Donate.

Advertisement

9/11 Nuclear Demolition scientifical presentation by Heinz Pommer

Please select playlist name from following

9/11 Nuclear Demolition scientifical presentation by Heinz Pommer

2 Comments

Please login to comment

Video Transcript:

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Nice and bright. Yeah. We're friends. We hope this year has come to an end. I want to refer to the flowers, the flowers, a flower. The flower has come from Germany. It's a new music coming. For the future, it will be nice to be with you. Thank you very much. Still a few words about myself. As you have already heard, I am a physicist. But I am earning my money by writing a technical documentation. This means my job is to collect information inside an enterprise. Information describing complex machinery as generators and to simplify this information, to structure it into small pieces so that it becomes easily understandable. In short, I am doing instruction manuals. In respect to 9.11, I have been researching this topic for five years. To begin with, I was in a fortunate situation not to see the pictures of 9.11 until September 12. Indeed, my cousin phoned me on that day and told me that the wall trades and the hat completely collapsed. But I decided to wait one day before looking at the event to guard my distance. So the next day, I already had a clear picture in my mind of what to expect. So, expecting the towers to toppling over and falling down, or seeing the towers splitting into two parts, leaving a gaping fissure in the middle. Anyway, I thought a third of the tower must still be standing. The pictures, however, did in no way correspond to these expectations. Of course, what remains in a set of shock, seeing these pictures, seeing the suffering of the people. But at the same time, the stupidity of the explanations provoked in me a deep fatigue, a sort of tiredness. And I told myself, I don't want to have anything to do with this. That's not my job. I leave this to the architects and engineers that stare field of business. Please don't bother me with this topic. Ten years passed by. And one evening, by chance, surfing on the internet and watching some clips on YouTube, I found a story from author Sophia Smallstorm, 911 Mysteries, Demolitions. And I was surprised to see how much information was actually available. In a certain way, I was even amused to see how rich the information pool was. And information pool created by individual persons, people like you and me collected all this without the help of a government institution or organization. And as a result, I started to get acquainted with this information, studying it my spare time and to structure it in a sort of checklist. After all, that's my job. That's how I'm writing technical documentation. I structured and summarized the claims and findings of Sophia Smallstorm and the architects and engineers for 911 Truth. And I told myself, how can we recognize a classical controlled demolition? The propagation of dust clouds is only horizontally in case of a classical controlled ammunition. But on 911, they vertically rose up to 1500 meters. Normally, dust clouds are cooled when a building is brought down, but on 911 people got burned. Normally, you can hear loud explosions clearly, but in this case, we had a small earthquake, 10 seconds before they collapse, and then you heard a deep roar, a bass hole. We have the destruction at the building's base, but in this case, it stood firmly by this integrating on top. And then the entire structure is integrated in a huge fountain. Normally, you see a quite big heap of rubble, but in case of building seven, we observed a sunken in debris field, and in case of the towers, debris was scattered in a white area around them. Whereby, most of the building is integrated into small chunks. Normally, objects around the building do not inflame, and in this case, a 911 cars went up inflames up to a distance of 800 meters, and one factor, which becomes more and more obvious, the strange diseases developing nowadays. In case of classical controlled emolition, there are no health issues, but in the meantime, more than 72,000 people need medical care due to 911. Finally, we observed a strange and extreme cruelty of the state, indeed despising the citizens and the first respondents by declaring the toxic air officially safe to breathe. Well, this is our first attempt to structure the information showing that there seems to be more behind than just a classical controlled emolition. Still, one point, this is a short taken from a helicopter that are dead. You can clearly see that dust clouds are hot. At first, a small knob forms over the north tower, and a symmetrical ring of dust clouds can be seen. And then this ring of dust clouds rises steadily with the knob standing inside the ring, and it rises within one minute to a height of approximately 500 to 800 meters, so the former knob is no longer visible. Well, this is our first comparison, and then there were, let us say, some curiosities, which I would like to show you shortly for the south and respectively also for the north tower. So, just a few clicks to begin with, we have the south tower's top toppling over and starting to rotate in 3-4. Suddenly, stabilizes as if hitting a stopping bolt, continues 3-4 and dissolves. The disappearance of angular momentum during 3-4 while being dissolved at the same time is something which cannot happen. Then you have the wide fumes escaping at the building's base. I sort of find this which is rising from below while the building itself is boiling over mushrooming on top. At the south tower's facade, you have the very well-documented steam explosions, which you all know, you have the eruptive destruction pattern, thus the ejection of material, where at the same time you find still standing structures of the building's core. You have the formation of different sections inside the dust cloud, meaning you have a very interesting cloud in different shapes and forms. You see a pitch black cloud of iron or steel dust. Smoothly, this truted metallic dust simply appears as black, and you see a white cloud respectively, showing the correct characteristics of a fountain. In addition, through the fountain you have a firmly-standing cloud stem. When using the word fountain, I mean you see many people say in this case the building would have bruised at its base. When you observe a water-spout fountain in nature, you see that nothing bruised at its base. When the water jet exists in the nodule, the energy of the material of the water in this case is sufficiently high to counter gravity by its directional kinetic energy and momentum. And this is exactly what we observe in case of the south tower. We had eruptions of steam and gases from underground, meaning that even before the main cloud was rolling over and through the streets, you had these eruptions from underground, you did at the same time. This is an example. The cloud will grow significantly in size, you see rising before the main dust cloud. This is the same shot taken from another position. And here again, that's the same steam eruption from below, which will grow very very rapidly, mixing with the black iron cloud showing here. So why is mixing with black? This means you have highly energetic phenomena underground. The cloud will grow significantly in size, and then you have extremely low energy. And finally you have the formation of steel-syncing structures, which will remain from the building, noticeable near the base. And finally you have the formation of steel-syncing structures, which will remain from the building, noticeable near the base. Normally you have a complete destruction at the base, and in this case structures are still standing partly in big pieces. The same applies also for the north tower, just clicking through the information. We have residual findings of thermite, you see the