center of the world other than the United States and Australia. And they don't care about us. They just use us for their military arm. What you're describing as a Zionist vision for ruling the world. Well, it's, I don't know that it's Zionist, Zionist kind of softens it. It's Israel and the tribe, their plan to rule the world. Zionism, you see, there's Zionism and communism. And people don't realize that they're really one and the same. The average person in America thinks that Zionism is that the Jews have a right to their own country in Israel. The Jews view of Zionism as if they have a right to rule the world. Okay, so it's a very different view than they pretend to have. Well, there's several varieties of Zionism, but the strong one derivative from the Talmud combines Jewish superiority over the other races, which are supposed to be as inferior to the Jews as animals or to humans generally. The historical presumption to entitlement of the lands of Palestine and beyond, really basically from the Tigris Euphrates to the Nile. And we're talking about large chunk of Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, all of Jordan, all of Lebanon being subsumed in the greater Israel. I think that to be the strong, very lit version of Zionism, perhaps the most robust. Many Christian Zionists who hold what may be weaker versions about the Jews being entitled to the Promised Land and so forth, where of course, as you well know, contemporary DNA studies by John Hopkins has shown that actually the residents of Israel today are not descendants of the tribe of Judah, but rather their caiserians from the region now a part of Ukraine, which means they're not even Semis. Correct. Because the Palestinians are, which makes Israel impact, ironically, the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world. Right. Well, that's right. So the Ashkenazi Jews, which is the majority of Jews in the world are tasars, and they're actually Gentiles. They are Mongol barbarian Turks. So the Jews of today are actually Gentiles, masquerading as Jews claiming to be a different race. They are not Judaism. It's a culture. It is not a race. It is a culture and a religion that comes right out of Babylonian paganism. And so when the Israelites were taken captive to Babylon, it was a Pharisees that sort of at that time took over their religion. And their oral traditions, they brought back from Babylon in the Talmud, as you know, it says that a man can have sex with a three-year-old girl, and it is nothing. It is like poking a finger in her eye. A man can have sex with a nine-year-old boy and God approves. It says even the best of all the Gentiles should all be killed. It says that a Jew can kill a Gentile and God approves. But if a Gentile kills a Jew, he must be killed. It says that Jews cannot pay the wages of Gentiles who have even worked for them. It says they can lie and steal. Take everything from Jews. It also says that a Jewish doctor is not allowed to save the life of a Gentile unless the Gentiles are still so much in control that the Jewish doctor may get in trouble. Now they're talking about in Texas. There's an area in Texas right now that's having some sort of catastrophe flood or something. And they're making the people sign an anti-DDS agreement. In other words, they will not boycott Israel for them to get any aid in the flood or primers happening. This is just disgusting, Lorraine. I mean, it's absolutely unbelievable. It is so totally un-American. I mean, it's an evolved form of violation of the First Amendment right and subservient to Israel. I cannot believe this happens in the United States, but I know from your and other reports, in fact, it's taking place all too frequently across the country. We have not been living under the Constitution for a very long time. The other thing that people don't know is that Christopher Columbus was actually Jewish and all the people that came with him were Jewish and that the first nine slave ships that came from New England, eight of them were owned by Jews. So the Jews actually started black slavery. It was not the whites. It was the Jews who started black slavery. And I have an quote here from Maurice Samuel who wrote a book in the 20s or 30s called Eugeniles. It says, we Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own. And so that is the plan. And you can see that many, many different places. You can see it in the protocols of the elders of Zion. You can see it in this from the Frankfurt Jewish school. You can see it from the 1963 January 10 congressional record. You can see it in many of these blueprints for what they plan to do. So America at the very beginning, if you look at the map of Washington, DC and I have that in one of my books that I've written, I have the map which shows you that it's laid out in the area of the streets of not only the Jewish star, but premacenery, the compass and square. So these things, those two came right from the beginning. As we know, George Washington was a Mason, many other subsequent presidents were Masons. And Karl Marx was a Mason, even though he was a Jew. Karl Marx and Ingalls who wrote the Communist manifesto. This in the Communist manifesto, it says the same things that I've been reading you here. And nine of the ten planks of the Communist manifesto have already been in stunts in our government. The only one. Just a few