Gleason´s Flat Earth Map Study Hidden Message + Book + Link´s

Video Transcript:

and Welcome everyone. I would like to ask you to ponder this map. Now we don't know exactly who released it or the reasons why it was released. We know that the map was well scanned. It was done extremely well. The file size is about 33 megabytes and the detail that you can zoom into is extremely good. But when you look at this map and be perfectly honest with you, I never even thought about it. If you're going to take the time to scan a map, this probably was a rather large map at the beginning, to scan this map into a high resolution map or excuse me, high resolution file, wouldn't you move the arm that's in the center there, out of the way of the most of the landmass and put it in the south Pacific ocean or the Pacific Ocean outside of Alaska? Wouldn't that make more sense before you scan the image? So logically the next question is, well maybe they put it there for a reason. Now this map actually had two of those hands that you see there. This is what the pattern looks like. And basically the way it would work is that you would put the two arms, line them up with the two points if you wanted to calculate the distance between two points. You would put the arms over the position point A and point B and you would be able to calculate the distance. So first if you wanted to know how far the distance was from these two points here, you would 45 degree north latitude. And then however many degrees times 60 nautical miles would give you the distance. So you have to think back. Whoever released this map had an intention of releasing this map. What was their motives for releasing this map? And I personally think there's only two possibilities. One is they had found this map, knew the importance of it and wanted to share with the world. Or they sent this map out into the wild on purpose to mock. But why leave that arm in that position? Why were the second arm cut off and why was that one cut off at that point? And it would seem that that arm is landing right about the Middle East area. Now there's the 33 degree latitude mark is on there. It's the same. Either way, this map, the reasons for the releasing of this map, we don't know. It is a true map. Now the landmasses may not be exactly perfect, but that is the shape of our world. I'm sure in the last 150 years the landmasses that are probably a little more better defined with the current technology. But either way, that is the world we live in. There's no need to make more maps. I mean there's no reason for it. This is the world. This is the map. When I measured Australia, it comes out to be the same. We know our world is flat and the best way to measure a flat world is by degrees and time. It will tell you where the landmasses start and end. So I don't know why this map was released. I don't know why it's pointing to a specific spot on that. Because logically, if you're going to scan a document of this importance, why not move that arm all the way to the Pacific Ocean or remove it all together instead of being right smack in the middle of important landmasses. That's something to think about.