Donate.

Advertisement

On the face of it Manchester

Please select playlist name from following

On the face of it Manchester

20 Comments

Please login to comment

Video Transcript:

In a world where there are many atrocities happening at all at once, some get more publicity than others, but when it comes to terror attacks in Western society, the coverage given to them is immense and overwhelming. This technology has advanced the speed and delivery of the news is so precise and details of the event are provided to the viewer near flawlessly. You can't help but stand in awe at the ability to not only deliver the news under the circumstances, but also gather the information such as photos, videos and interviews without much delay. This documentary is called on the face of it in Manchester, as we the general public should review this event ourselves with our own eyes and our own minds without all the noise. When this event occurred it grabbed my attention more than any other Western society terror attack due to its close proximity but also the level of detail in terms of the victims that were involved. That said, some details were and still are sketchy and since this event is now seemingly concluded, I cannot simply forget about them. That is why in this documentary we will look at the key elements that make up the official narrative and from reviewing these elements at a normal pace rather than the fast pace quick cuts that the news typically show, we can work out if there are any inconsistencies and what that means to the narrative provided. Please understand, if you are watching this and you are directly or indirectly affected by this event, this documentary has not been made to offend or upset, it has been made in hope that people will independently think about the details that are being given to them by the media at the time and not just taking them on face value. It is very easy to simply read a headline or get a feel for an event based on minimal exposure to it but in reality there is a lot more to them especially in the case of the Manchester Arena bombing. So for example, did you know that the fire brigade will hold to stand down and not assist other emergency services? Given the nature of this event, it seems a strange call to make and this command resulted in a fireman writing a letter talking about their shame and anger. I mean the letter is told to them understandable because ultimately, they are angry because they are witnessing what was happening on the news and they weren't allowed to do anything about it. So from my point of view and hopefully yours too, the question is why? It is these kind of questions and inconsistencies that if at this point you are keen to know more than please watch on as we are going to get up to speed with the basic outline as to what happened on that night based on the official narrative. Note, this documentary has not been made to force an opinion or viewpoint on you, it is to simply look at the evidence that has been presented to the public and logically analyse it in hope that you will form your own opinion on the event in general. The Manchester Arena bombing was the deadliest attack in the UK since the 7th of July at London bombings in 2005. The artist performing at the Manchester Arena was a pop star called Ariana Grande who was on a dangerous woman tour. On the 22nd of May 2017, a 22 year old male detonated a homemade shrapnel-laden bomb which resulted in the deaths of 22 people. It was originally reported that 59 people were injured, this then became 119 but then on the 22nd of June this figure was revised by the police to 250. The 22 year old detonated the bomb at 2231 within the FIA area of the Manchester Arena. The people affected by the blast were either waiting in the FIA for others or people leaving the concert. Sixty ambulances were sent to the arena to handle the injured that were coming out both the train station exit and the arena exits. The Manchester Arena was opened in 1995, 22 years before the attack, whilst the maximum capacity in Manchester Arena is 21,000, the attendance for this concert was recorded to be 14,200. The train station situated under and next to the arena was closed for the first week, with the arena itself remaining closed until 9 September 2017. In between this time, a benefit concert called the One Love Manchester was held on the 4th of June 2017, with free tickets being given to those who attended the original show, a total of 55,000 attended this concert. A total of 22 people were arrested in connection with the attack, but all have been released without charge. The Manchester Arena FIA prior to the attack was classed as a public place as it linked up car parks to the arena, the train station to the arena, and also three months prior to the attack, a McDonald's which had been situated in the FIA for the past 17 years. The FIA was open to the public mainly due to the box office, whereby tickets could be bought for upcoming events. To get into the arena itself, you would have to present your ticket at the doors and once in you would be standing in the con course. This con course ran around the outside of the arena itself, and you would find stalls such as food, drink and merchandise being sold. Toilets are also situated in the con course too. You would follow signs in the con course to find your specific seat, or if lucky enough for the floor area. To get to your seat or floor area, you would pass through doors which typically open ready with a member of staff on hand to point you in the right direction. In effect, the con course acts as a divide between the arena and the FIA. The security which was man in the doors in each seating area was a firm called Shellsec. One of the main entrances into the FIA is via a walkway which connects the train station to the FIA. From ground level within the train station you can either use the stairs or a lift which takes you on to a walkway which goes over part of the train station and into the FIA. You then pass through some automatic class doors and you're into the FIA itself. The bomber has said to have used the lift to get to the walkway and then through into the FIA. In the last chapter I concluded by saying that the bomber used the lift before using the walkway. However, since the purpose of this documentary is to analyse every bit of information we are given, is this actually correct? Soon after the attack these photographs were released to the public. Based on this article, when the police released these pictures, they would not confirm whether they were in fact from the lift. Now this is a problem for me because in one hand you have the newspaper stating it without the police confirming it and for me that's just misinformation. This is why all evidence presenting must be judged on its own merit, otherwise we'll just end up believing anything that we are told. Ultimately though, does this picture confirm that he used the lift and he is in fact heading towards the Manchester Arena? Well of course it doesn't, it's simply blacked out, this could have been taken at any time at any place. The same can be said about these two pictures. These two pictures are supposed to show Salmane Bida buying a Rucksack that he would end up using for the bombing and that this is from inside the Manchester Andale Centre. Why is it especially in light of a terror attack when it comes to CCTV, even the public never released any or what they do show is so grainy that you can't actually make out what is being shown to you and therefore you are just left with the headline itself explaining what it is it's supposed to show. Whatever you are watching here is a riot that happened in 2011 in Manchester and as you can see these cameras that are in the Andale are perfectly fine, they are zooming on people and you could recognise their faces if you wanted to, so why are the ones for Salmane Bida so blurred? Since the public can be provided CCTV footage of him doing his shopping or in this case empty in his bins, I don't think it's too much