comments, Tandor. Jack, I mean, there are boy scouts and there are boy scouts in summer better than others. Just as there are Masons and there are Masons, I don't think they all actually are equally dedicated or competent to promoting whatever. It may be the Masons are supposed to promote. And I admit, I've got a lot to learn about the Masons. I do know from having read the Communist manifesto that just as Bernie was observing about Fidel that he promoted literacy among the Cubans and that was a positive thing. The Communist manifesto promotes universal education and the right of women to vote, for example. So, you know, we may want to discriminate between different aspects or articles of the manifesto. Just as we may about different actions taken by Fidel. No, I'm sorry. I have to disagree with that. Communism, communism is right out of the Jewish talent. Most Americans, and I talked to a friend of mine who is in college, a young girl, and she said, well, communism has never really been tried. I said, what do you mean? Jesus will never have been tried. I said, explain that to me. And she said, well, communism means that everybody is equal. But the communism that has always happened before is that there are some more equal than others, of course. And it becomes absolute dictatorship. And it's not benevolent. But that is what communism always turns out to be. And the Jews admit that. The communism is they tell the lower classes that they are for them, and they get them to work for them. And then as soon as they get in power, then they abandon them and abandon everybody else, and it's a way for them to gain the power. But Lorraine, I mean, not to dispute the point you want to make here. There are varieties of communists, and there is one derivative from communalism, where all property is owned in common. And whether it's some kind of form of consensus government, I don't think that has ever been realized except in maybe some behithi commutants, for example. And I believe that's really what the party you were citing, man. What do you think about Bolshevism? Well, I mean, the whole point is that when the Bolsheviks came in, that was Lenin and Stalin, I mean, they murdered millions of people when Mao took over, and that he was all composed, his all his advisors were Jewish bankers. And when they took over, they slaughter millions of people. And the historical point you're making is that the term has come to apply the very strong forms of dictatorship that perhaps not unexpectedly has entailed the loss of life of millions of people. Most certainly that was true under Stalin. Most certainly that was true under Mao. The collectiveization of farming in Russia or the Soviet Union, for example, led to the death of millions. So I don't think anyone would dispute. In Marxist theory, of course, you have this increasing accumulation of wealth in the hands of fewer and fewer and more and more of the workers who left destitute and incapable until there's supposed to be a point at which attention becomes so great. You have a revolution over throwing in trench delete, which is supposed to lead to the dictatorship of the proletariat as a transitory stage. But where communism or some kind of equality of ownership and so forth is supposed to follow, but it seems they never get beyond the dictatorship of the price of death. That's the plan. Looking Cuba, they're dirt poor in Cuba. They mean a lot of people who are poor. Marine have to do with US sanctions. We're quite brutal to countries that we can't. Why? You know why? We have a communist government. We have a communist government. Again, can you tell by looking at me what my principles are? No, you cannot tell. You can only know by the way I act and what I do and what I perceive is truth. When you look, we have, what are the clanks of the communist manifesto? They are government control of manufacturing, government control of education, government control of business, a graduated outtax, the huge taxes on death taxes for tax. All these things are part of the communist manifesto. But you got to sort them out, Lorraine. I mean, you're trying together a whole lot of disprin elements that might have individual merit isolated from the others. I think a graduated income tax is perfectly appropriate. I do believe in the estate tax demonizes the death tax to preclude the vast accumulation of wealth by small families. It gives them disproportionate control over the country. And, both importantly, Lorraine, you're not distinguishing between capitalism. We are profit-moded by private corporation that leads to the exploitation of the natural resources of other countries. Even though I would argue, the US is primarily not a communist nation in the sense of state ownership of manufacturing and productivity. I mean, I think we have to introduce a distinction. A capitalism can lead to many of the same faults or defects and exploitation of workers as communism. We have government control of the means of production. See, but even the Rockefellers who were Jews, are Jews, say that capitalism is a sin. They are communists and they admit it privately. They admit that they are communists and that they are the ones, the Rothschilds and the Soros and they're all, they control the corporations. The corporations aren't free. The corporations aren't free to do what they want. And so when you say, oh, well, this