mushrooming on top, and the escaping fumes at the building space, while the building is cooking over on top, so to speak. We have the steam explosions at the building's facade. These, you know, very well, as they are shown quite often. You have the adaptive destruction pattern, meaning the ejection of material, clearly visible here, as the formation of parabola. And you have the formation of different sections inside the dust cloud, also in the case of north tower. The black iron cloud centering in the middle. You have the fountain and the standing cloud stand. Here in comparison to a nuclear experiment, usually right over the cauldron, hot many thousand degrees, are standing cloud developing. The stem formation is still invisible in case of a north tower and stable for quite some time. You have pressure equalization and powerful currents of upwinds. In the beginning I found this difficult to understand, there were in fact survivors inside the north tower and even a person who survived a free fall from this position downwards, just because the whole object was acting like a wind tunnel. So he dropped several floors inside this wind tunnel, which means that the upwinds had at least a speed of 150 km per hour, which is needed to have a person floating on the resulting air cussion. And the firefighter in the protected pocket at the base said he had to crouch down into a corner in order to prevent being lifted upwards, stating that this helmet started to fly off his head. Do you have any sense for how you fell from the 22nd floor, which is the way you've identified it? You landed on a rubble that most people think was about seven stories high. We're talking about a 15 story free fall on theoretically a piece of concrete. That's why they call you the 9-11 surfer. There are people in this documentary as the viewers will see tonight, MIT physicists who explain perhaps what might have happened, a hurricane forced wind that almost lifted you up and allowed you to float down. Do you remember at all what it felt like? Do you have any idea of how you might have survived that fall? I remember everything. I remember the fall. I mean every moment of that fall I remember. So I experienced it. And I think it's how I've been describing it that I guess the experts were able to come up with that theory. I was wounded myself, you know. So I guess it makes sense. I heard this very, very loud noise above me. It was just a tremendous roar. And then the wind, a very, very fierce wind in my heart. It started lifting me up with the ground. And so that's when I crouched down. All the next thing I just crouched down, I got to the corner of this staircase by the railing. And I just got as small as I could possibly get. And at last you have the famous Spire, what is the Seal Standing Structure, which you see here. The Spire is the Seal Standing Structure, visible for both towers, which was especially pronounced for the North Tower. Here you can see the collapsing North Tower. In a few seconds you will see the formation of the Spire. Oh my God. Well, here it is. These are the remains of the tower. It will stand for 10 seconds. It also will crumble down. In addition, you can also see the central cloud and the ring of dust, which started dry, shortly after. Well, at this point I already thought this is rather interesting because something about it seemed a bit odd. And entirely supposing that all this is just a simple classical controlled demolition, well it didn't look that way. And nonetheless, I did not believe in a nuclear component. I just decided to let things rest for a few weeks and started to browse for some material containing political information on the Internet. And between other stories I found a statement of former CIA agent Mrs. Susan Lindow. And I was listening to her after work. If you know how things are still sitting at the computer in the evening, listening to some alternative media information. And what she was talking about seemed to be in accordance with the average knowledge, with the accepted news and information. She was talking about Iraq, about the sanctions, about the children dying because of the sanctions. But suddenly she was saying something which did not fit the accepted frame of information to such an extent that I decided she must have gone mad. And I switched the channel. But after a while I returned to this information channel to relist them. Actually she said she had received a personal warning from her superior recordaries to absolutely avoid the trip to New York at all costs as they were expecting the use of a thermonuclear device in the city. He warned her of radiation contamination. And Richard Fuse said to me, my God, what if there is no FBI director when this happens? I said, do you think it's that soon? Do you think the attack is imminent? He said, oh yeah. He said it's absolutely just in the next couple of weeks. He said, this is, he said, I don't want, and I said, well, God Richard, I'll go back to New York right now. And I'll get, I'll pump the Iraqis and see if they've got anything from back, Deh. I'll see if they have any news for us. And he said, oh my God Susan, don't go back to, do not go back to New York City. It's too dangerous. We are expecting a deuse of a miniature thermonuclear device. And they were not afraid that I was going to be hurt by like falling debris in the World Trade Center. I wasn't going to be at the World Trade Center. They were afraid of radiation contamination. Like the winds blowing the radioactive stuff. And that's what they said was like, don't go up there. We're expecting mass casualties. After a while, however, I stumbled over another story on YouTube as well. Unfortunately, I cannot name the source for this clip anymore. Finally, it will depend on historians like Daniel Ganzer to prove this story correct or false. Our politician came out with the information that I had had a visit from an American general in Brussels, who told them in respect to the formation of the coalition of the willing. You must join us. The situation is much worse than you think. Or some have been loud and it's in possession of about 15 small nuclear weapons. He's ready to use them. And if you don't join us, there is a real danger that nuclear mushroom clouds will rise over European cities. The politician in his interview continued. After these words, the American general showed us a video where we watched in horror and disbelief her gigantic mushroom cloud rose over New York. We asked after the presentation if you could make this video available to the public and the general denied our question. This was classical information. For me, this was also a strange sort of news. I was thinking to myself, what is talking about? For I had never heard anything about a guy in mushroom cloud in relation to 9-11 rising I was on part of the city of New York. And then I started my research searching this mushroom cloud only. I dropped everything else and concentrated on searching for this mushroom cloud. I was thinking to myself, it can't be number one, it can't be number two. Consequently, it belongs to building seven. But building seven collapses into a heap of rubble. Period. Then a few weeks passed by and suddenly I found it. Really, I was so amazed I watched a clip over and over again, derizing mushroom cloud over building seven. Actually, the news anchor was commenting the event compared it to a volcano eruption. I'm watching all day. This is like watching the collapse of an active volcano. And the dust from it is not unlike that from a volcano. We are on the phone with New York Fire Department Lieutenant. David Restuchio, Lieutenant, where are you right now? I'm at the corner of North, North, North more streets and Greenwich Street. Can you confirm it was number seven that just went in? Yes, sir. And you were, you guys knew this was coming all day. We had been at, we had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually we'd either come down on the zone or it would be taken down. I would imagine it came down on the zone. Well, the total height is approximately one and a half kilometers. This small tower here is 300 meters high. On this basis you can estimate the overall height of the mushroom cloud over New York. This was building seven. No, you have to search quite a long time. I found only five shots of the mushroom cloud, most of them are taken directly from below. I made them available on my website. They are reference and available. The cloud shows some unique characteristics if you look carefully. It has a funnel, a so called war text. It shows several sections or steps in height. And after the funnel it has an extra bulb on top. This means that you have strong friction and an instantion of phenomena between the cool and hot masses of air. In addition, if the first layer of cold air is reached and the energetic center from below pushes with a hot sting of hot air through this cold layer, then you will observe that out of the already cold masses of the cloud and you funnel emerges. This is the one which is shown here. So first you have these cauliflower mushroom clouds, then you have the funnel. Here you can see a different picture of the same situation this time taken from below. On the right you can see a reference picture of a nuclear test Nancy. And you have the mushroom cloud climbing to a height of 1,300 meters or 1,500 meters. This small tower that is vanishing the base search 300 meters in height here you see 200 meters. All this is a rough estimation based on the height of the surrounding buildings. Here you can see the nuclear weapon test Nancy. You see the stem formation of the main cloud standing firmly above the cauldron with the boiling rocks underneath as well as the characteristic second block. Error no. And in every taboo there's a growing suspicion. You did not really by chance carry out a nuclear field experiment on the civilian population. A suspicion which seems not too far fetched especially when analyzing the current political situation. If you are planning a third world war then you have to know how to deal with radioactivity in a densely populated area and not kind of medicine you have to provide to the suffering civilian population. These people are planning things on a different scale. They have goals global control. They do not care about a few hundred thousand people who die of radiation sickness. Concerning the persistent hot chambers on the ground the shots taken by a satellite are showing one very interesting feature. The building's center is firmly not very active which seems strange at first. Also on this picture you see that the center of the building spaces 7, 1 and 2 does not store the entire thermal energy. However this makes sense when you suppose that we witness here the formation of a cavity or several caverns. You have to understand that if you detonate a nuclear device on a ground without giving the possibility to depressurize what will happen to the explosions energy in the rock bed. The rock bed can't be compressed. It cannot disappear. The only thing that can happen is the formation of a liquid rock bladder under high pressure which stores the energy of the explosion. So as a result you have this magma chamber, this bomb created so to speak. I mean a secondary bomb which contains a secondary energy, not a full energy of the first explosion but a part of it. The ground itself stores this secondary energy and this magma chamber wants to burst open and if it does enter itself you will have to found an effect in the cavity created. And an empty cavity is not good for storing heat simply because it is filled with nothing more but air. Well and I really got sick after seeing these photos. These are vitrified, formally liquefied rock structures inside the cavity. These are situated in a york and you see these glass like structures of formally morten rock in the melting pot. The rocks were boiling. The workers shown on these pictures most likely got significant doses of radioactive radiation. This means that they contracted cancer with high probability later. With this we have already collected a considerable amount of pieces of evidence. And while reviewing this evidence I felt somewhat sick on the other hand I also got angry. Because you have to understand what the perpetrators finally did to the firefighters. First they created an event using these airplanes and the first responders rushed into the towers. When the firefighters were inside the towers a nuclear weapon was detonated directly underneath the building. After the collapse, after towers they ordered the first responders into the area without adequate protection and without the warning that the area was contaminated. So that a medical study could be carried out. Then Congress at first blocked a bill which would pay for all of the healthcare costs of these first responders. Finally they passed a bill which would pay for some of the healthcare costs but specifically excluding cancer from the bill. And only in the year 2011 and because of public pressure, President Obama signed a so-called Zadrogor Act which finally caused a massive damage to the victims. And it was a result of the fact that some of the healthcare costs of the first responders who suffer from cancer. So the despise for human life in all this planning can hardly be topped. It would not be exaggerated to call this a tanning. If you detonate a nuclear device in a shower underground are very small one in this case with 1 kilo tons yield and at 20 meters below the surface you will get an impulse response. Impulse response is easily explained. You take a wall, throw it on the ground and it comes back. This is the impulse response. You can also trigger an energetic event on the ground. You hit the ground and the ground hits back. Then the surface will burst open as a result you will first see an idle shaped soliton. So this is the result of 1 million kilograms one kilo ton. Here you can clearly see the impulse response followed by a wave front or crest, this fountain shaped structure. Then the entire formation seems to be stable for a few moments. But then you will see after the impulse energy has been fully released the rising hot cloud from the extremely hot center below. Well in this case it rises to 1 kilometer in height. But one thing you can observe also are the bystanders, the seemingly uninvolved spectators who are watching the event with interest. Of course they do receive a modest dose of radiative radiation during this experiment but they do not die. They certainly do have a slightly elevated risk in contracted cancer. I would not have chosen to take part in this but none of these persons suffer directly in the immediate aftermath of the acute radiation syndromes. Now let's see how we can produce just one newton radiation pulse. Let's start with a simple experiment. We take a device, place it underground, then sealing the shaft and finally detonating it. In this case as I said before only a chamber of liquid rock will be created and pressure cannot escape from this chamber. We just have a highly pressurized chamber of liquid rock. Now let's make a thought experiment. We leave a small shaft open leading to the device. In this case directly after explosion a short mutual impulse will escape upwards through this shaft before the shaft is sealed by the liquefied rock chamber. Of course the liquid rock chamber will rise a bit and try and depressurize. In case of a small shaft however the liquid will soon cool down and create a plug closing everything else in. As a result you have a weapon at least hypothetically by which you can trigger one single short nutrient pulse out of the ground. Eventually you can use this time fraction of mutual radiation which will escape the earth. Next we have another explosion, Cedarne which was placed 10 times