to ask seeing the actual bomber walking across the walkway into the foyer. It really seems that on every post that has a light on it there is in fact a CCTV camera and as you can see at the entrance to the foyer there is also a camera there too. If we had this it would be conclusive. It is seriously important as well because certain witnesses like Emma Johnson who was in the foyer at the time of the explosion states that she actually saw a gentleman wearing a red jacket before the explosion went off. Based on this article that was released in the public it says there that a man in a red jacket was spotted before the explosion. Now this red jacket, grey jacket confusion could simply be squashed by CCTV showing either guy in a grey jacket walking in or a guy in a red jacket but since we've been provided nothing then what have Emma Johnson's story? Is she lined or is she telling the truth? We've finished the last chapter on this picture so let's focus on the sequence events based on this article provided to the public. Number 1 it says that the doors opened at 6pm letting in 21,000 fans for a sellout concert. This isn't correct as only 14,210 did. Number 2 it says that at 10.30 a balloon spectacular marks the end of the show and thousands begin to leave. Is this actually correct? That was the actual song at the arena and you could see the balloons however when marrying this song up to the night's playlist it wasn't even the second to last song. Number 3 we've already highlighted the issue with the red jacket but it says that the man is spotted at 10.30 before a bomb like bang is heard. This is not correct against the official narrative which states the bomb went off at 10.31. Number 4 at 10.35 police are called to reports of an explosion. Again this is not correct since the official narrative is that the first calls came in at 10.33 as per the official timeline given. And finally number 5 it says that unaccompanied children were taken to hotels for the night. This is also not true. Once you could potentially argue that newspapers may not have its facts in order where did they get them from to confidently publish them in the first place. Emma Johnson regarding the red jacket or how about Paul Robinson regarding the children taken to the hotels. Now some people have called her the angel of Manchester but Paul Robinson says she just wanted to help. Anyone who is looking for the children that make him the way to the holiday and make him way to the holiday and put my phone number on for people to ring me. So here are the social media posts that Pauler is talking about. As you can see she first says that she's got loads of kids with them and are taking them to the premiere in which is here. She then says she's taken as many kids as they could to the holiday in which is here. Finally she confirms about 50 kids are safe. The thing is, whilst Pauler not only featured on mainstream media with Channel 4 she also featured on the BBC and here's what she had to say. You've had parents calling you today? Hundreds and hundreds on my phone and all with pictures of the children and just do I recognise them. Did I see them? I've got the child with me and things like that. Which haven't. This is the only element of this whole story that is true. Pauler Robinson did not have any children with her. This is then reinforced by not only the holiday and the premiere in stating that they had no children coming in on the company but also too bad the police. So what is more likely that on the night Pauler and her husband think it would be a good idea to pretend and act out the scenario using social media as described moments after a terror attack for nothing more than getting their 5 minutes of fame but in doing so I've managed to fool hundreds of thousands of people along with the BBC and Channel 4. If that was the case you would think that the media would drag her name through the mode for fabricating the story just like people who have claimed to have survived the Grimfeld Tower fire. Or is it more likely that the story has been made up by the media as a puff piece and Pauler is just simply playing her part. If that is the case then how can a story be made up in advance and played out in real time on social media without any foreknowledge. Whatever you want to believe the fact is that Pauler's story is not true and the same media that reported it to start with didn't correct the public. Here is another fire witness. Andy Holy claims to have been in the fire when the blast went off and despite being blown off his feet through the ticket doors and into the concoct wall he had no physical injuries and he was the first person to contact the BBC to provide further details on what had just happened. Whilst I don't want to talk too much about his story to the BBC being completely different to the story that he gave to the Liverpool Echo newspaper this chapter is about the timeline so what does Andy Holy have to say. They were then and I just went back to the room and then about 10 past 10 I made me wait upstairs for you which is a big waiting area before you go in right now the box office where they are full blown off. I was stored pretty much where it went off. So it got to about half past and the singing stopped so me and the girl said oh it must be finished to be out now and then about two minutes later she started singing an uncle and this is where I think this bum has got it wrong. I think he didn't know she was doing an uncle and he's come up there ready. People are standing to come out she started singing again and I think if she had not sang that song it would have been five times worse because you'd have had everyone coming out. So it got to about 25th to answer the girl and it was to allow this noise of every head the floor show. I got forced through the door across the walkway that goes down the green it and landed near the wall. Fist clear my eyes. Now hand on heart do you believe that Andy was in the fire based on his account. Bear in mind that his timeline is off. He says the concert hadn't finished which it had. He says that he was right next to the bum was thrown off his feet against a wall but was totally unharmed by it even that or the bum. If you do not believe a story then how is it that Andy was giving VIP tickets to attend the one love Manchester concert mingling with BBC staff. Get Paula Robinson did he have them full too. One thing is for sure Andy likes to ask for free stuff. Do you remember seeing this piece of footage it was played over and over on the news. Since you are now familiar with the fire layout these people have come from the fire from out the glass doors along the walkway and down the stairs. This footage came from a boycon Zack Bruce and he left the concert early and on his way out heard the bum film this and then went back to the hotel. Now I am not too sure why but he ended up tweeting this when he got back to the hotel. It seems a very strange thing to do just after what you have just witnessed. He was interviewed the next morning by an American news station called CBS where he too had issues keeping his story straight. In one story he left and didn't know what happened until he got back to the hotel but then he is credited for filming this. How could he film this and not know what had happened. I just took the video off and then I just walked in the hotel because I didn't think it was anything serious. He has left early, heard something and seen the very people who would have been waiting in the fire. How could he not know it was serious. Could he not tell from the people running down the stairs. In any case Zack uploaded the footage to YouTube and even in his description he says that this footage was before the bomb went off. How can that be? How about another person who got media attention. This is Chris Polly. He too also left early and in doing so captured footage when running away via the train station. When asked by the BBC via Twitter as to when the explosion happened he specifically says 2230 because his footage was