is not communism. This is not communism. What you have to do is you have to see the big picture and see what's happening to America, all the debauchery that's going on in the schools, the destruction of the family, all of these things are taking place. These are their goals. It's happening right before our eyes. And if we start separating this and saying, oh, well, actually communism is good for some things, my sister-in-law is from Germany. She was alive during World War II. She saw what communism was. And that was when the Russian communist forces were coming after them. She and her mother and grandmother fled from Berlin on foot to Stuttgart, which is several hundred miles, with nothing but the clothes on their back and a dishpan. And the reason they had a dishpan is because when we, the allies, would come over and try to kill the women and children who were trying to flee from the enemy, they would shoot them. They'd have to go into a goa here someplace and put the dishpan over their head because they were running from the advancing Russian Bolsheviks, not the Russian people, the Bolsheviks, who were raping every woman between the age of 85 and three years old, cutting their breasts off and nailing them to barn doers. She saw that. That is what communism is. She saw that and they were able to flee. Well, I think that's a bit sweeping into generalization, Gordon. I would suggest. I mean, look, there were a lot of atrocities committed and many were being committed by the allies bombing the German cities. That's one of collective punishment that has been prescribed by international law. Who started World War II? Who started World War II? Oh, we're going to get into very complicated. No, I know it isn't. It is not complicated. A lot of injustices meet in upon Germany and the wake of World War I that's really important to us. We're familiar with this. We know Hitler was trying to reestablish the economy of Germany. That Germany was the most resilient and robust economic entity, most creative of all the nations of Europe. We know that. Yes. So, you know, Germany was grossly abused by the other nations. No, they were the allies. The allies were England, the US and Russia. Correct? Three major, yeah, sure. Okay, these were the allies. Who was president of the US? Well, Frank Groenblom was the president. Who's name was Rosenfeldt? And Winston Churchill, I mean, this is a whole, the thing is we have to see that this is the great controversy between good and evil. It's not just, oh, this war and that war. The World War I was primarily not only to crush Germany, but it was to get Israel, which was in the hands of the Ottoman Empire. It was to get the nation of Palestine into the hands of the British. World War II was not only to crush Germany and Christianity in Europe, it was to get the nation of Palestine, which later became Israel, into the, from the hands of the British, into the hands of the Jews. That's what it was for. And that's what they accomplished. And in 1948, they formed the nation of Israel where they could be in a position to get the natural resources of all these other countries around them. Well, there's a lot of debate over whether founding a, what would become a Jewish state and they'd now formalize that last year to be the case as a good idea or a bad. I think there's a lot of argument, maybe it wasn't such a great idea, but Israel has certainly been swinging its weight around the world and also covertly through the press infiltrating the press in the United States. And a host of other technical issues. They did not infiltrate the press, they own the press. Well, on the press. They own every network, every television network, every major newspaper, every movie studio, so they have control of all the media. Well, as you know, I have a panel of 100 executives from CNN, all of whom are dual US is rightly citizen. Right. Well, that panel for the New York Times, about 100 executives, all of whom are dual US is rightly citizens, a third panel from the New York Times. 100 executives, all of whom are dual US is rightly citizens. So you're not going to get an argument for me about who controls the media. You're 100% correct. I would describe it as Zionist. There's one distinguish is that all between Zionism and even Jewish, which I would argue is actually important because not all Jews are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews. The Illuminati, which runs the world, is 75% Jewish. The other Gentiles are Freemasons, which is controlled by Jewry. So I'm not saying that every rank and file Jew is part of this conspiracy, not at all. However, there are many low-level Jews who are because they are the Zionists. They are the people who are in the various areas of government who do the low-level work for the big ones. And the other thing that you need to know is that I have many Jewish friends in orthopedics and I was visiting one of them not too long ago to take something back. He lives in Long Beach. And I wanted to say hello to his wife. I was just talking to him when I drove up. He was in the yard doing something. And so I talked to him, I want to say hello to his wife. So it took me in the house and I said, oh, you're having a party. And he said, well, not really. He said, you know, the Jews all over the world get together in their neighborhoods every month. Every month. Every month. Every