lower at 200 meters. Consequently yield is increased by 100 times simply because the energy of the explosion is distributed on a spherical surface, meaning the explosion is distributed. So if you have 10 times the depth yield must be increased by 100 times. This video clip is unfortunately very much out of focus at first. Cedarne was detonated at 10am July 6th 1962. This is a view taken from the top of a 1500 foot tower located 6 miles from ground zero. These sequences are being shown at about one third normal speed. The base surge seen forming here continued to grow until it covered an area about 5 miles in diameter. The main cloud rose to a height of 12,000 feet above the desert floor. The dome rose to a height of 290 feet before it vented at 3 seconds. This long view gives a better picture of the mass of material moved by the explosion and the early stages of cloud formation. If you examine the energetic phenomena in New York, you can try to estimate how deep the device was buried. It was certainly placed higher than the case of Cedarne. That's not too high. It's a very high level of energy. If you examine the energetic phenomena in New York, you can try to estimate how deep the device was buried. If you examine the energy of Cedarne, it's higher than the case of Cedarne. That's not 200 meters. It was certainly placed deeper than the case of ESA's T-PART that was deeper than 20 meters. Accordingly, you can try to estimate the real depth of detonation. However, for having all this worked as planned, some preparations are required. What we did observe after the buildings had been opened on top at 300 meters, were multiple and time delayed explosions. We know the architects and engineers, for 9-11 truth, always refer to these small but multiple explosions and they assume that one big final explosion, using the incendiary thermite, did bring the towers down. If you look at the scheme of events from the nuclear point of view, then you have to prepare the building. This means you need an area where pressure equalization can take place in a height of 350 meters. This is like opening a chimney. Further, in order to create this nuclear chimney, you need to connect the elevator shafts. These were not connected at the beginning of the operation. And if you want to achieve such a destruction pattern and ask the towers to show, you need these preparations. Well, if you hadn't had this chimney created, there would have been the possibility that the tower would break at its base, top over and simply fall. But if you permit pressure equalization at this point on top, at this point where the parabola changes direction, then the out shooting material will rip the embryo and weaken steel structure apart from top to bottom. This means we had a system which used various components simultaneously. Where these classical explosions, we had the radiation pulse out of the ground, a neutron radiation flash, and we had these charges of eruptive material which finally tore the towers down. In this context, I developed the physical model showing here. Here we have the device directly after the explosion. At this point, here you have a columnator, you may call it also a moderator if you like. It's just something which adapts nutrients to our needs. You have the neutron flash inside the tower which is responsible for the sudden embrittlement of the steel. Thus partly the steel will evaporate, partly will suffer extreme embrittlement. And if the entire building in the course of one hour suffered several explosions, then this embrittlement can be defined as the second step to destruction. So you have first the classical distractions using the fermate and other explosives. You have second the embrittlement of the steel directly after the detonation of the device. And last ten seconds after the detonation you have the final eruption which destroys the tower in the third step. Here you see a picture of a nuclear fuel experiment showing such a columnator for neutron radiation. In principle, this is only an aperture plate. Generally neutron radiation, especially fast neutron radiation, virtually passes everything without resistance. So they use six huge blocks of concrete in succession, hoping that each of these blocks, well it's estimate one meter thick each, will block some part of the radiation. However, at the point where you have these holes in this aperture plate, the neutron will pass through. So after six plates you will get a focused or at least an aligned particle beam where all other directions and transverse components are missing. To allow you to compare this, here's an example on a small scale. If you want to align a particle beam, you use a columnator which will block all particles which do not have desired orientation or direction. An additional effect is during the second step of destruction that the center of explosion and the shaft is being sealed off. People always ask themselves why didn't I hear anything? You see, in the center of explosion, you have a temperature of 1 million degrees Celsius approximately. The neutrons liberated during explosions do have a mean speed of 22,000 kilometers per second. As a result, they are already inside the tower well before the sound has the possibility to get out of the shaft. Thus the liquefied rock destroys and seals off the shaft, as well as compensates for a few seconds the initial pressure of the main blast. Inside the tower however, you get an interaction of a different sort of radiation because of the neutron that's entered the tower, they are immediately scattered by iron. As a result of this bombardment of the crystal structures of iron are destroyed, the solved iron becomes brittle and at the same time different times of radiation are generated. Brands Stranglim Gamma Radiation, X-ray Radiation, Microwave Radiation all this transforms the tower for a short time into a sort of antenna. Further, we found the molecular dissociation of the steel took place as the radiation does destroy the lattice structure of the iron crystal and consequently the steel was transformed to dust. Yes, the steel was dustified. The steel, which was still found, was used in the construction of the 30 meter high, but it was only under the ground that was destroyed. You must not make the mistake to conceive the incidence of something which acts like a tsunami that you have an area which is completely flooded and up there everything is dry. Skated particle radiation does not act this way, you will rather have the characteristics of a machine gun firing micro-boils. You have a statistical average by which the radiation takes effect, but you cannot say which powder steel goda will be destroyed. So, you are going to goda will be destroyed. No, no, no, no. So, we have to say that we are not in the state of the earth. We have a state of the earth or a tsunami. Well, there are first these iron droplets. These were formed out of the evaporated steel. And on the other side, we have steel dust. This is the steel which got a radiation impulse, which did not lead to the evaporation of the steel, but which led to the break up of the steel structure. So, to speak. You really have to imagine a simple picture. You take a hammer and a sheet of paper. You strike the sheet of paper with this hammer. The sheet of paper stays intact. You repeat this with a paint of glass. The paint of glass will break. Of course, in case of steel plate as it is ductile and is moldable, you have to use a very, very fast hammer as sort of high energy hammer. And the neutron in use radiation just acts that way that it can destroy the atomic structure of iron. The USGS did only perform the analysis of the present elements. Correct, exactly. Yes, totally correct. The dust which was simply carried away is very, very precious. It should be analyzed. A lot is visible in plain sight. Even taking fire and old pieces which clearly show that the steel became