taken at 2231. If the official term of the bomb going off is 2231 how was this possible? A person who did not believe as a count and stranger still he was also in Barcelona when Terror struck there too. Since this chapter is about the timeline whose timeline are we supposed to believe. The official police narrative, the man in the fire, the man running away or Zack who didn't know what happened, filmed anyway and said it was before the blast. In any case the news present this information to you regardless of its inconsistencies and possible fabrication as it roughly fits the narrative. From my point of view this is not acceptable when you're talking about an event of this magnitude. In the next chapter we'll look at the fire itself. Now we're going to look at the fire in terms of the timeline we'll part that issue for now. Since the official narrative is that a bomb has gone off based on the newspapers such as the Guardian which said the bomb caused the crater and a skylight was shattered. The TV news repeatedly showing people panicking and witnesses versions like Kim and Phil Dick who were also in the fire used words like black ash, accrued smoke and rubble and dust everywhere. You would assume that the fire which is in effect one big room would be in a terrible state just as the news said. If this dash cam which managed to pick up the sound of the blast 280 metres away with music playing in the car then this must have been a big bomb. Many people have compared this bomb to that of the Manchester IRA bomb in 1996 but how about the IRA nail bomb of 1982? If we agree that the arena nuts and bolts bomb was big how does it compare? I'm warning you advance for showing this picture but it is necessary when reviewing the evidence presented. As you can see this is an open area and the devastation is huge. It is logical to think that in an enclosed environment the scene would be much worse. So what has been presented to the public in terms of the Manchester arena bombing? This. This is the only picture that clearly shows the inside of the foyer. Again this documentary has been made to clear your mind of what you have been told and just judge each piece of evidence individually. So in this picture do you see a crater? Do you see shattered glass? Do you see nuts and bolts in the doors and walls? Do you see rubble, smoke or ash? Do you see anywhere near the same levels of blood as per the previous picture? It might be a morbid set of questions but again this event being the magnitude that it is needs to be questioned. This picture was taken approximately here and is pointing in this direction with the ticket doors on the right. The official narrative is that 22 people died and 250 people were injured. It is not conclusive from this picture but does not look like that amount of people are seen. Even one person on the floor is looking at their mobile phone. Note the newspapers typically blur such people out which will make you believe it is for respectful purposes when in this case it is so that you do not see what it is for yourself. Andy Holy who we have spoken about before claims to be this gentleman here. In his full story he claims that once he got back up half the concoarse floor he went back into the fire and started checking the dead bodies and assisting staff. He told the baby see at 2350 that night that he saw approximately 20 to 30 people in the fire. It is my belief that this man is not Andy Holy because the man here has a bald head which Andy doesn't. If he is lying about this as well as his other inconsistencies how could Andy know how many people in the fire without actually being there. Another key witness is Darren Costa. Darren credits himself to being this gentleman here and in Darren's version of events he ran up to the fire after hearing the bomb going off and the first thing he did was drag the bomb as torso from the concoarse back into the fire. How he has managed that without blood being everywhere is beyond me. Darren on his personal Facebook page also states that it was a small bomb. If that is the case then how did the dash can pick it up. The final piece of revealing evidence Darren provides is that whilst he says he was in the fire helping he says that he did not see any dead or injured children. How can this be? Darren did feature whilst only briefly on the recently added ITV documentary 100 days after Manchester. It is a pity the ITV didn't get into explain this key point. If Darren didn't see any children then what of the story of the two homeless men. One was pulling nails out of children's arms and faces with the other talking to a young girl who had no legs. How much has been said about Stephen Jones who is the one on the right but a lot has been said about Chris Parker. Chris Parker states that when he heard the bomb he ran into the fire and saw a small girl with no legs. He asked the girl where her parents are and she replies. The newspaper don't mention whether this girl survived or not but they then move on to say that Chris held a woman in her 60s in his arms till she passed away. The public in press clearly didn't fact check this because the oldest person to have died was 51. Was this person looked like someone you would describe to be in their 60s? Well regardless of this 50,000 pounds was raised of Chris. This money has been put on hold as his due to appearing court in January 2018 for allegedly stealing a bank card and a mobile phone whilst helping the injured. The thing is if the story is not true then how can his criminal charges be true as well. This documentary has been made in October 2017 so we'll have to wait and see what happens to Chris since he's entered a plea of not guilty. So who else can we see in the fire picture? So looking at this picture we can see what looks to be paramedics, police and members of show-sec. The thing is what if I told you that they're not paramedics and they're not police? Prince Charles and Camilla were allowed to visit the arena the day after the bombing and they met the staff who were first on the scene. This is the on-site medical team for the venue, not the paramedics. In actual fact this is the only paramedic on the scene, a gentleman called Paddy Ennis. Paddy was the only paramedic allowed in the fire for the first hour. Now I'm going to go off course a little here but the official reason for the 60 ambulances having to wait outside for the first hour was to allow the police to sweep the building in case of any other devices. This is a fairly good reason but when you have a room full of injured and dying people you would think that the room could have been cleared to allow medical assistance sooner than that. Maybe that's just me but we'll be coming back to this point later. So these people who look like police are in fact the Manchester Victoria train station security. If you visit the train station even now you'll see them walking around looking like police but they're in fact a private firm. What this concludes is that this picture was taken very soon after the blast. So how about the security staff, show-sec? I've been researching this event in great detail and I cannot find a single statement from show-sec regarding this event. This is very strange because many witnesses such as Don Wade were saying such things as. But it was just absolutely horrendous and the security was awful. I'm sorry to say that the security did nothing about it and there should have been more security and we walked through the doors when we had our tickets and the Scania tickets and we wasn't even checked. They never checked bags at all. I never saw them check at anybody's bags. She even then crossed the road and ended up doing another interview with a different new station but said a similar thing. What goes on ahead is security for one. We didn't get checked. Our bags never got checked as we walked in. There was plenty of security getters but they just seemed to be interested in getting people in, scanning the tickets and then putting them to the seats but they never checked our