month. Every month. And they are told what's going on in the world. He said, we are very, very connected. Very, very connected. But very connected. Connected. All over the world. These are the rank and file Jews. These are the rank and file Jews. And they are controlled and manipulated by the Illuminati Jews at the top to do, to promote the Holocaust, to promote that they're being victimized, to promote all of these things. So they are, yes, some unwittingly a part of this whole thing. But there are some Jews who know nothing about it at the lower level. But you have to understand that no even secular Jew or reformed Jew ever denounces the Talmud. They don't ever denounce it. They may not live by it like the Orthodox Jews, but they never denounce it. And it's the Talmud that is the quote unquote, holy book, the Jews do not live by the Old Testament. They live by the Talmud. They don't even know what the Old Testament says except for the borders of Israel. They will carry Old Testament scrolls above their head as an icon through the synagogue, but they do not live by it. And in the Talmud, it says they should not even study the Old Testament. They've got endorses them just by the Talmud. By the way, just to return to the Naga-Hite laws, has there constitutionality ever been challenged? I mean, it would seem obvious. These are unconstitutional because they violate the First Amendment. And I know your points about we're not living under the Constitution. I'm saying these things to me obvious that the legitimacy under the Constitution of those laws, whatever was passed on that occasion, ought to be scrutinized before the Supreme Court and ruled in valid because it's clearer they're unconstitutional. Well, first of all, not only have they never been challenged, but Trump, just within the last year, has confirmed them. And because the Sanhedrin in Israel asked Trump to reconfirm the validity of the Nauha'i laws. And he did so and signed them again into law just in the last year. And I had that date in my newest book. Yeah, I would like to address that issue in my own reports on developments in the news. So I'll track that down, Marena. I think that's valuable. I've been very disturbed by the extent that which Trump has been deferential to Israel, declaring Jerusalem to be the capital of Israel, which had to be part of a comprehensive settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian problem of declaring the goal on high, which the rest of the world recognized to be Israeli-occupied Syrian territory, to be a part of Israel, of defunding underfunding the UN organization that would aid in the best Palestinian refugees. And more recently redefining antisemitism to include any criticism of the government of Israel, actions taken by the government of Israel, which may be even more outrageous than the rest, because that's obviously again a violation of the First Amendment. You're saying he's reaffirmed these laws and profoundly disturbing because obviously a president of the United States who's taken a note to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution from all enemies who are in domestic ought not to be undermining it. Such an I have suggested that Trump's revision of the definition of antisemitism means that he is violating the Constitution he took an oath to uphold, and therefore it would be a bona fide in a peacherable act. The Democrats have generally interest any more than they have the assassination of Bacim Sula Mone or the assentions being imposed on Iraq, both of which are war crimes under international law. Let's see, but again, again, these laws are for the people. They are not for them. If you go back to all of this change when they murdered Kennedy, when they murdered Kennedy, they took control of everything in the government. Kennedy would not allow Israel to have a nuclear weapons plant. Kennedy wanted to get rid of the Federal Reserve. Kennedy wanted to get us out of Vietnam. Kennedy wanted to do all of these things, and so he wanted to run the government, and they said no, and he would not let the Jews form his foreign policy against the Arabs. So they shot his brains out on public television. Well, after that, you're certainly right about the Eastern establishments around the Fed was upset because Jack had instructed the Department of Treasury to issue hundreds of millions of dollars of United States notes, which I have won here. As you know, he certainly was pulling our forces out of Vietnam, which was like the third strike against it with the US military because he not invaded Cuba, contrary to the unanimous recommendation. And he'd gone ahead and signed an above ground test band treaty with the Soviet Union against our unanimous opposition. And now they felt that stand had ever taken against the expansion of international communists. And Jack was thwarting him on that count as well by pulling US forces out. It would have been, I think, done by the end of 1964 in all probability. But Lyndon was so eager to become president that he actually forced himself onto the ticket in Los Angeles in 1960 so he could have seen to the presidency when Jack was taken out. I mean, there's the lichpin, but you're 100% correct that JFK and David Ben Gourillon were at Longerhead, so were the Israel, Israel's desire to develop nuclear weapons and JFK's opposition there too. Well, other other