brittle. This is a classical problem in nuclear reactors. The steel becomes brittle after some time. Well, and finally, this magma chamber is formed. This is a high pressured bladder of liquefied rock which acts like an erupting volcano. And I am just playing this video clip of a volcano eruption. Here you see a classical volcano eruption, nothing special. Without someone's assistance, the magma chamber explodes. Pyro-classic clouds are formed horizontally and out of the chamber a hot cloud is rising. This is how a volcano eruption looks like. If a corresponding energy is present inside the magma chamber. And now we compare this. This is a selection of various video clips. It starts with a south tower's eruption. Compare this with a geese and its bass howl. First, you will hear the bass howl of the geese and just imagine how hot gases are shooting upwards. The required size of the eruption channel must be approximately 10 meters by 10 meters. Then you will see the eruption of gases from underground. Then you will see the events at our one and final events at Building 7. Coming down on me. Here it comes. I am getting behind the car. It goes to second tower. Un-fucking-laver world. The giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant giant Look at this unbelievable. Look at this unbelievable. Look at this unbelievable. I'm watching all day. This is like watching the collapse of an active volcano. And the dust from it is not unlike that from a volcano. We are on the phone with the New York Fire Department Lieutenant. It does appear that building number seven has just collapsed. We've been telling you that that building was on fire. Building number seven at the trade complex has now apparently collapsed. So also, a report to building a project might be in fire too. But now, a huge amount of smoke and debris now up in that area again because of this building number seven going down. So, this is the artificial volcano eruption in New York. And after a while, one is wondering where the hell is the radioactivity. And the first evidence I got is of course a very depressing one, namely the rising number of cancer victims. But before we will examine this, still one note. I saw the video several times and suddenly I noticed something which I did oversee for a long time, namely the simulation of the cameras. If you are engulfed in the radioactive cloud, your camera will start to fail. This means it suddenly starts to register strange dots and green lines. And those people who are really called inside the cloud had strange phenomena in their cameras. All right, that's the point where the camera went down. Exactly, that's the point where the camera went down. The phenomena is called sintilation. When a radioactive particle passes through a thin layer of material, it produces these light emissions. I would like to give you some instructions for our radioactivity counter. The first step after starting you have to cover the lens. And now we get the measurements. I test now with our small probe here. And where we can see the dots and we get also a microgay per hour value which is got it after one minute. But I don't want to take this probe here so long. Now we go to the bookla anlage where we have more possibilities for higher resolution. And now we start with a higher radiation. I just wanted to test what happens with the phones when I am using 10 cvd per hour. This is a really dangerous rate. One half an hour here before this device and you are dead with 50% within the next week. So by this you can measure the everyday natural background radiation. And after finding this I was of course surprised. And I started looking for other video clips if they showed similar phenomena. And they were indeed some very few however which showed these phenomena. There are two few clips available as only a few people were indeed captured inside the dust card and continued filming. To my great surprise I did find one shared clip with exactly the situation. But the critical point all gets just right. So I am going to show you how to do this. To my great surprise I did find one shared clip with exactly the situation. But the critical point all gets just right. So they did not cut it out. I don't know perhaps they thought this is not interesting because nothing can be seen anyway. At least I found it obvious. Then I did some research. At the moment we have this situation. More than 2,000 people dead due to 9,000 lemon diseases. More than 5,400 people's cigarette cancer. More than 37,000 people seriously sick. And more than 72,000 people received medical care. And then I drew a hypothetical map of a possible radiation distribution. I mean every person can suffer a certain amount of radiation before really noticing it. Normally we do not perceive radioactive radiation. This room could be highly radioactive we wouldn't notice. I mean we wouldn't notice at first only sometime later. And indeed it is possible to calculate a radiation contamination which would have been possible that day. Without the first responders noticing that they are under heavy radiation exposure. However these radiation values must decrease rapidly within a few days. Only by this, by a constant exposure to low levels of radiation, destructive ionization can take effect over a long period of time and finally cause cancer. You are after Maria's shoulder. Coming to the next point, EMP and isotopes. There is a scientist, Dr. Judy Wood, who formulated the idea that very exotic radiation weaponry might have been used. As quite strange phenomena had been observed, such as the sudden inflammation of cars. And one cannot explain why when using classical explosives to bring a building down, why suddenly the cars around do go up in flames. Exactly, the paper does not burn, but the cars go up in flames. Exactly, these are the effects of additional radiation as I told. The paper can't absorb the energy, but metal can absorb this energy. And consequently she drew a very very bold conclusion and said that radiation weaponry does exist where you can focus the radiation energy at any desired target. I don't want to disappoint all those who support and like these ideas. And thus I say that Dr. Judy Wood is right, however, the tower itself is this weapon. This means that the tower itself forms a centena array. Its source of energy is the radiation flux from below the earth and thus the tower is capable of storing for a few seconds the radiation energy. In fact, it forms a Faraday cage. And when this Faraday cage suddenly breaks up in the moment the fountain is formed, then the radiation energy is also released. Which causes the secondary EMP impulse by which the cars do in flame. In short, we have the tower. You have the neutron flash inside the tower. You have to tower as a Faraday cage and as an antenna array. And at the same time the particle flux is orientated strictly vertically so that indeed even people in the towers could survive the flash. This I did not believe at first they survived the neutron flash should being quite close to it. Here at this point the neutron flash passed nearby and they survived. Simply because they weren't touched by it. This graphic shows the fish products of uranium, the maxima show strontium and barium. Well, if you like you can compare nuclear fission to wood chopping. If you chop wood with an X, each piece is slightly different and you can draw a statistical distribution pattern as well. If you get a particularly big half up there then you will have a particularly small half down here. Period, no option. And shown here is simply a statistical distribution pattern showing the expected sizes of the fission products. This means you expect this distribution in respect to a given standard. Each of these small dots is called an isotope. This is an isotope, this is another isotope which means one element with just like a different atomic weight. And these isotopes