bags at all. I could have worked with the Rucksack, I'm sure of it and then it wasn't even bothered. It was just lack of security. Even Zack Bruce made a comment on security. Well the funny thing was I went to show them a ticket but when I was gone there no one had scanned me, they just showed me my ticket and then they let me in. The same goes to the people who were there, no one was searching bags or nothing. So did these two guys. Apparently bags weren't being checked. We never got checked. We ended the venue a few people that we spoke to, like friends that would met before and after the gig. They said their bags weren't checked or anything like that and usually I'm quite a regular gig so I'm used to getting bags checked. The security purposes but there was no, no we just got to show it away straight in. No security checks whatsoever. There's plenty of news articles talking about the subject of security and what I find most bizarre is that even though this was put out to the public, the public seemed unfazed that the same security firm was allowed to look after the vigil, which was held the next day and also the one love Manchester concert too. Since an inquiry and investigation was going on, you'd think that they would stand down until the dust settled but as I say no one seemed to mind and it was business as usual. In reality though, these witnesses in the newspaper articles are a red herring. They're a red herring because the Fia is an open public place. The security had no bearing on the actions of the bomber as he did not enter the arena. So why would these people almost scripted insane such things and the newspaper report on them? Well it's because they now have changed the Fia. It now has plenty of security and even metal detectors and you can't even get up the stairs now as it's blocked by a show-sec. In any case, I think under the circumstances of the attack, here and from this company or this man would have been useful but as I say we had nothing. Just as a reminder, this photograph was taken approximately here in this direction. You're about to watch a video which was taken approximately here in this direction. The angle is similar to the picture but still pointing mostly towards the blast area. What the person filming does do however is pan around to see the room more in its entirety. This video has never been made public. Stills of the video have never been used in newspapers nor the video shown officially online or on television. Just like the picture, we're reviewing this evidence with a clear mind and open eyes. We will first watch this without sound and then again but with sound. Based on what has been discussed so far in this documentary, do you have any observations? We will now watch this with sound. You're going to hear the train station emergency Taniyat announcement for the most part. Attention please. Attention please. This is a public safety announcement. Once again, hand on heart, does this look like the scene of a bombing and by further extension, a scene described by so many including the media. The only paramedic in the room who told newspapers he didn't know what to do for the best due to the amount of people needing help can be seen casually walking around after talking to what looks like a train ticket conductor. There doesn't seem to be any sense of panic or urgency in this video. Where are the injured? 59, 119 or the 250, whatever the figure may be. This room is very empty and there's very little by way of noise of people crying out for help. I'll be providing my personal conclusion on this matter towards the end of the documentary but for now feel free to rewatch and look at the video in detail, especially if this is the first time you have seen it. When doing so, ask yourself this question. If the media are happy to show you the picture, why not the video? Now we're going to look at the concourse area. Whilst Andy Holy have been blown off his feet out of the foyer in the concourse, Nick Bickerstaff was also in the foyer. He doesn't state what time the bomb went off or where specifically he was in the foyer but after the bomb went off, he then stood in the concourse and recorded himself whilst looking for his daughter. And here's the video. Oh! Holy! Come on! Come on, come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Hallelujah! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on! Come on. Come on. People are laughing and they don't know what's behind me. People are busting for bits and walk their bodies everywhere. Oh ho! Ellen! Ellen! Ellen! Ellen! So based on this map, Nick has left the foyer and all those in it, where it says 206. I'm walked by the bombous torso which down cost ended up moving and then headed towards 210-211. It begins filming there and the first screenshot will look at is back down towards the foyer. In this frame you can see two members of Shosek and if he's so concerned in finding his daughter then he could ask them what's happened or ask for help. But he doesn't. In this portion of the video it seems like people are mimicking him when shouting Ellen and later in the video he says that people are laughing at him. Then another showset member can be seen in this clip, then in nearly bumped into another one. This next frame confirms where he is in the concourse but more importantly watch the video back and look at everybody else's demeanor. Everyone's calm but him. The final bit of the video is the most telling and that's because within this video he describes in great detail the bodies that he has seen. He can only know that if he's actually there but again we have another person in the blast radius uninduced but also completely clear of any debris, dust or blood from others. If he wasn't in the foyer and you think this guy is a chancer based on the video he's recording then how could he know about the bodies? What's do you think about that? Also ask yourself why would anyone film themselves under these circumstances? Why not just ring the daughter? Did he not know the seat number she was sitting in as he seems to be just staying in one particular area rather than running around properly looking for her? Why not ask help from showset or at very least alert them to what has happened? If you're wondering why he recorded this he says it was because he thought a second blast might happen and if his family found his found they'd know he was looking for them. If he can believe that another strange occurrence have come across as that it seems showset was stopping people from leaving via the foyer before the end of the concert. This is confirmed by a Jenny Brewster who was interviewed by Sky News that night. And so we did we went to the bathroom and then we said let's go now before the rush. So we walked towards where the car, where the MEN car park is where we were parked and there was a row of stewards stood in the line stopping us getting to but they were very friendly and they said this isn't your best way girls, you're best turning around and you can get to your car park that way. As I turn around boom one loud noise. In a recent TV episode of a program called Educating Manchester a girl called Freya also described similar. We went to the hotel to walk down to the Freya area and by running the waiting room with less past and obviously we had a massive explosion and it went quiet and then everyone just started screaming and running. As I was expecting all the chaos that was going on they haven't thought about the possibility of foreign knowledge which would explain why they would be refused access by security to a normal exit. Next we'll go inside the arena itself. So now we're looking inside the arena itself. The media put out a wave of different videos in no order whatsoever making it very difficult to work out a rough timeline as to who filmed what and when. So to try and get a handle on this we'll look at the clips in what I believe are in the correct order based on the density of the people still in the arena. As you know the bomb was set off in Freya here. This