buildings that work here, but those are among the, you know, who's motives those were to accomplish that. And again, Lyndon Johnson, as you probably know, during the depression was in charge of building that tunnel between the police department and Dele Plasette. And that was when where one of the shooters was. Now the main shooter was on the overhead bridge, which shot him from the front and blew his brains out the back. And so this was all a plan. This is, but see all of these things when you look at Vietnam, when you look at the Federal Reserve, they're all part of a much bigger picture. We can't get involved in just looking, oh, well, they want to do this here and we want to do that here. That is exactly what the Illuminati wants us to do. There is a bigger plan. And the bigger plan is to destroy Gentiles and to destroy Christianity because the Jewish townland is the height of debauchery and degeneration. Look what they're doing in the schools. Look what they're teaching children. Look how they're destroying the family. Look how they're bringing, uh, filled and generosity into America. Marron, mind we've identified, there are eight shooters in Dele Plasette. I've identified six Ole Domagarde this seventh with which I agree. It appears each of the group that were sponsoring the event was putting up their own shooter. So one is a Dallas deputy sheriff. Another is an Air Force expert. Another is a Dallas cop with ties to the CIA. Another is a soldier of fortune. Another is an anti-castle cube. But another is Lyndon Johnson personal hitman. I can tell you their location. Right? Sorry. There was a couple of the effects they had. Yeah. There was a group in charge. There was a very complex event. It was a great, flirt or less complex. It's not complex. It's simple. There was one group that wanted him out. It is simple. It is not complex. That's what they want us to do. To focus on saying, don't really know who's in charge of this. We do know who's in charge. Playing with all do respect. I think you're just a super person. But I dare say I've done vastly more study of the assassination. I published multiple books. I have a crack that cover up. I bring it together the best experts. OK? And you cannot tell me that this very complicated exercise was so simple. It was not. The CIA wanted Jack out because he was threatening to shatter into a thousand pieces. The mafia was upset because Bobby was threatening. I was looking for the mafia. I think the cops were upset because Jack was threatening to cut the all the police in allowance. I mean, I'm telling you, you're saying behind this heat, you're suggesting a deeper analysis, which suggests all those groups were basically voted the same. I think we're going to be a bit too bad. All by the same group. The Rothschild's own half of the wealth of the world. They control the corporations. They control the CFR. They control the trilateral commission. They control the club of Rome. Those are the ones who make the... They don't have to call the US military. And... Of course they do. Not to my knowledge. Oh, yes they do. But look at the numbers. Look, look. I think you take a lot of important points. But I think you're doing too many sweeping generalizations. I think you're making history too simple. My opinion. Well, I know that you have studied many of these things. But I have been studying this for 30 years and I have found out who's in charge. And the thing is as long as we're looking at this, as an isolated thing. And this is an isolated thing. We'll never see the big picture. This is the big picture of the war between good and evil. That's what it is. It's the war between good and evil. Our military is controlled. And our military is destroying our own troops. They are giving them force vaccinations, 10 and 20 at a time of vaccinations. Gulf War Syndrome is in part caused by vaccinations. It's in part caused by depleted uranium. And all of these things are planned. And... I have no doubt we agree on much more than we disagree. I just think in some aspects of what you have to say, you're glossing over distinctions that may be require more recognition. That's my point. The thing is that there is a group that's in control. There is a group that's in control of all of these things. Of all of these things. They're not isolated things that are just popping up on their own. There is a plan. And you see it in the protocols of the elders of Zion. You see it in, as I said, the Freemasonry goals, the communist goals. They're all controlled by the same group at the top. At the top, there is one group that's in control. And all of these other things. And as I talked to you earlier, the Harold Rosenthal interview in 1976 for which he was murdered because he was telling too many secrets to early. He tells you all this. He says, we're doing all of this. It's us. Is it written transcript? No, it looked forward to reading it and reviewing it and coming back to this subject with you on a future occasion. They'll have until traded all the churches. They control the religion of the churches, most Protestant and Catholic. That's why the churches teach such strange doctrines. That's why they want to destroy Christianity. They want to make it so it makes no sense to people. That it sounds like God is a horrible pyromaniac. That's what they want to do. They allew up in the main, allew up in the main