are radioactive each one to a different degree. And in relation to this distribution map you have a clear expectancy of the radioactivity which corresponds to this map. And now the crucial word under laboratory conditions. This means if you detonate a fission bomb high up in the atmosphere you will get indeed this distribution as shown here. But if you detonate such a bomb underground things are different. Let's suppose we have a fraction of 1 million for a second then you get a small fireball at 1 million degrees Celsius. The neutral radiation will escape upwards without being hindered into the tower. And the rest will be within the rockbed where it will be scattered back. This means the isotopes via a nice classical distribution map will be hit again by a neutral bombardment. Which would eventually cause a shift in distribution of the fission products. So if you are trying hard in searching for Stronism 90 which you do expect with a certain probability it might well be that you are searching in vain. As in the case of a secondary neutral impact the expected Stronism 90 will turn into Stronism 91. It simply absorbs under neutral but by doing so it gets much more radioactive. This means it will decay much faster. It no longer has the expected half-life of 30 years but only 7 days. Consequently if you are able to influence this whole process in a way that you get highly radioactive isotopes then you will have few weeks of high levels of radiation in the center of explosion. And after a few years of month already, terrible values. The same does apply for barium of course. That´s exactly what I was trying to draw. As you even know how high-��al infantry takes sharp shots. At least the best I could ever see was theory of the theory of participation with intensive care troublesome workers, not really too dangerous to let people work there. And then I want to end it again. So I think I'm now, they are more sensitive. So the NanoTermit in the summer of 10 tons was level 1 or B2 where the people who had the explosions were there. There were the steel-dricker. In every steel-dricker, we say 20 kg of the fire. So the whole thing comes down to the glass-dick. It's not necessary to take something else. Of course, the NanoTermit is used. You get temperatures from the milling unit. If you do it in a milling unit with 10 tons of NanoTermit, then you need everything to let it go down. The thing which also surprised me in this context was that, at this time, there was a constant bombardment of the population of New York with warnings of a dirty bomb terror attack. I think this started in 2005, but I may be mistaken. The whole thing was called the Ring of Protection, which was a large-scale operation in order to warn the people in respect to a nuclear terror attack. And people got crazed by hearing these constant warnings. The authorities even considered a ban against radiotivity counters, I mean for civilians, because too many files were reported. If someone just lived a hospital after a thyroid treatment, then this counter will also go off, because it does reduce the radioactive counts. So there was a time when the population was driven mad. Terrorists wanted to detonate a radioactive bomb, meaning a dirty bomb. And there are various video recordings available. One can imagine an enormous amount of disruption, even if a very small dirty bomb were detonated. Walk around the city or drive around the suburbs, there's a good chance you'll be screened by a dirty bomb detector. It's a near invisible intense effort to fight terror. CBS2's Tony Aiello gives us an exclusive look inside the Ring of Protection against dirty bomb. In the city that never sleeps, it's the terror threat that keeps some up at night. We have to think the unthinkable. I think it's more a question of when, than whether we'll have one. The man just said something very important. He said it's rather a question of when. He doesn't have any doubts. He said there indeed will be a dirty bomb. I think it's more a question of when and whether we'll have one. This means that the population was prepared. Hey, you will get problems with radiation. And there was a second and very interesting issue. I think it was in 2007. Yes, in 2007, there was a steam pipe explosion in York and the FBI rushed in wearing full protection suites against ABC weapons. And might ask why the authorities are so troubled by a broken steam pipe. In respect to the nuclear reaction, this is quite important. Well, indeed I had a headache for the month because the radactivity was not as high as expected at first. I wanted to find more radactivity or I needed more radactivity before making this bold step and declaring, well, this was a nuclear process. Or at least an additional nuclear component. And suddenly, I stumbled across an article which stated that first ironed us for mostly stable isotopes. This means normally when a nuclear bomb explodes in the Nevada desert, the sand, the silicon will absorb nutrients and will become radioactive. Iron can absorb more nutrients than other elements and not become radioactive. As a result, you can search with your Geiger counter as long as you wish. It will stay silent. That's my first point. These steel structures iron has a certain stability. Even if you have new isotopes, they might not be radioactive. Consequently, you have to check the remaining steel if iron isotope 57 and iron isotope 58 are present. Iron 56 is the main component of iron. So just look for isotope 57 and isotope 58. Don't use your Geiger counter. And the second point, which I noted very, very late, iron scatters. You know the argument. Neutron radiation transmits its energy to water. This means all living things are destroyed, are killed by neutron radiation. And you know that it does not interact with building structures, brick buildings and so on. However, this is only partly correct. The key question is always, what will absorb the energy? And if neutron scatter on iron better than on water, then you have especially for iron an absolutely devastating effect of neutron radiation. Here you see the cross sections of some materials iron among them. And especially fast neutrons as they are produced during nuclear-efficient explosions, do scatter much more efficiently at iron 56 as on hydrogen. The factor is somewhat lower for thermal neutrons. These are present, for example, in nuclear reactor. So usually use water in nuclear reactors in order to slow the neutrons down as they can interact with it. And as you can see, iron has just outstanding values. This means you have an element with excellent neutron scattering capabilities and a low probability transform itself into another isotope. And even if it does, it will turn radioactive only after absorbing the third neutron. This is the explanation, in my opinion, that you can have iron micro droplets in the iron dust and no signal is detectable by the guy's encounter. But if you go down into the rock bed, there you have the radiation present. Because the rock will absorb the neutron radiation and if absorption takes place, new isotopes are generated. And they will decay emitting radioactive radiation. Because the new activity back there for... That's why they placed water basins on top, exactly. That's because they don't need to be that... Well, it started with a snappy remark by William Tahil that in fact a tribute in light, which they are so proud of, has in reality the same wavelength as the shrink of radiation inside a nuclear reactor. It's just, if it rains on the radioactive 9.11 site, there would be a soft bluish glimmer in early 2002. I don't know if they really choose to play this game, but it is striking to see these similarities to the wavelength of the shrink of radiation. And of course, we can suppose, at least I do argue on the assumption that there is a residual radiation from below. And what we should do is to analyze the rock 20, 