first clip we'll watch is from a girl who filmed approximately here in the floor section. The first clip we'll watch is from a girl who filmed approximately here in the floor section. The first clip we'll watch is from a girl who filmed approximately here in the floor section. The first clip we'll watch is from a girl who filmed approximately here in the floor section. One thing is for sure. To counter any witnesses claiming that the explosion was before the end of the concert this clip confirms it was not. Here we have a tweet from one of the videos we'll be looking at later stating that the blast was approximately three minutes after the last song. In this clip it is filmed after the concert and manages to capture the sound of the blast. A Michael Jackson song can be heard and it's either 45 seconds into the song or if it's the second chorus around two minutes 20. Before we listen to the clip you can see large parts of the arena are already left tying them with the tweet that was previously shown. While it's on it's a powerful video let's look at the other videos that followed. This next clip is from approximately here and seems to be a person who is unsure as to what's going on and you can just about make out that someone mentions something about a balloon. Someone on Twitter asked the person why they were filming and they said it was because people were shouting it was a speaker. Now we're getting close to the fire with this next video which was taken approximately here. As you cannot hear anybody saying anything specific a couple of people are pointing over towards the direction of the seats nearest to the fire. It's a funny video, it's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. It's a funny video. This next clip is one I believe to be the closest video taken by someone in the arena that was nearest to the fire as they were approximately here. There's people here at the back of the arena. Yeah, but I'm running and running and running. You just keep on reacting to me. I'm thinking of you. I'm thinking of you. You can die in my short day out in the background. That's what we're saying. The person who filmed this ended up making a YouTube video about his experience and he says that he asked a member of Shellsec what had happened and this is their reply. This next clip is from approximately here. You'll hear them talking about a gunshot but the male in the video says it's not a gunshot. It's a mic which I presume is meaning the speaker. Oh my god, why do we want everyone to do that? I think people thought it was a gunshot. Is that a gunshot? Look at my eye. What's happening? I thought she was down there. I can't see her. These next two clips have been synchronized together as they capture the same moment just at different parts of the arena. It is clear by this point the majority of the people have left the arena. Please, gentlemen, please take your time. There's no need to punch up. There's no problems here. Just take your time and keep exiting the building. There's no need to punch up and run. Take your time. There's no problems here. Thank you for coming and having a good time tonight. Everything is fine. Just take your time exiting the building. Thank you very much. Walk slowly is the only to run. Thank you. It is quite clear, as you could imagine, that there was a lot of confusion and many people say that they heard gunshots. Balloons, the speaker, or an AC unit and so on. This was the same on social media too, where there are many examples of these things being sent by people in the arena. What I found strange at the time was the likes of Andy Holler, who I said before was the first person to contact the BBC, since the reason he's calling is because people are saying it was balloon popping. It's almost like he's trying to overrule other people's accounts. I've found out because so many reports come in that it was like a balloon and things not happening. It was definitely an explosion and there's definitely a lot of fatalities. Emma Johnson, the woman in the fire who saw a man in a red jacket blow up, also said the same thing to the BBC. I lying last night because there was reports of it was a balloon going off. It was a speaker exploded and I had to tell the story for all those that had lost loved ones. But it wasn't. How is it that we have two people who have two conflicting versions of events, both which don't match the official narrative, yet they're making sure they inform the BBC that other people's accounts are incorrect? This tweet that I showed you earlier comes from this final clip. I cannot pinpoint where it fits into the timeline, but once the news showed it over and over, it's actually the person's account are more interested in. This is the girl who filmed that clip. She too also made a video and put it onto YouTube talking about her experience. I remember when I was on stage after the last song day in just woman and the lights come on. Me and Elle and I sit down because everyone's getting out of their seats ready to go. We were like, we'll just wait like five, ten minutes until everything's calmed down and then we'll go. We thought like five, ten minutes and everything's going to calm down. And then we heard a loud, loud explosion bang noise, which kind of scared us in a way, but we never thought anything of it of like it'll be a bomb. We thought it was just like loads of balloons popping at the same time or something. So we turned around, everything went silent and bang, and we turned around again. And it was like when a farmer releases his gunshot into the sky and all the birds scattering the sky. So whilst the news were happy to use her video to push the official narrative, there didn't report on the fact that this girl heard two blasts and this brings us onto the next chapter. So we ended this chapter with this girl's account from the night. We thought like five, ten minutes and everything's going to calm down. And then we heard a loud, loud explosion bang noise, which kind of scared us in a way, but we never thought anything of it of like it'll be a bomb. We thought it was just like loads of balloons popping at the same time or something. So we turned around, everything went silent and bang, and we turned around again. And it was like when a farmer releases his gunshot into the sky and all the birds scattering the sky. Now it seems this girl was not the only one who heard two blasts and it's clear that that was the case because the media originally reported it this way too. This girl wrote a letter to Henrianna Grande and here's what she said. I'm hoping that Henrianna Grande's concert will be a great event this matter. To Henrianna Grande, I'm the number one fan. I was at your concert, the 22nd of May 2017, my tester, and I'm really sorry that someone sat some moms up. I hope you are okay, but it will still come back to England again to perform. Overall, you were so good and I can't describe how amazing you were. And I'm extremely sorry, silly people didn't think that this. And I really hope you're lucky and scared. Keep writing and singing the last few songs with the front of your number one fan. We just kind of started leaving and then two families went out and the anger was started screaming and ringing the wind. And the saddest of the saddest right now is that just Henrianna and Henrianna and Henrianna and the men. And online local newspaper through Facebook had many comments from people also saying they heard two blasts. How can so many people hear two blasts if the official narrative is that only one was set off? Much after the event, around 130 in the morning, the police carried out a controlled explosion to what turned out to be a pile of clothes in church grounds over 300 metres away from the arena. Like Andy Holy and Emma Johnson trying to override people's accounts of hearing balloons etc. Have the police carried out this controlled explosion to make it seem like this was the second blast. That said, you can tell from these people's accounts that blasts were almost one after the