translators of the Bible. For every single Bible, whether it's the NASV, by the way, I met the guy who was the in charge of the NASV Bible with my husband at this doings. And at that time, I was writing my book called Who Rewrote the Bible, showing how the translators have changed the Bible. And I said to him, I said, what if one of your, first of all, I said, how do you pay for all of this? Because the translation of the Bible is very expensive. You've got to pay a lot of translators. They've got to be able to communicate. You've got to have secretaries to type it out. He said, oh, we go to the major churches and we tell them what we're going to do when we ask them to endorse it and that they will sell it to their parishioners. I said, well, then you can't change anything from what everybody already believes. And he said, well, yeah, that's right. So I said, what if you do, if a translator said, this word is not correctly translated. It's not correctly translated. He said, oh, we fire him. So all Bibles are all the same. And they're all different from the original Greek and Hebrew. And that is available in the interlinear. And that's the way the Jews have made themselves out as being related to the Israelites because the word Jew is in the Bible, but it's not in the original. The word Jew is not the Bible. It's been written in because most of the main directors of the actual translators are Jews because they speak Hebrew. And so they control what goes into the Bible. And they have changed the word. The word Hell is not in the Bible in the original. The word Jew is not in the Bible in the original. The word Sunday or first day of the week is not in the Bible. They've written, they've changed all those things. And so they've made themselves, they put themselves in the Bible, which they're not there. Well, it's pretty fascinating stuff. I'm not a biblical scholar nor would I... You see, that's where it all stems from because that's what the Jews say. Where God's chosen people. Where God's chosen people. Look at us in the Bible. God gave us this plan. So without studying the Bible and what they have changed it to me, you can't understand their plan of what they're planning to do with Eirats Israel because they have changed the Bible to make it agree with what their plans are. But you're suggesting we can get a pretty good idea from the Harold Rose and Thal Winterview with Walter Rose. Yes. In terms of its contemporary manifestation. Correct. And that was in 1976, which is like 45 years ago. Yeah, yeah, yeah, right, right, right. My viewers have further advanced along the various dimensions of progress as they were envisioning it back at that time. They tell us what they... When Walter White laid it out. Actually, well, when Harold Rose and Thal... When Harold Rose and Thal... All those things have taken place. They all take in place. Who was Walter White at the time? This was a reporter. He was an editor of a Christian magazine. A investigative journalism, yeah. Which magazine was that? I can't remember, but I think it will probably be told in the entry. But I'm very fascinating, Lorraine. I think that we all ought to take a look to see what we find there. And I won't be surprised if we're just as disturbed as you are in talking about it. Because we need to get hypotheses and enable us to put the evidence together. And of course, that's what you're offering. A fairly global and encompassing hypothesis about how data points converge. Yeah, it's not very hypothesis, because when there's a plan and the plan is totally implemented, it's no longer a hypothesis. Well, I'm talking about intellectually understanding. You're talking about the flow of events. I'm talking about... If that's not... ...looking at it and trying to figure out what's going on. But that the intellectual part of it is confirmed by what is actually happening in fact. Yeah, you're drawing a conclusion. Whereas I'm talking about the methodology, the process of reasoning, technically, it's known as inference to the best explanation on which I have published extensively. But taking alternative hypotheses and sorting them out to determine which is the best supported by the available evidence, which is really a function of the probability of the available evidence. If those various alternative hypotheses were true, in which confirms the highest probability when you sort out often, it commit authentic, but often, inauthentic evidence can be a clue, because yes, as they altered the X-rays for JFK, there are very few parties who would have been in the position to do that. Most certainly, the mob could not have gotten into Bethesda and able hospital to alter X-rays under control of officers of the US, maybe in the secret service. The Russian KGB could not have altered the X-rays of JFK. Nor could they have substituted someone else's brain for the brain of JFK. Nor could they have got their hands on the Zapruder of the whole movie to revise it. These are things that require the highest level of the... Don't you realize that the mafia is actually part of the CIA? The mafia, CIA, were totally together. All the drug running that comes in, that it was coming through Mino with Clinton when he was governor there and still is going on. The mafia, the CIA brings in the drugs, the mafia's doing something, they take their cut and they give the rest back to the CIA, which