30 meters below these basins. Here you can see an up-to-date shot on Google Maps. You see the memorial pools. And you see this pit in the middle, which has approximately the size of the eruption channel needed. And you can easily imagine how the hot gases shot upwards through this channel, even with the structures still standing, which in fact did stand firmly for about 10 seconds until it was destroyed from top down. So, technically all this makes sense, but it is a technique which is based on a very, very subtle interaction of various processes. You also have to prepare the channel underground to make it work. A few minutes ago, you asked the question concerning the bathtub, I actually did draw it here. If you designed the entire layout in a way that the pressure wave fades here, the bathtub will be undemaged. Only at the outer circle, it certainly will be within this sphere where a new generation is present. But if the main pressure wave fades already here, then you can explain why the bathtub's flow is still straight. In addition, the reported damage the outer rim can be easily explained by the impulse response. If you had a soft material such as sand, the pressure would simply move these walls apart, pushing them outwards. If it is surrounded by very strong, non-flexible material as concrete or rock, the material will push back. By this, you can explain the bathtub's leaning walls in the direction of the tower. Beneath the twin towers, lay what engineers called the bathtub, a giant basement as big as eight city blocks and more than 75 feet deep. It contained seven levels of parking lots, maintenance offices, mechanical rooms, and the path. A commuter rail system running under the Hudson River from New Jersey. A three-foot thick concrete retaining wall called a slurry wall kept the Hudson River and groundwater from flooding into the basement. When the towers collapsed, most of the floors that had held the slurry wall in place were destroyed. Unsupported walls shifted. If they caved in, water would fill the bathtub and inundate the path and New York City's subways, flooding them for miles. When excavators dug below street level, they exposed sections of the slurry wall held up only by debris. Engineers searched for ways to remove debris without causing a catastrophic collapse. On the southern end of the site, near the ruined vista hotel, workers discovered a vast section of the slurry wall left totally unsupported. The Grappler operator, he said, Charlie, he goes, I don't think I should go out there. I said, what's the problem? He said, the ground is shaking. And I said, well, let's back off, let me get the engineering team down here immediately. We found that the slurry wall was moving just south of the vista hotel. These walls are coming in. They moved in about six inches. And these walls hold back the river. So if these walls cave in, this place is going to get flooded out by the river. There was sort of a valley sitting out in here between the wall and the south tower. All the collapse had gone down to track level. These are shown here in red and orange colors. This is the timescale. This is the moment when the first plane hit, they were able to seismically register the event. Shown here is the impact of a second plane, as well as the explosions which occurred a few seconds before the impact, as described by William Rodriguez for the north tower. This is the exact time the plane hit the surface of the valley. With the seismic wave, this is the front of the front of the vehicle. This is the exact time the vehicle hit the surface of the valley. This means the seismic wave has a wave that is in the ground, which does not have any impact on the ground. And if you look at the hand of the wave, that is, the ground wave, the damage waves, and so on, there are only a few points in the ground. But they are not over there. This means that there are three points in the ground. We have the upper and lower, upper and lower. Right, correct. But the event is shown here as impact. Perfect. There still exists a third corresponding shock wave from the destruction of building seven, which has not been published, but has been registered. I have another question. I want to explain that the victims, the workers, the workers must be in the area of the Umi steve, because the victims made a problem at that time. Yes. Also theisird단 denug<|de|> And the end of it is the command of me and the emission of the eye is... Well, finally, in respect to cancer and the fast degrading rubber boots, you can explain it either way. And ultimately, I want to point this out. We have different groups, not only in the audience inside this room, but worldwide, who vehemently fight for some sort of views and exclude others. Of course, one can explain all cancer cases by the toxicity and the toxic fumes coming out of the ground. Of course, one can explain that the rubber boots were decomposed by aggressive substances and by the heat extremely fast. But it does not exclude the existence of an additional source of energy, which causes cancer or the embrittlement and the aging of rubber parts and which leads to bursting of hydraulic lines. And you have to be aware that you have to be aware of the energy that is active and free of heat. Yes, so first you have a scorching hot chamber, deeply underground, which stores a lot of heat. Then you have radioactive decay, radioactive process down there. And then you have certainly residual energy from the thermatic material as a thermite. And it is this combination of components. I'm talking about the combination. I'm trying to design a model, a physical model which explains every observed issue. Thermite did play its part in this scheme. You could have rolled the towels down just by using thermite. But in this case, it would have difficulties to explain certain radiation phenomena as the burning cars, especially to explain the inflammation of cars which were parked near wire netted fences. Here you can see a few good pictures. The cars behind the wire netted fence are quite shiny. The cars in front of the fence are roasted too. Well, yes, here you have the another picture, similar situation. Yes, this is taken from Judy Wood. So here you have the wire netted fence with the roasted cars. The cars further away, just suffered a bit. Well, if you have these energetic phenomena, at this rate of 800 meters, well then... Because we do not have any energy anymore... Some clothes are worse than the old ones here. Apparently, you can see the быть. I'm really trying to say nobody has mistaken. taken. If there's a big group of people and I blame them for spreading nonsense, no, really. Let's be thankful and highlight the important valuable findings of all groups because finally all we want is to contribute to the solution of this riddle. Further, one of the arguments of the organization, Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, is that there are no signs of acute radiation sickness. Well, there are video clips which do show soldiers who walk into the center of explosion in direction of the mushroom cloud. And of course, they suffer somewhat from radiation. Nonetheless, the biological effectiveness does depend very much on the period of time. From the duration you actually stay within this contaminated area. I mean, what is indeed very, very harmful when you do lift directly next to it? Let's assume that the event was radioactive even very limited and with low levels of radiation. If you were living in a yoga that time, near the World Trade Center, you very likely will have serious health problems. The real, acute radiation syndrome, I mean, a lot of hair shaking, vomiting and so forth, will be noticeable only after you got a radiation dose equivalent to the biological effectiveness of the seavid. And this is indeed very, very much. But if we assume that an underground nuclear explosion took place by which you had