other. Given the nature of this event and the emotional element to it all, it seems important details about this second blast and I'll totally forgotten about. As far as I can find, there are no videos from anyone leaving the arena via the fire exits. Here's a video taken from someone approximately here and are presumed they're making their way out via the nearest exit as the fire is behind them. This next clip is from someone leaving via the main back exit which is here. These are the stairs at the back of the arena. Anyone who was in the fire would have been captured inside Bruce's video and if they wished they could then come out of this train station exit and merge with the crowds that had come from the back stairs exit. The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the The next stop is the Having been to the arena to see concerts myself when I saw this video I thought to myself that the footage does not look much different to any other crowd leave in a concert let alone one that's being evacuated. Here's a clip from another event so how do they compare? It's only my opinion but there's not much separating these two clips to me they both just look like crowds of people leaving a concert. In any case after the bulk of the crowds had left at around 11.20pm a local freelance photographer began taking pictures which would end up being the official photographs you've seen. The next stop is the Jogunman took this picture in 2016 claiming he was just at the right place at the right time when in actual fact he was purposely going around Manchester taking photographs of people in drunken states. In the pictures he took for the Manchester arena bombing he managed to capture some people who would end up becoming key to the event such as Safi Rousseau's dad and brother. He also took a photograph of Safi's half-sister who can be seen here sitting yet was in the foyer with Safi at the time as they were both leaving the concert. Yet Safi was deemed to be missing. Now that we've worked our way through the Manchester arena looking at the basics which make up this attack. In the next chapter I'd like to provide you with my conclusion. Please note that this is simply my conclusion and opinion as to what happened on that night. I appreciate that I was not there but this is based on the evidence given to me as a member of the public. My conclusion is based on reviewing other terror attacks and the evidence presented in them because you'll find the blueprint for them is very similar no matter what occurred or where it happened. I hope that regardless of this documentary you'll still formulate your own conclusion based on what research you do yourself. If you've seen elements of this narrative that have made you think more about Manchester then this highlights how important it is that you do not take anything on face value. In the Hillsborough disaster that killed 96 people if the public blindedly accepted what the police and media told them would they have been the same inquiry which concluded that both in short had lied about the official narrative or not likely. Even now, two weeks after starting this documentary the chapter regarding the official narrative has now changed the police have recently reported that it is in fact 512 people that were injured. How can this figure keep going up after six months? There was an inquest in June which said that 220 people had been treated for blast injuries so how has this figure now more than doubled? So now to my conclusion. In May 2016 a terror drill was being carried out in a shopping centre called the Trafford Centre in Manchester whereby the scenario was that a terrorist walked in through an entrance and detonated their Rucksack. It looks pretty real right? Well it seems drills are something that happens quite frequently prior to actual attacks so for example in London Westminster a drill was held three days before the Westminster Bridge attack in March 22nd 2017. On the 7th of July 2005 a live drill was taken place the same day and astonishingly the scenario was exactly the same as the official narrative. Today we were running an exercise for a company bearing a mind on the private sector and we sat everybody down in the city, thousands of people involved in the whole organisation but the crisis team and the most peculiar thing was we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on the London Underground and Mainland Station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real and one of the first things is get that bureau number when you have a list of people missing tell them and it took a long time. Just to get this right you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario. Almost precisely I was at 12 o'clock this morning because it's our job my own company, vice consultants we specialize in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing and we chose a scenario with their assistance which is based on a terrorist attack because they play close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York a logical thing to do. And I'm still going to see how extraordinary today must feel for you as it unfolds. You mentioned a few moments ago there. Just so you know Joe Gummim was also at the traffic centre drill taking photographs. As mentioned the Manchester Arena fire was in effect one big room, a pubic place that can be separated by simply closing the doors and blocking the movement of people. It is my belief that the reason why two blasts were heard by so many is because they were in fact two blasts. The first, similar to that of the traffic centre drill that is loud enough to create a flash and some smoke, with the second being the sound recorded by the girl in the arena but it has actually come from the speaker. So for example people sitting are looking to leave fire the fire in seating area 106206 here the first blast and it's enough to begin the panic within the arena. The second blast is needed only to get this across to the other people in the arena. Listen how the song cuts out allowing the sound of the blast to come through the speaker and then the music carries on straight after. This would explain why so many people inside the arena had no idea what had happened. Some thought balloons because the fire blast wasn't that big and others are saying the speaker because it actually was. Even this person who wasn't that far away from the fire area doesn't know what had happened. How can that be? In effect the smaller fire blast scares the people nearest away from the fire with the speaker blast making sure the rest of the people in the arena run the other way and use other exits. Anyone leaving early like Jenny Brewster or Freya who stated that they could not exit fire the fire because they were blocked off by Schossek prior to the blast. Seriously suggests for knowledge and the preservation of the fire scene. This preservation and for knowledge is highlighted too by the fact that a McDonald's of 17 years closed down three months before the attack. Have you ever heard of a McDonald's closing down let alone one that serves not only people attending the UK's biggest indoor venue but that two of a major train station? Understand if the McDonald's was still open you would also have members of the public in the foyer who were there for nothing morning getting something to eat. The scene can be said about the staff and it's for this reason why you couldn't have unapproved people in the foyer as they may have seen what really had happened. Think about why no one was allowed in for the first hour while the fire brigade being told to stand down. It's for the same reason in order to control what was happening in the foyer you could not have eyes all over it. The foyer is not completely destroyed by the official narrative bomb because it was a small one just like the traffic centre drill no craters no shattered glass. Down in cluster also said it was a small bomb too but it didn't sound like that based on the arena girls video. No the dashcam video from 280 meters away. Then