uses them for black ops. Well, I agree that during a significant part of US history, the mafia and the CIA were two sides of the same coin where the agency was committing assassinations abroad in the mafia at home. I mean, I'm just making a rather more technical point when we're talking about autopsy x-rays. I mean, this is not something the mob could have pulled off. But obviously, the other side of this two-sided coin could have had a role there and it appears, you know, yes, positions at Bethesda who were actively participating in concealing the two causes of death of our 35th president. Well, you know, a resident that was at Parkland Hospital, he finally came out just a few years ago and I read his interview and he was asked why he didn't come out and say this before. He said because every year on the anniversary of the death of JFK, I was visited by the FBI and told that if I didn't stay silent, my whole family would be killed. Who were you talking about? I have his name, but I don't have it right now. But he was a resident at the time at Parkland Hospital and he was there at the taking care of JFK when he came in. Charles Crenshaw, MD, of course, was in trauma room number one when Jack's moron-man body was brought in. He provided diagrams of the womb to the throat, a small clean puncture womb before and after the trakiostomy sensation. End of the blow out at the back of the head for both the back of the side, he was also two days later responsible for the care and treatment of his alleged assassin, Leo Oswald, during which he received a phone call from the president of the United States. Telling him he wanted a deathbed confession in Charles explained to Lyndon that actually he was doing better now and he thought he might survive. Lyndon persisted and said there'd be a guy there in a trench coat to take his confession. When he got back, there was a very sinister fellow in a trench coat who we believe was David, as Sanchez, Gonzales, who was a key player in the assassination. In fact, when E Howard Hut gave his deathbed confession to his son, say, John, whom I have met, he said the chain of command went from Lyndon to court Meyer, who was a charge of operations for the CIA to William Harvey Western Hemisphere. I mean, David Atley Phillips, Western Hemisphere, the CIA to William Harvey, the David Sanchez Morales, who appears to have been the same guy in the trench coat. And but Lee took a turn for the worst, there was no confession because he died. I mean, this all fascinating stuff, just as everything you have been telling me, Lorraine is fascinating stuff. And I'm looking forward to more conversations between us in a few minutes it remained today. What would you like to add by way of summation? Well, I guess that I know that your training was in philosophy where some of the greats in the past, their idea of philosophy was that everything is to be doubted. But there is truth as you learned at Sandy Hook and at the Boston bombing, there is truth. And you have printed it in your books. We know there is truth because two plus two equals four. There's only one correct answer and there are billions of incorrect answers. So there is a correct answer to what's going on in the world. And it's not going to be all over the place. It's going to be one correct answer, just like two plus two equals four. That is not a complicated situation. And once we look relevant to all of these things, we see they all fit into a very specific pattern. And the guidelines and the plans have all been given to us in the protocols over the elders of Zion, in the George Guide stones, in the congressional record January 10, 1960, they're all there and they're all the same thing. They're all the same. And so they tell us exactly who's in charge and who's doing this at the very top. So it's certainly the adversary would like us to be all over the place and say it's a very complex issue and not ever be able to find the truth. But there is truth and we can find it. Well, Ray, I don't doubt the existence of truth. I defended in many contexts, I define it roughly, a statement is true when it corresponds to the way things are, otherwise it is false. So we can talk about it. It's probably, of course, monocity to reality. We have to distinguish between kinds of truth to my sue equal form, being a formal truth that's derivative-approvable on the basis of logic and deductive reasoning alone, whereas most of the truths about history are empirical truths that have a different standing from the point of view of the theory of knowledge with regard to the degree of certainty, with which they can be known. There are such truths without any doubt in where we have to base our conclusions about which claims are or are not true on the basis of research, especially using inference to the best explanation. And be open to the inevitable prospect that with new acquisition of new evidence or alternative hypotheses, we may have to reject hypotheses. We previously accepted, except hypotheses. We previously rejected and lead others in suspense. I very much enjoy this conversation and look forward to others between us, Lorraine Day, a courageous woman who speaks her mind, knows what she's talking about and makes a very persuasive case. This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the real deal, looking forward to future conversation with Dr. Lorraine Day.