only this nutrient flesh inside the tower, you could stay several days in this area without being seriously affected. This is the explanation why we did not observe this acute radiation sickness as sleepless order digested problems and unexplainable pain and so forth. We have some very sad news to report today about the loss of three true American heroes, Daniel Heggland, Howard Bischoff and Robert Lieber. According to the city's department of mental and physical hygiene, thousands of individuals including rescue, recovery and cleanup workers and people who lived, worked or went to school in Lower Manhattan on September 11th have developed chronic and often co-occurring mental and physical health conditions. So a lot of people are unaware of this, but it's an epidemic of first responders and people who lived in the area who have developed debilitating diseases and chronic problems. One of the things that I keep coming across in articles about this, it's like Gulf War-like symptoms. Okay, constant fever, shakes, you're hot and cold at the same time, headaches, vomiting, debilitating pain and remember, Congress at first blocked a bill which would pay for all of the healthcare costs of these heroes. So you do right in addition, the dust sample analysis done by the USGS does not confirm nuclear fission. The solid matter analysis shows levels of barriament strontium much too high to assume they could be the product of a nuclear fission reaction. This is correct, however, if you take a look at the leach table analysis, you will find not only the expected products of a fission process, but also the elements of the radioactive decay chain. Yes, the USGS is a governmental agency. And immediately absolutely justified, it's not the first time that I am told this be careful. Maybe this is a false trail. Do you remember the child showing the two fission products barriament strontium and me comparing it with wood chopping. This is enlargement of the charred. Up there is the peak of fish and product probability. Correspondingly shown here is strontium, itrium and circonium. So the law of radiativity K in this case is strontium, itrium, circonium, niobium. This is a better to K so the line goes just up like this until stability is reached. So we are looking at uranium fission and we know the strontium is the result of this fission process with high probability. And we know this strontium would decay into itrium then into circonium and finally to niobium. What are we looking for when you know the strontium is present? We are looking for itrium circonium and niobium and finally the question is are these elements present? Well they are not only present but they are even listed in close proximity to each other. This means in addition to the expected fission products strontium and barium we have also the expected elements of the radiactivity K chain listed by the USGS as a governmental agency. Well and this is as a matter of fact a proof beyond any doubt. Our goal is to figure out why it collapsed late in the afternoon on September 11th, 2001 even though it was not hit by an airplane. The investigation conduct by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded. What we found was an uncontrolled building fires caused an extraordinary event. The collapse of World War I Center 7 was primarily due to fight. Our investigation will evaluate the probability that this was the cause of the collapse. Well yes for those who doubt everything there is a possibility that exactly these elements were stored as chemicals in their stable form in small marmalade pots inside a tower but but but given the energetic phenomena we could observe the cancer cases showing up when we consider what is related to this event named the war in Iraq and the new anti-terror laws which we are confronted with in these days then I tend to believe that the USGS status correct in its current form. Nonetheless be careful it is a governmental agency even they can make mistakes. Well we have for barium and strontium the expected radioactive decay elements in the dust sample analysis and of course this no coincidence that this data is being published the concentration of these substances are low. By using this formulation I want to say the question is does it make sense to publish this data or not does someone want to show us something or do they not want to show it? These are very rare elements in extremely low concentrations but if someone wants indeed to show us that these elements prove or at least support the theory of efficiently case process that it absolutely makes sense to list them and it's also very courageous to do so. Finally I also have to build up a border in order to make a decision always asking myself which sources are reliable always being careful and which are not and how I am going to construct that reliable physical model and where doubts do remain. I mean if the USGS does present data which support my findings then I will not try to dismantle them if the list is claiming well the building was burning and the old steel melted and that's why the building came down then we will doubt this. Our take home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery. World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from fuel oil fires. So what we need in the end is an analysis of the rock bed looking for isotopes as well as the remaining steel. Yes, you're right. The rain has been found in the USGS, that's why we have no checks here noticing Kingdom I like to tell me to film How were the policymakers of Alfie because they made the wig strip orange from our communities? I mean, it's a very positive name to say, yes, you don't have to do anything. Or I think that's not very important. It's completely there. Even the age of theology, or whatever we often say for safety, does not make sense. It's not enough to explain all phenomena. That's why I think it's an activity of what to be. I think that the idea of the theory must be something. Because otherwise I can explain only what I'm talking about. In what way I can explain it, I can't say it. We can also say that we don't have to go to the church. We have to go outside, to get up and say it was a sin. And I think you don't deserve it. And it was also a military action. Otherwise, you could not have built the most secure world. To explore, that was also a military organization. That was established. And they simply have the middle of the world as the least they can know. And then of course you can discuss about it. What more relevance, more faithfulness and so on. In this way, I can say that it's very interesting what you've even done together. And this work that I believe will be a great opportunity for you. Thank you very much. Hereby I also do finish my presentation. On the internet there's an extended version of this topic. Just go to 911history.de and you have the continuation of the story. Some additional flags, finally. I was trying to show how the Mossad was involved in this operation. Which, at which it doesn't stop there. I finally understood that this is a crime which has the characteristics of self-similarity. So to state that just Mossad did it or just the Israeli did it or just the financial system did it is not correct. Because in the end it is us who are giving the money to the financial system. This means if we shut up and do nothing against these crimes then we are together part of the system. And that's also one of my motivations. That's why I'm printing these cards. That's why I'm sometimes sending out these postcards inviting people to discussion with a pool of in the last moment. Because the hotel's manager doesn't want me to present this at the location. So I'm doing these small exhibitions handing out these cards and small flyers. Just take them home with you. I have enough material at home. I'm very glad I could present my point of view today because normally I'm shown the exit door.