again Zach Bruce who was in the train station when he heard the blast didn't think much of it either as he just went back to his hotel. I just took the video I heard the explosion I took the video and then I just walked in the hotel because I didn't think it was anything serious. Again this video is key because everyone you see here has just come from the foyer. Can you see anyone in the video dust, debris or blood on them? Why are they not screaming what has just happened or telling people waiting at the bottom of the stairs? It is my opinion that Zach is ready and waiting to film people running down the stairs and the small bomb noise is nothing more than a starter pistol giving them the cue to run. My view on this is further enforced by this upcoming clip. In this clip you'll see the same people from Zach's video casually walking out to the train station. Again showing no signs of being in a room that's killed 22 people and injuring 512. Don't forget these are the people that should make up part of the 512. What is the more? More worry in this video is that in both clips this girl and her mother can be seen. In Zach's video they are running down the stairs and in this one they're casually walking out to the train station. This is the girl with her mother and they're sharing a hospital room with others during a visit from the queen. Now if Zach Bruce was work ready and waiting then the person who filmed this was also already in waiting. It just seems the media felt Zach's video more dramatic which is why you may have never seen this other clip. This thing can be said for the 5A photo versus the 5A video. I ask the question why the media have not shown the public the video. Well the reason is is because it goes against all the witnesses who have put them put them in front of a camera describing a scene that doesn't match. The fact is just like Zach Bruce's video versus the other the 5A photo looks worse than the 5A video so they've had to run with that. Again if the media are picking and choosing what they report on and what evidence they supply in support of what has happened then they're not acting as journalists. They're simply following a script to make sure that they're all singing off the same him sheet to deliver the same message. That message being that whilst no evidence has ever been given to the public that the bomber entered the train station, lift, walkway or 5A has caused the deaths of 22 people. It's simply a case of giving you the public just enough pieces of information for you to believe that that is what has happened. Now it might be at this point that you're thinking that this simply cannot be possible. At the end of the day the official narrative is that children died. It is this emotional angle that keeps you blinded from reviewing their evidence which we have looked at in this documentary and furthermore make it difficult to even talk about. Remember, 5A witnesses do not match the official narrative. The levels of damage do not match the official narrative. People who filmed and submitted content to the media do not match the official narrative and even people who are supposed to be injured do not match the official narrative. There is a term coined called doping delight. It is described as the pleasure of being able to manipulate someone often made visible to others by flashing a smile at an inappropriate time. Serial killers have been caught off guard by this reaction when lying about their story. When in their mind they think they get in a way with it and this reveals a smile. When I close my eyes I can see Christy reaching her hand out to me while I'm driving and the blood just keeps coming out of her mouth and that maybe it'll fade too with time but I don't think so. That haunts me the most. The Manchester Arena Bombay is not without doping delight. I mentioned that this girl is sharing a room with others during the Queen's visit. This other girl can't help but give off doping delight even when asked if the incident was scary. I was just walking out to meet my dad because he was picking me up from the concert and then it went off. I remember the explosion in my years just started ringing the fridges and people screaming and things like that. It must be really scary. Yeah it was quite scary. It's kind of scary. Remember this is a young girl caught up an injured in a terror attack and she's smiling. She isn't the only one. Andy Holy's daughter was also in the Liverpool Echo's interview and she too cannot help but smile regardless of the questions being asked. Did you sort of know what had been on or? I knew straight away it was a bomb when it went off. I mean I was just about to go through the doors and it was really loud. Everyone just froze from an in and everyone just started to run. What did you think of it then and then you knew your dad was stalemate and had waited nine years or did you just not have time to think of that? I'm more focused about getting me mum out because she looked like she was going to faint and we just went the opposite way and I just tried to get out first. How about this go? Jess where were you when the explosion happened? We were right just above where it happened really. We were about to go down the stairwell into the concession area where it happened. We heard the explosion, everybody turns to the left, screamed and started running. So me and my friend who I was with we just went back to the stage area, the main concert area and tried to get away from the mass of people that were stumbling out really. This girl who sustained perforated eardrums but left the hospital after five hours and is unfazed about going on national television. Again smiling as if it's nothing. It's all the people and it's just really like you don't expect it and you're just looking around and you're looking but you're not actually remember looking at the people in the back. I just knew I had to get out in case something else happened and I would just grab a new thought of grabbing our hand and just running. As we both fell over the people in the front kind of in front of us took the brunt of the explosion so I only have the not that severe but quite severe injuries to my legs. I've got a strap no that's been removed from my lower leg and this where is one of those nail bumps or the side bolts and nails that's like pull the skin out. I'm not trying to skin this in, I just really have to be more careful. Whilst it's not quite the same even in Prince Charles's visit everyone is standing in the very arena smiling and laughing the day after the attack. The arena was closed so why these people in their work clothes? As mentioned once the majority of the people had left the arena the photographer then comes into play to capture the moment for the benefit of the media. Some pictures were taken by others such as this one which shows a girl who was injured using their phone despite reportedly having a severed artery in their wrist. This girl was also in the hospital room during the Queen's visit. In short I believe this attack has been staged just like the Traffin Centre drill just without ear defenders or goggles. So now you must be thinking why? Not only does this seem impossible to carry out regardless of what I've shown you, why would people do this? The same goes, money is the root of all evil and my goodness is this event raised some money. It is reported that 250,000 pounds has been given to each of the families who lost a relative with various grades of money given to those who were injured. This money has been raised primarily by the public, you. The public who've been told various lies and you've been asked to give your money to the cause. When you're watching interviews of people involved no one is angry about what has happened. I have no feelings of hate, anger, at all because I don't think this person deserves any of those emotions. I should invest in, I'm staying with my positivity for Martin and that's what I want to hold on to. There was an opening in quest in June and none of the family members affected attended. It seemed strange to me as a person who would want to know anything and everything about what had happened. Why do you think doping delight can be seen on some people? It has been a case of let off balloons, have a couple of benefit concerts and move on. Go fund me another website of the like, are utilized as a means of raising money from the public, they keep a percentage and then it's distributed as and when. Terror attacks are a serious money spinner. How many are willing to see in the news before you get fed up of them? Are you just going to keep lighting candles, letting off balloons and giving some money to all websites, only to repeat it next time? The media at all tell you that love is stronger than hate and other phrases like they won't win. But this is a form of control to stop you from finding out the truth or at very least look for it. They want you to accept anything they throw at you. Take a look at the passing screen tube train bomb. Regardless of it being on just a bucket in a plastic carrier bag, they tell you that 30 people were injured and the public just buy it. Just like the fire, can you see signs on the train wall of any blast damage? No. So maybe at this point you might be thinking this is all too far fetched. It just cannot be done. So let's quickly look at some other examples. Orlando Florida 2016. Regardless of zero CCTV footage of the perpetrator entering the nightclub, he is reported to have killed 49 people and injured in 58. Even though during a long standoff with police who blocked both ends of the street, a small camera crew are allowed to capture the moment as injured patrons walk by. The problem is, they're walking in the wrong direction and they're actually heading back towards the nightclub. In this clip you can see the man that they're carrying doesn't realise that they're still being filmed and despite being shot in both legs, they put him down and he's fine. Over and over and over again, they didn't immediately go inside that building because there was an active shooter. They were trying to figure out how to get everyone out and also get in to try to take down that shooter. This gentleman here claims to have been shot four times within a salt rifle yet miraculously, he's out to the hospital the next day. There are many issues with this event but these two are very simple and on questionable problems with the official narrative. And the money raised for that event? $30 million. New York 2001, a lesser known building called the World Trade Center 7 falls at free fall speed for no reason. Whilst originally overlooked in the official report following 9-11, the eventual explanation for this impossible feat was down to office fires on some of the floors. Worse still, the BBC managed to report that this building came down before it actually did. That more now about that from our correspondent, Jane Stanley. Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers Building and its collapse? Well, only really what you already know details are very, very sketchy. There's almost a sense down town in New York behind me, down by the World Trade Centers of just an area completely closed off as the rescue workers try to do their job. Newtown Connecticut, 2012. His father must not have realised the cameras were rolling as he walked up to do a press conference, as he had a big smile on his face before getting into character to talk about his daughter who was shot and killed the day before. So we'll see if Robbie Parker, I assume he's going to come out to the microphones now and make a statement looks like the family is there and they're getting ready to come to the microphones so we'll listen to it. Check. What's my name's Robbie Parker? Are these things limited only to America? Of course not. It's a territory. It's worldwide. Before we go to other events around the world, the US had a key part in the official narrative for the Manchester Arena bombing. But forget, they were the ones who were leaking the bomber's name and pictures of his backpack. Whatever did come of this in the end. Well who knows because the media will only report on what they want to tell you. Did you ever see this picture? Well from my research, this is in fact the first ever use of the picture online. How is it that a UK-based reporter for a US paper not only has the picture but can confidently say it's fake? Whether it is or not from the night, I cannot say because the sources are known, like a lot of pictures that will put out to the public. It did seem strange that a newspaper based in Birmingham here in the UK said this too. The point is, if you look at the American terror events and think that the UK ones are somehow different from them, that's not the case. An America has their name all over the Manchester Arena event too and that includes the performer. Nice France 2016. This is the truck that ran over people killing 86 and injuring 458. Yet not one drop of blood can be seen. Also, the authorities ordered the deletion of the CCTV cameras from that night. France again, Paris 2015. This is a terrorist who walked into a cafe and blew himself up. Providing CCTV of this actually made this one worse as it shows the bomber blow up and disappear with the cafe patrons perfectly okay. During the same attack in France, whilst you'll find no evidence of this, it is reported that a suicide bomber tried to enter a football stadium, was refused entry and he blew himself up killing only but himself. The only evidence of this happening is what sounds like a blast through the stadium speakers. The football match wasn't stopped though. Westminster Bridge, London 2017. A man has driven a car across a bridge killing four and injuring 49 before going onto stabbing killer policeman. This is a video taken showing people that had been hit by the car that went over the bridge. Problem is, in this video clip, even though the car is supposed to have already gone by, the same person can be seen taking pictures of Big Ben. Despite London being one of the most monitored cities in the world, what footage has the public been given? This, a blurry, unclear video from a building, X amount of meters away. How about our relatives in Australia? Melbourne 2016. This couple went on national television claiming that their baby, regardless of the laws of physics, was hit by a car sending their young baby 150 meters down the road and can even smile while saying it. The little Zara survived the initial impact of the car. She was thrown according to her parents, 150 meters along Bergstraight. To put that into context for you, that is almost three quarters of one city block that she simply survived is amazing. I find it totally miraculous. It is a miracle. The child can go 150 meters through the air. The little ones of I would be not that badly injured. And that's... Again, there has been no CCTV evidence showing a vehicle hit in any pedestrians, but still the media are happy to allow people the platform to talk for their account, no matter how impossible it is. There are so many issues with terror attacks that this documentary could last a lifetime and it's for this exact reason why you must look into these things yourself. Do you think the increase of armed police is going to be for your benefit? Do you think installing ballads is going to be for your benefit? How about the installation of metal detectors at concert venues? It's not about keeping you safe, but about keeping you in fear and under control, and these attacks are concocted to do just that. Not only that, you are giving your money to them for them to provide you with these lies. Finally, going back to Manchester, you'll know down at some point thought about the funerals of those involved. I don't claim to know how they managed to pull these things off to the detail, but remember, in the case of Westminster, they held one big funeral for the policeman that was stabbed. If the car didn't go over the bridge, then the stabbing couldn't have happened. If the foundations of the story are questionable o